This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pfaller, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Diekema, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pfaller, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Diekema, D. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2002, p. 3518-3521, Vol. 46, No. 11
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.11.3518-3521.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro Activities of 5-Fluorocytosine against 8,803 Clinical Isolates of Candida spp.: Global Assessment of Primary Resistance Using National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Susceptibility Testing Methods

M. A. Pfaller,1,2* S. A. Messer,1 L. Boyken,1 H. Huynh,1 R. J. Hollis,1 and D. J. Diekema1,3

Departments of Pathology,1 Epidemiology,2 Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, and College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa 522423

Received 10 May 2002/ Returned for modification 16 July 2002/ Accepted 5 August 2002


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
We determined the in vitro activity of flucytosine (5-fluorocytosine [5FC]) against 8,803 clinical isolates of Candida spp. (18 species) obtained from more than 200 medical centers worldwide between 1992 and 2001. The MICs were determined by broth microdilution tests performed according to NCCLS guidelines by using RPMI 1640 as the test medium and the following interpretive breakpoints: susceptible (S), <=4 µg/ml; intermediate (I), 8 to 16 µg/ml; resistant (R), >=32 µg/ml. 5FC was very active against the 8,803 Candida isolates (MIC90, 1 µg/ml), 95% S. A total of 99 to 100% of C. glabrata (MIC90, 0.12 µg/ml), C. parapsilosis (MIC90, 0.25 µg/ml), C. dubliniensis (MIC90, 0.12 µg/ml), C. guilliermondii (MIC90, 0.5 µg/ml), and C. kefyr (MIC90, 1 µg/ml) were susceptible to 5FC at the NCCLS breakpoint. C. albicans (MIC90, 1 µg/ml; 97% S) and C. tropicalis (MIC90, 1 µg/ml; 92% S) were only slightly less susceptible. In contrast, C. krusei was the least susceptible species: 5% S; MIC90, 32 µg/ml. Primary resistance to 5FC is very uncommon among Candida spp. (95% S, 2% I, and 3% R), with the exception of C. krusei (5% S, 67% I, and 28% R). The in vitro activity of 5FC, combined with previous data demonstrating a prolonged post-antifungal effect (2.5 to 4 h) and concentration-independent activity (optimized at 4x MIC), suggest that 5FC could be used in lower doses to reduce host toxicity while maintaining antifungal efficacy.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
The recent development of several new systemically active agents for the treatment of invasive candidiasis promises to offer improved coverage of this important infectious disease (10, 12, 32). Although new anti-infective agents are always met with great enthusiasm, currently available agents should not be ignored (2, 15). New approaches that take into account the in vitro susceptibility of contemporary isolates determined by standardized methods (24, 26, 30), coupled with rational pharmacodynamic dosing that optimizes efficacies and limits toxicities of currently licensed agents, may provide effective, low-cost therapy with more immediate impact (2, 15).

Flucytosine (5-fluorocytosine [5FC]) has been used to treat candidiasis and other invasive mycoses since 1968 (36). Although not used as monotherapy, 5FC may be a useful adjunct to amphotericin B or azoles in the treatment of hematogenous candidiasis (11, 29, 38). Despite a general consensus regarding the clinical efficacy of 5FC when used in combination with amphotericin B (11), clinicians are often hesitant to use 5FC due to concerns about toxicity (13, 39) and either primary or secondary resistance (8, 22, 34, 35, 39). Although primary resistance to 5FC is stated to occur among 10 to 15% of Candida albicans isolates and even higher among other Candida species (31), there is very little recent data explicitly addressing this issue by using the standardized National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) antifungal susceptibility testing method (24) against a large geographically diverse collection of contemporary clinical isolates of Candida spp. (6, 9).

