Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2001, p. 223-228, Vol. 45, No. 1
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.1.223-228.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
awomir
Milewski,1,*
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and
Biochemistry, Technical University of Gda
sk, Gda
sk,
Poland1; Department of Cellular,
Molecular and Animal Biology, University of Camerino, Camerino,
Italy2; and School of Life Sciences,
Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India3
Received 24 May 2000/Returned for modification 10 July 2000/Accepted 23 October 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The susceptibility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae JG436
multidrug transporter deletion mutant,
pdr5, to
several antifungal agents was compared to that of JG436-derived
JGCDR1 and JGCaMDR1 transformants, harboring the CDR1 and CaMDR1 genes,
encoding the main drug-extruding membrane proteins of
Candida albicans. The JGCDR1 and
JGCaMDR1 yeasts demonstrated markedly diminished
susceptibility to the azole antifungals, terbinafine and cycloheximide,
while that to amphotericin B was unchanged. Surprisingly,
JGCDR1 but not JGCaMDR1 cells showed enhanced
susceptibility to peptidic antifungals, rationally designed compounds
containing inhibitors of glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase. It was found
that these antifungal oligopeptides, as well as model oligopeptides
built of proteinogenic amino acids, were not effluxed from
JGCDR1 cells. Moreover, they were taken up by these
cells at rates two to three times higher than by JG436. The tested
oligopeptides were rapidly cleaved to constitutive amino acids by
cytoplasmic peptidases. Studies on the mechanism of the observed
phenomenon suggested that an additive proton motive force generated by
Cdr1p stimulated uptake of oligopeptides into JGCDR1 cells,
thus giving rise to the higher antifungal activity of FMDP
[N3-(4-methoxyfumaroyl)-L-2,3-diaminopropanoic
acid]-peptides.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The phenomenon of multidrug resistance is considered to be the major challenge for modern chemotherapy. Although better recognized and characterized in the case of cancer and bacterial cells, it is also becoming an emerging problem in antifungal chemotherapy, thus making worse the already difficult situation resulting from an increasing number of immunocompromised patients, the appearance of new human pathogenic fungi, and the very limited number of available antifungal chemotherapeutic agents (11). The molecular mechanism underlying the multidrug resistance is an overexpression of membrane proteins belonging to different classes of energy-dependent efflux pumps. Most of these proteins are the members of a family of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. A number of them have been already identified in fungi, including Cdr1p and Cdr2p in Candida albicans (30, 32) and Pdr5p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (2). Moreover, transporters of another type, the major facilitator superfamily (MFS), have been also detected, including a product of the CaMDR1 gene in C. albicans (6). The substrate spectrum of fungal multidrug transporters covers most of the drugs used in clinics for the treatment of disseminated infections, including fluconazole and itraconazole (1). On the other hand, the multidrug-resistant fungi retain in most cases the susceptibility to membrane-affecting agents: amphotericin B (31) and basic oligopeptides (13). This is in agreement with a general rule assuming that the "classical" substrate for drug-extruding pumps is a predominantly hydrophobic molecule, usually bearing a localized positive or negative charge, penetrating the cell membrane by free diffusion (36). However, some intracellularly acting antifungal compounds are transported into the cells by active transport systems. This group includes a known drug, 5-fluorocytosine (8), and several antifungal agents that have not reached clinics so far, including peptidic compounds, containing FMDP [N3-(4-methoxyfumaroyl)-L-2,3-diaminopropanoic acid], an inhibitor of glucosamine-6-phosphate (GlcN-6-P) synthase (24). Any data on the affinity of these compounds to multidrug efflux pumps have not been reported yet.
We present here the results of our recent studies on antifungal activity of FMDP-peptides against multidrug-resistant and drug-sensitive yeasts.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Antifungal agents and other chemicals.
