Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2001, p. 1431-1437, Vol. 45, No. 5
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.5.1431-1437.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Mechanism and Suppression of Lysostaphin Resistance
in Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Michael W.
Climo,1,2,*
Kerstin
Ehlert,3 and
Gordon L.
Archer1,4
Departments of
Medicine1 and
Microbiology/Immunology,4 Virginia
Commonwealth University Health System, and Hunter Holmes
McGuire Veteran Affairs Medical Center,2
Richmond, Virginia, and PH-Research Antiinfectives I, Bayer
AG, D42096 Wuppertal, Germany3
Received 23 October 2000/Returned for modification 21 December
2000/Accepted 13 February 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The potential for the development of resistance in
oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ORSA) to
lysostaphin, a glycylglycine endopeptidase produced by
Staphylococcus simulans biovar staphylolyticus, was examined in vitro and in an in vivo model of infection. Following in vitro exposure of ORSA to subinhibitory concentrations of
lysostaphin, lysostaphin-resistant mutants were idenitifed among all
isolates examined. Resistance to lysostaphin was associated with a loss of resistance to
-lactams and a change in the muropeptide
interpeptide cross bridge from pentaglycine to a single glycine.
Mutations in femA, the gene required for incorporation of
the second and third glycines into the cross bridge, were found
following PCR amplification and nucleotide sequence analysis.
Complementation of lysostaphin-resistant mutants with pBBB31, which
encodes femA, restored the phenotype of oxacillin
resistance and lysostaphin susceptibility. Addition of
-lactam
antibiotics to lysostaphin in vitro prevented the development of
lysostaphin-resistant mutants. In the rabbit model of experimental
endocarditis, administration of a low dose of lysostaphin for 3 days
led predictably to the appearance of lysostaphin-resistant ORSA mutants
in vegetations. Coadministration of nafcillin with lysostaphin
prevented the emergence of lysostaphin-resistant mutants and led to a
mean reduction in aortic valve vegetation counts of 7.5 log10 CFU/g compared to those for untreated controls and
eliminated the isolation of lysostaphin-resistant mutants from aortic
valve vegetations. Treatment with nafcillin and lysostaphin given alone
led to mean reductions of 1.35 and 1.65 log10 CFU/g
respectively. In ORSA, resistance to lysostaphin was associated with
mutations in femA, but resistance could be suppressed by
the coadministration of
-lactam antibiotics.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Lysostaphin, a 27-kDa endopeptidase
produced by Staphylococcus simulans, has potent
antistaphylococcal activity (7, 11, 12, 13, 22, 23, 24, 25,
30). In previous experiments we have demonstrated that
lysostaphin is highly active against both oxacillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus (ORSA) and
vancomycin-intermediate-susceptible S. aureus (VISA)
(4, 19). In the rabbit model of endocarditis caused by
either ORSA or VISA strains, treatment with lysostaphin reduced mean
aortic valve vegetation counts by >8.0 log10 CFU/g compared to those for untreated controls (4, 19). No
lysostaphin-resistant mutants were found in infected vegetations
following treatment with high doses of lysostaphin. However,
lysostaphin-resistant mutants can easily be selected in vitro when
S. aureus is exposed to low concentrations of lysostaphin
(30).
Resistance to lysostaphin has previously been described among ORSA
strains with alterations in the formation of the pentaglycine cross
bridge (26). Current evidence suggests that the
pentaglycine cross bridge is formed in S. aureus under the
control of three separate genes. fmhB encodes a protein
factor responsible for the addition of the first glycine to the
-amino group of lysine of the stem peptide and appears to be an
essential gene (21, 29). femA and
femB encode factors that catalyze the successive addition of
the second through fifth glycines (1, 9, 14, 17).
femA null mutants generated by either chemical mutagenesis or transposon insertion develop resistance to lysostaphin as well as a
hypersusceptibility to
-lactam antibiotics associated with the
formation of a cross bridge composed entirely of monoglycines instead
of the normal pentaglycines (6, 26). Lysostaphin, which
acts as a glycylglycine endopeptidase, is unable to cleave the cross
bridge of femA null mutants. Although these femA
null mutants were selected by chemical mutagenesis, we hypothesized that the resistance that develops following exposure of S. aureus to low (subinhibitory) concentrations of lysostaphin could
also be caused by the selection of femAB mutants
In the study described here we sought to systematically assess the
development of lysostaphin resistance in ORSA exposed to low doses of
the enzyme both in vitro and in vivo and its relationship to FemAB
activity. In addition, we wanted to find out if the hypersusceptibility of lysostaphin-resistant mutants to
-lactam antibiotics could be
exploited to both prevent resistance and generate synergistic activity
when both lysostaphin and
-lactams were administered in combination.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains and plasmids.
