Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2001, p. 3635-3639, Vol. 45, No. 12
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.12.3635-3639.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Multidrug Resistant Mycobacterium
leprae from Patients with Leprosy
Shinji
Maeda,1,2
Masanori
Matsuoka,1,*
Noboru
Nakata,1
Masanori
Kai,1
Yumi
Maeda,1
Ken
Hashimoto,1
Hiroaki
Kimura,1
Kazuo
Kobayashi,2 and
Yoshiko
Kashiwabara1
Leprosy Research Center, National Institute
of Infectious Diseases, Higashimurayama-shi, Tokyo
189-0002,1 and Department of Host
Defense, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585,2 Japan
Received 4 May 2001/Returned for modification 8 August
2001/Accepted 17 September 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Sequences of the folP1, rpoB,
and gyrA genes were analyzed for 88 isolates of
Mycobacterium leprae from leprosy patients in Japan,
Haiti, Indonesia, Pakistan, and the Philippines. Thirteen isolates
(14.8%) showed representative mutations in more than two genes,
suggesting the emergence of multidrug-resistant M. leprae.
 |
TEXT |
Leprosy is a chronic infectious
disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae and is still a major
health problem in several countries of Asia, Latin America, and Africa.
Global efforts to control leprosy by intensive chemotherapy have led to
a significant decrease in the number of registered patients. However,
the annual reports of new cases indicate more than 500,000 even after
the introduction of multidrug therapy (MDT) by the World Health
Organization (WHO) (19). Current recommended control
measures for treating leprosy with MDT are designed to prevent the
spread of drug-resistant M. leprae. However, drug resistance
has been reported since 1964 for dapsone (12), 1976 for
rifampin (5), and 1996 for ofloxacin (7).
To prevent the emergence and transmission of multidrug-resistant (MDR)
leprosy and to identify and treat existing cases of MDR leprosy, it is
necessary to establish rapid methods for detection of drug resistance
in M. leprae. However, M. leprae has not been cultivated on artificial media; therefore, to identify drug
susceptibility patterns, bacteria must be tested using Shepard's mouse
footpad assay (14). This in vivo method requires at least
6 months and relatively large numbers of bacteria. Recently, there have
been advances in the elucidation of molecular events responsible for drug resistance in mycobacteria (6, 11, 13).
In the present study, we analyzed the DNA sequences of particular
regions of M. leprae folP1, rpoB, and
gyrA, which are responsible for resistance to dapsone,
rifampin, and fluoroquinolones, respectively. Several M. leprae isolates showed point mutations in the genes. These results
suggest the emergence of MDR M. leprae.
Bacterial isolates and materials.
A total of 88 M. leprae isolates, obtained from patients receiving antileprosy
chemotherapy, were used in this study. The treatments and status of the
leprosy patients are listed in Table 1.
The treatment history for the patient from whom Zensho-4 was isolated
has been described in detail (10). All available details of the cases are listed; however, for some cases, the details are
unclear because records were not available. The patients in Japan were
individually taking original medical treatments, including monotherapy.
The patients in countries other than Japan received the WHO treatment
regimen for multibacillary leprosy, except for a Pakistani case.
For patients whose condition was improved by medical treatment had a
return of leprosy with an increasing bacillary index after 5 to 10 years, the word "relapse" is used in Table 1. In cases Haiti-1 and
Peshawar-5, the condition did not improve, though the patients were
treated continuously. M. leprae isolates were obtained from
biopsy samples of patients with leprosy (multibacillary type) or from
footpads of mice infected with M. leprae: Japan (21 cases:
15 biopsy samples and 6 footpads), Haiti (l biopsy sample), Indonesia
(30 biopsy samples), Pakistan (8 biopsy samples), and Philippines (28 biopsy samples). The Thai 53 strain of M. leprae, which was
obtained from a patient with lepromatous leprosy in Thailand, was
established at the Leprosy Research Center, National Institute of
Infectious Diseases, Japan, by passages in nude mice. Informed
consent was obtained from all patients, and human experimentation guidelines of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, were
followed.
Sample preparation for PCR.
Thai 53 was used as an
antimicrobial-sensitive standard. Leprosy bacilli were purified from
infected tissues, and extraction of chromosomal DNA was carried out as
previously described (2, 3).
