This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Akins, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rybak, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Akins, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rybak, M. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 2001, p. 454-459, Vol. 45, No. 2
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.2.454-459.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Bactericidal Activities of Two Daptomycin Regimens against Clinical Strains of Glycopeptide Intermediate-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium, and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model with Simulated Endocardial Vegetations

Ronda L. Akins1,2,dagger and Michael J. Rybak1,2,3,*

The Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Services, Detroit Receiving Hospital and University Health Center,1 and the College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Professions2 and School of Medicine,3 Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201

Received 31 May 2000/Returned for modification 11 August 2000/Accepted 1 November 2000


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Daptomycin is an investigational lipopeptide antibiotic active against gram-positive organisms. The mechanism of action is unique, resulting in interference with cell membrane transport. The bactericidal activity of daptomycin was evaluated against glycopeptide-intermediate susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (GISA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF), and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in an in vitro infection model with simulated endocardial vegetations. Simulated regimens of daptomycin at 6 mg/kg/day (D6) and 10 mg/kg/day (D10) were utilized. MICs and MBCs for daptomycin were determined in the absence and in the presence of albumin with the following results (MIC/MBC): for GISA-992, 0.5/1.0 and 16/16; for VREF-590, 2.0/2.0 and 32/32; and for MRSA-494, 0.25/0.25 and 1.0/4.0 µg/ml, respectively. During the first 8 h daptomycin significantly reduced the inoculum for all organisms. Daptomycin at 6 mg/kg/day and 10 mg/kg/day had log10 CFU/g reductions of 5 and 6, 3.4 and 5, and 6.4 and 6.5 by 8 h for GISA-992, VREF-590, and MRSA-494, respectively. Against both GISA-992 and VREF-590, the D10 regimen achieved the limit of detection at 72 h, with D6 regimens showing slight regrowth. A concentration-dependent killing effect was noted to occur, with daptomycin demonstrating a more rapid and greater kill from the D10 versus the D6 regimen. The results of this study suggest that daptomycin demonstrates significant (P < 0.05) activity against gram-positive organisms in a simulated sequestered infection site.


    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The members of multidrug-resistant enterococcal and staphylococcal infections, as well as of all other gram-positive infections, have been increasing at an alarming rate. The incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), first reported in the United States in the 1960s, has led to a significant increase in the use of vancomycin over the last 40 years. Inappropriate use of antibiotics, including vancomycin, has led to the development of resistant organisms, with the appearance of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and glycopeptide intermediate-sensitive S. aureus (GISA) (2, 9, 18). From 1989 to 1998, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that the number of VRE nosocomial infections increased from 0.3 to 21.2% and from 0.4 to 22.6% in nonintensive and intensive care units, respectively (5).

Since the appearance of vancomycin resistance among clinical isolates of enterococci, concern has been raised about the potential for transfer of the resistance genes to highly virulent strains of MRSA (16). However, the mechanism of vancomycin resistance in laboratory-derived glycopeptide-resistant S. aureus isolates is distinct from the mechanism found in enterococci (12).

The eight documented strains of S. aureus with reduced susceptibilities to vancomycin in vivo are MRSA strains which have developed decreased susceptibility with prolonged exposure to vancomycin (17). This potential emergence of new strains of GISA and the problematic treatments available for VRE increases the need for new therapeutic options.

One potential hopeful for the treatment of VRE and GISA is daptomycin, a novel lipopeptide antibiotic. Like vancomycin, it has broad activity against gram positives bacteria, but it has a different mechanism of action that results in interference with cell membrane transport. This drug was first investigated as an alternative to vancomycin in the late 1980s. Daptomycin was found to be efficacious in skin and soft tissue infections and bacteremia, but studies with daptomycin in endocarditis were stopped due to less-than-desired outcomes with earlier designed low-dose regimens of 2 mg/kg every 24 h (q24h) and 3 mg/kg q12h. In light of the increasing need for alternative treatments against resistant gram-positive bacteria, there is a renewed interest in daptomycin.

Therefore, we decided to evaluate two higher-dosing regimens of daptomycin, i.e., dosed once daily at a current newly designed dose of 6 mg/kg or a potential new regimen of 10 mg/kg versus vancomycin against three clinical strains, one each of GISA, VRE, and MRSA.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Bacterial strains. The three strains evaluated were GISA-992 (New Jersey strain, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Ga.), VREF-590 (isolated from a patient with bacteremia), and MRSA-494 (isolated from a patient with endocarditis).

