AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martínez-Martínez, L.
Right arrow Articles by Perea, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martínez-Martínez, L.
Right arrow Articles by Perea, E. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2000, p. 2534-2536, Vol. 44, No. 9
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Activities of Imipenem and Cephalosporins against Clonally Related Strains of Escherichia coli Hyperproducing Chromosomal beta -Lactamase and Showing Altered Porin Profiles

L. Martínez-Martínez,1,2,* M. C. Conejo,1 A. Pascual,1,2 S. Hernández-Allés,3 S. Ballesta,1 E. Ramírez de Arellano-Ramos,2 V. J. Benedí,3 and E. J. Perea1,2

Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine,1 and University Hospital V. Macarena,2 Seville, and Area of Microbiology, Department of Biology, and IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB), University of Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca,3 Spain

Received 15 November 1999/Returned for modification 19 March 2000/Accepted 26 May 2000


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Forty clonally related clinical isolates of Escherichia coli from hospitalized patients were resistant to cefoxitin (MICs, >256 µg/ml) and ceftazidime (MICs, 32 to 256 µg/ml) and were intermediate or resistant to cefotaxime (MICs, 16 to 128 µg/ml) but susceptible to both cefepime (MICs, 0.5 to 2 µg/ml) and imipenem (MICs, 0.125 to 0.25 µg/ml). Resistance to beta -lactams was related to high-level production of AmpC beta -lactamase and loss of OmpF porin.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Most Escherichia coli strains do not produce clinically relevant levels of the chromosomally encoded AmpC beta -lactamase (4). Gene amplification or mutations at either the promoter and/or the attenuator of the structural beta -lactamase gene result in AmpC hyperproduction (2, 5, 11, 16, 20). This causes increased resistance to penicillins, cephalosporins, and beta -lactam-beta -lactamase inhibitor combinations. beta -Lactams penetrate into gram-negative bacteria throughout nonspecific porins (17). Two major porins have been described in E. coli: OmpF and OmpC (24). Loss of nonspecific porins in E. coli and other Enterobacteriaceae are related to increased levels of resistance to beta -lactams, particularly when combined with production of an efficient beta -lactamase(s) (1, 3, 8-10, 13, 21). Zwitterionic cephalosporins (cefepime, cefpirome, etc.) are more active against organisms producing increased levels of inducible chromosomal AmpC beta -lactamase than are older oxyimino-cephalosporins (cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, etc.) (7). We have, however, scarce information on the activity of zwitterionic cephalosporins against E. coli hyperproducing AmpC. In this study, we have evaluated the in vitro activities of imipenem and cephalosporins against clonally related clinical isolates of E. coli hyperproducing chromosomal beta -lactamase and the pattern of porin expression in these isolates.

Forty-four cefoxitin-resistant (MICs, >32 µg/ml) isolates of E. coli obtained from clinical samples (January to December 1994) have been studied. Forty isolates were obtained from inpatients, and four were obtained from outpatients. Identification and preliminary susceptibility testing were performed using commercial panels (panels 6P; Pasco). All 40 isolates from inpatients showed similar patterns of resistance to beta -lactams, fluoroquinolones, co-trimoxazole, and aminoglycosides. A variety of resistance patterns were observed in isolates from outpatients, none of them being identical to that of isolates from inpatients (data not shown). Genomic DNA from the 44 clinical isolates and from strain ATCC 25922 was separated after digestion with XbaI by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) as previously described (14). All 40 isolates from inpatients presented the same PFGE pattern, in contrast to the 4 isolates from outpatients and strain ATCC 25922, which showed patterns unrelated to each other and to that of isolates from inpatients (Fig. 1). The activities of cefoxitin (Sigma, Madrid, Spain), cefotaxime (Sigma), ceftriaxone (Sigma), ceftazidime (Glaxo, Madrid, Spain), cefepime (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Madrid, Spain), and imipenem (Merck Sharp and Dhome, Madrid, Spain) against all 44 isolates were determined by microdilution (15). MIC ranges and MICs at which 90% of isolates were inhibited, respectively, for the 40 isolates from inpatients were as follows (in micrograms per milliliter): >256 and >256 (cefoxitin); 0.5 to 2 and 2 (cefepime), 16 to 128 and 32 (both cefotaxime and ceftriaxone), 32 to 256 and 128 (ceftazidime), and 0.125 to 0.5 and 0.5 (imipenem). All strains were resistant to cefoxitin and ceftazidime, intermediate or resistant to cefotaxime and ceftriaxone, and susceptible to both cefepime and imipenem (15).


