Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wallace, R. J. Articles by Wilson, R. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wallace, R. J., Jr. Articles by Wilson, R. W.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2002, p. 3164-3167, Vol. 46, No. 10
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.10.3164-3167.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of the In Vitro Activity of the Glycylcycline Tigecycline (Formerly GAR-936) with Those of Tetracycline, Minocycline, and Doxycycline against Isolates of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria

Richard J. Wallace Jr.,^* Barbara A. Brown-Elliott, Christopher J. Crist, Linda Mann, and Rebecca W. Wilson

Department of Microbiology, University of Texas Health Center, Tyler, Texas

Received 14 March 2002/ Returned for modification 11 April 2002/ Accepted 24 June 2002

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
We compared the in vitro activity of the glycylcycline tigecycline (formerly GAR-936) with those of tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline by broth microdilution against 76 isolates belonging to seven species of rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) and 45 isolates belonging to five species of slowly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). By using a resistance breakpoint of >4 µg/ml for tigecycline and >8 µg/ml for tetracycline, all RGM were highly susceptible to tigecycline, with inhibition of 50% of isolates at 0.12 µg/ml and inhibition of 90% of isolates at 0.25 µg/ml for Mycobacterium abscessus and inhibition of both 50 and 90% of isolates at 0.12 µg/ml for M. chelonae and the M. fortuitum group. The MICs of tigecycline were the same for tetracycline-resistant and -susceptible strains, and RGM isolates were 4- to 11-fold more susceptible to tigecycline than to the tetracyclines. In contrast, no slowly growing NTM were susceptible to tigecycline, and isolates of M. marinum and M. kansasii were less susceptible to this agent than to minocycline. This new antimicrobial offers exciting therapeutic potential for the RGM, especially for isolates of the M. chelonae-M. abscessus group, against which the activities of the currently available drugs are limited.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Treatment of infections due to rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) remains difficult, in part because of resistance to the first-line antituberculous agents and also in part because of resistance to almost all antibacterial agents (3, 21). The only drugs with activity against all three major pathogenic species (Mycobacterium chelonae, M. abscessus, and M. fortuitum) are amikacin (13) and clarithromycin (4). In vitro studies with prior glycylcyclines (N,N-dimethylglycylamido-minocycline [DMG-MINO] and N,N-dimethylglycylamido-6-demethyl-6-deoxytetracycline [DMG-DMDOT]) have shown this class of agents to be extremely active against this group of organisms, including tetracycline-resistant strains (1, 3). The latest glycylcycline, tigecycline (GAR-936), has shown excellent activity against many tetracycline-resistant bacterial species (1, 8, 17; R. N. Jones, A. C. Gales, L. M. Deshpande, D. M. Johnson, and D. J. Biedenbach, poster 407, 39th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 1999). With this in mind, we undertook a comparative study of the in vitro susceptibilities of multiple species of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) to tetracycline, minocycline, doxycycline, and tigecycline.

(A portion of this study was presented at the 41st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 16 to 19 December 2001, Chicago, Ill.)

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Organisms. Clinical mycobacterial isolates submitted to the Mycobacterial/Nocardia Laboratory at The University of Texas Health Center for susceptibility testing and selected reference strains were chosen for testing. Clinical isolates were tested upon receipt in the laboratory, while the reference strains were taken from frozen stocks stored at -70°C in Trypticase soy broth with 15% glycerol. This included 76 clinical isolates of RGM of the M. fortuitum group (n = 26), M. abscessus (n = 20), M. chelonae (n = 26), M. immunogenum (n = 1), and the M. smegmatis group (n = 1 isolate each of M. smegmatis sensu stricto, M. wolinskyi, and M. goodii). American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) reference or type strains of RGM included M. fortuitum ATCC 6841^T, M. peregrinum ATCC 14467^T, the current NCCLS-recommended susceptibility control strain, M. peregrinum ATCC 700686 (10), M. fortuitum third biovariant sorbitol-positive strain ATCC 49403 (proposed species M. neworleansense), and M. fortuitum third biovariant sorbitol-negative strain ATCC 49404 (proposed as M. bonickei) (M. F. Schinsky, M. P. Douglas, A. G. Steigerwalt, R. W. Wilson, M. M. Floyd, M. I. Daneshvar, B. A. Brown-Elliott, R. J. Wallace, Jr., M. M. McNeil, D. J. Brenner, and J. M. Brown, unpublished data).

