Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2001, p. 2733-2739, Vol. 45, No. 10
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.10.2733-2739.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Phase I/II Trial of the Pharmacokinetics, Safety,
and Antiretroviral Activity of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in
Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Adults
Patricia
Barditch-Crovo,1,*
Steven G.
Deeks,2
Ann
Collier,3
Sharon
Safrin,4
Dion F.
Coakley,5
Michael
Miller,5
Brian P.
Kearney,5
Rebecca L.
Coleman,5
Patrick D.
Lamy,5
James O.
Kahn,2
Ian
McGowan,5 and
Paul S.
Lietman1
The Johns Hopkins University School of
Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland1; San
Francisco General Hospital AIDS Program, University of California, San
Francisco,2 and Gilead Sciences,
Inc.,5 Foster
City,4 California; and University of
Washington, Seattle, Washington3
Received 25 January 2001/Returned for modification 26 April
2001/Accepted 11 July 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Tenofovir DF is an antiviral nucleotide with activity against human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). The pharmacokinetics, safety,
and activity of oral tenofovir DF in HIV-1-infected adults were
evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, escalating-dose study of four doses (75, 150, 300, and 600 mg given
once daily). Subjects received a single dose of tenofovir DF or a
placebo, followed by a 7-day washout period. Thereafter, subjects
received their assigned study drug once daily for 28 days.
Pharmacokinetic parameters were dose proportional and demonstrated no
change with repeated dosing. Reductions in plasma HIV-1 RNA were dose
related at tenofovir DF doses of 75 to 300 mg, but there was no
increase in virus suppression between the 300- and 600-mg dose cohorts,
despite dose-proportional increases in drug exposure. Grade III or IV
adverse events were limited to laboratory abnormalities, including
elevated creatine phosphokinase and liver function tests, which
resolved with or without drug discontinuation and without sequelae. No
patients developed detectable sequence changes in the reverse
transcriptase gene.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Tenofovir
{9-[(R)-2-(phosphonomethoxy)propyl]adenine}, formerly
known as PMPA, is a novel nucleotide analog belonging to the class of
acyclic nucleoside phosphonates. When administered tenofovir as late as
24 h after intravenous inoculation of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), rhesus monkeys were completely protected against acute
infection (10, 11). Tenofovir has also demonstrated substantial efficacy in the treatment of chronically infected macaque
monkeys (12, 13). When given intravenously to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected people for 7 consecutive days, tenofovir was well tolerated and demonstrated significant dose-related anti-HIV-1 activity (3). However, tenofovir
demonstrated low oral bioavailability in animal studies. Therefore, a
prodrug of tenofovir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir
DF)
{9-[(R)-2-[[bis[[(isopropoxycarbonyl)oxy]methoxy]phosphinyl]methoxy]propyl]adenine fumarate}; characterized by an advantageous pharmacokinetic profile and therapeutic index was chosen for clinical development (2, 8).
Tenofovir is metabolized intracellularly to its active metabolite,
tenofovir diphosphate, which is a competitive inhibitor of HIV-1
reverse transcriptase (RT) that terminates the growing DNA chain.
Tenofovir diphosphate, which is active in both resting and activated
cells, has a prolonged intracellular half-life that ranges from 12 to
50 h (7). This long intracellular half-life allows
infrequent administration. Additionally, tenofovir shows a favorable in
vitro resistance profile. Serial passage of an HIV-1 isolate in the
presence of increasing concentrations of tenofovir resulted in the
emergence of a HIV-1 mutant with a K65R substitution in the RT gene; a
recombinant virus expressing HIV-1 RT with the K65R mutation showed an
only threefold decrease in tenofovir susceptibility compared to that of
the wild-type virus (14). Tenofovir retains activity
against a variety of drug-resistant HIV-1 strains in vitro (9,
14). Lamivudine (3TC)-resistant viruses, which carry the M184V
mutation, demonstrate approximately twofold increased susceptibility to
tenofovir in vitro (5). In vitro testing of tenofovir in
combination with other antiretroviral compounds (adefovir, 3TC,
zidovudine [AZT], didanosine, stavudine [d4T], saquinavir,
ritonavir, nelfinavir, indinavir, abacavir, amprenavir, nevirapine, and
delavirdine) demonstrated additive or synergistic activity; no
significant antiviral antagonism was observed (6; A. Mulato and J. M. Cherrington, 12th World AIDS Conf., abstr. 41195, 1998).
The current study was designed to evaluate the anti-HIV-1 activity,
safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of oral tenofovir DF when
administered as a single daily dose for 28 consecutive days.
(The results of this study were presented at the 5th Conference on
Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Chicago, Ill., 1 to 5 February 1998 [abstract LB-8] and the 12th World AIDS Conference, Geneva, Switzerland, 28 June to 3 July 1998 [abstracts 12211 and 41218].)
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Study population.
