Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2001, p. 1900-1904, Vol. 45, No. 6
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.6.1900-1904.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Staphylococcus aureus Cell Extract
Transcription-Translation Assay: Firefly Luciferase Reporter System for
Evaluating Protein Translation Inhibitors
Robert W.
Murray,
Earline P.
Melchior,
Jeanne C.
Hagadorn, and
Keith R.
Marotti*
Pharmacia Corporation, Kalamazoo, Michigan
49007
Received 1 December 2000/Returned for modification 25 January
2001/Accepted 9 March 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The promoter for the Staphylococcus aureus capsule
polysaccharide synthesis gene (cap1A) was cloned in
front of the firefly luciferase gene for use in a cell extract
S. aureus transcription-translation system. The assay is
rapid, reproducible, and sensitive and has a lower background level
than the radiolabeled amino acid incorporation translation assays. We
present data evaluating a transcription inhibitor and a number of
protein translation inhibitors in this system.
 |
TEXT |
Transcription and translation have
proven to be fruitful targets for antibiotic discovery. A number of
marketed antibiotics inhibit bacterial growth through inhibition of
prokaryotic RNA transcription and protein translation. Rifampin is a
potent inhibitor of bacterial RNA polymerase, and the macrolides,
lincosamides, aminoglycosides, tetracyclines and oxazolidinones all
have protein translation as their site of action. Unfortunately, the
increase in the antibiotic resistance of gram-positive bacteria
threatens to reduce the effectiveness of these and other antibiotics.
These concerns act as an incentive to discover new and more effective transcription and protein translation inhibitors. The development of a
nonradioactive Staphylococcus aureus cell extract
transcription-translation (T/T) assay will provide a means to rapidly
evaluate new inhibitors of prokaryotic transcription and translation in
a gram-positive-bacterium-specific system.
S. aureus RN4220 (ATCC 35556), a restriction-deficient
strain, was used in the development of the T/T assay
(3). The procedure for making S. aureus
S30 extracts that was described by R. Mahmood et al. (1)
was followed, with some modifications. Six liters of brain heart
infusion medium was inoculated with 250 ml of an S. aureus
overnight culture and grown at 37°C for 4 to 5 h to an optical
density at 600 nm of 2 to 4. Cells were pelleted and washed
successively with 500 ml of cold S30-buffer A (10 mM Tris-acetate, pH
8.0, 14 mM Mg-acetate, 1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT]) containing 1 M KCl
and then 250 ml of buffer A containing 50 mM KCl. Cell pellets (~50 g
[wet weight]) were stored at
70°C. Frozen cell pellets were
thawed on ice for 30 to 60 min. The slurry was resuspended up to a
final volume of 99 ml of buffer B (10 mM Tris-acetate, pH 8.0, 20 mM
Mg-acetate, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT). A 1.5-ml volume of lysostaphin (0.8 mg/ml) in buffer B was added to the bottom of three precooled, 35-ml
polyallomer SS-34 centrifuge tubes. Thirty-three milliliters of cell
slurry was transferred to each of the three tubes containing
lysostaphin solution (final concentration, 35 µg/ml), capped, and
gently mixed by inversion. The slurry was incubated at 37°C for 45 to
60 min, and the tubes were inverted periodically. After incubation, 150 µl of 0.5 M DTT was added to each tube and mixed gently. The lysed
cells were spun at 4°C in an SS-34 rotor (16,000 rpm; 30,000 × g for 30 min). The supernatant was saved, and the cell
pellet was recentrifuged under the same conditions. The supernatants
were pooled and recentrifuged to remove cellular debris. The top
two-thirds of the supernatant was collected, and 0.25 volume of
preincubation buffer was added (670 mM Tris-acetate, pH 8.0, 20 mM
Mg-acetate, 7 mM Na3-phosphoenolpyruvate, 7 mM
DTT, 5.5 mM ATP, 70 µM amino acids, complete [Promega], 75 µg of
pyruvate kinase [Sigma]/ml). The mixture was incubated at 37°C for
30 min. The preincubated supernatant was dialyzed overnight (Spectra-Por 7; molecular weight cutoff, 3,500) at 4°C against 2 liters of dialysis buffer (10 mM Tris-acetate, pH 8.0, 14 mM Mg-acetate, 60 mM K-acetate, 1 mM DTT) with one buffer change. The
dialysate was gently concentrated to ~10 mg/ml by covering a dialysis
bag (Spectra-Por 7; molecular weight cutoff, 3,500) containing the
extract with precooled polyethylene glycol 8000 powder (Sigma) at
4°C. The extract was aliquoted, flash frozen, and stored in the vapor
phase of a liquid nitrogen freezer.
Construction of the S. aureus luciferase reporter
plasmid.