Cycloheximide was
from Sigma, St. Louis, Mo. Fluconazole and tioconazole were from
Pfizer, Milano, Italy. Amphotericin B was from Bristol-Myers Squibb,
New York, N.Y., and terbinafine was from Sandoz, Ltd., Basel,
Switzerland. FMDP, Nva-FMDP, and Lys-Nva-FMDP were synthesized by R. Andruszkiewicz, Technical University of Gda
sk. All other
chemicals were from Sigma.
Yeast strains and growth conditions.
S. cerevisiae
ATCC 9763 cells were stored on Sabouraud agar slants and propagated in
Sabouraud liquid medium at 30°C with shaking. S. cerevisiae JG436 (MATa pdr5::Tn5
leu2 met5 ura3-52 mak71 KRB1) was a kind gift from J. Golin,
Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. This strain was
hypersensitive to cycloheximide and some other unrelated antifungal
agents (20). JG436 was transformed with
CaMDR1-carrying plasmid pNC39 and CDR1-carrying plasmid pS12, which had a common vector background of pYEUra3 (12, 30). The resulting JG436 transformants are designated as JGCaMDR1 and JGCDR1. The JG436 yeast cells were
propagated in a yeast nitrogen base-glucose (YNBG) minimal medium
containing 0.67% YNB without amino acids (Difco), 2% glucose,
L-methionine at 20 µg ml
1,
L-leucine at 40 µg ml
1, and uracil at 30 µg ml
1, while the transformant strains were maintained
in a similar medium but lacking uracil.
Antifungal susceptibility tests.
MICs were determined by the
serial twofold dilution method in 96-well microtiter plates in the
minimal YNBG medium described above for the JG436 strain. The inoculum
size was 104 cells ml
1. Plates were incubated
for 24 h at 30°C. The MIC was defined as the lowest drug
concentration preventing visible growth. Each compound was tested at
least three times. Determination of the pH dependence of the MIC was
performed in RPMI 1640 medium with glutamine, without sodium
bicarbonate but containing 2% glucose, buffered with 0.165 M MOPS
(morpholinepropanesulfonic acid), with the pH adjusted to the
appropriate level with 1 M HCl or 1 M NaOH (26). The
inoculum size, incubation conditions, and MIC definition were the same
as those described above.
Determination of peptide uptake rates.
Yeast cells grown
exponentially in YNBG medium were harvested by centrifugation
(3,000 × g, 5 min), washed with 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 5.0 or 6.5), and suspended in the same buffer containing 1% glucose to a final cell density corresponding to an
A660 of 1.0. The cell suspension was incubated
at 30°C. After 10 min, an oligopeptide solution was added to give a
final concentration of 100 µM. At that moment and at 5-min intervals
thereafter, 2-ml samples of the cell suspension were withdrawn and
immediately filtered through the Whatman GF/A filters, and the
filtrates were used to determine the residual peptide concentration.
Then, 1-ml portions of the filtrates were taken and combined with
1.25-ml aliquots of a solution containing 4%
Na2B4O7 · 10H2O
and 0.8 mg of 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonate (TNBS) ml
1.
The reaction was carried out at 37°C for 30 min. The
A420 value was measured, and the peptide
concentration was read from the appropriate standard curve. Data were
plotted as nanomoles of oligopeptide taken up by 1 mg (dry weight) of
cells versus time. The initial uptake velocities were determined from
the slopes of the linear part of the curves, in the 0- to 10-min region.
TLC. Qualitative analysis of the spent medium used for the determination of peptide uptake rate was performed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Small aliquots of filtrates were applied to silica gel-coated aluminum sheets. Chromatograms were developed in two solvent systems: system A, n-butanol-acetic acid-water (4:1:1), and system B, chloroform-ethanol (2:1). The amino acids and peptides were visualized by ninhydrin staining and FMDP-containing compounds by quenching of UV light.
Preparation of cell extract. Yeast cells from the overnight culture on YNBG were harvested by centrifugation and washed with cold 25 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5). Cells were then suspended in a minimal amount of the buffer and disrupted with French press. The resulting suspension was centrifuged (35,000 × g, 4°C, 45 min), and the supernatant was used as a cell extract for the determination of peptide cleavage rates.
