This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doern, G. V.
Right arrow Articles by Brueggemann, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doern, G. V.
Right arrow Articles by Brueggemann, A. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2001, p. 1721-1729, Vol. 45, No. 6
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.6.1721-1729.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Antimicrobial Resistance among Clinical Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States during 1999-2000, Including a Comparison of Resistance Rates since 1994-1995

Gary V. Doern,* Kristopher P. Heilmann, Holly K. Huynh, Paul R. Rhomberg, Stacy L. Coffman, and Angela B. Brueggemann

Medical Microbiology Division, Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242

Received 20 December 2000/Returned for modification 14 February 2001/Accepted 19 March 2001


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

A total of 1,531 recent clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae were collected from 33 medical centers nationwide during the winter of 1999-2000 and characterized at a central laboratory. Of these isolates, 34.2% were penicillin nonsusceptible (MIC >=  0.12 µg/ml) and 21.5% were high-level resistant (MIC >=  2 µg/ml). MICs to all beta-lactam antimicrobials increased as penicillin MICs increased. Resistance rates among non-beta-lactam agents were the following: macrolides, 25.2 to 25.7%; clindamycin, 8.9%; tetracycline, 16.3%; chloramphenicol, 8.3%; and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), 30.3%. Resistance to non-beta-lactam agents was higher among penicillin-resistant strains than penicillin-susceptible strains; 22.4% of S. pneumoniae were multiresistant. Resistance to vancomycin and quinupristin-dalfopristin was not detected. Resistance to rifampin was 0.1%. Testing of seven fluoroquinolones resulted in the following rank order of in vitro activity: gemifloxacin > sitafloxacin > moxifloxacin > gatifloxacin > levofloxacin = ciprofloxacin > ofloxacin. For 1.4% of strains, ciprofloxacin MICs were >= 4 µg/ml. The MIC90s (MICs at which 90% of isolates were inhibited) of two ketolides were 0.06 µg/ml (ABT773) and 0.12 µg/ml (telithromycin). The MIC90 of linezolid was 2 µg/ml. Overall, antimicrobial resistance was highest among middle ear fluid and sinus isolates of S. pneumoniae; lowest resistance rates were noted with isolates from cerebrospinal fluid and blood. Resistant isolates were most often recovered from children 0 to 5 years of age and from patients in the southeastern United States. This study represents a continuation of two previous national studies, one in 1994-1995 and the other in 1997-1998. Resistance rates with S. pneumoniae have increased markedly in the United States during the past 5 years. Increases in resistance from 1994-1995 to 1999-2000 for selected antimicrobial agents were as follows: penicillin, 10.6%; erythromycin, 16.1%; tetracycline, 9.0%; TMP-SMX, 9.1%; and chloramphenicol, 4.0%, the increase in multiresistance was 13.3%. Despite awareness and prevention efforts, antimicrobial resistance with S. pneumoniae continues to increase in the United States.


    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Antimicrobial resistance with Streptococcus pneumoniae was first recognized in 1917, when optochin (ethylhydrocupreine) was used to treat infections caused by S. pneumoniae, and resistance developed while patients were on therapy (13). Fifty years later, the first isolate of penicillin-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae of recognized clinical significance (MIC = 0.5 µg/ml) was recovered in Australia (9). In the United States, the first report of infection due to a non-penicillin-susceptible isolate of S. pneumoniae (MIC = 0.25 µg/ml) was in 1974. The patient had pneumococcal meningitis and did not respond to penicillin therapy, even when high doses of this agent were administered (15).

Antimicrobial resistant S. pneumoniae became widespread in many parts of the world during the 1980s (13). In the United States, however, resistance first became manifest during the early part of the decade of the 1990s. During the 1980s two national surveillance studies revealed overall penicillin resistance rates in the United States to be at levels of 3 to 5%, and importantly, where resistance was observed, it was typically only of the intermediate level (11, 24). By 1991-1992, however, overall penicillin resistance rates (intermediate plus resistant [I + R]) had jumped to 17.8% in the United States (27).

A national surveillance study conducted in 1994-1995 with 30 United States medical centers reported S. pneumoniae overall penicillin resistance at 23.6%; multiresistance was 9.1% (5). In 1997-1998, this surveillance project was repeated, with 24 of the 1994-1995 medical centers participating plus an additional 10 centers. Results of the 1997-1998 study indicated that overall rates of penicillin resistance had increased to 29.5% and the rate of multiresistance was 16.0% (6). The present report describes the results of a third surveillance project, performed in 1999-2000. This study included 33 of the 34 centers participating in the 1997-1998 study. Twenty-two medical centers have been participants in all three national surveillance studies, which provides an opportunity for evaluation of resistance rates among a common group of medical centers over a 5-year period of time in the United States.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Unique patient isolates of S. pneumoniae were collected in each of 33 United States medical center microbiology laboratories from November 1, 1999, through April 30, 2000. Fifty consecutive S. pneumoniae isolates were requested from each medical center. At the study centers, pure cultures of S. pneumoniae were propagated on 5% sheep blood agar plates, the growth was transferred to a rayon swab, and the swab was placed in a transport tube containing 12 ml of semisolid Ames transport medium with charcoal (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, Md.). Swabs were mailed overnight to the University of Iowa College of Medicine. Only isolates judged by the submitting laboratories as being of clinical significance were included. Demographic data sheets were completed by the contributing medical center and submitted along with every isolate. The following information was obtained: patient medical record number, age, sex, service (inpatient or outpatient), specimen date, and specimen source. Upon receipt at the University of Iowa, isolates were subcultured and isolate identification was verified using conventional criteria. Stock cultures were made using a porous bead system (ProLab Diagnostics, Inc., Austin, Tex.) and stored at -70°C.

Susceptibility testing was performed following the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) guidelines explicitly (16). Broth microdilution trays were made in-house using Mueller-Hinton broth plus 3% lysed horse blood and were stored at -70°C until use. Thirty-two antimicrobial agents were tested: penicillin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, cefpodoxime, cefixime, cefprozil, cefaclor, loracarbef, cefditoren, cefdinir, clarithromycin, erythromycin, azithromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), rifampin, vancomycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, sitafloxacin, moxifloxacin, ABT773, telithromycin, and linezolid. Drug powders were obtained from their manufacturers or Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo.). S. pneumoniae isolates were subcultured twice before susceptibility testing was performed. Broth microdilution trays were inoculated with approximately 5 × 105 CFU of organism/ml (final concentration; 100-µl final volume per well) and incubated for 24 h at 35°C in ambient air before MICs were visually determined.