Antibiotics. Daptomycin analytical powder (lot 44BY0; Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, Mass.) was used. Vancomycin used was commercially purchased (lot 1NJ03M; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.).

Medium. All in vitro-simulated endocardial vegetation (SEV) models, except the daptomycin models, utilized Mueller-Hinton broth (Difco, Detroit, Mich.) supplemented with 25 mg of calcium and 12.5 mg of magnesium per liter (SMHB). Due to the dependency on calcium for activity, all daptomycin models utilized Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with 75 mg of calcium and 12.5 mg of magnesium per liter (6, 10). Colony counts were determined using tryptic soy agar (TSA; Difco) plates.

Susceptibility testing. The MICs and MBCs of the antibiotics were determined by broth microdilution in SMHB according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines (13). Daptomycin MICs and MBCs were determined in supplemented broth as described above. Daptomycin MICs and MBCs were also determined in the presence of 4 g of human albumin (American Red Cross, Detroit, Mich.) per dl. Five-microliter samples from clear wells were plated onto TSA plates for the determination of MBCs, and all samples were incubated at 35°C for 24 h.

KC experiments. To determine the effect of the protein content of the SEV on daptomycin's bactericidal activity, a series of killing curve (KC) experiments were performed using GISA-992 as the test strain due to our previous experience with daptomycin's activity against this strain (1). The following conditions were compared: daptomycin simulated total concentration of 80 µg/ml in broth alone, broth plus 4 g of albumin per dl, broth and organisms embedded in an SEV, and broth with albumin and organisms embedded in an SEV. Briefly, three to five colonies from an overnight growth on TSA plates incubated at 35°C were added to normal saline and adjusted as necessary to produce a 2.0 McFarland standard suspension of organisms. This suspension was diluted appropriately with SMHB to achieve a final inoculum of 109 CFU/ml for killing curves without SEVs. For KC experiments with SEVs, the SEVs were prepared as described below and placed in test tubes containing SMHB. A stock solution of daptomycin at the concentrations listed above was then added to all KCs (with or without SEVs), and the test tubes were incubated at 35°C with constant shaking for 24 h. Samples of broth (0.1 ml) or SEVs were removed at 0, 8, and 24 h, homogenized (for SEVs) and diluted appropriately with cold 0.9% sodium chloride to avoid antibiotic carryover, plated onto TSA plates, and incubated for 24 h at 35°C. Growth controls without antibiotic were run in parallel to the antibiotic-containing test tubes. The limit of detection with this method is 2.0 log10 CFU/ml. All time-kill curve experiments were performed in duplicate.

Simulated vegetations. Organism stocks were prepared by inoculating 5-ml test tubes of Mueller-Hinton broth with colonies harvested from fresh overnight growth on TSA. Test tubes were then incubated for 24 h on a rotator at 37°C. Test tubes were then centrifuged for 15 min at 3,500 × g, and the supernatant was removed. The remaining pellet of the organism was collected and resuspended to achieve a concentration of 1010 CFU/ml. Simulated vegetations were prepared by mixing 0.1 ml of organism suspension (final inoculum, 109 CFU/0.5 g), 0.4 ml of human cryoprecipitate from volunteer donors (American Red Cross), and 0.025 ml of platelet suspension (platelets mixed with normal saline, 250,000 to 500,000 platelets per clot in 1.5-ml siliconized Eppendorf tubes). Bovine thrombin (5,000 U/ml) at 0.05 ml was added to each tube after insertion of a sterile monofilament line into the mixture. The resultant simulated vegetations were then removed from the Eppendorf tubes with a sterile 21-gauge needle.