Determination of peptide cleavage rates.
The incubation
mixtures, consisting of 10 ml of a 200 µM peptide solution in 50 mM
potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) and 2 ml of appropriately diluted
crude extract (final protein concentration, 0.1 to 0.5 mg
ml
1), were incubated at 30°C. At 5-min intervals, 2-ml
aliquots were withdrawn and heated at 100°C for 3 min. The resulting
suspensions were centrifuged to remove protein precipitates, and the
concentration of free amino acids in the supernatant was determined by
the Cd-ninhydrin procedure (9).
Determination of initial velocity of proton efflux.
The
initial velocities of proton extrusion by mutant yeast cells were
determined according to the procedure described previously (14). Briefly, yeast mutant cells grown in the YNBG medium
lacking uracil were harvested in the mid-exponential phase of growth, washed twice with water, and suspended in fresh, unbuffered water at
108 cells ml
1. Cell suspensions were
preincubated for 5 min at 30°C in a water-circulating chamber with
constant stirring. The incubation was continued, and the pH of the cell
suspensions was monitored with a PHM-62 pH meter (Radiometer,
Copenhagen, Denmark). The release of protons was recorded for 5 min.
The corresponding amount of proton released was then calculated after
we corrected for the buffer capacity of the yeast suspension, as
determined by the addition of a known amount of 10 mM HCl solution.
Other methods.
The protein concentration was measured by the
Bradford procedure (7), using bovine serum albumin as a
standard. The activity of GlcN-6-P synthase was assayed in cell
extracts according to a previously published method (18).
One unit of specific activity was defined as an amount of enzyme that
catalyzed formation of 1 µmol of GlcN-6-P h
1 mg of
protein
1.
| |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Genetically modified yeast mutant cells, JG436, lacking the main
yeast drug extruding pump Pdr5p and its transformants containing C. albicans genes encoding Cdr1p and CaMdr1p drug exporters,
respectively, can serve as useful research tools for studies on
substrate specificity of candidal drug efflux systems. We used these
transformants for the determination of in vitro growth inhibitory
activity of several antifungal agents. The results of this experiment
are shown in Table 1. As could be
expected, both JGCDR1 and JGCaMDR1 cells demonstrated reduced susceptibility to a number of antifungals compared
to the parent JG436 strain, while the activity of the membrane-active
antifungal compound amphotericin B was exactly the same against all
types of mutant cells. On the other hand, JGCDR1 yeast cells
demonstrated enhanced susceptibility to Nva-FMDP and
Lys-Nva-FMDP, whereas JGCaMDR1 was unchanged compared to
JG436. A similar phenomenon was also observed for other
FMDP-oligopeptides, containing two to four amino acid residues (data
not shown). The susceptibility of JG436 cells to antifungal agents
under study was the same or slightly higher than that of the standard
yeast strain ATCC 9763. The MIC values for FMDP-peptides against yeast transformants were two to four times lower, when the determination was
made in YNBG medium containing L-glutamate at 2 mg
ml
1, instead of ammonium sulfate as a nitrogen source
(data not shown). This difference probably reflects the nitrogen
catabolite repression of peptide transport systems, which is well known
and characterized in S. cerevisiae (5).
Moreover, it should be mentioned that FMDP-peptides are generally much
more active against human pathogenic fungi, especially C. albicans (23, 24), than against baker's yeast.