View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   PFGE profiles of E. coli clinical isolates hyperproducing chromosomal beta -lactamase. Lanes 1, 2, 7, and 8: markers. Lanes 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, and 12: isolates HUS4/94, HUS7/94, HUS23/94, HUS31/94, HUS34/94, HUS36/94, HUS42/94, and HUS47/94, respectively.

Eight isolates from hospitalized patients, including organisms covering the whole range of MICs of ceftazidime and cefotaxime for the 40 isolates from inpatients, were further studied. MICs of cephalosporins and imipenem were determined with Etest strips (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) in the presence of clavulanic acid (2 µg/ml) or BRL 42715 (4 µg/ml). A clinical strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae (HUS57/94) producing SHV-5 beta -lactamase (unpublished results) was used as a control in these studies. MICs of both cefoxitin and cefotaxime did not decrease in the presence of clavulanic acid. BRL 42715, however, significantly decreased the MICs of both cefoxitin and cefotaxime (Table 1). Both beta -lactamase inhibitors decreased the MIC of cefotaxime, but not of cefoxitin, for K. pneumoniae HUS57/94 (data not shown).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   MICs of cephalosporins and cephalosporins plus beta -lactamase inhibitorsa

Plasmid DNA was obtained by the alkaline-lysis method (12) and analyzed by electrophoresis in 0.7% agarose gels. All eight isolates contained a plasmid of 5.1 kb; isolate HUS23/94 additionally contained a plasmid of 8.0 kb. Attempts to transfer resistance to cephalosporins from isolates HUS31/94, HUS23/94, HUS36/94, and HUS47/94 to E. coli J53-2 (F- pro met Rifr) by conjugation, transformation (heat shock method), and electroporation, using ampicillin (50 µg/ml), cefoxitin (10 µg/ml), or cefotaxime (10 µg/ml) as selective agents (22), consistently failed. Although strains of E. coli producing AmpC-type beta -lactamase from plasmid have been described (6), these results suggest that the most probable cause of beta -lactam resistance in our isolates is of chromosomal origin.

Isoelectric point (pI) determinations using crude supernatants were performed by isoelectric focusing using the Phast-System (gel pI range, 3.5 to 9; Pharmacia, Sant Cugat del Vallés, Spain). All eight isolates produced a beta -lactamase with a pI of >= 9. Isolate HUS23/94 also produced a beta -lactamase with a pI of 5.4, compatible with TEM-1. beta -Lactamase activity was determined spectrophotometrically using crude supernatants from sonicated cells. One unit of activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that hydrolyzes 1 µmol of cephaloridine per min at 37°C. Inhibition of beta -lactamase was determined after preincubation (10 min at 37°C) of supernatants with cloxacillin (250 µM) or clavulanic acid (2 µM). Cloxacillin and clavulanic acid inhibited 88.7 to 99.6% and 0.6 to 8.1% of the beta -lactamase activity, except in isolate HUS23/94. Outer membrane protein profiles from bacteria grown to logarithmic phase in Mueller-Hinton broth or in nutrient broth were determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (12% acrylamide and 6 M urea in the running gel). OmpF porin was absent in the eight isolates grown in either Mueller-Hinton broth or nutrient broth (Fig. 2).


View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   Outer membrane protein profiles of E. coli clinical isolates HUS4/94 (lane 2), HUS7/94 (lane 3), HUS23/94 (lane 4), HUS31/94 (lane 5), HUS34/94 (lane 6), HUS36/94 (lane 7), HUS42/94 (lane 8), and HUS47/94 (lane 9). Lane 1: E. coli JF568 (OmpA+ OmpF+ OmpC+).