In vitro pharmacodynamic infection model. An in vitro infection model consisting of a 250-ml one-compartment glass apparatus with sample ports incorporated, in which the SEVs were suspended and sealed with a rubber stopper, was utilized (9). The apparatus was prefilled with SMHB, and antibiotics were administered as boluses over a 72-h period into the central compartment via an injection port. The model apparatus was placed in a 37°C water bath throughout the procedure, and a magnetic stir bar was placed in the medium for thorough mixing of the drug in the model. Fresh medium (SMHB) was continuously supplied and removed from the compartment along with the drug via a peristaltic pump (Masterflex; Cole-Parmer Instrument Co., Chicago, Ill.) set to simulate the half-lives of the antibiotics. The pH was monitored throughout all experiments with daptomycin due to the possible effects on its activity (10). Daptomycin has been demonstrated to be approximately 93% protein bound (6, 11, 14; G. L. Brier, J. D. Wolny, H. R. Black. Abstr. 29th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. 1347, 1989). Since we determined that the SEVs contain an average total protein level of 6.8 to 7.4 g/dl and 3.0 to 3.5 g of albumin per dl (similar to human serum) and since the results of our KC experiments indicated that protein affected daptomycin's bactericidal activity but there were no differences between daptomycin's killing activity in broth plus albumin, broth plus SEVs, or broth plus albumin and SEVs (see Results), we therefore simulated total daptomycin concentrations in the in vitro model. Daptomycin was given at two dosages of 6 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg q24h for estimated human total Cmax/Cmin (maximum concentration of drug in serum/minimum concentration of drug in serum) levels of 80/10 and 130/16 µg/ml, respectively (Investigator Brochure [11 15 June 2000]). The pump rate was set at 0.4 ml/min to achieve an average half-life of 8 h. Vancomycin was administered to simulate 1 g q12h for a Cmax of 30 to 35 µg/ml and a Cmin of 5 to 10 µg/ml. The pump rate was set at 0.5 ml/min to achieve a half-life of 6 h. All infection model experiments were performed in duplicate to ensure reproducibility. In addition, models in the absence of antibiotics were performed over 72 h to assure adequate viability of the organisms in the model.

Pharmacodynamic analysis. Three SEVs were removed from each model (total of six) at 0, 8, 24, 32, 48, and 72 h. The SEVs were homogenized and diluted in cold saline, and 20 µl in triplicate was plated onto TSA plates. Plates were then incubated at 35°C for 24 h, at which time colony counts were performed. The total reduction in log10 CFU/g over 72 h was determined by plotting time-kill curves based on the number of remaining organisms over the 72-h time period. The time to achieve a 99.9% bacterial load reduction was determined by linear regression (if r2 >=  0.9) or by visual inspection. Cmax to MIC ratios (Cmax/MIC), time above the MIC for 24 h (T > MIC24 h), and the area under the concentration time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24)/MIC ratio were determined for the different dosing regimens of daptomycin and vancomycin.

Pharmacokinetic analysis. Samples were obtained from broth (0.5 ml from each infection model), through the injection port, at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 32, 48, and 72 h for the determination of antibiotic concentrations. Samples were also taken from the SEVs obtained at 0, 8, 24, 32, 48, and 72 h for the determination of antibiotic concentrations within the SEV. Samples were stored at -70°C until ready for analysis. Vancomycin concentrations were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (Abbott Diagnostics TDx). This assay has a limit of detection for vancomycin of 2.0 µg/ml with a percent coefficient of variation (CV) of <= 6%. The concentrations of daptomycin were determined by microbioassay utilizing Micrococcus luteus ATCC 9341. The SEV concentrations of daptomycin and vancomycin were also determined via microbioassay using the same indicator organism. Vancomycin concentrations in SEVs were determined by bioassay because the viscosity of the samples interfered with the fluorescence polarization assay. We have previously found these two assay techniques to be comparable (15). Briefly, blank 0.25-in. disks were spotted with 20 µl of the standards in broth or samples. Each standard was tested in triplicate by placing the disk on antibiotic assay medium 1 agar plates, which were preswabbed with a 0.5 McFarland suspension of the test organism. Plates were incubated for 18 to 24 h at 37°C, at which time the zone sizes were measured. Concentrations of 150, 100, and 10 µg/ml (1.25 µg/ml, lower limit of detection) were used as standards with an interday percent coefficient of variation (CV%) of <= 10%. Standards for the above assays were prepared in broth and in broth plus cryoprecipitate to correct for protein content. The antibiotic peak/trough values and half-lives were calculated from plots of the concentration-versus time plots. AUC, elimination half-lives, and Cmax/Cmin were determined by trapezoidal methods utilizing PKAnalyst (Micromath, Salt Lake City, Utah).

