This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pfaller, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pfaller, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. N.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2001, p. 2862-2864, Vol. 45, No. 10
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.10.2862-2864.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

In Vitro Activities of Posaconazole (Sch 56592) Compared with Those of Itraconazole and Fluconazole against 3,685 Clinical Isolates of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans

M. A. Pfaller,1,* S. A. Messer,1 R. J. Hollis,1 and R. N. Jones2,dagger

Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City,1 and The Jones Group/JMI Laboratories, North Liberty,2 Iowa

Received 11 June 2001/Returned for modification 27 June 2001/Accepted 13 July 2001


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References

Posaconazole is a new investigational triazole with broad-spectrum antifungal activity. The in vitro activities of posaconazole were compared with those of itraconazole and fluconazole against 3,685 isolates of Candida spp. (3,312 isolates) and C. neoformans (373 isolates) obtained from over 70 different medical centers worldwide. The MICs of the antifungal drugs were determined by broth microdilution tests performed according to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards method using RPMI 1640 as the test medium. Posaconazole was very active against all Candida spp. (MIC at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited [MIC90], 0.5 µg/ml; 97% of MICs were <= 1 µg/ml) and C. neoformans (MIC90, 0.5 µg/ml; 100% of MICs were <= 1 µg/ml). Candida albicans was the most susceptible species of Candida (MIC90, 0.06 µg/ml), and Candida glabrata was the least susceptible (MIC90, 4 µg/ml). Posaconazole was more active than itraconazole and fluconazole against all Candida spp. and C. neoformans. These results provide further evidence for the spectrum and potency of posaconazole against a large and geographically diverse collection of clinically important fungal pathogens.


    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References

The triazole antifungal agents fluconazole and itraconazole offer several advantages over amphotericin B, including decreased toxicity and the versatility of oral and intravenous administration, and they are frequently used in the treatment of fungal infections due to Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans, and miscellaneous yeast species (14). However, failure of fluconazole and itraconazole therapy has been reported, and acquired or intrinsic resistance to these agents is well known (12, 16). There is clearly a need for additional agents with an enhanced potency and spectrum of activity to improve the treatment of fungal infections.

Posaconazole (Sch 56592) is an investigational triazole antifungal agent that is presently in Phase III clinical trials. Posaconazole exhibits linear pharmacokinetics and has demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy to those of fluconazole in both human and animal studies (3, 7, 8, 10; A. Catanzaro, G. Cloud, D. Stevens, B. Levine, P. Williams, et al., 40th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. 1417, 2000; R. Y. Hachem, I. I. Raad, C. M. Afif, R. Negroni, J. Graybill, et al., 40th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. 1109, 2000; L. Nieto, R. Northland, P. Pittisuttithum, C. Firnhaber, S. Jacobson, et al., 40th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. 1108, 2000; J. A. Vazquez, R. Northland, S. Miller, G. Dickinson, and G. Wright, 40th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. 1107, 2000). In vitro studies have documented a potency and spectrum of activity similar to those of itraconazole and superior to those of fluconazole against clinically important isolates of Candida spp., C. neoformans, and Aspergillus spp. (1, 3-5, 8-11).

Because previous in vitro studies have included a limited number of isolates of various yeast species and have generally been restricted in terms of the geographic distribution of the tested strains, we determined the in vitro activities of posaconazole against an international collection (from more than 70 institutions in 22 nations) of 3,685 clinical isolates of Candida spp. (14 species, 3,312 isolates) and C. neoformans (373 isolates). The comparison agents tested were the licensed triazole antifungal agents fluconazole and itraconazole. The in vitro susceptibility testing method employed was the microdilution broth method described in the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) document M27-A (6).


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References

Organisms. A total of 3,685 clinical isolates of Candida spp. (3,312 isolates) and C. neoformans (373 isolates) obtained from more than 70 different medical centers in North America, South America, and Europe were tested. The collection of isolates included 1,992 C. albicans, 421 C. glabrata, 468 C. parapsilosis, 243 C. tropicalis, 70 C. dubliniensis, 20 C. guilliermondii, 12 C. famata, 47 C. krusei, 24 C. lusitaniae, 6 C. kefyr, 4 C. rugosa, 2 C. lambica, and 2 C. inconspicua isolates and 1 C. lipolytica isolate. The isolates were all recent clinical isolates and the majority were from blood or normally sterile body fluids. Only the C. dubliniensis isolates were from mucosal sites. The isolates were identified by standard methods (15) and were stored as water suspensions until they were used. Prior to testing, each isolate was passaged at least twice on potato dextrose agar (Remel, Lenexa, Kans.) to ensure optimal growth characteristics.

