Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2000, p. 2575-2577, Vol. 44, No. 9
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Anti-Toxoplasma Activities of Antiretroviral
Drugs and Interactions with Pyrimethamine and Sulfadiazine In
Vitro
Francis
Derouin* and
Maud
Santillana-Hayat
Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie,
Faculté de Médecine
Hôpital Saint-Louis, 75006 Paris, France
Received 20 March 2000/Returned for modification 15 May
2000/Accepted 8 June 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The anti-Toxoplasma activities of nine
antiretroviral drugs were examined in vitro. Nucleoside analogs had no
effect on parasite growth, whereas ritonavir and nelfinavir were
inhibitory for Toxoplasma, with 50% inhibitory
concentrations of 5.4 and 4.0 µg/ml, respectively. None of the
antiviral drugs affected the anti-Toxoplasma
activity of pyrimethamine or sulfadiazine.
 |
TEXT |
In human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV)-infected patients, the recommended treatment or prophylaxis for
toxoplasmic encephalitis is a combination of a sulfonamide and a
dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor (8, 13). An
additional therapeutic benefit can also be expected from antiretroviral
therapy through the restoration of host antimicrobial immunity.
However, one study showed that azidovudine (AZT) negatively interfered
with the antiparasitic effect of pyrimethamine (7); in
contrast, didanosine (ddI) was found to have in vitro and in vivo
activity against Toxoplasma gondii (12).
Thus, our objective was to extend these studies by testing the
anti-Toxoplasma activities of five nucleoside
analogs and four protease inhibitors and their possible in vitro
interaction with pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine, as first-line
anti-Toxoplasma drugs.
We used tachyzoites of the virulent RH strain of T. gondii.
Tissue cultures and drug tests were carried out using MRC5 fibroblast tissue cultures as previously described, with quantification of Toxoplasma growth by enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (ELISA) (4). The following drugs were tested: AZT,
lamivudine, ddI, stavudine, zalcitabine, ritonavir, indinavir,
nelfinavir, and saquinavir. Stock solutions (10 mg/ml) were prepared in
distilled water, except for ritonavir, which was dissolved in methanol, and saquinavir, which was dissolved in 50% methanol-50% acetone. Pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine (Sigma) were dissolved at 1 mg/ml in
50% methanol-50% acetone. Serial dilutions were then prepared in
culture medium. Each antiviral drug was tested at serial concentrations ranging from 5 × 10
5 to 100 µg/ml (final
concentration). Each concentration was tested in eight replicate wells
and in two replicate culture plates. For assessing the interaction
between drugs, combinations of three concentrations of each
antiparasitic drug and four concentrations of each antiviral drug were
tested in a two-dimensional test. From the results of previous
experiments (4) and from individual tests of antiviral
drugs, we selected concentrations that resulted in a range of
inhibition from noninhibitory to completely inhibitory. For antiviral
drugs that had no anti-Toxoplasma activity, we
selected the highest concentration that was found to be nontoxic for
the monolayer and three fivefold dilutions of this concentration. Each
experiment used two or three replicate plates in which each drug or
drug combination was tested in four replicate wells. All experiments
were repeated twice. The effect of each drug at various concentrations
was described by plotting the optical density (OD) values generated by
the ELISA as a function of the logarithm of the concentration. A linear
regression model was used to summarize the concentration-effect
relationship and to determine the 50% inhibitory concentration
(IC50). The effect of the drugs in combination was tested
by using a two-way analysis of variance which included the estimation
of an interaction factor (4).
ddI, zalcitabine, stavudine, and lamivudine had no inhibitory effect on
Toxoplasma growth, and no toxicity to the monolayers was observed by microscopic examination. With AZT and indinavir, an
inhibitory effect was noted at 100 µg/ml without significant toxicity
to the host cells (Fig. 1A and B).