Over the past 9 years (1992 to 2001) we have determined the in vitro activity of 5FC by using NCCLS broth microdilution methods against more than 8,000 incident Candida isolates obtained from blood, normally sterile body fluids, or other invasive sites and contributed by more than 200 hospitals worldwide. We report this experience and emphasize the relationship between the MIC distributions of the various species and the recently documented pharmacodynamic characteristics of 5FC with respect to Candida spp. (2, 21). We present here the largest experience with 5FC tested by NCCLS reference methods.


arrow
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 
Organisms. We tested 8,803 clinical Candida isolates obtained from more than 200 medical centers worldwide. The collection included 5,208 C. albicans, 1,267 C. glabrata, 1,047 C. parapsilosis, 759 C. tropicalis, 184 C. krusei, 90 C. dubliniensis, 100 C. guilliermondii, 82 C. lusitaniae, 17 C. famata, and 15 C. kefyr strains, as well as 34 other Candida spp., including C. lipolytica (8 isolates), C. rugosa (8 isolates), C. pelliculosa (6 isolates), C. lambica (2 isolates), C. inconspicua (3 isolates), C. sake (2 isolates), C. norvegensis (1 isolate), C. zeylanoides (1 isolate), and Candida spp. not further identified (2 isolates). These were all consecutive incident (first isolate from each patient episode) clinical isolates collected between 1992 and 2001, and more than 80% of them were from blood or normally sterile body fluids. The C. dubliniensis isolates were from mucosal sites. Isolates were identified by standard methods (40) and stored as water suspensions until they were used. Prior to testing each isolate was passaged on potato dextrose agar (Remel, Lenexa, Kans.) and CHROMagar (Hardy Laboratories, Santa Monica, Calif.) to ensure purity and viability.

Antifungal agents. A standard antifungal powder of 5FC was obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, Mo.). A stock solution (1,000 µg/ml) was prepared in water, and serial twofold dilutions were prepared exactly as outlined in NCCLS document M27-A (24). The test medium was RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma) buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.165 M morpholinepropanesulfonic acid buffer (Sigma). Aliquots (100 µg) of each 5FC dilution at 2x final concentrations were dispensed into the wells of plastic microdilution trays by suing a Quick Spense II System (Dynatech Laboratories, Chantilly, Va.). The trays were sealed and frozen at -70°C until they were used.

Antifungal susceptibility studies. Broth microdilution testing was performed in accordance with NCCLS guidelines (24). The inoculum suspension was prepared by the spectrophotometric method of inoculum preparation and with a final inoculum of (1.5 ± 1.0) x 103 cells per ml. A 100-µl yeast inoculum was added to each well of the microdilution trays. The final concentrations of 5FC ranged from 0.12 to 128 µg/ml. The trays were incubated at 35°C, and the MIC endpoints were read after 48 h of incubation. Drug- and yeast-free controls were included.

After incubation, the MICs of 5FC were read at the lowest concentration at which a prominent decrease (ca. 50%) in turbidity relative to the growth control well was observed (24). Quality control was ensured by testing the NCCLS-recommended strains C. krusei ATCC 6258 and C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 (7, 24).

The interpretive criteria for susceptibility to 5FC were those published by Rex et al. (28) and the NCCLS (24): susceptible (S), <=4 µg/ml; intermediate (I), 8 to 16 µg/ml; resistant (R), >=32 µg/ml.


arrow
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 
Table 1 summarizes the in vitro susceptibility of 8,803 Candida isolates to 5FC. The results are presented by species in a continuous fashion as cumulative percentages of susceptible organisms at each concentration of 5FC throughout the full dilution series. This manner of presentation facilitates comparison of MIC distributions among species between various studies that used the same methodology and makes the data more generalizable since continuous data are not restricted by interpretive criteria that may vary by nation or by international consensus groups (19, 23).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. In vitro susceptibilities of 8,803 clinical isolates of Candida spp. to 5FCa

Overall, 5FC was very active in vitro (MIC90, 1 µg/ml; 95% S, 2% I, and 3% R) against the 8,803 isolates. 5FC was most active against C. glabrata (MIC90, 0.12 µg/ml; 99% S), C. parapsilosis (MIC90, 0.25 µg/ml; 99% S), C. dubliniensis (MIC90, 0.12 µg/ml; 100% S), C. guilliermondii (MIC90, 0.5 µg/ml; 100% S), and C. kefyr (MIC90, 1 µg/ml; 100% S). C. albicans (MIC90, 1 µg/ml; 97% S) and C. tropicalis (MIC90, 1 µg/ml; 92% S) were slightly less susceptible to 5FC at the NCCLS breakpoint of 4 µg/ml. Notably, only 3% of 5,208 isolates of C. albicans and 1% of 1,267 isolates of C. glabrata exhibited primary resistance to 5FC (Table 1). In contrast, C. krusei was the least susceptible species (MIC90, 32 µg/ml; 5% S, 67% I, and 28% R). The 5FC MIC distributions stratified by year and by geographic location were virtually identical to the aggregate data presented in Table 1. There were no differences in the MIC distribution observed over time or among the different geographic regions (North America, Latin America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific) represented (data not shown).