Antifungal agents. Standard antifungal powders of posaconazole (Sch 56592; Schering-Plough), fluconazole (Pfizer), and itraconazole (Janssen) were obtained from their respective manufacturers. Stock solutions were prepared in polyethylene glycol (posaconazole and itraconazole) or water (fluconazole). Serial twofold dilutions were prepared exactly as outlined in NCCLS document M27-A (6). Final dilutions were made in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.165 M morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) buffer (Sigma). The final concentration of solvent did not exceed 1% in any well. Aliquots (0.1 ml) of each antifungal agent at a 2× final concentration were dispensed into the wells of plastic microdilution trays by using a Quick Spense II system (Dynatech Laboratories, Chantilly, Va.). The trays were sealed and frozen at -70°C until they were used.

Antifungal susceptibility studies. Broth microdilution testing was performed in accordance with the guidelines in NCCLS document M27-A (6) by using the spectrophotometric method of inoculum preparation, an inoculum concentration of (1.5 ± 1.0) × 103 cells/ml, and RPMI 1640 medium buffered to pH 7.0 with MOPS. A 100-µl yeast inoculum was added to each well of the microdilution trays. The final concentrations of the antifungal agents were 0.007 to 8.0 µg/ml for posaconazole and itraconazole and 0.12 to 128 µg/ml for fluconazole. The trays were incubated at 35°C, and MIC endpoints were read after 48 h of incubation (for both Candida spp. and C. neoformans). Drug-free and yeast-free controls were included.

Following incubation, the broth microdilution wells were examined with the aid of a reading mirror; the growth in each well was compared with that of the growth control (drug-free) well. The MIC of each triazole was defined as the lowest concentration that produced a prominent decrease in turbidity (approximately 50% reduction in growth) compared with that of the drug-free control (6). The interpretive criteria for fluconazole and itraconazole were those published by Rex et al. (13) and the NCCLS (6).

Quality control. Quality was controlled by testing the following strains recommended by NCCLS standard M27-A (6): C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and C. krusei ATCC 6258 (2).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References

Table 1 summarizes the in vitro susceptibilities of 3,312 isolates of Candida spp. to posaconazole, fluconazole, and itraconazole. Overall, posaconazole was quite active (MIC at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited [MIC90], 0.5 µg/ml; 97% of isolates were inhibited by <= 1 µg/ml). C. albicans and C. dubliniensis were the most susceptible (MIC90, 0.06 µg/ml; 99 to 100% of MICs were <= 1 µg/ml) and C. glabrata was the least susceptible (MIC90, 4 µg/ml; 80% of MICs were <= 1 µg/ml). Posaconazole was more active than both fluconazole and itraconazole against all species of Candida. Notably, 100% of C. krusei isolates were inhibited by <= 0.5 µg of posaconazole/ml, compared with 72% of isolates being inhibited by itraconazole.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   In vitro susceptibilities of 3,312 clinical isolates of Candida spp. to posaconazole, itraconazole, and fluconazole

Among the 3,312 Candida spp. isolates studied, a total of 76 were resistant to both fluconazole and itraconazole. The MICs of posaconazole (0.03 to >= 8 µg/ml; mode, >= 8 µg/ml) were also elevated with these isolates (82% of MICs were >= 4 µg/ml) (data not shown). In contrast, among 32 isolates resistant to fluconazole but not itraconazole, 31 (97%) were inhibited by <= 1 µg/ml of posaconazole. Isolates inhibited by 16 to 32 µg of fluconazole/ml (dose-dependent susceptibility) were all susceptible to <= 1 µg of posaconazole/ml.

The in vitro susceptibilities of 373 isolates of C. neoformans to posaconazole, fluconazole, and itraconazole are shown in Table 2. Fluconazole had MICs of <= 8 µg/ml for 78% of the C. neoformans isolates tested, 16 to 32 µg/ml for 21% of the isolates, and >= 64 µg/ml for 1% of the isolates. Overall, posaconazole and itraconazole demonstrated comparable activities (MIC90, 0.5 µg/ml; 100% of isolates were inhibited by <= 1 µg/ml); however, 78% of isolates were inhibited by <= 0.12 µg of posaconazole/ml versus only 11% with itraconazole.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   In vitro susceptibilities of 373 clinical isolates of C. neoformans to posaconazole, itraconazole, and fluconazole

Among the isolates of C. neoformans inhibited by <= 8 µg of fluconazole/ml, posaconazole was more potent than itraconazole: 96% of these isolates were inhibited by <= 0.25 µg of posaconazole/ml and 68% were inhibited by <= 0.25 µg of itraconazole/ml. Posaconazole was also more active than itraconazole against the 73 isolates inhibited by 16 to 32 µg of fluconazole/ml. All of these isolates were inhibited by <= 0.5 µg of posaconazole/ml and 75% were inhibited by <= 0.5 µg of itraconazole/ml. Only three isolates required >= 64 µg of fluconazole/ml to inhibit growth in vitro. For these isolates, the posaconazole MICs were 0.12, 0.5, and 1 µg/ml and the itraconazole MICs were 0.5, 1, and 1 µg/ml.

These findings confirm and extend those reported previously regarding the antifungal activity of posaconazole (1, 3-5, 8-11). Posaconazole was as active or more potent than either fluconazole or itraconazole against virtually all of the Candida spp. and C. neoformans isolates tested. Posaconazole has been reported to be fungicidal against C. neoformans, filamentous fungi, and some Candida species (4, 8); however, minimum fungicidal concentration determinations were not performed in the present study. Similar to what occurred with fluconazole and itraconazole, some trailing was observed with posaconazole, but this was minimal and did not interfere with MIC endpoint determinations. Although the MICs of posaconazole for Candida spp. isolates that were resistant to fluconazole and itraconazole were also found to be elevated, those isolates resistant to fluconazole alone and those for which fluconazole MICs were 16 to 32 µg/ml were susceptible to <= 1 µg of posaconazole/ml. Likewise, posaconazole was active against all of the C. krusei isolates tested.

Posaconazole was also more active than either itraconazole or fluconazole against clinical isolates of C. neoformans. Both posaconazole and itraconazole were most active against isolates with the greatest susceptibility to fluconazole (MIC, <= 8 µg/ml). In addition, we evaluated the activity of posaconazole against isolates for which fluconazole MICs were increased. As fluconazole MICs increased, the MICs of both posaconazole and itraconazole did likewise. However, a greater proportion of isolates for which fluconazole MICs were 16 to 32 µg/ml remained susceptible at concentrations of <= 0.5 µg/ml for posaconazole (100%) than for itraconazole (75%). The three isolates for which fluconazole MICs were >= 64 µg/ml were all inhibited by <= 1 µg of posaconazole/ml, and the posaconazole MICs for two of the isolates were <= 0.5 µg/ml.

Consistent with these in vitro results, in vivo studies have demonstrated efficacy in treating infections due to Candida spp. and C. neoformans with posaconazole (3, 8; Hachem et al., 40th ICAAC; Nieto et al., 40th ICAAC; Vazquez et al., 40th ICAAC). Pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated excellent oral bioavailability and peak concentrations in plasma of >5 µg/ml, with sustained levels exceeding 1 µg/ml for the entire dosing interval (7, 9). Thus, the oral dosing regimens result in concentrations of posaconazole in plasma that exceeded the MICs for 97 to 100% of Candida spp. and C. neoformans isolates (Tables 1 and 2).

In summary, we have demonstrated posaconazole to be more potent than fluconazole and itraconazole against significant clinical isolates of Candida spp. and C. neoformans. The emerging in vivo data from experimental models of fungal infection, as well as from clinical trials, appear to support these in vitro data. Posaconazole is a very promising new triazole antifungal agent that merits further clinical investigation.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Kay Meyer and Linda Elliott for secretarial assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

This study was partially supported by grants from Schering-Plough Research Institute, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, and Bristol-Myers Squibb (The SENTRY Program).


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Medical Microbiology Division, C606 GH, Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242. Phone: (319) 384-9566. Fax: (319) 356-4916. E-mail: michael-pfaller{at}uiowa.edu.

dagger Present address: 345 Beaver Kreek Centre, North Liberty, IA 52317.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References

