![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2001, p. 3669-3671, Vol. 45, No. 12
Research Center in Infectious Diseases of the
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec and Department of
Medical Biology1 and Bone Marrow
Transplant Unit, St.-Sacrement Hospital and Department of
Medicine,3 Université Laval, and
Department of Microbiology4 and
Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, and
Department of Medicine,2 Université de
Montréal, Québec, Canada
Received 23 April 2001/Returned for modification 2 August
2001/Accepted 27 August 2001
Fifty allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients were enrolled in a
prospective cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia-guided preemptive therapy
trial. Among these, 10 of 34 patients who received ganciclovir exhibited sustained and/or recurrent antigenemia despite treatment. Thirteen leukocyte preparations from these 10 subjects were screened for the presence of the most frequent cytomegalovirus UL97 mutations conferring ganciclovir resistance. None of these mutations were detected after mean and median ganciclovir exposures of 31.6 and 28.0 days, respectively.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections
represent a serious threat in patients undergoing allogeneic bone
marrow transplantation (BMT) or peripheral blood stem cell
transplantation (PBSCT) (15). In order to reduce the
morbidity and mortality associated with CMV disease, most centers have
now adopted one of the two following preventive strategies. The first
approach, referred to as universal prophylaxis, is based on the
administration of a potent anti-CMV drug, usually ganciclovir (GCV), to
all patients for the first 3 months after transplantation. Prophylaxis
with GCV has been reported to be highly effective in reducing the
occurrence of early CMV disease (prior to day +100) but is also
associated with an increased incidence of bacterial and fungal
infections and with significant bone marrow toxicity (4,
13). Long-term use of GCV has raised concerns about the
development of delayed CMV disease and the possibility of selecting
GCV-resistant strains (11, 25). The second strategy,
called preemptive or early treatment, is based on early identification
of patients with active CMV blood infections using sensitive detection
assays followed by antiviral treatment for various lengths of time.
A successful CMV pp65 antigenemia-guided preemptive strategy for
allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients was recently reported
(5). In that study, 50 patients with hematologic
malignancies received a transplant (not T cell depleted) from matched
sibling donors. The subjects were monitored weekly for the presence of CMV antigens and DNA (COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR test; Roche
Diagnostics, Laval, Canada) in polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNL) from
initiation of the conditioning regimen until day +98 after
transplantation. Among these 50 patients, 34 (68%) were treated with
GCV (14 days of intravenous [i.v.] administration [5 mg/kg of body
weight twice a day] followed by 14 days of oral administration [1,000
mg three times a day]) upon a positive pp65 antigenemia assay. Eight
(23.5%) of these 34 patients received a second course of therapy based on the reemergence of CMV pp65 antigens in the blood. Only one patient
(2%) enrolled in the study developed CMV disease despite a negative
antigenemia test. To further support the use of such a preventive
approach, we now report the results of genotypic markers of CMV
resistance to GCV among the same cohort of patients.
Among samples from the 50 patients enrolled in our study, 13 from 10 patients were selected for genotypic analysis on the basis of either a
positive PCR for CMV in PMNL after the patient had received at least 14 days of i.v. GCV during the first treatment course (5 samples) or a
second positive test for CMV DNA in the blood within the first
98 days following transplantation (8 samples). In both cases, the last
PCR-positive samples were examined for genotypic evidence of
resistance. The subjects who had no positive PCR throughout the study
or whose CMV DNA rapidly cleared within 14 days of the first GCV
treatment were assumed not to be infected with a GCV-resistant virus.
The samples were collected either after or during GCV therapy (mean,
31.6 days; median, 28.0 days; range, 14 to 56 days of cumulative GCV
therapy). The mean viral DNA load as determined by the COBAS AMPLICOR
CMV MONITOR test for those samples was 9.96 × 103 CMV
DNA copies per 4 × 106 PMNL. The presence of various
CMV UL97 mutations at codons 460, 520, 594, and 595 was assessed as
previously described (12, 14). Briefly, two regions
(nucleotides 1088 to 1587 and 1713 to 1830) of the CMV UL97 gene were
amplified using a nested-PCR protocol. Amplicons were then digested
separately with enzymes NlaIII and AluI (500-bp
amplicon) as well as with HhaI, TaqI, and
MseI (118-bp amplicon). Restriction patterns were then
visualized on an 8% polyacrylamide gel stained with ethidium bromide.
Two samples from the same patient (collected after 28 and 35 days of
cumulative GCV therapy) had a restriction pattern almost compatible
with a Q520 mutation (Table 1). Upon
sequencing, this specific restriction pattern was found to be caused by
the presence of an Asn510Ser mutation, with a wild-type sequence at
codon 520. All the other samples contained no CMV UL97 mutations at
codons 460, 520, 594, and 595 by the restriction enzyme assay.
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.12.3669-3671.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Lack of Emergence of Cytomegalovirus UL97 Mutations
Conferring Ganciclovir (GCV) Resistance following Preemptive GCV
Therapy in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
TABLE 1.
CMV load and UL97 mutations in leukocytes of allogeneic
blood transplant recipients with persistent or recurrent
antigenemia despite GCV preemptive therapy
Over the past few years, some concerns have been raised regarding the selection of drug-resistant CMV strains in profoundly immunosuppressed transplant recipients. Indeed, the presence of such strains has been documented for solid organ transplant recipients (1-3, 17, 19-21, 26, 29) and BMT or PBSCT recipients (8, 9, 11, 16, 23-25, 27), although the exact frequency at which GCV resistance develops in those patients is not yet known. In theory, the use of a preemptive strategy which greatly reduces drug exposure (compared to the use of universal prophylaxis) should both decrease the incidence of drug resistance and limit antiviral-related toxicities in those patients. In addition, such an approach should also contribute to reduction of the rate of delayed CMV disease as a result of early reconstitution of a CMV-specific cellular immune response (18).
In our study, viral resistance to GCV was assessed by examining the presence of the most common UL97 mutations associated with GCV resistance directly in leukocytes of PBSCT recipients who had persistent CMV antigens or DNA in their blood after a minimum of 2 weeks of i.v. GCV or during a second viremic episode. Previous results from our group indicate that such a genotype-based screening assay is more sensitive than phenotypic (susceptibility) analyses in evaluating GCV resistance in human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals (12). This technique also offers the advantage of detecting minor UL97 mutant subpopulations (at least 10%) mixed with wild-type strains (7) with an absolute sensitivity of 25 copies, as determined by testing for a plasmid containing the UL97 gene. The only UL97 mutation (S510) detected in our study has been previously reported to occur in susceptible CMV isolates (11) and is therefore not considered to be associated with GCV resistance. Thus, no UL97 mutations known to confer GCV resistance were identified in the 50 patients enrolled in our study (95% confidence interval, 0 to 6%). Although only 13 samples from 10 patients were tested, it could reasonably be assumed that the other patients did not harbor GCV-resistant strains in their blood since they consistently had negative PCR results or rapidly became PCR negative (within 2 weeks of therapy) and did not exhibit recurrent CMV DNA in their blood. These results suggest that the rate of emergence of viral resistance in the context of short courses of preemptive GCV therapy in allogeneic PBSCT recipients is very low. In the study by Erice et al. (11), all UL97 mutations conferring GCV resistance in blood isolates of BMT patients emerged after more than 2 months of cumulative GCV therapy preceded by acyclovir prophylaxis. In contrast, the length of drug exposure was significantly shorter in our patients (mean GCV exposure, 31.6 days; range, 14 to 56 days).
It is still possible that some other UL97 or UL54 (DNA polymerase) mutations conferring resistance to GCV were not detected by our screening assay. For example, UL97 mutations at codons 591 and 603 have been previously reported after BMT (9, 23). However, given the facts that UL97 mutations at codons 460, 520, 594, and 595 represent approximately 70% of UL97 mutations associated with GCV resistance (10) and that UL54 resistance mutations usually emerge after UL97 mutations (28), the probability of having missed a significant number of GCV resistance markers remains very low. These results are in agreement with the lack of selection of GCV-resistant CMV strains as assessed by phenotypic analyses of solid organ transplant recipients with CMV viremia who received brief courses of i.v. GCV (6) and of PBSCT recipients with rising CMV antigenemia while on preemptive GCV therapy (22). In addition, none of our patients developed clinical features suggestive of GCV resistance, such as the need for foscarnet therapy or the development of late CMV disease (19).