The pBESTluc plasmid (Promega Corporation)
contains the firefly luciferase gene under the control of the
Escherichia coli tac promoter. The E. coli tac
promoter was exchanged with the cap1A promoter and
corresponding Shine-Dalgarno site from the S. aureus type 1 capsule polysaccharide biosynthesis gene cluster to produce the pSAluc
plasmid as shown in Fig. 1
(4). The cap1A promoter was selected because it
has been shown to be a strong promoter in S. aureus
(4). The cap1A-luc gene construct was assembled
by synthesizing a long oligonucleotide containing the cap1A
promoter, the Shine-Dalgarno site, and a 5' region of the luc gene. PCR primers were designed using the software Oligo
5.0 (Molecular Biology Insights), which amplified a DNA fragment
containing the promoter region fused with the first 1,419 bp of the
firefly luciferase gene sequence. The amplified fragment was cloned
into pBESTluc as a HindIII-ClaI
fragment. The pSAluc plasmid can be easily propagated in
E. coli but can be used as the template to drive the
S. aureus in vitro coupled T/T assay.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
pSAluc cloning strategy. (A) pSAluc upper primer
sequence. The S. aureus cap1A promoter, the
Shine-Dalgarno (S-D) sequence, and the first 20 bp of the firefly
luciferase gene sequence are shown with relevant restriction sites. (B)
Plasmid map of pSAluc. The region between the HindIII
and ClaI restriction sites indicates the area of the
gene amplified which replaced the tac
promoter-luc gene construct in the
pBESTluc plasmid (Promega) with the S. aureus
cap1A promoter-luc gene construct in pSAluc. The
sequence of the pSAluc lower primer used in this cloning strategy is as
follows: GTCATCGTCGGGAAGACCTG. The S. aureus
cap1A promoter and corresponding Shine-Dalgarno sequences are
as those published by S. Ouyang and C. Y. Lee (4).
|
|
S. aureus in vitro coupled T/T assay.
The
reagents (amino acid mixture; Premix) in the commercially available kit
for E. coli in vitro coupled T/T assay (Promega Corporation)
can be used interchangeably with the S. aureus S30 assay.
Each new preparation of S. aureus S30 extract or pSAluc DNA
is titrated in the luciferase assay to determine optimal concentration (Fig. 2). For trichloroacetic acid (TCA)
precipitation, the reaction volume was 50 µl, and for the luciferase
assay, the reaction volume was 25 µl. In each case, 2.5× Premix (500 mM potassium acetate, 87.5 mM Tris-acetate [pH 8.0], 67.5 mM ammonium
acetate, 50 µg of folinic acid/ml, 5 mM DTT, 87.5 mg of polyethylene
glycol 8000/ml, 5.0 mM ATP, 1.25 mM [each] additional ribonucleoside
triphosphate, 0.02 mM amino acids, 50 mM phosphoenolpyruvate
[trisodium salt], 2.5 mM cyclic AMP, 250 µg of each E. coli tRNA/ml), 10× amino acid mix (1.25 mM concentrations of each
amino acid), pSAluc plasmid, S. aureus strain RN4220
S30 extract, and inhibitor were added. Inhibitor compounds were
dissolved in 100% dimethyl sulfoxide and diluted such that the final
dimethyl sulfoxide concentration was 3% or less. For TCA
precipitation, 10× amino acid minus methionine mix plus 10 µCi of
[35S]methionine (1,000 Ci/mmol; Amersham) was
used in the reaction mixture. (The reagent concentrations are
essentially as described by Zubay [5]). Reaction
mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 1 h. A 10-µl aliquot of
the reaction mixture was used for the determination of either
TCA-precipitable counts or luciferase activity. For TCA precipitation,
the reaction aliquot was hydrolyzed in 250 µl of 1 N NaOH at 37°C
for 10 min. This mixture was acid precipitated by the addition of 1 ml
of 25% cold TCA with 2% Casamino Acids. The filtrate was collected on
glass fiber filters (GF/A; Whatman) and counted by liquid scintillation
spectrometry. For the luciferase assay, 50 µl of Luciferase Assay
Reagent (Promega Corporation) was added and the readout was taken on a
Trilux scintillation/luminescence reader (Wallac) according to the
manufacturer's instructions.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
S. aureus in vitro coupled T/T luciferase
assay in the presence of increasing concentrations of reaction
components: pSAluc plasmid DNA (A) and S. aureus RN4220
S30 extract (B). Reaction conditions were as described in the text for
the luciferase assay. Activity is expressed in arbitrary light
units.
|
|
Figure
2 demonstrates the dependence of the production of luciferase on
the amount of pSAluc in the assay and on the amount
of
S. aureus S30 extract. The amount of S30 and pSAluc plasmid
used
should be optimized each time a new S30 extract is prepared
due to
slight variations in the activity in each new S30
preparation.
Translation was measured either by monitoring radiolabeled amino acid
incorporation or by measuring luminescence. The pSAluc
plasmid was used
in both assays as a template. Table
1
shows
that the background is lower and, consequently, that the
signal-to-noise
ratio is much higher when luminescence is measured
rather than
TCA-precipitable radiolabeled protein. The high background
in
the radiolabeled assay is thought to be caused by the presence
of
the endogenous mRNAs or mRNA fragments in the S30 that result
in the
translation of nonspecific protein products. In contrast,
the
luminescence assay detects only full-length functional firefly
luciferase protein.
Since a commercially available
E. coli T/T assay (Promega)
which uses luciferase as the indicator to monitor translation is
available, the question of whether the
S. aureus T/T assay
would
offer any advantage over the
E. coli system could be
asked. Table
2 shows the results of
testing several antibiotics in both systems.
With the exception of
streptomycin, the inhibition of translation
by the
gram-positive-bacteria spectrum antibiotics in the
S. aureus T/T assay more closely agreed with the
S. aureus MICs. The
dose-response
inhibition profiles for chloramphenicol,
erythromycin, streptomycin,
tetracycline, two oxazolidinones, and
rifampin in the
S. aureus T/T assay can be seen in Fig.
3. The reason for the different
shapes of
the inhibition profiles is not completely understood
but is likely
associated with the mechanism of action.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Inhibitory activity profiles for various known
antibiotics in the S. aureus and E. coli
in vitro coupled T/T luciferase assays. Error bars indicate standard
deviation.
|
|
The
S. aureus T/T assay is a simple nonradioactive method
that can be used to examine transcription-coupled translation in
a
medically important gram-positive organism. The assay may also
be used
to characterize mutants resistant to inhibitors of translation
or
transcription. By fractionating S30 into the soluble S100 fraction
and
the ribosomal pellet, ribosomes or S100 from resistant organisms
can be
mixed with S100 or ribosomes from sensitive organisms to
determine if
the resistance resides with the ribosome or with
some factor in the
soluble S100 fraction. The assay makes use
of commercially available
reagents, a modified plasmid DNA, and
an
S. aureus S30
extract. The assay provides a facile, rapid,
high throughput method for
evaluating putative inhibitors of prokaryotic
transcription and
translation. We have demonstrated an association
between MIC and
luciferase activity inhibition in the presence
of known antibiotics as
well as two oxazolidinones

linezolid and
eperezolid.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Infectious
Diseases Biology, 7263-209-721, 301 Henrietta St., Kalamazoo, MI
49007. Phone: (616) 833-1934. Fax: (616) 833-1559. E-mail:
Keith.R.Marotti{at}pharmacia.com.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Mahmood, R.,
P. Compagnone-Post, and S. A. Khan.
1991.
An in vitro coupled transcription-translation system from Staphylococcus aureus.
Gene
106:29-34.
|
| 2.
|
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
1993.
Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 3rd ed. Approved standard M7-A3.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa.
|
| 3.
|
Novick, R. N.
1991.
Genetic systems in Staphylococci.
Methods Enzymol.
204:587-636.
|
| 4.
|
Ouyang, S., and C. Y. Lee.
1992.
Transcriptional analysis of type 1 capsule genes in Staphylococcus aureus.
Mol. Microbiol.
6:1515-1522.
|
| 5.
|
Zubay, G.
1973.
In vitro synthesis of protein in microbial systems.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
7:267-287.
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2001, p. 1900-1904, Vol. 45, No. 6
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.6.1900-1904.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Mott, J. E., Shaw, B. A., Smith, J. F., Bonin, P. D., Romero, D. L., Marotti, K. R., Miller, A. A.
(2008). Resistance mapping and mode of action of a novel class of antibacterial anthranilic acids: evidence for disruption of cell wall biosynthesis. J Antimicrob Chemother
62: 720-729
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Stone, G. G., Girard, D., Finegan, S., Duignan, J., Schafer, J., Maloney, M., Zaniewski, R. P., Brickner, S. J., Wade, S. K., Le, P. T., Huband, M. D.
(2008). In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of CE-156811, a Novel Analog Derived from Hygromycin A. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 2663-2666
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Maguire, B. A., Wondrack, L. M., Contillo, L. G., Xu, Z.
(2008). A novel chromatography system to isolate active ribosomes from pathogenic bacteria. RNA
14: 188-195
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
O'Neill, A. J., Miller, K., Oliva, B., Chopra, I.
(2004). Comparison of assays for detection of agents causing membrane damage in Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother
54: 1127-1129
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pratt, S. D., David, C. A., Black-Schaefer, C., Dandliker, P. J., Xuei, X., Warrior, U., Burns, D. J., Zhong, P., Cao, Z., Saiki, A. Y. C., Lerner, C. G., Chovan, L. E., Soni, N. B., Nilius, A. M., Wagenaar, F. L., Merta, P. J., Traphagen, L. M., Beutel, B. A.
(2004). A Strategy for Discovery of Novel Broad-Spectrum Antibacterials Using a High-Throughput Streptococcus pneumoniae Transcription/Translation Screen. J Biomol Screen
9: 3-11
[Abstract]
-
Limburg, E., Gahlmann, R., Kroll, H.-P., Beyer, D.
(2004). Ribosomal Alterations Contribute to Bacterial Resistance against the Dipeptide Antibiotic TAN 1057. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 619-622
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Galluzzi, L., Karp, M.
(2003). Amplified Detection of Transcriptional and Translational Inhibitors in Bioluminescent Escherichia Coli K-12. J Biomol Screen
8: 340-346
[Abstract]