1. Barchiesi, F., D. Arzeni, A. W. Fothergill, L. F. DiFrancesco, F. Caselli, M. G. Rinaldi, and G. Scalise. 2000. In vitro activities of the new antifungal triazole SCH 56592 against common and emerging yeast pathogens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:226-229[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Barry, A. L., M. A. Pfaller, S. D. Brown, A. Espinel-Ingroff, M. A. Ghannoum, C. Knapp, R. P. Rennie, J. H. Rex, and M. G. Rinaldi. 2000. Quality control limits for broth microdilution susceptibility tests of ten antifungal agents. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3457-3459[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Cacciapuoti, A., D. Loebenberg, E. Corcoran, F. Menzel, Jr., E. L. Moss, Jr., C. Norris, M. Michalski, K. Raynor, J. Halpern, C. Mendrick, B. Arnold, B. Antonacci, R. Parmegiani, T. Yarosh-Tomaine, G. H. Miller, and R. S. Hare. 2000. In vitro and in vivo activities of SCH 56592 (Posaconazole), a new triazole antifungal agent, against Aspergillus and Candida. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2017-2022[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Espinel-Ingroff, A. 1998. Comparison of in vitro activities of the new triazole SCH 56592 and the echinocandins MK-0991 (L-743,872) and LY303366 against opportunistic filamentous and dimorphic fungi and yeasts. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2950-2956[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Galgiani, J. N., and M. L. Lewis. 1997. In vitro studies of activities of the antifungal triazoles SCH 56592 and itraconazole against Candida albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans, and other pathogenic yeasts. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:180-183[Abstract].
6. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved standard M27-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
7. Nomeir, A. A., P. Kumari, M. J. Hilbert, S. Gupta, D. Loebenberg, A. Cacciapuoti, R. Hare, G. H. Miller, C. C. Lin, and M. N. Cayen. 2000. Pharmacokinetics of SCH 56592, a new azole broad-spectrum antifungal agent, in mice, rats, rabbits, dogs and Cynomolgus monkeys. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:727-731[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. Perfect, J. R., G. M. Cox, R. K. Dodge, and W. A. Schell. 1996. In vitro and in vivo efficacies of the azole SCH56592 against Cryptococcus neoformans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1910-1913[Abstract].
9. Petraitiene, R., V. Petraitis, A. H. Groll, T. Sein, S. Piscitelli, M. Candelario, A. Field-Ridley, N. Avila, J. Bacher, and T. J. Walsh. 2001. Antifungal activity and pharmacokinetics of posaconazole (SCH 56592) in treatment and prevention of experimental invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: correlation with galactomannan antigenemia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:857-869[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. Pfaller, M. A., S. Messer, and R. N. Jones. 1997. Activity of a new triazole, SCH 56592, compared with those of four other antifungal agents tested against clinical isolates of Candida spp. and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:233-235[Abstract].
11. Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, R. J. Hollis, R. N. Jones, G. V. Doern, M. E. Brandt, and R. A. Hajjeh. 1998. In vitro susceptibilities of Candida blood stream isolates to the new triazole antifungal agents BMS-207147, SCH 56592, and voriconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:3242-3244[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Rex, J. H., M. G. Rinaldi, and M. A. Pfaller. 1995. Resistance of Candida species to fluconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:1-8[Medline].
13. Rex, J. H., M. A. Pfaller, J. N. Galgiani, M. S. Bartlett, A. Espinel-Ingroff, M. A. Ghannoum, M. Lancaster, F. C. Odds, M. G. Rinaldi, T. J. Walsh, and A. L. Barry for the Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.. 1997. Development of interpretive breakpoints for antifungal susceptibility testing: conceptual framework and analysis of in vitro-in vivo correlation data for fluconazole, itraconazole and Candida infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24:235-247[Medline].
14. Sheehan, D. J., C. A. Hitchcock, and C. M. Sibley. 1999. Current and emerging azole antifungal agents. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12:40-79[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Warren, N. G., and K. C. Hazen. 1999. Candida, Cryptococcus, and other yeasts of medical importance, p. 1184-1199. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 7th ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
16. White, T. C., K. A. Marr, and R. A. Bowden. 1998. Clinical, cellular, and molecular factors that contribute to antifungal drug resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11:382-402[Abstract/Free Full Text].


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2001, p. 2862-2864, Vol. 45, No. 10
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.10.2862-2864.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Morris, M. I. (2009). Posaconazole: A new oral antifungal agent with an expanded spectrum of activity. Am J Health Syst Pharm 66: 225-236 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rachwalski, E. J, Wieczorkiewicz, J. T, Scheetz, M. H (2008). Posaconazole: An Oral Triazole with an Extended Spectrum of Activity. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 42: 1429-1438 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cuenca-Estrella, M., Gomez-Lopez, A., Gutierrez, M. O., Buitrago, M. J., Rodriguez-Tudela, J. L. (2008). Reliability of the WIDERYST Susceptibility Testing System for Detection of In Vitro Antifungal Resistance in Yeasts. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 1062-1065 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pfaller, M. A., Messer, S. A., Boyken, L., Tendolkar, S., Hollis, R. J., Diekema, D. J. (2008). Selection of a Surrogate Agent (Fluconazole or Voriconazole) for Initial Susceptibility Testing of Posaconazole against Candida spp.: Results from a Global Antifungal Surveillance Program. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 551-559 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lortholary, O., Dannaoui, E., Raoux, D., Hoinard, D., Datry, A., Paugam, A., Poirot, J.-L., Lacroix, C., Dromer, F., the YEASTS Group, (2007). In Vitro Susceptibility to Posaconazole of 1,903 Yeast Isolates Recovered in France from 2003 to 2006 and Tested by the Method of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 3378-3380 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Krishna, G., Sansone-Parsons, A., Martinho, M., Kantesaria, B., Pedicone, L. (2007). Posaconazole Plasma Concentrations in Juvenile Patients with Invasive Fungal Infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 812-818 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sansone-Parsons, A., Krishna, G., Simon, J., Soni, P., Kantesaria, B., Herron, J., Stoltz, R. (2007). Effects of Age, Gender, and Race/Ethnicity on the Pharmacokinetics of Posaconazole in Healthy Volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 495-502 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Espinel-Ingroff, A. (2006). Comparison of Three Commercial Assays and a Modified Disk Diffusion Assay with Two Broth Microdilution Reference Assays for Testing Zygomycetes, Aspergillus spp., Candida spp., and Cryptococcus neoformans with Posaconazole and Amphotericin B. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 3616-3622 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gubbins, P. O., Krishna, G., Sansone-Parsons, A., Penzak, S. R., Dong, L., Martinho, M., Anaissie, E. J. (2006). Pharmacokinetics and safety of oral posaconazole in neutropenic stem cell transplant recipients.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 1993-1999 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sabatelli, F., Patel, R., Mann, P. A., Mendrick, C. A., Norris, C. C., Hare, R., Loebenberg, D., Black, T. A., McNicholas, P. M. (2006). In Vitro Activities of Posaconazole, Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Voriconazole, and Amphotericin B against a Large Collection of Clinically Important Molds and Yeasts.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 2009-2015 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sims, C. R., Paetznick, V. L., Rodriguez, J. R., Chen, E., Ostrosky-Zeichner, L. (2006). Correlation between Microdilution, E-test, and Disk Diffusion Methods for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Posaconazole against Candida spp.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 2105-2108 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cuenca-Estrella, M., Gomez-Lopez, A., Mellado, E., Buitrago, M. J., Monzon, A., Rodriguez-Tudela, J. L. (2006). Head-to-Head Comparison of the Activities of Currently Available Antifungal Agents against 3,378 Spanish Clinical Isolates of Yeasts and Filamentous Fungi. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 917-921 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ullmann, A. J., Cornely, O. A., Burchardt, A., Hachem, R., Kontoyiannis, D. P., Topelt, K., Courtney, R., Wexler, D., Krishna, G., Martinho, M., Corcoran, G., Raad, I. (2006). Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of posaconazole in patients with persistent febrile neutropenia or refractory invasive fungal infection.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 658-666 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pfaller, M. A., Boyken, L., Messer, S. A., Tendolkar, S., Hollis, R. J., Diekema, D. J. (2005). Comparison of Results of Voriconazole Disk Diffusion Testing for Candida Species with Results from a Central Reference Laboratory in the ARTEMIS Global Antifungal Surveillance Program. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 5208-5213 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pitisuttithum, P., Negroni, R., Graybill, J. R., Bustamante, B., Pappas, P., Chapman, S., Hare, R. S., Hardalo, C. J. (2005). Activity of posaconazole in the treatment of central nervous system fungal infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 56: 745-755 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Carrillo-Munoz, A.