In conclusion, the absence of the most frequent genotypic markers for GCV resistance in this study, combined with the low incidence of CMV disease as previously reported (5), strengthens the safety and reliability of our preemptive GCV approach for PBSCT recipients.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: CHUQ-CHUL, Room RC-709, 2705 Blvd. Laurier, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada G1V 4G2. Phone: (418) 654-2705. Fax: (418) 654-2715. E-mail: Guy.Boivin{at}crchul.ulaval.ca.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
Top
Abstract
Text
References
|
|---|
| 1. | Alain, S., P. Honderlick, D. Grenet, M. Stern, C. Vadam, M. J. Sanson-Le Pors, and M. C. Mazeron. 1997. Failure of ganciclovir treatment associated with selection of a ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus strain in a lung transplant recipient. Transplantation 63:1533-1536[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. | Baldanti, F., L. Simoncini, A. Sarasini, M. Zavattoni, P. Grossi, M. G. Revello, and G. Gerna. 1998. Ganciclovir resistance as a result of oral ganciclovir in a heart transplant recipient with multiple human cytomegalovirus strains in blood. Transplantation 66:324-329[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. | Bienvenu, B., E. Thervet, J. Bedrossian, C. Scieux, M. C. Mazeron, D. Thouvenot, and C. Legendre. 2000. Development of cytomegalovirus resistance to ganciclovir after oral maintenance treatment in a renal transplant recipient. Transplantation 69:182-184[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. |
Boeckh, M.,
T. A. Gooley,
D. Myerson,
T. Cunningham,
G. Schoch, and R. A. Bowden.
1996.
Cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia-guided early treatment with ganciclovir versus ganciclovir at engraftment after allogeneic marrow transplantation: a randomized double-blind study.
Blood
88:4063-4071 |
| 5. |
Boivin, G.,
R. Bélanger,
R. Delage,
C. Béliveau,
C. Demers,
N. Goyette, and J. Roy.
2000.
Quantitative analysis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia using the pp65 antigenemia assay and the COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR PCR test after blood and marrow allogeneic transplantation.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:4356-4360 |
| 6. | Boivin, G., A. Erice, D. D. Crane, D. L. Dunn, and H. H. J. Balfour. 1993. Ganciclovir susceptibilities of cytomegalovirus (CMV) isolates from solid organ transplant recipients with CMV viremia after antiviral prophylaxis. J. Infect. Dis. 168:332-335[Medline]. |
| 7. | Chou, S., A. Erice, M. C. Jordan, G. M. Vercellotti, K. R. Michels, C. L. Talarico, S. C. Stanat, and K. K. Biron. 1995. Analysis of the UL97 phosphotransferase coding sequence in clinical cytomegalovirus isolates and identification of mutations conferring ganciclovir resistance. J. Infect. Dis. 171:576-583[Medline]. |
| 8. | Drobyski, W. R., K. K. Knox, D. R. Carrigan, and R. C. Ash. 1991. Foscarnet therapy of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus in marrow transplantation. Transplantation 52:155-157[Medline]. |
| 9. |
Eckle, T.,
L. Prix,
G. Jahn,
T. Klingebiel,
R. Handgretinger,
B. Selle, and K. Hamprecht.
2000.
Drug-resistant human cytomegalovirus infection in children after allogeneic stem cell transplantation may have different clinical outcomes.
Blood
96:3286-3289 |
| 10. |
Erice, A.
1999.
Resistance of human cytomegalovirus to antiviral drugs.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
12:286-297 |
| 11. | Erice, A., N. Borrell, W. Li, W. J. Miller, and H. H. J. Balfour. 1998. Ganciclovir susceptibilities and analysis of UL97 region in cytomegalovirus (CMV) isolates from bone marrow recipients with CMV disease after antiviral prophylaxis. J. Infect. Dis. 178:531-534[Medline]. |
| 12. | Gilbert, C., J. Handfield, E. Toma, R. Lalonde, M. G. Bergeron, and G. Boivin. 1998. Emergence and prevalence of cytomegalovirus UL97 mutations associated with ganciclovir resistance in AIDS patients. AIDS 12:125-129[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. |
Goodrich, J. M.,
R. A. Bowden,
L. Fisher,
C. Keller,
G. Schoch, and J. D. Meyers.
1993.
Ganciclovir prophylaxis to prevent cytomegalovirus disease after allogeneic marrow transplant.
Ann. Intern. Med.