Eligible subjects included men and women
with documented HIV-1 infection, HIV-1 RNA levels in plasma of
10,000
copies/ml, CD4 cell counts of
200 cells/mm3, and
Karnofsky performance status scores of
80. At the time of screening,
subjects were required to have a serum creatinine level of
1.5 mg/dl,
a calculated creatinine clearance rate of
60 ml/min (according to the
Cockcroft-Gault formula), a total bilirubin level of
1.5 mg/dl,
hepatic transaminases less than or equal to three times the
upper limit of normal, serum amylase <1.5 times the upper limit
of normal, an absolute neutrophil count of
1,000
cells/mm3, a platelet count of
75,000/mm3, a
hemoglobin concentration of
8.0 g/dl, and prothrombin and partial
thromboplastin times of <1.2 the times upper limit of normal. A
negative pregnancy test was required at the time of enrollment for
women with childbearing potential. Subjects with a positive serum test
for hepatitis B surface antigen were excluded, as were those with
active, serious infections. Prior antiretroviral therapy was permitted
(other than adefovir dipivoxil); however, concomitant antiretroviral
therapy was prohibited from 2 weeks prior to study entry through day 42 of the study. Subjects were excluded if they were receiving ongoing
therapy with agents considered to have nephrotoxic potential or to
compete for renal elimination via active renal secretion (probenecid).
Study design.
This was a randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled, dose escalation study of four doses of tenofovir DF
(75, 150, 300, and 600 mg). Subjects received a single dose of the
study drug in the fasted state and then, after a 7-day washout period,
28 consecutive daily doses of the study drug, each following a meal. Within each cohort, approximately eight subjects were randomly assigned
to receive tenofovir DF and two were assigned to receive a placebo.
Randomization was performed centrally by a computer-generated random-number program that assigned subject numbers in blocks of five
within each dose cohort to active-drug or placebo treatment. Prior to
dose escalation to 150 mg of tenofovir DF, five additional subjects
(four active and one placebo) were enrolled in the first dosing cohort
(75 mg) in order to confirm safety. Subjects were recruited from three
centers: The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, San Francisco
General Hospital, and the University of Washington School of Medicine.
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Human experimentation
guidelines of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and of
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, the University of
California, San Francisco, and the University of Washington were followed.
The use of a placebo control provided the most rigorous evaluation of
the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiviral profile
of a new compound.
In addition, for a short-term trial, giving
a placebo to HIV-1-positive
patients who had never received antiretroviral
therapy or who were not
responding to or were intolerant of their
current regimen was
considered acceptable by the participating
investigators and
institutional review boards. Furthermore, tenofovir
data
obtained with the SIV model indicated that resistance to
tenofovir is
slow to develop (
13). Although tenofovir DF monotherapy
was considered appropriate for this clinical trial design, we
are not
advocating that monotherapy with any antiretroviral be
used in clinical
practice.
Study drug.
Each subject received tenofovir DF or
identical-appearing, lactose-containing placebo tablets (all of the
study medication was supplied by Gilead Sciences, Inc.). Each tenofovir
DF tablet contained 75 mg of the active drug. Fasting subjects received a single dose of the study drug at approximately 9 am on day 1 of the
study and continued to fast for 2 h after dosing. After a 7-day
washout period, the study drug was administered once daily after food
for 28 consecutive days (days 8 to 35).
Pharmacokinetic analyses.
Prior to each pharmacokinetic
sampling period, subjects were admitted to an inpatient research center
at each site. Blood samples were drawn at 0 h (predose) and at
0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after dosing
for determination of serum pharmacokinetic parameters on days 1, 8, and
15 of the study. On study day 1, the drug was administered after an
overnight fast; on study days 8 and 15, the drug was given following
the consumption of a standardized, high-fat breakfast. Subjects in the
300- and 600-mg cohorts also underwent pharmacokinetic sampling after
eating a standardized breakfast on the last day of dosing (day 35);
additional samples were obtained at 36 and 48 h. Urine was
collected over the intervals 0 to 4, 4 to 8, 8 to 12, and 12 to 24 h after dosing on days of pharmacokinetic sampling, except on day 1, when it was collected for 72 h.
Serum and urine samples were analyzed for tenofovir concentrations by
using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic
assay
involving precolumn derivatization and fluorescence detection
(
3). Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed by
application
of a nonlinear curve-fitting software package (WinNonlin
Standard
Edition, version 2.1; Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View,
Calif.)
using noncompartmental methods. Pharmacokinetic parameters
dependent
on the drug's terminal half-life were calculated only for
patients
with drug concentrations in serum greater than the
lower limit
of quantitation through 12 h following drug
administration. Additionally,
pharmacokinetic parameters were
calculated only if accurate assessment
of the area under the
concentration-versus-time profile (AUC)
and its derived pharmacokinetic
parameters was possible. Summary
statistics are reported only when
greater than 50% of the subjects
dosed on a visit contributed data for
the given pharmacokinetic
metric. The oral bioavailability of tenofovir
from tenofovir DF
was determined by using historical data from
administration of
intravenous tenofovir (
3).
Safety evaluations.
Clinical assessments were performed, and
blood for safety monitoring was obtained regularly during the study.
Safety laboratory testing included serum chemistry and electrolyte
panels, hematology, coagulation parameters, and urinalyses. Subjects
were monitored for 4 weeks (through day 63) after receiving the last
dose of the study drug.