Much of the data concerning primary resistance to 5FC among Candida spp. has been derived from studies conducted in the 1970s and 1980s (3, 5, 8, 31, 34) prior to the standardization of in vitro testing methods. Primary resistance among C. albicans has been reported to range from 6.5% in Europe to 33% in the United States, with an overall prevalence of 7 to 9% (3, 31). C. albicans serotype B, found mainly in Africans and among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with thrush (18, 37), is reported to be significantly more resistant (49%) than serotype A strains (11%) (5). These data were derived by nonstandardized testing methods that have been shown to vary by as much as 10,000-fold when used to determine 5FC MICs for Candida spp. in different laboratories (14). Furthermore, the isolates tested were often a mix of strains representing both superficial mucosal and invasive isolates.

The data generated by NCCLS-based methods for determining the MICs for Candida spp. are markedly different than those cited above. Studies from Canada (17, 33), the United States (20), Italy (6), and Spain (9) in recent years estimated resistance to 5FC to be 0 to 0.6% for C. albicans and 0.6 to 6% for all Candida species combined. The Canadian and U.S. data were derived with strains isolated from blood cultures, whereas the Spanish and Italian data represented oral isolates from HIV-infected patients, as well as invasive isolates.

Our data markedly expand the database of 5FC MICs determined by NCCLS methods for clinically important invasive (blood and normally sterile sites) isolates of Candida spp. Moreover, this collection spans the past decade and includes isolates from medical centers throughout the world.

Like the findings of the studies by Hoban et al. (17), Kao et al. (20), Barchiesi et al. (6), and Cuenca-Estrella et al. (9), these data document a very low level of primary resistance among virtually all Candida spp. with the exception of C. krusei. Furthermore, the MIC90 for the four most common species—C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis—ranges from 0.12 µg/ml (C. glabrata) to 1 µg/ml (C. albicans and C. tropicalis). Thus, the most common species causing hematogenous candidiasis (25) are exquisitely susceptible to 5FC.

Animal infection models have documented the efficacy of 5FC alone and in combination with other systemically active antifungal agents against various Candida spp. (4, 16, 27), and several studies have demonstrated concordance between in vitro susceptibility and in vivo endpoints (1, 30, 35). Recent in vitro pharmacodynamic studies have determined that 5FC exhibits concentration-independent fungistatic activity against Candida spp. that is optimized at concentrations of 4x MIC (21). These findings have been confirmed in vivo by Andes and van Ogtrop (2), who showed that time above the MIC was the pharmacodynamic parameter that most strongly correlated with outcome in 5FC treatment of murine candidiasis and that maximum efficacy was observed when 5FC blood levels exceeded the MIC for only 20 to 25% of the dosing interval. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have documented a significant post-antifungal effect for 5FC and Candida spp. occurring at from 2.5 to 4 h (2, 21). This post-antifungal effect probably accounts for the relatively brief time that levels must exceed the MIC to demonstrate efficacy in the murine model (2).

The excellent spectrum and potency of 5FC versus Candida spp., along with the favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters noted above, suggest that 5FC might be used with dosing regimens that produce lower concentrations in serum than those currently employed (25 mg/kg q 6 h; 40 to 60 µg/ml). Lower dosing could reduce the risk of toxicity to the host while maintaining the overall efficacy of 5FC when it is coupled with amphotericin B or an azole in the treatment of invasive candidiasis (2, 13, 21, 30).