118:173-178 |
| 14. | Hanson, M. N., L. C. Preheim, S. Chou, C. L. Talarico, K. K. Biron, and A. Erice. 1995. Novel mutation in the UL97 gene of a clinical cytomegalovirus strain conferring resistance to ganciclovir. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:1204-1205[Abstract]. |
| 15. | Hebart, H., L. Kanz, G. Jahn, and H. Einsele. 1998. Management of cytomegalovirus infection after solid-organ or stem-cell transplantation. Current guidelines and future prospects. Drugs 55:59-72[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 16. | Knox, K. K., W. R. Drobyski, and D. R. Carrigan. 1991. Cytomegalovirus isolate resistant to ganciclovir and foscarnet from a marrow transplant patient. Lancet 337:1292-1293[Medline]. |
| 17. | Kruger, R. M., W. D. Shannon, M. Q. Arens, J. P. Lynch, G. A. Storch, and E. P. Trulock. 1999. The impact of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus infection after lung transplantation. Transplantation 68:1272-1279[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. |
Li, C. R.,
P. D. Greenberg,
M. J. Gilbert,
J. M. Goodrich, and S. R. Riddell.
1994.
Recovery of HLA-restricted cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T-cell responses after allogeneic bone marrow transplant: correlation with CMV disease and effect of ganciclovir prophylaxis.
Blood
83:1971-1979 |
| 19. | Limaye, A. P., L. Corey, D. M. Koelle, C. L. Davis, and M. Boeckh. 2000. Emergence of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus disease among recipients of solid-organ transplants. Lancet 356:645-649[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. | Lurain, N. S., H. C. Ammons, K. S. Kapell, V. V. Yeldandi, E. R. Garrity, and J. P. O'Keefe. 1996. Molecular analysis of human cytomegalovirus strains from two lung transplant recipients with the same donor. Transplantation 62:497-502[Medline]. |
| 21. | Mendez, J. C., I. G. Sia, K. R. Tau, M. J. Espy, T. F. Smith, S. Chou, and C. V. Paya. 1999. Novel mutation in the CMV UL97 gene associated with resistance to ganciclovir therapy. Transplantation 67:755-757[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. |
Nichols, W. G.,
L. Corey,
T. Gooley,
W. L. Drew,
R. Miner,
M. Huang,
C. Davis, and M. Boeckh.
2001.
Rising pp65 antigenemia during preemptive anticytomegalovirus therapy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: risk factors, correlation with DNA load, and outcomes.
Blood
97:867-874 |
| 23. | Prix, L., K. Hamprecht, B. Holzhuter, R. Handgretinger, T. Klingebiel, and G. Jahn. 1999. Comprehensive restriction analysis of the UL97 region allows early detection of ganciclovir-resistant human cytomegalovirus in an immunocompromised child. J. Infect. Dis. 180:491-495[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 24. | Razis, E., P. Cook, A. Mittelman, and T. Ahmed. 1994. Treatment of gancyclovir resistant cytomegalovirus with foscarnet: a report of two cases occurring after bone marrow transplantation. Leuk. Lymphoma 12:477-480[Medline]. |
| 25. | Reusser, P., C. Cordonnier, H. Einsele, D. Engelhard, D. Link, A. Locasciulli, and P. Ljungman. 1996. European survey of herpesvirus resistance to antiviral drugs in bone marrow transplant recipients. Infectious Diseases Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Bone Marrow Transplant. 17:813-817[Medline]. |
| 26. | Rosen, H. R., K. G. Benner, K. D. Flora, J. M. Rabkin, S. L. Orloff, A. Olyaei, and S. Chou. 1997. Development of ganciclovir resistance during treatment of primary cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation. Transplantation 63:476-478[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 27. |
Slavin, M. A.,
R. R. Bindra,
C. A. Gleaves,
M. B. Pettinger, and R. A. Bowden.
1993.
Ganciclovir sensitivity of cytomegalovirus at diagnosis and during treatment of cytomegalovirus pneumonia in marrow transplant recipients.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
37:1360-1363 |
| 28. | Smith, I. L., J. M. Cherrington, R. E. Jiles, M. D. Fuller, W. R. Freeman, and S. A. Spector. 1997. High-level resistance of cytomegalovirus to ganciclovir is associated with alterations in both the UL97 and DNA polymerase genes. J. Infect. Dis. 176:69-77[Medline]. |
| 29. | Tatarowicz, W. A., N. S. Lurain, and K. D. Thompson. 1992. A ganciclovir-resistant clinical isolate of human cytomegalovirus exhibiting cross-resistance to other DNA polymerase inhibitors. J. Infect. Dis. 166:904-907[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