Saquinavir was inhibitory at concentrations of
20 µg/ml, which were
also found to be toxic for the monolayers. Ritonavir and nelfinavir
were inhibitory for Toxoplasma at concentrations of
<10 µg/ml (Fig. 1C and D). Both ritonavir and nelfinavir were
noninhibitory at concentrations of
2 µg/ml, and a marked increase
of the inhibitory effect was observed with between 2 and 10 µg/ml,
the concentration at which Toxoplasma growth was
completely inhibited. A toxic effect on the monolayers was noted with
nelfinavir at 20 µg/ml and with ritonavir at 40 µg/ml. The
IC50s were estimated to be 5.4 µg/ml (95% confidence
interval, 4.5 to 6.9 µg/ml) for ritonavir and 4.0 µg/ml (95%
confidence interval, 3.4 to 5.2 µg/ml) for nelfinavir.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
In vitro effect of antiviral drugs on T. gondii growth in MRC5 tissue culture. Each graph shows the OD
value (×1,000) from ELISA with infected monolayers (y axis)
versus drug concentration (x axis) for AZT (A), indinavir
(B), ritonavir (C), and nelfinavir (D).
|
|
With the two-way analysis of variance that was used for assessing the
drug combinations, the effect of each drug and the interaction effects
of drugs in combination were estimated, taking into account the
individual effect of each drug as well as the intra- and interplate variability. The synergistic effect of the combination of pyrimethamine with sulfadiazine was confirmed (Table
1), and combinations of one of the
antiretroviral drugs with pyrimethamine or sulfadiazine were analyzed.
For all combinations tested, there was no significant interaction
effect. Drugs that individually had no inhibitory effect against
T. gondii did not alter or enhance the
anti-Toxoplasma activity of sulfadiazine or
pyrimethamine. When antiretroviral drugs that were found to have an
inhibitory effect on T. gondii were combined with
pyrimethamine or sulfadiazine, an additional but not synergistic effect
resulted (Tables 2 and
3). We conclude that these antiviral
drugs had no interaction effect in vitro on the
anti-Toxoplasma activity of pyrimethamine or
sulfadiazine. In particular, we found no antagonistic effect between
AZT and pyrimethamine, as had been previously reported by Israelski et al. (7), and this was confirmed with four other nucleoside analogs.
Our study revealed that several antiretroviral drugs were inhibitory
for T. gondii. In contrast to Sarciron et al.
(12), we found no inhibitory effect with ddI at
concentrations up to 100 µg/ml. There is no clear explanation for
this discrepancy, except that we used a more virulent strain of
T. gondii and that cultures were prepared with fibroblasts
instead of phagocytic THP1 cells. We found that ritonavir and
nelfinavir were highly inhibitory for Toxoplasma
growth, with IC50s of 5.4 and 4.0 µg/ml, respectively
(i.e., concentrations that can be achieved in humans [5, 6, 9,
10]). The mode of action of HIV protease inhibitors on
T. gondii remains to be elucidated. Indeed, several proteases already have been found in protozoa (3, 11), but evidence of the target enzyme of HIV protease inhibitors, i.e., aspartyl protease, has not yet been found in T. gondii. Our
data suggest that this enzyme is present in T. gondii and
that it plays a role in parasitic replication. Recent data showing that
aspartyl protease is also present in fungi and can be inhibited by
anti-HIV protease inhibitors (1, 2) also indicate that this
enzyme could be a target for various microorganisms. In these other two studies, ritonavir was a potent inhibitor of Candida
albicans and Pneumocystis carinii, as we found in this
study for T. gondii. In addition to this direct
pharmacological effect on parasitic growth, ritonavir and nelfinavir
also may have an indirect effect on the host cell through enhancement
of the respiratory burst of neutrophils (D. Ghanimi, A. Perianin,
J. Morini, M. Levacher, I. Florentin, J. Giroud, and B. Rouveix, Abstr. 39th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents
Chemother., abstr. 1831, 1999). This mechanism could be of
particular importance for an intracellular parasite such as T. gondii.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire de
Parasitologie-Mycologie, Faculté de Médecine
Hôpital
Saint-Louis, 15 rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France.
