Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2000, p. 2176-2178, Vol. 44, No. 8
Spanish National Reference Laboratory, Instituto de Salud
Carlos III, Carretera. Majadahonda a Pozuelo, 28220 Majadahonda,1 and Medical Department,
SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, 28034 Madrid,2 Spain
Received 6 March 2000/Returned for modification 11 April
2000/Accepted 3 May 2000
The MICs at which 90% of isolates are inhibited for gemifloxacin,
trovafloxacin, and grepafloxacin were low ( Extracellular susceptibility testing
should be regarded as a screening method to determine drug inactivity
(4) against Legionella isolates. The
intracellular location of the infecting microorganism is responsible
for the in vitro-in vivo activity-efficacy dichotomy seen with some
antimicrobial agents (9).
Gemifloxacin is a broad-spectrum quinolone that has good intracellular
penetration. This study investigated the antimicrobial susceptibilities
of Legionella isolates to gemifloxacin compared with their
susceptibilities to five quinolones and two macrolides. Two different
test methods (the broth microdilution and agar dilution methods) were
used, and the influence of the presence of charcoal in the test medium
was also investigated.
The test panel included 251 clinical isolates and 20 environmental
isolates of Legionella pneumophila, collected between 1983 and 1999 in 18 autonomous regions of Spain. The 251 clinical isolates of Legionella included 1 L. longbeachae isolate
and 250 L. pneumophila isolates. L. pneumophila
serogroups (SG) were determined by polyclonal antibody testing; 208 SG-1, 1 SG-2, 8 SG-3, 1 SG-4, 2 SG-5, 9 SG-6, 3 SG-8, 1 SG-9, 4 SG-10,
2 SG-12, 4 SG-4,8,10, 2 SG-3,6, 1 SG-3,5, 1 SG-5,10, 1 SG-5,8, and 2 SG-8,10 isolates were included. The 20 environmental isolates of
L. pneumophila included 17 SG-1 strains, 2 SG-6 strains and
1 SG-4,8 strain. These isolates were epidemiologically related to
outbreaks or single patients with Legionnaires' disease from whom the
corresponding clinical isolate was available.
Overall, the test panels included 196 isolates of L. pneumophila SG-1 Pontiac, 18 isolates of L. pneumophila
SG-1 Olda, 9 isolates of L. pneumophila SG-1 Bellingham, 2 isolates of L. pneumophila SG-1 nontypeable (as assessed
with monoclonal antibodies), 45 isolates of L. pneumophila
that belonged to other subgroups, and 1 L. longbeachae
isolate. Fifty-four percent of the isolates came from the Mediterranean
(east) coast of Spain, 10% came from the north of Spain (Cantabrian
coast), 13% came from Madrid, and the remaining 23% came from other
regions in the interior of the country. All strains were stored in skim
milk at Levofloxacin, trovafloxacin, grepafloxacin, clarithromycin, and
gemifloxacin (SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Tonbridge, United
Kingdom), erythromycin, ofloxacin (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.),
and ciprofloxacin (Bayer S.A., Barcelona, Spain) were kindly provided
as powders of known potencies, diluted in distilled water, and frozen
at Broth microdilution susceptibility testing was carried out with 96-well
microtiter plates that contained 50 µl of buffered yeast extract
supplemented with 0.1% Agar dilution susceptibility testing was performed as follows: a series
of eight twofold dilutions in distilled water was prepared for each
test antimicrobial agent, and 2 ml was added to plates that contained
18 ml of BCYE In order to assess the effect of charcoal-containing medium, the MICs
for 20% of the isolates (50 L. pneumophila isolates) were
determined in BCYE From the point of view of resistance monitoring, no differences in
susceptibility with respect to year of isolation, geographical origin,
SGs, or subgroups were found. Despite the previously documented differences in susceptibility between clinical and environmental isolates (8), this study did not show differences, probably because the 20 environmental isolates tested were epidemiologically related to patients from whom the corresponding clinical isolate was
also tested.
The antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for the total test
panel of Legionella spp. are shown in Table
1. By the broth microdilution method, the
most active agents were trovafloxacin (MIC at which 90% of isolates
are inhibited [MIC90], 0.0018 µg/ml), gemifloxacin
(MIC90, 0.003 µg/ml), and grepafloxacin
(MIC90, 0.007 µg/ml). Levofloxacin and clarithromycin
showed similar activities (MIC90s, 0.015 µg/ml) and were
more active than ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin (MIC90s, 0.03 µg/ml) and than erythromycin (MIC90, 0.12 µg/ml). A
completely different picture is seen when one considers the results
obtained by the agar dilution method. Clarithromycin and levofloxacin
appeared to be the most active compounds (MIC90s, 0.12 µg/ml), followed by erythromycin and trovafloxacin
(MIC90s, 0.25 µg/ml), with the MIC90s of all
other quinolones tested being high (
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
In Vitro Activities of Gemifloxacin versus Five Quinolones and
Two Macrolides against 271 Spanish Isolates of Legionella
pneumophila: Influence of Charcoal on Susceptibility Test
Results
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
0.01 µg/ml) for 271 Legionella isolates when they were determined by the broth microdilution method but increased (
6 dilutions) when they were determined by the agar dilution method. This was due to the charcoal in
the agar dilution medium, as shown by the progressive decrease in the
MICs when the charcoal concentrations decreased. As free drug is the
active fraction, charcoal binding should be considered.
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
70°C.
70°C until they were assayed.
-ketoglutarate (BYE
) medium (3). The bacterial colonies were grown in buffered charcoal yeast extract agar supplemented with 0.1%
-ketoglutarate (BCYE
) at 35°C. After 3 days the colonies were suspended in distilled water
and the turbidity was adjusted to that of a no. 2 McFarland standard
(6 × 108 CFU/ml). The test wells were then inoculated
with 50 µl to give a final inoculum of 3 × 105
CFU/ml. Each plate also included two antimicrobial agent-free control
wells: the first one contained 100 µl of BYE
medium, and the
second one contained 50 µl of the bacterial suspension plus 50 µl
of BYE
medium. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 were used as control strains.
The microtiter plates were incubated at 35°C in humidified air for 3 days.
(3). The test isolates were grown on
BCYE
plates (1) at 35°C in a humidified environment. The colonies were suspended in distilled water, and the turbidity was
adjusted to that of a no. 1 McFarland standard (108
CFU/ml). A replicator device was used to inoculate 1 µl of the suspension onto antimicrobial agent-containing BCYE
plates, to give
a final inoculum of 104 to 105 CFU/spot. Strain
ATCC 33152 (Philadelphia) and a L. pneumophila SG-1 strain
were used as controls. Up to 52 strains were inoculated onto each
plate, which always included the control strains. In addition, two
antimicrobial agent-free control plates, one with BCYE
and the other
with BCYE
not supplemented with cysteine, were also included. All
plates were incubated at 35°C in a humidified environment for 3 days.
with decreasing charcoal concentrations (100, 75, 50, and 25% of the charcoal content in the original BCYE
medium
[3]) by previously described methods (7).
0.5 µg/ml).
TABLE 1.
MIC50s, MIC90s, and MIC ranges
for 271 Legionella isolates determined by the microdilution
method (BYE
medium) and the agar dilution method (BCYE
)
It has been reported that the use of BCYE
results in 4- to 10-fold
increases in the MICs compared with those obtained by tests that use
BYE
medium (4). The activities of most antimicrobial agents are inhibited by BCYE
to a greater extent than by BYE
(5, 6). The degree of inhibition caused by BCYE
compared with that caused by BYE
was not the same for all the quinolones tested. While the ratio of the MIC90 obtained with BCYE
to the MIC90 obtained with BYE
medium for gemifloxacin,
trovafloxacin, and grepafloxacin was more than 70, ratios for
ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin were 16, and the ratio for levofloxacin was
8, which was similar to that for clarithromycin. Erythromycin was not
affected by the use of BCYE
.