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The in vitro activities of 32 antimicrobial agents against 1,531 S. pneumoniae isolates are presented in Table 1. Resistance rates are listed for antimicrobials with NCCLS-approved pneumococcal susceptibility breakpoints. The NCCLS recently changed the breakpoints for S. pneumoniae of amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and cefuroxime (17). The breakpoints for amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate were shifted by two log2 dilutions (from <= 0.5, 1, >= 2 µg/ml to <= 2, 4, >= 8 µg/ml [susceptible {S}, intermediate {I}, resistant {R}, respectively]). Application of the new breakpoints to the current data resulted in a dramatic reduction in the percentage of resistant strains compared to rates determined based on 1999 breakpoints (18), 24.2% versus 6.3%, for both amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate (Table 1). The breakpoints for cefuroxime were changed by one twofold dilution (from <= 0.5, 1, >= 2 µg/ml to <= 1, 2, >= 4 µg/ml [S, I, R, respectively]). This resulted in a resistance rate of 29.1% when 2000 breakpoints were applied to the current data, versus 27.3% when old breakpoints were applied. In addition, the NCCLS established susceptibility breakpoints for cefpodoxime, cefprozil, cefaclor, loracarbef, and cefdinir, cephalosporins for which S. pneumoniae breakpoints were previously lacking.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   In vitro activities of 32 antimicrobial agents for 1,531 isolates of S. pneumoniae

Of this collection of S. pneumoniae isolates, 34.2% were penicillin nonsusceptible, 12.7% were intermediate (MIC = 0.12 to 1 µg/ml), and 21.5% were penicillin resistant (MIC >=  2 µg/ml) (Table 1). The overall rate of ceftriaxone resistance (I + R) was 24.7%; 14.4% of isolates were resistant. Among the other cephalosporins tested---cefuroxime, cefpodoxime, cefixime, cefprozil, cefaclor, loracarbef, cefditoren and cefdinir---cefditoren was the most active (MIC90 [MIC at which 90% of isolates were inhibited] = 0.5 µg/ml) and loracarbef the least active (MIC90 = 128 µg/ml). When isolates were grouped according to penicillin susceptibility category, consistently highest rates of resistance to all beta-lactam agents were observed among penicillin-resistant strains. For example, 100% of penicillin-susceptible strains were also susceptible to ceftriaxone, 26.3% of penicillin-intermediate strains were intermediate or resistant to ceftriaxone, and 99.4% of all penicillin-resistant strains were ceftriaxone intermediate or resistant. A similar relationship was seen between penicillin and each beta-lactam tested in this study.

Three macrolide agents were examined: erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin. While NCCLS breakpoints differ for each macrolide, the resistance rates (I + R) are virtually identical: 0.5 to 0.9% intermediate and 25.2 to 25.7% resistant for all three macrolides (Table 1). In this collection of S. pneumoniae isolates, 394 (25.7%) were characterized as erythromycin resistant (MICs >=  1 µg/ml); erythromycin MICs were 1 to 32 µg/ml for 262 (66.5%) of these 394 isolates and >= 64 µg/ml for the remaining 132 strains.

Two principal mechanisms of erythromycin resistance are known to exist among isolates of S. pneumoniae: a ribosomal methylase encoded by ermB, and an efflux pump encoded by mefA (10, 20, 21, 22, 25, 28). Generally, strains with the ermB gene have erythromycin MICs of >= 64 µg/ml and clindamycin MICs of >= 8 µg/ml and are also resistant to streptogramin B agents, a phenotype referred to as MLSB. In contrast, mefA-positive strains have erythromycin MICs of 1 to 32 µg/ml and clindamycin MICs of <= 0.25 µg/ml. Table 2 describes the patterns of erythromycin and clindamycin susceptibility for the 394 erythromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates tested in this study. Of 262 strains for which erythromycin MICs were 1 to 32 µg/ml, for 255 (97.3%) clindamycin MICs were <= 0.25 µg/ml. The phenotype of these isolates was consistent with mefA-mediated efflux. For 128 (97.0%) of 132 isolates for which erythromycin MICs were >= 64 clindamycin MICs were >= 8 µg/ml. This profile implies ermB-mediated ribosomal methylation. Only 11 (2.8%) of the total of 394 erythromycin-resistant isolates did not fit one of these two profiles.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   Multiresistancea among S. pneumoniae isolates, 1999-2000

Resistance rates (I + R) to other non-beta-lactam agents tested in this study were as follows: clindamycin, 9.2%; tetracycline, 16.6%; chloramphenicol, 8.3%; and TMP-SMX, 35.9%. Only one strain was resistant to rifampin (MIC > 4 µg/ml), and only one strain was intermediate to quinupristin-dalfopristin (MIC = 2 µg/ml). No vancomycin-resistant strains were detected. The highest vancomycin MIC was 0.5 µg/ml.

Testing of the antimicrobial activities of seven fluoroquinolones against S. pneumoniae resulted in the following overall rank order of activity: gemifloxacin > sitafloxacin > moxifloxacin > gatifloxacin > levofloxacin = ciprofloxacin > ofloxacin. NCCLS breakpoints currently exist for four of the fluoroquinolones tested in this study: ofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin (17). Resistance (I + R) rates were noted to be 5.6, 0.7, 0.4, and 0.3%, respectively. Although there are no NCCLS-approved breakpoints for ciprofloxacin versus S. pneumoniae, Chen and colleagues suggested a ciprofloxacin MIC of >= 4 µg/ml as a criterion for fluoroquinolone resistance based on the association between isolates with a ciprofloxacin MIC of >= 4 µg/ml and mutations in the fluoroquinolone-resistance-determining region of S. pneumoniae, as well as the fact that a ciprofloxacin of MIC >= 4 µg/ml exceeds the usual peak achievable serum level of ciprofloxacin (2). Based on this definition, 1.4% (n = 21) of the current collection of pneumococci were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Also of note is that 6 of these 21 strains had penicillin MICs of >= 2 µg/ml, 6 had penicillin MICs of 0.25 to 1 µg/ml, and the remaining 9 strains were penicillin susceptible. All six with penicillin MICs of >= 2 µg/ml were also multiresistant, with between two and four additional resistances.

Two ketolides were tested, ABT773 (Abbott Pharmaceutical) and telithromycin (Aventis Pharmaceutical). ABT773 was consistently four- to eightfold more active than telithromycin (Table 1). In comparison to penicillin-susceptible strains, the MIC90s of ABT773 and telithromycin increased slightly among penicillin-intermediate (0.06 and 0.12 µg/ml, respectively) and penicillin-resistant (0.25 and 0.5 µg/ml, respectively) strains. These values for penicillin-susceptible strains were 0.015 and 0.015 µg/ml, respectively. NCCLS breakpoints have not yet been established for either of these agents; therefore, rates of resistance were not determined.

The MIC50 of linezolid, an oxazolidinone, was 1 µg/ml, and the MIC90 was 2 µg/ml. No differences were seen when isolates were categorized based on their penicillin susceptibility category. NCCLS breakpoints have not yet been established for this antimicrobial; however, the Food and Drug Administration-approved susceptibility breakpoint included in the package insert is <= 2 µg/ml. Based on this criterion, 100% of S. pneumoniae strains in this study were susceptible to linezolid.

