Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2001, p. 1894-1895, Vol. 45, No. 6
University of Hawaii, Department of Plant and
Environmental Protection Sciences, Honolulu, Hawaii
968221; Washington State University,
Tree Fruit Research and Extension Center, Wenatchee, Washington
988012; and University of
California, Department of Entomology, Davis, California
956163
Received 24 July 2000/Returned for modification 11 January
2001/Accepted 5 March 2001
Four synthetic peptides (Peptidyl MIMs; Demeter Biotechnologies,
Inc.) were evaluated for their in vitro activity against Acholeplasma laidlawii. Fifty percent effective
concentration values ranged from 1 to 15 µM. Three of these compounds
are more lethal than cecropin B against A. laidlawii.
Lytic polypeptides with
antimicrobial activity have been isolated from insect hemolymph,
amphibians, and mammals (3). Encoded by single genes,
these short peptides have potent antimicrobial activity against a wide
spectrum of microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi, yet have very
low toxicities to higher organisms. Biologically active synthetic
peptides have been produced, and gene constructs coding for lytic
polypeptides have been introduced into a number of higher plants for
the control of bacterial and fungal phytopathogens (1, 2, 7, 9,
10, 11, 12, 14, 17, 18, 19). We have evaluated the activity of
four synthetic cecropin analogs for their antimicrobial activities against the mollicute Acholeplasma laidlawii. These analogs
were designed for enhanced membrane lysis activity, and each possesses features characteristic of cecropin-like lytic polypeptides
(6). Specifically, these peptides each are strongly basic
polar molecules which are predicted to form hydrophilic amphipathic
A. laidlawii strain PG-8 (ATCC 23206) was grown in liquid
SP-4 medium (22) at 37°C. To assess the lytic activity
of each peptide, early-log-phase cultures were exposed to six
concentrations of four synthetic Peptidyl Membrane Interactive
Molecules (Peptidyl MIMs; Demeter Biotechnologies Inc., Triangle
Park, N.C.). The amino acid sequences of these peptides and
cecropin B are as follows: 6M1, FKLRAKIKVRLRAKIKL;
2M5, KRKRAVKRVGRRLKKLARKIARLGVAKLAGLRAVKLF; 2M2, KRKRAVKRVGRRLKKLARKIARLGVAF; 2L2,
FAKKFAKKFKKFAKKFAKFAFAF; cecropin B, KWKVFKKIEKMGRNIRNGIVKAGPAIAVLGEAKAL.
To each of seven 270-µl aliquots of early-log-phase A. laidlawii (107 to 108 CFU/ml) was added 30 µl of dilutions of each Peptidyl MIM. Solutions and cells were
incubated at 37°C for 60 min, and three 20-µl aliquots of each
dilution were plated and allowed to dry, without spreading, onto SP-4
medium solidified with 12% Noble agar. Plates were incubated at 37°C
for 2 to 3 days in a humidified chamber, and CFUs were counted after
staining in Diene's stain. All treatments with each Peptidyl MIM were
replicated three times. Mean viable CFU/ml values were calculated from
each replicated dilution plating. Percent survival for each Peptidyl
MIM at each peptide concentration was calculated based upon the CFU/ml
from each dilution plating divided by the CFU/ml of the water control.
EC50s (estimated concentrations resulting in 50% survival)
were calculated for each compound by regressing the percent survival
against the natural logarithm of the compound concentration. The
resulting regression equation was used to calculate the concentration
of compound that would result in 50% survival. Paired t
tests were used to compare mean EC50s for significant differences.
Of the four Peptidyl MIMs tested, peptides 6M1 (mean EC50
for three replicates, 1.1 µM) and 2M5 (mean EC50 for
three replicates, 0.8 µM) were the most lethal to A. laidlawii, with EC50s of about 1 µM. Peptide 2L2
(mean EC50 for three replicates, 1.5 µM) was moderately
effective, while peptide 2M2 (mean EC50 for two replicates, 16.3 µM) was the least toxic of those tested (Fig.
1). The EC50 values, with the
exception of those for peptide 2M2, were 5 to 15 times lower than that
of purified cecropin B, which had EC50 values of about 15 µM (data not shown) (mean values for 2M5 and 6M1 were not
significantly different from each other but were significantly
different from mean values for 2L2 and 2M2; mean values for 2M2 and 2L2
were significantly different from each other [P < 0.05]). These effective concentrations are of the same magnitude
as those reported for other synthetic lytic peptides derived from
cecropin B against a variety of gram-positive and gram-negative
bacteria (4, 5, 6, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, 21).
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.6.1894-1895.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Effects of Synthetic Cecropin Analogs on in Vitro
Growth of Acholeplasma laidlawii

![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
-helices in their N-terminal regions and more hydophobic
-helices
in their C-terminal regions.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Survival of A. laidlawii after 1-h exposures
to dilutions of four synthetic cecropins. Data points are mean values.
Symbols:
, 2M2;
, 2M5;
, 6M1;
, 2L2;
, cecropin B.
Interestingly, the activity of peptide 2M5 is much greater than that of
peptide 2M2, even though peptide 2M2 is a truncated form of peptide
2M5. Peptide 2M5 contains 10 additional C-terminal amino acid residues
that are not present in peptide 2M2 and which extend the hydrophobic
-helix at the C terminus of the molecule. This extended hydrophobic
tail may facilitate the embedding of the molecule in the cell membrane
of mollicutes, which may lead to the destabilization or dissolution of
the membrane.
Peptide 6M1 was also very effective against A. laidlawii;
however, this compound does not share the same overall structural similarities as the other peptides tested. Although it is composed of
mostly basic peptide residues that form amphipathic
-helices, it
does not have the strongly hydrophilic N terminus and hydrophobic C
terminus that the other peptides have in common with cecropin B. Its
antimicrobial activity, however, is comparable to that of peptide 2M5,
the most effective compound used in this study. Peptide 6M1 is
predicted to form amphipathic
-helices at its N and C termini that
are connected by a short, rather flexible, intervening segment. A
similar conformation has been shown for the cecropins, and it has been
proposed that this general structure is integral to their mode of
action (6). However, the other peptides used in this study
are predicted to exist along their entire lengths as amphipathic
-helices without any intervening flexible region. Therefore,
although peptide 6M1 contains a linker segment and has relatively high
lytic activity, the presence of such a segment linking the N- and
C-terminal
-helices seems to not be required for lytic activity of
these compounds against A. laidlawii.
An interesting effect of Peptidyl MIM 2L2 was the 20 to 30% increase in cell titers of A. laidlawii at concentrations of less than 1 µM. Such stimulation of cell growth by low concentrations of lytic peptides has also been reported in other systems (12). This effect was reproducible and may reflect alterations to the membrane structure that result in increased cell metabolism or reproduction of mollicutes.
The results presented here demonstrate that these cecropin-like analogs have powerful antimicrobial effects on A. laidlawii growth in vitro. A. laidlawii is closely related to unculturable phytoplasmas based on 16S ribosomal DNA sequences (8, 16). Although such sequence homology provides only taxonomic placement and does not necessarily reflect similar physiological characteristics, it is possible that these cecropin analogs may have similar effects on phytoplasmas, which also are prokaryotes devoid of cell walls. Therefore, these analogs may prove useful in the development of transgenic plants with high resistance to phytoplasmas.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported in part by a grant from the USDA Special Grants Program for Tropical and Subtropical Agriculture Research to J. Hu, D. Ullman, and V. Jones (#93-34135-8809).
We thank Demeter Biotechnologies Inc. for the synthetic peptides used in this study and J. M. Jaynes for helpful suggestions on testing protocols.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: University of Hawaii, Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, 3190 Maile Way, Honolulu, HI 96822. Phone: (808) 956-2830. Fax: (808) 956-2832. E-mail: borth{at}hawaii.edu.
Journal series 4548 of the College of Tropical Agriculture and
Human Resources.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Allefs, S., D. E. A. Florack, C. Hoogendoorn, and W. J. Stiekema. 1995. Erwinia soft rot resistance of potato cultivars transformed with a gene construct coding for antimicrobial peptide cecropin B is not altered. Am. Potato J. 72:437-445. |
| 2. | Belknap, W. R., D. Corsini, J. J. Pavek, G. W. Snyder, D. R. Rockhold, and M. E. Vayda. 1994. Field performance of transgenic Russet Burbank and Lemhi Russet potatoes. Am. Potato J. 71:285-296. |
| 3. | Bowman, H. G. 1991. Antibacterial peptides: key components needed in immunity. Cell 65:205-207[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. | Bowman, H. G., I. Faye, G. H. Gudmundsson, J.-Y. Lee, and D.-A. Lidholm. 1991. Cell-free immunity in Cecropia. Eur. J. Biochem. 201:23-31[Medline]. |
| 5. | Destefano-Beltran, L., P. G. Nagpala, M. S. Cetiner, J. H. Dodds, and J. M. Jaynes. 1990. Enhancing bacterial and fungal disease resistance in plants: application to potato, p. 205-221. In M. E. Vayda, and W. D. Park (ed.), The molecular and cellular biology of the potato. Biotechnology in agriculture no. 3. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom. |
| 6. | Fink, J., A. Bowman, H. G. Bowman, and R. B. Merrifield. 1989. Design, synthesis and antibacterial activity of cecropin-like model peptides. Int. J. Peptide Res. 33:412-421. |
| 7. | Florack, D., S. Allefs, R. Bollen, D. Bosch, B. Visser, and W. Stiekema. 1995. Expression of giant silkmoth cecropin B genes in tobacco. Transgenic Res. 4:132-141[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. |
Gundersen, D. E.,
I.-M. Lee,
S. A. Rehner,
R. E. Davis, and D. T. Kingsbury.
1994.
Phylogeny of mycoplasmalike organisms (phytoplasmas): a basis for their classification.
J. Bacteriol.
176:5244-5254 |
| 9. | Hassan, M., S. L. Sinden, R. S. Kobayashi, R. O. Nordeen, and L. D. Owens. 1993. Transformation of potato (Solanum tuberosum) with a gene for an antibacterial protein, cecropin. Acta Hortic. 336:127-131. |
| 10. | Huang, Y., R. O. Nordeen, M. Di, L. D. Owens, and J. H. McBeath. 1997. Expression of an engineered cecropin gene cassette in transgenic tobacco plants confers disease resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci. Phytopathology 87:494-499[Medline]. |
| 11. | Hultmark, D., A. Engstrom, H. Bennich, R. Kapur, and H. G. Bowman. 1982. Insect immunity: isolation and structure of cecropin D and four minor antibacterial components from Cecropia pupae. Eur. J. Biochem. 127:207-217[Medline]. |
| 12. | Jaynes, J. M. 1993. Use of genes encoding novel lytic peptides and proteins that enhance microbial disease resistance in plants. Acta Hortic. 336:33-39. |
| 13. | Jaynes, J. M., P. Nagpala, L. Destefano-Beltran, J. H. Huang, J. Kim, T. Denny, and S. Cetiner. 1993. Expression of a cecropin B lytic peptide analog in transgenic tobacco confers enhanced resistance to bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Plant Sci. (Shannon) 89:43-53. |
| 14. | Jaynes, J. M., K. G. Xanthopoulos, L. Destefano-Beltran, and J. H. Dodds. 1987. Increasing bacterial disease resistance in plants utilizing antibacterial genes from insects. Bioessays 6:263-270[CrossRef]. |
| 15. | Kadono-Okuda, K., K. Taniai, Y. Kato, E. Kotani, and M. Yamakawa. 1994. Effects of synthetic Bobmyx mori cecropin B on the growth of plant pathogenic bacteria. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 65:309-310. |
| 16. | Kirkpatrick, B. C., and C. D. Smart. 1995. Phytoplasmas: can phylogeny provide the means to understand pathogenicity? Adv Bot. Res. 21:187-212. |
| 17. | Mills, D., and F. A. Hammerschlag. 1993. Effect of cecropin B on peach pathogens, protoplasts, and cells. Plant Sci. 93:143-150[CrossRef]. |
| 18. | Nordeen, R. O., S. L. Sinden, J. M. Jaynes, and L. D. Owens. 1992. Activity of cecropin SB37 against protoplasts from several plant species and their bacterial pathogens. Plant Sci. (Shannon) 82:101-107. |
| 19. | Norelli, J., H. Aldwinckle, L. Destefano-Beltran, and J. M. Jaynes. 1993. Increasing the fire blight resistance of apple by transformation with genes encoding antibacterial proteins. Acta Hortic. 338:385-386. |
| 20. | Qul, X.-M., H. Steiner, A. Engstrom, H. Bennich, and H. G. Bowman. 1982. Insect immunity: isolation and structure of cecropins B and D from pupae of the chinese oak silk moth, Anatheraea pernyi. Eur. J. Biochem. 127:219-224[Medline]. |
| 21. |
Wade, D.,
A. Bowman,
B. Wahlin,
C. M. Drain,
D. Andreu,
H. G. Bowman, and R. B. Merrifield.
1990.
All-D amino acid-containing channel-forming antibiotic polypeptides.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:4761-4765 |
| 22. | Whitcomb, R. F. 1983. Culture media for spiroplasmas. Methods Mycoplasmol. 1:147-158. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»