In summary, the present study provides an extensive database of 5FC MICs for Candida spp. from defined clinically important (blood and normally sterile sites) sites of infection. The MIC distribution for each species, determined by a standardized reference method, presented in a continuous fashion will ensure the broadest utility of the data (19, 23). The favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of 5FC, coupled with its spectrum and potency, could lead to improved dosing practices and a "rebirth" of this agent as a useful adjunct in the treatment of serious Candida infection.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Linda Elliott for excellent secretarial assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

This study was supported in part by Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck and Company, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, and Schering-Plough Research Institute.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Medical Microbiology Division, C606 GH, Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242. Phone: (319) 384-9566. Fax: (319) 356-4916. E-mail: michael-pfaller{at}uiowa.edu. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Anaissie, E. J., N. C. Karyotakis, R. Hachem, M. C. Dignani, J. H. Rex, and V. Paetznick. 1994. Correlation between in vitro and in vivo activity of antifungal agents against Candida species. J. Infect. Dis. 170:384-389.[Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Andes, D., and M. van Ogtrop. 2000. In vivo characterization of the pharmacodynamics of flucytosine in a neutropenic murine disseminated candidiasis model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:938-942.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Armstrong, D., and H. J. Schmitt. 1990. Older drugs, p. 439-454. In J. F. Ryley (ed.), Chemotherapy for fungal diseases. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
    4. 4
  4. Atkinson, B. A., C. Bouthet, R. Bocanegra, A. Correa, M. F. Luther, and J. R. Graybill. 1995. Comparison of fluconazole, amphotericin B and flucytosine in treatment of a murine model of disseminated infection with Candida glabrata in immunocompromised mice. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 35:631-640.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    5. 5
  5. Auger, P., C. Dumas, and J. Joly. 1979. A study of 666 strains of Candida albicans: correlation between serotype and susceptibility to 5-fluorocytosine. J. Infect. Dis. 139:590-594.[Medline]
    6. 6
  6. Barchiesi, F., D. Arzeni, F. Caselli, and G. Scalise. 2000. Primary resistance to flucytosine among clinical isolates of Candida spp. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 45:401-412.[Free Full Text]
    7. 7
  7. Barry, A. L., M. A. Pfaller, S. D. Brown, A. Espinel-Ingroff, M. A. Ghannoum, C. Knapp, R. P. Rennie, J. H. Rex, and M. G. Rinaldi. 2000. Quality control limits for broth microdilution susceptibility tests of ten antifungal agents. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3457-3459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    8. 8
  8. Bennett, J. E. 1977. Flucytosine. Ann. Intern. Med. 86:319-321.
    9. 9
  9. Cuenca-Estrella, M., T. M. Diaz-Guerra, E. Mellado, and J. L. Rodriguez-Tudela. 2001. Flucytosine primary resistance in Candida species and Cryptococcus neoformans. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 20:276-279.[CrossRef][Medline]
    10. 10
  10. Dismukes, W. E. 2000. Introduction to antifungal drugs. Clin. Infect. Dis. 30:653-657.[CrossRef][Medline]
    11. 11
  11. Edwards, J. E., Jr., G. P. Bodey, R. A. Bowden, T. Büchner, B. E. de Pauw, S. G. Filler, M. A. Ghannoum, M. Glauser, R. Herbrecht, C. A. Kauffman, S. Kohno, P. Martino, F. Meunier, T. Mori, M. A. Pfaller, J. H. Rex, T. R. Rogers, R. H. Rubin, J. Solomkin, C. Viscoli, T. J. Walsh, and M. White. 1997. International conference for the development of consensus on the management and prevention of severe candidal infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 25:43-59.[Medline]
    12. 12
  12. Ernst, E. J. 2001. Investigational antifungal agents. Pharmacotherapy 21(Part 2):165S-174S.[CrossRef][Medline]
    13. 13
  13. Frances, P., and T. A. Walsh. 1992. Evolving role of flucytosine in immunocompromised patients: new insights into safety, pharmacokinetics, and antifungal therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 15:1003-1018.[Medline]
    14. 14
  14. Galgiani, J. N., J. Reiser, C. Brass, A. Espinel-Ingroff, M. A. Gordon, and T. M. Kerkering. 1987. Comparison of relative susceptibilities of Candida species to three antifungal agents as determined by unstandardized methods. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31:1343-1347.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Georgeopapdakuo, N. H., and T. J. Walsh. 1996. Antifungal agents: chemotherapeutic targets and immunologic strategies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:279-291.[Medline]
