Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2001, p. 2594-2597, Vol. 45, No. 9
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.9.2594-2597.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Role of Penicillin-Binding Protein 5 in Expression of Ampicillin
Resistance and Peptidoglycan Structure in Enterococcus
faecium
Farid
Sifaoui,1
Michel
Arthur,1
Louis
Rice,2 and
Laurent
Gutmann1,*
L.R.M.A., INSERM E0004, Université
Paris VI, 75270 Paris Cedex 06, France,1 and
Medical and Research Services, Case Western University,
Cleveland, Ohio2
Received 20 February 2001/Returned for modification 25 April
2001/Accepted 6 June 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The contribution of penicillin-binding protein 5 (PBP 5) to
intrinsic and acquired
-lactam resistance was investigated by constructing isogenic strains of Enterococcus faecium
producing different PBP 5. The pbp5 genes from three
E. faecium clinical isolates (BM4107, D344, and H80721)
were cloned into the shuttle vector pAT392 and introduced into E. faecium D344S, a spontaneous derivative of E. faecium
D344 highly susceptible to ampicillin due to deletion of
pbp5 (MIC, 0.03 µg/ml). Immunodetection of PBP5 indicated
that cloning of the pbp5 genes into pAT392 resulted in
moderate overproduction of PBP 5 in comparison to wild-type strains.
This difference may be attributed to a difference in gene copy number.
Expression of the pbp5 genes from BM4107 (MIC, 2 µg/ml),
D344 (MIC, 24 µg/ml), and H80721 (MIC, 512 µg/ml) in D344S
conferred relatively low levels of resistance to ampicillin (MICs, 6, 12, and 20 µg/ml, respectively). A methionine-to-alanine substitution
was introduced at position 485 of the BM4107 PBP 5 by site-directed
mutagenesis. In contrast to previous hypotheses based on comparison of
nonisogenic strains, this substitution resulted in only a 2.5-fold
increase in the ampicillin MIC. The reversed-phase high-performance
liquid chromatography muropeptide profiles of D344 and D344S were
similar, indicating that deletion of pbp5 was not
associated with a detectable defect in cell wall synthesis. These
results indicate that pbp5 is a nonessential gene
responsible for intrinsic resistance to moderate levels of ampicillin
and by itself cannot confer high-level resistance.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Enterococcus faecium is intrinsically
resistant to moderate levels of ampicillin by production of the
low-affinity penicillin-binding protein 5 (PBP 5). Bacterial growth
occurs at
-lactam concentrations sufficient to inactivate all the
other PBPs, suggesting that PBP5 is the only transpeptidase required
for peptidoglycan synthesis under such conditions (4, 20).
Acquired resistance to higher levels of ampicillin in clinical isolates
of E. faecium has been associated with increased
production of PBP 5 or decreased affinity for the
-lactam
antibiotics (7, 8, 10, 13, 18, 20, 21). The latter
mechanism was inferred from comparison of the pbp5 genes
from clinical isolates in which amino acid substitutions at specific
positions near or in the conserved motifs of the PBP module were
associated with decreased interaction with
-lactams and expression
of resistance (8, 13, 18, 21). However, the role of the
PBP 5 in the level of resistance was not rigorously established since
isogenic strains were not constructed. In the present study,
pbp5 genes from E. faecium clinical isolates
expressing various levels of ampicillin resistance were cloned into a
shuttle vector and introduced into E. faecium D344S, a
spontaneous mutant in which the chromosomal pbp5 locus is
deleted. Expression of the different pbp5 genes in this host
resulted in similar low levels of ampicillin resistance, indicating
that alterations of PBP 5 alone do not account for acquired high-level
-lactam resistance in E. faecium.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and growth conditions.
The
bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are presented in
Table 1. Strains were grown in brain
heart infusion (BHI) broth or agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.)
at 37°C. The MICs were determined three times on BHI agar using
twofold dilutions of ampicillin and three additional intermediary
concentrations within each twofold dilution (e.g., 16, 20, 24, 28, and
32 µg/ml) (20). An inoculum of approximately
104 CFU per spot was applied with a Steers replicator.
Plates were incubated at 37°C for 18 h. The following
antimicrobial agents were kindly provided: amoxicillin (Smith Kline
Beecham Laboratories, Paris, France), and ceftriaxone (Roche S.A.,
Paris, France).
Molecular biology techniques.
Plasmid DNA isolation,
digestion with restriction endonucleases (Roche Molecular Biochemicals,
Paris, France), ligation of fragments with T4 DNA ligase (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals), and transformation of
Escherichia coli DH5a with recombinant plasmids were
performed by standard methods (3). Genomic DNA of
E. faecium strains was extracted and amplified
(2) with oligodeoxyribonucleotide primers (Oligo Express,
Paris, France) by using a PROGENE thermal cycler (Techne, Cambridge,
United Kingdom).
Plasmid construction.
Plasmids pSF1, pSF2, and pSF3 were
constructed by cloning the PCR-amplified pbp5 genes of
E. faecium BM4107, D344, and H80721, respectively, into the
shuttle vector pAT392. For these constructions, DNA fragments
containing the pbp5 genes were amplified with the Pwo DNA polymerase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and
primers ONJP16 (5'-CGGAATTCGTATTATGCAAGTATCA-3')
and ONJP23
(5'-CGCGGATCCTTATTATTGATAATTTTGGTT-3'). The
amplified fragments were digested with EcoRI and
BamHI (sites underlined), ligated with pUC19 DNA digested
with the same enzymes, and introduced into E. coli DH5a. The
inserts of the recombinant plasmids were sequenced on both DNA strands
(Genome Express, Paris, France). The DNA fragments carrying the
pbp5 genes were subcloned into pAT392 using EcoRI
and BamHI.
Site-directed mutagenesis.
An ATG (Met)-to-GCG (Ala)
mutation was introduced at codon 485 of the pbp5 gene of
BM4107 as previously described (19). In brief, the 3'
terminus of the pbp5 gene of pSF1 was amplified using
primers ONPJ42
(5'-CCGATAATATATATGCGGCACAAGAAACGTT-3') and ONJP23 (above). The PCR fragment (595 bp) was used as a megaprimer with
primer ONJP16 (above) to amplify the entire gene which was cloned into
pUC19 and subcloned into pAT392 using EcoRI and
BamHI, generating pSF4. The entire insert was sequenced to
verify the presence of the expected mutation.
Strain construction.
Plasmids were introduced into E. faecium D344S by electrotransformation (1). Plasmid
DNA from clones selected on gentamicin (100 µg/ml) were prepared and
digested with EcoRI plus BamHI to screen for DNA rearrangements.
Immunodetection of PBP 5.
Strains were grown in BHI broth to
an optical density of 0.5 at 600 nm. Membranes were prepared, proteins
were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis, and Western blotting was performed with polyclonal
antibodies raised to PBP 5, as previously described (18).
Analysis of peptidoglycan structure.
Muropeptides were
prepared from cells grown at mid-exponential phase in BHI broth,
separated by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, and
analyzed by mass spectrometry (14). The respective
abundance of the muropeptides were expressed as a percentage of the
area under all the peaks using baselines connecting the lowest
absorbance values at 210 nm.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Complementation of the pbp5 deletion in E. faecium D344S.
E. faecium D344 is a clinical
isolate of E. faecium resistant to moderate levels of
ampicillin (MIC, 24 µg/ml). E. faecium D344S is a
spontaneous derivative of D344 lacking the entire pbp5 gene
as shown by Southern blot hybridization and PCR analysis with various
primers (data not shown). Deletion of pbp5 was associated with an 800-fold decrease in the MIC of ampicillin (from 24 to 0.03 µg/ml) (Table 2). A similar low MIC was previously
reported for a mutant of Enterococcus hirae harboring a
premature stop codon in pbp5 (12). For
complementation analysis, the pbp5 gene of D344
(pbp5D344) was amplified by PCR and cloned into
the shuttle vector pAT392, generating plasmid pSF2. The amplified
fragment contained the promoter recently identified upstream from the
pbp5 open reading frame by Northern blot and primer
extension analyses (17). Transcription is not expected to
originate from the vector since the P2 promoter
of pAT392 was deleted upon cloning (see Materials and Methods) and
transcription is barely detectable in its absence (1, 2).
Introduction of pSF2(pbp5D344) into D344S
resulted in a 400-fold increase in the level of ampicillin resistance
(Table 2), confirming that pbp5 is the major determinant responsible for intrinsic resistance to ampicillin in D344. Western blot analysis showed that
D344S/pSF2(pbp5D344) produced PBP 5 at a
higher (approximately fourfold) level than the parental strain D344
(Fig. 1). This difference may be attributed to a gene
dosage effect since the pbp5 gene was present at one copy
per chromosome in D344 and on a low-copy-number vector containing the
pAM
1 origin of replication in
D344S/pSF2(pbp5D344) (16). In
spite of the high-level expression of pbp5 in
D344S/pSF2(pbp5D344), the MIC of ampicillin
was twofold lower in comparison to that for the parental strain D344.

View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Western blot detection of PBP 5 in membrane fractions
from various E. faecium strains. Lanes: 1, derivative of
D344S/pSF4(pbp5BM4107M485A)
selected on ampicillin (MIC, 56 µg/ml); 2, D344S/pSF4(pbp5BM4107M485A);
3, derivative of
D344S/pSF1(pb5pBM4107) (MIC, 12 µg/ml); 4, D344S/pSF1 (pb5pBM4107); 5, BM4107;
6, D344S; 7, derivative of
D344S/pSF3(pbp5H80721) (MIC, 128 µg/ml); 8, D344S/pSF3(pbp5H80721); 9, H80721; 10, D344; 11, derivative of D344S/pSF2(pbp5D344) (MIC, 56 µg/ml); 12, D344S/pSF2(pbp5D344).
|
|
Comparison of wild-type pbp5 genes of BM4107, D344, and
H80721.
The complementation test was used to compare the
resistance phenotypes mediated by the PBP 5 from three clinical
isolates with various levels of resistance to ampicillin (Table 2). The pbp5 genes of BM4107, D344, and H80721 were amplified,
cloned into E. coli, and sequenced. The complete deduced
amino acid sequence of the three PBP 5 differed in a total of 28 positions (Table 3). Twelve of the variable positions
were located in the PBP module of the proteins, including position 485, which was reported to play a role in resistance (18, 21).
As previously discussed, the presence of a Met, Ala, or Thr residue at
this position was associated with low-level (BM4107), moderate-level
(D344), or high-level (H80721) ampicillin resistance, respectively
(18). The pbp5 genes were subcloned into
pAT392, and the resulting plasmids were introduced into D344S, leading
to moderate overproduction of the different PBP 5 (Fig. 1) and to 200- to 700-fold increases in the MIC of ampicillin (Table 2). The MIC was
lowest (6 µg/ml) for D344S/pSF1, expressing the pbp5 gene
of the low-level-resistant strain BM4107 (MIC, 2 µg/ml); intermediate
(12 µg/ml) for D344S/pSF2, expressing the pbp5 gene of the
moderately resistant strain D344 (MIC, 24 µg/ml); and highest (20 µg/ml) for D344S/pSF3, expressing the pbp5 gene of the
highly resistant strain H80721 (MIC, 512 µg/ml) (Table 2).
Qualitatively, these results indicate that structural differences in
the PBP 5 of BM4107, D344, and H80721 contribute to the difference in
the level of ampicillin resistance observed for these clinical
isolates. However, structural differences in the PBP 5 appear to play
only a marginal role, since the MIC ranged from 2 to 512 µg/ml for
the clinical isolates and from 6 to 20 µg/ml for derivatives of D344S
expressing the corresponding pbp5 genes. The pbp5
gene of HM80721 did not mediate high-level ampicillin resistance in
D344S in spite of moderate overproduction of the protein (Fig. 1).
Thus, neither the level of expression of
pbp5HM80721 nor the structure of the gene
product can fully account for high-level expression of ampicillin
resistance in HM80721. It may be argued that some accessory factor
required for PBP 5HM80721-mediated high-level ampicillin
resistance was deleted with pbp5 in D344S. This does not
appear to be the case, since introduction of
pSF3(pbp5HM80721) into BM4107 also produced a moderate (fourfold) increase in the MIC of ampicillin (data not
shown).
Expression of the
pbp5 gene of BM4107 conferred a higher
level of resistance to ampicillin after cloning in D344s (MIC, 6
µg/ml) than in the parental strain BM4107 (2 µg/ml). Increased
production of PBP5 (Fig.
1) may be responsible for this
difference
in accordance with previous studies which showed that
increased
amounts of PBP 5 was associated with increased

-lactam
MICs in
both
E. hirae and
E. faecium (
6,
10,
12,
20).
Site-directed mutagenesis of the pbp5 gene of
BM4107.
The presence of an alanine instead of a methionine at
position 485 near the conserved SDN motif (positions 480 to 482) was proposed to play a critical role in PBP 5-mediated high-level ampicillin resistance (18, 21). The corresponding
mutation was introduced into the pbp5 gene of BM4107
(Table 3). The MICs of ampicillin for derivatives of D344S harboring
pSF1(pbp5BM4107) and
pSF4(pbp5BM4107M485A) were 6 and 16 µg/ml, respectively (Table 2). Thus, the amino acid substitution led
to a significant but limited increase in the level of resistance. These
results indicate that the presence of an alanine residue at position
485 cannot account alone for high-level ampicillin resistance, at least
in the context of the PBP5BM4107 sequence.
Selection of variants with increased resistance to ampicillin.
Derivatives of D344S harboring
pSF1(pbp5BM4107),
pSF2(pbp5D344),
pSF3(pbp5H80721), and pSF4
(pbp5BM4107M485A) were selected on
BHI agar containing ampicillin at concentrations twofold higher than
the MICs (Table 2). For all four strains, variants were obtained at a
high frequency (10
4 to 10
5), and the MICs
of ampicillin were increased up to sixfold (Table 2). Western blot
analysis performed for one highly resistant representative of each type
of variant did not reveal any apparent increase in the level of PBP 5 production (Fig. 1). The highest MIC observed for derivatives of
D344S/pSF3(pbp5H80721) (128 µg/ml) was
considerably less than that for clinical isolate HM80721 (512 µg/ml).
Thus, production of PBP5HM80721 in D344S did not restore
the wild-type level of resistance, even after selection of variants
with increased ampicillin resistance.
Structure of the peptidoglycan.
The overall structures of
peptidoglycan from D344 and D344S were very similar, indicating that
PBP 5 has no specific transpeptidase activity different from the other
set of PBPs (Table 4). The only difference was a slight
decrease of the proportion of monomers in D344S. The peptidoglycan of
D344 was also analyzed after growth in the presence of ceftriaxone at
64 µg/ml. This concentration is 10 times higher than that required to
saturate at 50% PBP 1, 2, 3, and 4 but significantly less than that
required to inhibit growth or to saturate PBP 5 at 50% (>256 µg/ml)
(reference 9 and data not shown). Comparison of the
peptidoglycan isolated from D344 grown in the presence or absence of
ceftriaxone did not reveal any significant difference, with the
possible exception of a fourfold increase of the quantity of the
monomer pentapeptide (0.6 versus 2.4%). Thus, PBP 5 was able to
compensate for inhibition of PBP 1, 2, 3, and 4 by ceftriaxone. In
Staphylococcus aureus, saturation of all PBPs except the
low-affinity PBP 2A is associated with a virtual disappearance of
oligomers (5), suggesting that PBP 2A, in contrast to PBP
5, is unable to assume all the transpeptidase functions involved in
peptidoglycan synthesis.
Conclusions.
Analysis of peptidoglycan indicated that the
D,D-transpeptidase activity of the PBPs is largely
redundant in E. faecium, since similar structures were
obtained under conditions under which the full complement of the PBPs
was active, PBP 5 was absent, or all PBPs except PBP 5 were inhibited
by ceftriaxone. In contrast, PBP 5 strikingly differs from other PBPs
by its low affinity for
-lactams (7, 18, 21).
Accordingly, deletion of pbp5 was associated with an
800-fold reduction in the MIC of ampicillin. The deletion was
complemented by a copy of pbp5 cloned on a plasmid, confirming that PBP 5 was responsible for intrinsic resistance. Use of
this complementation test also confirmed that modification of the level
of expression of pbp5 or alterations of the amino acid
sequence of the protein near conserved motifs may lead to increased
resistance to ampicillin. However, neither of these mechanisms could
account alone or in association for the acquired high-level ampicillin
resistance found in the clinical isolates (18). Thus, it
is likely that other factors are necessary to obtain full expression of resistance.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
This work was supported by a grant from INSERM (E0004).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: L.R.M.A./E0004,
Université Paris VI, 15, rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, 75270 Paris Cedex 06, France. Phone: 33-1-42.34.68.63. Fax: 33-1-43.25.68.12. E-mail: laurent.gutmann{at}ccr.jussieu.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Arthur, M.,
F. Depardieu,
H. A. Snaith,
P. E. Reynolds, and P. Courvalin.
1994.
Contribution of VanY D,D-carboxypeptidase to glycopeptide resistance in Enterococcus faecalis by hydrolysis of peptidoglycan precursors.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38:1899-1903[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Arthur, M.,
C. Molinas, and P. Courvalin.
1992.
The VanS-VanR two-component regulatory system controls synthesis of depsipeptide peptidoglycan precursors in Enterococcus faecium BM4147.
J. Bacteriol.
174:2582-2591[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Ausubel, F. M.,
R. Brent,
R. E. Kingston,
D. D. Moore,
J. G. Seidman,
J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl (ed.).
1987.
Current protocols in molecular biology.
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, n.y.
|
| 4.
|
Canepari, P.,
M. M. Lleo,
G. Cornaglia,
R. Fontana, and G. Satta.
1986.
In Streptococcus faecium penicillin-binding protein 5 alone is sufficient for cell growth at sub-maximal but not at maximal rate.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
132:625-631[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
de Jonge, B. L. M., and A. Tomasz.
1993.
Abnormal peptidoglycan produced in a methicillin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus grown in the presence of methicillin: functional role for penicillin-binding protein 2A in cell wall synthesis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
37:342-346[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Fontana, R.,
M. Aldegheri,
M. Ligozzi,
H. Lopez,
A. Sucari, and G. Satta.
1994.
Overproduction of a low-affinity penicillin-binding protein and high-level ampicillin resistance in Enterococcus faecium.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38:1980-1983[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Fontana, R.,
R. Cerini,
P. Longoni,
A. Grossato, and P. Canepari.
1983.
Identification of a streptococcal penicillin-binding protein that reacts very slowly with penicillin.
J. Bacteriol.
155:1343-1350[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Fontana, R.,
M. Ligozzi,
F. Pittaluga, and G. Satta.
1996.
Intrinsic penicillin resistance in enterococci.
Microb. Drug Resist.
2:209-213[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Gutmann, L.,
S. Al-Obeid,
D. Billot-Klein,
M. L. Guerrier, and E. Collatz.
1994.
Synergy and resistance to synergy between -lactam antibiotics and glycopeptides against glycopeptide-resistant strains of Enterococcus faecium.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38:824-829[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Klare, I.,
A. C. Rodloff,
J. Wagner,
W. Witte, and R. Hakenbeck.
1992.
Overproduction of a penicillin-binding protein is not the only mechanism of penicillin resistance in Enterococcus faecium.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
36:783-787[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Leclercq, R.,
E. Derlot,
M. Weber,
J. Duval, and P. Courvalin.
1989.
Transferable vancomycin and teicoplanin resistance in Enterococcus faecium.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
33:10-15[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Ligozzi, M.,
F. Pittaluga, and R. Fontana.
1993.
Identification of a genetic element (psr) which negatively controls expression of Enterococcus hirae penicillin-binding protein 5.
J. Bacteriol.
175:2046-2051[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Ligozzi, M.,
F. Pittaluga, and R. Fontana.
1996.
Modification of penicillin-binding protein 5 associated with high-level ampicillin resistance in Enterococcus faecium.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
40:354-357[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Mainardi, J. L.,
R. Legrand,
M. Arthur,
B. Schoot,
J. van Heijenoort, and L. Gutmann.
2000.
Novel mechanism of -lactam resistance due to by-pass of DD-transpeptidation in Enterococcus faecium.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:16490-16496[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Norrander, J.,
T. Kempe, and J. Messing.
1983.
Construction of improved M13 vectors using oligodeoxynucleotide-directed mutagenesis.
Gene
26:101-106[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Poyart, C., and P. Trieu-Cuot.
1997.
A broad-host-range mobilizable shuttle vector for the construction of transcriptional fusions to beta-galactosidase in gram-positive bacteria.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
156:193-198[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Rice, L. B.,
L. L. Carias,
R. Hutton-Thomas,
F. Sifaoui,
L. Gutmann, and S. D. Rudin.
2001.
Penicillin-binding protein 5 and expression of ampicillin resistance in Enterococcus faecium.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
45:1480-1486[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Rybkine, T.,
J. L. Mainardi,
W. Sougakoff,
E. Collatz, and L. Gutmann.
1998.
Penicillin-binding protein 5 sequence alterations in clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium with different levels of beta-lactam resistance.
J. Infect. Dis.
178:159-163[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Smith, A. M., and K. P. Klugman.
1997.
"Megaprimer" method of PCR-based mutagenesis: the concentration of megaprimer is a critical factor.
BioTechniques
22:438-442[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Williamson, R.,
C. le Bouguenec,
L. Gutmann, and T. Horaud.
1985.
One or two low affinity penicillin-binding proteins may be responsible for the range of susceptibility of Enterococcus faecium to benzylpenicillin.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
131:1933-1940[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Zorzi, W.,
X. Y. Zhou,
O. Dardenne,
J. Lamotte,
D. Raze,
J. Pierre,
L. Gutmann, and J. Coyette.
1996.
Structure of the low-affinity penicillin-binding protein 5 PBP5fm in wild-type and highly penicillin-resistant strains of Enterococcus faecium.
J. Bacteriol.
178:4948-4957[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2001, p. 2594-2597, Vol. 45, No. 9
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.9.2594-2597.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Poeta, P., Costa, D., Igrejas, G., Saenz, Y., Zarazaga, M., Rodrigues, J., Torres, C.
(2007). Polymorphisms of the pbp5 gene and correlation with ampicillin resistance in Enterococcus faecium isolates of animal origin. J Med Microbiol
56: 236-240
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Leimanis, S., Hoyez, N., Hubert, S., Laschet, M., Sauvage, E., Brasseur, R., Coyette, J.
(2006). PBP5 Complementation of a PBP3 Deficiency in Enterococcus hirae.. J. Bacteriol.
188: 6298-6307
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nallapareddy, S. R., Singh, K. V., Murray, B. E.
(2006). Construction of Improved Temperature-Sensitive and Mobilizable Vectors and Their Use for Constructing Mutations in the Adhesin-Encoding acm Gene of Poorly Transformable Clinical Enterococcus faecium Strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
72: 334-345
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Arbeloa, A., Hugonnet, J.-E., Sentilhes, A.-C., Josseaume, N., Dubost, L., Monsempes, C., Blanot, D., Brouard, J.-P., Arthur, M.
(2004). Synthesis of Mosaic Peptidoglycan Cross-bridges by Hybrid Peptidoglycan Assembly Pathways in Gram-positive Bacteria. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 41546-41556
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rice, L. B., Bellais, S., Carias, L. L., Hutton-Thomas, R., Bonomo, R. A., Caspers, P., Page, M. G. P., Gutmann, L.
(2004). Impact of Specific pbp5 Mutations on Expression of {beta}-Lactam Resistance in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 3028-3032
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Arbeloa, A., Segal, H., Hugonnet, J.-E., Josseaume, N., Dubost, L., Brouard, J.-P., Gutmann, L., Mengin-Lecreulx, D., Arthur, M.
(2004). Role of Class A Penicillin-Binding Proteins in PBP5-Mediated {beta}-Lactam Resistance in Enterococcus faecalis. J. Bacteriol.
186: 1221-1228
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mohn, S. C., Ulvik, A., Jureen, R., Willems, R. J. L., Top, J., Leavis, H., Harthug, S., Langeland, N.
(2004). Duplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Rapid Detection of Ampicillin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 556-560
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Comenge, Y., Quintiliani, R. Jr., Li, L., Dubost, L., Brouard, J.-P., Hugonnet, J.-E., Arthur, M.
(2003). The CroRS Two-Component Regulatory System Is Required for Intrinsic {beta}-Lactam Resistance in Enterococcus faecalis. J. Bacteriol.
185: 7184-7192
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sapunaric, F., Franssen, C., Stefanic, P., Amoroso, A., Dardenne, O., Coyette, J.
(2003). Redefining the Role of psr in {beta}-Lactam Resistance and Cell Autolysis of Enterococcus hirae. J. Bacteriol.
185: 5925-5935
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jureen, R., Top, J., Mohn, S. C., Harthug, S., Langeland, N., Willems, R. J. L.
(2003). Molecular Characterization of Ampicillin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Isolates from Hospitalized Patients in Norway. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 2330-2336
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rohrer, S., Berger-Bachi, B.
(2003). FemABX Peptidyl Transferases: a Link between Branched-Chain Cell Wall Peptide Formation and {beta}-Lactam Resistance in Gram-Positive Cocci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 837-846
[Full Text]
-
Goffin, C., Ghuysen, J.-M.
(2002). Biochemistry and Comparative Genomics of SxxK Superfamily Acyltransferases Offer a Clue to the Mycobacterial Paradox: Presence of Penicillin-Susceptible Target Proteins versus Lack of Efficiency of Penicillin as Therapeutic Agent. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
66: 702-738
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mainardi, J.-L., Morel, V., Fourgeaud, M., Cremniter, J., Blanot, D., Legrand, R., Frehel, C., Arthur, M., van Heijenoort, J., Gutmann, L.
(2002). Balance between Two Transpeptidation Mechanisms Determines the Expression of beta -Lactam Resistance in Enterococcus faecium. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 35801-35807
[Abstract]
[Full Text]