Hyperproduction of AmpC causing resistance of clinical isolates of E. coli to oxyimino-cephalosporins has been previously documented (2, 4, 16), but the epidemiological relationship of the strains included in those studies has not been reported. In this study we have shown that 40 isolates from inpatients were clonally related but epidemiologically unrelated to other AmpC-hyperproducing strains (data not shown) cultured from outpatients in the same geographical area. These 40 isolates presumably represent a single strain causing a nosocomial outbreak. Data on patients from whom the isolates were obtained are not available for a complete analysis, thus precluding an adequate epidemiological study.

The isolates described in this report were resistant to oxyimino-cephalosporins but susceptible to both cefepime and imipenem, two compounds highly stable to AmpC beta -lactamases from other enterobacteria (7). This study suggests that both cefepime and imipenem may represent a therapeutic alternative for infections caused by AmpC-hyperproducing E. coli strains, as suggested for other organisms (23). Loss of both OmpF and OmpC porins in laboratory mutants of E. coli determines an 8- to 16-fold increase in the MICs of cephalosporins (9). Loss of OmpF alone in E. coli mutants expressing increased amounts of AmpC determines a two- to fourfold increase in the MICs of cephalosporins (10). There is scarce information on the number and nature of porins expressed by clinical isolates of E. coli, and the relationship of porin expression, if any, with antimicrobial resistance. Reguera et al. (21) reported that seven out of eight clinical strains of E. coli resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid expressed only OmpC or expressed OmpF with altered electrophoretic mobility. In order to evaluate the role of porins in antimicrobial resistance, it would be necessary to compare Omp profiles and susceptibility data of bacteria cultured in the same medium. OmpF, an important porin for beta -lactam penetration (18, 19), is not expressed in high-osmolarity media, such as Mueller-Hinton broth, the most commonly used medium for susceptibility testing. In the isolates herein studied, we have observed that OmpF is not expressed in Mueller-Hinton broth (as would be expected); nor is it expressed in the low-osmolarity medium nutrient broth, suggesting that this porin is actually not expressed by these isolates. This also suggests that resistance due to cooperation between beta -lactamase production and altered permeability demonstrated in laboratory mutants of E. coli can also be expressed by clinical isolates.

The level of resistance to cephalosporins varied in different (but clonally related) isolates. It does not seem probable that variations in beta -lactamase activity accounts for the differences in susceptibility to cefotaxime and ceftazidime. This is suggested by both the poor correlation between enzyme activity and MICs (even if strain HUS23/94 is not considered) and by the differences of MICs of cefoxitin and cefotaxime in the presence of BRL 42715. It is possible that other mechanisms (penicillin-binding protein expression, active efflux, etc.) contribute to the observed phenotypes of resistance. New studies are in progress to evaluate these possibilities.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Janet Dawson in the preparation of the manuscript.

