Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2001, p. 1292-1294, Vol. 45, No. 4
Department of Bacteriology, Juntendo
University, Tokyo, Japan
Received 12 April 2000/Returned for modification 7 June
2000/Accepted 18 January 2001
We tested the combined activity of vancomycin and seven Mu3 (ATCC 700698) is a
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain
with heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin, designated heterogeneously
vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (hetero-VRSA) (8, 12, 13). Here VRSA is equivalent to vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (22); the difference in meaning between "intermediate" and "resistant" derives from the NCCLS definition of a MIC of 8 µg/ml as intermediate, while in other locations, the breakpoints are
lower (e.g., "resistant" is used for MICs of To screen clinical S. aureus isolates for hetero-VRSA
strains, we proposed a plating efficiency test on brain heart infusion (BHI) agar containing 4 µg of vancomycin/ml (12).
Strains yielding countable numbers of colonies on the plate by plating,
about 107 CFU, are considered candidates for
hetero-VRSA. Confirmation of a heterogeneous susceptible pattern by
subsequent population analysis and by the derivation test of resistant
mutants (with a MIC of Researchers earlier noticed a property of Mu3, an antagonistic
phenomenon between vancomycin and The 1.0-ml BHI broth (Difco, Detroit, Mich.) containing various
concentrations of vancomycin (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 µg/ml) and
To test the effect of Figure 1A shows that addition of
ampicillin in the concentration range of 0.01 to 1 µg/ml helped Mu3
cells grow in an otherwise inhibitory concentration of vancomycin (4 µg/ml). There was an optimal ampicillin concentration within the
range of antagonism that elicited maximum cell growth beyond an
OD578 of 1.7. The optimal concentration for
antagonism (OCA) was thus defined from the OD curve (with a procedure
illustrated in Fig. 1A) as the concentration of
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.4.1292-1294.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Combination Effect of Vancomycin and
-Lactams
against a Staphylococcus aureus Strain,
Mu3, with Heterogeneous Resistance to Vancomycin
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
-lactam
antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus clinical
strain Mu3, which displays heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin. When combined with vancomycin, four of the seven tested
-lactams
exhibited an additive effect at or near their MICs, while all showed an antagonistic effect at lower, sub-MIC levels. This study implicated the
unpredictable nature of combination therapy of
-lactams and vancomycin against S. aureus with reduced susceptibility
to vancomycin.
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
8 µg/ml in Great Britain and
4 µg/ml in Japan). We define a hetero-VRSA strain as an
S. aureus strain that satisfies all of the following
criteria. (i) Its vancomycin MIC is less than 8 µg/ml when determined
by NCCLS-based broth dilution methods. (ii) It contains subpopulations of cells resistant to higher concentrations of vancomycin, including 4 µg of vancomycin/ml. (iii) Mutant strains with increased vancomycin resistance (a MIC of
8 µg/ml) can be obtained from the strain by
one-step vancomycin-selection procedure with a frequency of 1 in
1,000,000 or greater (12).
8 µg/ml) is required for the final
identification of hetero-VRSA (12).
-lactam antibiotics, when they
were searching for an effective combination therapy against infection
caused by Mu3-like MRSA strains (11). The antagonism was
demonstrated as a thick growth of Mu3 cells around the paper disks that
were impregnated with
-lactam antibiotics and placed on the above
screening agar (11). In the present study, we adopted a
broth dilution method to better quantify the antagonistic phenomenon between vancomycin and
-lactam antibiotics observed on the screening agar plate.
-lactam antibiotics (0 to 1,024 µg/ml) was inoculated with 107 CFU of Mu3. Tested
-lactams were
oxacillin, ampicillin, cefoxitin, cefmetazole (Sigma Chemical Co., St.
Louis, Mo.); penicillin G (Meiji Pharmacy Co., Tokyo, Japan);
piperacillin (Toyama Pharmacy Co., Toyama, Japan); and imipenem (Banyu
Pharmacy Co., Tokyo, Japan). The optical density at 578 nm
(OD578) of the cultures after a 24-h incubation
at 37°C was measured using a U-3200 spectrophotometer (Hitachi Inc.,
Tokyo, Japan), and expressed as "OD curves" after smoothing using
Kaleidagraph (version 3.0.5; Synergy Software, Reading, Pa.).
Correlation coefficients were calculated with a simple regression
analysis program (StatView version 4.11; Abacus Concepts, Inc,
Berkeley, Calif.).
