This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuchs, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fuchs, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2001, p. 1915-1918, Vol. 45, No. 6
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.6.1915-1918.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

In Vitro Activities of Ertapenem (MK-0826) against Clinical Bacterial Isolates from 11 North American Medical Centers

Peter C. Fuchs,* Arthur L. Barry, and Steven D. Brown

The Clinical Microbiology Institute, Wilsonville, Oregon 97070

Received 8 August 2000/Returned for modification 17 December 2000/Accepted 8 March 2001


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

This study compared the in vitro activities of the new long-half-life carbapenem ertapenem (also known as MK-0826 and L-749,345) with those of imipenem, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and ciprofloxacin against 5,558 recent clinical isolates from 11 North American medical centers. We confirmed the greater activity of ertapenem than of imipenem against the Enterobacteriaceae and the greater activity of imipenem against pseudomonads and gram-positive bacteria.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Ertapenem (also known as MK-0826 and L-749,345) is a new long-half-life carbapenem with a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (1-4, 7). Preliminary pharmacokinetic studies indicate that ertapenem has a prolonged half-life (half-life at beta  phase of 4.9 ± 0.7 h) sufficient to permit once-a-day dosing (2, 8). This long half-life is largely due to its high protein binding of >95% (8). Ertapenem MICs found in the presence of serum were no more than eightfold higher than in standard tests (I. Pelak, S. Gerckens, P. M. Scott, C. Gill, C. Pacholok, L. Lynch, K. Dorso, J. Kohler, D. Shungu, and H. Kropp, Abstr. 36th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F119, p. 120, 1996). In animal studies the high protein binding had no apparent deleterious effect on ertapenem's in vivo efficacy (2). Peak levels in plasma of human volunteers following a 1.0-g intravenous dose were >100 µg/ml (8). The drug is currently undergoing clinical trials. The present study was designed to assess the in vitro activity of ertapenem in comparison with those of imipenem, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and ciprofloxacin against clinical isolates from 11 North American medical centers.

For these studies, 5,558 bacterial isolates were obtained from the 11 North American medical centers listed at the end of this paper. These isolates included 2,019 nonfastidious gram-negative bacteria, 540 fastidious gram-negative bacteria, 2,789 gram-positive isolates, and 210 anaerobes. Each center was requested to collect consecutive isolates that were deemed clinically significant during late winter to early spring of 1999. For each species, collection continued until a predefined target number of isolates was obtained or until the collection period ended. Multiple isolates from one patient were not included so that the consecutive isolates truly represent bacterial pathogens being encountered at that time. All isolates submitted for testing were identified by each contributing laboratory using their own standard methods. All susceptibility tests were performed at the Clinical Microbiology Institute, Wilsonville, Oreg. The species and numbers of each species tested are listed in Table 1.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Susceptibilities of 5,558 clinical isolates to ertapenem and three comparator drugs

Ertapenem and imipenem were provided as standardized powders by Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, N.J. Ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and ampicillin were obtained from their respective U.S. manufacturers or other commercial source. All aerobic bacteria were evaluated by broth microdilution methods as outlined by the NCCLS (5). Microdilution panels were prepared by PML Microbiologicals, Wilsonville, Oreg., and stored at -70°C until used. The cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth was supplemented with ca. 3% lysed horse blood when necessary for growth (e.g., streptococci). Haemophilus test medium was used for testing Haemophilus species. Concentrations of drugs tested were serial twofold dilutions ranging from 16 to 0.008 µg/ml for ertapenem, imipenem, and ciprofloxacin; 32 to 0.03 µg/ml for amoxicillin-clavulanate; and 4.0 to 0.03 for ampicillin (fastidious gram-negative isolates only). Anaerobic bacteria were tested by the agar dilution method recommended by the NCCLS (6), using Brucella blood agar supplemented with vitamin K1 (1.0 µg/ml) and hemin (5 µg/ml) and using an inoculum of ca. 105 CFU per spot.

On each day of testing, colony counts were performed on the bacterial suspension in the growth control wells of two randomly selected microdilution trays to ensure an inoculum density of approximately 5 × 105 CFU/ml. Standard control strains that were included with each test run were those that were appropriate for the species of clinical isolates being tested.

Table 1 summarizes the antimicrobial activities of ertapenem and three comparison agents against 5,558 strains of clinical bacterial isolates. Ertapenem was more active against all species of Enterobacteriaceae than imipenem. Ertapenem MICs were generally 10 to 20 times lower than those of imipenem for most species and were over 100 times lower for some species of the tribe Proteeae. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and related species, both drugs were less active than against the Enterobacteriaceae, but imipenem was more active than ertapenem. Amoxicillin-clavulanate was the least active of the four drugs tested against nonfastidious gram-negative bacteria. Ciprofloxacin MICs were generally slightly higher than those of ertapenem and lower than those of imipenem for Enterobacteriaceae, and for most species of non-Enterobacteriaceae they were lower than those of the other drugs tested.

Ertapenem was active against gram-positive bacteria other than enterococci and oxacillin-resistant staphylococci (Table 1). Imipenem was more potent than ertapenem against nearly all gram-positive species. The MICs of ertapenem and imipenem were higher for penicillin-resistant pneumococci (MICs at which 90% of the isolates tested were inhibited [MIC90], 2.0 and 1.0 µg/ml) than against penicillin-susceptible pneumococci (MIC90, 0.03 and 0.016 µg/ml). The geometric mean MICs of both carbapenems were 40-fold higher for penicillin-resistant pneumococci than for penicillin-susceptible strains. A similar difference in MICs was observed with amoxicillin-clavulanate, but ciprofloxacin MICs were unaffected by penicillin susceptibility of pneumococci.

Fastidious gram-negative bacteria, except for ampicillin resistance of beta -lactamase-producing Haemophilus spp., were highly susceptible to all four test drugs (Table 1). For Haemophilus spp., the MICs of ertapenem were 2- to 10-fold lower than those of imipenem. beta -Lactamase production by H. influenzae had no perceptible effect on the MICs of either carbapenem or ciprofloxacin.

Virtually all anaerobic isolates tested were susceptible to <= 4.0 µg of both carbapenems per ml (Table 1). Against Clostridium perfringens, ertapenem was twice as active as imipenem, but against the other anaerobic bacteria, imipenem was more potent.

In summary, ertapenem was superior to the other study drugs in its potency against the Enterobacteriaceae but it had relatively little activity against Pseudomonas spp. Although ertapenem was active against most gram-positive cocci, imipenem was somewhat more potent. Both carbapenems had little activity against the enterococci, especially vancomycin-resistant strains. Anaerobic bacteria were also susceptible to both carbapenems even though imipenem was more potent than ertapenem. Because ertapenem may be given once a day and because of its potency against the Enterobacteriaceae, ertapenem might be useful in treating a variety of infections in humans.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge the following for providing the clinical isolates for this study: M. Bauman, Providence St. Vincent Medical Center, Portland, Oreg; T. Cleary, University of Miami, Miami, Fla.; M. J. Ferraro, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; D. Hardy, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, N.Y.; J. Hindler, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif.; S. Jenkins, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, N.C.; G. Overturf, University of New Mexico Medical Center, Albuquerque; R. Rennie, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; K. Waites, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham; G. Procop, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; and P. Murray, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo.

This study was supported by a financial grant from Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, N.J.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Clinical Microbiology Institute, 9725 SW Commerce Circle, Wilsonville, OR 97070. Phone: (503) 682-3232. Fax: (503) 682-2065. E-mail: cmi{at}hevanet.com.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Fuchs, P. C., A. L. Barry, and S. D. Brown. 1999. In-vitro antimicrobial activity of a carbapenem, MK-0826 (L-749,345) and provisional interpretive criteria for disc tests. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 43:703-706[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Gill, C. J., J. J. Jackson, L. S. Gerckens, B. A. Pelak, R. K. Thompson, J. G. Sundelof, H. Kropp, and H. Rosen. 1998. In vitro activity and pharmacokinetic evaluation of a novel long-acting carbapenem antibiotic, MK-826 (L-749,345). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1996-2001[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Jacoby, G., P. Han, and J. Tran. 1997. Comparative in vitro activities of carbapenem L-749,345 and other antimicrobials against multiresistant gram-negative clinical pathogens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1830-1831[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Kohler, J., K. L. Dorso, K. Young, G. G. Hammond, H. Rosen, H. Kropp, and L. L. Silver. 1999. In vitro activities of the potent, broad-spectrum carbapenem MK-0826 (L-749,345) against broad-spectrum beta -lactamase- and extended-spectrum beta -lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli clinical isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1170-1176[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 4th ed. Approved standard M7-A4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
6. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria, 4th ed. Approved standard M11-A4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
7. Odenholt, I., E. Lowdin, and O. Cars. 1998. In vitro pharmacodynamic studies of L-749,345 in comparison with imipenem and ceftriaxone against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:2365-2370[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. Sundelof, J. G., R. Hajdu, C. J. Gill, R. Thompson, H. Rosen, and H. Kropp. 1997. Pharmcokinetics of L-749,345, a long-acting carbapenem antibiotic, in primates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1743-1748[Abstract/Free Full Text].


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2001, p. 1915-1918, Vol. 45, No. 6
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.6.1915-1918.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Burkhardt, O., Brunner, M., Schmidt, S., Grant, M., Tang, Y., Derendorf, H. (2006). Penetration of ertapenem into skeletal muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue in healthy volunteers measured by in vivo microdialysis. J Antimicrob Chemother 58: 632-636 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ling, T. K. W., Xiong, J., Yu, Y., Lee, C. C., Ye, H., Hawkey, P. M., The MK0826 China Study Group, (2006). Multicenter Antimicrobial Susceptibility Survey of Gram-Negative Bacteria Isolated from Patients with Community-Acquired Infections in the People's Republic of China. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 374-378 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fish, D. N., Teitelbaum, I., Abraham, E. (2005). Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Imipenem during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 2421-2428 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Burkhardt, O., Majcher-Peszynska, J., Borner, K., Mundkowski, R., Drewelow, B., Derendorf, H., Welte, T. (2005). Penetration of Ertapenem Into Different Pulmonary Compartments of Patients Undergoing Lung Surgery. J Clin Pharmacol 45: 659-665 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Livermore, D. M., Mushtaq, S., Warner, M. (2005). Selectivity of ertapenem for Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants cross-resistant to other carbapenems. J Antimicrob Chemother 55: 306-311 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jacoby, G. A., Mills, D. M., Chow, N. (2004). Role of {beta}-Lactamases and Porins in Resistance to Ertapenem and Other {beta}-Lactams in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 3203-3206 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Alhambra, A., Cuadros, J. A., Cacho, J., Gomez-Garces, J. L., Alos, J. I. (2004). In vitro susceptibility of recent antibiotic-resistant urinary pathogens to ertapenem and 12 other antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother 53: 1090-1094 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Livermore, D. M., Sefton, A. M., Scott, G. M. (2003). Properties and potential of ertapenem. J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 331-344 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gesser, R. M., McCarroll, K., Teppler, H., Woods, G. L. (2003). Efficacy of ertapenem in the treatment of serious infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae: analysis of pooled clinical trial data. J Antimicrob Chemother 51: 1253-1260 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kato, N., Yamazoe, K., Han, C.-G., Ohtsubo, E. (2003). New Insertion Sequence Elements in the Upstream Region of cfiA in Imipenem-Resistant Bacteroides fragilis Strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 979-985 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pelak, B. A., Citron, D. M., Motyl, M., Goldstein, E. J. C., Woods, G. L., Teppler, H. (2002). Comparative in vitro activities of ertapenem against bacterial pathogens from patients with acute pelvic infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 50: 735-741 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tomera, K. M., Burdmann, E. A., Reyna, O. G. P., Jiang, Q., Wimmer, W. M., Woods, G. L., Gesser, R. M. (2002). Ertapenem versus Ceftriaxone Followed by Appropriate Oral Therapy for Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections in Adults: Results of a Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Multicenter Study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 2895-2900 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuchs, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fuchs, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S. D.