Resistance. The 100-µl samples from each time point were plated directly onto TSA plates containing four- and eightfold the MIC of the respective antibiotic to assess the development of resistance. Plates were then examined for growth after 48 h of incubation at 35°C. Development of resistance was evaluated at the 24-, 32-, 48-, and 72-h time points. Any growth of organisms observed on the antibiotic-containing resistance plates after 48 h of incubation would be considered to be resistant. If resistance developed, further MIC and MBC testing on any of these organisms was performed to determine the level of resistance.

Statistical analysis. Changes in the CFU per gram level at 48 and 72 h were compared by two-way analysis of variance with Tukey's Post-Hoc test. A P value of <= 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistical Software (release 6.1.3; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Ill.).


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Susceptibility testing. Microdilution MICs and MBCs of daptomycin with or without albumin and vancomycin for GISA-992, VREF-590, and MRSA-494 are listed in Table 1. KC results are displayed in Fig. 1. There were no noted differences in KC experiments in which daptomycin total concentrations were simulated in the presence of broth plus albumin, broth plus SEVs, or broth plus albumin and SEVs.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Susceptibility data for isolates tested



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   KC test tube experiments. Daptomycin simulated total concentrations of 80 µg/ml in broth (diamond ), in broth and albumin (), in broth with SEV (), and in broth with SEV and albumin (black-lozenge ) are indicated. Corresponding growth controls of these conditions are indicated by contrasting symbols (filled versus unfilled and unfilled versus filled).

Pharmacokinetics. The pharmacokinetic parameters for daptomycin and vancomycin are listed in Table 2. The concentrations in the SEVs were similar to the levels obtained in the broth for daptomycin; however, vancomycin SEV concentrations were much lower than the concentration in broth.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   Summary of pharmacokinetic data

Pharmacodynamics. Pharmacodynamic results (changes in the log CFU/gram values over 72 h) are displayed in Table 3 and are graphically depicted in Fig. 2. Against GISA-992 daptomycin resulted in a 99.9% kill by 8 h for both regimens with 5- and 6-log10 CFU/g decreases for daptomycin at 6 mg/kg q24h (D6) and 10 mg/kg q24h (D10), respectively. The D10 regimen remained at the limit of detection throughout the 72 h, while with D6 slight regrowth was observed after 24 h. Against VREF-590 daptomycin resulted in time to 99.9% kill by 8 h for both regimens with 3.4- and 5-log10 CFU/g decreases in bacterial inocula, respectively. Concentration-dependent killing was observed with D10 achieving a 1.7-log greater kill than D6 at 8 h. At 72 hours D10 killed to detection limits, while some regrowth was noted for D6. For MRSA-494 daptomycin produced similar effects with an approximately 6.5-log10 CFU/g decrease in the inocula by 8 h for both regimens. As expected, vancomycin produced minimal killing during the first 24 h, with static activity during the remainder of the experimental period. Residual inoculum for the three organisms at 72 h is listed in Table 3.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3.   Residual bacterial inoculum remaining after 72 h in the in vitro infection models



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   In vitro model results with three multidrug-resistant strains. (A) GISA-992; (B) VREF-590. (C) MRSA-494. Key: GISA-992. D10, daptomycin at 10 mg/kg q24h (); D6, daptomycin at 6 mg/kg q24h (); V, vancomycin q12h (down-triangle); and GC, growth control (triangle ).

Daptomycin's Cmax/MIC and AUC/MIC (in absence/presence of albumin) were as follows: GISA-992, 312.6/9.5 and 3,454/107.9; VREF-590, 64.9/4.0 and 710.2/44.4; and MRSA-494, 570.4/142.6 and 6,020.4/1,505.1 with D10 and GISA-992, 208.4/6.5 and 1,991.2/62.2; VREF-590, 50.0/3.1 and 496.8/31.1; and MRSA-494, 452.4/113.1 and 4,038.8/1,009.7 with D6, respectively. The Cmax/MIC and AUC/MIC values for vancomycin were 4.4 and 0.6, 78.4 and 63.2, and 7.1 and 1,135.2, respectively, for GISA-992, VREF-590, and MRSA-494.