-lactam on the cell wall synthesis, test tubes
holding 5 ml each of BHI broth with 4 µg of vancomycin/ml plus varied
concentrations of
-lactam antibiotics ranging from 0 to 1,000 µg/ml were prepared. To them were added Mu3 cells to a final cell
density of 3 × 10 7 CFU/ml and 8 µl of
[14C]GlcNAc (1.48 MBq/ml; Amersham Life
Science, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, England). The tube
preparations were then incubated at 37°C with shaking. A 0.5-ml
portion of the culture was taken from each test tube after 0, 1, 2, and
3 h of incubation and was subjected to the measurement of
incorporated radioactivity as described previously (8).
-lactam that allows
cells to grow to the highest opacity in the presence of inhibitory
concentrations of vancomycin. On the other hand, a slight additive
effect was observed at higher ampicillin concentrations of 8 and 16 µg/ml, which corresponded to one-fourth and one-half of the MIC
against Mu3 (Table 1). Antagonism similar
to that demonstrated with ampicillin in Fig. 1A was observed with all
seven tested
-lactams, although the range of concentrations
eliciting antagonism and the OCA varied considerably among them (Table
1). The additive effect demonstrated with ampicillin was observed with
four of the seven tested
-lactams at concentrations near their MICs.
Table 1 summarizes the ranges of concentrations eliciting either
antagonism or an additive effect for each antibiotic and shows that the
OCA of each antibiotic was considerably less than the MIC of the
antibiotic against Mu3. On the other hand, the OCA for
-lactam with
Mu3 was very close to the MIC of each
-lactam against the
methicillin-susceptible S. aureus type strain FDA 209P (ATCC
6538P): there was a significant correlation between the OCA for Mu3 and
the MIC for FDA 209P (correlation coefficient = 0.994, P < 0.0001).

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
The effect of ampicillin on the growth and peptidoglycan
synthesis of Mu3 in the presence of vancomycin. (A) Growth of Mu3 cells
in 4 µg of vancomycin/ml and various concentrations of ampicillin.
Turbidity of the culture was monitored after 24-h incubation at 37°C.
The concentration of a
-lactam that makes the cell grow to maximum
opacity in 4 µg of vancomycin/ml is defined as the OCA of the
-lactam. (B) Ampicillin reverses vancomycin-mediated suppression of
peptidoglycan synthesis of Mu3. Uptake of
[14C]N-acetyl-D-glucosamine by
Mu3 cells was measured in the broth containing 4 µg of vancomycin/ml
with and without various concentrations of ampicillin. Symbols: empty
circles, no antibiotic; solid circles, 4 µg of vancomycin/ml alone;
other symbols, 4 µg of vancomycin/ml plus ampicillin. Ampicillin
concentrations in micrograms per milliliter were 0.001 (open
triangles), 0.01 (solid triangles), 0.1 (empty squares), 1 (solid
squares), 10 (empty diamonds), 100 (solid diamonds), and 1,000 (crosses). CPM, counts per minute.
TABLE 1.
-Lactam in combination with vancomycin elicits both
additive and antagonistic effects against Mu3, depending on
the concentration
Figure 1B shows the uptake of
N-acetyl-D-1-14C-glucosamine
([14C]GlcNAc) by Mu3 cells, a major precursor
nutrient of cell wall peptidoglycan synthesis. Vancomycin at 4 µg/ml
suppressed GlcNAc uptake to less than 17% of that with the drug-free
control throughout the measured period. In the copresence of
ampicillin, however, there was a significant recovery of uptake at the
range of ampicillin concentration between 0.1 and 10 µg/ml, and
maximum recovery was observed at 1 µg/ml. These values coincided well
with the antagonism-eliciting concentrations of ampicillin (Fig. 1A).
The reversal of vancomycin-mediated suppression was also demonstrated
within the range of antagonistic concentrations for each of the seven
-lactam antibiotics (not shown).
We and others have reported isolation of Mu3-like hetero-VRSA strains
from clinical specimens (6, 9, 12, 23, 24) which are
sometimes associated with infections that were refractory to vancomycin
therapy (9, 12, 23, 24). Whether such cases could be or
should be treated with vancomycin plus a
-lactam combination is a
focus of argument (9). Besides Mu3, we have tested 20 such
hetero-VRSA clinical isolates obtained from 10 hospitals in Japan for
the antagonism between selected
-lactam antibiotics and vancomycin:
all showed antagonism OD curves and OCAs similar to those demonstrated
with Mu3 (N. Aritaka, unpublished observation).
Currently, the mechanism for
-lactam-elicited antagonism or the
reversal of vancomycin-mediated suppression of cell wall synthesis is
unknown. These observations may indicate existence of a novel sub-MIC
effect of
-lactam antibiotics, inducing activation of cell wall
synthesis of S. aureus. It has been demonstrated recently
that
-lactams can induce expression of certain cell wall
synthesis-associated genes, such as pbp2, in S. aureus (17). Recently, we have also found that
-lactams induce increased transcription of a response regulator
gene, vraR, which is considered to be at least partially
responsible for the increased vancomycin resistance in Mu3
(16). Therefore, it seems plausible to postulate that
-lactams induce activation of cell wall synthesis of Mu3 cells. If
we consider that the induction is triggered upon saturation by
-lactams of the intrinsic set of S. aureus
penicillin-binding proteins, the reason why OCA values are close to the
MICs of
-lactams for S. aureus type strain FDA 209P would
be explained. An alternative and equally attractive explanation for the
antagonism is that
-lactams act by reducing cross-linking of
peptidoglycan of Mu3. Reduced cross-linking increases the number of
D-alanyl-D-alanine residues
in the cell wall, which serve as "false targets" of vancomycin (11). More false targets trap and consume more vancomycin
molecules within the cell wall layers, preventing efficient access of
vancomycin molecules to their "real target," lipid II, on the
cytoplasmic membrane.
There have been many contradictory observations with regard to the
combination effect of vancomycin and
-lactam against S. aureus clinical isolates, including additive and/or synergistic effects (2, 4, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21) and antagonistic effects (7, 9, 14; H. Hanaki, S. Ohkawa, Y. Inaba, T. Hashimoto, and K. Hiramatsu, Abstr. 38th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,
abstr. C-132, 1998; this study). With Mu3, both additive and
antagonistic effects were seen at high and low concentrations of
-lactams, respectively. However, the additive concentrations (
128
µg/ml) (Table 1) are likely difficult to achieve in patients for most
of the tested
-lactam antibiotics. The exception was ampicillin,
which is known to have relatively high antimicrobial activity against
MRSA among extant
-lactam antibiotics as long as
-lactamase is
countered (1, 3). (Ampicillin per se has potent activity
against Mu3, because it does not produce penicillinase.) In terms of
clinical application, however, both the additive and antagonistic
ranges of concentration of ampicillin are achievable in patients for
various time periods, which makes the prediction of the clinical effect
of the combination difficult. We are concerned, therefore, that
-lactam antibiotics may not provide a significant advantage in
combination with vancomycin against Mu3-like hetero-VRSA strains.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by the Core University Program under the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), coordinated by the University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Medicine, and Universiti Sains Malaysia, School of Medical Sciences; by Specially Designated Research Promotion of Monbusho; by a Grant for International Health Cooperation Research (11-C) from the Ministry of Health and Welfare; and also by a nonrestricted research grant from Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, N.J.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Bacteriology, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 113-8421. Phone: 81-3-5802-1040. Fax: 81-3-5684-7830. E-mail: hiram{at}med.juntendo.ac.jp.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Asada, K.,
Y. Inaba,
E. Tateda-Suzuki,
K. Kuwahara-Arai,
T. Ito, and K. Hiramatsu.
1995.
Evolution and resistance expression of MRSA. Evaluation of -lactam antibiotics against a set of isogenic strains with different types of phenotypic expression.
Acta Biochim. Pol.
42:517-524[Medline].
|
| 2. | Barr, J. G., E. T. Smyth, and G. M. Hogg. 1990. In vitro antimicrobial activity of imipenem in combination with vancomycin or teicoplanin against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 9:804-809[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. |
Chambers, H. F., and M. Sachdeva.
1990.
Binding of -lactam antibiotics to penicillin-binding proteins in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Infect. Dis.
161:1170-1176[Medline].
|
| 4. |
Climo, W. M.,
R. L. Patron, and G. L. Archer.
1999.
Combinations of vancomycin and -lactams are synergistic against staphylococci with reduced susceptibilities to vancomycin.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:1747-1753 |
| 5. |
Georgopapadakou, N. H., and F. Y. Liu.
1980.
Penicillin-binding proteins in bacteria.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
18:148-157 |
| 6. |
Guerin, F.,
A. Buu-Hoi,
J. L. Mainardi,
G. Kac,
N. Colardelle,
S. Vaupre,
L. Gutmann, and I. Podglajen.
2000.
Outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides in a Parisian hospital.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:2985-2988 |
| 7. | Hanaki, H., Y. Inaba, K. Sasaki, and K. Hiramatsu. 1998. A novel method of detecting Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin (hetero-VRSA). Jpn. J. Antibiot. 51:521-530[Medline]. (In Japanese.) |
| 8. |
Hanaki, H.,
K. Kuwabara-Arai,
S. Boyle-Vavra,
R. S. Daum,
H. Labischinski, and K. Hiramatsu.
1998.
Activated cell-wall synthesis is associated with vancomycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strains Mu3 and Mu50.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
42:199-209 |
| 9. |
Haraga, I.,
S. Nomura, and A. Nagayama.
1999.
The effects of vancomycin and -lactam antibiotics against vancomycin low-level or intermediately resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
N. Engl. J. Med.
341:1624-1625 |
| 10. |
Hartman, B. J., and A. Tomasz.
1984.
Low-affinity penicillin-binding protein associated with -lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Bacteriol.
158:513-516 |
| 11. | Hiramatsu, K. 1998. Vancomycin resistance in staphylococci. Drug Resist. Updates 1:135-150. |
| 12. | Hiramatsu, K., N. Aritaka, H. Hanaki, S. Kawasaki, Y. Hosoda, S. Hori, Y. Fukuchi, and I. Kobayashi. 1997. Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin. Lancet 350:1670-1673[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. |
Hiramatsu, K.,
H. Hanaki,
T. Ino,
K. Yabuta,
T. Oguri, and F. C. Tenover.
1997.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
40:135-136 |
| 14. |
Howe, R. A.,
M. Wootton,
P. M. Bennett,
A. P. MacGowan, and T. R. Walsh.
1999.
Interactions between methicillin and vancomycin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains displaying different phenotypes of vancomycin susceptibility.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:3068-3071 |
| 15. |
Komatsuzawa, H.,
J. Suzuki,
M. Sugai,
Y. Miyake, and H. Suginaka.
1994.
Effect of combination of oxacillin and non -lactam antibiotics on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
33:1155-1163 |
| 16. | Kuroda, M., K. Kuwabara-Arai, and K. Hiramatsu. 2000. Identification of the up- and down-regulated genes in vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains Mu3 and Mu50 by cDNA differential hybridization method. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 269:485-490[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. | Murakami, H., H. Matsumaru, M. Kanamori, H. Hayashi, and T. Ohta. 1999. Cell wall-affecting antibiotics induce expression of a novel gene, drp35, in Staphylococcus aureus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 264:348-351[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. | Seibert, G., D. Isert, N. Klesel, M. Limbert, A. Markus, and E. Schrinner. 1992. The in vitro antibacterial activity of a combination of cefpirome or cefoperazone with vancomycin against enterococci and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 29:25-30. |
| 19. |
Sieradzki, K.,
R. B. Roberts,
S. W. Haber, and A. Tomasz.
1999.
The development of vancomycin resistance in a patient with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.
N. Engl. J. Med.
340:517-523 |
| 20. | Simon, C., and M. Simon. 1991. In vitro activity of flomoxef and cefazolin in combination with vancomycin. Infection 19:276-278[CrossRef]. |
| 21. |
Sugiura, A.,
K. Jono,
T. Kono, and E. Higaside.
1991.
The effect of combination of cefotiam and other antibiotics on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in vitro.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
28:707-717 |
| 22. |
Tenover, F. C.,
M. V. Lancaster,
B. C. Hill,
C. D. Steward,
S. A. Stocker,
G. A. Hancock,
C. M. O'Hara,
S. K. McAllister,
N. C. Clark, and K. Hiramatsu.
1998.
Characterization of staphylococci with reduced susceptibilities to vancomycin and other glycopeptides.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:1020-1027 |
| 23. | Wong, S. S., P. L. Ho, P. C. Woo, and K. Y. Yuen. 1999. Bacteremia caused by staphylococci with inducible vancomycin heteroresistance. Clin. Infect. Dis. 29:760-767[Medline]. |
| 24. | Wong, S. S., T. Ng, W. Yam, D. N. Tsang, P. C. Woo, S. K. Fung, and K. Yune. 2000. Bacteremia due to Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 36:261-268[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |