This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aritaka, N.
Right arrow Articles by Hiramatsu, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aritaka, N.
Right arrow Articles by Hiramatsu, K.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2001, p. 1292-1294, Vol. 45, No. 4
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.4.1292-1294.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Combination Effect of Vancomycin and beta -Lactams against a Staphylococcus aureus Strain, Mu3, with Heterogeneous Resistance to Vancomycin

Nanae Aritaka, Hideaki Hanaki, Longzhu Cui, and Keiichi Hiramatsu*

Department of Bacteriology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan

Received 12 April 2000/Returned for modification 7 June 2000/Accepted 18 January 2001


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

We tested the combined activity of vancomycin and seven beta -lactam antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain Mu3, which displays heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin. When combined with vancomycin, four of the seven tested beta -lactams exhibited an additive effect at or near their MICs, while all showed an antagonistic effect at lower, sub-MIC levels. This study implicated the unpredictable nature of combination therapy of beta -lactams and vancomycin against S. aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Mu3 (ATCC 700698) is a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain with heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin, designated heterogeneously vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (hetero-VRSA) (8, 12, 13). Here VRSA is equivalent to vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (22); the difference in meaning between "intermediate" and "resistant" derives from the NCCLS definition of a MIC of 8 µg/ml as intermediate, while in other locations, the breakpoints are lower (e.g., "resistant" is used for MICs of >= 8 µg/ml in Great Britain and >= 4 µg/ml in Japan). We define a hetero-VRSA strain as an S. aureus strain that satisfies all of the following criteria. (i) Its vancomycin MIC is less than 8 µg/ml when determined by NCCLS-based broth dilution methods. (ii) It contains subpopulations of cells resistant to higher concentrations of vancomycin, including 4 µg of vancomycin/ml. (iii) Mutant strains with increased vancomycin resistance (a MIC of >= 8 µg/ml) can be obtained from the strain by one-step vancomycin-selection procedure with a frequency of 1 in 1,000,000 or greater (12).

To screen clinical S. aureus isolates for hetero-VRSA strains, we proposed a plating efficiency test on brain heart infusion (BHI) agar containing 4 µg of vancomycin/ml (12). Strains yielding countable numbers of colonies on the plate by plating, about 107 CFU, are considered candidates for hetero-VRSA. Confirmation of a heterogeneous susceptible pattern by subsequent population analysis and by the derivation test of resistant mutants (with a MIC of >= 8 µg/ml) is required for the final identification of hetero-VRSA (12).

Researchers earlier noticed a property of Mu3, an antagonistic phenomenon between vancomycin and beta -lactam antibiotics, when they were searching for an effective combination therapy against infection caused by Mu3-like MRSA strains (11). The antagonism was demonstrated as a thick growth of Mu3 cells around the paper disks that were impregnated with beta -lactam antibiotics and placed on the above screening agar (11). In the present study, we adopted a broth dilution method to better quantify the antagonistic phenomenon between vancomycin and beta -lactam antibiotics observed on the screening agar plate.

The 1.0-ml BHI broth (Difco, Detroit, Mich.) containing various concentrations of vancomycin (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 µg/ml) and beta -lactam antibiotics (0 to 1,024 µg/ml) was inoculated with 107 CFU of Mu3. Tested beta -lactams were oxacillin, ampicillin, cefoxitin, cefmetazole (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.); penicillin G (Meiji Pharmacy Co., Tokyo, Japan); piperacillin (Toyama Pharmacy Co., Toyama, Japan); and imipenem (Banyu Pharmacy Co., Tokyo, Japan). The optical density at 578 nm (OD578) of the cultures after a 24-h incubation at 37°C was measured using a U-3200 spectrophotometer (Hitachi Inc., Tokyo, Japan), and expressed as "OD curves" after smoothing using Kaleidagraph (version 3.0.5; Synergy Software, Reading, Pa.). Correlation coefficients were calculated with a simple regression analysis program (StatView version 4.11; Abacus Concepts, Inc, Berkeley, Calif.).

To test the effect of beta -lactam on the cell wall synthesis, test tubes holding 5 ml each of BHI broth with 4 µg of vancomycin/ml plus varied concentrations of beta -lactam antibiotics ranging from 0 to 1,000 µg/ml were prepared. To them were added Mu3 cells to a final cell density of 3 × 10 7 CFU/ml and 8 µl of [14C]GlcNAc (1.48 MBq/ml; Amersham Life Science, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, England). The tube preparations were then incubated at 37°C with shaking. A 0.5-ml portion of the culture was taken from each test tube after 0, 1, 2, and 3 h of incubation and was subjected to the measurement of incorporated radioactivity as described previously (8).

Figure 1A shows that addition of ampicillin in the concentration range of 0.01 to 1 µg/ml helped Mu3 cells grow in an otherwise inhibitory concentration of vancomycin (4 µg/ml). There was an optimal ampicillin concentration within the range of antagonism that elicited maximum cell growth beyond an OD578 of 1.7. The optimal concentration for antagonism (OCA) was thus defined from the OD curve (with a procedure illustrated in Fig. 1A) as the concentration of beta -lactam that allows cells to grow to the highest opacity in the presence of inhibitory concentrations of vancomycin. On the other hand, a slight additive effect was observed at higher ampicillin concentrations of 8 and 16 µg/ml, which corresponded to one-fourth and one-half of the MIC against Mu3 (Table 1). Antagonism similar to that demonstrated with ampicillin in Fig. 1A was observed with all seven tested beta -lactams, although the range of concentrations eliciting antagonism and the OCA varied considerably among them (Table 1). The additive effect demonstrated with ampicillin was observed with four of the seven tested beta -lactams at concentrations near their MICs. Table 1 summarizes the ranges of concentrations eliciting either antagonism or an additive effect for each antibiotic and shows that the OCA of each antibiotic was considerably less than the MIC of the antibiotic against Mu3. On the other hand, the OCA for beta -lactam with Mu3 was very close to the MIC of each beta -lactam against the methicillin-susceptible S. aureus type strain FDA 209P (ATCC 6538P): there was a significant correlation between the OCA for Mu3 and the MIC for FDA 209P (correlation coefficient = 0.994, P < 0.0001).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   The effect of ampicillin on the growth and peptidoglycan synthesis of Mu3 in the presence of vancomycin. (A) Growth of Mu3 cells in 4 µg of vancomycin/ml and various concentrations of ampicillin. Turbidity of the culture was monitored after 24-h incubation at 37°C. The concentration of a beta -lactam that makes the cell grow to maximum opacity in 4 µg of vancomycin/ml is defined as the OCA of the beta -lactam. (B) Ampicillin reverses vancomycin-mediated suppression of peptidoglycan synthesis of Mu3. Uptake of [14C]N-acetyl-D-glucosamine by Mu3 cells was measured in the broth containing 4 µg of vancomycin/ml with and without various concentrations of ampicillin. Symbols: empty circles, no antibiotic; solid circles, 4 µg of vancomycin/ml alone; other symbols, 4 µg of vancomycin/ml plus ampicillin. Ampicillin concentrations in micrograms per milliliter were 0.001 (open triangles), 0.01 (solid triangles), 0.1 (empty squares), 1 (solid squares), 10 (empty diamonds), 100 (solid diamonds), and 1,000 (crosses). CPM, counts per minute.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   beta -Lactam in combination with vancomycin elicits both additive and antagonistic effects against Mu3, depending on the concentration

Figure 1B shows the uptake of N-acetyl-D-1-14C-glucosamine ([14C]GlcNAc) by Mu3 cells, a major precursor nutrient of cell wall peptidoglycan synthesis. Vancomycin at 4 µg/ml suppressed GlcNAc uptake to less than 17% of that with the drug-free control throughout the measured period. In the copresence of ampicillin, however, there was a significant recovery of uptake at the range of ampicillin concentration between 0.1 and 10 µg/ml, and maximum recovery was observed at 1 µg/ml. These values coincided well with the antagonism-eliciting concentrations of ampicillin (Fig. 1A). The reversal of vancomycin-mediated suppression was also demonstrated within the range of antagonistic concentrations for each of the seven beta -lactam antibiotics (not shown).

We and others have reported isolation of Mu3-like hetero-VRSA strains from clinical specimens (6, 9, 12, 23, 24) which are sometimes associated with infections that were refractory to vancomycin therapy (9, 12, 23, 24). Whether such cases could be or should be treated with vancomycin plus a beta -lactam combination is a focus of argument (9). Besides Mu3, we have tested 20 such hetero-VRSA clinical isolates obtained from 10 hospitals in Japan for the antagonism between selected beta -lactam antibiotics and vancomycin: all showed antagonism OD curves and OCAs similar to those demonstrated with Mu3 (N. Aritaka, unpublished observation).

Currently, the mechanism for beta -lactam-elicited antagonism or the reversal of vancomycin-mediated suppression of cell wall synthesis is unknown. These observations may indicate existence of a novel sub-MIC effect of beta -lactam antibiotics, inducing activation of cell wall synthesis of S. aureus. It has been demonstrated recently that beta -lactams can induce expression of certain cell wall synthesis-associated genes, such as pbp2, in S. aureus (17). Recently, we have also found that beta -lactams induce increased transcription of a response regulator gene, vraR, which is considered to be at least partially responsible for the increased vancomycin resistance in Mu3 (16). Therefore, it seems plausible to postulate that beta -lactams induce activation of cell wall synthesis of Mu3 cells. If we consider that the induction is triggered upon saturation by beta -lactams of the intrinsic set of S. aureus penicillin-binding proteins, the reason why OCA values are close to the MICs of beta -lactams for S. aureus type strain FDA 209P would be explained. An alternative and equally attractive explanation for the antagonism is that beta -lactams act by reducing cross-linking of peptidoglycan of Mu3. Reduced cross-linking increases the number of D-alanyl-D-alanine residues in the cell wall, which serve as "false targets" of vancomycin (11). More false targets trap and consume more vancomycin molecules within the cell wall layers, preventing efficient access of vancomycin molecules to their "real target," lipid II, on the cytoplasmic membrane.

There have been many contradictory observations with regard to the combination effect of vancomycin and beta -lactam against S. aureus clinical isolates, including additive and/or synergistic effects (2, 4, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21) and antagonistic effects (7, 9, 14; H. Hanaki, S. Ohkawa, Y. Inaba, T. Hashimoto, and K. Hiramatsu, Abstr. 38th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. C-132, 1998; this study). With Mu3, both additive and antagonistic effects were seen at high and low concentrations of beta -lactams, respectively. However, the additive concentrations (>= 128 µg/ml) (Table 1) are likely difficult to achieve in patients for most of the tested beta -lactam antibiotics. The exception was ampicillin, which is known to have relatively high antimicrobial activity against MRSA among extant beta -lactam antibiotics as long as beta -lactamase is countered (1, 3). (Ampicillin per se has potent activity against Mu3, because it does not produce penicillinase.) In terms of clinical application, however, both the additive and antagonistic ranges of concentration of ampicillin are achievable in patients for various time periods, which makes the prediction of the clinical effect of the combination difficult. We are concerned, therefore, that beta -lactam antibiotics may not provide a significant advantage in combination with vancomycin against Mu3-like hetero-VRSA strains.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Core University Program under the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), coordinated by the University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Medicine, and Universiti Sains Malaysia, School of Medical Sciences; by Specially Designated Research Promotion of Monbusho; by a Grant for International Health Cooperation Research (11-C) from the Ministry of Health and Welfare; and also by a nonrestricted research grant from Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, N.J.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Bacteriology, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 113-8421. Phone: 81-3-5802-1040. Fax: 81-3-5684-7830. E-mail: hiram{at}med.juntendo.ac.jp.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Asada, K., Y. Inaba, E. Tateda-Suzuki, K. Kuwahara-Arai, T. Ito, and K. Hiramatsu. 1995. Evolution and resistance expression of MRSA. Evaluation of beta -lactam antibiotics against a set of isogenic strains with different types of phenotypic expression. Acta Biochim. Pol. 42:517-524[Medline].
2. Barr, J. G., E. T. Smyth, and G. M. Hogg. 1990. In vitro antimicrobial activity of imipenem in combination with vancomycin or teicoplanin against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 9:804-809[CrossRef][Medline].
3. Chambers, H. F., and M. Sachdeva. 1990. Binding of beta -lactam antibiotics to penicillin-binding proteins in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 161:1170-1176[Medline].
4. Climo, W. M., R. L. Patron, and G. L. Archer. 1999. Combinations of vancomycin and beta -lactams are synergistic against staphylococci with reduced susceptibilities to vancomycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1747-1753[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Georgopapadakou, N. H., and F. Y. Liu. 1980. Penicillin-binding proteins in bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 18:148-157[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Guerin, F., A. Buu-Hoi, J. L. Mainardi, G. Kac, N. Colardelle, S. Vaupre, L. Gutmann, and I. Podglajen. 2000. Outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides in a Parisian hospital. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2985-2988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Hanaki, H., Y. Inaba, K. Sasaki, and K. Hiramatsu. 1998. A novel method of detecting Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin (hetero-VRSA). Jpn. J. Antibiot. 51:521-530[Medline]. (In Japanese.)
8. Hanaki, H., K. Kuwabara-Arai, S. Boyle-Vavra, R. S. Daum, H. Labischinski, and K. Hiramatsu. 1998. Activated cell-wall synthesis is associated with vancomycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strains Mu3 and Mu50. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 42:199-209[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Haraga, I., S. Nomura, and A. Nagayama. 1999. The effects of vancomycin and beta -lactam antibiotics against vancomycin low-level or intermediately resistant Staphylococcus aureus. N. Engl. J. Med. 341:1624-1625[Free Full Text].
10. Hartman, B. J., and A. Tomasz. 1984. Low-affinity penicillin-binding protein associated with beta -lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 158:513-516[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Hiramatsu, K. 1998. Vancomycin resistance in staphylococci. Drug Resist. Updates 1:135-150.
12. Hiramatsu, K., N. Aritaka, H. Hanaki, S. Kawasaki, Y. Hosoda, S. Hori, Y. Fukuchi, and I. Kobayashi. 1997. Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin. Lancet 350:1670-1673[CrossRef][Medline].
13. Hiramatsu, K., H. Hanaki, T. Ino, K. Yabuta, T. Oguri, and F. C. Tenover. 1997. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40:135-136[Free Full Text].
14. Howe, R. A., M. Wootton, P. M. Bennett, A. P. MacGowan, and T. R. Walsh. 1999. Interactions between methicillin and vancomycin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains displaying different phenotypes of vancomycin susceptibility. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:3068-3071[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Komatsuzawa, H., J. Suzuki, M. Sugai, Y. Miyake, and H. Suginaka. 1994. Effect of combination of oxacillin and nonbeta -lactam antibiotics on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 33:1155-1163[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Kuroda, M., K. Kuwabara-Arai, and K. Hiramatsu. 2000. Identification of the up- and down-regulated genes in vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains Mu3 and Mu50 by cDNA differential hybridization method. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 269:485-490[CrossRef][Medline].
17. Murakami, H., H. Matsumaru, M. Kanamori, H. Hayashi, and T. Ohta. 1999. Cell wall-affecting antibiotics induce expression of a novel gene, drp35, in Staphylococcus aureus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 264:348-351[CrossRef][Medline].
18. Seibert, G., D. Isert, N. Klesel, M. Limbert, A. Markus, and E. Schrinner. 1992. The in vitro antibacterial activity of a combination of cefpirome or cefoperazone with vancomycin against enterococci and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 29:25-30.
19. Sieradzki, K., R. B. Roberts, S. W. Haber, and A. Tomasz. 1999. The development of vancomycin resistance in a patient with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 340:517-523[Free Full Text].
20. Simon, C., and M. Simon. 1991. In vitro activity of flomoxef and cefazolin in combination with vancomycin. Infection 19:276-278[CrossRef].
21. Sugiura, A., K. Jono, T. Kono, and E. Higaside. 1991. The effect of combination of cefotiam and other antibiotics on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in vitro. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 28:707-717[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Tenover, F. C., M. V. Lancaster, B. C. Hill, C. D. Steward, S. A. Stocker, G. A. Hancock, C. M. O'Hara, S. K. McAllister, N. C. Clark, and K. Hiramatsu. 1998. Characterization of staphylococci with reduced susceptibilities to vancomycin and other glycopeptides. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:1020-1027[Abstract/Free Full Text].
23. Wong, S. S., P. L. Ho, P. C. Woo, and K. Y. Yuen. 1999. Bacteremia caused by staphylococci with inducible vancomycin heteroresistance. Clin. Infect. Dis. 29:760-767[Medline].
24. Wong, S. S., T. Ng, W. Yam, D. N. Tsang, P. C. Woo, S. K. Fung, and K. Yune. 2000. Bacteremia due to Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 36:261-268[CrossRef][Medline].


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2001, p. 1292-1294, Vol. 45, No. 4
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.4.1292-1294.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Renzoni, A., Barras, C., Francois, P., Charbonnier, Y., Huggler, E., Garzoni, C., Kelley, W. L., Majcherczyk, P., Schrenzel, J., Lew, D. P., Vaudaux, P. (2006). Transcriptomic and Functional Analysis of an Autolysis-Deficient, Teicoplanin-Resistant Derivative of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 3048-3061 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Vignaroli, C., Biavasco, F., Varaldo, P. E. (2006). Interactions between Glycopeptides and {beta}-Lactams against Isogenic Pairs of Teicoplanin-Susceptible and -Resistant Strains of Staphylococcus haemolyticus.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 2577-2582 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Domenech, A., Ribes, S., Cabellos, C., Taberner, F., Tubau, F., Dominguez, M. A., Montero, A., Linares, J., Ariza, J., Gudiol, F. (2005). Experimental study on the efficacy of combinations of glycopeptides and {beta}-lactams against Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides. J Antimicrob Chemother 56: 709-716 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cui, L., Ma, X., Sato, K., Okuma, K., Tenover, F. C., Mamizuka, E. M., Gemmell, C. G., Kim, M.-N., Ploy, M.-C., El Solh, N., Ferraz, V., Hiramatsu, K. (2003). Cell Wall Thickening Is a Common Feature of Vancomycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 5-14 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Van Der Zwet, W. C., Debets-Ossenkopp, Y. J., Reinders, E., Kapi, M., Savelkoul, P. H. M., Van Elburg, R. M., Hiramatsu, K., Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C. M. J. E. (2002). Nosocomial Spread of a Staphylococcus capitis Strain with Heteroresistance to Vancomycin in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 2520-2525 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kim, M.-N., Hwang, S. H., Pyo, Y.-J., Mun, H.-M., Pai, C. H. (2002). Clonal Spread of Staphylococcus aureus Heterogeneously Resistant to Vancomycin in a University Hospital in Korea. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 1376-1380 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aritaka, N.
Right arrow Articles by Hiramatsu, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aritaka, N.
Right arrow Articles by Hiramatsu, K.