Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2000, p. 2205-2206, Vol. 44, No. 8
Center for Infectious Disease, School of
Public Health and Medical School, University of
Texas
Received 27 January 2000/Returned for modification 31 March
2000/Accepted 28 April 2000
Rifaximin showed moderately high MICs (the MIC at which 90% of the
isolates tested were inhibited = 50 µg/ml) for 145 bacterial enteropathogens from patients with traveler's diarrhea acquired in
Mexico during the summers of 1997 and 1998. Rifaximin concentrations in
stool the day after oral administration (800 mg daily for 3 days) were
high (average, 7,961 µg/g), proving the value of the drug.
Bacterial agents are known to be the
major cause of traveler's diarrhea. It has been shown that
antibacterial agents are effective in the treatment and prevention of
diarrhea among persons traveling from developed to developing countries
(3, 4). Rifaximin is poorly absorbed after single or
repeated oral administrations to humans, even in patients with a
damaged colonic mucosa (2, 7, 11). It is a rifamycin
derivative with activity against gram-positive, gram-negative, and
anaerobic bacteria (8). Recently, we evaluated rifaximin in
the treatment of traveler's diarrhea. It was shown to be superior to
trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (5) and equivalent to
ciprofloxacin in terms of clinical response (H. L. DuPont, C. D. Ericsson, J. J. Mathewson, Z. D. Jiang, F. Martinez-Sandoval, E. Palazzini, and L. M. Riopel, Abstr.
39th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. 2227, 1999).
The objectives of this study were to determine the in vitro
susceptibility to rifaximin of bacterial enteropathogens isolated from
cases of traveler's diarrhea and to measure rifaximin concentrations in fecal samples after oral administration.
The bacterial strains used were isolates from adults who contracted
traveler's diarrhea during the summers of 1997 and 1998 in
Guadalajara, Mexico. The strains were identified by standard procedures
and were stored at MICs of rifaximin for each bacterial strain were determined by agar
dilution testing according to the methods of the National Committee for
Clinical Laboratory Standards (10). Agar dilution plates
were prepared by making a stock solution of rifaximin with acetone and
preparing twofold dilutions from 200 to 0.1 µg/ml. Plates with
rifaximin were inoculated with 104 bacteria and incubated
at 37°C overnight.
For quality control of antimicrobial potency, the rifaximin MICs for
the recommended control strains (E. coli ATCC 25922, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa ATCC 27853) were determined daily with the test
strains. MICs were defined as the lowest concentration of rifaximin
that completely inhibited visible growth. A fine, barely visible haze
or a single colony was disregarded.
This study was part of a large clinical trial where rifaximin was
compared with ciprofloxacin in the treatment of traveler's diarrhea
(DuPont et al., 39th ICAAC). Thirty-nine adult patients were included
in this part of the study. All patients ( One gram of each stool sample collected posttherapy was diluted with 1 ml of solution in acetone. The mixture was vortexed and centrifuged for
10 min at 1,500 × g. The supernatant was filtered through 0.22-µm-pore-size filters (Nalge, Rochester, N.Y.).
High-performance liquid chromatography was done with a model 717 autosampler and a 510 pump (Waters Corp., Milford, Mass.). Detection
was done using a Waters 486 tunable absorbance detector. The mobile
phase (made with 50 ml of phosphate [0.5 M, pH 7.2], 480 ml of water, and 470 ml of acetonitrile buffer) was filtered through a Millipore 0.2-µm-pore-size membrane. Under these conditions, the rifaximin standard retention time was 7.5 min. Quantitations of rifaximin concentration were based on the relative peak highest response ratio of
each compound and the internal standard.
Rifaximin was shown to have an MIC at which 50% of the isolates tested
were inhibited of 12.5 µg/ml and an MIC at which 90% of the isolates
tested were inhibited of 50 µg/ml for the 145 bacterial isolates
tested. The MICs for two ETEC and one Salmonella isolates
were In Fig. 1, posttherapy stool rifaximin
levels are graphically illustrated for the 39 patients studied. The
concentrations of rifaximin in stool in each interval of collection
were high, decreasing gradually over a 5-day period after therapy was
completed. The posttreatment fecal concentrations of rifaximin exceeded
the MICs for the bacterial isolates obtained in the study, with average drug levels of 7,961 µg/g on the first day posttreatment, 7,425 µg/g on the second, 4,405 µg/g on the third, 2,891 µg/g on the fourth, 3,266 µg/g on the fifth, and 154 µg/g on the sixth.
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
In Vitro Activity and Fecal Concentration of
Rifaximin after Oral Administration
Houston,1 University of Texas
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center,2 and St.
Luke's Episcopal Hospital and Baylor College of
Medicine,5 Houston, Texas; Alfa
Wassermann, S.p.A. Bologna, Italy3; and
Salix Pharmaceuticals Inc., Palo Alto,
California4
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
70°C. The following numbers of strains were
tested: 120 enterotoxigenic strains of Escherichia coli
(ETEC), 17 Shigella strains, and 8 Salmonella strains.
18 years of age) had acute
diarrhea but were otherwise in good health. The patients received
400-mg tablets of rifaximin every 12 h for 3 days consecutively.
They were instructed to provide the next stool passed after the 3-day
treatment period.
0.098 µg/ml; overall, the MIC ranges were
0.098 to 200 µg/ml for the Salmonella and ETEC isolates and 1.25 to 200 µg/ml for the Shigella isolates.

View larger version (8K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Stool concentrations of rifaximin in 39 patients with
traveler's diarrhea tested after treatment with 800 mg of
rifaximin/day. Bars, standard errors of the means.
Rifaximin is currently used in Italy to treat enteric bacterial infection (6), small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (1), and portosystemic encephalopathy (9). Rifaximin has a broad antimicrobial spectrum that includes gram-positive and gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic bacteria (11). As shown in the present study, rifaximin has inhibitory activity against bacterial enteropathogens identified in patients with traveler's diarrhea, although its MICs are high. Ordinarily these strains would be considered resistant to the antimicrobial agent. Rifaximin is largely unabsorbed, since less than 0.01% of the oral dose is detectable in plasma (2). It attains very high intestinal levels. In the present study, fecal levels reached 4,000 to 8,000 µg/g after 3 days of therapy with the drug. If the average daily stool weight passed per day is 150 g, up to 600 to 1,200 mg of rifaximin is eliminated in feces. The patients in the present study took a total of 400 mg of rifaximin twice a day for 3 days. This gives a total of 2,400 mg taken in the 3 days. If one looks at the fecal levels measured, it appears that most of the administered drug appeared in feces. These data agree with previous pharmacokinetic studies conducted with patients and adult volunteers (2, 7, 11).
Based on the results of two clinical trials (7, 8) in which rifaximin successfully shortened the course of traveler's diarrhea, we feel that it is a promising drug for the condition. Currently there is concern that fluoroquinolones should not be used broadly for common infections, to delay the spread of antimicrobial resistance which is already occurring (12). A concern with rifaximin is the emergence of rifampin resistance among mycobacteria, Neisseria meningitidis, and Enterococcus.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This project was supported by Alfa Wassermann, S.p.A., Bologna, Italy.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: University of Texas School of Public Health, 1200 Herman Pressler, Room 706, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (713) 500-9371. Fax: (713) 500-9364. E-mail: ZJIANG{at}UTSPH.SPH.UTH.TMC.EDU.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Corazza, G. R., M. Ventrucci, A. Strocchi, M. Sorge, L. Pranzo, R. Pezzilli, and G. Gasbarrini. 1988. Treatment of small intestine bacterial overgrowth with rifaximin, a non-absorbable rifamycin. J. Int. Med. Res. 16:312-316[Medline]. |
| 2. | Descombe, J. J., D. Dubourg, M. Picard, and E. Palazzini. 1994. Pharmacokinetic study of rifaximin after oral administration in healthy volunteers. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Res. 16:51-56. |
| 3. | DuPont, H. L., R. R. Reves, E. Galindo, P. S. Sullivan, L. V. Wood, and J. G. Mendiola. 1982. Treatment of travelers' diarrhea with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and with trimethoprim alone. N. Engl. J. Med. 307:841-844[Abstract]. |
| 4. |
DuPont, H. L., and C. D. Ericsson.
1993.
Prevention and treatment of traveler's diarrhea.
N. Engl. J. Med.
328:1821-1827 |
| 5. | DuPont, H. L., C. D. Ericsson, J. J. Mathewson, E. Palazzini, M. W. DuPont, Z. D. Jiang, A. Mosavi, and F. J. de la Cabada. 1998. Rifaximin: a nonabsorbed antimicrobial in the therapy of travelers' diarrhea. Digestion 59:708-714[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. | Gillis, J., and R. Brogden. 1995. Rifaximin: a review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential in conditions mediated by gastrointestinal bacteria. Drugs 49:467-484[Medline]. |
| 7. | Gionchetti, P., and F. Rizzello. 1999. Rifaximin in patients with moderate or severe ulcerative colitis refractory to steroid-treatment: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Dig. Dis. Sci. 44:1220-1221[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | Hoover, W., E. Gerlach, D. Hoban, G. Eliopoulos, M. Pfaller, and R. Jones. 1993. Antimicrobial activity and spectrum of rifaximin, a new tropical rifamycin derivative. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 16:111-118[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. | Miglio, F., D. Valpiani, S. Ricca Rossellini, and A. Ferrieri. 1997. Rifaximin, a non-absorbable rifamycin, for the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. A double blind randomized trial. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 13:593-601[Medline]. |
| 10. | National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 4th ed. Approved standard. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa. |
| 11. | Rizzello, F., P. Gionchetti, A. Venturi, M. Ferretti, S. Peruzzo, X. Raspanti, M. Picard, N. Canova, E. Palazzini, and M. Campieri. 1998. Rifaximin systemic absorption in patients with ulcerative colitis. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 54:91-93[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. | Segreti, J., T. D. Gootz, L. J. Goodman, G. W. Parkhurst, J. P. Quinn, B. A. Martin, and G. M. Trenholme. 1992. High-level quinolone resistance in clinical isolates of Campylobacter jejuni. J. Infect. Dis. 165:667-670[Medline]. |
| 13. | Verardi, S., and V. Verardi. 1990. Bile rifaximin concentration after oral administration in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Farmaco 45:131-135[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»