|
It was previously shown that FMDP-peptides are transported into
C. albicans cells by peptide permeases and cleaved
intracellularly by peptidases, and the released FMDP inhibits activity
of the enzyme L-glutamine:D-fructose
6-phosphate amidotransferase (EC 2.6.1.16, known as GlcN-6-P synthase)
(24). In consequence, the biosynthesis of the
glucosamine-containing cell wall macromolecules, chitin and
mannoprotein, is inhibited (24). It was also evidenced that the relative rates of uptake of an oligopeptide antifungal agents
determine their anticandidal activity (22). Therefore, trying to find an explanation for unusual susceptibility of
JGCDR1 yeast to FMDP-peptides, we determined the uptake rates
of these compounds and a few oligopeptides built exclusively of
proteinogenic amino acids by JG436 transformants cells. Determinations
of uptake rates of small molecules into microbial cells are usually
made using radiolabeled compounds. However, it is known that in the case of oligopeptides this approach may result in false results due to
the efflux of degradation products containing radioisotopes (28). We used our own method based on the colorimetric
assay of yellow products of reaction between peptides and TNBS
(23). This approach is based upon the assumption that a
peptide is the only compound reacting with TNBS that is present in the
external medium. Therefore, our experiment was carried out in a
phosphate-buffered glucose solution, and no amino group-containing
compounds were added except the tested oligopeptide. The examined
peptides were continuously taken up by all tested types of yeast
mutants. The uptake was linear for at least 15 to 20 min, and then its
velocity gradually decreased, thus reflecting the influence of
decreasing concentration of the oligopeptide in the medium. The initial
uptake velocities of several oligopeptides by JG436 and
JGCDR1 cells, determined from the slopes of the linear part
of the experimental curves, are demonstrated in Table
2. The results show that all tested
oligopeptides were taken up by CDR1-expressing
JGCDR1 cells at higher rates than by JG436 yeast lacking
Cdr1p. On the other hand, the oligopeptide uptake by both yeast
transformants was faster at pH 5.0 than at pH 6.5. This finding is
consistent with the previous report on properties of yeast oligopeptide
transport systems (4). It is also noteworthy that the
differences between the uptake rates exhibited by JGCDR1 and
JG436 were in most cases larger at pH 6.5 than at pH 5.0. The initial
velocities of oligopeptide uptake by JGCaMDR1 cells were
almost identical at both pH values to those demonstrated by JG436.
|
FMDP was very slowly taken up by yeast mutants. The initial velocities
of its uptake were within the range of 0.1 to 0.3 nmol min
1 mg (dry weight)
1.
The TLC analysis revealed that the tested oligopeptides were the only ninhydrin-positive compounds present in the spent media. No spots corresponding to the constitutive amino acids were detected. We did not also detect any UV light-absorbing compounds in the spent medium separated from cells treated with Nva-FMDP or Lys-Nva-FMDP, except the FMDP-oligopeptides themselves. Nevertheless, some especially fast-absorbed oligopeptides (e.g., His-Met or Leu-Leu-Leu) were completely removed from the medium after 20 to 30 min, when no compound reacting with TNBS could be detected any longer. The same was true after 40 to 50 min for FMDP-peptides, which were taken up at lower rates. Moreover, the shapes of all experimental curves obtained by us in uptake experiments were similar, a result characteristic for the continuous inward transport by permease, and not affected by any efflux phenomena. We can therefore conclude that neither the tested oligopeptides nor their constitutive amino acids were effluxed from the yeast JG436 and its CDR1 and CaMDR1 transformants.
It was previously shown that the effectiveness of anticandidal action
of FMDP-peptides is influenced by three factors: the velocity of
uptake, the rate of intracellular cleavage, and the affinity for the
intracellular target, with the first factor being crucial for the
overall activity (24). We therefore determined the rates
of cleavage of Nva-FMDP and Lys-Nva-FMDP by peptidases present in cell
extracts prepared from mutant yeast. The results of this experiment
shown in Table 3 clearly demonstrate that the rates were practically the same, irrespectively of the source of
the cell extract used for determination. On the other hand, the
cleavage rates were much higher than the corresponding uptake velocities shown in Table 2. The TLC analysis of solutions containing FMDP-peptides (100 µM) incubated at 30°C in the presence of crude extracts (protein concentration, 1 mg ml
1) confirmed a
very quick release of free amino acids. Spots corresponding to FMDP
appeared as quickly as within 45 to 60 s. One may doubt whether
the results of this in vitro experiment can be related to the
intracellular conditions. However, a very fast cleavage of different
oligopeptides internalized by yeast cells was previously demonstrated
(4, 17), and a correlation between results obtained under
in vitro and in vivo conditions was also shown (25).