The pH ranged from 6.95 to 7.19 for the 0-, 8-, 24-, 48-, and 72-h time points in all of the daptomycin experiments.

Resistance. There was no evidence of daptomycin resistance observed at any of the samples at the 24-, 32-, 48-, and 72-h time points.


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

There is an increasing need for alternative agents in deep-seated infections, such as endocarditis and osteomyelitis, especially with the increasing incidence of resistant gram-positive organisms. Vancomycin, until the development of glycopeptide resistance, has been the agent employed against these organisms. Now, with the increasing incidence of VRE and the isolation of GISA, resistant organisms are becoming a concern, as viable treatment options become more limited.

Caron et. al. conducted an experimental endocarditis study, in which daptomycin was shown to consistently have homogeneous distribution throughout the vegetations (4). Their study showed that daptomycin had trough concentrations in the vegetations of approximately greater than or equal to half the trough concentrations that were obtained in serum. In an earlier experimental endocarditis study evaluating vancomycin against moderately penicillin and highly glycopeptide-resistant Enterococcus faecium, trough concentrations for vancomycin were shown to be substantially lower in the vegetations than in serum, a result which is similar to our findings (3).

In a rabbit endocarditis study evaluating daptomycin versus teicoplanin and vancomycin against S. aureus, daptomycin was found to be as efficacious as high-dose teicoplanin and was more efficacious, in some strains, than low-dose teicoplanin or vancomycin (9).

Daptomycin is approximately 93% protein bound (6, 11, 14; Brier et al., 29th ICAAC). Past in vivo experiments have led to less-than-desirable outcomes in deep-seated infections, including endocarditis. This was thought to be attributed to the high degree of protein binding and/or lower-than-optimal dosing, which resulted in lower-than-expected serum concentrations of daptomycin. In our in vitro infection model with SEVs, we dosed daptomycin using total drug concentrations. Our initial experiments in the SEV model using simulated free concentrations of daptomycin 6 mg/kg q24h and 3 mg/kg q12h for GISA-992 displayed no bactericidal activity. We suspected that the SEV protein content may have contributed to these observations. The material (cryoprecipitate) used to make the simulated vegetations was tested for albumin and total protein content. The cryoprecipitate was found to have an average of 3 to 3.5 g of albumin and 6.8 to 7.4 g of total protein per dl. The extensive KC experiments conducted in our laboratory demonstrated no difference in kill rates when daptomycin was added to albumin-SMHB, SEV-SMHB, or SEV-SMHB plus albumin. Therefore, the protein in our models mimics the protein found in humans, and this allowed for a better comparison between our results and in vivo studies.

Although our experiment was not designed to evaluate optimal pharmacodynamic predictors, a recent pharmacodynamic study determined that the outcome was predicted by the AUC/MIC ratio (A. Louie, P. Kaw, W. Liu, N. L. Jumbe, G. Vasudevan, M. H. Miller, and G. L. Drusano, 39th ICAAC, abstr. 173-A p. 1770, 1999). This study demonstrated, in an S. aureus strain with an MIC of 1 µg/ml, that an 80% effective dose was associated with an AUC of 114.8. In our experiments both regimens of daptomycin obtained significantly higher AUCs; even though the AUC/MIC values were significantly lower for GISA-992 and VREF-590, both the D10 and the D6 regimens resulted in significant killing against these organisms.

In our experiments we observed a concentration-dependent killing with daptomycin. In previous studies, it has been shown that, depending on the concentration of daptomycin, the presence of protein can significantly decrease the activity of daptomycin. These studies compared earlier dosing schemes of 2 mg/kg q24h and 3 mg/kg q12h. Daptomycin at 6 mg/kg administered as a q24h dose is currently being evaluated for the treatment of bacteremia. A study evaluating the effect of the postantibiotic effect (PAE) on Enterococcus faecalis and S. aureus found that dose-dependent effects were seen (6). These authors reported an approximately 1- to 7-h PAE when a daptomycin dose of 16 µg/ml was used. Daptomycin's concentration-dependent killing, long PAE, and long terminal half-life lends itself to once-daily dosing. While a 10-mg/kg/day dose has yet to be evaluated in animals or humans, we wanted to optimize the concentration-dependent effect of daptomycin so that we could more easily determine whether killing could be enhanced for organisms with higher MICs.

In conclusion, daptomycin at 6 or 10 mg/kg/day has significant activity (P < 0.05) against drug resistant gram-positive organisms. There appears to be a concentration-dependent killing noted with daptomycin. The kills achieved by both regimens demonstrated similar activity. However, if larger doses (e.g., 10 mg/kg/day) were needed, further studies would be necessary to evaluate the potential utility of this regimen.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Raymond Cha for his contribution with the KC experiments and for help in preparing the manuscript. We acknowledge Abbott Diagnostics for the use of the TDx analyzer for the assay of vancomycin.


    ADDENDUM

When susceptibilities to daptomycin were retested in December 2000, they were found to be slightly different from those determined at the time of the experiment. The MICs and MBCs for GISA 992 were 0.5 and 1.0 µg/ml, respectively, in the absence of albumin and 4 and 8 µg/ml, respectively, in the presence of albumin; the MICs and MBCs for VREF-590 were both 4 µg/ml in the absence of albumin and 8 and 32 µg/ml, respectively, in the presence of albumin. No changes were observed for MRSA-494.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: The Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Services (1B), Detroit Receiving Hospital and University Health Center, 4201 St. Antoine Blvd., Detroit, MI 48201. Phone: (313) 745-4554. Fax: (313) 993-2522. E-mail: m.rybak{at}wayne.edu.

dagger Present address: School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Texas Tech University, Amarillo, TX 79106.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Akins, R. L., and M. J. Rybak. 2000. In vitro activities of daptomycin, arbekacin, vancomycin, and gentamicin alone and/or in combination against glycopeptide intermediate-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an infection model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1925-1929[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Anonymous. 1997. Interim guidelines for prevention and control of staphylococcal infection associated with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 46:626-628[Medline],635.
3. Caron, F., C. Carbon, and L. Gutmann. 1991. Triple-combination penicillin-vancomycin-gentamicin for experimental endocarditis caused by a moderately penicillin- and highly glycopeptide-resistant isolate of Enterococcus faecium. J. Infect. Dis. 164:888-893[Medline].
4. Caron, F., M. D. Kitzis, L. Gutmann, A. C. Cremieux, B. Maziere, J. M. Vallois, A. Saleh-Mghir, J. F. Lemeland, and C. Carbon. 1992. Daptomycin or teicoplanin in combination with gentamicin for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to a highly glycopeptide-resistant isolate of Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:2611-2616[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1998. Summary of notifiable diseases, United States. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 47:19.
6. Hanberger, H., L. E. Nilsson, R. Maller, and B. Isaksson. 1991. Pharmacodynamics of daptomycin and vancomycin on Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus demonstrated by studies of initial killing and postantibiotic effect and influence of Ca2+ and albumin on these drugs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:1710-1716[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. 1995. Recommendations for preventing the spread of vancomycin resistance. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 44:1-13[Medline].
8. Houlihan, H. H., D. P. Stokes, and M. J. Rybak. 2000. Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and ampicillin alone and in combination with gentamicin once-daily or thrice-daily against Enterococcus faecalis in an in vitro infection model. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 46:79-86[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Kaatz, G. W., S. M. Seo, V. N. Reddy, E. M. Bailey, and M. J. Rybak. 1990. Daptomycin compared with teicoplanin and vancomycin for therapy of experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:2081-2085[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. Lamp, K. C., M. J. Rybak, E. M. Bailey, and G. W. Kaatz. 1992. In vitro pharmacodynamic effects of concentration, pH, and growth phase on serum bactericidal activities of daptomycin and vancomycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:2709-2714[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Lee, B. L., M. Sachdeva, and H. F. Chambers. 1991. Effect of protein binding of daptomycin on MIC and antibacterial activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:2505-2508[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Moreira, B., S. Bolye-Vavra, B. L. M. de Jonge, and R. Daum. 1997. Increased production of penicillin-binding protein 2, increased detection of other penicillin-binding proteins, and decreased coagulase activity associated with glycopeptide resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1788-1793[Abstract].
13. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 4th ed. Approved standard M7-A4. NCCLS, Villanova, Pa.
14. Rybak, M. J., E. M. Bailey, K. C. Lamp, and G. W. Kaatz. 1992. Pharmacokinetics and bactericidal rates of daptomycin and vancomycin in intravenous drug abusers being treated for gram-positive endocarditis and bacteremia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:1109-1114[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Rybak, M. J., E. M. Bailey, and V. N. Reddy. 1991. Clinical evaluation of teicoplanin fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:1586-1590[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Sieradzki, K., and A. Tomasz. 1997. Inhibition of cell wall turnover and autolysis by vancomycin in a highly vancomycin-resistant mutant of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 179:2557-2566[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17. Tenover, F. C., M. V. Lancaster, B. C. Hill, C. D. Steward, S. A. Stocker, G. A. Hancock, C. M. O'Hara, N. C. Clark, and K. Hiramatsu. 1998. Characterization of staphylococci with reduced susceptibilities to vancomycin and other glycopeptides. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:1020-1027[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. Wenzel, R. P., and M. B. Edmond. 1998. Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: infection control considerations. Clin. Infect. Dis. 27:245-251[Medline].


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 2001, p. 454-459, Vol. 45, No. 2
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.2.454-459.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Bowker, K. E., Noel, A. R., MacGowan, A. P. (2009). Comparative antibacterial effects of daptomycin, vancomycin and teicoplanin studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 64: 1044-1051 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Leonard, S. N., Vidaillac, C., Rybak, M. J. (2009). Activity of Telavancin against Staphylococcus aureus Strains with Various Vancomycin Susceptibilities in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model with Simulated Endocardial Vegetations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 2928-2933 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • McKay, G. A., Beaulieu, S., Arhin, F. F., Belley, A., Sarmiento, I., Parr, T. Jr, Moeck, G. (2009). Time-kill kinetics of oritavancin and comparator agents against Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. J Antimicrob Chemother 63: 1191-1199 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bubalo, J. S., Munar, M. Y., Cherala, G., Hayes-Lattin, B., Maziarz, R. (2009). Daptomycin Pharmacokinetics in Adult Oncology Patients with Neutropenic Fever. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 428-434 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Leonard, S. N., Rybak, M. J. (2009). Evaluation of vancomycin and daptomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and heterogeneously vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations. J Antimicrob Chemother 63: 155-160 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Warren, R. E. (2008). Daptomycin in endocarditis and bacteraemia: a British perspective. J Antimicrob Chemother 62: iii25-iii33 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • LaPlante, K. L., Leonard, S. N., Andes, D. R., Craig, W. A., Rybak, M. J. (2008). Activities of Clindamycin, Daptomycin, Doxycycline, Linezolid, Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole, and Vancomycin against Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus with Inducible Clindamycin Resistance in Murine Thigh Infection and In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Models. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 2156-2162 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rose, W. E., Leonard, S. N., Sakoulas, G., Kaatz, G. W., Zervos, M. J., Sheth, A., Carpenter, C. F., Rybak, M. J. (2008). Daptomycin Activity against Staphylococcus aureus following Vancomycin Exposure in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model with Simulated Endocardial Vegetations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 831-836 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sakoulas, G., Rose, W., Rybak, M. J., Pillai, S., Alder, J., Moellering, R. C. Jr., Eliopoulos, G. M. (2008). Evaluation of Endocarditis Caused by Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Developing Nonsusceptibility to Daptomycin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 220-224 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Firsov, A. A., Smirnova, M. V., Lubenko, I. Yu., Vostrov, S. N., Portnoy, Y. A., Zinner, S. H. (2006). Testing the mutant selection window hypothesis with Staphylococcus aureus exposed to daptomycin and vancomycin in an in vitro dynamic model. J Antimicrob Chemother 58: 1185-1192 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Vouillamoz, J., Moreillon, P., Giddey, M., Entenza, J. M. (2006). Efficacy of daptomycin in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to susceptible and multidrug-resistant enterococci. J Antimicrob Chemother 58: 1208-1214 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wootton, M., MacGowan, A. P., Walsh, T. R. (2006). Comparative Bactericidal Activities of Daptomycin and Vancomycin against Glycopeptide-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (GISA) and Heterogeneous GISA Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 4195-4197 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jorgensen, J. H., Crawford, S. A. (2006). Assessment of Two Commercial Susceptibility Test Methods for Determination of Daptomycin MICs.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 2126-2129 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sakoulas, G., Alder, J., Thauvin-Eliopoulos, C., Moellering, R. C. Jr., Eliopoulos, G. M. (2006). Induction of Daptomycin Heterogeneous Susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus by Exposure to Vancomycin.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 1581-1585 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cui, L., Tominaga, E., Neoh, H.-m., Hiramatsu, K. (2006). Correlation between Reduced Daptomycin Susceptibility and Vancomycin Resistance in Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 1079-1082 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Huang, V., Rybak, M. J. (2006). Evaluation of daptomycin activity against Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model under normal and simulated impaired renal function. J Antimicrob Chemother 57: 116-121 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pankey, G., Ashcraft, D., Patel, N. (2005). In Vitro Synergy of Daptomycin plus Rifampin against Enterococcus faecium Resistant to both Linezolid and Vancomycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 5166-5168 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hayden, M. K., Rezai, K., Hayes, R. A., Lolans, K., Quinn, J. P., Weinstein, R. A. (2005). Development of Daptomycin Resistance In Vivo in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 5285-5287 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shah, M., Murillo, J. L (2005). Successful Treatment of Corynebacterium striatum Endocarditis with Daptomycin plus Rifampin. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 39: 1741-1743 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tsuji, B. T., Rybak, M. J. (2005). Short-Course Gentamicin in Combination with Daptomycin or Vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model with Simulated Endocardial Vegetations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 2735-2745 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Miao, V., Coeffet-LeGal, M.-F., Brian, P., Brost, R., Penn, J., Whiting, A., Martin, S., Ford, R., Parr, I., Bouchard, M., Silva, C. J., Wrigley, S. K., Baltz, R. H. (2005). Daptomycin biosynthesis in Streptomyces roseosporus: cloning and analysis of the gene cluster and revision of peptide stereochemistry. Microbiology 151: 1507-1523 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Huang, V., Rybak, M. J. (2005). Pharmacodynamics of Cefepime Alone and in Combination with Various Antimicrobials against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Infection Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 302-308 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • LaPlante, K. L., Rybak, M. J. (2004). Impact of High-Inoculum Staphylococcus aureus on the Activities of Nafcillin, Vancomycin, Linezolid, and Daptomycin, Alone and in Combination with Gentamicin, in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 4665-4672 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cha, R., Rybak, M. J. (2004). Influence of protein binding under controlled conditions on the bactericidal activity of daptomycin in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. J Antimicrob Chemother 54: 259-262 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jorgensen, J. H., Crawford, S. A., Kelly, C. C., Patterson, J. E. (2003). In Vitro Activity of Daptomycin against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci of Various Van Types and Comparison of Susceptibility Testing Methods. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3760-3763 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cha, R., Brown, W. J., Rybak, M. J. (2003). Bactericidal Activities of Daptomycin, Quinupristin-Dalfopristin, and Linezolid against Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model with Simulated Endocardial Vegetations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3960-3963 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Alder, J., Li, T., Yu, D., Morton, L., Silverman, J., Zhang, X.-X., Critchley, I., Thorne, G. (2003). Analysis of Daptomycin Efficacy and Breakpoint Standards in a Murine Model of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Renal Infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3561-3566 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dandekar, P. K., Tessier, P. R., Williams, P., Nightingale, C. H., Nicolau, D. P. (2003). Pharmacodynamic profile of daptomycin against Enterococcus species and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a murine thigh infection model. J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 405-411 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Vaudaux, P., Francois, P., Bisognano, C., Li, D., Lew, D. P., Schrenzel, J. (2003). Comparative efficacy of daptomycin and vancomycin in the therapy of experimental foreign body infection due to Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 89-95 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Critchley, I. A., Blosser-Middleton, R. S., Jones, M. E., Thornsberry, C., Sahm, D. F., Karlowsky, J. A. (2003). Baseline Study To Determine In Vitro Activities of Daptomycin against Gram-Positive Pathogens Isolated in the United States in 2000-2001. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1689-1693 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sakoulas, G., Eliopoulos, G. M., Alder, J., Eliopoulos, C. T. (2003). Efficacy of Daptomycin in Experimental Endocarditis Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcusaureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1714-1718 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Akins, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rybak, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Akins, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rybak, M. J.