Phone: 33 1 43 29 65 25. Fax: 33 1 43 29 51 92. E-mail:
paracord{at}wanadoo.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Atzori, C.,
E. Angeli,
A. Mainini,
F. Agostoni,
V. Micheli, and A. Cargnel.
2000.
In vitro activity of human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors against Pneumocystis carinii.
J. Infect. Dis.
181:1629-1634[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Cassone, A.,
F. De Bernadis,
A. Torosantucci,
E. Tacconelli,
M. Tumbarello, and R. Cauda.
1999.
In vitro and in vivo anticandidal activity of human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors.
J. Infect. Dis.
180:448-453[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Conseil, V.,
M. Soête, and J. F. Dubremetz.
1999.
Serine protease inhibitors block invasion of host cells by Toxoplasma gondii.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:1358-1361[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Derouin, F., and C. Chastang.
1989.
In vitro effects of folate inhibitors on Toxoplasma gondii.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
33:1753-1759[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Flexner, C.
1998.
HIV protease inhibitors.
N. Engl. J. Med.
338:1281-1292[Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Gatti, G.,
A. Di Biagio,
R. Casazza,
C. De Pascalis,
M. Bassetti,
M. Cruciani,
S. Vella, and D. Bassetti.
1999.
The relationship between ritonavir plasma levels and side-effects: implication for therapeutic drug monitoring.
AIDS
13:2083-2089[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Israelski, D. M.,
C. Tom, and J. S. Remington.
1989.
Zidovudine antagonizes the action of pyrimethamine in experimental infection with Toxoplasma gondii.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
33:30-34[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Luft, B. J., and J. S. Remington.
1992.
Toxoplasmic encephalitis.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
15:211-222[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Merry, C.,
M. G. Barry,
F. Mulcahy,
M. Ryan,
J. Heavey,
J. F. Tjia,
S. E. Gibbons,
A. M. Breckenridge, and D. J. Back.
1997.
Saquinavir pharmacokinetics alone and in combination with ritonavir in HIV-infected patients.
AIDS
11:F29-F33[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Pai, V. B., and M. C. Nahata.
1999.
Nelfinavir mesylate: a protease inhibitor.
Ann. Pharmacother.
33:325-339[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Rosenthal, P. J.
1999.
Proteases of protozoan parasites.
Adv. Parasitol.
43:105-159[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Sarciron, M.-E.,
P. Lawton,
C. Saccharin,
A.-F. Petavy, and F. Peyron.
1997.
Effects of 2',3'-dideoxyinosine on Toxoplasma gondii cysts in mice.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
41:1531-1536[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
USPHS/IDSA Prevention of Opportunistic Infections Working Group, and Infectious Diseases Society of America. 1999.
1999.
USPHS/IDSA guidelines for the prevention of opportunistic infections in persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus.
Ann. Intern. Med.
131:873-908[Free Full Text].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2000, p. 2575-2577, Vol. 44, No. 9
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Menotti, J., Santillana-Hayat, M., Cassinat, B., Sarfati, C., Derouin, F., Molina, J.-M.
(2005). Inhibitory Activity of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Aspartyl Protease Inhibitors against Encephalitozoon intestinalis Evaluated by Cell Culture-Quantitative PCR Assay. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 2362-2366
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Corvaisier, S., Charpiat, B., Mounier, C., Wallon, M., Leboucher, G., Al Kurdi, M., Chaulet, J.-F., Peyron, F.
(2004). Population Pharmacokinetics of Pyrimethamine and Sulfadoxine in Children Treated for Congenital Toxoplasmosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 3794-3800
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Atzori, C., Clerici, M., Trabattoni, D., Fantoni, G., Valerio, A., Tronconi, E., Cargnel, A.
(2003). Assessment of immune reconstitution to Pneumocystis carinii in HIV-1 patients under different highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens. J Antimicrob Chemother
52: 276-281
[Abstract]
[Full Text]