    16. 16
  16. Graybill, J. R., L. K. Najvan, J. D. Holmberg, and M. F. Luther. 1995. Fluconazole, D0870, and flucytosine treatment of disseminated Candida tropicalis infections in mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:924-929.[Abstract]
    17. 17
  17. Hoban, D. J., G. G. Zhanel, and J. A. Karlowski. 1999. In vitro susceptibilities of Candida and Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from blood cultures of neutropenic patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1463-1464.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    18. 18
  18. Iwata, K. 1992. Drug resistance in human pathogenic fungi. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 8:407-421.[CrossRef][Medline]
    19. 19
  19. Jones, R. N. 2000. Detection of emerging resistance patterns within longitudinal surveillance systems: data sensitivity and microbial susceptibility. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 46(Topic T2):1-8.[Free Full Text]
    20. 20
  20. Kao, A. S., M. E. Brandt, W. R. Pruitt, L. A. Conn, B. A. Perkins, D. S. Stephens, W. S. Baughman, A. L. Reingold, G. A. Rothrock, M. A. Pfaller, R. W. Pinner, and R. A. Hajjeh. 1999. The epidemiology of candidemia in two United States cities: results of a population-based active surveillance. Clin. Infect. Dis. 29:1164-1170.[CrossRef][Medline]
    21. 21
  21. Lewis, R. E., M. E. Klepser, and M. A. Pfaller. 2000. In vitro pharmacodynamic characteristics of flucytosine determined by time-kill methods. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 36:101-105.[CrossRef][Medline]
    22. 22
  22. Medoff, G., and G. S. Kobayashi. 1980. Strategies in the treatment of systemic fungal infections. New Engl. J. Med. 302:145-155.[Medline]
    23. 23
  23. Morris, A. K., and R. G. Masterton. 2002. Antibiotic resistance surveillance: action for international studies. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 49:7-10.[Free Full Text]
    24. 24
  24. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved standard. NCCLS document M27-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
    25. 25
  25. Pfaller, M. A., R. N. Jones, G. V. Doern, H. S. Sader, S. A. Messer, A. Houston, S. Coffman, R. J. Hollis, and the SENTRY Participants Group. 2000. Bloodstream infections due to Candida species: SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program in North America and Latin America, 1997-1998. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:747-751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    26. 26
  26. Pfaller, M. A., and W. L. Yu. 2001. Antifungal susceptibility testing: new technology and clinical applications. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 15:1227-1261.[CrossRef][Medline]
    27. 27
  27. Polak, A. 1989. Combination therapy for systemic mycosis. Infection 17:203-209.[CrossRef][Medline]
    28. 28
  28. Rex, J. H., M. A. Pfaller, J. N. Galgiani, M. S. Bartlett, A. Espinel-Ingroff, M. A. Ghannoum, M. Lancaster, F. C. Odds, M. G. Rinaldi, T. J. Walsh, A. L. Barry, and Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Development of interpretive breakpoints for antifungal susceptibility testing: conceptual framework and analysis of in vitro: in vivo correlation data for fluconazole, itraconazole, and Candida infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24:235-247.[Medline]
    29. 29
  29. Rex, J. H., T. J. Walsh, J. D. Sobel, S. G. Filler, P. G. Pappas, W. E. Dismukes, and J. E. Edwards. 2000. Practice guidelines for treatment of candidiasis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 30:662-678.[CrossRef][Medline]
    30. 30
  30. Rex, J. H., M. A. Pfaller, T. J. Walsh, V. Chaturvedi, A. Espinel-Ingroff, M. A. Ghannoum, L. L. Gosey, F. C. Odds, M. G. Rinaldi, D. J. Sheehan, and D. W. Warnock. 2001. Antifungal susceptibility testing: practical aspects and current challenges. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14:643-658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    31. 31
  31. Scholer, H. J. 1980. Flucytosine, p. 35-106. In D. C. E. Speller (ed.), Antifungal chemotherapy. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, United Kingdom.
    32. 32
  32. Sheehan, D. J., C. A. Hitchcock, and C. M. Sibley. 1999. Current and emerging azole antifungal agents. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12:40-79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    33. 33
  33. St. Germain, G., M. Laverdiere, R. Pelletier, A. M. Bourgault, M. Libman, C. Lemieux, and G. Noel. 2001. Prevalence and antifungal susceptibility of 442 Candida isolates from blood and other normally sterile sites: results of a 2-year (1996 to 1998) multicenter surveillance study in Quebec, Canada. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:949-953.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    34. 34
  34. Stiller, R. L., J. E. Bennett, H. J. Scholer, M. Wall, A. Polak, and D. A. Stevens. 1982. Susceptibility to 5-fluorocytosine and prevalence of serotype in 402 Candida albicans isolates from the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 22:482-487.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    35. 35
  35. Stiller, R. L., J. E. Bennett, H. J. Scholer, M. Wall, A. Polak, and D. A. Stevens. 1983. Correlation of in vivo susceptibility test results with in vivo response: flucytosine therapy in a systemic candidiasis model. J. Infect. Dis. 147:1070-1077.[Medline]
    36. 36
  36. Tassel, D., and M. A. Madoff. 1968. Treatment of Candida sepsis and Cryptococcus meningitis with 5-fluorocytosine, a new antifungal agent. JAMA 206:830-832.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    37. 37
  37. Torssander, J., E. Chryssanthou, and B. Petrini. 1996. Increased prevalence of oral Candida albicans serotype B in homosexual men: a comparative and longitudinal study in HIV-infected and HIV-negative patients. Mycoses 39:353-356.[Medline]
    38. 38
  38. Uzun, O., and E. J. Anaissie. 1996. Problems and controversies in the management of hematogenous candidiasis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 22:95.S-101S.
    39. 39
  39. Vermes, A., H.-J. Guchelaar, and J. Dankert. 2000. Flucytosine: a review of its pharmacology, clinical indications, pharmacokinetics, toxicity and drug interactions. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 46:171-179.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    40. 40
  40. Warren, N. G., and K. C. Hazen. 1999. Candida, Cryptococcus, and other yeasts of medical importance, p. 1184-1199. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 7th ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2002, p. 3518-3521, Vol. 46, No. 11
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.11.3518-3521.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Gibbs, D. L., Newell, V. A., Nagy, E., Dobiasova, S., Rinaldi, M., Barton, R., Veselov, A., the Global Antifungal Surveillance Group, (2008). Candida krusei, a Multidrug-Resistant Opportunistic Fungal Pathogen: Geographic and Temporal Trends from the ARTEMIS DISK Antifungal Surveillance Program, 2001 to 2005. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 515-521 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Procop, G. W., Rinaldi, M. G. (2007). Multicenter Comparison of the VITEK 2 Antifungal Susceptibility Test with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Reference Method for Testing Amphotericin B, Flucytosine, and Voriconazole against Candida spp.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 3522-3528 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hope, W. W., Warn, P. A., Sharp, A., Reed, P., Keevil, B., Louie, A., Walsh, T. J., Denning, D. W., Drusano, G. L. (2007). Optimization of the Dosage of Flucytosine in Combination with Amphotericin B for Disseminated Candidiasis: a Pharmacodynamic Rationale for Reduced Dosing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 3760-3762 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zepelin, M. B.-v., Kunz, L., Ruchel, R., Reichard, U., Weig, M., Gross, U. (2007). Epidemiology and antifungal susceptibilities of Candida spp. to six antifungal agents: results from a surveillance study on fungaemia in Germany from July 2004 to August 2005. J Antimicrob Chemother 60: 424-428 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mokaddas, E. M., Al-Sweih, N. A., Khan, Z. U. (2007). Species distribution and antifungal susceptibility of Candida bloodstream isolates in Kuwait: a 10-year study. J Med Microbiol 56: 255-259 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J. (2007). Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis: a Persistent Public Health Problem. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20: 133-163 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bergner, R., Hoffmann, M., Riedel, K.-D., Mikus, G., Henrich, D. M., Haefeli, W. E., Uppenkamp, M., Walter-Sack, I. (2006). Fluconazole dosing in continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (CVVHF): need for a high daily dose of 800 mg. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21: 1019-1023 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pfaller, M. A., Boyken, L., Messer, S. A., Tendolkar, S., Hollis, R. J., Diekema, D. J. (2005). Comparison of Results of Voriconazole Disk Diffusion Testing for Candida Species with Results from a Central Reference Laboratory in the ARTEMIS Global Antifungal Surveillance Program. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 5208-5213 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Al Mosaid, A., Sullivan, D. J., Polacheck, I., Shaheen, F. A., Soliman, O., Al Hedaithy, S., Al Thawad, S., Kabadaya, M., Coleman, D. C. (2005). Novel 5-Flucytosine-Resistant Clade of Candida dubliniensis from Saudi Arabia and Egypt Identified by Cd25 Fingerprinting. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 4026-4036 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Majoros, L., Kardos, G., Feiszt, P., Szabo, B. (2005). Efficacy of amphotericin B and flucytosine against fluconazole-resistant Candida inconspicua clinical isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 56: 253-254 [Full Text]  
  • Cuenca-Estrella, M., Rodriguez, D., Almirante, B., Morgan, J., Planes, A. M., Almela, M., Mensa, J., Sanchez, F., Ayats, J., Gimenez, M., Salvado, M., Warnock, D. W., Pahissa, A., Rodriguez-Tudela, J. L., on behalf of the Barcelona Candidemia Project Stud, (2005). In vitro susceptibilities of bloodstream isolates of Candida species to six antifungal agents: results from a population-based active surveillance programme, Barcelona, Spain, 2002-2003. J Antimicrob Chemother 55: 194-199 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hope, W. W., Tabernero, L., Denning, D. W., Anderson, M. J. (2004). Molecular Mechanisms of Primary Resistance to Flucytosine in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 4377-4386 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J. (2004). Rare and Emerging Opportunistic Fungal Pathogens: Concern for Resistance beyond Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 4419-4431 [Full Text]  
  • Ahmad, S., Khan, Z., Mokaddas, E., Khan, Z. U. (2004). Isolation and molecular identification of Candida dubliniensis from non-human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in Kuwait. J Med Microbiol 53: 633-637 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dodgson, A. R., Dodgson, K. J., Pujol, C., Pfaller, M. A., Soll, D. R. (2004). Clade-Specific Flucytosine Resistance Is Due to a Single Nucleotide Change in the FUR1 Gene of Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 2223-2227 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hajjeh, R. A., Sofair, A. N., Harrison, L. H., Lyon, G. M., Arthington-Skaggs, B. A., Mirza, S. A., Phelan, M., Morgan, J., Lee-Yang, W., Ciblak, M. A., Benjamin, L. E., Thomson Sanza, L., Huie, S., Yeo, S. F., Brandt, M. E., Warnock, D. W. (2004). Incidence of Bloodstream Infections Due to Candida Species and In Vitro Susceptibilities of Isolates Collected from 1998 to 2000 in a Population-Based Active Surveillance Program. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 1519-1527 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Favel, A., Michel-Nguyen, A., Datry, A., Challier, S., Leclerc, F., Chastin, C., Fallague, K., Regli, P. (2004). Susceptibility of clinical isolates of Candida lusitaniae to five systemic antifungal agents. J Antimicrob Chemother 53: 526-529 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pujol, C., Pfaller, M. A., Soll, D. R. (2004). Flucytosine Resistance Is Restricted to a Single Genetic Clade of Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 262-266 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pfaller, M. A., Messer, S. A., Boyken, L., Rice, C., Tendolkar, S., Hollis, R. J., Diekema, D. J. (2003). Caspofungin Activity against Clinical Isolates of Fluconazole-Resistant Candida. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 5729-5731 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Rex, J. H., Pappas, P. G., Hamill, R. J., Larsen, R. A., Horowitz, H. W., Powderly, W. G., Hyslop, N., Kauffman, C. A., Cleary, J., Mangino, J. E., Lee, J. (2003). Antifungal Susceptibility Survey of 2,000 Bloodstream Candida Isolates in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3149-3154 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tortorano, A. M., Rigoni, A. L., Biraghi, E., Prigitano, A., Viviani, M. A., the FIMUA-ECMM candidaemia study group, (2003). The European Confederation of Medical Mycology ECMM) survey of candidaemia in Italy: antifungal susceptibility patterns of 261 non-albicans Candida isolates from blood. J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 679-682 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pfaller, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Diekema, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pfaller, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Diekema, D. J.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»