-J., Quindos, G., Ruesga, M., Alonso, R., del Valle, O., Hernandez-Molina, J. M., McNicholas, P., Loebenberg, D., Santos, P. (2005). Antifungal activity of posaconazole compared with fluconazole and amphotericin B against yeasts from oropharyngeal candidiasis and other infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 55: 317-319 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Courtney, R., Sansone, A., Smith, W., Marbury, T., Statkevich, P., Martinho, M., Laughlin, M., Swan, S. (2005). Posaconazole Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability in Subjects With Varying Degrees of Chronic Renal Disease. J Clin Pharmacol 45: 185-192 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Simitsopoulou, M., Gil-Lamaignere, C., Avramidis, N., Maloukou, A., Lekkas, S., Havlova, E., Kourounaki, L., Loebenberg, D., Roilides, E. (2004). Antifungal Activities of Posaconazole and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Ex Vivo and in Mice with Disseminated Infection Due to Scedosporium prolificans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 3801-3805 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pfaller, M. A., Espinel-Ingroff, A., Jones, R. N. (2004). Clinical Evaluation of the Sensititre YeastOne Colorimetric Antifungal Plate for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of the New Triazoles Voriconazole, Posaconazole, and Ravuconazole. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 4577-4580 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Trilles, L., Fernandez-Torres, B., dos Santos Lazera, M., Wanke, B., Guarro, J. (2004). In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility of Cryptococcus gattii. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 4815-4817 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Krieter, P., Flannery, B., Musick, T., Gohdes, M., Martinho, M., Courtney, R. (2004). Disposition of Posaconazole following Single-Dose Oral Administration in Healthy Subjects. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 3543-3551 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pfaller, M. A., Messer, S. A., Boyken, L., Tendolkar, S., Hollis, R. J., Diekema, D. J. (2004). Geographic Variation in the Susceptibilities of Invasive Isolates of Candida glabrata to Seven Systemically Active Antifungal Agents: a Global Assessment from the ARTEMIS Antifungal Surveillance Program Conducted in 2001 and 2002. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 3142-3146 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chau, A. S., Mendrick, C. A., Sabatelli, F. J., Loebenberg, D., McNicholas, P. M. (2004). Application of Real-Time Quantitative PCR to Molecular Analysis of Candida albicans Strains Exhibiting Reduced Susceptibility to Azoles. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 2124-2131 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Courtney, R., Radwanski, E., Lim, J., Laughlin, M. (2004). Pharmacokinetics of Posaconazole Coadministered with Antacid in Fasting or Nonfasting Healthy Men. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 804-808 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Xiao, L., Madison, V., Chau, A. S., Loebenberg, D., Palermo, R. E., McNicholas, P. M. (2004). Three-Dimensional Models of Wild-Type and Mutated Forms of Cytochrome P450 14{alpha}-Sterol Demethylases from Aspergillus fumigatus and Candida albicans Provide Insights into Posaconazole Binding. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 568-574 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Li, X., Brown, N., Chau, A. S., Lopez-Ribot, J. L., Ruesga, M. T., Quindos, G., Mendrick, C. A., Hare, R. S., Loebenberg, D., DiDomenico, B., McNicholas, P. M. (2004). Changes in susceptibility to posaconazole in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. J Antimicrob Chemother 53: 74-80 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dannaoui, E., Meis, J. F. G. M., Loebenberg, D., Verweij, P. E. (2003). Activity of Posaconazole in Treatment of Experimental Disseminated Zygomycosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3647-3650 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Rex, J. H., Pappas, P. G., Hamill, R. J., Larsen, R. A., Horowitz, H. W., Powderly, W. G., Hyslop, N., Kauffman, C. A., Cleary, J., Mangino, J. E., Lee, J. (2003). Antifungal Susceptibility Survey of 2,000 Bloodstream Candida Isolates in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3149-3154 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tortorano, A. M., Rigoni, A. L., Biraghi, E., Prigitano, A., Viviani, M. A., the FIMUA-ECMM candidaemia study group, (2003). The European Confederation of Medical Mycology ECMM) survey of candidaemia in Italy: antifungal susceptibility patterns of 261 non-albicans Candida isolates from blood. J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 679-682 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Courtney, R., Pai, S., Laughlin, M., Lim, J., Batra, V. (2003). Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Oral Posaconazole Administered in Single and Multiple Doses in Healthy Adults. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 2788-2795 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J. (2002). Role of Sentinel Surveillance of Candidemia: Trends in Species Distribution and Antifungal Susceptibility. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 3551-3557 [Full Text]  
  • Pfaller, M. A., Messer, S. A., Hollis, R. J., Jones, R. N., Diekema, D. J. (2002). In Vitro Activities of Ravuconazole and Voriconazole Compared with Those of Four Approved Systemic Antifungal Agents against 6,970 Clinical Isolates of Candida spp.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 1723-1727 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Messer, S. A., Boyken, L., Huynh, H., Hollis, R. J. (2002). Clinical Evaluation of a Frozen Commercially Prepared Microdilution Panel for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Seven Antifungal Agents, Including the New Triazoles Posaconazole, Ravuconazole, and Voriconazole. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 1694-1697 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pfaller, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pfaller, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. N.