This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Polonio, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Sperry, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Polonio, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Sperry, J. F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2001, p. 3262-3266, Vol. 45, No. 11
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.11.3262-3266.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Eradication of Biofilm-Forming Staphylococcus epidermidis (RP62A) by a Combination of Sodium Salicylate and Vancomycin

Roy E. Polonio,1 Leonard A. Mermel,2 Gregory E. Paquette,3 and Jay F. Sperry1,*

Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Molecular Genetics,1 and Clinical Laboratory Science Program,3 University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island 02881, and Division of Infectious Diseases, Brown University, and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island 029032

Received 25 August 2000/Returned for modification 5 January 2001/Accepted 8 August 2001


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Staphylococcus epidermidis is a major cause of infections associated with indwelling medical devices. Biofilm production is an important virulence attribute in the pathogenesis of device-related infections. Therefore, elimination of these biofilms is an ideal treatment. Salicylate (5 mM) combined with 1 µg of vancomycin per ml inhibited biofilm formation by S. epidermidis (RP62A) by >= 99.9%. When biofilm-coated polystyrene beads were exposed to 5 mM sodium salicylate and 4 µg of vancomycin per ml (one-half the minimum biofilm eradication concentration), there was a >99.9% reduction in viable count.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Catheter-related infections are among the most common nosocomial infections, accounting for significant morbidity and mortality (27, 32). In 1992, the annual cost incurred by these infections in the United States was estimated to exceed $4.5 billion (24). The most common etiologic agent of catheter-related infection is Staphylococcus epidermidis (15, 20, 35). Vancomycin is often used to treat these infections because of the frequent occurrence of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, including S. epidermidis. Vancomycin efficacy is reduced when S. epidermidis exists within a biofilm on the surfaces of indwelling medical devices (18, 31). Biofilm-producing S. epidermidis is usually involved in catheter-related infections (1, 33, 36). Resistance of biofilm bacteria to antibiotics may be due to a variety of factors, including changes in cell wall composition and surface structures (1, 2, 33). In view of the difficulty of the treatment of infections due to biofilm-producing bacteria, various measures for the prevention and treatment of catheter-related infections are being investigated. One intervention uses implants coated or impregnated with antimicrobial agents (8, 16, 22, 23, 26, 27).

Sodium salicylate has been demonstrated to have remarkable antibacterial activity, including the ability to enhance the activities of certain antibiotics. This drug inhibits adherence (55%), growth, and biofilm production of S. epidermidis (13, 28). It also enhances the in vitro and in vivo activities of amikacin against Klebsiella pneumoniae (10, 11) and increases the synergistic activity of imipenem and amikacin when they are used to treat K. pneumoniae infections in animals. The combined effect of vancomycin and sodium salicylate on S. epidermidis biofilms has not been reported. This study was designed to investigate the effect of sodium salicylate on the ability of vancomycin to inhibit biofilm production by S. epidermidis and to kill the bacteria.

S. epidermidis RP62A (ATCC 35984) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), and S. epidermidis (M7) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29213) were kind contributions of M. Hussain (Institute of Medical Microbiology, Muenster, Germany) and S. L. Josephson (Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, R.I.), respectively. Inhibition of biofilm formation was confirmed by an adherence-biofilm assay described previously (3, 4, 5 6, 21). Biofilm-negative mutant S. epidermidis M7 (34) served as a control. Briefly, aliquots (300 µl) of overnight cultures of S. epidermidis RP62A and M7 diluted (1:100) in Trypticase soy broth (TSB; Difco, Detroit, Mich.) were dispensed into each well of a sterile 96-well polystyrene microtiter plate (Corning, Corning, N.Y.). The plates were incubated in humidified conditions at 37°C for 24 h with shaking at 150 rpm. Wells with sterile TSB alone served as controls, and the mean optical density (OD) values for these wells was subtracted from the OD values for the test wells. Following incubation, the liquid was gently aspirated and replaced with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.3). Each well was rinsed three times and air dried. Adherent bacteria were fixed with 95% ethanol and then stained with crystal violet. The OD at 570 nm (OD570) was measured with a Micro-ELISA AutoReader (DYNEX MRX). Biofilm-producing strains were defined as those with a mean OD570 value >0.1 (21). Biofilm production by S. epidermidis (RP62A) was confirmed by an OD of 2.5 ± 0.16. Strain M7 strain did not form a biofilm (OD, 0.08 ± 0.01).