The ORSA isolates tested
were taken from the collection maintained at the Medical College of
Virginia campus of Virginia Commonwealth University as described
previously (2). Mu3, a vancomycin-heteroresistant ORSA
strains and Mu50, a VISA, ORSA strain, were the kind gift of K. Hiramatsu (15, 27). The femA-expressing plasmid
pBBB31, a low-copy-number plasmid containing the entire femA
gene complex and promoter, was the kind gift of B. Berger-Bächi
(1). For complementation experiments, pBBB31 was
introduced into the lysostaphin-resistant strains by transduction with
phage 80
, as described previously (3).
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
MICs were determined
by the broth microdilution method in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton
broth (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.) according to NCCLS
standards (18). Lysostaphin MICs were determined in the
presence of 0.1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma) to prevent the
adsorption of lysostaphin to polystyrene microtiter wells, as described
previously (4). The MIC was the lowest concentration of
antibiotic that yielded no visible growth after incubation at 37°C
for 24 h.
Checkerboard synergy testing was performed by the microdilution method
in microtiter trays with cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth.
Combinations of lysostaphin and oxacillin were tested at concentrations
of 0.015 to 16 and 0.125 to 512 µg/ml, respectively. Microtiter
plates were incubated at 37°C and read at 24 and 48 h. The
fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index was calculated by
adding the FICs (MIC of drug A in combination with drug B/MIC of drug A
alone) of lysostaphin and oxacillin. An FIC index of
0.5 was defined
as synergy, an FIC index of >0.5 to 4.0 was defined as additive or
indifferent, and an FIC index of >4.0 was defined as antagonism. The
checkerboard test results represent the averages of duplicate tests.
Lysostaphin-resistant mutants were generated following overnight
incubation in Mueller-Hinton broth containing one-quarter to one-half
the MIC of lysostaphin, as determined by broth microdilution testing.
Following overnight incubation at 37°C, bacteria were plated on
Mueller-Hinton agar containing lysostaphin (8 µg/ml). The frequency
of resistance development was defined as the number of colonies growing
on lysostaphin-containing agar divided by the number of colonies
growing on Mueller-Hinton agar containing no antibiotics.
Growth curve assays were performed in 50 ml of cation-adjusted
Mueller-Hinton broth inoculated with the test organisms at a starting
concentration of 5 × 105 CFU/ml. Lysostaphin was used at a
concentration (0.03 µg/ml) that represents the MIC and one-half the
MIC for test organsims 27615 and 27285, respectively. Oxacillin was
used at a concentration of 1 µg/ml. Bacterial counts were enumerated
at 0, 1, 4, and 24 h by plating 0.1-ml aliquots of serial 10-fold
dilutions onto Mueller-Hinton agar containing no antibiotics, 8 µg of
lysostaphin per ml, or 6 µg of oxacillin per ml.
Experimental infection.
The rabbit model of aortic valve
endocarditis, as described previously (20), was used to
evaluate antibiotic treatment regimens. Seventy-two hours after
transcarotid placement of a polyethylene catheter across the aortic
valve, rabbits were injected intravenously through the marginal ear
vein with 1 ml of an overnight culture containing 107 CFU
of the test organism, ORSA 27619 (4, 5, 19). Blood samples
for culture were obtained 24 h later and the rabbits were randomly
assigned to either one of the following treatment groups: lysostaphin
(AMBI, Tarrytown, N.J.) given at 1 mg/kg of body weight intravenously
(i.v.) twice a day (BID), lysostaphin given at 1 mg/kg i.v. BID plus
nafcillin (Bristol-Meyer Squibb, Princeton, N.J. given at 200 mg/kg
intramuscularly (i.m.) BID, or no treatment (control group). For
comparison, treatment groups were compared to rabbits receiving
nafcillin at 200 mg i.m. three times a day (TID), which has been tested
previously (5). This dose has previously been shown to be
ineffective in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to
oxacillin-resistant S. aureus 27619, and as such the data
from the previous series are presented for comparison. Surviving
animals were killed by i.v. administration of pentobarbital after a
total of 3 days of antibiotic treatment. Rabbits with negative blood
cultures at 24 h were excluded from subsequent analysis. To reduce the
possibility of antibiotic carryover, rabbits were not killed until at
least 18 h after administration of the last antimicrobial dose.
The heart and kidneys were removed aseptically from each rabbit. Aortic
valve vegetations were removed from each rabbit's heart and weighed,
and serial dilutions of vegetation homogenates were made. Kidneys were
examined, and areas of abscess or infarct were removed, weighed,
homogenized in saline, and serially diluted. Tissue homogenates were
also plated onto Mueller-Hinton agar containing lysostaphin (16 µg/ml) in order to screen for resistant subpopulations. Cultures were
read after 48 h. Titers of bacteria were expressed as
log10 CFU per gram of vegetation or kidney tissue. Sterile
vegetation and kidney cultures contained
2 and
1 log10
CFU/g, respectively (the limit of detection).