|
There was no difference in the specific activity of GlcN-6-P synthase present in cell extracts prepared from yeast mutants and the sensitivity of this enzyme to inhibition by FMDP. The specific activity of the enzyme was 0.046 ± 0.003 U, and the 50% inhibitory concentration for FMDP was 7.5 ± 0.2 µM. It is therefore clear that neither the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis nor the interaction of FMDP with its intracellular target influence the growth-inhibitory activity of FMDP-peptides against yeast mutants. This seems to be exclusively determined by the inward transport rates. A similar conclusion was previously drawn for the anticandidal activity of FMDP-peptides (23) and some other peptidic antifungals (22).
Since we observed that the FMDP-peptide uptake rate was pH dependent
(Table 2), it seemed reasonable to establish the pH dependence of the
antiyeast activity of FMDP-peptides. This was done by determining the
MICs in buffered RPMI media. The medium composition and conditions of
this assay were in compliance with recommendations of the National
Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (26). The
results (Fig. 1) clearly demonstrate that the growth-inhibitory activity of FMDP-peptides against both JG436 and
JGCDR1 cells was strongly enhanced in acidic media. A similar phenomenon was also observed for JGCaMDR1 (data not shown).
|
Oligopeptides containing two to six amino acid residues are transported
into C. albicans and S. cerevisiae cells by
energy-dependent permeases. The extensive studies on peptide
transport system in C. albicans led to the
identification and characterization of at least two components: the di-
and tripeptide permease and the oligopeptide permease
transporting tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexapeptides (3, 5,
21, 23). In S. cerevisiae, a product of the
PTR2 gene was unequivocally identified as a di- and
tripeptide permease, with very low affinity for longer oligopeptides
(29). The molecular mechanism of peptide translocation by
Ptr2p is not known, but the pH dependence of its activity, with a pH
optimum of 5.5 (16) and a sequence homology to other
members of the PTR family of transport proteins (35),
indicate that this permease acts as an H+-oligopeptide
symporter. We were able to confirm this assumption by demonstrating the
strong inhibitory effect of the known proton shuttle, carbonyl cyanide
m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) on peptide uptake by yeast
mutants and their transformants (Fig. 2).
The presence of this agent (100 µM) practically completely stopped the oligopeptide uptake.
|
The only difference between JG436 and JGCDR1 cells is the
presence of the Cdr1p efflux pump in the latter. It is therefore clear
that the unusually high susceptibility of the JGCDR1 cells to
FMDP-peptides should be a consequence of a possible activity of this
ABC transporter. One of the theoretical suggestions for the mechanism
of this phenomenon could be the action of Cdr1p as an additional
oligopeptide permease. This idea seemed very unlikely since this
protein is known to act exclusively as an export pump, but experimental
verification was required. Such evidence was provided by the results of
the experiment in which the growth-inhibitory activity of FMDP-peptides
and cycloheximide was determined in the presence of the calcium channel
blocker, verapamil, which is known to be a very good substrate for
P-glycoprotein (37). The data presented in Table
4 show that the presence of this compound
strongly increases the susceptibility of JGCDR1 cells to the
action of cycloheximide and has no effect on susceptibility of JG436
yeast. This result was expected since Cdr1p blocked by verapamil was
supposed to be switched off as a potential way of cycloheximide efflux.
On the other hand, verapamil had no effect on the antifungal activity
of FMDP-peptides against JG436 and JGCDR1. No effect was also
observed in the case of JGCaMDR1 cells (data not shown).
We did not note any substantial influence of verapamil on oligopeptide
uptake to yeast transformants, except the very slight stimulation of
their uptake in the case of JGCDR1 cells (Fig. 2). Any
competition between FMDP-peptides and verapamil for Cdr1p can therefore
be excluded.
|
Another possibility which may be taken into account as a probable
mechanism of observed supersensitivity is the creation of an additional
driving force for peptide transport due to the presence of Cdr1p. This
protein is a C. albicans homologue of the human Mdr1p efflux
pump (30), well known as a P-glycoprotein. This is
therefore likely that the substrate specificity of both drug exporters
should be similar. In this respect, it is worth mentioning that
P-glycoprotein is known to export some peptides. However, we must
stress that this opinion concerns some very specific compounds, e.g.,
ionophoric peptides such as gramicidin and valinomycin or hydrophobic
cyclic and linear modified peptides or peptide derivatives such as
NAc-L-leucyl-L-leucyl-L-methioninal,
pepstatin A, cyclosporin A, or leupeptin (33, 34).
Ionophoric peptides were also shown to be the substrates for yeast
Pdr5p (19). Small, unmodified linear peptides have never
been studied in this respect. On the other hand, Fritz et al. reported
quite recently that human Mdr1p (P-glycoprotein) overexpressed in
S. cerevisiae, acts at low external pH as a H+
efflux and Cl
influx pump, whereas at a pH of >8 it
promotes ion translocation in the opposite directions
(10). It was even suggested that biophysical perturbations
due to abnormal ion transport might be a natural activity of this
protein and the multidrug resistance phenotype could be fully explained
by changes in the membrane potential and proton gradient generated by
human Mdr1p (15). The structural homology between Cdr1p
and human P-glycoprotein allows us to put forward a working
hypothesis that Cdr1p expressed in S. cerevisiae may
also create an additional proton motive force. This should in turn
drive the oligopeptide transport by an H+-dependent peptide
permease and thus enhance the antifungal activity of FMDP-peptides. In
order to verify this hypothesis we determined the initial velocities of
proton efflux from yeast mutant cells suspended in unbuffered water.
The results of this experiment (Fig. 3)
clearly demonstrate that the JGCDR1 cells effluxed almost three times more protons per minute than did the JG436 and
JGCaMDR1 cells. Our hypothesis has been additionally
strengthened by an identical growth-inhibitory activity of
FMDP-peptides against JG436 and JGCaMDR1 and
similar uptake rates of oligopeptides by both transformant
cells. The drug efflux pump CaMdr1p present in JGCaMDR1
belongs to the MFS of drug exporters. The MFS proteins act as
H+-substrate antiporters (27), so that their
action cannot create any additional proton motive force. Since, on the
other hand, our data show that CaMdr1p extrudes neither FMDP-peptides
nor their constitutive amino acids, it is not surprising that the presence of this pump has no effect on antifungal activity of FMDP-peptides.
|
To our best knowledge, FMDP-peptides are the first reported example of antimicrobial agents that are more active against multidrug-resistant cells. Although the hypothesis on the molecular mechanism of this supersensitivity needs further experimental evidence, the phenomenon itself seems to open the new possibilities of overcoming the multidrug resistance problem. In our opinion this could be done by the application of structural mimics of natural metabolites: peptides, amino acids, or sugars as antimicrobial agents. Such compounds are transported unidirectionally into the cells by respective permeases and are less likely to be extruded by drug efflux pumps than xenobiotics. Moreover, our results presented above indicate that, at least in some cases, i.e., agents transported into the cells by H+-substrate symporters, there is a chance for the paradoxically enhanced susceptibility of potentially "resistant" cells. Work is in progress in our laboratory to verify this hypothesis.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The partial financial support of these studies by Chemical
Faculty of the Technical University of Gda
sk and University of Camerino is gratefully acknowledged.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department
of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biochemistry, Technical University
of Gda
sk, 11/12 Narutowicza St., 80-952 Gda
sk,
Poland. Phone: 48-58-3472107. Fax: 48-58-3472694. E-mail:
milewski{at}altis.chem.pg.gda.pl.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Albertson, G. D., M. Niimi, R. D. Cannon, and H. F. Jenkinson. 1996. Multiple efflux mechanisms are involved in Candida albicans fluconazole resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2835-2840[Abstract]. |
| 2. |
Balzi, E.,
M. Wang,
S. Leterme,
L. Van Dyck, and A. Goffeau.
1994.