This work was supported in part by grants from Consolidation of Research Groups, Consejería de Educación, Junta de Andalucía, to L.M.-M., A.P. and E.J.P. and the Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología, Ministerio de Educación, Spain (grant PB96-0197) to V.J.B.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Seville, Apdo. 914, 41080 Seville, Spain. Phone: 34-95-5008287. Fax: 34-95-4377413. E-mail: lmartin{at}cica.es.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Bradford, P. A., C. Urban, N. Mariano, S. J. Projan, J. J. Rahal, and K. Bush. 1997. Imipenem resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae is associated with the combination of ACT-1, a plasmid-mediated AmpC beta -lactamase, and the loss of an outer membrane protein. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:563-569[Abstract].
2. Caroff, N., E. Espaze, I. Berard, H. Richet, and A. Reynaud. 1999. Mutations in the ampC promoter of Escherichia coli isolates resistant to oxyiminocephalosporins without extended spectrum beta-lactamase production. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 173:459-465[Medline].
3. Chow, J. W., and D. M. Shlaes. 1991. Imipenem resistance associated with the loss of a 40 kDa outer membrane protein in Enterobacter aerogenes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 28:499-504[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Cooksey, R., J. Swenson, N. Clark, E. Gay, and C. Thornsberry. 1990. Patterns and mechanisms of beta -lactamase resistance among isolates of Escherichia coli from hospitals in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:739-745[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Edlund, T., T. Grundstrom, and S. Normark. 1979. Isolation and characterization of DNA repetitions carrying the chromosomal beta -lactamase gene of Escherichia coli K12. Mol. Gen. Genet. 173:115-125[CrossRef][Medline].
6. Fosberry, A. P., D. J. Payne, E. J. Lawlor, and J. E. Hodgson. 1994. Cloning and sequence analysis of blaBIL-1, a plasmid-mediated class C beta -lactamase gene in Escherichia coli BS. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:1182-1185[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Fung-Tomc, J. C. 1997. Fourth-generation cephalosporins. Clin. Microbiol. Newsl. 19:129-136.
8. Hiraoka, M., R. Okamoto, M. Inoue, and S. Mitsuhashi. 1989. Effects of beta -lactamases and omp mutation on susceptibility to beta -lactam antibiotics in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33:382-386[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Jacoby, G. A., and L. Sutton. 1985. beta -Lactamases and beta -lactam resistance in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 28:703-705[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. Jacoby, G. A., and I. Carreras. 1990. Activities of beta -lactam antibiotics against Escherichia coli strains producing extended-spectrum beta -lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:858-862[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Jaurin, B., T. Grundström, T. Edlund, and S. Normark. 1981. The E. coli beta -lactamase attenuator mediates growth-dependent regulation. Nature 290:221-225[CrossRef][Medline].
12. Kado, C. I., and S. T. Liu. 1981. Rapid procedure for detection and isolation of large and small plasmids. J. Bacteriol. 145:1365-1373[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Martínez-Martínez, L., A. Pascual, S. Hernández-Allés, A. I. Suárez, J. Tran, V. J. Benedí, and G. A. Jacoby. 1999. Role of beta -lactamases and porins in the activity of carbapenems and cephalosporins against Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1657-1661[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Maslow, J. N., A. M. Slutsky, and R. D. Arbeit. 1993. Application of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to molecular epidemiology, p. 563-572. In D. H. Persing, T. F. Smith, F. C. Tenover, and T. J. White (ed.), Diagnostic molecular microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
15. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, fourth ed. Approved standard M7-A4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
16. Nelson, E. C., and B. G. Elisha. 1999. Molecular basis of AmpC hyperproduction in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:957-959[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17. Nikaido, H. 1989. Outer membrane barrier as a mechanism of antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33:1831-1836[Free Full Text].
18. Nikaido, H., W. Liu, and E. Y. Rosenberg. 1990. Outer membrane permeability and beta-lactamase stability of dipolar ionic cephalosporins containing methoxyimino substituents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:337-342[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19. Nikaido, H., E. Y. Rosenberg, and J. Foulds. 1983. Porin chanels in Escherichia coli: studies with beta -lactams in intact cells. J. Bacteriol. 153:232-240[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20. Olsson, O., S. Bergstrom, and S. Normark. 1982. Identification of a novel AmpC beta -lactamase promoter in a clinical isolate of Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 1:1411-1416[Medline].
21. Reguera, J. A., F. Baquero, J. C. Pérez-Díaz, and J. L. Martínez. 1991. Factors determining resistance to beta -lactams combined with beta -lactamase inhibitors in Escherichia coli. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 27:569-575[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed., p. 1.74-1.84. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
23. Sanders, W. E., J. H. Tenney, and R. E. Kessler. 1996. Efficacy of cefepime in the treatment of infections due to multiply resistant Enterobacter species. Clin. Infect. Dis. 23:454-461[Medline].
24. Schmitges, C. J., and U. Henning. 1976. The major proteins of the E. coli outer cell-envelope membrane. Heterogeneity of protein 1. Eur. J. Biochem. 63:47-52[Medline].


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2000, p. 2534-2536, Vol. 44, No. 9
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martínez-Martínez, L.
Right arrow Articles by Perea, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martínez-Martínez, L.
Right arrow Articles by Perea, E. J.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS