Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2001, p. 2536-2542, Vol. 45, No. 9
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.9.2536-2542.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Clinafloxacin Pharmacokinetics in Subjects with
Various Degrees of Renal Function
Edward J.
Randinitis,1,*
Jeffery
R.
Koup,1
George
Rausch,2
Robert
Abel,3
Nicola J.
Bron,2
Neil J.
Hounslow,2
Artemios B.
Vassos,2 and
Allen
J.
Sedman2
Clinical Pharmacokinetics and
Pharmacodynamics Department,1 Experimental
Medicine Department,2 and Nonclinical
Biostatistics Department,3 Pfizer Global
Research and Development, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Received 31 October 2000/Returned for modification 27 March
2001/Accepted 5 June 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
As the primary route for elimination of clinafloxacin is renal
clearance (CLR) of unchanged drug, studies were conducted
to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of clinafloxacin following administration to young and elderly subjects, subjects with various degrees of renal function, and subjects requiring dialysis. These were
open-label studies in which subjects received single oral clinafloxacin
doses. Sixteen young subjects (18 to 35 years old) and 16 elderly subjects (>65 years old) were enrolled in a study comparing
pharmacokinetic profiles of clinafloxacin in young and elderly subjects. Twenty subjects having various degrees of renal function were enrolled into one of three groups based on degree of
renal function as measured by creatinine clearance
(CLCR). Twelve subjects with severe renal impairment
requiring dialysis enrolled in a third study. Clinafloxacin was
generally well tolerated by all subjects. Clinafloxacin pharmacokinetic
profiles in elderly subjects were dependent only on age-related
decreases in renal function. Clinafloxacin maximum concentrations in
plasma, areas under the concentration-time curves,
and terminal elimination half-life values increased with decreasing
CLCR values. Total apparent body clearance of clinafloxacin
from the plasma after oral administration (CLoral)
and CLR were dependent on CLCR according to the
following relationships: CLoral = 2.3 · CLCR + 77 and CLR = 1.74 · CLCR. Hemodialysis had no significant effect on
clinafloxacin clearance. Based on the relationship between
CLCR and clinafloxacin CLoral and
CLR values, the clinafloxacin dose should be halved in
patients having a CLCR of <40 ml/min. Further dose
adjustment is not warranted in patients requiring hemodialysis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Clinafloxacin is an extremely
potent member of the fluoroquinolone class of synthetic antimicrobial
agents. Compared with available quinolone antibiotics, clinafloxacin
usually requires lower drug concentrations for bacterial inhibition and
is active against a broader spectrum of organisms. It is
effective against many multiple-drug-resistant organisms,
including quinolone-resistant strains (5, 6, 7, 10, 12,
16). Clinafloxacin has been studied primarily in hospitalized
adults for the treatment of serious and potentially
life-threatening infections, including nosocomial pneumonia,
community-acquired pneumonia, febrile neutropenia, complicated
intra-abdominal infections, complicated skin and soft tissue
infections, endocarditis, and acute gynecologic infections (16). It became apparent from initial clinical studies
that twice-daily 100- to 400-mg doses were required to maintain
concentrations in plasma within the effective range for most infections.
Single and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of clinafloxacin have been
reported previously (2, 17). Following administration of
200- and 400-mg twice-daily intravenous doses, the mean total body
clearance and volume of distribution values are approximately 320 ml/min and 156 liters, respectively, and the mean terminal elimination
half-life (t1/2) is approximately
5.8 h. Clinafloxacin is approximately 50% bound to plasma
proteins, independent of concentration.
Approximately 50 to 70% of a clinafloxacin dose is excreted unchanged
in urine, indicating that renal clearance (CLR)
is a primary route of drug elimination. Therefore, it is expected that clinafloxacin concentrations in patients having decreased renal function will be higher than those in patients having normal renal function when both sets of patients receive clinafloxacin at the same
dose. Accordingly, single-dose clinafloxacin pharmacokinetic profiles were evaluated in subjects with various degrees of renal function to establish dosing recommendations for patients with decreased renal function. A major age-related physiological change that
could potentially affect pharmacokinetic profiles is a change in
excretion due to reduced glomerular filtration and diminished renal
tubular function. Additional age-related changes that could affect
pharmacokinetic profiles include changes in absorption due to reduced
gastric acid production, lower gastric emptying rate, decreased
motility, reduced blood flow, and reduced absorptive surface area;
changes in distribution due to decreased total body mass, reduced
proportion of body water, less plasma albumin and
1-acid glycoprotein, increased proportion of
body fat, and altered tissue perfusion; and changes in metabolism due
to reduced liver mass, decreased liver blood flow, and reduced hepatic
metabolic capacity. (11) Therefore, a study was also
conducted to compare clinafloxacin pharmacokinetic profiles in young
and elderly subjects to establish dosing recommendations in elderly
subjects. In addition, a study was conducted in patients with severe
renal impairment requiring hemodialysis to determine if additional
clinafloxacin doses are required to maintain concentrations in plasma
within the safe and effective range in these patients.
(Preliminary results of these studies have been presented elsewhere
[E. J. Randinitis, J. R. Koup, G. Rausch, N. J. Bron, N. J. Hounslow, A. B. Vassos, and A. J. Sedman,
Abstr. 38th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr.
A-018, 1998], and brief reports of portions of this work have been
published [18, 19].)
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Subjects and study conduct.
Study protocols were approved by
institutional review boards associated with the study sites, and all
studies were conducted according to the ethical principles stated in
the Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects provided written
informed consent before entering the study and were free to withdraw at
any time at their own discretion. Eligible subjects were men and women
in good to excellent health according to degree of renal function and
who had no unstable medical problems. Health was evaluated by medical history, physical examination, and clinical laboratory measurements. Subjects were confined to the clinic for 24 h following the
administration of the clinafloxacin dose for safety evaluation by
physicians and returned to the clinic for additional scheduled blood sampling.
Study 1: young and elderly subjects.
Sixteen healthy
subjects between 18 and 35 years old and 16 healthy elderly subjects
(>65 years old) were enrolled in this study. Subject enrollment groups
were equally divided by sex in order to evaluate any possible
differences in clinafloxacin pharmacokinetic profiles between the sexes.
Study 2: subjects having mild, moderate, and severe renal
impairment.
To ensure enrollment of subjects having a wide range
of renal function, 20 subjects were enrolled in one of three groups
based on creatinine clearance (CLCR) values
estimated using the method of Cockcroft and Gault (4).
Groups had CLCR values of >60 ml/min, between 30 and 60 ml/min, and <30 ml/min but not on dialysis. At least three
subjects in the third group were to have a CLCR of <15 ml/min.
Study 3: subjects having severe renal impairment requiring
hemodialysis.
Twelve subjects having renal impairment severe
enough to require hemodialysis and maintained on hemodialysis at least
once weekly were enrolled in this study. Subjects could be anuric (< 50 ml of urine per 24 h).
Design of studies.
All studies were open-label, single-dose,
parallel-group designs. Subjects having various degrees of renal
impairment, including those having severe renal impairment requiring
hemodialysis, received single 200-mg clinafloxacin oral doses with 240 ml of water. Young and elderly subjects received single 400-mg
clinafloxacin oral doses. Subjects maintained on hemodialysis received
the dose approximately 24 h before their next scheduled
hemodialysis treatment. Subjects not maintained on hemodialysis fasted
overnight before and for 4 h following administration of the dose.
Subjects requiring hemodialysis fasted for 4 h before and after
the dose. Identical lunches and identical dinners were served to each
subject after collection of the 4- and 10-h blood samples,
respectively. Essential medication was allowed before and after the 8-h
fasting period in these subjects in order to eliminate any potential
drug interaction. It has been shown that oral clinafloxacin should
be administered at least 2 h before or 4 h after
administration of a magnesium- or aluminum-containing antacid and that
clinafloxacin may be administered without regard to meals or meal
timing (1).
Safety.
Subjects were required to remain in the clinic for
24 h following the administration of the dose for safety
observation by physicians. Physical examinations including vital signs
were conducted prior to the dose, at 4 and 24 h following the
dose, and at closeout. Clinical laboratory tests were conducted prior
to and at 24 h following the dose.
Sampling.
For subjects not maintained on hemodialysis,
venous blood samples (3 ml) were collected into heparinized tubes
before the clinafloxacin dose and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 h postdose. For subjects maintained on hemodialysis, 2-ml samples were collected before the clinafloxacin dose
and at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h postdose. Blood samples were also
collected from subjects entering and exiting the dialyzer before as
well as 1, 2, 3, and 4 h after the beginning of hemodialysis (equivalent to 24, 25, 26, 27, and 28 h postdose). Additional blood samples were collected 1 and 2 h after the end of
hemodialysis (equivalent to 29 and 30 h postdose) and at 32, 36, and 48 h postdose. Blood samples were immediately centrifuged, and
plasma was separated and stored frozen in plastic containers at
20°C until assayed. For all subjects, a 100-ml urine specimen was
collected before the dose. All urine voided during the 0- to 6-, 6- to
12-, 12- to 24-, 24- to 48-, 48- to 72-, and 72- to 96-h time intervals was collected. Total urine volumes were measured for each urine collection period, and 20-ml portions were stored frozen at
20°C until assayed. Dialysate samples (20 ml) were collected at the start of
hemodialysis; at 1, 2, and 3 h after beginning hemodialysis; and
upon completion of hemodialysis (equivalent to 24, 25, 26, 27, and
28 h postdose). Hemodialysate flow rate, blood inflow rate,
dialyzer membrane surface area, and temperature were recorded. Dialysate samples were stored frozen at
20°C until assayed.
Assay of clinafloxacin.
Plasma and urine samples were
assayed for clinafloxacin concentration using validated liquid
chromatographic methods with UV detection as described previously
(17). Dialysate samples were assayed by the urine method.
Detector responses were linear over the calibration range of 0.025 to
10 µg/ml and 2.5 to 200 µg/ml for plasma and urine, respectively.
Intra- and interday assay precision, as measured by the coefficient of
variation, was <15% for both plasma and urine. No interfering peaks
were evident in samples collected prior to clinafloxacin dosing,
indicating that essential medications required by some subjects did not
interfere with the clinafloxacin assay.
Pharmacokinetic analysis.
For all subjects, maximum
concentrations in plasma (Cmax) and
time to Cmax
(Tmax) were recorded as observed. The
area under the concentration-time curves (AUC) values were estimated
using the linear trapezoidal rule. AUC values were calculated
from zero time to the time of the last quantifiable concentration
(LQC). Values of terminal-phase elimination rate constants
(
z) were estimated as the absolute values of
the slope of a least-squares regression line of natural logarithm (ln)
concentration-time profiles during the terminal phase. The
t1/2 values were calculated as ln(2)/
z. In subjects not maintained on
hemodialysis, values of AUC at infinity
(AUC
) were calculated as the sum of
corresponding values of AUC at the LQC and
LQC/
z values. Total apparent body clearance
of clinafloxacin from the plasma after oral administration
(CLoral) was calculated as
dose/AUC
. The apparent volume of distribution
after oral administration (Voral) was
calculated as
(CLoral)/
z. The total
amount of drug excreted in urine during the 96-h postdose interval as unchanged clinafloxacin (Ae) was calculated as the product of urine
volume and concentration. The percentage of the dose excreted (Ae%) as
unchanged clinafloxacin was calculated as (Ae/dose) · 100. CLR was calculated as
Ae/AUC
. Because the absolute bioavailability
of clinafloxacin from capsules in normal subjects is approximately 90%
(17), nonrenal clearance (CLNR)
values were approximated as the difference between
CLoral and CLR. In subjects
maintained on hemodialysis, AUC
values were
calculated as the sum of corresponding AUC24 and
C24/
z
values, where AUC24 is the AUC at 24 h
postdose and C24 is the concentration in the sample collected 24 h postdose, immediately before the start of hemodialysis. These values represent pharmacokinetic parameters for subjects requiring hemodialysis who were not on hemodialysis at the time. Values for
t1/2 were estimated during as well as
after hemodialysis. Hemodialysis clearance (CLd) values were calculated as follows: CLd = [(Cin
Cout)/Cin] · [Qb · (1
HCT)], where
Cin and
Cout are plasma clinafloxacin concentrations measured in blood samples entering and exiting the
dialyzer, respectively, and, Qb and HCT are blood flow rate entering
the dialyzer and hematocrit measured at each collection time,
respectively (11). Individual time point
CLd values obtained by this method were used to
calculate an average subject CLd. The fraction
of dose removed from the body by hemodialysis was calculated as
follows: Fd = 100% · Ad/dose, where
Ad is the amount of clinafloxacin removed
by the hemodialysis; Ad is calculated as
follows: Ad = CLd · AUC, where AUC is measured during
the 4-h hemodialysis period. Values for Ae% and
CLR for anuric subjects were set at zero for
evaluation of descriptive statistics. Clinafloxacin concentrations in
dialysate were below the limit of quantitation (2.5 µg/ml) in all
samples for all subjects. Therefore, dialysate concentrations were not used in data analyses.
Statistical methods.
Mean clinafloxacin pharmacokinetic
parameter values following administration of single 400-mg oral doses
were compared between age groups and between sexes within age groups
for possible clinically important differences. To assess which
physiologic variable might best predict changes in key pharmacokinetic
parameters, an analysis of covariance model consisting of
CLCR, body weight, age (as a continuous
variable), and sex as main effects was fitted using forward stepwise
regression (SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.). Parameter estimates and
coefficients of multiple determination were evaluated. The ability of
each successive model to predict a given pharmacokinetic parameter was
assessed by comparing variability with those of simpler models.
Graphical presentations of relationships between individual
CLCR and pharmacokinetic parameter values were
inspected for trends of possible clinical significance. Regression
analysis was used to assess the relationships between subject
CLCR values and CLoral and
CLR values. All 32 subjects completing the
young-elderly study and 19 subjects having various degrees of
renal function were used in this regression evaluation. Outliers were
determined using standard statistical procedures (8). Mean
clinafloxacin pharmacokinetic parameters for subjects who were
maintained on hemodialysis were compared with those for subjects with
severely impaired renal function but not maintained with hemodialysis
for differences likely to be of clinical importance and to determine
whether further dose adjustment is required in patients maintained on
hemodialysis. Values for Ae% were examined to determine whether
supplemental clinafloxacin doses are required to maintain effective
plasma clinafloxacin concentrations in patients with renal impairment requiring hemodialysis.
 |
RESULTS |
Subject demographics and safety.
Subject demographics are
summarized in Table 1 and dialysis
specifications are given in Table 2. In
general, single, 200- and 400-mg clinafloxacin oral doses were well
tolerated by subjects with various degrees of renal impairment as well
as healthy young and elderly subjects. In the young-elderly study, a
25-year-old male subject with a history of migraine headaches and a
family history of childhood seizures in a sibling experienced a
tonic-clonic seizure considered to be probably related to
clinafloxacin, about 45 min following administration of the single
400-mg dose. The subject fully recovered within 30 min. The
clinafloxacin pharmacokinetic profile in this subject was similar to
that observed in other younger subjects in this study, and data from
this subject were utilized in pharmacokinetic and statistical
evaluations. No other serious adverse events were recorded in these
studies. Clinical laboratory abnormalities were in general sporadic and
transient and appeared to be unrelated to drug administration. Many
quinolone anti-infective agents are reported to have central nervous
system-related adverse events, including seizures (3, 9,
13).
Pharmacokinetics. (i) Elderly versus young subjects.
Mean
clinafloxacin concentration-time profiles following administration of
single 400-mg oral doses to young and elderly subjects are illustrated
in Fig. 1. Clinafloxacin pharmacokinetic
parameter values are given in Table 3.
Parameter values determined for young healthy subjects were similar to
those reported previously (17). Clinafloxacin was rapidly
absorbed in young and elderly subjects. Values for
Tmax ranged from 0.5 to 3 h and
were independent of subject age. The mean
Cmax for elderly subjects was
approximately 18% higher than that observed in younger subjects. This
difference probably reflects differences in clearance. The mean
AUC
following administration of clinafloxacin
capsules in elderly subjects was 57% higher than that observed in
younger subjects. The mean t1/2 in
elderly subjects was 41% higher than that in younger subjects. Mean
CLoral and CLR values in
the elderly were 35 and 45% lower than those in younger subjects. As a
result of these differences in CLoral and
CLR values, plasma clinafloxacin concentrations
were higher in elderly subjects than in young subjects. Voral and Ae% values in elderly
subjects were similar to those in younger subjects, with differences in
mean values being approximately 9% and 14%, respectively.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Mean clinafloxacin concentrations in plasma following
administration of single 400-mg oral doses to young and elderly
subjects.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
Clinafloxacin pharmacokinetic parameter values following
administration of 400-mg oral doses to young and elderly healthy
subjects
|
|
Clinafloxacin pharmacokinetic parameter values separated by sex are
given in Table
4. Plasma clinafloxacin
concentrations,
as reflected in
Cmax and
AUC

values, tended to be slightly
higher in
female subjects than in male subjects, in both age groups.
Differences
in CL
oral values between male and female subjects
within age groups were small (<30% in each case). The difference
in
mean
Voral values was modest, the
values being 149 and 100
liters for male and female subjects,
respectively.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 4.
Clinafloxacin pharmacokinetic parameter values by sex
following administration of 400-mg oral doses to young and elderly
healthy subjects
|
|
Results from the forward selection analysis of covariance procedure
suggested that CL
CR, age, and sex were
statistically significant
predictors of clinafloxacin
CL
oral values. The principle predictor
covariate,
however, was CL
CR, which when incorporated into
the
model reduced the variability in predicted versus observed apparent
clearance values. Addition of age and sex to the model, while
statistically significant, resulted in only a slight further reduction
in variability. CL
CR, age, and sex were
statistically significant
predictors of CL
R
values. Inclusion of only CL
CR in the model,
however, resulted in a meaningful reduction in observed variability.
Addition of age and sex, while statistically significant, reduced
variability only slightly. Sex was the most significant predictor
of
Voral values. The difference between a
model consisting of
sex alone and a model consisting of body weight
alone was substantial.
Age, CL
CR, and body weight
added little to the
predictability.
In summary, differences in clinafloxacin CL
oral
and CL
R between young and elderly subjects are
largely accounted for by differences
in CL
CR due
to age-related decline in renal
function.
(ii) Subjects with various degrees of renal function not maintained
on hemodialysis.
Relationships between
CLoral and CLR values with
subject CLCR values are illustrated in Fig.
2 and 3,
respectively. Young and elderly subjects were included with
those having various degrees of renal function. Both
CLoral and CLR
correlated with decreasing renal function with the following
relationship: CLoral = 2.3 · CLCR + 77 and CLR = 1.74 · CLCR. As expected for a drug
eliminated primarily by renal excretion, CLoral
correlated well with CLCR. Correlation
coefficients were 0.88 and 0.93 relating CLoral
and CLR to CLCR,
respectively. A positive intercept in the relationship between
CLoral and CLCR indicated
the presence of a significant nonrenal clearance component,
representing approximately 25 to 30% of CLoral.
This was supported by the approximate CLNR values in young subjects having normal renal function given in Table 3.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Relationship between CLCR and clinafloxacin
oral clearance CLoral in subjects with various degrees of
renal function as well as young and elderly subjects. The outlier was
not used in regression analysis.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Relationship between CLCR and clinafloxacin
CLR in subjects with various degrees of renal function. The
intercept was not significantly different from zero. Therefore
regression was forced through the origin. The outlier was not used in
regression analysis.
|
|
The excellent correlation observed between CL
oral
and subject CL
CR values was used to predict
CL
oral values in subjects with
various degrees of
renal function according to previously published
methods (
14,
15,
20,
21). Using these relationships, subjects
having a
CL
CR between 30 and 40 ml/min would be expected
to have
approximately one-half of the clinafloxacin
CL
oral observed in
subjects having normal renal
function, i.e., a CL
CR of 100 to
120 ml/min.
Therefore, as a conservative measure, a CL
CR of
40
ml/min was selected as the breakpoint below which the clinafloxacin
dose should be reduced. Pharmacokinetic parameter values in subjects
having CL
CR values of >40 ml/min and those with
CL
CR values of
<40 ml/min are summarized in
Table
5. These values include young
and
elderly subjects normalized to a 200-mg dose, as well as subjects
having various degrees of renal function. Based on similar
Tmax and
Cmax values, the rate of clinafloxacin
absorption in subjects
having CL
CR values of
<40 ml/min was similar to that in subjects
having
CL
CR values of >40 ml/min.
AUC

and
t1/2
values for
subjects having CL
CR values of <40
ml/min were approximately one-half
and Ae% values were approximately
one-third of those in subjects
having CL
CR values
of >40 ml/min.
Voral and
CL
NR values were similar
in both subject groups.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 5.
Summary of clinafloxacin pharmacokinetic parameter values
following administration of single 200-mg doses to subjects with
various degrees of renal dysfunction, including young and elderly
subjects
|
|
(iii) Subjects maintained on hemodialysis.
Mean clinafloxacin
concentration-time profiles following administration of single 200-mg
oral doses to subjects maintained on hemodialysis are shown in Fig.
4. The figure also illustrates concentrations in plasma exiting the dialyzer. Pharmacokinetic parameter values for this group of subjects are summarized in Table 5.
Parameter values were similar to those in subjects with CLCR values of <40 ml/min who were not
maintained on hemodialysis. Approximately 4% of a single 200-mg
clinafloxacin dose was removed by the 4-h hemodialysis procedure.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Mean plasma clinafloxacin concentrations following
administration of single 200-mg oral doses to subjects with renal
failure requiring hemodialysis. Subjects received a 4-h hemodialysis
procedure beginning at 24 h postdose.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Based on similar Tmax and
Cmax values, rates of clinafloxacin
absorption are similar in young and elderly male and female subjects.
Small differences in Cmax values among
these groups is of no clinical importance. Based on similar
Voral values between age groups,
distributions of clinafloxacin were similar in young and elderly male
and female subjects. Voral values were
greater than total body water, suggesting extensive distribution of
clinafloxacin into tissues in all subjects. Based on similar
CLNR values in young and elderly male and female
subjects, clinafloxacin metabolism and/or other elimination mechanisms
(that is, biliary excretion) are not influenced by age or sex
differences. The major factor responsible for higher clinafloxacin
concentrations in plasma in the elderly is an age-related decrease in
renal function. Therefore, reduction in daily clinafloxacin dose based
on degree of renal function as measured by CLCR
values may be appropriate for the elderly. Differences in
pharmacokinetic parameter values between male and female subjects,
regardless of age, are not clinically important and do not warrant
clinafloxacin dose adjustment based on sex.
The recommended clinafloxacin dose in patients with normal renal
function is 200 mg twice daily. Based on the relationship between
clinafloxacin CLoral and subject
CLCR values, it is recommended that patients with
CLCR values of <40 ml/min, regardless of age, have their daily clinafloxacin dose halved. Therefore, these patients should receive either 100 mg of clinafloxacin twice daily or 200 mg
once daily to maintain plasma clinafloxacin concentrations within the
range effective for most organisms. This dosing regimen is also
recommended for patients on hemodialysis. As only 4% of the
clinafloxacin dose is removed by the 4-h hemodialysis procedure, supplemental clinafloxacin doses are not required during or after hemodialysis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank T. G. K. Mant of Guy's Drug Research Unit
Ltd., London, England, and E. A. Brown, W. T. Prince, and
W. D. H. Carey, of Charing Cross Hospital, London, England,
for conducting the clinical portions of the study in subjects with
various degrees of renal function and in patients with severe renal
impairment requiring hemodialysis, respectively. Thanks are also
extended to A. Richens of Cardiff Clinical Trials Ltd., University of
Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, and D. N. Morrison of
Biokinetic Clinical Applications LLC, Springfield, Mo., for conducting
the clinical portions of the study in young and elderly subjects. We
also thank Analytical Development Corporation, Colorado Springs, Colo.,
for clinafloxacin analysis of biological samples.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Pfizer Global
Research and Development, 2800 Plymouth Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48105. Phone: (734) 622-7447. Fax: (734) 622-3133. E-mail:
Edward.Randinitis{at}pfizer.com.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alvey, C.,
E. J. Randinitis,
G. Rausch, and A. B. Vassos.
1999.
Effects of food and antacid on the pharmacokinetics of clinafloxacin.
Drugs
58(Suppl. 2):256-257[CrossRef].
|
| 2.
|
Bron, N. J.,
M. B. Dorr,
T. G. Mant,
C. L. Webb, and A. B. Vassos.
1996.
The tolerance and pharmacokinetics of clinafloxacin in healthy subjects.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
38:1023-1029[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Christ, W.
1990.
Central nervous system toxicity of quinolones: human and animal findings.
J Antimicrob. Chemother.
26(Suppl. B):219-225.
|
| 4.
|
Cockcroft, D. W., and M. H. Gault.
1976.
Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.
Nephron
16:31-41[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Cohen, M. A., and M. D. Huband.
1999.
Activity of clinafloxacin, trovafloxacin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, and other antimicrobial agents versus Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin.
Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
33:43-46[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Cohen, M. A.,
M. D. Huband,
J. W. Gage,
S. L. Yoder,
G. E. Roland, and S. J. Gracheck.
1997.
In-vitro activity of clinafloxacin, trovafloxacin, and ciprofloxacin.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
40:205-211[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Cohen, M. A.,
M. D. Huband,
J. W. Gage,
S. L. Yoder, and G. E. Roland.
1998.
Bacterial eradication by clinafloxacin, CI-990, and ciprofloxacin employing MBC test, in-vitro time-kill and in-vivo time-kill studies.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
41:605-614[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Dixon, W. J., and F. J. Massey.
1957.
Introduction to statistical analysis, 2nd ed., p. 275-278.
McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y.
|
| 9.
|
Domagala, J. M..
1994.
Structure-activity and structure-side-effect relationships for the quinolone antibacterials.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
33:685-706[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Fuchs, P. C.,
A. L. Barry, and S. D. Brown.
1998.
In vitro activities of clinafloxacin against contemporary clinical bacterial isolates from 10 North American centers.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:1274-1277[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Gibaldi, M., and D. Perrier.
1982.
Pharmacokinetics, 2nd ed.
Marcel Dekker, New York, N.Y.
|
| 12.
|
Jorgensen, J. H.,
L. M. Weigel,
M. J. Ferraro,
J. M. Swenson, and F. C. Tenover.
1999.
Activities of newer fluoroquinolones against Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolates, including those with mutations in the gyrA, parC, and parE loci.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:329-334[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Lietman, P. S.
1995.
Fluoroquinolone toxicities: an update.
Drugs
49(Suppl. 2):159-163.
|
| 14.
|
Maderazo, E. G.
1995.
Antibiotic dosing in renal failure.
Med. Clin. N. Am.
79:919-933[Medline].
|
| 15.
| Maderazo, E. G., H Sun, and G. T. Jay.
1992. Simplification of antibiotic dose adjustments in renal
insufficiency: the DREM system. 340:767-770.
|
| 16.
|
Moellering, R. C., Jr.
1998.
The emergence of bacterial resistance to antibiotics: achieving optimum outcomes with clinafloxacin, a seminar-in-print.
Clin. Drug Investig.
15(Suppl. 1):1-48.
|
| 17.
|
Randinitis, E. J.,
J. I. Brodfuehrer,
I. Eiseman, and A. B. Vassos.
2001.
Pharmacokinetics of clinafloxacin after single and multiple doses.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
69:2529-2535.
|
| 18.
|
Randinitis, E. J.,
J. R. Koup,
G. Rausch,
N. J. Bron,
N. J. Hounslow,
A. B. Vassos, and A. J. Sedman.
1999.
Clinafloxacin pharmacokinetics in renal patients.
Drugs
58(Suppl. 2):250-251[CrossRef].
|
| 19.
|
Randinitis, E. J.,
R. Abel,
N. J. Bron,
N. J. Hounslow,
G. Rausch, and A. B. Vassos.
1999.
Effect of age on clinafloxacin pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers.
Drugs
58(Suppl. 2):246-247[CrossRef].
|
| 20.
|
Talbert, R. L.
1994.
Drug dosing in renal insufficiency.
J. Clin. Pharmacol.
34:99-110[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Weidekamm, E.
1993.
Pharmacokinetics of fleroxacin in renal impairment.
Am. J. Med.
94(Suppl. 3A):70S-74S[Medline].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2001, p. 2536-2542, Vol. 45, No. 9
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.9.2536-2542.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Randinitis, E. J., Alvey, C. W., Koup, J. R., Rausch, G., Abel, R., Bron, N. J., Hounslow, N. J., Vassos, A. B., Sedman, A. J.
(2001). Drug Interactions with Clinafloxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
45: 2543-2552
[Abstract]
[Full Text]