Signs, symptoms, and laboratory abnormalities were recorded by using a
modified graded toxicity scale based on the AIDS Clinical
Trials Group
common toxicity grading scale (
1). In general,
toxicities
or abnormalities were classified as follows: mild,
grade I; moderate,
grade II; severe, grade III; possibly life
threatening, grade IV. The
treating investigator, without knowledge
of treatment assignment,
assessed the relationship of an adverse
event to the study medication.
Treatment assignment remained blinded
until receipt of all adverse
event reports from the sites and
until verification of all data was
completed.
Antiviral activity.
Blood samples for HIV-1 RNA levels and
T-cell subset analyses (CD4, CD8) were obtained on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 14, 18, 21, 28, and 35. For HIV-1 RNA analysis, plasma was shipped to a
central laboratory (Johns Hopkins Research and Reference Laboratory,
Baltimore, Md.) and analyzed by using a quantitative RT-PCR assay
(Amplicor; Roche Diagnostics Inc.; lower limit of quantification, 400 copies/ml).
Genotypic resistance analyses.
The preparation of the HIV-1
RNA from patient plasma, the generation of the 1.1-kb PCR fragments
carrying HIV-1 RT, and analyses of the DNA sequences of these PCR
fragments have been previously described (4). Briefly,
viral population-based genotypic analyses were performed with RT-PCR
fragments carrying HIV-1 RT genes generated from patients' plasma
samples taken at baseline and day 35. Nucleotides 1 to 900 (amino acids
1 to 300) of the HIV-1 RT genes generated from the specified plasma
samples were manually sequenced by conventional dideoxy sequencing
methods (4). From plasmid mixing experiments, mixtures of
mutant and wild-type sequences could be detected when present at a
frequency of greater than 20%.
Statistical analyses.
Homogeneity of variance among
treatment groups at baseline was evaluated by analysis of variance for
continuous variables and Pearson's chi-square test for categorical
variables. Evaluations of the differences among the four tenofovir DF
treatment groups and the pooled placebo group in safety parameters and
antiviral activity were done by using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. For
HIV-1 RNA, the baseline value is the geometric mean of the prestudy drug values on days 0 and 1. For CD4 cell counts, the baseline value is
the value from day 1. Median values are followed by the interquartile
range in parentheses. The safety analysis included each of the 49 subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication. All of
the data collected up to 30 days after permanent study medication
discontinuation are included.
Rank analysis of variance with Fisher's least-significant-difference
tests was performed on pharmacokinetic exposure metrics
to assess dose
linearity. Signed rank tests were performed to
compare pharmacokinetics
in the fasted (day 1) state versus the
fed (day 8) state for each dose
group for assessment of the food
effect. Signed rank tests were
performed to compare single-dose
to steady-state pharmacokinetic values
in the fed state (day 8
versus days 15 and 35) to assess changes in
tenofovir pharmacokinetics
over time.
P values of less than
or equal to 0.05 were deemed
statistically significant. There was no
adjustment for multiple
comparisons.
 |
RESULTS |
Study subjects.
A total of 49 HIV-1-infected subjects (8 females, 41 males) were enrolled in the four cohorts between 6 May 1997 and 18 May 1999 (15 in the 75-mg cohort, 10 in the 150-mg cohort, 11 in
the 300-mg cohort, and 13 in the 600-mg cohort). Thirty-eight subjects were assigned to receive the active drug (12 at 75 mg, 8 at 150 mg, 8 at 300 mg, and 10 at 600 mg). All of the 11 other study subjects
received a placebo.
The five study groups (pooled placebo and 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg of
tenofovir DF) were similar in age and race (Table
1).
Although the proportion of subjects
who had received prior antiretroviral
therapy varied in the four
groups, the differences were not significant
(Table
1). Most of the
antiretroviral agents used prior to study
were nucleoside analogues.
There were no significant differences
in median baseline
log
10 HIV-1 RNA levels or median baseline CD4
counts among
the four groups (Table
1).
Pharmacokinetics.
Median steady-state
concentration-versus-time curves on day 15 are shown in Fig.
1. Median tenofovir pharmacokinetic
parameters obtained on study days 1, 8, 15, and 35 are shown in Table
2. Median peak tenofovir concentrations
(Cmax) were proportional to dose. The times
required to reach maximum drug concentrations (Tmax) were similar for all doses in the fasted
state (0.5 to 1.0 h) and were increased by 0.5 to 2.2 h when
the drug was administered with food. In the 75- and 150-mg dose
cohorts, many tenofovir concentrations during the pharmacokinetic
sampling period were below the limit of quantitation of the
bioanalytical assay, resulting in limited calculation of
pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax,
Tmax) for these cohorts on some visits.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Steady-state concentrations of tenofovir in serum after
7 days of daily oral dosing of HIV-1-infected subjects with tenofovir
DF. Data are the median and range for the evaluable (eight or nine)
subjects at each dose level.
|
|
Median steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters evaluated on day 15 (and
day 35 where applicable) were dose linear across all
dose groups. There
were no changes in pharmacokinetic parameters
over time as assessed by
comparison of total drug exposure following
the first dose versus at
steady state. The total tenofovir exposure
over the dosing interval at
steady state for the 300- and 600-mg
doses was similar to the total
tenofovir exposure following the
first dose, indicating no unexpected
drug accumulation. For the
300- and 600-mg dose cohorts, following the
achievement of
Cmax,
tenofovir concentrations in
serum declined in a biphasic manner
with terminal half-lives between 12 and 15 h, regardless of the
feeding state or pharmacokinetic
sampling period. The apparent
serum and renal clearances of tenofovir
exceeded the calculated
creatinine clearance, indicating active tubular
secretion of tenofovir
by the
kidneys.
