Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2001, p. 3223-3225, Vol. 45, No. 11
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.11.3223-3225.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Indication of Transposition of a Mobile DNA Element Containing
the vat(D) and erm(B) Genes in
Enterococcus faecium
Anette M.
Hammerum,1,2,*
Susan E.
Flannagan,2
Don B.
Clewell,2 and
Lars
Bogø
Jensen1
Danish Veterinary Laboratory, Bülowsvej
27, DK-1790 Copenhagen V, Denmark,1 and
Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, School of
Dentistry, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
481092
Received 13 April 2001/Returned for modification 18 June
2001/Accepted 16 August 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The vat(D) and erm(B) genes encoding
streptogramin resistance in Enterococcus faecium
transferred together, and a direct physical link between
erm(B) and vat(D) was detected. Both the
vat(D) and erm(B) probes hybridized
to fragments of different sizes in the donor and transconjugants, which
indicated a transposition event.
 |
TEXT |
The streptogramin complex
quinupristin-dalfopristin is used for treatment of infections with
multiresistant Enterococcus faecium in humans
(4). In contrast to humans, where streptogramins have been
used only rarely, another streptogramin complex, virginiamycin, has
been used widely as a growth promoter for broilers, pigs, and cattle in
Europe and is still used in the United States (8). In
Denmark streptogramins have not yet been used for human therapy, but
virginiamycin has been used for growth promotion in food animals for
decades (58,696 kg of active compound from 1989 to 1997)
(2), and the occurrence of resistance to virginiamycin has
frequently been observed among E. faecium isolates from
Danish livestock (1, 2).
(Part of this study was presented at the First International ASM
Conference on Enterococci: Pathogenesis, Biology, and Antibiotic Resistance, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 27 February to 2 March 2000.)
The vat(D) gene (formerly called satA) is known
to encode resistance to streptogramin A in E. faecium, and
the erm(B) gene encodes resistance to streptogramin B
together with lincosamines and macrolides (6, 9).
An E. faecium strain, F9631160-1 (here called 160-1), was
isolated from chicken feces in the Danish surveillance program (DANMAP) (3). E. faecium 160-1 is resistant to both
erythromycin (MIC > 32) and quinupristin-dalfopristin (MIC
32). The vat(D) and erm(B) genes were detected
on a large plasmid (>150 kb).
The streptogramin resistance was transferred by filter mating to a
plasmid-free recipient, E. faecium BM4105-RF
(3). One transconjugant, E. faecium AHA15, was
use as a donor in a new filter mating with the recipient, E. faecium BM4105-Str.
A second transconjugant, E. faecium 7.1, was selected and
studied further together with AHA15. Both AHA15 and 7.1 were resistant to erythromycin and quinupristin-dalfopristin. Neither transcojugants contained the large plasmid previously detected in E. faecium 160-1, but the presence of the erm(B) and
vat(D) genes was confirmed in each strain by PCR analysis
according to Hammerum et al. (3).
Total DNA from 160-1, AHA15, 7.1, BM4105-Str, and BM4105-RF was
analyzed. Hybridization with the erm(B) and
vat(D) probes to EcoRI-digested DNA (Fig.
1) showed that both the vat(D)
and the erm(B) genes were located on an approximately 6.6-kb
fragment in 160-1 and on an approximately 12-kb fragment in AHA15 and
7.1, suggesting a transposition event. None of the probes hybridized to
EcoRI-digested DNA from BM4105-RF and BM4105-Str. DNAs from five different transconjugants were cleaved with SmaI.
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and Southern hybridization with the
vat(D) probe indicated a location on bands of three
different sizes, again suggesting a transposition event (data not
shown).

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Southern blot of EcoRI-digested total DNA of
different E. faecium transconjugants from F9631160-1
hybridized with (A) the vat(D) probe or (B) the
erm(B) probe. Lane 1 and lane 7, lambda-HindIII
marker (0.5, 2.0, 2.3, 4.4, 6.6, 9.4, and 23.1 kb); lane 2, BM4105-RF;
lane 3, F9631160-1; lane 4, AHA15; lane 5, 7.1; lane 6, BM4105-Str.
|
|
The link between vat(D) and erm(B) was confirmed
in E. faecium 160-1 by PCR amplification using one primer
that binds within the vat(D) gene and one that binds within
the erm(B) gene. This PCR was preformed by using the Expand
long PCR system (Roche Diagnostics Gmbh, Mannheim, Germany). Use of
primers ErmB-1R and satA-418 (Table 1)
resulted in an amplicon of 2.3 kb.
A 4,010-bp fragment from E. faecium 160-1, obtained from the
extended PCR and PCR, was sequenced (Fig.
2) (GenBank accession no. AF368302). A
segment 1,417 bp in length was 100% identical to a previously cloned
vat(D) gene (GenBank accession no. L12033). Upstream of
vat(D), a 1,249-bp segment was found with 95% similarity to
a gene encoding a putative transposase detected in E. faecium (GenBank accession no. Y16413). The same segment had 95%
homology to a transposase gene from the multiresistance
Enterococcus faecalis plasmid pRE25 (GenBank accession
no. X92945). The transposase should not be functional, because a
termination is present after 334 bp (Fig. 2). Upstream of the
terminated transposase, a 1,175-bp segment with 100% homology
to erm(B) from the Streptococcus agalactiae plasmid pIP501 and multiresistance E. faecalis plasmid
pRE25 was detected (GenBank accession nos. X72021 and X92945) (Fig. 2).

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Structure of the sequenced plasmid fragment of E. faecium F9631160-1 (GenBank accession no. AF368302). (A) The small
arrows indicate the position of the primers used for PCR (see Table 1).
(B) The sizes and positions of genes are indicated. Open reading frame
3 (ORF3) is similar to two putative transposases but is terminated in
position 1506. (C) Lines indicate identities (given in percentages)
with DNA sequences identified below by their GenBank associations
numbers.
|
|
The primers in Table 1 were also used for PCR amplification of another
E. faecium chicken isolate from the DANMAP study
(F9630230-1, here called 230-1). Amplicons of the same size as those in
E. faecium 160-1 were found in E. faecium 230-1, indicating the same general structure. The vat(D) and
erm(B) genes were located on a large plasmid in strain
230-1; this plasmid could be transferred into both E. faecium and E. faecalis recipients and maintain the plasmid (data not shown).
In a previous work on an E. faecium isolate from humane
urine, both the vat(D) gene and the erm(B) gene
were located on a 10-kb fragment from a plasmid. This plasmid could not
be transferred by conjugation (B. Bozdogan, R. Leclercq, A. Lozniewski,
and M. Weber, Letter, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:2097-2098, 1999). In the present study, the
vat(D) and erm(B) genes could be transferred
together either by conjugation of a plasmid or by transposition of a
putative transposon, and futhermore, a direct physical link between
erm(B) and vat(D) was detected. A terminated open
reading frame, similar to two published transposases, was detected
between vat(D) and erm(B) in both 160-1 and
230-1. Its presence in both strains could indicate the presence of a
larger conserved fragment associated with the vat(D) and
erm(B) genes. The erm(B)-vat(D) gene
cluster might be integrated into a composite transposon like
Tn1547 (5) or Tn5385
(7), but further studies should define the limits of this
mobile element and its prevalence among streptogramin-resistant
E. faecium isolates.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The 4,010-bp fragment
from E. faecium 160-1 is registered as Genbank accession no.
AF368302.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Statens
Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark. Phone:
(45) 32 68 33 99. Fax: (45) 32 68 38 87. E-mail: ama{at}ssi.dk.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aarestrup, F. M.,
F. Bager,
N. E. Jensen,
M. Madsen,
A. Meyling, and H. C. Wegener.
1998.
Surveillance to antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from food animals to antimicrobial growth promoters and related therapeutic agents in Denmark.
APMIS
106:606-622[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Aarestrup, F. M.,
H. Kruse,
E. Tast,
A. M. Hammerum, and L. B. Jensen.
2000.
Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland and Norway.
Microb. Drug Res.
6:63-70.
|
| 3.
|
Hammerum, A. M.,
L. B. Jensen, and F. M. Aarestrup.
1998.
Detection of the satA gene and transferability of virginiamycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium from food animals.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
168:145-151[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Johnson, A. P., and D. M. Livermore.
1999.
Quinupristin/dalfopristin, a new addition to the antimicrobial arsenal.
Lancet
354:2012-2013[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Quintiliani, R., Jr., and P. Courvalin.
1996.
Characterization of Tn1547, a composite transposon flanked by the IS16 and IS256-like elements, that confers vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecalis BM4281.
Gene
172:1-8[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Rende-Fournier, R.,
R. Leclercq,
M. Galimand,
J. Duval, and P. Courvalin.
1993.
Identification of the satA gene encoding a streptogramin A acetyltransferase in Enterococcus faecium BM4145.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
37:2119-2125[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Rice, L. B., and L. L. Carias.
1998.
Transfer of Tn5385, a composite, multiresistance chromosomal element from Enterococcus faecalis.
J. Bacteriol.
180:714-721[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Thal, L. A., and M. J. Zervos.
1999.
Occurrence and epidemiology of resistance to virginiamycin and streptogramins.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
43:171-176[Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Weisblum, B.
1985.
Inducible resistance to macrolides, lincosamide and streptogramin type B antibiotics: the resistance phenotype, its biological diversity, and structural elements that regulate expression- a review.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
16(Suppl. A):63-90.
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2001, p. 3223-3225, Vol. 45, No. 11
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.11.3223-3225.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Hummel, A. S., Hertel, C., Holzapfel, W. H., Franz, C. M. A. P.
(2007). Antibiotic Resistances of Starter and Probiotic Strains of Lactic Acid Bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
73: 730-739
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Donabedian, S. M., Perri, M. B., Vager, D., Hershberger, E., Malani, P., Simjee, S., Chow, J., Vergis, E. N., Muder, R. R., Gay, K., Angulo, F. J., Bartlett, P., Zervos, M. J.
(2006). Quinupristin-Dalfopristin Resistance in Enterococcus faecium Isolates from Humans, Farm Animals, and Grocery Store Meat in the United States.. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 3361-3365
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jackson, C. R., Fedorka-Cray, P. J., Barrett, J. B., Ladely, S. R.
(2004). Effects of Tylosin Use on Erythromycin Resistance in Enterococci Isolated from Swine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
70: 4205-4210
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kehoe, L. E., Snidwongse, J., Courvalin, P., Rafferty, J. B., Murray, I. A.
(2003). Structural Basis of Synercid(R) (Quinupristin-Dalfopristin) Resistance in Gram-positive Bacterial Pathogens. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 29963-29970
[Abstract]
[Full Text]