PDR5, a novel yeast multidrug resistance conferring transporter controlled by the transcription regulator PDR1.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:2206-2214 |
| 3. | Basrai, M. A., M. A. Lubkowitz, J. R. Perry, D. Miller, E. Krainer, F. Naider, and J. M. Becker. 1995. Cloning of a Candida albicans peptide transport gene. Microbiology 141:1147-1156[Abstract]. |
| 4. | Becker, J. M., and F. Naider. 1977. Peptide transport in yeast: uptake of radioactive trimethionine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 178:245-255[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. | Becker, J. M., and F. Naider. 1995. Fungal peptide transport as a drug delivery system, p. 369-384. In M. Taylor, and G. Amidon (ed.), Peptide-based drug design: controlling transport and metabolism. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. |
| 6. |
Ben-Yaacov, R.,
S. Knoller,
G. A. Caldwell,
J. M. Becker, and Y. Koltin.
1994.
The Candida albicans gene encoding resistance to benomyl and methotrexate is a multidrug resistance gene.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38:648-652 |
| 7. | Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein using the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248-254[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | Diasio, R. B., J. E. Bennett, and C. E. Myers. 1978. Mode of action of 5-fluorocytosine. Biochem. Pharmacol. 27:703-707[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. | Doi, E., D. Shibata, and T. Matoba. 1981. Modified colorimetric ninhydrin method for peptidase assay. Anal. Biochem. 118:173-184[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. | Fritz, F., E. M. Howard, M. M. Hoffman, and P. D. Roepe. 1999. Evidence for altered ion transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae overexpressing human MDR 1 protein. Biochemistry 38:4214-4226[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. |
Ghannoum, M. A., and L. B. Rice.
1999.
Antifungal agents: mode of action, mechanisms of resistance, and correlation of these mechanisms with bacterial resistance.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
12:501-517 |
| 12. | Gupta, V., A. Kohli, S. Krishnamurthy, N. Puri, S. A. Aalamger, S. Panwar, and R. Prasad. 1998. Identification of polymorphic mutant alleles of CaMDR1, a major facilitator of Candida albicans which confers multidrug resistance, and its in vitro transcriptional activation. Curr. Genet. 34:192-199[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. |
Helmerhorst, E. J.,
I. M. Reijnders,
W. van't Hoff,
I. Simoons-Smit,
E. C. Veerman, and A. V. Amerongen.
1999.
Amphotericin B- and fluconazole-resistant Candida spp., Aspergillus fumigatus, and other newly emerging pathogenic fungi are susceptible to basic antifungal peptides.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:702-704 |
| 14. | Hofer, M., and P. C. Misra. 1978. Evidence for a proton/sugar symport in the yeast Rhodotorula gracilis (glutinis). Biochem. J. 172:15-22[Medline]. |
| 15. |
Hoffman, M. M.,
W. Li-Yong, and P. D. Roepe.
1996.
Are altered pHi and membrane potential in hu MDR 1 transfectants sufficient to cause MDR protein-mediated multidrug resistance?
J. Gen. Physiol.
108:295-313 |
| 16. | Horak, J. 1997. Yeast nutrient transporters. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1331:41-79[Medline]. |
| 17. |
Island, M. D.,
F. Naider, and J. M. Becker.
1987.
Regulation of dipeptide transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by micromolar amino acid concentration.
J. Bacteriol.
169:2132-2136 |
| 18. | Kenig, M., E. Vandamme, and E. P. Abraham. 1976. The mode of action of bacilysin and anticapsin and biochemical properties of bacilysin-resistant mutants. J. Gen. Microbiol. 94:46-54[Medline]. |
| 19. |
Kolaczkowski, M.,
M. V. Rest,
A. C. Kolaczkowska,
J. P. Soumillion,
W. N. Konings, and A. Goffeau.
1996.