The MIC of vancomycin (Sigma Diagnostics, St. Louis, Mo.) was determined by broth microdilution in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB; Difco) by the procedures recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (29). The MIC of vancomycin for S. epidermidis (RP62A) was 2 µg/ml. The effect of 5 mM salicylate on the ability of vancomycin to inhibit biofilm formation was evaluated. Bacterial suspensions were added to serial dilutions of vancomycin such that the final inoculum was between 5 × 105 and 1 × 106 CFU/ml. For each trial, performed in triplicate, viable counts were performed with the inoculum. The following treatment regimens (final concentrations) in CAMHB were used: treatment A contained 1 µg of vancomycin per ml, treatment B contained 5 mM sodium salicylate and 1 µg of vancomycin per ml, treatment C contained 5 mM sodium salicylate, and treatment D contained CAMHB alone. The plates were incubated as described above. The relative inhibition of biofilm production (expressed as mean percentage) was determined as follows: 100 - [(OD570 of treated well/OD570 of reference well) × 100]. All treatment regimens inhibited biofilm production (Table 1). However, sodium salicylate was slightly more effective than 1 µg of vancomycin per ml (one-half the MIC). Vancomycin alone exerted a limited effect on the adherence and biofilm formation observed here and in previous studies (3, 28, 33). The combination treatment (treatment B) was more effective (P = 0.022) than treatment with vancomycin alone. Compared to the reference well, combination treatment reduced biofilm formation by >99.9%, giving an OD570 value <<0.1. Treatments A and C resulted in some degree of biofilm inhibition, but the bacteria were still producing a biofilm (Table 1). The OD values produced by the strain receiving treatment D were lower than those produced by the same bacterial strain in this assay (Fig. 1). This was most likely due to the presence of glucose in the TSB used in this assay but not in CAMHB used in the other assays. Glucose enhances biofilm production (21). Despite the absence of glucose in CAMHB, remarkable biofilm production was still observed, and treatment regimen D remained appropriate as a reference for comparison of inhibition of biofilm production.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Summary data (OD values) on inhibition of S. epidermidis biofilm formationa



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Biofilm production by S. epidermidis (RP62A). S. epidermidis M7 was included as a negative control. TSB represents the microtiter well that contained only TSB. Strains were tested in quadruplicate. An OD570 >= 0.1 represents biofilm production.

A polystyrene bead adherence assay was set up with bacterial suspensions between 5 × 105 and 1 × 106 CFU/ml. An aliquot (15 µl) of diluted cell suspensions (~107 CFU/ml) was dispensed into each culture tube containing one sterile polystyrene bead (diameter, 5.5 mm; Precision Plastic Ball Co., Franklin Park, Ill.) immersed in 300 µl of CAMHB, and the treatment regimens described above were used. The tubes were incubated in humidified conditions at 37°C for 24 h with shaking at 150 rpm (model G-10; New Brunswick Scientific Co., Inc.). Following incubation, the medium was gently aspirated and replaced three times with sterile PBS, and then the beads were placed into a solution (500 µl) containing 0.5% Tween 80 and 10 mM EDTA for 10 min. The number of bacteria that adhered to and formed a biofilm on the beads after treatment was determined by vigorously vortexing (Fischer Vortex-Genie 2, model G-560; Scientific Industries, Inc., Bohemia, N.Y.) the beads for 3 min; the liquid was serially diluted and the bacteria were enumerated by the viable count method. Ultrasonic treatment was unnecessary for the release of bacteria, since our preliminary study showed that vortexing had a recovery efficiency >97%. This is consistent with the level of biofilm cell removal reported previously (37). When the effects of the treatments on biofilm formation were determined, the mean numbers CFU released from the bead in each control tube served as the reference inoculum for the corresponding experiment. Relative inhibition of biofilm production was determined as follows: 100 - [(CFU of treated bead/CFU of reference bead) × 100]. In the viable count assay, the level of inhibition by treatment A was 64.1% and the level of inhibition by treatment C was 82%. Treatment B was most effective (significantly more effective than treatment A [P = 0.03]), inhibiting biofilm formation >= 99.9% (Table 2).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   Summary data (polystyrene beads) on inhibition of S. epidermidis biofilm formationa

The minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) of vancomycin was determined by a broth macrodilution method in CAMHB, as described by NCCLS, with some modifications. The MBEC of vancomycin for S. epidermidis biofilms was 8 µg/ml and the MIC was 4 µg/ml (Table 3). This allowed us to assess the effect of sodium salicylate on the bactericidal activity of one-half the MBEC of vancomycin (4 µl/ml). Adherent inocula (between 5 × 105 and 1.5 × 106 CFU/bead) were generated by incubating each bead (with shaking at 37°C) for 18 to 20 h with bacteria (~107 CFU/ml) suspended in CAMHB. Following incubation, biofilm-coated beads were rinsed to remove the nonadherent bacteria (37). The number of bacteria in the biofilm was determined as described above. Two beads were randomly selected and were used to establish a representative, mean adherent inoculum for that evaluation. A standard inoculum size, verified by determination of viable counts, served as a reference point for assessment of bacterial killing. Beads colonized with an S. epidermidis biofilm were placed in selected dilutions of vancomycin, and the mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 24 h with shaking at 150 rpm. After incubation, the beads were rinsed as described above. Adherent bacteria were released and enumerated, and the percent killing of adherent bacteria was calculated as follows: 100 - [(CFU of treated bead/CFU of untreated bead [reference inoculum]) × 100]. The MBEC was defined as the minimum concentration of vancomycin required to reduce biofilm cell numbers (initial inoculum size) >= 99.9%. Assays were performed in parallel against adherent standard inoculum; treatment A contained 4 µg of vancomycin per ml, treatment B contained 5 mM sodium salicylate and 4 µg of vancomycin per ml, treatment C contained 5 mM sodium salicylate, and treatment D contained CAMHB alone. After incubation, the beads were processed as described above. Treatment D served as a reference for evaluation of the efficacy of treatment on biofilm bacteria. Percent biofilm growth reduction was defined as: 100 - [(CFU of treated bead/CFU of reference bead of regimen D) × 100]. Treatment B exerted a pronounced bactericidal effect on biofilm bacteria, resulting in a mean reduction in viable count of >3 log10 CFU/bead (>99.9%) (Fig. 2). Neither treatment A nor treatment C had any significant effect on biofilm eradication. However, they both demonstrated some bacteriostatic activity against biofilm bacteria (Table 4). In this work, inhibition of biofilm formation and eradication of established biofilms were evaluated with S. epidermidis RP62A (ATCC 35984), which was isolated from a patient with intravascular catheter-associated sepsis (6). It has been characterized as a proficient biofilm producer, thereby making it an ideal strain for studies on the prevention and treatment of device-related infections involving bacterial biofilms.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3.   MBECs of vancomycin for S. epidermidis biofilmsa



View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   Number of viable biofilm cells recovered following a 24-h exposure to vancomycin, sodium salicylate, and a combination thereof. Each bar represents viable counts obtained from tests in the three independent evaluations. The representative inoculum size () was determined for each of the evaluations. , vancomycin (4 µg/ml) only; , salicylate (5 mM) plus vancomycin (4 µg/ml); , salicylate (5 mM) only.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4.   Effect of salicylate in combination with one-half the MBEC of vancomycin on S. epidermidis biofilms

The data presented in Table 4 and Fig. 2 provide compelling evidence that one-half the MBEC of vancomycin combined with 5 mM salicylate reduced the viable counts of biofilm cells >99.9%, therefore effectively eradicating established S. epidermidis biofilms. All treatments had some bacteriostatic effect on biofilm growth (Table 4).