Inclusion criteria.
For the final analysis, animals that
fulfilled the following criteria were included: (i) positive blood
culture at 24 h, (ii) survival for at least 24 h of antibiotic
treatment, (iii) proper placement of the catheter across the aortic
valve at necropsy with macroscopic evidence of aortic valve
endocarditis (visible vegetations), and (iv) aortic valve vegetation
and kidney tissue that yielded pure cultures of the test organism.
Statistical analysis.
The mean numbers of bacteria per gram
of vegetation and kidney tissue in all treatment groups were compared
by analysis of variance. Sterile aortic valve and kidney cultures were
entered as 2 and 1 log10 CFU/g, respectively (the limit of
detection). The Student-Newman-Keuls test was used to adjust for
multiple comparisons. For analysis of the sterilization of tissue
cultures, we used Fisher's exact test. A P value of <0.05
was considered statistically significant for all tests.
Analysis of muropeptide composition.
Isolated cell walls
were prepared as described previously (26). Lyophilized
peptidoglycan was digested with mutanolysin (Sigma), and the resulting
muropeptides were reduced into their muramitol derivatives. Separation
of muropeptides was achieved by reversed-phase high-pressure liquid
chromatography with a Waters 626 system and the conditions described
previously (26). Muropeptides were detected at 206 nm.
DNA sequencing.
The entire femA structural gene
and sequences 327 bp 5' to the structural gene region of each strain
were amplified by PCR with the following primers:
5'-AAATCTAACACGCGTGAGG-3' and
5'-TATCCAAGTTGTGAACAACC-3'. The nucleotide sequences of
femA were determined by direct sequencing of specific
amplified PCR products obtained from genomic template DNA prepared with
the Genomic Qiagen-tip kit (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif.). Sequencing of
the PCR fragments was performed by the dideoxy chain termination
procedure on an ABI 1377 automatic sequencer with the ABI PRISM Dye
Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready reaction kit with Ampli-Taq DNA
polymerase FS (Perkin-Elmer, Applied Biosystems Division, Foster,
Calif.).
 |
RESULTS |
Development of lysostaphin resistance and antimicrobial
susceptibilities of lysostaphin-resistant mutants.
Overnight
incubation in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of
lysostaphin (one-quarter to one-half the MIC) selected for
lysostaphin-resistant mutants among all oxacillin-resistant S. aureus strains tested (Table 1). The
frequency of resistance development ranged between 5.3 × 10
1 and 1.0 × 10
7. All resistant
mutants had decreased susceptibility to lysostaphin, with lysostaphin
MICs ranging from 2 to 512 µg/ml (5- to 15-fold increases) by broth
microdilution testing. Resistance to lysostaphin was associated with a
loss of resistance to oxacillin among all mutants. In all cases,
oxacillin resistance was abolished upon establishment of the
lysostaphin resistance phenotype, with oxacillin MICs decreasing from
16 to 1,024 µg/ml to 0.25 to 1 µg/ml, representing 5- to 11-fold
decreases in oxacillin susceptibility (Table 1).
The reversion to the oxacillin susceptible phenotype among
lysostaphin-resistant mutants suggested that coadministration of
-lactams with lysostaphin could prevent the development of
lysostaphin-resistant mutants. We examined this possibility in growth
curve experiments, the results of which presented in Fig. 1 and 2.
In tests with the two oxacillin-resistant S. aureus strains,
27615 (Fig. 1A) and 27287 (Fig. 1B) in
the presence of lysostaphin (at the MIC and one-half the MIC,
respectively), lysostaphin inhibited growth for 6 h, but the
development of lysostaphin-resistant mutants was seen by 24 h, with
frequencies of resistance of 2.5 × 10
2 for ORSA
27615 and 3.3 × 10
5 for ORSA 27287. Coadministration of oxacillin at a concentration of 1 µg/ml
completely abolished the development of lysostaphin-resistant mutants.
Testing of three additional ORSA strains (strains 450M, 27285, and
27223) demonstrated results identical to those described above, with
the complete suppression of the development of lysostaphin-resistant mutants following overnight incubation in lysostaphin (0.03 to 0.06 µg/ml) and oxacillin (1 to 5 µg/ml), while incubation in the
presence of lysostaphin alone led to the development of resistant mutants among all strains tested. The suppression of lysostaphin resistance by oxacillin was dose dependent. For the majority of strains
(strains 450M, 27615, and 27285), complete suppression of
lysostaphin-resistant mutants could be achieved with oxacillin at 1 µg/ml. In tests with ORSA 27223, complete suppression of lysostaphin-resistant mutants was achieved with the coadministration of
oxacillin at 5 µg/ml (Fig. 2). At this
concentration, there were still viable lysostaphin-susceptible cells at
24 h, but growth in the presence of oxacillin at 10 µg/ml and
lysostaphin at 0.0625 µg/ml resulted in complete sterilization of the
culture (Fig. 2B).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Influence of oxacillin on the development of
lysostaphin-resistant mutants. Growth curves are for ORSA 27615 and
ORSA 27287 grown in the presence of no antibiotics, lysostaphin, or the
combination of lysostaphin (0.03 µg/ml) and oxacillin (1 µg/ml).
The frequencies of lysostaphin-resistant mutants identified after
24 h of incubation are shown in parentheses. OD 600, optical
density at 600 nm.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Influence of oxacillin on the development of
lysostaphin-resistant mutants. The growth curve for ORSA 27223 is shown
in panel A (OD 600, optical density at 600 nm), with the corresponding
time kill curve shown in panel B. , ORSA 27223, no antibiotics; ,
lysostaphin only at 0.0625 µg/ml; , lysostaphin at 0.0625 µg/ml
plus oxacillin at 5 µg/ml; , lysostaphin at 0.0625 µg/ml plus
oxacillin at 10 µg/ml.
|
|
Results of microdilution checkerboard testing demonstrated significant
synergy with the combination of oxacillin and lysostaphin in tests with
all strains used in growth curve experiments, with FIC indices ranging
between 0.009 and 0.3125 (data not shown). Similar results were seen
with a number of other
-lactams including ceftriaxone, ceftazidime,
and cefazolin (data not shown).
Development and suppression of lysostaphin resistance in vivo.
In previous experiments, we were unable to document the presence of
lysostaphin-resistant mutants following a 3-day treatment trial of ORSA
endocarditis in the rabbit model of experimental aortic valve
endocarditis (4). As the doses of lysostaphin used in
these experiments were large and a majority of vegetations were
sterile, we hypothesized that lysostaphin-resistant mutants might be
able to develop with exposure to lower doses of lysostaphin. Using the
rabbit model of experimental endocarditis, we treated rabbits with
lower doses of lysostaphin and screened for the development of
lysostaphin-resistant mutants among the surviving bacterial populations
in aortic valve vegetations. Following the establishment of
endocarditis with the ORSA strain 27619, rabbits were treated for 3 days with lysostaphin at 1 mg/kg i.v. BID, a dose substantially lower
than that tested previously (5 to 15 mg/kg/day). The rabbits were also
treated with the combination of lysostaphin (1 mg/kg i.v. BID) and
nafcillin (200 mg/kg i.m. BID) to examine the effect of
-lactam
exposure on the development of lysostaphin-resistant mutants. Animals
were also compared to those that have received treatment with nafcillin
alone given at a dose of 200 mg/kg i.m. TID, which was previously shown
to be ineffective in the treatment of ORSA 27619 (5).
The results were similar to those seen in the in vitro experiments.
Lysostaphin-resistant mutants could be demonstrated in five of seven
rabbits exposed to lower doses of lysostaphin (Table 2). The frequency of resistance among
vegetation material ranged from 0 to 1.3 × 10
6. No
lysostaphin-resistant mutants could be demonstrated among rabbits
treated with the combination of lysostaphin and nafcillin. In addition,
the rabbits treated with the lysostaphin-nafcillin combination had mean
log10 vegetation counts (2.52 ± 1.89 CFU/g) significantly lower than those for lysostaphin-treated rabbits (8.40 ± 1.22 CFU/g) or controls (10.05 ±0.88 CFU/g)
(P < 0.05). The mean reduction in bacterial counts
compared to those for the controls of 7.53 log 10 CFU/g is comparable
to those seen in previous tests with lysostaphin given at 15 mg/kg/day
(8.5 log 10 CFU/g) (4).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Treatment of experimental ORSA endocarditis with
lysostaphin and nafcillin and the development of lysostaphin resistance
|
|
The oxacillin susceptible phenotype was seen among all
lysostaphin-resistant mutants harvested from vegetation material.
Further testing was completed with one of these lysostaphin-resistant mutants, designated 27619B (a mutant derived in vivo). Pulsed-field gel
electrophoresis confirmed that 27619B was identical to the parent
strain, 27619. Lysostaphin resistance was again associated with a loss
of oxacillin resistance (oxacillin MIC, 0.5 µg/ml; lysostaphin MIC, 2 µg/ml) in 27619B.
Muropeptide compositions of lysostaphin-resistant mutants.
The
peptidoglycan compositions of several lysostaphin-resistant mutants
were analyzed and compared to those of the parent strains. The
five strains analyzed included 27619, 27619LR (derived by passsge),
27619B (derived in vivo), Mu50, and Mu50LR (derived by passage).
Whereas lysostaphin-susceptible strain 27619 showed the normal
bell-shaped staphylococcal muropeptide pattern and contained a large
amount of highly cross-linked wall material and the
pentaglycine-modified muropeptide M4 as the main monomeric species, the
patterns of lysostaphin-resistant mutant 27619LR derived in vitro and
mutant 27619B derived in vivo showed reductions in the amounts of
highly cross-linked wall material. Concomitantly, the
monoglycine-substituted muropeptide M2 was the main monomeric species
(Fig. 3). Furthermore, the peptidoglycan
composition analysis of lysostaphin-resistant mutant Mu50LR (derived by
passage) also revealed monoglycine interpeptide bridges instead of
pentaglycine bridges (data not shown). The results of the muropeptide
analysis for all lysostaphin-resistant mutants were similar to those
seen among previously described femA null mutants (6,
26).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Muropeptide patterns of parent strain 27619 and
lysostaphin-resistant mutants 27619LR (derived by passage) and 27619B
(derived in vivo). The main monomeric peaks containing pentaglycine or
monoglycine cross bridges are indicated as M4 and M2, respectively (for
muropeptide nomenclature, see reference 25).
|
|
Complementation.
The formation of a muropeptide composed of
monoglycine cross bridges, which generates lysostaphin resistance, has
previously been reported following the inactivation of femAB
(6, 26). To test this hypothesis several
lysostaphin-resistant mutants were complemented with
femA-carrying plasmid pBBB31. pBBB31 is a low-copy-number
plasmid that contains the entire femA gene under the control
of its own promoter. Following the introduction of pBBB31 into
lysostaphin-resistant mutants 27619LR and 27619B, both strains regained
the phenotype of lysostaphin susceptibility and oxacillin resistance,
identical to that of parent strain 27619.
Sequence analysis and locations of femA mutations in
lysostaphin-resistant mutants.
The DNAs of four
lysostaphin-resistant mutants were sequenced to determine if there were
any abnormalities in the femAB gene. They included three
mutants derived in vitro (mutants 450MLR, 27615LR, and 27169LR) and
mutant 27619B derived in vivo. No differences in the predicted amino
acid sequences of FemB were seen for any of the isolates. The
nucleotide sequences of the femA and femB structural genes of 450MLR were identical to those of 450M. However, the putative Shine-Dalgarno region had a 1-bp change. The remaining three isolates had changes within the femA gene. Strain
27619LR had a 4-bp substitution after base pair 890, which introduced a
premature translational termination at amino acid 301. Strain 27615LR
had a 1-bp deletion that caused a premature translational termination
of FemA at amino acid 138. Strain 27169B demonstrated a 6-bp deletion
of nucleotides 151 to 156 that caused a two-amino-acid deletion and a
one-amino-acid change without premature translational termination
(50N51E52V
50I).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Lysostaphin is a potent staphylolytic agent with activity against
both oxacillin-resistant and -susceptible S. aureus strains as well VISA strains. As a glycylglycine endopeptidase, lysostaphin cleaves between the second and third glycines of the pentaglycine cross
bridge of all S. aureus strains. We have previously
demonstrated that lysostaphin is an effective treatment for
experimental aortic valve endocarditis due to ORSA and VISA (4,
19). However, the activity of lysostaphin could be compromised
by the development of resistance, an issue that has been incompletely
addressed in the past.
In the study described in this report, we demonstrate that resistance
to lysostaphin can occur both in vitro and in an in vivo model of
infection following prolonged exposure to low concentrations of
lysostaphin. Following overnight incubation in the presence of one-half
the MIC of lysostaphin, ORSA isolates developed mutants with reduced
susceptibility to lysostaphin at frequencies ranging from 5.3 × 10
1 to 1.0 × 10
7. Resistance to
lysostaphin in mutants derived both in vitro and in vivo was associated
with three characteristics: increased susceptibility to
-lactams,
mutations in femA, and an altered muropeptide structure in
which the normal pentaglycine cross bridges were replaced with a single glycine.
These results are not unexpected. Previous work has shown that
alterations in the femAB operon, which affects the glycine content of the muropeptide cross bridge, have a direct impact on
lysostaphin susceptibility. Current evidence suggests that the
pentaglycine cross bridge is formed in S. aureus under the control of three separate genes, fmhB, femA, and
femB, that encode factors that catalyze the successive
addition of five glycines. femA null mutants generated by
either chemical mutagenesis or transposon insertion have the same
antimicrobial phenotype (lysostaphin resistance, oxacillin
susceptibility) and cell wall structure seen among the
lysostaphin-resistant mutants generated in the present study
(26). In the present study, demonstrated alterations in
femA included mutations that lead to premature translational termination as well as alterations in the putative Shine-Dalgrano site
that may have altered transcription (mutant 450MLR). Both of these
alterations have been described with mutants obtained by chemical
mutagenesis (26). In mutant 27619B, there was an alteration in amino acids 49 to 51. This may be the first documentation of a functional domain of FemA since complementation with pBBB31, which
encodes an intact femA, restored lysostaphin susceptibility as well as oxacillin resistance. The femAB gene products
continue to be potentially attractive targets for chemotherapeutic
inactivation since alterations in femAB induce increased
sensitivity to
-lactam antibiotics in S. aureus (8,
16).
Resistance to lysostaphin in the present study appeared to be due only
to alterations in the activity of FemA and not to other alterations of
cross-bridge formation, as determined by the ability of femA
complementation to restore the wild-type phenotype. The incorporation
of increased amounts of amino acids other than glycine into the cross
bridge can also confer resistance to lysostaphin. Among the
coagulase-negative staphylcocci, serine and alanine are often found in
the cross bridge, explaining the decreased susceptibility to
lysostaphin in these species. In S. simulans, the organism
that produces lysostaphin, the presence of the lif (lysostaphin immunity factor) gene causes the incorporation of increased amounts of serine into the third and fifth positions of the
cross bridge, protecting itself against the lytic action of lysostaphin
(10, 28). epr, found in Staphylococcus
capitis, produces changes in the cross bridge identical to those
produced by the lif gene. lif and epr
both have high degrees of homology to femA and
femB, and recent evidence indicates that they act together
with femA to increase the level of incorporation of serine into the cross bridge (10).
In the present study, resistance to lysostaphin emerged both in vitro
and in vivo following exposure to the enzyme. This resistance development was easily circumvented by the coadministration of
-lactam antibiotics. There are several possible explanations for
this observation. First, there could be selective killing of developing
lysostaphin-resistant mutants that emerge due to their
hypersusceptibility to
-lactam antibiotics. The
-lactam hypersusceptibility in these femA mutants has not yet been
explained, although it has been speculated that PBP 2a has a substrate
requirement which does not include muropeptides that contain the
monoglycine cross bridges seen in femA mutants. PBP 2a, a
penicillin-binding protein (PBP) with a low affinity for
-lactams,
must perform cell wall transpeptidation activity following exposure of
staphylococci to
-lactams when the remaining four PBPs are
inactivated. However, PBP 2a appears to have a specific requirement for
pentaglycine muropeptide monomers for efficient cross-linking to occur.
In the setting of lysostaphin resistance due to alterations in
femA, only monomeric muropeptides with a single glycine are
available for cross-linking, and these are poor transpeptidation
substrates for PBP 2a. Second, exposure to
-lactams could cause
increased levels of activation and transcription of the
femAB operon, reducing the probability of spontaneous
femA mutations. An increased level of femAB
transcription has been observed following oxacillin-induced growth (A. Rosato and G. L. Archer, unpublished data). Finally, the
combination of lysostaphin and
-lactams appears to be synergistic, a
phenomenon that appears to be independent of the development of
lysostaphin resistance. This synergism was demonstrated in both broth
microdilution checkerboard tests and the rabbit model of experimental
aortic valve endocarditis. In the rabbit model of experimental
endocarditis due to ORSA 27619, treatment with either lysostaphin or
nafcillin alone was associated with a modest reduction in the mean
log10 vegetation counts compared to those for the controls
(1.65 and 1.39 log10 CFU/g, respectively). In contrast, the
combination of lysostaphin and nafcillin resulted in a mean reduction
in vegetation counts of 7.5 log10 CFU/g. This reduction is
similar to those seen in previous trials with lysostaphin alone, even
though a much lower dose was used in the present study (2 versus 15 mg/kg/day). These data suggest that therapeutic trials with lysostaphin
should include nafcillin or oxacillin to both supress resistance
development and promote synergy.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by NIH STTR grant R-41HL60334.
We thank Geri Hale Cooper, Elizabeth Hanners, and Katrina Williams for
expert assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: McGuire Veterans
Affairs Medical Center, 1201 Broad Rock Blvd., Section 111-C, Richmond, VA 23249. Phone: (804) 675-5018. Fax: (804) 675-5437. E-mail: Michael.Climo{at}med.va.gov.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Berger-Bächi, B.,
L. Berberis-Maino,
A. Strässle, and F. H. Kayser.
1989.
femA, a host-mediated factor essential for methicllin resistance in Staphylocccus aureus: molecular cloning and characterization.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
219:263-269[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Climo, M. W.,
R. L. Patron, and G. L. Archer.
1999.
Combinations of vancomycin and -lactams are synergistic against staphylococci with reduced susceptibilities to vancomycin.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:1747-1753[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Climo, M. W.,
V. Sharma, and G. L. Archer.
1996.
Identification and characterization of the origin of conjugal transfer (oriT) and a gene (nes) encoding a single-stranded endonuclease on the staphylococcal plasmid pGO1.
J. Bacteriol.
178:4975-4983[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Climo, M. W.,
R. L. Patron,
B. P. Goldstein, and G. L. Archer.
1998.
Lysostaphin treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus aortic valve endocarditis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:1355-1360[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Climo, M. W.,
S. M. Markowitz,
D. S. Williams,
C. G. Hale-Cooper, and G. L. Archer.
1997.
Comparison of in-vitro and in-vivo efficacy of FK037, vancomycin, imipenem and nafcillin against staphylococcal species.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
40:59-66[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
de Jonge, B. L. M.,
T. Sidow,
Y. Chang,
H. Labischinski,
B. Berger-Bächi,
D. A. Gage, and A. Tomasz.
1993.
Altered muropeptide composition in Staphylococcus aureus strains with an inactivated femA locus.
J. Bacteriol.
175:2779-2782[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Dixon, R. E.,
J. S. Goodman, and M. G. Koenig.
1968.
Lysostaphin: an enzymatic approach to staphylococcal disease. III. Combined lysostaphin-oxacillin therapy of established staphylococcal abscesses in mice.
Yale J. Biol. Med.
41:62-68[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Ehlert, K.
1999.
Methicillin-resistance in Staphylococcus aureus molecular basis, novel targets and antibiotic therapy.
Curr. Pharm. Dev.
5:45-55.
|
| 9.
|
Ehlert, K.,
W. Schröder, and H. Labischinski.
1997.
Specificities of FemA and FemB for different glycine residues: FemB cannot substitute for FemA in staphylococcal peptidoglycan pentaglycine side chain formation.
J. Bacteriol.
179:7573-7576[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Ehlert, K.,
M. Tschierske,
C. Mori,
W. Schröder, and B. Berger-Bächi.
2000.
Site-specific serine incorporation by Lif and Epr into positions 3 and 5 of the staphylococcal petidoglycan interpeptide bridge.
J. Bacteriol.
182:2635-2638[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Goldberg, L. M.,
J. M. DeFranco,
C. Watanakunakorn, and M. Hamburger.
1967.
Studies in experimental staphylococcal endocarditis in dogs. VI. Treatment with lysostaphin, p. 45-53.
. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1966.
|
| 12.
|
Harrison, E. F., and C. B. Cropp.
1967.
Therapeutic activity of lysostaphin in experimental staphylococcal infections.
Can. J. Microbiol.
13:93-97.
|
| 13.
|
Harrison, E. F., and W. A. Zygmunt.
1967.
Lysostaphin in experimental renal infections.
J. Bacteriol.
93:520-524[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Henze, U.,
T. Sidow,
J. Wecke,
H. Labischinski, and B. Berger-Bächi.
1993.
Influence of femB on methicillin resistance and peptidoglycan metabolism in Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Bacteriol.
175:1612-1620[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Hiramatsu, K.,
H. Hanaki,
T. Ino,
K. Yabuta,
T. Oguru, and F. C. Tenover.
1997.
Oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
40:135-146[Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Kopp, U.,
M. Roos,
J. Wecke, and H. Labischinski.
1996.
Staphylococcal petidoglycan interpeptide bridge biosynthesis: a novel antistaphylococcal target?
Microb. Drug Resist.
2:29-41[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Maidhof, H.,
B. Reinicke,
P. Blümel,
B. Berger-Bächi, and H. Labischinski.
1991.
femA, which encodes a factor essential for expression of methicillin resistance, affects glycine content of peptidoglycan in methicllin-resistant and oxacillin-susceptible Staphyloccoccus aureus strains.
J. Bacteriol.
73:3506-3513.
|
| 18.
|
National Commitee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
1997.
Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility test for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard M7-A4, 4th ed.
national committee for clinical laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
|
| 19.
|
Patron, R. L.,
M. W. Climo,
B. P. Goldstein, and G. L. Archer.
1999.
Lysostaphin treatment of experimental aortic valve endocarditis caused by a Staphylococcus aureus isolate with reduced susceptibtility to vancomycin.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:1754-1755[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Perlman, B. B., and L. R. Freedman.
1971.
Experimental endocarditis. II. Staphylococcal infection of the aortic valve following placement of a polyethylene catheter in the left side of the heart.
Yale J. Biol. Med.
44:206-213[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Rohrer, S.,
K. Ehlert,
M. Tschierske,
H. Labischinski, and B. Berger-Bächi.
1999.
The essential Staphylococcus aureus gene fmhB is involved in the first step of peptidoglycan pentaglycine interpeptide formation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:9351-9356[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Schaffner, W.,
M. A. Melly, and M. G. Koenig.
1967.
Lysostaphin: an enzymatic approach to staphylococcal disease. II. In vivo studies.
Yale J. Biol. Med.
39:230-244[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Schaffner, W.,
M. A. Melly,
J. H. Hash, and M. G. Koenig.
1967.
Lysostaphin: an enzymatic approach to staphylococcal disease. I. In vitro studies.
Yale J. Biol. Med.
39:215-229[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Schuhardt, V. T., and C. A. Schindler.
1964.
Lysostaphin therapy in mice infected with Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Bacteriol.
88:815-816[Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Stark, F. R.,
C. Thornsvard,
E. P. Flannery, and M. S. Artenstein.
1974.
Systemic lysostaphin in man. Apparent antimicrobial activity in a neutropenic patient.
N. Engl. J. Med.
291:239-240.
|
| 26.
|
Stranden, A. M.,
K. Ehlert,
H. Labischinski, and B. Berger-Bächi.
1997.
Cell wall monoglycine cross-bridges and methicillin hypersusceptibility in a femAB null mutant of methicllin-resistant Staphyloocccus aureus.
J. Bacteriol.
179:9-16[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Tenover, F. C.,
M. V. Lancaster,
B. C. Hill,
C. D. Steward,
S. A. Stocker,
G. A. Hancock,
C. M. O'Hara,
N. C. Clark, and K. Hiramatsu.
1998.
Characterization of staphylococci with reduced susceptibilities to vancomycin and other glycopeptides.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:1020-1027[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Tschierske, M.,
K. Ehlert,
A. M. Stranden, and B. Berger-Bachi.
1997.
Lif, the lysostaphin immunity factor, complements FemB in staphylococcal peptidoglycan interpeptide bridge formation.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
153:261-264[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Tschierske, M.,
C. Mori,
S. Rohrer,
K. Ehlert,
K. Shaw, and B. Berger-Bächi.
1999.
Identification of three additional femAB-like open reading frames in Staphylococcus aureus.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
171:97-102[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Zygmunt, W., and P. A. Tavormina.
1972.
Lysostaphin: model for a specific enzymatic approach to infectious disease.
Prog. Drug Res.
16:309-333[Medline].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2001, p. 1431-1437, Vol. 45, No. 5
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.5.1431-1437.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Kokai-Kun, J. F., Chanturiya, T., Mond, J. J.
(2007). Lysostaphin as a treatment for systemic Staphylococcus aureus infection in a mouse model. J Antimicrob Chemother
60: 1051-1059
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Oluola, O., Kong, L., Fein, M., Weisman, L. E.
(2007). Lysostaphin in Treatment of Neonatal Staphylococcus aureus Infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
51: 2198-2200
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Graham, S., Coote, P. J.
(2007). Potent, synergistic inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus upon exposure to a combination of the endopeptidase lysostaphin and the cationic peptide ranalexin. J Antimicrob Chemother
59: 759-762
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kusuma, C., Jadanova, A., Chanturiya, T., Kokai-Kun, J. F.
(2007). Lysostaphin-Resistant Variants of Staphylococcus aureus Demonstrate Reduced Fitness In Vitro and In Vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
51: 475-482
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yang, X.-Y., Li, C.-R., Lou, R.-H., Wang, Y.-M., Zhang, W.-X., Chen, H.-Z., Huang, Q.-S., Han, Y.-X., Jiang, J.-D., You, X.-F.
(2007). In vitro activity of recombinant lysostaphin against Staphylococcus aureus isolates from hospitals in Beijing, China. J Med Microbiol
56: 71-76
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kusuma, C. M., Kokai-Kun, J. F.
(2005). Comparison of Four Methods for Determining Lysostaphin Susceptibility of Various Strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 3256-3263
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Koehl, J. L., Muthaiyan, A., Jayaswal, R. K., Ehlert, K., Labischinski, H., Wilkinson, B. J.
(2004). Cell Wall Composition and Decreased Autolytic Activity and Lysostaphin Susceptibility of Glycopeptide-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 3749-3757
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wu, J. A., Kusuma, C., Mond, J. J., Kokai-Kun, J. F.
(2003). Lysostaphin Disrupts Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilms on Artificial Surfaces. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 3407-3414
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
von Eiff, C., Kokai-Kun, J. F., Becker, K., Peters, G.
(2003). In Vitro Activity of Recombinant Lysostaphin against Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Anterior Nares and Blood. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 3613-3615
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kokai-Kun, J. F., Walsh, S. M., Chanturiya, T., Mond, J. J.
(2003). Lysostaphin Cream Eradicates Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Colonization in a Cotton Rat Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 1589-1597
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kerr, D. E., Wellnitz, O.
(2003). Mammary expression of new genes to combat mastitis. J ANIM SCI
81: 38-47
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kiri, N., Archer, G., Climo, M. W.
(2002). Combinations of Lysostaphin with {beta}-Lactams Are Synergistic against Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
46: 2017-2020
[Abstract]
[Full Text]