We also tested 45 isolates of slowly growing NTM that included 11 M. avium complex, 10 M. lentiflavum, 11 M. kansasii, 11 M. marinum, 1 M. xenopi, and 1 M. simiae complex isolates for their susceptibilities to these agents.

Isolates of the M. fortuitum group, M. chelonae, and M. abscessus were identified to the species level by using drug susceptibility patterns (3, 11) or by PCR-restriction enzyme analysis (PRA) of a 439-bp sequence (Telenti fragment) of the 65-kDa hsp gene (12, 15). The remaining RGM species were identified only by PRA (2, 23). Isolates of slowly growing NTM were identified by use of a commercial DNA-RNA probe (Accu-Probe) (Gen-Probe, Inc) or PRA of the 65-kDa hsp gene (15).

Susceptibility testing. The isolates were tested for their susceptibilities to tetracycline, minocycline, doxycycline, and tigecycline (formerly GAR-936; Wyeth-Ayerst, Pearl River, N.Y.). MICs were determined by broth microdilution and a recently published tentative NCCLS standard method for mycobacterial susceptibility testing of RGM and slowly growing NTM (10). The resistance breakpoints were 16 µg/ml for tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline (9). For slowly growing NTM, the NCCLS document does not deal with breakpoints for tetracycline, and breakpoints for doxycycline and minocycline are given only for M. marinum. The breakpoints for the three tetracyclines used here are those for bacterial species that grow aerobically (9). The resistance breakpoint tentatively recommended by the manufacturer for tigecycline is 8 µg/ml.

Quality control. Quality control for the tetracyclines and tigecycline were performed by using Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 and suggested quality control ranges recommended by the NCCLS for the tetracyclines or the manufacturer for tigecycline (9). Acceptable MIC ranges for S. aureus ATCC 29213 are 0.03 to 0.12 µg/ml for tigecycline, 0.12 to 0.5 µg/ml for doxycycline, 0.06 to 0.5 µg/ml for minocycline, and 0.25 to 1 µg/ml for tetracycline. All quality control results were within the acceptable ranges.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Results for the clinical isolates of the common pathogenic species of the RGM are shown in Tables 1 and 2. In general, the MICs of tigecycline for all isolates were very low, with comparable values for tetracycline-susceptible and tetracycline-resistant strains.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. MIC ranges, concentrations that inhibits 50 and 90% of strains, and percentage of strains susceptible for tigecycline (GAR-936) and three tetracyclines for 72 isolates of RGMa

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. MIC ranges and concentrations of tetracycline, minocycline, and doxycycline and the new glycylcycline tigecycline (GAR-936) that inhibit 50 and 90% of 50 clinical tetracycline-resistanta isolates of RGM

For tetracycline-susceptible strains, tigecycline was approximately 4 dilutions more active than the older tetracyclines. For 15 of 16 tetracycline-susceptible M. fortuitum strains, the tetracycline MICs were 0.5 to 8.0 µg/ml, with the mode tetracycline MIC being 0.5 µg/ml. In contrast, for 15 of the 16 isolates the tigecycline MICs were 0.12 µg/ml, with the mode tigecycline MIC being 0.06 µg/ml (16-fold more active than tetracycline) (data not shown). Similar results were seen with M. chelonae and a single strain of M. immunogenum. For the four tetracycline-susceptible isolates tetracycline MICs were 1 to 4 µg/ml (mode, 4 µg/ml), while the tigecycline MICs for the same strains ranged from 0.06 to 0.25 µg/ml (mode, 0.06 µg/ml) (data not shown). Minocycline and doxycycline were more active against the tetracycline-susceptible strains, with modes of 0.12 and 0.25 µg/ml, respectively. For approximately 50% of the isolates, however, minocycline MICs were in the range of 0.25 to 4. 0 µg/ml, which were 3 to 6 dilutions higher than those of tigecycline.

Results for the five RGM reference strains are given in Table 3. Included are MICs of two glycylcyclines for these strains published previously (3). The activities of tigecycline against these strains were the same as those of DMG-DMDOT and comparable to those of DMG-MINO, with results similar to those achieved for the clinical isolates. This is in contrast to the results for staphylococcal species, against which minocycline is 1 to 4 dilutions more active than tigecycline (1).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 3. MICs of tetracycline, minocycline, doxycycline DMG-DMDOT, DMG-MINO, and tigecycline for reference strains of RGM

All 33 strains of six species of slowly growing NTM were resistant to tigecycline (MICs, 16 to >32 µg/ml) (Table 4). Minocycline was more active than tigecycline against the closely related photochromogenic species M. marinum and M. kansasii. Single isolates each of M. xenopi and M. simiae were also resistant to tigecycline (MICs, 16 and >32 µg/ml, respectively) (data not shown in Table 4). Additional numbers of test isolates of the latter two species are needed to establish the apparent lack of activity of tigecycline.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 4. MIC ranges, concentrations that inhibits 50 and 90% of strains tested, and percentage of strains susceptible for tigecycline (GAR-936) and three tetracyclines against 43 isolates of three species of slowing growing mycobacteriaa

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The tetracyclines have been highly popular for antimicrobial therapy because of their activities against numerous bacterial organisms, although their use has declined dramatically in the past decade because of drug resistance. Some of the clinical isolates against which tetracyclines exhibit activities include some species of RGM such as M. fortuitum, M. smegmatis, and M. mucogenicum (6, 20, 21, 22), 50% or more clinical isolates of which are susceptible. However, at clinically achievable levels these agents are less effective against other common pathogenic species of RGM such as M. chelonae (26% of isolates are susceptible to doxycycline at 4 µg/ml) and M. abscessus (4% of isolates are susceptible to doxycycline at 4 µg/ml) (13, 18). Preliminary studies suggest that these species contain a number of resistance determinants that likely play a role in this resistance (11).

The introduction of the glycylcyclines represents a significant advance in the tetracyclines, as the glycylcyclines are unaffected by the major genetic mechanisms (efflux, ribosomal protection) responsible for tetracycline resistance among bacterial species (14, 16). Previous studies with two early glycylcyclines, DMG-MINO and DMG-DMDOT, showed that they have excellent in vitro activities against all species of RGM including the members of the M. fortuitum group, M. chelonae, M. abscessus, and M. mucogenicum (3). These results were comparable to the results obtained in the present study with tigecycline (3). The MIC at which 50% of isolates are inhibited (MIC₅₀) and the MIC₉₀ of DMG-DMDOT for the 30 isolates of the M. fortuitum group were 0.06 and 0.125 µg/ml, respectively, values which are the same as those for the 26 isolates tested in the present study against tigecycline. The MICs of the three glycylcyclines for the M. fortuitum reference strains (Table 3) are also similar or identical. For 60 isolates of M. abscessus, the MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ of DMG-DOT were 0.125 and 0.25 µg/ml, respectively (3), values which are also the same as those of tigecycline for the 20 isolates tested in the present study.

The activity of tigecycline could be highly useful clinically, especially against RGM species causing serious disease, before susceptibilities are available. Amikacin is the only agent with activity against all RGM species, but it has major renal and auditory toxicities. Tigecycline also has much anticipated usefulness against M. abscessus isolates causing chronic lung disease. The latter disease is incurable with currently available drugs (19). It is increasingly problematic in patients with cystic fibrosis, in whom subsequent transplantation with its associated immune suppression can result in disseminated disease (5, 7).

In contrast, tigecycline appears to have no in vitro activity against any of the species of slowly growing NTM studied, including those species (M. marinum, M. kansasii) that were minocycline susceptible at the currently suggested resistance breakpoints. Experience with MIC testing and specific MIC breakpoints is limited for many slowly growing species, however, especially less commonly encountered species such as M. xenopi and M. simiae. This shortcoming will require additional future studies, an observation recognized in the recent NCCLS document on mycobacterial susceptibility testing (10).

 
This study was supported in part by a grant from Wyeth-Ayerst. We gratefully acknowledge Wyeth-Ayerst Research and Raymond Testa for financial support and advice.

We also thank Joanne Woodring for preparation of the manuscript.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology at the University of Texas Health Center, 11937 U.S. Hwy. 271, Tyler, TX 75708. Phone: (903) 877-7680. Fax: (903) 877-7652. E-mail: richard.wallace{at}uthct.edu.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1
1. Boucher, H. W., C. B. Wennersten, and G. M. Eliopoulos. 2000. In vitro activities of the glycylcycline GAR-936 against gram-positive bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2225-2229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
2. Brown, B. A., B. Springer, V. A. Steingrube, R. W. Wilson, G. E. Pfyffer, M. J. Garcia, M. C. Menendez, B. Rodriguez-Salgado, K. C. Jost, S. H. Chiu, G. O. Onyi, E. C. Böttger, and R. J. Wallace, Jr. 1999. Description of Mycobacterium wolinskyi and Mycobacterium goodii, two new rapidly growing species related to Mycobacterium smegmatis and associated with human wound infections: a cooperative study from the International Working Group on Mycobacterial Taxonomy. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 49:1493-1511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3
3. Brown, B. A., R. J. Wallace, Jr., and G. O. Onyi. 1996. Activities of the glycylcyclines N,N-dimethylglycylamido-minocycline and N,N-dimethylglycylamido-6-demethyl-6-deoxytetracycline against Nocardia spp. and tetracycline-resistant isolates of rapidly growing mycobacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:874-878.[Abstract]
4
4. Brown, B. A., R. J. Wallace, Jr., G. Onyi, V. DeRosas, and R. J. Wallace III. 1992. Activities of four macrolides including clarithromycin against Mycobacterium fortuitum, Mycobacterium chelonae, and Mycobacterium chelonae-like organisms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:180-184.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Cullen, A. R., C. L. Cannon, E. J. Mark, and A. A. Colin. 2000. Mycobacterium abscessus infection in cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 161:641-645.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Dalovisio, J. R., G. A. Pankey, R. J. Wallace, Jr., and D. B. Jones. 1981. Clinical usefulness of amikacin and doxycycline in the treatment of infection due to Mycobacterium fortuitum and Mycobacterium chelonei. Rev. Infect. Dis. 3:1068-1074.[Medline]
7
7. Fauroux, B., B. Delaisi, A. Clément, C. Saizou, D. Moissenet, C. Truffot-Pernot, G. Tournier, and H. Vu Thien. 1997. Mycobacterial lung disease in cystic fibrosis: a prospective study. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 16:354-358.[CrossRef][Medline]
8
8. Goldstein, E. J. C., D. M. Citron, C. V. Merriam, Y. Warren, and K. Tyrrell. 2000. Comparative in vitro activities of tigecycline against aerobic and anaerobic animal and human bite wound pathogens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2747-2751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. NCCLS. 2001. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 11th informational supplement, M100-S11. NCCLS, Wayne, Pa.
10
10. NCCLS. 2000. Susceptibility testing of mycobacteria, nocardia and other aerobic actinomycetes; tentative standard M24-T2, 2nd ed. NCCLS, Wayne, Pa.
11
11. Pang, Y., B. A. Brown, V. A. Steingrube, R. J. Wallace, Jr., and M. C. Roberts. 1994. Tetracycline resistance determinants in Mycobacterium and Streptomyces species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:1408-1412.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12
12. Steingrube, V. A., J. L. Gibson, B. A. Brown, Y. Zhang, R. W. Wilson, M. Rajagopalan, and R. J. Wallace, Jr. 1995. PCR amplification and restriction endonuclease analysis of a 65-kilodalton heat shock protein gene sequence for taxonomic separation of rapidly growing mycobacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:149-153.[Abstract]
13
13. Swenson, J. M., R. J. Wallace, Jr., V. A. Silcox, and C. Thornsberry. 1985. Antimicrobial susceptibility of five subgroups of Mycobacterium fortuitum and Mycobacterium chelonae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 28:807-811.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14
14. Tally, F. T., G. A. Ellestad, and R. T. Testa. 1995. Glycylcyclines: a new generation of tetracyclines. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 35:449-452.[Free Full Text]
15
15. Telenti, A., F. Marchesi, M. Balz, F. Bally, E. C. Böttger, and T. Bodmer. 1993. Rapid identification of mycobacteria to the species level by polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:175-178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16
16. Testa, R. T., P. J. Petersen, N. V. Jacobus, P. E. Sum, V. J. Lee, and F. P. Tally. 1993. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of the glycylcyclines, a new class of semisynthetic tetracyclines. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:2270-2277.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17
17. van Ogtrop, M. L., D. Andes, T. J. Stamstad, B. Conklin, W. J. Weiss, W. A. Craig, and O. Vesga. 2000. In vivo pharmacodynamic activities of two glycylcyclines (tigecycline and WAY 152,288) against various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:943-949.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18
18. Wallace, R. J., Jr., B. A. Brown, and G. Onyi. 1992. Skin, soft tissue, and bone infections due to Mycobacterium chelonae subspecies chelonae—importance of prior corticosteroid therapy, frequency of disseminated infections, and resistance to oral antimicrobials other than clarithromycin. J. Infect. Dis. 166:405-412.[Medline]
19
19. Wallace, R. J., Jr., J. L. Cook, J. Glassroth, D. E. Griffith, K. N. Olivier, and F. Gordin. 1997. American Thoracic Society Statement: diagnosis and treatment of disease caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria. Am. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 156:S1-S25.
20
20. Wallace, R. J., Jr., D. R. Nash, M. Tsukamura, Z. M. Blackock, and V. A. Silcox. 1988. Human disease due to Mycobacterium smegmatis. J. Infect. Dis. 158:52-59.[Medline]
21
21. Wallace, R. J., Jr., V. A. Silcox, M. Tsukamura, B. A. Brown, J. O. Kilburn, W. R. Butler, and G. Onyi. 1993. Clinical significance, biochemical features, and susceptibility patterns of sporadic isolates of the Mycobacterium chelonae-like organism. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:3231-3239.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22
22. Wallace, R. J., Jr., J. M. Swenson, V. A. Silcox, and M. G. Bullen. 1985. Treatment of non-pulmonary infections due to Mycobacterium fortuitum and Mycobacterium chelonei on the basis of in vitro susceptibilities. J. Infect. Dis. 152:500-514.[Medline]
23
23. Wilson, R. W., V. A. Steingrube, E. C. Böttger, B. Springer, B. A. Brown-Elliott, V. Vincent, K. C. Jost, Jr., Y. Zhang, M. J. Garcia, S. H. Chiu, G. O. Onyi, H. Rossmoore, D. R. Nash, and R. J. Wallace, Jr. 2001. Mycobacterium immunogenum sp. nov., a novel species related to Mycobacterium abscessus and associated with clinical disease, pseudo-outbreaks, and contaminated metalworking fluids: an international cooperative study on mycobacterial taxonomy. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51:1751-1764.[Abstract]

---

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2002, p. 3164-3167, Vol. 46, No. 10
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.10.3164-3167.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Salvatore, C. M., Techasaensiri, C., Tagliabue, C., Katz, K., Leos, N., Gomez, A. M., McCracken, G. H., Hardy, R. D. (2009). Tigecycline Therapy Significantly Reduces the Concentrations of Inflammatory Pulmonary Cytokines and Chemokines in a Murine Model of Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 1546-1551 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fernandez-Roblas, R., Martin-de-Hijas, N. Z., Fernandez-Martinez, A. I., Garcia-Almeida, D., Gadea, I., Esteban, J. (2008). In Vitro Activities of Tigecycline and 10 Other Antimicrobials against Nonpigmented Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 4184-4186 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Slover, C. M, Rodvold, K. A, Danziger, L. H (2007). Tigecycline: A Novel Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobial. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 41: 965-972 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Van Wart, S. A., Owen, J. S., Ludwig, E. A., Meagher, A. K., Korth-Bradley, J. M., Cirincione, B. B. (2006). Population Pharmacokinetics of Tigecycline in Patients with Complicated Intra-Abdominal or Skin and Skin Structure Infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 3701-3707 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kasbekar, N. (2006). Tigecycline: A new glycylcycline antimicrobial agent.. Am J Health Syst Pharm 63: 1235-1243 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bradford, P. A., Petersen, P. J., Young, M., Jones, C. H., Tischler, M., O'Connell, J. (2005). Tigecycline MIC Testing by Broth Dilution Requires Use of Fresh Medium or Addition of the Biocatalytic Oxygen-Reducing Reagent Oxyrase To Standardize the Test Method. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 3903-3909 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pankey, G. A. (2005). Tigecycline. J Antimicrob Chemother 56: 470-480 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Muralidharan, G., Micalizzi, M., Speth, J., Raible, D., Troy, S. (2005). Pharmacokinetics of Tigecycline after Single and Multiple Doses in Healthy Subjects. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 220-229 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Yang, S.-C., Hsueh, P.-R., Lai, H.-C., Teng, L.-J., Huang, L.-M., Chen, J.-M., Wang, S.-K., Shie, D.-C., Ho, S.-W., Luh, K.-T. (2003). High Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance in Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria in Taiwan. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1958-1962 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wallace, R. J. Articles by Wilson, R. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wallace, R. J., Jr. Articles by Wilson, R. W.