Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2001, p. 3056-3058, Vol. 45, No. 11
Department of Infection, Guy's, King's and
St. Thomas' School of Medicine, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1
7EH, United Kingdom
Received 4 June 2001/Returned for modification 9 July 2001/Accepted 8 August 2001
Rifampin is the most potent drug used in the treatment of disease
due to Mycobacterium kansasii. A 69-bp fragment of
rpoB, the gene that encodes the Mycobacterium kansasii is
second only to Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare as a cause
of nontuberculous mycobacterial disease in the United States
(11). Since its introduction into clinical practice in
1971, rifampin has become a key component of multidrug regimens used to
treat M. kansasii. Clinical use of this drug is probably the
main reason for the success of short-course regimens and consequently
the abandonment of surgical resection as a treatment for pulmonary
disease (12). Although initial clinical isolates of
M. kansasii are almost universally susceptible to rifampin in vitro, acquired resistance in vivo has been well documented, usually
occurs against a background of suboptimal therapy, and significantly
compromises medical treatment options (2, 5, 15).
The mechanism of rifampin resistance in this species is unknown.
Mutations in the rpoB gene, which encodes the M. kansasii isolates.
Five rifampin-susceptible
clinical isolates of M. kansasii were obtained form our own
laboratory (nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5) and from the Scottish Mycobacteria
Reference Laboratory (no. 3). Five rifampin-resistant isolates were
obtained from our laboratory (no. 11), the Scottish Mycobacteria
Reference Laboratory (no. 12), and the Mycobacterium Reference Unit,
London (nos. 8, 9, and 10). All isolates were derived from sputum
samples obtained from different patients apart from one
rifampin-resistant strain (no. 12) isolated from homograft washing
fluid. All four patients with rifampin-resistant organisms had
previously been infected with rifampin-susceptible strains.
In vitro generation of rifampin-resistant strain.
A heavy
suspension of a rifampin-susceptible isolate (no. 1) was obtained by
inoculating culture material into Middlebrook 7H9 broth (Difco, Hemel
Hempstead, U.K.) and incubating at 37°C until heavy growth was
visible. A 4-ml aliquot of this suspension was put into a plastic tube
and centrifuged at 13,500 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was
discarded. The pellet was resuspended in 0.5 ml of distilled water, and
plated onto Middlebrook 7H11 (Difco) slants containing 8 mg of rifampin
per liter. The latter slants were prepared by adding rifampin solution
(Sigma) to molten agar, which was then poured into sterile Universal
containers and allowed to set. After incubation in room air for 3 weeks
at 37°C, a single colony (M1) was subcultured and maintained on
Löwenstein-Jensen slants.
Phenotypic rifamycin susceptibility testing.
Susceptibility
to rifampin and rifabutin was determined for all isolates using the
BACTEC 460 radiometric system (Becton Dickinson, Oxford, U.K.) using 2 mg/liter as the critical concentration for both drugs. E-test strips
(AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) were used in accordance with the
manufacturer's instructions (1) to estimate MICs of
rifampin for four susceptible (nos. 1 to 4) and five resistant (nos. 8, 9, 10, 12, and M1) isolates.
Bacterial DNA extraction and PCR amplification of
rpoB gene fragments.
Cells were suspended in 10 mM
Tris-1 mM EDTA-1% Triton X-100 at pH 8. Suspensions were heated to
95°C for 20 min and centrifuged at 13,500 rpm for 5 min. The
supernatant was then used as a template in the PCR. A 409-bp PCR
product was amplified from the rpoB gene using the following
primers, designed from published M. kansasii rpoB gene
sequences: MK1 (5'GCG GAT GAC CAC CCA GGA CG 3') and MK2
(5' GCG CGG TCC TC[C/T] TCG TCG GC 3'). This amplicon
included the region homologous to the 69-bp rifampin
resistance-determining region of M. tuberculosis. The 50-ml
reaction mixtures contained 2 U of Taq polymerase (Dynazyme II;
Flowgen, Kent, U.K.), 0.2 mM each of the four deoxynucleoside
triphosphates, 0.4 mM each primer (Pharmacia, St. Albans, U.K.), 1.5 mM
MgCl2, and 50 mM KCl. A Perkin-Elmer thermocycler was used
for the PCR with the following parameters: 95°C for 2 min, then 30 cycles of 95°C (15 s) and 70°C (60 s), followed by a 5-min
extension period at 72°C. PCR products were electrophoresed on a
1.5% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide and visualized using UV illumination.
DNA sequencing of PCR products.
Forward and reverse strands
of the PCR products were sequenced directly using a Thermo-sequenase
cycle sequencing kit (Amersham, Little Chalfont, U.K.) and an ALF DNA
sequencer (Pharmacia, St. Albans, U.K.). The following
5'-fluorescein-labeled primers were used to sequence an approximately
290-bp part of the amplicon: MKF1 (5' GGA GGC GAT CAC [A/G]CC
GCA GAC 3') and MKF2 (5' CGT GCG TAC ACC GAC AGC GA 3').
A Perkin-Elmer thermocycler was used for the sequencing reaction
with the following parameters: 25 cycles of 98°C for 15 s and
65°C for 30 s. A 69-bp region encompassing the rifampin
resistance-determining region of M. tuberculosis (codons 511 to 533, using numbering derived from the Escherichia coli
rpoB gene) was analyzed.
Phenotypic susceptibility to rifampin and rifabutin.
Using
BACTEC technology, there was complete concordance between rifampin and
rifabutin susceptibility in all isolates with the exception of isolate
12, which was rifabutin susceptible but rifampin resistant. The in
vitro-generated strain was also found to be rifampin and rifabutin
resistant. Using E-test, rifampin MICs were <1 mg/liter for four
rifampin-susceptible isolates and >256 mg/liter for five
rifampin-resistant ones (Fig. 1). Thus, mutations at all three loci in the rifampin-resistant isolates appeared
to be associated with high-level resistance.
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.11.3056-3058.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Rifampin Resistance in Mycobacterium
kansasii Is Associated with rpoB Mutations
and
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
subunit of the
bacterial RNA polymerase, was sequenced and found to be identical in
five rifampin-susceptible clinical isolates of M. kansasii.
This sequence showed 87% homology with the Mycobacterium
tuberculosis gene, with an identical deduced amino acid sequence.
In contrast, missense mutations were detected in the same fragment
amplified from five rifampin-resistant isolates. A rifampin-resistant
strain generated in vitro also harbored an rpoB gene
missense mutation that was not present in the parent isolate. All
mutations detected (in codons 513, 526, and 531) have previously been
described in rifampin-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates.
Rifampin MICs determined by E-test were <1 mg/liter for all
rifampin-susceptible isolates and >256 mg/liter for all rifampin-resistant ones. In addition, four of the five
rifampin-resistant isolates were also resistant to rifabutin. We have
thus shown a strong association between rpoB gene missense
mutations and rifampin resistance in M. kansasii. Although
our results are derived from a small number of isolates and
confirmation with larger numbers would be useful, they strongly suggest
that mutations within rpoB form the molecular basis of
rifampin resistance in this species.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
subunit of the RNA polymerase (the rifampin target), are found in around 95% of
rifampin-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates, mainly
concentrated in a 69-bp pair region (13, 14). Like
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, M. kansasii is usually highly
susceptible to rifampin, acquired resistance is usually high level, and
strains of intermediate susceptibility are uncommon (15,
19). It was on this basis that we hypothesized that rifampin
resistance in M. kansasii was likely to be due to single
mutational events affecting the rpoB gene, leading to the
development of high-level resistance. To test this hypothesis, we
analyzed a 69-bp segment of the rpoB gene in
rifampin-susceptible and -resistant M. kansasii isolates.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

View larger version (8K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Rifampin MICs as determined by E-test for four
rifampin-susceptible isolates (nos. 1 to 4, solid bars) and five
rifampin-resistant isolates (nos. 8, 9, 10, 12, and M1, open bar).
Nucleotide sequence analysis of rpoB gene of
rifampin-susceptible isolates.
The nucleotide sequence of the
69-bp fragment of the rpoB gene was identical in all five
rifampin-susceptible isolates and showed 87% homology with the
M. tuberculosis gene sequence (GenBank accession no. L27989)
(Fig. 2). The deduced amino acid sequence was identical to that of M. tuberculosis, reflecting the
conserved nature of this gene within mycobacteria. In addition, the
nucleotide sequence was identical to previously published M. kansasii rpoB gene sequences (GenBank accession no. AF060301).
|
Nucleotide sequence analysis of rpoB gene of rifampin-resistant isolates. Missense mutations were found within the 69-bp region amplified from all six rifampin-resistant isolates (Fig. 2). Four isolates (three clinical and one environmental) had a C-to-T mutation leading to a Ser531-Leu substitution. This is the commonest mutation found in rifampin-resistant clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis and Mycobacterium leprae (8, 14). One clinical isolate had a mutation leading to a Gln513-Leu substitution, and the in vitro-generated rifampin-resistant strain had an identical sequence to the parent isolate apart from a mutation encoding a His526-Tyr substitution. Mutations in one of these three codons have been found in over 80% of rifampin-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates (14).
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the molecular basis of rifampin resistance in M. kansasii. We have shown an association between missense mutations in a short segment of the rpoB gene and phenotypic rifampin resistance in five M. kansasii isolates. Moreover, an in vitro-derived rifampin-resistant strain was shown to have an rpoB mutation that was not present in the susceptible parent isolate. Although we cannot exclude other mechanisms, in the context of the recognized role of rpoB mutations in rifampin resistance in other mycobacteria, our data provide strong evidence for these being the primary basis for rifampin resistance in M. kansasii.
Rifampin resistance in M. tuberculosis has been shown to be predominantly due to mutations in an 81-bp region of the rpoB gene designated the rifampin resistance-determining region. Similar mechanisms appear to operate in M. leprae (8), although other mechanisms (such as cell membrane impermeability) may explain rifampin resistance in other mycobacteria, such as Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare (7, 18). Although we only studied six rifampin-resistant isolates, it is notable that four had the same nucleotide substitution in codon 531. This mutation is the most commonly found in rifampin-resistant M. tuberculosis and M. leprae clinical isolates and has recently been shown to be the most commonly found mutation in in vitro-selected rifampin-resistant mutants of M. tuberculosis (10). This may be explained by an intrinsically higher mutation frequency at this site, or by increased "fitness" associated with particular amino acid substitutions. In vitro evidence for the latter has been published for rifampin-resistant M. tuberculosis mutants (3), although in vivo data are lacking. Interestingly, the substituted amino acids in our rifampin-resistant strains reflected the most commonly found residues in clinical rifampin-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates.
In order to examine the degree of resistance conferred by each mutation, we determined the MICs using E-test. Although this is not standard methodology, the test appears to perform well for M. tuberculosis (16) and has been used for susceptibility testing of M. kansasii (6). In this study the E-test distinguished clearly between susceptible and resistant strains. The data also show that rpoB gene mutations in M. kansasii are associated with high-level resistance to rifampin, and in a single laboratory-generated mutant, we showed a rise in the MIC from <0.032 mg/liter in the parent isolate to >256 mg/liter associated with a mutation in the rpoB gene. There is some evidence that different rpoB gene mutations lead to different degrees of rifamycin resistance in M. tuberculosis. However, the commonest mutations detected in clinical isolates generally show high-level rifampin resistance and cross-resistance to other rifamycins such as rifabutin (4, 17). From our limited data, the three mutations detected in M. kansasii appear to be associated with high-level rifampin resistance, and all but one isolate showed cross-resistance to rifabutin.
In a large study from Texas, rifampin resistance occurred in approximately 4% of M. kansasii isolates, increased in frequency over the period from 1981 to 1992, and was strongly associated with previous suboptimal therapy and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection (15). Person-to-person transmission of this organism has never been confirmed, and consequently primary rifampin resistance has not been described. Treatment regimens for rifampin-resistant infections, although frequently successful, are complex and prolonged (2). If the molecular basis of rifampin resistance is confirmed to result from rpoB gene mutations in a larger number of M. kansasii isolates, hybridization assays could be designed to detect rifampin resistance in this organism at an earlier stage than is possible using conventional techniques. In view of recent studies using rpoB gene sequencing to determine mycobacterial species (9), analysis of this gene has the potential to provide rapid information on both species and rifampin susceptibility of organisms such as M. kansasii and M. tuberculosis.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to Andrew Middleton, who performed the BACTEC sensitivity testing, and to Francis Drobniewski and Brian Watt for providing isolates.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Infection, Guy's, King's and St. Thomas' School of Medicine, 5th Floor North Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 0207 928 9292. Fax: 44 0207 928 0730. E-mail: jlklein64{at}hotmail.com.
