Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2001, p. 1281-1283, Vol. 45, No. 4
Department of Internal Medicine, National
Cheng Kung University Hospital,1 and
Departments of Medicine,2
Microbiology and Immunology,3 and
Medical Technology,4 National Cheng Kung
University Medical College, Tainan, Taiwan
Received 18 August 2000/Returned for modification 1 November
2000/Accepted 5 January 2001
The activities of cefotaxime and minocycline against
Aeromonas hydrophila were investigated. Cefotaxime (4 times
the MIC) plus minocycline (0.75 times the MIC) elicited an inhibitory
effect for 48 h in a time-kill study, and more infected mice
treated with both drugs survived (91%) than survived after treatment
with cefotaxime (9%) or minocycline (44%) alone, suggesting that
cefotaxime and minocycline act synergistically against A. hydrophila.
Although not common isolates from
the clinical microbiology laboratory, Aeromonas species can
cause bacteremia (4, 5, 8, 9, 11), spontaneous bacterial
peritonitis (11), and invasive soft-tissue infections
(6) in immunocompromised hosts. The outcome of invasive
Aeromonas infection usually is poor. Despite the empirical
administration of a Clinical bacteremic strain A136 from a patient with a fire burn was
used. It was susceptible to cefotaxime (MIC by E test: 0.75 µg/ml)
and minocycline (MIC by E test: 4 µg/ml), as previously described
(10). Nineteen clinical strains of A. hydrophila HG 1 were randomly collected from National Cheng Kung
University Hospital. The susceptibility testing of the isolates was
done by the agar dilution method (13). The MICs for the
surviving subpopulation of A136 after 48 h of coculture with
antibiotics were determined by E-test strips (AB Biodisk, Solna,
Sweden). The method of the time-kill study was as previously described (2). Briefly, the overnight bacterial suspension was
diluted to 5 × 105 CFU/ml in 50 ml of fresh
Luria-Bertani (LB) broth. The suspensions containing various drug
concentrations were incubated at 35°C. Bacterial counts were measured
at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h on LB agar. All the experiments were
performed at least twice.
A136 was incubated in Mueller-Hinton broth overnight, and after 3 h of incubation in sterile broth, the pellet obtained after centrifugation was diluted to the anticipated turbidity for mouse experiments. The antibiotic suspensions prepared from commercial vials
of cefotaxime and minocycline were freshly diluted and were injected
into the peritoneums of inbred BALB/c mice weighing 20 g on
average and 5 to 6 weeks old. Following intraperitoneal injection of
A136, mice develop severe peritonitis with fatal sepsis if untreated
(7). Therefore, cefotaxime at 150 mg/kg of body weight every 6 h, minocycline at 20 mg/kg every 12 h, and both in
combination were given 2 h after the intraperitoneal bacterial
inoculation. Antibiotics were administered for 48 h. In the first
72 h after the initiation of Aeromonas infection, the
number of surviving mice was recorded four times daily. There were two
control groups. Mice in one group were infected by A136 without
treatment; those in the other group were not infected and received
cefotaxime, minocycline, or both in combination intraperitoneally. For
comparison of categorical variables, the The MICs of cefotaxime, minocycline, and tetracycline for 20 clinical
strains and a control strain, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, are shown in Table 1. The MICs of
cefotaxime (0.5 µg/ml) and minocycline (2 µg/ml) by the agar
dilution method were one dilution variation from or identical to those
determined by E tests (0.75 and 4 µg/ml, respectively). There were no
colonies grown within the zones of inhibition around E-test strips.
However, the MICs for A136 of cefotaxime and minocycline were 16 and 2 µg/ml, respectively, by the broth dilution method. For the clone obtained from the broth with A136 and cefotaxime at 0.75 or 3 µg/ml
alone or in combination with minocycline at 3 µg/ml after 48 h
of incubation, the MIC of cefotaxime was >256 µg/ml and the MIC of
minocycline was the same as that for the initial strain (Table
2). The phenotypic expression of
cefotaxime resistance was stable even after repeated passage of
resistant subpopulations. In contrast, the MICs of cefotaxime for the
A136 subpopulation after coculture with 3 µg of minocycline/ml did
not increase but the MIC of minocycline increased fourfold.