The mechanisms behind reduced antibiotic susceptibility remain a topic of ongoing debate, but unlike the genetically mediated antibiotic resistance developed by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) (30), resistance in biofilm-producing bacteria may be a function of the biofilm itself (7, 14). The bacteria in biofilms acquire attachment-specific phenotypes, such as a reduced growth rate, which, in concert with the extracellular components, make them resistant to conventional treatment (7, 14). In the biofilm milieu, the extracellular substance may act as an ion-exchange matrix and may bind to charged antibiotics, limiting antibiotic availability, diffusion, and penetration (14).

The concerted effects of salicylate in combination, as presented here, are not fully understood. Salicylate is a chelator of divalent cations, and this may have influenced the assay system in one or more ways, including distortion of the surface charge on bacterial cell membranes, thereby impairing nutrient uptake, translocation, adherence, and biofilm formation (9, 12). As a chelator of divalent cations, salicylate may have depleted the pool of potential cofactors for enzymes essential for synthesis of the polysaccharide constituents of the biofilm. This study used 5 mM salicylate, equivalent to ~800 µg/ml, a concentration above the therapeutic range for aspirin (200 to 350 µg/ml). However, 5 mM has been among the lower concentrations of this drug used in studies of bacteriology (17, 28), suggesting its appropriateness in our research efforts to better understand salicylate's potential role in combined therapy.

Prophylactic administration of vancomycin or teicoplanin during catheter insertion fails to prevent intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infections (19, 25; G. Pellizzer, R. Nicolin, A. D'Emilio, G. Figoli, L. Bragagnolo, and F. Merio, Abstr. 35th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. J89, p. 273, 1995). To reduce the risk of acquisition of VRE, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recommended against the use of these antibiotics as prophylaxis (4). Our in vitro studies, however, indicate that the antistaphylococcal efficacy of vancomycin is significantly enhanced when vancomycin is used in conjunction with salicylate. Further work is needed to determine if this combination is clinically useful for the prevention or treatment of intravascular device-related infections.

In conclusion, this study has shown that (i) sodium salicylate significantly enhances the antistaphylococcal activity of vancomycin, (ii) a combination of one-half the MIC of vancomycin and 5 mM salicylate effectively prevents biofilm formation, and (iii) a combination of one-half the MBEC of vancomycin and 5 mM sodium salicylate effectively kills the bacteria in biofilms, reducing the viable biofilm cell numbers by >3 log10 CFU. If the in vitro data presented herein could be confirmed in vivo with an appropriate animal model, the salicylate-vancomycin combination may be useful for the prevention and treatment of intravascular catheter-related infections caused by S. epidermidis.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank David Laux (Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Rhode Island) and Harrold Bibb (Department of Biological Sciences, University of Rhode Island) for constructive criticism of the manuscript, Clinton Chichester III (Biomedical Sciences, University of Rhode Island) for assistance with the Micro-ELISA AutoReader that he kindly provided, and Steven Reinert (Lifespan Medical Computing, Providence, R.I.) for the statistical analysis of the data.

This study was supported by the Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Molecular Genetics at the University of Rhode Island, Kingston.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881. Phone (401) 874-5900. Fax: (401) 874-2202. E-mail: jsp2116u{at}postoffice.uri.edu.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Anwar, H., and J. W. Costerton. 1992. Effective use of antibiotics in the treatment of biofilm-associated infections. ASM News 58:665-668.
2. Carlsson, J. 1997. Bacterial metabolism in dental biofilms. Adv. Dent. Res. 11:75-80[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Carsenti-Etesse, H., J. Durant, J. Entenza, V. Mondain, C. Padier, E. Bernard, and P. Dellamonica. 1993. Effects of subinhibitory concentrations of vancomycin and teicoplanin on adherence of staphylococci tissue culture plates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:921-923[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1994. Recommendations for preventing the spread of vancomycin resistance. Recommendations of the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). Morbid. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 44:1-13.
5. Christensen, G. D., J. T. Parisi, A. L. Bisno, W. A. Simpson, and E. H. Beachey. 1985. Characterization of clinically significant strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 18:258-269.
6. Christensen, G. D., W. A. Simpson, J. J. Younger, L. M. Baddour, F. F. Barrett, D. M. Melton, and E. H. Beachey. 1985. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J. Clin. Microbiol. 22:996-1006[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Costerton, J. W. 1995. Overview of microbial biofilms. J. Ind. Microbiol. 15:137-140[CrossRef][Medline].
8. Darouiche, R. O., I. I. Raad, S. O. Heard, J. I. Thornby, O. C. Wenker, A. Gabrielli, J. Berg, N. Khardori, H. Hanna, R. Hachem, R. L. Harris, and G. Mayhall. 1999. A comparison of two antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters. N. Engl. J. Med. 340:1-8[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Deighton, M., and R. Borland. 1993. Regulation of slime production in Staphylococcus epidermidis by iron limitation. Infect. Immun. 61:4473-4479[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. Domenico, P., D. C. Straus, D. E. Woods, and B. A. Cunha. 1993. Salicylate potentiates amikacin therapy in rodent models of Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. J. Infect. Dis. 168:766-769[Medline].
11. Domenico, P., T. Hopkins, and B. A. Cunha. 1990. The effect of sodium salicylate on antibiotic susceptibility and synergy in Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 26:343-351[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Domenico, P., S. Schwartz, and B. A. Cunha. 1989. Reduction of capsular polysaccharide production in Klebsiella pneumoniae by sodium salicylate. Infect. Immun. 57:3778-3782[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Farber, B. F., and A. G. Wolff. 1992. The use of nonsteroidal antiinfammatory drugs to prevent adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis to medical polymers. J. Infect. Dis. 166:861-865[Medline].
14. Gilbert, P., J. Das, and I. Foley. 1997. Biofilm susceptibility to antimicrobials. Adv. Dent. Res. 11:160-167[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Huebner, J., and D. A. Goldmann. 1999. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: role as pathogens. Annu. Rev. Med. 50:223-236[CrossRef][Medline].
16. Jansen, B., and G. Peters. 1991. Modern strategies in the prevention of polymer associated infections. J. Hosp. Infect. 19:83-88[CrossRef][Medline].
17. Kang, G., K. A. Balasubramanian, R. Koshi, M. M. Mathan, and V. I. Mathan. 1998. Salicylate inhibits fimbriae mediated HEp-2 cell adherence of and haemagglutination by enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 16:257-265[CrossRef].
18. Lee, C. K., L. G. Rubin, and R. M. Molwin. 1994. Synergy between protamine and vancomycin in the treatment of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Urology 45:720-724[CrossRef].
19. Ljungman, P., H. Hagglund, B. Bjorkstrand, B. Lonnqvist, and O. Ringden. 1997. Perioperative teicoplanin for prevention of gram-positive infections in neutropenic patients with indwelling central venous catheters: a randomized controlled study. Supp. Care Cancer 5:485-488.
20. Mack, D. 1999. Molecular mechanisms of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation. J. Hosp. Infect. 43(Suppl. SI):13-25[CrossRef][Medline].
21. Mack, D., N. Siemseen, and R. Laufs. 1992. Parallel induction by glucose of adherence and a polysaccharide antigen specific for plastic-adherent Staphylococcus epidermidis: evidence for functional relation to intercellular adherence. Infect. Immun. 60:2048-2057[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Maki, D. G., J. K. Garman, J. M. Shapiro, M. Ringer, and R. B. Helgerson. 1988. An attachable silver-impregnated cuff for prevention of infection with central venous catheters: a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Am. J. Med. 85:307-314[CrossRef][Medline].
23. Maki, D. G., S. M. Stolz, S. Wheeler, and L. A. Mermel. 1997. Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter. A randomized controlled trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 127:257-266[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24. Martone, W. J., W. O Jarvis, J. R. Edwards, D. H. Culver, and R. H. Haley. 1998. Incidence and nature of endemic and epidemic nosocomial infection, p. 461-476. In J. W. Bennet, and P. S. Bruchman (ed.), Hospital infection, 4th ed. Lippincott Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
25. McKee, R., R. Dunsmuir, M. Wnitby, and O. J. Garden. 1985. Does antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of catheter insertion reduce the incidence of catheter-related sepsis in intravenous nutrition? J. Hosp. Infect. 6:419-425[CrossRef][Medline].
26. Mermel, L. A., S. M. Stolz, and D. G. Maki. 1993. Surface antimicrobial activity of heparin-bonded and antiseptic-impregnated vascular catheters. J. Infect. Dis. 167:920-924[Medline].
27. Mermel, L. A. 2000. Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Ann. Intern. Med. 132:391-402[Abstract/Free Full Text].
28. Muller, E., J. Al-Attar, A. G. Wolff, and B. F. Farber. 1998. Mechanism of salicylate-mediated inhibition of biofilm in Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Infect. Dis. 117:501-503.
29. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1998. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility test for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard M7-A4, 4th ed. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
30. Noble, W. C., Z. Virani, and R. Cree. 1992. Co-transfer of vancomycin and other resistance genes from Enterococcus faecalis NCTC 12201 to Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 93:195-198[CrossRef].
31. Raad, I., A. Alarahwan, and K. Rolston. 1998. Staphylococcus epidermidis: emerging resistance and need for alternative agents. Clin. Infect. Dis. 26:1182-1187[Medline].
32. Richards, M. J., J. R. Edwards, D. H. Culver, and R. P. Gaynes. 1999. Nosocomial infections in medical intensive care units in the United States. National nosocomial infections surveillance system. Crit. Care Med. 27:887-892[CrossRef][Medline].
33. Rupp, M. E., and K. E. Hamer. 1998. Effect of subinhibitory concentrations of vancomycin, cefazolin, ofloxacin, L-ofloxacin and D-ofloxacin on adherence to intravascular catheters and biofilm formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 41:155-161[Abstract/Free Full Text].
34. Schumacher-Pedreau, F., C. Heilmann, G. Peters, F. Gotz, and G. Pulverer. 1994. Comparative analysis of a biofilm-forming Staphylococcus epidermidis strain and its adhesion-positive, accumulation-negative mutant M7. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 117:71-78[CrossRef][Medline].
35. Sitges-Serra, A., and M. Girvent. 1999. Catheter-related blood stream infections. World J. Surg. 23:589-595[CrossRef][Medline].
36. Soboh, F., A. E. Khoury, A. C. Zamboni, D. Davidson, and M. W. Mittleman. 1995. Effects of ciprofloxacin and protamine sulfate combinations against catheter-associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:1281-1286[Abstract].
37. Zimmerli, W., R. Frei, A. F. Widmer, and Z. Rajacic. 1994. Microbiological tests to predict treatment outcome in experimental device-related infections due to Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 33:959-967[Abstract/Free Full Text].


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2001, p. 3262-3266, Vol. 45, No. 11
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.11.3262-3266.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Opperman, T. J., Kwasny, S. M., Williams, J. D., Khan, A. R., Peet, N. P., Moir, D. T., Bowlin, T. L. (2009). Aryl Rhodanines Specifically Inhibit Staphylococcal and Enterococcal Biofilm Formation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 4357-4367 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bandara, M. B. K., Zhu, H., Sankaridurg, P. R., Willcox, M. D. P. (2006). Salicylic Acid Reduces the Production of Several Potential Virulence Factors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Associated with Microbial Keratitis.. IOVS 47: 4453-4460 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Blanco, A. R., Sudano-Roccaro, A., Spoto, G. C., Nostro, A., Rusciano, D. (2005). Epigallocatechin Gallate Inhibits Biofilm Formation by Ocular Staphylococcal Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 4339-4343 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pettit, R. K., Weber, C. A., Kean, M. J., Hoffmann, H., Pettit, G. R., Tan, R., Franks, K. S., Horton, M. L. (2005). Microplate Alamar Blue Assay for Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilm Susceptibility Testing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 2612-2617 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wu, J. A., Kusuma, C., Mond, J. J., Kokai-Kun, J. F. (2003). Lysostaphin Disrupts Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilms on Artificial Surfaces. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3407-3414 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Polonio, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Sperry, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Polonio, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Sperry, J. F.