Oral bioavailability of tenofovir was estimated by using historical
data obtained in an evaluation of a 1-mg/kg intravenous
dose
(
3). Oral bioavailability was enhanced by administration
with a high-fat meal. The oral bioavailability of the 300- and
600-mg
doses of tenofovir DF were estimated to be 25 and 21%,
respectively,
in the fasted state and 39 and 34%, respectively,
in the fed state.
The median steady-state levels of tenofovir
in serum after
administration of eight consecutive doses of 150,
300, and 600 mg of
tenofovir DF were 35, 63, and 131%, respectively,
of that measured
following the administration of a 1-mg/kg intravenous
tenofovir dose.
Calculated creatinine clearance was not affected
by repeated
administration of tenofovir DF at any dose
level.
Antiviral activity.
The plasma HIV-1 RNA responses in the
subjects in the four tenofovir DF arms and the combined placebo arm are
shown in Fig. 2. After administration of
a single oral dose of tenofovir DF, median decreases in HIV-1 RNA
levels in plasma at day 4 were seen in the 150-mg dose group (
0.20
log10 copies/ml) and in the 300-mg dose group (
0.33
log10 copies/ml). Compared to the placebo group, statistically significant median changes were seen for all tenofovir dose groups at day 35:
0.33 log10 copies/ml (P = 0.003) for the 75-mg dose group,
0.44 log10
copies/ml (P = 0.0002) for the 150-mg dose group,
1.22 log10 copies/ml (P = 0.0004) for the
300-mg dose group, and
0.80 log10 copies/ml (P = 0.0002) for the 600-mg dose group. The median decrease in
log10 HIV-1 RNA after 28 days of dosing was greater for
subjects in the 300-mg dose group than for those the 150-mg dose group
(P = 0.03) and those in the 75-mg dose group
(P = 0.0005) but not statistically significantly
different for those in the 600-mg dose group.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Median changes in HIV-1 RNA in plasma from the baseline
among placebo-treated subjects and the three tenofovir DF (TDF)-treated
dose groups of patients (as-treated analysis).
|
|
The 300-mg dose group contained eight patients, of whom four had had no
previous treatment. The median decrease in log
10 HIV-1
RNA
after 28 days of dosing in the untreated patients was

1.57
log
10 copies/ml, while the median decrease in the
previously treated
patients was

0.97 log
10 copies/ml.
Although all of the groups experienced increases in CD4 counts that
ranged from 17 to 64 cells/mm
3 in the 300- and 600-mg dose
group, respectively, none of these
changes were
significant.
Genotypic analyses.
Baseline and day 35 RT sequences (amino
acids 1 to 300) of HIV-1 from the plasma of all tenofovir-treated
subjects in the 75-, 150-, 300-, and 600-mg dosing cohorts were
analyzed. No subject developed detectable RT sequence changes during
the 4-week dosing period. A total of nine subjects had HIV-1 expressing
nucleoside-associated RT mutations at baseline (Table
3). The 3TC-associated M184V mutation was
identified in the baseline plasma HIV-1 from eight subjects (75 mg, one
subject; 150 mg, five subjects; 600 mg, two subjects) treated with
tenofovir. By day 35, this mutation was no longer detectable in four of
the eight subjects, consistent with previous reports of impaired
fitness of M184V-expressing HIV-1. Three subjects expressed
3TC-thymidine analog-associated resistance mutations at baseline,
either as mixtures or as full mutants (75 mg, one subject; 600 mg, two
subjects; Table 3). These mutations were maintained through day 35 in
most subjects; one subject (subject I) demonstrated the loss of an
unusual T69A mutation but maintained the M41L and T215Y mutations as
mixtures of the mutant and the wild type. Sequence data from patients
with detectable mutations have been deposited with GenBank (accession numbers AF375228 to AF375241).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
Genotypic analysis of RT of tenofovir DF-treated subjects
with baseline nucleoside-associated RT mutations
|
|
Safety and tolerance.
Forty-nine subjects entered the study;
41 subjects completed the study. Four subjects discontinued the study
drug due to laboratory abnormalities according to protocol: 1 in the
placebo group, 1 in the 75-mg group, and 2 in the 300-mg group. One
additional subject in the placebo group was removed from the study
after administration of a single dose due to high amylase and lipase levels at baseline. Other reasons for removal were patient request and
noncompliance (two patients in the placebo group and two in the 600-mg
dose group).
Adverse events and laboratory abnormalities of severe or
life-threatening severity (grade III or IV) judged to be possibly
or
probably related to the study drug are shown in Table
4. A
total of six subjects had grade III
or greater elevations in serum
creatine kinase (CK) levels (i.e., CK
levels greater than four
times the upper limit of normal) during the
study; five of these
subjects received tenofovir, and one subject was
in the placebo
group (Table
4). In one subject, CK elevation resolved
despite
continuation of the active study drug (75-mg group). In four of
the other five tenofovir-treated subjects with CK elevation, the
CK
rise was associated with recent exercise. In two of these four
subjects, elevations of serum CK recurred upon repetition of similar
exercise 2 to 3 weeks after discontinuation of the study drug.
In the
remaining subject, CK elevation was associated with cocaine
use and
alcohol intoxication. Only mild symptoms of fatigue were
reported at
the time of the CK elevations. There were no sequelae,
and no dose
relationship was apparent.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 4.
Grade III or IV adverse events (severe or life
threatening) possibly or probably related to the study drug
|
|
Three of the five subjects with grade III or IV elevations in CK had
concurrent elevations in aspartate aminotransferase (AST)
or alanine
aminotransferase (ALT) (to greater than five times
the upper limit of
normal). Two of these episodes were judged
possibly or probably related
to the study drug. In each, the timing
of the rise and fall of AST and
ALT was similar to that of serum
CK levels, suggestive of a skeletal
muscle rather than a hepatic
etiology.
Two subjects experienced severe peripheral neuropathy that occurred
when they were off the study drug. One subject in the
placebo group had
a prior history of peripheral neuropathy and
was one of the subjects
who experienced a grade IV CK elevation.
The other subject, who
also had a history of peripheral neuropathy,
was in the 300-mg
tenofovir DF dose group. Because the recurrence
was consistent with
the subject's "flares" in the past, his physician
considered the
event to be possibly related to the study
drug.
One subject in the 300-mg group had an isolated rise in serum
creatinine (1.7 mg/dl) on day 35. Screening and baseline creatinine
values were 0.9 and 1.2 mg/dl, respectively. On the following
day, the
level was 0.9 mg/dl. All subsequent serum creatinine
values were normal
in this subject, and there was no proteinuria.
No subject in the study
had grade III or greater (i.e., >3+)
proteinuria.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Oral tenofovir DF monotherapy resulted in a dose-related effect on
the HIV-1 load up to 300 mg, produced predictable and dose-proportional serum tenofovir pharmacokinetics, and was well tolerated when administered once daily over 28 consecutive days to HIV-1-infected subjects who had never before been treated with an antiretroviral drug
and to previously treated HIV-1-infected subjects. Although the
values were small, responses appeared to be more pronounced in
patients never before exposed to antiretroviral therapy.
Previously, clinical evaluation of intravenous tenofovir monotherapy of
HIV-1-infected subjects demonstrated a dose-dependent and statistically
significant antiviral effect (3), corroborating data
derived from studies of monotherapy with tenofovir in SIV-infected macaques (12, 13). In the current study, administration of a single dose of oral tenofovir DF was associated with a statistically significant decrease in HIV-1 RNA levels in plasma compared to that
achieved with a placebo. Following 28 days of dosing, administration of
tenofovir DF once daily at all of the doses studied resulted in
statistically significant decreases in HIV-1 RNA levels in plasma, with
the greatest effect achieved with the 300-mg dose. There was no
increased effect on changes in HIV-1 RNA levels in plasma from the
baseline to day 35 between the 300- and 600-mg dose cohorts
(P = 0.28), despite dose-proportional increases in drug
exposure (P = 0.02). This may be an indication that the
300-mg dose produces the maximum antiviral effect. Consistent with
these data, the maximum antiviral effect seen after administration of seven multiple intravenous doses of tenofovir at 3 mg/kg (AUC from time
zero to infinity [AUC0-
], 16.6 ± 6.05 µg · h/ml) was a median log10 change in HIV-1 RNA levels in
plasma from a baseline of
1.1 copies/ml (3).
A maximum tolerated dose was not established in this study. The most
frequently reported grade III or more severe adverse event, elevation
of CK levels in serum, produced minimal symptoms, was usually
associated temporally with exercise, was unrelated to dose, and
resolved promptly.
Resistance to tenofovir has been difficult to generate in vitro, but a
K65R RT mutation emerges in a fraction of HIV-1 clones after in vitro
passage in the presence of tenofovir. A recombinant virus carrying the
selected K65R mutation is associated with only a modest three- to
fourfold decrease in susceptibility (14). As described in
this report, no genotypic changes in the first 300 amino acids of the
RT gene were detected following 4 weeks of daily dosing in any of the
cohorts. Among the four cohorts, only 9 (24%) of 38 subjects treated
with tenofovir DF had detectable nucleoside-associated RT mutations at
baseline and, with the exception of the 3TC-associated M184V
mutation, these mutations were generally stable through day 35. The
small numbers of patients distributed across multiple dosing regimens
in this study do not allow conclusions about whether baseline
resistance mutations affect the response to tenofovir DF therapy.
Additional larger clinical studies of patient populations with baseline
resistance are required to address this issue.
In summary, oral tenofovir DF exhibits a pharmacokinetic profile that
supports once-daily dosing. Given these encouraging results regarding
the antiviral potency and tolerability of the agent, future clinical
trials of tenofovir DF will seek to identify a safe and effective dose
that can be administered over longer periods of time as a component of
combination antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of HIV-1 infection.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We acknowledge the scientific contributions of Julie Cherrington,
Stanley C. Gill, Kenneth Cundy, and John Su. We are grateful to Ella
Redpath (The Johns Hopkins University), Charles Cooper (Seattle,
Wash.), Anna J. Smith, Curtis Head, and Vittorio Marchesin (San
Francisco, Calif.) for assistance with this study.
Financial support for this study was provided by Gilead Sciences, Inc.,
and National Institutes of Health Division of Research Resources
General Clinical Research Centers grants M01-RR-00052, M01-RR-00083,
and M01-RR-00037 to The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
Baltimore, Md. San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, Calif.,
and the University of Washington, Seattle, respectively. James Kahn
acknowledges support from the NIH (PM30MH5907).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Harvey 502, The
Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St. Baltimore, MD 21287. Phone: (410) 614-1147. Fax: (410) 955-9708. E-mail:
pbarditc{at}jhmi.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Anonymous.
1996.
Division of AIDS table for grading severity of adverse experiences.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Rockville, Md.
|
| 2.
|
Arimilli, M.,
C. Kim,
N. Bischofberger,
J. Dougherty,
A. Mulato,
R. Oliyai,
J. P. Shaw,
K. C. Cundy, and N. Bischofberger.
1997.
Synthesis, in vitro biological evaluation and oral bioavailability of prodrugs of the antiretroviral agent 9-[2-(phosphonomethoxy)-propyl]adenine (PMA).
Antiviral Chem. Chemother.
8:557-564.
|
| 3.
|
Deeks, S. G.,
P. Barditch-Crovo,
P. S. Lietman,
F. Hwang,
K. C. Cundy,
J. F. Rooney,
N. S. Hellmann,
S. Safrin, and J. O. Kahn.
1998.
The safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiretroviral activity of intravenous 9-[2-(R)-(phosphonomethoxy)propyl]adenine, a novel anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) therapy, in HIV-infected adults.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:2380-2384[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Deeks, S. G.,
A. Collier,
J. Lalezari,
A. Pavia,
D. Rodrigue,
W. L. Drew,
J. Toole,
H. Jaffe,
A. S. Mulato,
P. D. Lamy,
W. Li,
J. M. Cherrington,
N. Hillmann, and J. Kahn.
1997.
The safety and efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil, a novel anti-HIV therapy, in HIV infected adults.
J Infect. Dis.
176:1517-1523[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Miller, M. D.,
K. E. Anton,
A. S. Mulato,
P. D. Lamy, and J. M. Cherrington.
1999.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 expressing the lamivudine-associated M184V mutation in reverse transcriptase shows increased susceptibility to adefovir and decreased replication capacity in vitro.
J. Infect. Dis.
179:92-100[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Mulato, A. S., and J. M. Cherrington.
1997.
Anti-HIV activity of adefovir (PMEA) and PMPA in combination with antiretroviral compounds: in vitro analyses.
Antiviral Res.
36:91-97[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Robbins, B. L.,
R. V. Srinivas,
C. Kim,
N. Bischofberger, and A. Fridland.
1998.
Anti-human immunodeficiency virus activity and cellular metabolism of a potential prodrug of the acyclic nucleoside phosphonate 9-R-(2-phosphonomethoxypropyl)adenine (PMPA), bis(isopropyloxymethylcarbonyl)PMPA.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:612-617[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Shaw, J.-P.,
C. M. Sueoka,
R. Oliyai,
W. A. Lee,
M. Arimilli,
C. Kim, and K. C. Cundy.
1997.
Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of novel oral prodrugs of 9-[(R)-2-(phosphonomethoxy)-propyl]adenine (PMPA) in dogs.
Pharm. Res.
14:1824-1829[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Srinivas, R. V., and A. Fridland.
1998.
Antiviral activities of 9-R-2-phosphonomethoxypropyl adenine (PMPA) and bis(isopropyloxymethylcarbonyl)PMPA against various drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus strains.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:1484-1487[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Tsai, C.-C.,
P. Emau,
K. E. Follis,
T. W. Beck,
R. E. Benveniste,
N. Bishofberger,
J. D. Lifson, and W. R. Morton.
1998.
Effectiveness of postinoculation (R)-9-(2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl) adenine treatment for prevention of persistent simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmne infection depends critically on timing of initiation and duration of treatment.
J. Virol.
72:4265-4273[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Tsai, C.-C.,
K. Follis,
K. A. Sabo,
T. W. Beck,
R. F. Grant,
N. Bischofberger,
R. E. Benveniste, and R. Black.
1995.
Prevention of SIV infection in macaques by (R)-9-(2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl) adenine.
Science
270:1197-1199[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Tsai, C.-C.,
K. Follis,
T. W. Beck,
A. Sabo,
N. Bischofberger, and P. I. Dailey.
1997.
Effects of (R)-9-(2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl)adenine monotherapy on chronic SIV infection in macaques.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir.
13:707-712[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Van Rompay, K. K. A.,
J. M. Cherrington,
M. L. Marthas,
C. J. Berardi,
A. S. Mulato,
A. Spinner,
R. P. Tarara,
D. R. Canfield,
S. Telm,
N. Bishofberger, and N. C. Pedersen.
1996.
9-[2-(phosphonomethoxy)propyl]adenine therapy of established simian immunodeficiency virus infection in infant rhesus macaques.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
40:2586-2591[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Wainberg, M. A.,
M. D. Miller,
Y. Quan,
H. Salomon,
A. S. Mulato,
P. D. Lamy,
N. A. Margot,
K. E. Anton, and J. M. Cherrington.
1999.
In vitro selection and characterization of HIV-1 with reduced susceptibility to PMPA.
Antiviral Ther.
4:87-94[Medline].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2001, p. 2733-2739, Vol. 45, No. 10
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.10.2733-2739.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Girard, P.-M., Cabie, A., Michelet, C., Verdon, R., Katlama, C., Mercie, P., Morand-Joubert, L., Petour, P., Monchecourt, F., Chene, G., Trylesinski, A., on behalf of the COOL Study Team,
(2009). A randomized trial of two-drug versus three-drug tenofovir-containing maintenance regimens in virologically controlled HIV-1 patients. J Antimicrob Chemother
64: 126-134
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Herrera, C., Cranage, M., McGowan, I., Anton, P., Shattock, R. J.
(2009). Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors as Potential Colorectal Microbicides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 1797-1807
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cihlar, T., LaFlamme, G., Fisher, R., Carey, A. C., Vela, J. E., Mackman, R., Ray, A. S.
(2009). Novel Nucleotide Human Immunodeficiency Virus Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor GS-9148 with a Low Nephrotoxic Potential: Characterization of Renal Transport and Accumulation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 150-156
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gagnieu, M.-C., Barkil, M. E., Livrozet, J.-M., Cotte, L., Miailhes, P., Boibieux, A., Guitton, J., Tod, M.
(2008). Population Pharmacokinetics of Tenofovir in AIDS Patients. J Clin Pharmacol
48: 1282-1288
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Van Rompay, K. K. A., Durand-Gasselin, L., Brignolo, L. L., Ray, A. S., Abel, K., Cihlar, T., Spinner, A., Jerome, C., Moore, J., Kearney, B. P., Marthas, M. L., Reiser, H., Bischofberger, N.
(2008). Chronic Administration of Tenofovir to Rhesus Macaques from Infancy through Adulthood and Pregnancy: Summary of Pharmacokinetics and Biological and Virological Effects. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 3144-3160
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kiser, J. J., Fletcher, C. V., Flynn, P. M., Cunningham, C. K., Wilson, C. M., Kapogiannis, B. G., Major-Wilson, H., Viani, R. M., Liu, N. X., Muenz, L. R., Harris, D. R., Havens, P. L., and the Adolescent Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Int,
(2008). Pharmacokinetics of Antiretroviral Regimens Containing Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Atazanavir-Ritonavir in Adolescents and Young Adults with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 631-637
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tong, L., Phan, T. K., Robinson, K. L., Babusis, D., Strab, R., Bhoopathy, S., Hidalgo, I. J., Rhodes, G. R., Ray, A. S.
(2007). Effects of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Protease Inhibitors on the Intestinal Absorption of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate In Vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
51: 3498-3504
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Birkus, G., Wang, R., Liu, X., Kutty, N., MacArthur, H., Cihlar, T., Gibbs, C., Swaminathan, S., Lee, W., McDermott, M.
(2007). Cathepsin A Is the Major Hydrolase Catalyzing the Intracellular Hydrolysis of the Antiretroviral Nucleotide Phosphonoamidate Prodrugs GS-7340 and GS-9131. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
51: 543-550
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Margot, N. A., Waters, J. M., Miller, M. D.
(2006). In Vitro Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Resistance Selections with Combinations of Tenofovir and Emtricitabine or Abacavir and Lamivudine. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 4087-4095
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vidal, F., Domingo, J. C., Guallar, J., Saumoy, M., Cordobilla, B., Sanchez de la Rosa, R., Giralt, M., Alvarez, M. L., Lopez-Dupla, M., Torres, F., Villarroya, F., Cihlar, T., Domingo, P.
(2006). In Vitro Cytotoxicity and Mitochondrial Toxicity of Tenofovir Alone and in Combination with Other Antiretrovirals in Human Renal Proximal Tubule Cells. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 3824-3832
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ray, A. S., Cihlar, T., Robinson, K. L., Tong, L., Vela, J. E., Fuller, M. D., Wieman, L. M., Eisenberg, E. J., Rhodes, G. R.