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.4.1281-1283.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
In Vitro and in Vivo Combinations of Cefotaxime and
Minocycline against Aeromonas hydrophila

![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
-lactam agent active in vitro with or without an
aminoglycoside, 36% of 59 episodes of Aeromonas bacteremia
were associated with fatality in the hospital (9). Cefotaxime, a broad-spectrum cephalosporin, is active in vitro against
Aeromonas species, but there is a potential risk of
emergence of derepressed mutants during
-lactam therapy for
Aeromonas infections (10, 15). The combination
of cefotaxime and minocycline has been demonstrated to be synergistic
against Vibrio vulnificus in vitro (2) and in
experiments with mice (3). Such a regimen has not been
studied for invasive Aeromonas infections, and thus the in
vitro activity of cefotaxime and minocycline in combination against
Aeromonas hydrophila and the therapeutic potential of combination therapy in murine Aeromonas infections were examined.
2
test or the two-tailed Fisher exact test was employed and a
P value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
TABLE 1.
MICs of cefotaxime, minocycline, and tetracycline
determined by agar dilution for 20 clinical strains of A. hydrophila HG 1, including A136, and E. coli ATCC 25922
TABLE 2.
MICs for A136 surviving subpopulation isolated after 48-h
cocultures with antimicrobial agent
In time-kill studies, cefotaxime ranging from 0.37 to 6 µg/ml
exhibited an inhibitory effect for 2 h and thereafter the bacteria began to regrow (Fig. 1a). In contrast,
with minocycline concentrations at less than three times of the MIC
before 24 h, the magnitude and duration of the inhibitory effect were
proportional to the minocycline concentration, but sustained
bactericidal activity was found until 48 h with a minocycline
concentration of 12 µg/ml, three times the MIC (Fig. 1b). Minocycline
at 3 µg/ml combined with cefotaxime at 0.75 µg/ml resulted in a
reduction of viable bacterial colonies by at least 2 orders of
magnitude at 24 h (Fig. 2a),
compared with either drug alone, but regrowth occurred after 24 h.
However, a higher cefotaxime concentration, 3 µg/ml, combined with
minocycline at 3 µg/ml caused a reduction by at least 4 orders of
magnitude compared to either of the two drugs alone (Fig. 2b).
|
|
All mice infected with A136 without antibiotic therapy died within
24 h. Intraperitoneal administration of cefotaxime, minocycline, or a combination of the two for 48 h did not cause mortality or a
decline in physical activity. With the same intraperitoneal inoculum
and regular antimicrobial therapy initiated 2 h after bacterial
inoculation, mice treated with cefotaxime and minocycline were more
likely to survive than those treated with cefotaxime or minocycline
alone (Table 3).
|
Rapid regrowth of A136 occurred even with cefotaxime at a concentration
of eight times the MIC. Cefotaxime-resistant (MIC, >256 µg/ml) and
minocycline-susceptible (MIC, 4 µg/ml) Aeromonas strains
were isolated from the broth containing A136 and a subinhibitory concentration of cefotaxime alone or combined with minocycline after
48 h of coculture. These findings suggest that a preexisting resistant subpopulation would be selected by cefotaxime alone and could
be killed in the presence of cefotaxime and minocycline. Given the
rapid regrowth of A136 in the broth containing 6 µg of cefotaxime/ml
and the discrepancy between the cefotaxime MICs by the broth dilution
method and the agar dilution method, it is likely that the biomass
contacting the antimicrobial agent in broth studies is larger than that
in agar plates and thus the trend of selection of resistant clones
would be more evident in broth studies. Minocycline has been shown to
be capable of inhibition of total protein and
-lactamase synthesis
in
-lactamase-producing Staphylococcus aureus
(1). The in vitro effect of minocycline on
-lactamase
production in gram-negative bacteria was not reported. The hypothesis
that the inhibition of
-lactamase production by minocycline
contributes to the incremental activity of cefotaxime against
Aeromonas remains plausible.
The peak serum cefotaxime concentrations after administration of 100 and 200 mg/kg to mice were 94 and 180 µg/ml (14), respectively, which are close to 100- and 200-µg/ml serum levels in humans after parenteral administration of 1 (15 mg/kg) and 2 g (30 mg/kg), respectively, of cefotaxime (12). According to the relevant pharmacokinetics data in mice, the dosage of cefotaxime (150 mg/kg) in our study could achieve the same serum drug levels in mice as the recommended dosage (30 mg/kg) for children did. The pharmacokinetics information for minocycline in mice was very limited in that the dosage of minocycline, 20 mg/kg, that we used in the present experiment with mice was five times the usual dosage for children (4 mg/kg), as was the selected cefotaxime dosage.
The mouse model of Aeromonas peritonitis has been clearly demonstrated to cause invasive infections in mice (7), mimicking Aeromonas bacteremia in humans as our control mice with bacterial inoculation alone died within 24 h. With this murine model of Aeromonas infection, the therapeutic superiority of the combination regimen was found. Therefore, such a combination regimen can be the empirical treatment for suspected Vibrio or Aeromonas necrotizing fasciitis in cases with severe soft-tissue infections following exposure to contaminated water or marine creatures.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This study was supported by a grant (NSC 88-2314-B-006-027) from the National Science Council, Taiwan, Republic of China.
We thank Yu V.L. for his critical review of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Medical Technology, National Cheng Kung University Medical College, No. 1 University Rd., Tainan, Taiwan. Phone: 886-6-2353535, ext. 5775. Fax: 886-6-2363956. E-mail: jjwu{at}mail.ncku.edu.tw.
Present address: Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical
Center, Yung Kang City, Tainan 710, Taiwan.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Chopra, I., and M. A. Anderson.
1985.
Inhibition of -lactamase synthesis in Staphylococcus aureus by minocycline.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
16:17-21 |
| 2. | Chuang, Y. C., J. W. Liu, W. C. Ko, K. Y. Lin, J. J. Wu, and K. Y. Huang. 1997. In vitro synergism between cefotaxime and minocycline against Vibrio vulnificus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2214-2217[Abstract]. |
| 3. |
Chuang, Y. C.,
W. C. Ko,
S. T. Wang,
J. W. Liu,
C. F. Kuo,
J. J. Wu, and K. Y. Huang.
1998.
Minocycline and cefotaxime in the treatment of experimental murine Vibrio vulnificus infection.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:1319-1322 |
| 4. | Duthie, D., T. W. Ling, A. F. B. Cheng, and G. L. French. 1995. Aeromonas septicaemia in Hong Kong: species distribution and associated disease. J. Infect. 30:241-244[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. | Funada, H., and T. Matsuda. 1997. Aeromonas bacteremia in patients with hematologic diseases. Intern. Med. 36:171-174[Medline]. |
| 6. | Gold, W. I., and I. E. Salit. 1993. Aeromonas hydrophila infections of skin and soft tissue: report of 11 cases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 16:69-74[Medline]. |
| 7. | Janda, J. M., R. B. Clark, and R. Brenden. 1985. Virulence of Aeromonas species as assessed through mouse lethality studies. Curr. Microbiol. 12:163-168. |
| 8. | Janda, J. M., L. S. Guthertz, R. P. Kokka, and T. Shimada. 1994. Aeromonas species in septicemia: laboratory characteristics and clinical observations. Clin. Infect. Dis. 19:77-83[Medline]. |
| 9. | Ko, W. C., and Y. C. Chuang. 1995. Aeromonas bacteremia: review of 59 episodes. Clin. Infect. Dis. 20:1298-1304[Medline]. |
| 10. |
Ko, W. C.,
H. M. Wu,
T. C. Chang,
J. J. Yan, and J. J. Wu.
1998.
Inducible -lactam resistance in Aeromonas hydrophila: therapeutic challenge for antimicrobial therapy.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:3188-3192 |
| 11. | Ko, W. C., H. C. Lee, Y. C. Chuang, C. C. Liu, and J. J. Wu. 2000. Clinical features and therapeutic implications of 104 episodes of monomicrobial Aeromonas bacteremia. J. Infect. 40:267-273[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. |
Luthy, R.,
J. Blaser,
A. Bonetti,
H. Simmen,
R. Wise, and W. Siegenthaler.
1981.
Comparative multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime, moxalactam, and ceftazidime.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
20:567-575 |
| 13. | National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing for bacteria that grow aerobically, 4th ed. Approved standard M7-A4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa. |
| 14. |
Soriano, F.,
C. Ponte,
E. Nieto, and A. Parra.
1996.
Correlation of in-vitro activity and pharmacokinetic parameters with in-vivo effect of amoxycillin, co-amoxiclav and cefotaxime in a murine model of pneumococcal pneumonia.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
38:227-236 |
| 15. |
Walsh, T. R.,
R. A. Stunt,
J. A. Nabl,
A. P. MacGowan, and P. M. Bennett.
1997.
Distribution and expression of -lactamase genes among Aeromonas spp.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
40:171-178 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»