Present address: PHLS Mycobacterium Reference Unit, Dulwich Public
Health Laboratory, London SE22 8QF, United Kingdom.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | AB Biodisk. 1996. Susceptibility testing of mycobacteria. Etest Technical Guide no. 5. AB Biodisk, N.A., Inc., Piscataway, N.J. |
| 2. | Ahn, C. H., R. J. Wallace, Jr., L. C. Steele, and D. T. Murphy. 1987. Sulfonamide-containing regimens for disease caused by rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium kansasii. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 135:10-16[Medline]. |
| 3. |
Billington, O. J.,
T. D. McHugh, and S. H. Gillespie.
1999.
Physiological cost or rifampin resistance induced in vitro in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:1866-1869 |
| 4. |
Bodmer, T.,
G. Zürcher,
P. Imboden, and A. Telenti.
1995.
Mutation position and type of substitution in the subunit of the RNA polymerase influence in-vitro activity of rifamycins in rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
35:345-348 |
| 5. | Davidson, P. T., and R. Waggoner. 1976. Acquired resistance to rifampicin by Mycobacterium kansasii. Tubercle 57:271-273[Medline]. |
| 6. | Fabry, W., E. N. Schmid, and R. Ansorg. 1995. Comparison of the E test and a proportion dilution method for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium kansasii. Chemotherapy 41:247-252[Medline]. |
| 7. |
Guerrero, C.,
L. Stockman,
F. Marchesi,
T. Bodmer,
G. D. Roberts, and A. Telenti.
1994.
Evaluation of the rpoB gene in rifampicin-susceptible and -resistant Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
33:661-663 |
| 8. |
Honore, N., and S. T. Cole.
1993.
Molecular basis of rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium leprae.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
37:414-418 |
| 9. |
Kim, B.-J.,
S.-H. Lee,
M.-A. Lyu,
S.-J. Kim,
G.-H. Bai,
S.-J. Kim,
G.-T. Chae,
E.-C. Kim,
C.-Y. Cha, and Y.-H. Kook.
1999.
Identification of mycobacterial species by comparative sequence analysis of the RNA polymerase gene (rpoB).
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:1714-1720 |
| 10. |
Morlock, G. P.,
B. B. Plikaytis, and J. T. Crawford.
2000.
Characterization of spontaneous, in vitro-selected, rifampin-resistant mutants of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain H37Rv.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
44:3298-3301 |
| 11. | O'Brien, R. J., L. J. Geiter, and D. E. Snider, Jr. 1987. The epidemiology of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases in the United States. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 135:1007-1014[Medline]. |
| 12. | Pezzia, W., J. W. Raleigh, M. C. Bailey, E. A. Toth, and J. Silverblatt. 1981. Treatment of pulmonary disease due to Mycobacterium kansasii: recent experience with rifampin. Rev. Infect. Dis. 3:1035-1039[Medline]. |
| 13. | Ramaswamy, S., and J. M. Musser. 1998. Molecular genetic basis of antimicrobial agent resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: 1998 update. Tubercle Lung Dis. 79:3-29[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. | Telenti, A., P. Imboden, F. Marchesi, D. Lowrie, S. Cole, M. J. Colston, L. Matter, K. Schopfer, and T. Bodmer. 1993. Detection of rifampicin-resistance mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Lancet 341:647-650[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. | Wallace, R. J., Jr., D. Dunbar, B. A. Brown, G. Onyi, R. Dunlap, C. H. Ahn, and D. T. Murphy. 1994. Rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium kansasii. Clin. Infect. Dis. 18:736-743[Medline]. |
| 16. | Wanger, A., and K. Mills. 1996. Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis susceptibility to ethambutol, isoniazid, rifampicin, and streptomycin by using Etest. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1672-1676[Abstract]. |
| 17. |
Williams, D. L.,
L. Spring,
L. Collins,
L. P. Miller,
L. B. Heiferts,
P. R. J. Gangadharam, and T. P. Gillis.
1998.
Contribution of mutations to development of rifamycin cross-resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:1853-1857 |
| 18. |
Williams, D. L.,
C. Waguespack,
K. Eisenach,
J. T. Crawford,
F. Portaels,
M. Salfinger,
C. M. Nolan,
C. Abe,
V. Sticht-Groh, and T. P. Gillis.
1994.
Characterization of rifampin resistance in pathogenic mycobacteria.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38:2380-2386 |
| 19. | Yates, M. D., and C. H. Collins. 1981. Sensitivity of opportunist mycobacteria to rifampicin and ethambutol. Tubercle 62:117-121[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»