(2006). Mechanism of active renal tubular efflux of tenofovir.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 3297-3304
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ramanathan, S., Cheng, A., Mittan, A., Ebrahimi, R., Kearney, B. P.
(2006). Absence of clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between ribavirin and tenofovir in healthy subjects.. J Clin Pharmacol
46: 559-566
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kearney, B. P., Sayre, J. R., Flaherty, J. F., Chen, S.-S., Kaul, S., Cheng, A. K.
(2005). Drug-Drug and Drug-Food Interactions Between Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Didanosine. J Clin Pharmacol
45: 1360-1367
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hazra, R., Gafni, R. I., Maldarelli, F., Balis, F. M., Tullio, A. N., DeCarlo, E., Worrell, C. J., Steinberg, S. M., Flaherty, J., Yale, K., Kearney, B. P., Zeichner, S. L.
(2005). Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and an Optimized Background Regimen of Antiretroviral Agents as Salvage Therapy for Pediatric HIV Infection. Pediatrics
116: e846-e854
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jullien, V., Treluyer, J.-M., Rey, E., Jaffray, P., Krivine, A., Moachon, L., Lillo-Le Louet, A., Lescoat, A., Dupin, N., Salmon, D., Pons, G., Urien, S.
(2005). Population Pharmacokinetics of Tenofovir in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients Taking Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 3361-3366
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kearney, B. P., Ramanathan, S., Cheng, A. K., Ebrahimi, R., Shah, J.
(2005). Systemic and Renal Pharmacokinetics of Adefovir and Tenofovir Upon Coadministration. J Clin Pharmacol
45: 935-940
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Menne, S., Cote, P. J., Korba, B. E., Butler, S. D., George, A. L., Tochkov, I. A., Delaney, W. E. IV, Xiong, S., Gerin, J. L., Tennant, B. C.
(2005). Antiviral Effect of Oral Administration of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Woodchucks with Chronic Woodchuck Hepatitis Virus Infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 2720-2728
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Droste, J. A. H., Verweij-van Wissen, C. P. W. G. M., Kearney, B. P., Buffels, R., vanHorssen, P. J., Hekster, Y. A., Burger, D. M.
(2005). Pharmacokinetic Study of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Combined with Rifampin in Healthy Volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 680-684
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kirian, M. A, Higginson, R. T, Fulco, P. P.
(2004). Acute Onset of Pancreatitis with Concomitant Use of Tenofovir and Didanosine. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
38: 1660-1663
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Van Rompay, K. K. A., Brignolo, L. L., Meyer, D. J., Jerome, C., Tarara, R., Spinner, A., Hamilton, M., Hirst, L. L., Bennett, D. R., Canfield, D. R., Dearman, T. G., Von Morgenland, W., Allen, P. C., Valverde, C., Castillo, A. B., Martin, R. B., Samii, V. F., Bendele, R., Desjardins, J., Marthas, M. L., Pedersen, N. C., Bischofberger, N.
(2004). Biological Effects of Short-Term or Prolonged Administration of 9-[2-(Phosphonomethoxy)Propyl]Adenine (Tenofovir) to Newborn and Infant Rhesus Macaques. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 1469-1487
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hazra, R., Balis, F. M., Tullio, A. N., DeCarlo, E., Worrell, C. J., Steinberg, S. M., Flaherty, J. F., Yale, K., Poblenz, M., Kearney, B. P., Zhong, L., Coakley, D. F., Blanche, S., Bresson, J. L., Zuckerman, J. A., Zeichner, S. L.
(2004). Single-Dose and Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Children. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 124-129
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Izzedine, H., Launay-Vacher, V., Jullien, V., Aymard, G., Duvivier, C., Deray, G.
(2003). Pharmacokinetics of tenofovir in haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant
18: 1931-1933
[Full Text]
-
Fulco, P. P., Kirian, M. A
(2003). Effect of Tenofovir on Didanosine Absorption in Patients with HIV. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
37: 1325-1328
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Keith, K. A., Hitchcock, M. J. M., Lee, W. A., Holy, A., Kern, E. R.
(2003). Evaluation of Nucleoside Phosphonates and Their Analogs and Prodrugs for Inhibition of Orthopoxvirus Replication. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 2193-2198
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Grim, S. A, Romanelli, F.
(2003). Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
37: 849-859
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Birkus, G., Hajek, M., Kramata, P., Votruba, I., Holy, A., Otova, B.
(2002). Tenofovir Diphosphate Is a Poor Substrate and a Weak Inhibitor of Rat DNA Polymerases {alpha}, {delta}, and {varepsilon}. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
46: 1610-1613
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Harrigan, P. R., Miller, M. D., McKenna, P., Brumme, Z. L., Larder, B. A.
(2002). Phenotypic Susceptibilities to Tenofovir in a Large Panel of Clinically Derived Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
46: 1067-1072
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Birkus, G., Hitchcock, M. J. M., Cihlar, T.
(2002). Assessment of Mitochondrial Toxicity in Human Cells Treated with Tenofovir: Comparison with Other Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
46: 716-723
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
(2001). Tenofovir. JWatch Infect. Diseases
2001: 16-16
[Full Text]