Of this collection of isolates, 22.4% (n = 343) were found to be multiresistant (defined as intermediate or resistant to penicillin plus intermediate or resistant to at least two non-beta-lactam agents) (Table 3). Of the multiresistant strains, 36.4% (n = 125) were resistant to penicillin, erythromycin, and TMP-SMX, 28.6% (n = 98) were resistant to penicillin, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and TMP-SMX, and 23.6% (n = 81) were resistant to penicillin, erythromycin, tetracycline, and TMP-SMX. The remaining 39 isolates (11.4%) exhibited other combinations of three or four resistances.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3.   Recovery of S. pneumoniae strains with intermediate and high levels of resistance, by specimen source and patient characteristics, 1999-2000

Table 4 indicates rates of antimicrobial resistance to selected antimicrobial agents sorted according to selected patient and specimen demographic characteristics. Of the S. pneumoniae isolates in this collection, 65.8% (n = 1,007) were obtained from respiratory specimens (44.5% lower respiratory, 21.3% upper respiratory); 32.1% (n = 491) were invasive isolates recovered from blood, cerebrospinal fluid, or other normally sterile body fluids; 45.4% of upper respiratory specimens, 34.9% of lower respiratory specimens, and 25.9% of invasive isolates were penicillin intermediate or high-level resistant.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4.   Resistance rates of selected antimicrobials by individual study center, 1999-2000

Of the S. pneumoniae isolates collected from children 0 to 5 years of age, 42.5% (n = 190) were penicillin intermediate or high-level resistant, a level 7 to 10% higher than the penicillin resistance rate in any other age category. Rates of penicillin resistance among inpatients (32.3%, n = 278) versus outpatients (36.4%, n = 242) were similar.

Table 5 compares resistance rates of selected antimicrobials by individual study center. Each medical center contributed an average of 46 unique patient isolates (range, 20 to 59 isolates). The frequency with which resistant (I + R) strains were recovered varied considerably between individual study centers: penicillin, 13.8 to 65.9%; ceftriaxone, 5.2 to 56.1%; erythromycin, 6.1 to 53.7%; tetracycline, 7.3 to 50.0%; TMP-SMX, 14.3 to 63.4%; and chloramphenicol, 1.9 to 27.3%. Of the 33 centers, 19 had penicillin resistance rates (I + R) that were lower than the national rate of 34.2%; 14 had rates of penicillin resistance higher than the national rate. Compared by geographic region, penicillin resistance rates (I + R) were as follows: west (five centers), 33.2%; southwest (six centers), 37.3%; midwest (eight centers), 29.3%; northeast (9 centers), 32.2%; and southeast (five centers), 42.9%.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5.   Comparison of three national antimicrobial resistance surveillance studies


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The results of this study indicate that rates of antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae in the United States continue to increase. The current overall national rate of penicillin resistance is 34.2%; 21.5% are high-level resistant (MICs >=  2 µg/ml). Among 329 isolates for which MICs were >= 2 µg/ml, the percentages of organisms for which MICs were 2 and 4 µg/ml were 71.4 and 28.6%, respectively. No isolates for which MICs were >= 8 µg/ml were recognized. When organisms were grouped according to penicillin susceptibility categories, rates of resistance to all beta-lactam agents increased in parallel with penicillin resistance. Penicillin resistance in S. pneumoniae is the result of alterations in cell wall penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs)(8, 23). All beta-lactam antimicrobials, to at least some extent, use essentially the same PBPs as their target of action; therefore, alterations in PBPs that cause resistance to penicillin will result in some degree of resistance to all beta-lactam antimicrobials. Indeed, an absolute linear relationship between penicillin MICs and MICs of eight other beta -lactam antimicrobials has recently been described for a large collection (n = 3,194) of recent S. pneumoniae clinical isolates from the United States (1).

Resistance rates (I + R) among non-beta-lactam agents were the following: macrolides, 26%, clindamycin, 9.2%; tetracycline, 16.6%; chloramphenicol, 8.3%; and TMP-SMX, 35.9%. Rates of resistance to all of these non-beta-lactam antimicrobials were consistently higher among penicillin-intermediate and -resistant S. pneumoniae strains compared to penicillin-susceptible strains.

The phenotypic expression of macrolide resistance in this study indicated that the efflux and MLSB phenotypes remain the dominant mechanisms of resistance among pneumococci in the United States. Organisms in the first group account for approximately 65% of macrolide-resistant isolates; MLSB isolates account for approximately 32%. It is possible that other recently described macrolide resistance determinants are present in those rare strains that do not clearly fit into either of these two phenotypes (26).

Vancomycin and quinupristin-dalfopristin resistance was not detected, and only 0.1% of S. pneumoniae strains were resistant to rifampin. Newer agents such as the ketolides and linezolid were consistently active, even among penicillin-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae isolates.

Multiresistance continues to grow as a problem among S. pneumoniae isolates in the United States. Overall, 22.4% of the S. pneumoniae isolates tested in this study were resistant to at least three different classes of antimicrobials; 28.6% of the multiresistant strains were resistant to five different antimicrobial classes: penicillin, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and TMP-SMX.

Antimicrobial resistance rates were highest among middle ear fluid and sinus isolates, isolates recovered from children <= 5 years of age, and isolates from patients residing in the southeastern United States. Inpatient and outpatient resistance rates were comparable.

The modal MICs of ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, sitafloxacin, and gemifloxacin for the S. pneumoniae isolates characterized in this study were 2, 1, 1, 0.25, 0.12, 0.03, and 0.015 µg/ml, respectively. For 21 strains (1.4%), ciprofloxacin MICs were >= 4 µg/ml. For 11 of these isolates, the ciprofloxacin MICs were 4 µg/ml; the MICs of ofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, sitafloxacin, and gemifloxacin for these 11 isolates were 2 to 16, 1 to 8, 0.25 to 2, 0.12 to 1, 0.06 to 0.25, and 0.03 to 0.12 µg/ml, respectively. For five strains, MICs were as follows: ciprofloxacin, 8 µg/ml; ofloxacin, 4 to 16 µg/ml; levofloxacin, 2 to 8 µg/ml; gatifloxacin, 0.5 to 4 µg/ml; moxifloxacin, 0.25 to 2 µg/ml; sitafloxacin, 0.12 to 0.25 µg/ml; and gemifloxacin, 0.03 to 0.25 µg/ml. Two strains with ciprofloxacin MICs of 16 µg/ml had ofloxacin MICs of 4 and 8 µg/ml, levofloxacin MICs of 2 and 4 µg/ml, gatifloxacin MICs of 1 µg/ml, moxifloxacin MICs of 0.25 µg/ml, sitafloxacin MICs of 0.25 µg/ml, and gemifloxacin MICs of 0.25 µg/ml. For one strain, MICs were as follows: ciprofloxacin, 32 µg/ml; ofloxacin, 32 µg/ml; levofloxacin, 16 µg/ml; gatifloxacin, 4 µg/ml; moxifloxacin, 2 µg/ml; sitafloxacin, 0.25 µg/ml; and gemifloxacin, 0.25 µg/ml. Finally, two strains with ciprofloxacin MICs of >64 µg/ml also had the following MICs: ofloxacin, >64 µg/ml; levofloxacin, 64 µg/ml; gatifloxacin, 16 µg/ml; moxifloxacin, 4 and 8 µg/ml; sitafloxacin, 2 µg/ml; and gemifloxacin, 2 µg/ml.

While overall resistance rates among fluoroquinolones remain at low levels, it is important to note that 6 of the 21 ciprofloxacin-resistant strains in this study were high-level penicillin resistant and multiresistant (resistant to erythromycin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, or TMP-SMX). Four strains had ciprofloxacin MICs of 4 to 8 µg/ml, penicillin MICs of 2 µg/ml, and resistance to two to four additional antimicrobials; two strains had ciprofloxacin MICs of 16 µg/ml, penicillin MICs of 2 to 4 µg/ml, and resistance to two to three additional antimicrobials.

Resistance rates among individual medical centers varied widely. Penicillin resistance (I + R) ranged from 13.8% to 65.9%, and rates of resistance to non-beta-lactam agents varied in a similar manner. Those medical centers with lower rates of penicillin resistance also tended to have lower rates of resistance to other antimicrobial classes, and those centers with the highest rates of penicillin resistance were among the centers with the highest rates of resistance to non-beta-lactam agents.

It is of interest to compare the observations of this study with those of Whitney and colleagues, who recently described the results of a longitudinal population based survey of antimicrobial resistance among invasive isolates of S. pneumoniae from seven large United States metropolitan areas and the State of Connecticut (29). Data were presented for the years 1995 to 1998. Accepting that the period of our study, winter of 1999-2000, was roughly one year more recent than the latest acquisition year of their survey and accepting the fact that their study was much more restricted geographically than ours, there were striking similarities between rates of resistance observed in the two surveys among systemic isolates of S. pneumoniae. For example, resistance rates in our survey and the study conducted by Whitney et al. were 25.8 and 24% with penicillin, 17.5 and 17% with cefotaxime, 18.6 and 17% with erythromycin, 29.1 and 30% with TMP-SMX, 8.1 and 7% with tetracycline, and 4.7 and 3% with chloramphenicol, respectively.

Since the present study is a continuation of a longitudinal surveillance program including two previous national studies, it presents a unique opportunity for comparison of resistance rates from a common group of geographically distributed medical centers over a 5-year period. The number of medical centers in each study was between 30 and 34. Twenty-four medical centers were common to the 1994-1995 and 1997-1998 studies, 32 centers were common to the 1997-1998 and 1999-2000 studies, and 22 medical centers participated in all three studies. The numbers of isolates collected were comparable (1,527 to 1,601), and the isolates were collected during the exact same time period---the winter months between November 1 and April 30. All of the studies were similar with respect to the age distribution of the patients from whom isolates were obtained as well as the proportion of isolates obtained from each specimen source (Table 5).

Penicillin resistance (I + R) increased significantly during the past 5 years in the United States, from 23.6% in 1994-1995 to 34.2% in 1999-2000 (Table 5). Macrolide resistance increased from 10.3% in 1994-1995 to 26.2% in 1999-2000. Clindamycin resistance increased 3.5% between 1997-1998 and 1999-2000 to a current rate of 9.2%. (Clindamycin was not tested in 1994-1995.) Tetracycline resistance has more than doubled, increasing from 7.6% in 1994-1995 to 16.6% in 1999-2000. TMP-SMX resistance has increased 9.1% since 1994-1995, to a current rate of 35.9%. Chloramphenicol resistance doubled, from 4.3% to 8.3% during the past five winter seasons.

The increase in macrolide resistance is of particular interest. In view of the relationship between MICs and resistance mechanisms, i.e., erythromycin MICs of 1 to 32 µg/ml suggest efflux (mefE) while MICs of >= 64 µg/ml imply MLSB as a result of ribosomal methylation (ermB), we were able to assess the contribution of these two resistance determinants to macrolide resistance over time. The relative percentage of macrolide-resistant strains with these two mechanisms did not change during the three studies we have conducted, i.e., 68.1 to 74.7% efflux phenotype in 1994-1995, 1997-1998, and 1999-2000, with 25.3 to 31.9% MLSB phenotype during the same three periods.

In a recent survey of invasive pneumococcal isolates conducted over essentially the same period in the metropolitan Atlanta area, the relative percentage of efflux strains was found to have increased (7). Furthermore, there was a shift during the study period toward higher macrolide MICs with efflux-positive strains (7). Again, we have not observed this. The MIC50s for efflux-positive isolates in our three surveys have all been 4 µg/ml; the MIC90s for such isolates were 16 µg/ml in 1994-1995 and 8 µg/ml in both 1997-1998 and 1999-2000. The differences between our observations and those of Gay et al. (7) might be accounted for by the limited geographic area surveyed in their study and/or the fact that they reported results only for invasive isolates of S. pneumoniae.

Fluoroquinolone resistance with S. pneumoniae in the United States has remained stable during the past 5 years. Using a ciprofloxacin MIC of >= 4 µg/ml as a marker for fluoroquinolone resistance, resistance to ciprofloxacin in the United States has remained unchanged (i.e., 1.2 to 1.6%) during the last 5 years. Current overall fluoroquinolone resistance rates in Canada and the United States are remarkably similar (2). One difference, however, is that fluoroquinolone resistance rates in Canada appear to be changing rapidly, while our study indicates that resistance rates in the United States, as noted above, have remained essentially unchanged over the past 5 years.

Another important observation in this study is that the proportion of high-level penicillin resistant strains present in the United States now exceeds the proportion of penicillin-intermediate strains. Overall, 63% of penicillin-nonsusceptible strains in this study were high-level penicillin resistant, compared to 41% in 1997-1998 (6) and 40% in 1994-1995 (5). This is a startling increase in high-level penicillin resistance within just the past 2 years, but it is even more alarming compared to the resistance rates reported only 8 years ago. In 1991-1992, the overall national rate of penicillin resistance was 17.8%; only 2.6% of resistant isolates were high-level resistant (27). Of particular importance is the observation that the increased proportion of high-level penicillin-resistant isolates was noted in all three major specimen categories: upper respiratory tract, 68.9%; lower respiratory tract, 59.9%; and invasive isolates, 59.8%. While the clinical relevance of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae in lower respiratory tract infections is debatable, there can be no doubt as to the clinical relevance and therapeutic challenge of penicillin resistance---particularly high-level resistance---among isolates causing systemic infections such as meningitis and perhaps other closed-space infections such as sinusitis or otitis media (12, 14, 19).

The rate of multiresistant S. pneumoniae has increased steadily: 9.1% in 1994-1995, 16.0% in 1997-1998, and 22.4% in 1999-2000. In this study, 65.5% of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates were multiresistant. This also differs significantly from previous years. In 1997-1998, 54.0% of penicillin-nonsusceptible strains were multiresistant (P < 0.0001); in 1994-1995, 38.2% of penicillin-nonsusceptible strains were multiresistant (P < 0.0001). It is disconcerting to note that currently one-third of clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae are resistant to penicillin, of which ca. two-thirds are both high-level resistant as well as resistant to two or more non-beta-lactam antimicrobial classes.

One possible explanation for the increase in high-level penicillin resistance and multiresistance is the proliferation of a few major clones of penicillin-resistant or multiresistant strains in the United States. Two separate studies have characterized recent (1994-1995 and 1996-1997) clinical isolates of penicillin-resistant pneumococci at a molecular level to determine whether clonal relationships exist among these resistant organisms (3, 4). Both studies found that 9 to 10 major clones of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae exist in the United States, which together comprise 70 to 85% of the penicillin-resistant pneumococci in the United States (3, 4). The study by Corso and colleagues also determined that the most frequently occurring clone within the collection of 328 S. pneumoniae isolates that they characterized was the 23F clone from Spain, which is also a multiresistant clone (3). We speculate that the substantial increase in resistance rates during such a short period of time is suggestive of further proliferation of a few of these major clones of pneumococci, particularly high-level penicillin-resistant and multiresistant clones. Molecular characterization of the penicillin-resistant isolates from our study is under way and will hopefully provide additional insight into the epidemiology that surrounds the spread of antimicrobial-resistant S. pneumoniae. In conclusion, the problem of antimicrobial resistance with S. pneumoniae in the United States continues to grow.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by a grant from Abbott Laboratories.

We are also grateful to the following individuals and medical centers for providing the isolates of S. pneumoniae characterized in this study: Dale Schwab, San Diego, Calif.; David Bruckner, Los Angeles, Calif.; Mary York, San Francisco, Calif.; David Sewell, Portland, Oreg.; Thomas Fritschie, Seattle, Wash.; Susan Rossmann, Houston, Tex.; Virginia Quenzer, Albuquerque, N.Mex.; Paul Southern, Dallas, Tex.; Michael Wilson, Denver, Colo; Karen Carroll, Salt Lake City, Utah; Michael Saubolle, Phoenix, Ariz.; Gerri Hall, Cleveland, Ohio; Susan Kehl, Milwaukee, Wis.; William Dunne, Detroit, Mich.; Franklin Cockerill, Rochester, Minn.; Gerald Denys, Indianapolis, Ind.; Carmen Clark, Iowa City, Iowa; Melodie Beard, Chicago, Ill.; Richard Thompson, Evanston, Ill.; Joseph Schwartzman, Lebanon, N.H.; Phyllis Della-Latta, New York, N.Y.; Paola DeGirolami, Boston, Mass.; Allan Truant, Philadelphia, Pa. Yvette McCarter, Hartford, Conn.; Joseph Campos, Washington, D.C.; Betty Forbes, Syracuse, N.Y.; Paul Bourbeau, Danville, Pa.; Dwight Hardy, Rochester, N.Y.; Peter Gilligan, Chapel Hill, N.C.; Robert Jerris, Decatur, Ga.; Elliot Carter, Mobile, Ala.; Susan Sharp, Miami Beach, Fla.; and James Snyder, Louisville, Ky.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Medical Microbiology Division, C606 GH, Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242. Phone: (319) 356-8616. Fax: (319) 356-4916. E-mail: gary-doern{at}uiowa.edu.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Brueggemann, A. B., M. A. Pfaller, and G. V. Doem. 2001. Use of penicillin MICs to predict the activity of other beta -lactam antimicrobial agents against Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:367-369[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Chen, D. K., A. McGeer, J. C. De Azavedo, and D. E. Low. 1999. Decreased susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae to fluoroquinolones in Canada. N. Engl. J. Med. 341:233-239[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Corso, A., E. P. Severina, V. F. Petruk, Y. R. Mauriz, and A. Tomasz. 1998. Molecular characterization of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates causing respiratory disease in the United States. Microb. Drug Resist. 4:325-337[Medline].
4. Doern, G. V., A. B. Brueggemann, M. Blocker, M. Dunne, H. P. Holley, Jr., K. S. Kehl, J. Duval, K. Kugler, S. Putnam, A. Rauch, and M. A. Pfaller. 1998. Clonal relationships among high-level penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 27:757-761[Medline].
5. Doern, G. V., A. Brueggemann, H. P. Holley, Jr., and A. M. Rauch. 1996. Antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae recovered from outpatients in the United States during the winter months of 1994 to 1995: results of a 30-center national surveillance study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1208-1213[Abstract].
6. Doern, G. V., A. B. Brueggemann, H. Huynh, E. Wingert, and P. Rhomberg. 1999. Antimicrobial resistance with Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States, 1997-98. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5:757-765[Medline].
7. Gay, K., W. Baughman, Y. Miller, D. Jackson, C. G. Whitney, A. Schuchat, M. M. Farley, F. Tenover, and D. S. Stephens. 2000. The emergence of Streptococcus pneumoniae resistant to macrolide antimicrobial agents: a 6-year population-based assessment. J. Infect. Dis. 182:1417-1424[CrossRef][Medline].
8. Grebe, T., and R. Hakenbeck. 1996. Penicillin-binding proteins 2b and 2x of Streptococcus pneumoniae are primary resistance determinants for different classes of beta -lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:829-834[Abstract].
9. Hansman, D., and M. M. Bullen. 1967. A resistant pneumococcus. Lancet ii:264-265.
10. Johnston, N. J., J. C. DeAzavedo, J. D. Kellner, and D. E. Low. 1998. Prevalence and characterization of the mechanisms of macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin resistance in isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:2425-2426[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Jorgensen, J. H., G. V. Doern, L. A. Maher, A. W. Howell, and J. S. Redding. 1990. Antimicrobial resistance among respiratory isolates of Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:2075-2080[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Kaplan, S. L., and E. O. Mason, Jr. 1998. Management of infections due to antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11:628-644[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Klugman, K. P. 1990. Pneumococcal resistance to antibiotics. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 3:171-196[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Klugman, K. P., and C. Feldman. 1998. The clinical relevance of antibiotic resistance in the management of pneumococcal pneumoniae. Clin. Pulmon. Med. 4:190-193.
15. Naraqui, S., G. P. Kirkpatrick, and S. Kabins. 1974. Relapsing pneumococcal meningitis. Isolation of an organism with decreased susceptibility to penicillin G. J. Pediatr. 85:671-673[CrossRef][Medline].
16. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow anaerobically, 5th ed. Approved standard M7-A5. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
17. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2001. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Tenth informational supplement, M100-S11. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
18. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1999. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Ninth informational supplement, M100-S9. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
19. Pallares, R., J. Linares, M. Vadillo, C. Cabellos, F. Manresa, P. F. Viladrich, R. Martin, and F. Gudiol. 1995. Resistance to penicillin and cephalosporin and mortality from severe pneumococcal pneumonia in Barcelona, Spain. N. Engl. J. Med. 333:474-480[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20. Roberts, M. C., J. Sutcliffe, P. Courvalin, L. B. Jensen, J. Rood, and H. Seppala. 1999. Nomenclature for macrolide and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance determinants. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2823-2830[Free Full Text].
21. Shortridge, V. D., G. V. Doern, A. B. Brueggemann, J. M. Beyer, and R. K. Flamm. 1999. Prevalence of macrolide resistance mechanisms in Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from a multicenter antibiotic resistance surveillance study conducted in the United States in 1994-1995. Clin. Infect. Dis. 29:1186-1188[CrossRef][Medline].
22. Shortridge, V. D., R. K. Flamm, N. Ramer, J. Beyer, and S. K. Tanaka. 1996. Novel mechanism of macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 26:73-78[CrossRef][Medline].
23. Smith, A. M., and K. P. Klugman. 1998. Alterations in PBP 1A essential for high-level penicillin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1329-1333[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24. Spika, J. S., R. R. Facklam, B. D. Plikaytis, M. J. Oxtoby, and the Pneumococcal Surveillance Working Group. 1991. Antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States, 1979-1987. J. Infect. Dis. 163:1273-1278[Medline].
25. Sutcliffe, J., A. Tait-Kamradt, and L. Wondrack. 1996. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes resistant to macrolides by sensitive to clindamycin: a common resistance pattern mediated by an efflux system. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1817-1824[Abstract].
26. Tait-Kamradt, A., T. Davies, P. C. Appelbaum, F. Depardieu, P. Courvalin, J. Petitpas, L. Wondrack, A. Walker, M. R. Jacobs, and J. Sutcliffe. 2000. Two new mechanisms of macrolide resistance in clinical strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Eastern Europe and North America. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:3395-3401[Abstract/Free Full Text].
27. Thornsberry, C., S. D. Brown, Y. C. Yee, S. K. Bouchillon, J. K. Marler, and T. Rich. 1993. Increasing penicillin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States. Suppl. Infect. Med. 93:15-24.
28. Waites, K., C. Johnson, B. Gray, K. Edwards, M. Crain, and W. Benjamin, Jr. 2000. Use of clindamycin disks to detect macrolide resistance mediated by ermB and mefE in Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from adults and children. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1731-1734[Abstract/Free Full Text].
29. Whitney, C. G., M. M. Farley, J. Hadler, L. H. Harrison, C. Lexau, A. Reingold, A. L. Lefkowitt, P. R. Cieslak, M. Cetron, E. R. Zell, J. H. Jorgensen, and A. Schuchat. 2000. Increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 343:1917-1924[Abstract/Free Full Text].


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2001, p. 1721-1729, Vol. 45, No. 6
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.6.1721-1729.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Hoffman, O., Weber, J. R. (2009). Review: Pathophysiology and treatment of bacterial meningitis. Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders 2: 401-412 [Abstract]  
  • Owens, R. C. Jr., Shorr, A. F. (2009). Rational dosing of antimicrobial agents: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic strategies. Am J Health Syst Pharm 66: S23-S30 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lahti, E, Peltola, V, Waris, M, Virkki, R, Rantakokko-Jalava, K, Jalava, J, Eerola, E, Ruuskanen, O (2009). Induced sputum in the diagnosis of childhood community-acquired pneumonia. Thorax 64: 252-257 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Starr, J. A., Fox, G. W., Clayton, J. K. (2008). Streptococcus pneumoniae: An Update on Resistance Patterns in the United States. Journal of Pharmacy Practice 21: 363-370 [Abstract]  
  • Lawrence, L., Danese, P., DeVito, J., Franceschi, F., Sutcliffe, J. (2008). In Vitro Activities of the Rx-01 Oxazolidinones against Hospital and Community Pathogens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 1653-1662 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zhanel, G. G., DeCorby, M., Laing, N., Weshnoweski, B., Vashisht, R., Tailor, F., Nichol, K. A., Wierzbowski, A., Baudry, P. J., Karlowsky, J. A., Lagace-Wiens, P., Walkty, A., McCracken, M., Mulvey, M. R., Johnson, J., The Canadian Antimicrobial Resistance Alliance (CA, , Hoban, D. J. (2008). Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens in Intensive Care Units in Canada: Results of the Canadian National Intensive Care Unit (CAN-ICU) Study, 2005-2006. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 1430-1437 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Karageorgopoulos, D. E. MD, Giannopoulou, K. P. MD, Grammatikos, A. P. MD MSc, Dimopoulos, G. MD, Falagas, M. E. MD DSc (2008). Fluoroquinolones compared with {beta}-lactam antibiotics for the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. CMAJ 178: 845-854 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Balsalobre, L., de la Campa, A. G. (2008). Fitness of Streptococcus pneumoniae Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Strains with Topoisomerase IV Recombinant Genes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 822-830 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gums, J. G, Boatwright, D W., Camblin, M., Halstead, D. C, Jones, M. E, Sanderson, R. (2008). Differences Between Ceftriaxone and Cefotaxime: Microbiological Inconsistencies. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 42: 71-79 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Critchley, I. A., Brown, S. D., Traczewski, M. M., Tillotson, G. S., Janjic, N. (2007). National and Regional Assessment of Antimicrobial Resistance among Community-Acquired Respiratory Tract Pathogens Identified in a 2005-2006 U.S. Faropenem Surveillance Study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 4382-4389 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Calatayud, L., Ardanuy, C., Cercenado, E., Fenoll, A., Bouza, E., Pallares, R., Martin, R., Linares, J. (2007). Serotypes, Clones, and Mechanisms of Resistance of Erythromycin-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates Collected in Spain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 3240-3246 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Grandgirard, D., Schurch, C., Cottagnoud, P., Leib, S. L. (2007). Prevention of Brain Injury by the Nonbacteriolytic Antibiotic Daptomycin in Experimental Pneumococcal Meningitis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 2173-2178 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Harrell, L. J., Sharps, S. K., Bean, R. A., Reller, L. B. (2007). Genetic Relatedness of Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates from Paired Blood and Respiratory Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 2017-2019 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Izdebski, R., Sadowy, E., Fiett, J., Grzesiowski, P., Gniadkowski, M., Hryniewicz, W. (2007). Clonal Diversity and Resistance Mechanisms in Tetracycline-Nonsusceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates in Poland. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 1155-1163 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sadowy, E., Izdebski, R., Skoczynska, A., Grzesiowski, P., Gniadkowski, M., Hryniewicz, W. (2007). Phenotypic and Molecular Analysis of Penicillin-Nonsusceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates in Poland. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 40-47 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Abgueguen, P., Azoulay-Dupuis, E., Noel, V., Moine, P., Rieux, V., Fantin, B., Bedos, J.-P. (2007). Amoxicillin Is Effective against Penicillin-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Strains in a Mouse Pneumonia Model Simulating Human Pharmacokinetics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 208-214 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Butler, M. M., LaMarr, W. A., Foster, K. A., Barnes, M. H., Skow, D. J., Lyden, P. T., Kustigian, L. M., Zhi, C., Brown, N. C., Wright, G. E., Bowlin, T. L. (2007). Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Action of a Novel Anilinouracil-Fluoroquinolone Hybrid Compound. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 119-127 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ardanuy, C., Fenoll, A., Berron, S., Calatayud, L., Linares, J., the Spanish Pneumococcal Infection Study Network, (2006). Increase of the M Phenotype among Erythromycin-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates from Spain Related to the Serotype 14 Variant of the Spain9V-3 Clone.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 3162-3165 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wickman, P. A., Black, J. A., Moland, E. S., Thomson, K. S. (2006). In Vitro Activities of DX-619 and Comparison Quinolones against Gram-Positive Cocci.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 2255-2257 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fukuda, Y., Yanagihara, K., Higashiyama, Y., Miyazaki, Y., Hirakata, Y., Mukae, H., Tomono, K., Mizuta, Y., Tsukamoto, K., Kohno, S. (2006). Effects of macrolides on pneumolysin of macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Eur Respir J 27: 1020-1025 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • D'Costa, V. M., McGrann, K. M., Hughes, D. W., Wright, G. D. (2006). Sampling the Antibiotic Resistome. Science 311: 374-377 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ambrose, K. D., Nisbet, R., Stephens, D. S. (2005). Macrolide Efflux in Streptococcus pneumoniae Is Mediated by a Dual Efflux Pump (mel and mef) and Is Erythromycin Inducible. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 4203-4209 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Park, S., Soumerai, S. B, Adams, A. S, Finkelstein, J. A, Jang, S., Ross-Degnan, D. (2005). Antibiotic use following a Korean national policy to prohibit medication dispensing by physicians. Health Policy Plan 20: 302-309 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ferrandiz, M. J., Ardanuy, C., Linares, J., Garcia-Arenzana, J. M., Cercenado, E., Fleites, A., de la Campa, A. G., the Spanish Pneumococcal Infection Study Network, (2005). New Mutations and Horizontal Transfer of rpoB among Rifampin-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae from Four Spanish Hospitals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 2237-2245 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wasfy, M. O., Pimentel, G., Abdel-Maksoud, M., Russell, K. L., Barrozo, C. P., Klena, J. D., Earhart, K., Hajjeh, R. (2005). Antimicrobial susceptibility and serotype distribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae causing meningitis in Egypt, 1998-2003. J Antimicrob Chemother 55: 958-964 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zhanel, G. G., Johanson, C., Laing, N., Hisanaga, T., Wierzbowski, A., Hoban, D. J. (2005). Pharmacodynamic Activity of Telithromycin at Simulated Clinically Achievable Free-Drug Concentrations in Serum and Epithelial Lining Fluid against Efflux (mefE)-Producing Macrolide- Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae for Which Telithromycin MICs Vary. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 1943-1948 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Farver, D. K, Hedge, D. D, Lee, S. C (2005). Ramoplanin: A Lipoglycodepsipeptide Antibiotic. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 39: 863-868 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jimenez, M. R. M., Bellido, J. L. M., Garcia Rodriguez, J. A. (2005). Risk Factors Associated with Colonization by Pneumococci with Reduced Susceptibility to Fluoroquinolones in Adult Outpatients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 1193-1197 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sokos, D. R. (2005). Pharmacists' role in increasing pneumococcal and influenza vaccination. Am J Health Syst Pharm 62: 367-377 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Okitsu, N., Kaieda, S., Yano, H., Nakano, R., Hosaka, Y., Okamoto, R., Kobayashi, T., Inoue, M. (2005). Characterization of ermB Gene Transposition by Tn1545 and Tn917 in Macrolide-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 168-173 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pelton, S. I., Hammerschlag, M. R. (2005). Overcoming Current Obstacles in the Management of Bacterial Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Ambulatory Children. CLIN PEDIATR 44: 1-17  
  • Fernandez, A., Cabellos, C., Tubau, F., Maiques, J. M., Domenech, A., Ribes, S., Linares, J., Viladrich, P. F., Gudiol, F. (2005). Experimental study of teicoplanin, alone and in combination, in the therapy of cephalosporin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis. J Antimicrob Chemother 55: 78-83 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Marra, F., Patrick, D. M., White, R., Ng, H., Bowie, W. R., Hutchinson, J. M. (2005). Effect of formulary policy decisions on antimicrobial drug utilization in British Columbia. J Antimicrob Chemother 55: 95-101 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Voils, S. A, Evans, M. E, Lane, M. T, Schosser, R. H, Rapp, R. P (2005). Use of Macrolides and Tetracyclines for Chronic Inflammatory Diseases. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 39: 86-94 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Oteo, J., Lazaro, E., de Abajo, F. J., Baquero, F., Campos, J., Spanish Members of the European Antimicrobial Resi, (2004). Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance in 1,968 Invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae Strains Isolated in Spanish Hospitals (2001 to 2003): Decreasing Penicillin Resistance in Children's Isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 5571-5577 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zhanel, G. G., Johanson, C., Hisanaga, T., Mendoza, C., Laing, N., Noreddin, A., Wierzbowski, A., Hoban, D. J. (2004). Pharmacodynamic activity of telithromycin against macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum and epithelial lining fluid concentrations. J Antimicrob Chemother 54: 1072-1077 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Brown, S. D., Farrell, D. J., Morrissey, I. (2004). Prevalence and Molecular Analysis of Macrolide and Fluoroquinolone Resistance among Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae Collected during the 2000-2001 PROTEKT US Study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 4980-4987 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rybak, M. J (2004). Increased Bacterial Resistance: PROTEKT US--An Update. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 38: S8-S13 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Falco, V., Almirante, B., Jordano, Q., Calonge, L., del Valle, O., Pigrau, C., Planes, A. M., Gavalda, J., Pahissa, A. (2004). Influence of penicillin resistance on outcome in adult patients with invasive pneumococcal pneumonia: is penicillin useful against intermediately resistant strains?. J Antimicrob Chemother 54: 481-488 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Almer, L. S., Hoffrage, J. B., Keller, E. L., Flamm, R. K., Shortridge, V. D. (2004). In Vitro and Bactericidal Activities of ABT-492, a Novel Fluoroquinolone, against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Organisms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 2771-2777 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yoo, B. K, Triller, D. M, Yong, C.-S., Lodise, T. P (2004). Gemifloxacin: A New Fluoroquinolone Approved for Treatment of Respiratory Infections. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 38: 1226-1235 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Croisier, D., Etienne, M., Bergoin, E., Charles, P.-E., Lequeu, C., Piroth, L., Portier, H., Chavanet, P. (2004). Mutant Selection Window in Levofloxacin and Moxifloxacin Treatments of Experimental Pneumococcal Pneumonia in a Rabbit Model of Human Therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 1699-1707 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dagan, R., Garau, J. (2004). Appropriate Use of Antibiotics: Focus on Acute Otitis Media. CLIN PEDIATR 43: 313-321  
  • Maki, D. G. (2004). Pneumococcal Bacteremia: Lessons Learned, Yet More to Learn. Mayo Clin Proc. 79: 599-603  
  • Faich, G. A, Morganroth, J., Whitehouse, A. B, Brar, J. S, Arcuri, P., Kowalsky, S. F, Haverstock, D. C, Celesk, R. A, Church, D. A (2004). Clinical Experience with Moxifloxacin in Patients with Respiratory Tract Infections. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 38: 749-754 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Perez-Vazquez, M., Roman, F., Aracil, B., Canton, R., Campos, J. (2004). Laboratory Detection of Haemophilus influenzae with Decreased Susceptibility to Nalidixic Acid, Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin, and Moxifloxacin Due to gyrA and parC Mutations. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 1185-1191 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Low, D. E., Pichichero, M. E., Schaad, U. B. (2004). Optimizing Antibacterial Therapy for Community-Acquired Respiratory Tract Infections in Children in an Era of Bacterial Resistance. CLIN PEDIATR 43: 135-151 [Abstract]  
  • Pettit, R. K., Fakoury, B. R., Knight, J. C., Weber, C. A., Pettit, G. R., Cage, G. D., Pon, S. (2004). Antibacterial activity of the marine sponge constituent cribrostatin 6. J Med Microbiol 53: 61-65 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dandliker, P. J., Pratt, S. D., Nilius, A. M., Black-Schaefer, C., Ruan, X., Towne, D. L., Clark, R. F., Englund, E. E., Wagner, R., Weitzberg, M., Chovan, L. E., Hickman, R. K., Daly, M. M., Kakavas, S., Zhong, P., Cao, Z., David, C. A., Xuei, X., Lerner, C. G., Soni, N. B., Bui, M., Shen, L. L., Cai, Y., Merta, P. J., Saiki, A. Y. C., Beutel, B. A. (2003). Novel Antibacterial Class. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3831-3839 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Canton, R., Morosini, M., Enright, M. C., Morrissey, I. (2003). Worldwide incidence, molecular epidemiology and mutations implicated in fluoroquinolone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: data from the global PROTEKT surveillance programme. J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 944-952 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Karlowsky, J. A., Jones, M. E., Draghi, D. C., Sahm, D. F. (2003). Clinical Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae with Different Susceptibilities to Ceftriaxone and Cefotaxime. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3155-3160 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Arrieta, A., Arguedas, A., Fernandez, P., Block, S. L., Emperanza, P., Vargas, S. L., Erhardt, W. A., de Caprariis, P. J., Rothermel, C. D. (2003). High-Dose Azithromycin versus High-Dose Amoxicillin-Clavulanate for Treatment of Children with Recurrent or Persistent Acute Otitis Media. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3179-3186 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nilius, A. M., Shen, L. L., Hensey-Rudloff, D., Almer, L. S., Beyer, J. M., Balli, D. J., Cai, Y., Flamm, R. K. (2003). In Vitro Antibacterial Potency and Spectrum of ABT-492, a New Fluoroquinolone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3260-3269 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Schentag, J. J, Meagher, A. K, Forrest, A. (2003). Fluoroquinolone AUIC Break Points and the Link to Bacterial Killing Rates Part 2: Human Trials. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 37: 1478-1488 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Verhaegen, J., Peetermans, W., Verbist, L. (2003). Reply. J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 525-525 [Full Text]  
  • Schentag, J. J, Meagher, A. K, Forrest, A. (2003). Fluoroquinolone AUIC Break Points and the Link to Bacterial Killing Rates: Part 1: In Vitro and Animal Models. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 37: 1287-1298 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Davies, T. A., Goldschmidt, R., Pfleger, S., Loeloff, M., Bush, K., Sahm, D. F., Evangelista, A. (2003). Cross-resistance, relatedness and allele analysis of fluoroquinolone-resistant US clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae (1998-2000). J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 168-175 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Montanari, M. P., Cochetti, I., Mingoia, M., Varaldo, P. E. (2003). Phenotypic and Molecular Characterization of Tetracycline- and Erythromycin-Resistant Strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 2236-2241 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bingen, E., Doit, C., Loukil, C., Brahimi, N., Bidet, P., Deforche, D., Geslin, P. (2003). Activity of Telithromycin against Penicillin-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates Recovered from French Children with Invasive and Noninvasive Infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 2345-2347 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zhanel, G. G., DeCorby, M., Noreddin, A., Mendoza, C., Cumming, A., Nichol, K., Wierzbowski, A., Hoban, D. J. (2003). Pharmacodynamic activity of azithromycin against macrolide-susceptible and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum, epithelial lining fluid and middle ear fluid concentrations. J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 83-88 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Karlowsky, J. A., Thornsberry, C., Critchley, I. A., Jones, M. E., Evangelista, A. T., Noel, G. J., Sahm, D. F. (2003). Susceptibilities to Levofloxacin in Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis Clinical Isolates from Children: Results from 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 TRUST Studies in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1790-1797 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zhanel, G. G., Palatnick, L., Nichol, K. A., Bellyou, T., Low, D. E., Hoban, D. J. (2003). Antimicrobial Resistance in Respiratory Tract Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates: Results of the Canadian Respiratory Organism Susceptibility Study, 1997 to 2002. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1867-1874 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Johnson, C. N., Benjamin, W. H. Jr., Moser, S. A., Hollingshead, S. K., Zheng, X., Crain, M. J., Nahm, M. H., Waites, K. B. (2003). Genetic Relatedness of Levofloxacin-Nonsusceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates from North America. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 2458-2464 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Singer, M. E., Harding, I., Jacobs, M. R., Jaffe, D. H. (2003). Impact of antimicrobial resistance on health outcomes in the out-patient treatment of adult community-acquired pneumonia: a probability model. J Antimicrob Chemother 51: 1269-1282 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mason, E. O. Jr., Lamberth, L. B., Wald, E. R., Bradley, J. S., Barson, W. J., Kaplan, S. L. (2003). In Vitro Activities of Cethromycin (ABT-773), a New Ketolide, against Streptococcus pneumoniae Strains That Are Not Susceptible to Penicillin or Macrolides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 166-169 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Montanari, M. P., Mingoia, M., Cochetti, I., Varaldo, P. E. (2003). Phenotypes and Genotypes of Erythromycin-Resistant Pneumococci in Italy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 428-431 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Noreddin, A. M., Roberts, D., Nichol, K., Wierzbowski, A., Hoban, D. J., Zhanel, G. G. (2002). Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Clarithromycin against Macrolide-Resistant [PCR-Positive mef(A) or erm(B)] Streptococcus pneumoniae Simulating Clinically Achievable Serum and Epithelial Lining Fluid Free-Drug Concentrations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 4029-4034 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Paradise, J. L. (2002). A 15-Month-Old Child With Recurrent Otitis Media. JAMA 288: 2589-2598 [Full Text]  
  • Amezaga, M. R., Carter, P. E., Cash, P., McKenzie, H. (2002). Molecular Epidemiology of Erythromycin Resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates from Blood and Noninvasive Sites. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 3313-3318 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pichichero, M. E. (2002). Dynamics of Antibiotic Prescribing for Children. JAMA 287: 3133-3135 [Full Text]  
  • Pihlajamaki, M., Kaijalainen, T., Huovinen, P., Jalava, J., the Finnish Study Group for Antimicrobial Resistan, (2002). Rapid increase in macrolide resistance among penicillin non-susceptible pneumococci in Finland, 1996-2000. J Antimicrob Chemother 49: 785-792 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Low, D. E., de Azavedo, J., Weiss, K., Mazzulli, T., Kuhn, M., Church, D., Forward, K., Zhanel, G., Simor, A., McGeer, A. (2002). Antimicrobial Resistance among Clinical Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Canada during 2000. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 1295-1301 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Brueggemann, A. B., Coffman, S. L., Rhomberg, P., Huynh, H., Almer, L., Nilius, A., Flamm, R., Doern, G. V. (2002). Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae in United States since 1994-1995. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 680-688 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sahm, D. F., Thornsberry, C., Mayfield, D. C., Jones, M. E., Karlowsky, J. A. (2002). In Vitro Activities of Broad-Spectrum Cephalosporins against Nonmeningeal Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae: MIC Interpretation Using NCCLS M100-S12 Recommendations. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 669-674 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Baroody, F. M. (2001). Pediatric Sinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127: 1099-1101 [Full Text]  
  • (2001). Antimicrobial Resistance Among S. pneumoniae Still Increasing. JWatch Infect. Diseases 2001: 6-6 [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doern, G. V.
Right arrow Articles by Brueggemann, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doern, G. V.
Right arrow Articles by Brueggemann, A. B.