Anticancer drugs, ionophoric peptides and steroids as substrates of the yeast multidrug transporter Pdr5.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:31543-31548 |
| 20. | Leppert, G., R. Mc Devitt, S. C. Falco, T. K. Van Dyk, M. B. Ficke, and J. Golin. 1990. Cloning by gene amplification of two loci conferring multiple drug resistance. Genetics 125:13-20[Abstract]. |
| 21. | Lubkowitz, M. A., I. Hauser, M. Breslav, F. Naider, and J. M. Becker. 1997. An oligopeptide transport gene from Candida albicans. Microbiology 143:387-396[Abstract]. |
| 22. |
McCarthy, P. J.,
D. J. Newman,
L. J. Nisbet, and W. D. Kingsbury.
1985.
Relative rates of transport of peptidyl drugs by Candida albicans.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
28:494-499 |
| 23. | Milewski, S., R. Andruszkiewicz, and E. Borowski. 1988. Substrate specificity of peptide permeases in Candida albicans. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 50:73-78[CrossRef]. |
| 24. |
Milewski, S.,
R. Andruszkiewicz,
L. Kasprzak,
J. Mazerski,
F. Mignini, and E. Borowski.
1991.
Mechanism of action of anticandidal dipeptides containing inhibitors of glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
35:36-43 |
| 25. | Moneton, P., P. Sarthou, and F. LeGoffic. 1986. Transport and hydrolysis of peptides in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Gen. Microbiol. 132:2147-2153[Medline]. |
| 26. | National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing for yeast: proposed standards. Document M27-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa. |
| 27. |
Paulsen, I. I.,
M. H. Brown, and R. A. Skurray.
1996.
Proton-dependent multidrug efflux systems.
Microbiol. Rev.
60:575-608 |
| 28. | Payne, J. W., and T. M. Nisbet. 1980. Limitations to the use of radioactively labelled substrates for studying peptide transport in microorganisms. FEBS Lett. 119:73-76[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 29. |
Perry, J. R.,
M. A. Basrai,
H.-Y. Steiner,
F. Naider, and J. M. Becker.
1994.
Isolation and characterization of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae peptide transport gene.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:104-115 |
| 30. | Prasad, R., P. De Wergifosse, A. Goffeau, and E. Balzi. 1995. Molecular cloning and characterisation of a novel gene of Candida albicans, CDR1, conferring multiple resistance to drugs and antifungals. Curr. Genet. 27:320-329[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 31. | Sanglard, D., F. Ischer, M. Monod, and J. Bille. 1996. Susceptibilities of Candida albicans multidrug transporter mutants to various antifungal agents and other metabolic inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2300-2305[Abstract]. |
| 32. | Sanglard, D., F. Ischer, M. Monod, and J. Bille. 1997. Cloning of Candida albicans genes conferring resistance to azole antifungal agents: characterisation of CDR2, a new multidrug ABC transport gene. Microbiology 143:405-416[Abstract]. |
| 33. |
Sharom, F. J.,
G. DiDonato,
X. Yu, and K. J. D. Ashbourne.
1995.
Interaction of the P-glycoprotein multidrug transporter with peptides and ionophores.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:10334-10341 |
| 34. | Sharom, F. J., P. Lu, R. Liu, and X. Yu. 1998. Linear and cyclic peptides as substrates and modulators of P-glycoprotein: peptide binding and effects on drug transport and accumulation. Biochem. J. 333:621-630. |
| 35. | Steiner, H.-Y., F. Naider, and J. M. Becker. 1995. The PTR family: a new group of peptide transporters. Mol. Microbiol. 16:825-834[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 36. |
White, T. C.,
K. A. Marr, and R. A. Bowden.
1998.
Clinical, cellular, and molecular factors that contribute to antifungal drug resistance.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
11:382-402 |
| 37. |
Yusa, K., and T. Tsuruo.
1989.
Reversal mechanism of multidrug resistance by verapamil. Direct binding of verapamil to P-glycoprotein on specific sites and transport of verapamil outward across the plasma membrane of K562/ADM cells.
Cancer Res.
49:5002-5006 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |