Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 2001, p. 2154-2156, Vol. 45, No. 7
Department of Medicine, Division of
Infectious Diseases,1 and Department of
Pathology, Clinical Microbiology
Division,3 Northwestern University
Medical School, and the Prevention Epicenter, Northwestern Memorial
Hospital,4 Chicago, Illinois, and Pharmacia
Corporation, Kalamazoo, Michigan2
Received 11 December 2000/Returned for modification 29 January
2001/Accepted 28 March 2001
To assess the potential for emergence of resistance during the use
of linezolid, we tested 10 clinical isolates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) (four Enterococcus faecalis, five
Enterococcus faecium, and one Enterococcus
gallinarum) as well as a vancomycin-susceptible control (ATCC
29212) strain of E. faecalis. The enterococci were exposed
to doubling dilutions of linezolid for 12 passes. After the final
passage, the linezolid plate growing VRE contained a higher drug
concentration with E. faecalis than with E. faecium. DNA sequencing of the 23S rRNA genes revealed that
linezolid resistance in three E. faecalis isolates was
associated with a guanine to uracil transversion at bp 2576, while the
one E. faecium isolate for which the MIC was 16 µg/ml
contained a guanine to adenine transition at bp 2505.
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci
(VRE) have emerged as important nosocomial pathogens in medical centers
throughout the United States. Over the last decade, the incidence of
VRE has been increasing, and currently nearly one-quarter of
enterococci isolated from patients in intensive care units are
vancomycin resistant (2, 9). In addition, these organisms
are capable of prolonged survival on the hands of healthcare workers as
well as on environmental surfaces commonly encountered in the
healthcare setting (11).
Linezolid is a member of a new class of antibacterial agents called the
oxazolidinones, which are chemically unrelated to currently available
agents. This agent selectively binds to the 50S ribosomal subunit,
thereby resulting in inhibition of bacterial protein synthesis
(6). These compounds are unique in that they do not
inhibit elongation (3, 4, 14) but instead inhibit the
formation of the initiation complex constructed with 70S ribosomes, mRNA, initiation factors IF2 and IF3, and formylmethionyl-tRNA (15). Linezolid is highly active against gram-positive
organisms, including VRE (10). The purposes of this study
were to select for VRE resistant to linezolid in vitro and to
investigate the stability of this resistance, if it could be developed.
We chose 10 clinical isolates of VRE, 5 of which were
Enterococcus faecium (EF208, EF1347, EF1401, EF1509, and
EF1644), 4 of which were Enterococcus faecalis (F118, F177,
F217, and F317), and 1 of which was Enterococcus gallinarum
(Z393). All were isolated from patients at Northwestern Memorial
Hospital, Chicago, Ill. Vancomycin resistance (screened for by using a
MIC of The basic approach used to select for resistance utilized serial
passage on successively higher concentrations, similar to the methods
previously applied to the selection of E. faecium highly
resistant to quinupristin-dalfopristin (7). To examine the
stability of resistance, the isolates were subcultured to drug-free
agar twice weekly for one month and then tested by the agar
dilution method (8) to determine the final linezolid MIC.
Cultures were grown overnight in 50 ml of brain heart infusion broth at
37°C. Chromosomal DNA was isolated as described by Baele and
colleagues (1), except that the cell lysate was extracted twice with phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24:25:1) before the DNA
was precipitated with ethanol. PCR was then carried out using the
primers 5'-GACGGAAAGACCCCATGG-3' and
5'-ACACTTAGATGCTTT-3' corresponding to bp 2049 to
2767. Amplification was carried out using Taq DNA polymerase
(Gibco) according to the manufacturer's directions.
PCR products were sequenced directly by using an ABI377 fluorescence
sequencer (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) and
the ABI BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction kit with
AmpliTaq FS DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems).
A summary of the results of this investigation is provided in Table
1. The initial linezolid MIC, tested by
broth dilution, for all VRE and the ATCC 29212 strain was 1 µg/ml.
Selection of linezolid-resistant mutants occurred for all four of the
vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis strains and the
vancomycin-susceptible control strain. The final MIC for one of the
vancomycin-resistant E. faecium strains was 16 µg/ml,
while the final MICs for the remaining E. faecium isolates
and the E. gallinarum isolate were
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.7.2154-2156.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Resistance to Linezolid: Characterization of
Mutations in rRNA and Comparison of Their Occurrences in
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
6 µg/ml as recommended by the NCCLS) was determined by agar
dilution (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) testing according to the
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (8).
E. faecalis ATCC 29212 was tested as a
vancomycin-susceptible control. All isolates were initially tested for
their baseline activity against linezolid (Pharmacia Corp., Kalamazoo,
Mich.) according to a standard tube dilution method (8).
Susceptibility testing was performed using doubling dilutions ranging
from 0.25 to 8 µg/ml. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration
of the antibiotic that exhibited no visible turbidity. The
susceptibility breakpoint for linezolid is
4 µg/ml.
8 µg/ml, despite multiple attempts to select for resistant mutants. Two of these isolates (EF 1401 and EF 1509) were from patients who were previously treated with linezolid for VRE bacteremia. In neither of these strains
were we able to select for resistance despite prior clinical exposure
to this antimicrobial agent.
TABLE 1.
Results of in vitro selection of linezolid-resistant
enterococci
Interestingly, the vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis strains
developed resistance to linezolid more rapidly and to a greater extent
than did E. faecium strains. For E. faecalis, the
range for the final-pass MICs was 32 to 128 µg/ml; however, for
E. faecium, the range was 2 to 16 µg/ml. Selection of
linezolid-resistant mutants occurred for all strains of E. faecalis tested, but at various rates; the MICs developed for
three of the four strains by passage 5 were
16 µg/ml.
For only one isolate (F317) was there a change in the final linezolid MIC following growth on drug-free media for one month, and this represented a twofold change from the final-pass MIC after one month of growth on drug-free media.
Resistance to linezolid is uncommon based on in vitro results as well
as those from clinical trials. A relatively low spontaneous mutation
frequency has been observed with linezolid and is consistent with the
results obtained with other oxazolidinones (4, 12). Previous investigations with staphylococci failed to identify spontaneous mutants at twice the MIC and higher, resulting in a
calculated spontaneous mutational frequency of less than
10
9 to 10
11 (5, 16). In
addition, serial passage of both enterococci and staphylococci on
gradient plates has failed to produce a high frequency of resistant
mutants (16).
Our results suggest that it is more difficult to select for enterococci resistant to linezolid than to quinupristin-dalfopristin (7). For E. faecalis, we were able to select for resistance in all four of the isolates, which began to develop after three passes. In contrast, for vancomycin-resistant E. faecium, resistance did not begin to develop until at least 10 passes. When similar selection studies were performed with quinupristin-dalfopristin, high-level resistance developed very rapidly with all isolates tested (7). The data also suggest that when significant resistance (above the MIC breakpoint, 4 µg/ml) develops, it is stable, as it was with experiments performed with quinupristin-dalfopristin.
PCR amplification of the 23S rRNA gene region corresponding to the
peptidyl transferase site revealed that the linezolid-resistant E. faecalis isolates F118, F217, F317, and ATCC 29212 all
had a guanine to uracil conversion at bp 2576 (Fig.
1). This G2576U mutation had been
previously described for two E. faecium isolates obtained
from two separate patients who developed resistance to linezolid while
on therapy (G. E. Zurenko, W. M. Todd, B. Hafkin, B. Meyers,
C. Kauffman, A. Bock, J. Slightom, and D. Shinabarger, Abstr. 39th
Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. C-848, 1999).
Both of these patients received prolonged courses of linezolid for VRE
bacteremia with infected intravascular devices that could not be
removed. In addition, G2576U has occurred in both E. faecalis and S. aureus selected for resistance to the oxazolidinone eperezolid in the laboratory (13; S. M. Swaney, D. L. Shinabarger, R. D. Schaadt, J. H. Bock, J. L. Slightom, and G. E. Zurenko, Abstr. 38th Intersci. Conf.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. C-104, 1998). E. faecalis F217 was particularly unusual in that it contained three
mutations (C2512U, G2513U, and C2610G) in addition to G2576U. The
contribution of these three unusual mutations to the level of linezolid
resistance is unknown since the MIC for F217 and ATCC 29212 was the
same.
|
In order to determine whether linezolid-resistant E. faecium isolates contained 23S rRNA mutations, EF1644 was sequenced because it exhibited the highest level of resistance (16 µg/ml) compared to the other four E. faecium isolates from this study. Interestingly, EF1644 was found to contain a new mutation at G2505A not previously found in oxazolidinone-resistant bacteria. DNA sequencing of E. gallinarum Z393 (MIC for the strain, 8 µg/ml) failed to detect any mutations in the peptidyl transferase region. We are continuing to sequence the genes which encode 23S and 16S rRNAs, as well as the genes which encode ribosomal proteins, in Z393 in order to determine whether a mutation is indeed present.
Overall, our investigation demonstrates the potential for development of resistance to linezolid among vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis strains; however, there was difficulty in selecting for resistance in vancomycin-resistant E. faecium isolates. In addition, these results suggest that the mechanism of resistance for E. faecalis and E. faecium may be different. Our data suggest that linezolid has a finite but low propensity for the selection of resistance in vancomycin-resistant E. faecium strains.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported in part by the Medical School Research Grant Program, Northwestern University Medical School, and Pharmacia.
We thank C. Bannigan and J. Slightom for DNA sequencing.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Infectious Diseases, Northwestern University Medical School, Feinberg 16-704, 251 E. Huron St., Chicago, IL 60611. Phone: (312) 926-2729. Fax: (312) 926-7845. E-mail: gnoskin{at}northwestern.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Baele, M.,
P. Baele,
M. Vaneechoutte,
V. Storms,
P. Butaye,
L. A. Devriese,
G. Verschraegen,
M. Gillis, and F. Haesebrouck.
2000.
Application of tRNA intergenic spacer PCR for identification of enterococcus species.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:4201-4207 |
| 2. | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1999. National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) system report, data summary from January 1990-May 1999, issued June 1999. Am. J. Infect. Control 27:520-532[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. |
Daly, J. S.,
G. M. Eliopoulos,
E. Reiszner, and R. C. Moellering, Jr.
1988.
Activity and mechanism of action of DuP 105 and DuP 721, new oxazolidinone compounds.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
21:721-730 |
| 4. |
Daly, J. S.,
G. M. Eliopoulos,
S. Willey, and R. C. Moellering, Jr.
1988.
Mechanism of action and in vitro and in vivo activities of S-6123, a new oxazolidinone compound.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
32:1341-1346 |
| 5. | Kaatz, G. W., and S. M. Seo. 1996. In vitro activities of oxazolidinone compounds U-100592 and U-100766 against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:799-801[Abstract]. |
| 6. | Lin, A. H., R. W. Murray, T. J. Vidmar, and K. R. Marotti. The oxazolidinone eperezolid binds to the 50S ribosomal subunit and competes with binding of chloramphenicol and lincomycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2127-2131. |
| 7. | Millichap, J., T. A. Ristow, G. A. Noskin, and L. R. Peterson. 1996. Selection of Enterococcus faecium strains with stable and unstable resistance to the streptogramin RP 59500 using step-wise in vitro exposure. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 25:15-20[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard. M7-A5. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa. |
| 9. | Noskin, G. A. 1997. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci: clinical, microbiologic, and epidemiologic features. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 130:14-20[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. |
Noskin, G. A.,
F. Siddiqui,
V. Stosor,
D. Hacek, and L. R. Peterson.
1999.
In vitro activity of linezolid against important gram-positive bacterial pathogens including vancomycin-resistant enterococci.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:2059-2062 |
| 11. | Noskin, G. A., V. Stosor, I. Cooper, and L. R. Peterson. 1995. Recovery of vancomycin resistant enterococci on fingertips and environmental surfaces. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 16:577-581[Medline]. |
| 12. | Schaadt, R. D., D. H. Batts, P. T. Daley-Yates, S. D. Pawsey, D. J. Stalker, and G. E. Zurenko. 1997. Serum inhibitory titers and serum bactericidal titers for human subjects receiving multiple doses of the antibacterial oxazolidinones eperezolid and linezolid. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 28:201-204[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. | Shinabarger, D. 1999. Mechanism of action of the oxazolidinone antibacterial agents. Exp. Opin. Investig. Drugs 8:1195-1202. |
| 14. | Shinabarger, D. L., K. R. Marotti, R. W. Murray, A. H. Lin, E. P. Melchior, S. M. Swaney, D. S. Dunyak, W. F. Demyan, and J. M. Buysse. 1997. Mechanism of action of oxazolidinones: effects of linezolid and eperezolid on translation reactions. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2132-2136[Abstract]. |
| 15. |
Swaney, S. M.,
H. Aoki,
M. C. Ganoza, and D. L. Shinabarger.
1998.
The oxazolidinone linezolid inhibits initiation of protein synthesis in bacteria.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:3251-3255 |
| 16. | Zurenko, G. E., B. H. Yagi, R. D. Schaadt, J. W. Allison, J. O. Kilburn, S. E. Glickman, D. K. Hutchinson, M. R. Barbachyn, and S. J. Brickner. 1996. In vitro activities of U-100592 and U-100766, novel oxazolidinone antibacterial agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:839-845[Abstract]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»