PCR amplification and DNA sequencing.
PCR was carried out
using Ex Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Shuzo Co., Shiga, Japan)
in a 50-µl volume containing 150 ng of genomic DNA and 1 µM
concentrations of the primers, which were designed according to
the sequence of the folP1 (accession no. AL023093), rpoB (Z14314), and gyrA (Z70722) genes of
M. leprae. The primers used for amplification of the
folP1 gene were folP1-1 (5'-GCTTCTCGTGCCGAAGCGCTCG-3') and folP1-2
(5'-GCCATCGCGGGATCTGCTCGCCCA-3'). The primers for the
rpoB gene were rpoB-1
(5'-CAGACGCTGATCAATATCCGT-3') and rpoB-2
(5'-TACGGTGTTTCGATGAACCCG-3'). For the gyrA gene,
gyrA-1 (5'-ATGACTGATATCACGCTGCCA-3') and gyrA-2
(5'-ATAACGCATCGCTGCCGGTGG-3') were used. The target regions
of the rpoB and gyrA genes were amplified by a PC
800 thermal cycler (Astech Co., Fukuoka, Japan) with a program of
30 s at 95°C, 2 min at 50°C, and 3 min at 72°C for 40 cycles. For amplification of the target region of the folP1 gene, the cycling conditions were 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 2 min, and 72°C for 3 min for 35 cycles. DNA samples for sequencing
were recovered from agarose gels using an Easy Trap DNA purification kit (Takara Shuzo) after electrophoresis and ligated to pGEM-T vector
(Promega Co., Madison, Wis.). At least two independent clones were
subjected to sequencing. Both strands of recombinant plasmids were
sequenced with a BigDye terminator cycle sequencing FS Ready Reaction
kit (Perkin-Elmer Applied Bio systems, Norwalk, Conn.) and an ABI Prism
310 genetic analyzer (Perkin-Elmer). The nucleotide sequences obtained
were analyzed by the DNASIS computer program (Hitachi Software
Engineering, Yokohama, Japan).
Mouse footpad assay.
The in vivo drug susceptibility of
M. leprae was determined by the method of Shepard
(14). The conditions of the assay were as previously
described (10).
Dapsone resistance.
The involvement of two mutations in the
folP1 gene of dapsone-resistant M. leprae has
been reported (9, 17). In this study, 19 isolates showed
the reported mutations in the folP1 gene. One isolate
(Zensho-3) showed mutations at positions 157 and 164. They corresponded
to Thr
Ala and Pro
Leu at amino acid positions 53 and 55 in
dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS), respectively (Table
2). Nine isolates showed an A
G
mutation in codon 157 (M. leprae numbering
[9]), and three isolates had a C
T mutation in codon
158 (Fig. 1). These mutations caused
Thr
Ala and Thr
Ile changes at position 53 in DHPS, respectively.
Eight isolates (one isolate overlaps because of a double mutation)
showed a C-to-T mutation (Pro
Leu) at codon 164 (position 55 of
DHPS).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Nucleotide sequence of the folP1 gene
from Thai 53 and clinical isolates of M. leprae. A DNA
fragment of folP1 (388 bp) was amplified by PCR and
sequenced. In 19 isolates of M. leprae, mutations at
positions 53 and 55, which were found to be associated with dapsone
resistance, were detected (the numbering system of reference
9 was used). The numbers of cases which had a mutation are
shown. One isolate was overlapping in this figure because it had
mutations at positions 157 and 164.
|
|
Rifampin resistance.
Mutations in the rpoB gene,
encoding the
subunit of RNA polymerase, were reported to result in
resistance to rifampin in several mycobacterial species, including
M. leprae (4, 18). In the present study, 26 isolates showed the mutations which had already been observed in
rifampin-resistant bacteria (Fig. 2). A
mutation at histidine 526 (numbering system used in reference 16) was reported frequently in Mycobacterium
tuberculosis (16, 18) but not in M. leprae. The change from aspartic acid to asparagine at position
516 has not been reported for mycobacteria but has been observed in
Escherichia coli (8). This is the first report that these mutations (His to Tyr at 526 and Asp to Asn at 516) occur in
rifampin-resistant M. leprae. Among 26 isolates harboring mutations in rpoB, two exhibited a mutation at 516 and 11 showed the mutation at histidine 526, showing a tendency similar to
that seen in M. tuberculosis. Thirteen isolates had
mutations (Ser to Leu or Trp) at position 531. One isolate (Shinsei-1)
showed a double mutation, Asp
Asn at 516 and Leu
Pro at position
533 (Table 2).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
DNA sequence of the rpoB gene from
clinical isolates of M. leprae. The rpoB
sequence from positions 1243 to 1547 was amplified and analyzed.
Twenty-six isolates had a mutation at position 441 (516), 451 (526),
456 (531), or 458 (533) (E. coli numbering in
parentheses [16]). One isolate had mutations at
positions 441 (516) and 458 (533).
|
|
Ofloxacin resistance.
Mutations in the quinolone
resistance-determining region of gyrA were also reported for
quinolone-resistant mycobacteria (15). Only one case of
quinolone resistance in leprosy was reported, from Mali
(1). One mutation (Ala
Val at position 91) was detected in five isolates of M. leprae, and another mutation
(Gly
Cys at position 89) was found as in quinolone-resistant M. tuberculosis (15) (Fig.
3).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Structure and nucleotide sequence of the
gyrA gene from clinical isolates of M.
leprae. To analyze the sequence, the gyrA
sequence from positions 1 to 390 was amplified by PCR. Mutations at
positions 89 and 91 were found in ofloxacin-resistant M.
leprae. The numbering system of reference 1 was
used.
|
|
The drug susceptibilities of Airaku-2, Airaku-3, Zensho-4, and Zensho-5
were confirmed by mouse footpad assay. In the assay, both Airaku-2 and
Airaku-3 were dapsone resistant (Table 2). They showed a mutation in
the folP1 gene that has been demonstrated to be responsible
for dapsone resistance. In Airaku-3, rpoB and gyrA had a wild-type sequence. However, the results of the
footpad assay showed that Airaku-3 was rifampin resistant and ofloxacin susceptible. The mutations in rpoB did not account for
rifampin resistance in Airaku-3. Therefore, it is likely that Airaku-3 acquired rifampin resistance by other mechanisms, such as changes in
membrane permeability and function of the efflux pump. In Zensho-4, mutations were detected in the folP1, rpoB, and
gyrA genes. The mouse footpad assay revealed that the
isolate had acquired dapsone, rifampin, and ofloxacin resistance
(10) as a result of these mutations. Also, it was found
that the mutations in the folP1 and rpoB genes
brought on resistance to dapsone and rifampin in Zensho-5, as confirmed
in the mouse footpad assay.
The most striking finding was that M. leprae frequently
harbored more than two mutations, suggesting multidrug resistance in
this cohort of patients who did not respond to treatment. As shown in
Table 2, 11 isolates had mutations in two genes (resistance to two
drugs), and 2 strains (Shinsei-1 and Zensho-4) showed mutations in
three genes (resistance to three drugs). MDR M. leprae
(resistant to dapsone, rifampin, and ofloxacin) was first reported in
1997 (1). However, the DNA sequence of folP1
was not analyzed for confirmation of dapsone resistance in that study.
We clearly showed both genetic and mouse footpad confirmation for MDR
leprosy (Zensho-4).
Generally, discontinuation of treatments and monotherapy play a major
role in production of MDR bacilli. The drug-resistant M. leprae generated in the past may recur in Japanese patients. Furthermore, new cases in developing countries had drug-resistant M. leprae. MDR M. tuberculosis has become a major
problem globally. We should take prompt measures against MDR M. leprae, because leprosy is caused by mycobacteria like M. tuberculosis. However, WHO has not yet considered drug-resistant
M. leprae. Our results strongly suggest the importance of a
survey of drug resistance in leprosy as well as the establishment of
rapid methods for detection of drug-resistant leprosy bacilli. Genetic
analysis may provide a powerful tool for rapid detection of
drug-resistant M. leprae and important information on chemotherapy.
In this study, other mutations were also detected in folP1,
rpoB, and gyrA (data not shown). However, it is
not clear that such mutations are linked to drug resistance in M. leprae, because there have been no reports on the positions of
mutations which are responsible for drug resistance. We are
investigating the relationship between genotypic mutations and
phenotypic resistance using M. leprae isolates in the mouse
footpad assay.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Eiji Nagao (National Sanatorium Oshimaseishoen, Kagawa,
Japan), Kunihiro Kinjoh (National Sanatorium Okinawa Airakuen, Okinawa,
Japan), Masako Namisato (National Sanatorium Tamazenshoen, Tokyo,
Japan), Masamichi Goto (Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University,
Kagoshima, Japan), Atsushi Hosokawa (Faculty of Medicine, University of
the Ryukyu, Okinawa, Japan), Akiko Obara (Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto
University, Kyoto, Japan), Motoaki Ozaki (Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki
Hospital, Hyogo, Japan), Tsugio Yanagihashi (National Sanatorium
Tohoku-shinseien, Miyagi, Japan), Abraham T. Agdamag (Dr. Jose
Rodrigues Memorial Hospital, Manila, Philippines), Indropo Agusni (Dr.
Soetomo General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University,
Surabesi, Indonesia), Mohamed Ali Abassi (KMC Leprosy Hospital,
Karachi, Pakistan), Mohammad Zubair Khan (Lady Reading Hospital,
Peshawar, Pakistan), and Akira Kobayashi (Peshawar-Kai Hospital,
Peshawar, Pakistan) for supplying clinical samples.
This work was supported by a Health Research Grant of Research on
Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, Ministry of Health,
Labour and Welfare, Government of Japan, and partly by a grant for
Research on International Collaboration in Medicine of International
Medical Center, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Also, this work
was partly supported by the U.S.-Japan Cooperative Medical Science Program.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Leprosy Research
Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, 4-2-1 Aoba-cho, Higashimurayama-shi, Tokyo 189-0002, Japan. Phone: 81-42-391-8211. Fax:
81-42-394-9092. E-mail: matsuoka{at}nih.go.jp.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Cambau, E.,
E. Perani,
I. Guillemin,
P. Jamet, and B. Ji.
1997.
Multidrug-resistance to dapsone, rifampicin, and ofloxacin in Mycobacterium leprae.
Lancet
349:103-104[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
de Wit, M. Y.,
W. R. Faber,
S. R. Krieg,
J. T. Douglas,
S. B. Lucas,
N. Montreewasuwat,
S. R. Pattyn,
R. Hussain,
J. M. Ponnighaus,
R. A. Hartskeerl, and P. R. Klatser.
1991.
Application of a polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Mycobacterium leprae in skin tissues.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:906-910[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Dhandayuthapani, S.,
M. J. Banu, and Y. Kashiwabara.
1994.
Cloning and sequence determination of the gene coding for the elongation factor Tu of Mycobacterium leprae.
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
115:664-669[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Honore, N., and S. T. Cole.
1993.
Molecular basis of rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium leprae.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
37:414-418[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Jacobson, R. R., and R. C. Hastings.
1976.
Rifampin-resistant leprosy.
Lancet
ii:1304-1305.
|
| 6.
|
Jamal, M. A.,
S. Maeda,
N. Nakata,
M. Kai,
K. Fukuchi, and Y. Kashiwabara.
2000.
Molecular basis of clarithromycin-resistance in Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex.
Tuber. Lung Dis.
80:1-4[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Ji, B.,
E. G. Perani,
C. Petinom, and J. H. Grosset.
1996.
Bactericidal activities of combinations of new drugs against Mycobacterium leprae in nude mice.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
40:393-399[Abstract].
|
| 8.
|
Jin, D. J., and C. A. Gross.
1988.
Mapping and sequencing of mutations in the Escherichia coli rpoB gene that lead to rifampicin resistance.
J. Mol. Biol.
202:45-58[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Kai, M.,
M. Matsuoka,
N. Nakata,
S. Maeda,
M. Gidoh,
Y. Maeda,
K. Hashimoto,
K. Kobayashi, and Y. Kashiwabara.
1999.
Diaminodiphenylsulfone resistance of Mycobacterium leprae due to mutations in the dihydropteroate synthase gene.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
177:231-235[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Matsuoka, M.,
Y. Kashiwabara, and M. Namisato.
2001.
A Mycobacterium leprae isolate resistant to dapsone, rifampin, ofloxacin and sparfloxacin.
Int. J. Lepr. Other Mycobact. Dis.
68:452-455.
|
| 11.
|
Musser, J. M.
1995.
Antimicrobial agent resistance in mycobacteria: molecular insights.
Clin. Mol. Microbiol. Rev.
8:496-514.
|
| 12.
|
Pettit, J. H. S., and R. J. W. Rees.
1964.
Sulphone resistance in leprosy. An experimental and clinical study.
Lancet
ii:673-674.
|
| 13.
|
Ramaswamy, S., and J. M. Musser.
1998.
Molecular genetic basis of antimicrobial agent resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Tuber. Lung Dis.
79:3-29[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Shepard, C. C.
1967.
A kinetic method for the study of drugs against Mycobacterium leprae in mice.
Int. J. Lepr. Other Mycobact. Dis.
35:429-435.
|
| 15.
|
Takiff, H. E.,
L. Salazar,
C. Guerrero,
W. Philipp,
W. M. Huang,
B. Kreiswirth,
S. T. Cole,
W. R. Jacobs, Jr., and A. Telenti.
1994.
Cloning and nucleotide sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis gyrA and gyrB genes and detection of quinolone resistance mutations.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38:773-780[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Telenti, A.,
P. Imboden,
F. Marchesi,
D. Lowrie,
S. Cole,
M. J. Colston,
L. Matter,
K. Schopher, and T. Bodmer.
1993.
Detection of rifampicin-resistance mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Lancet
341:647-650[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Williams, D. L.,
L. Spring,
E. Harris,
P. Roche, and T. P. Gillis.
2000.
Dihydropteroate synthase of Mycobacterium leprae and dapsone resistance.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
44:1530-1537[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Williams, D. L.,
C. Waguespack,
K. Eisenach,
J. T. Crawford,
F. Postaels,
M. Salfinger,
C. Nolan,
C. Abe,
V. Sticht-Groh, and T. P. Gillis.
1994.
Characterization of rifampin resistance in pathogenic mycobacteria.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38:2380-2386[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
World Health Organization.
2000.
Leprosy global situation.
Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec.
75:226-231[Medline].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2001, p. 3635-3639, Vol. 45, No. 12
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.12.3635-3639.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Matrat, S., Cambau, E., Jarlier, V., Aubry, A.
(2008). Are All the DNA Gyrase Mutations Found in Mycobacterium leprae Clinical Strains Involved in Resistance to Fluoroquinolones?. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 745-747
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sapkota, B. R., Ranjit, C., Neupane, K. D., Macdonald, M.
(2008). Development and evaluation of a novel multiple-primer PCR amplification refractory mutation system for the rapid detection of mutations conferring rifampicin resistance in codon 425 of the rpoB gene of Mycobacterium leprae. J Med Microbiol
57: 179-184
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Duthie, M. S., Reece, S. T., Lahiri, R., Goto, W., Raman, V. S., Kaplan, J., Ireton, G. C., Bertholet, S., Gillis, T. P., Krahenbuhl, J. L., Reed, S. G.
(2007). Antigen-Specific Cellular and Humoral Responses Are Induced by Intradermal Mycobacterium leprae Infection of the Mouse Ear. Infect. Immun.
75: 5290-5297
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Makino, M., Maeda, Y., Inagaki, K.
(2006). Immunostimulatory Activity of Recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG That Secretes Major Membrane Protein II of Mycobacterium leprae.. Infect. Immun.
74: 6264-6271
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Scollard, D. M., Adams, L. B., Gillis, T. P., Krahenbuhl, J. L., Truman, R. W., Williams, D. L.
(2006). The Continuing Challenges of Leprosy. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
19: 338-381
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wada, T., Maeda, S., Tamaru, A., Imai, S., Hase, A., Kobayashi, K.
(2004). Dual-Probe Assay for Rapid Detection of Drug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Real-Time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 5277-5285
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Maeda, Y., Makino, M., Crick, D. C., Mahapatra, S., Srisungnam, S., Takii, T., Kashiwabara, Y., Brennan, P. J.
(2002). Novel 33-Kilodalton Lipoprotein from Mycobacterium leprae. Infect. Immun.
70: 4106-4111
[Abstract]
[Full Text]