Table 2 shows the effect of decreasing
the concentrations of charcoal in BCYE
on the MICs determined by the
agar dilution method. The presence of charcoal in BCYE
has been
shown to adversely affect the in vitro activities of some quinolones
(2, 7). In this study, decreasing the charcoal concentration
in the test media by up to 75% had no effect on the MIC50s
and MIC90s of the two macrolides or levofloxacin. In
contrast, for all the other quinolones tested, a decrease in the
charcoal concentration of 75% resulted in decrease in the
MIC50s and MIC90s of four- to eightfold. When
the MICs of the macrolides and levofloxacin for each strain tested are
compared, an increase in the charcoal concentration from 25 to 100%
resulted in no effect or a twofold increase in the MIC. With ofloxacin
and ciprofloxacin there was at least an eightfold reduction in the MIC
for more than 70% of the strains tested when 25% charcoal instead of
100% charcoal was used, with the difference for <10% of strains
being 16-fold. For the newer quinolones, gemifloxacin, trovafloxacin,
and grepafloxacin, at least an eightfold decrease in MIC was detected
for a similar proportion of the strains (
70% of the strains).
However, the percentage of strains for which there was at least a
16-fold difference was much higher (47% for gemifloxacin, 73% for
trovafloxacin, and 38% for grepafloxacin) compared with percentage
obtained in tests with the older agents.
|
If the MIC90 obtained in tests with BYE
medium (0%
charcoal) is compared with the MIC90 obtained in tests with
BCYE
(25% charcoal), it can be deduced that even low concentrations
of charcoal have a marked effect on the activities of the newer
quinolones (16-fold for trovafloxacin and 64-fold for gemifloxacin) but
not on that of erythromycin, indicating that differences between the MICs of quinolones are due to charcoal binding and not to other differences between methods.
Laboratories should be aware of the fact that only the unbound fraction of an antibiotic has antibacterial activity and that new quinolones are profoundly affected by the binding to charcoal so that they can use test methods which reflect the true activities of new quinolones.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This study was supported by a grant from SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Harlow, United Kingdom.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Medical Department, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Valle de la Fuenfría, 3, 28034 Madrid, Spain. Phone: 34-91-334 5275. Fax: 34-91-334 5141. E-mail: lorenzo.aguilar-alfaro{at}sb.com.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Dedicoat, M., and P. Venkatesan.
1999.
The treatment of Legionnaires' disease.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
43:747-752 |
| 2. |
Edelstein, P. H.,
K. A. Pasiecznik,
V. K. Yasui, and R. D. Meyer.
1982.
Susceptibility of Legionella spp. to mycinamicin I and II and other macrolide antibiotics: effect of media composition and origin of organisms.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
22:90-93 |
| 3. |
Edelstein, P. H., and M. A. C. Edelstein.
1989.
WIN 57273 is bactericidal for Legionella pneumophila grown in alveolar macrophages.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
33:2132-2136 |
| 4. | Edelstein, P. H. 1995. Antimicrobial chemotherapy for Legionnaires' disease: a review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 21(Suppl. 3):S265-S276. |
| 5. |
Liebers, D. M.,
A. L. Baltch,
R. P. Smith,
M. C. Hammer, and J. V. Conroy.
1989.
Susceptibility of Legionella pneumophila to eight antimicrobial agents including four macrolides under different assay conditions.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
23:37-41 |
| 6. |
Pohlod, D. J.,
L. D. Saravolatz,
E. L. Quinn, and M. M. Somerville.
1981.
The effect of inoculum, culture medium and antimicrobial combinations on the in vitro susceptibilities of Legionella pneumophila.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
7:335-341 |
| 7. | Ruckdeschel, G., and A. Dalhoff. 1999. The in-vitro activity of moxifloxacin against Legionella species and the effects of medium on susceptibility test results. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 43(Suppl. B):25-29. |
| 8. |
Tsakris, A.,
S. Alexiou-Daniel,
E. Souliou, and A. Antoniadis.
1999.
In-vitro activity of antibiotics against Legionella pneumophila isolates from water systems.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
44:693-695 |
| 9. | Washington, C., and J. R. Winn. 1999. Legionella, p. 572-585. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 7th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»