Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2002, p. 3549-3554, Vol. 46, No. 11
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.11.3549-3554.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Departments of Antimicrobial Research,1 Leads Discovery,2 Chemistry, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Wilmington, Delaware 19880,3 J-Star Research, Inc., South Plainfield, New Jersey 070804
Received 14 February 2002/ Returned for modification 22 May 2002/ Accepted 19 August 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Signal peptidase I (SPase) is an essential enzyme for many microorganisms. Escherichia coli has only one gene (lepB) that codes for a catalytically active SPase (11). Repression of lepB expression by an arabinose (Ara) promoter (10) or by partial deletion of the natural promoter (11) results in cessation of cell growth and division. The Staphylococcus aureus spsB gene encodes an active SPase (8). Experiments in which the spsB gene was cloned into a plasmid that is temperature sensitive for replication indicated that spsB is also essential for growth. An open reading frame immediately upstream of the spsB gene encodes a homologous sequence and was predicted to be devoid of catalytic activity (8).
Many membrane and secretory proteins in both eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells are synthesized as precursors with an N-terminal signal peptide containing 15 to 30 amino acids. SPases catalyze the processing of N-terminal signal peptides, thereby allowing the release of exported proteins from membranes (9, 12). The bacterial SPases consist of single polypeptides anchored to the membrane by one or two transmembrane domains. The best-characterized SPase is from E. coli, which spans the membrane twice (1, 9). SPases are irreversibly inhibited by certain penem compounds, which act by acylation of the active site serine (6, 17). The crystal structure of a catalytically active soluble fragment of the E. coli enzyme has been described in complex with a ß-lactam (5S, 6S penem) (17). The SPase structure is consistent with the use of Lys 145 as a general base in the activation of the nucleophilic active site Ser 90 (5).
SPase biochemical assays are available (7, 14, 26), but no compounds that effectively inhibit SPase both in vitro and in vivo have been described to date. An efficient synthetic substrate for SPase was recently reported, which presents a kcat/Km ratio of 2.5 x 106 M-1 s-1 (20). However, SPase inhibition in vitro by a given compound does not necessarily correlate with antimicrobial activity. The relevance of biochemical screens is further complicated by the indication that the SPase active site may be partially submerged in the lipid bilayer (23), making its active site somewhat inaccessible to compounds screened in vitro. Here we describe SPase inhibitors obtained with a biochemical assay and the development of a cell-based assay that allowed for investigation of specific cellular inhibition of the target.
|
|
|---|
Cloning of the E. coli lepB gene. The lepB gene from E. coli ATCC 47076 (12, 15) was PCR amplified and inserted into the BamHI and NdeI sites of plasmid pET26(+) (Novagen) as previously described (20) to generate pMB1. pMB2 was engineered by inserting E. coli lepB into the NcoI site of pBAD-His (Invitrogen) after amplification with the following primers: forward, 5'CATGCCATGGATGGCGAATATGTTTGCCCTGA 3'; reverse, 5'CATGCCATGGAGATGGTATTAATGGATGCCG 3'. Chromosomal DNA and plasmid isolation, DNA desalting, and purification from agarose gels were performed with Qiagen kits. DNA transformation into E. coli was performed either according to instructions from the manufacturer or by following standard techniques (18).
Western blot analysis. Wild-type E. coli SPase was purified as previously described (20). Polyclonal antibodies against SPase were produced in a rabbit by Research Genetics, Inc. (Huntsville, Ala.). After centrifugation, the 10-week bleed was subjected to ammonium sulfate precipitation followed by affinity purification with protein G (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind.). For Western blot analysis, the proteins in the cell extracts were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate electrophoresis in gradient gels (4 to 20% acrylamide; Invitrogen) according to instructions from the manufacturer. The samples from E. coli TOP10 cells over-expressing lepB were prepared by freezing and thawing followed by boiling with sodium dodecyl sulfate-containing buffer (18). For expression analysis of the E. coli lepB regulatable strain, DNase (Gibco BRL) was added to the cells, which were then lysed with a French press at 12,000 lb/in2 and processed as described above (18). After transfer to nitrocellulose membranes, the Western blot was processed using anti-rabbit alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antibodies (18).
Construction of a lepB regulatable strain.
The E. coli strain we used (strain 391) is a derivative from DY329 that had the araCBAD operon knocked out and was therefore unable to metabolize ara. The bacteriophage
recombination system was used to promote homologous recombination (16, 24). The antibiotic markers were removed by utilizing the bacteriophage P1 site-specific recombination system cre-loxP (21). The primers used to amplify a kanamycin (KAN) resistance gene from a linear loxP-KAN cassette contained the loxP sites (underlined) and lepB flanking sequences (in italic) as follows: forward primer, 5' GGAAGCGTTCCTCGCCATTCTGCACGTCGGCAAAGACAACAAATAACCCTTAGGAGTTGGTATCACGAGGCCCTTTCGTCTT 3'; reverse primer, 5' TAGCCACGGGAGATTTATCTCATAAATAATTCACGTTGTCGCCATAACGGCGACAACGTGTTTTCACCGTCATCACCGAAAC 3'. Electroporation-competent (24) E. coli 391 cells containing pBAD with E. coli lepB were transformed with the linear loxP-KAN cassette, and recombinants were selected on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar containing 0.2% Ara, 30 µg of KAN per ml, and 50 µg of ampicillin (AMP) per ml. The resulting colonies were tested for growth on plates containing antibiotics, with and without Ara. The colonies growing exclusively on Ara-containing agar were tested by PCR, with distal primers designed according to the lepB flanking genes rnc and lepA (forward primer, 5' TAATCCGGCAGAAAAGGCGCT 3'; reverse primer, 5' TACTGCTGGCACTACGATGA 3'). The KAN resistance gene used to replace the chromosomal copy of lepB in a strain expressing E. coli lepB from pBAD was removed by transforming the cells with pJDP8 followed by selection on LB agar containing Ara, spectinomycin, and AMP. Loss of the KAN resistance mark was ascertained by streaking the cells on LB medium containing Ara, KAN, and AMP. Spectinomycin-resistant, AMP-resistant, and KAN-sensitive cultures were then transferred to LB medium containing Ara and AMP and incubated at 37°C to obtain isolated colonies, which were again tested for loss of the KAN resistance marker.
Growth studies. Growth of E. coli (E. coli parent strain containing or not containing pBAD-HisA and a lepB regulatable strain) was investigated in 50-ml Falcon tubes containing 3 ml of LB medium or RM minimal medium (18). Incubation was done at 32°C and 250 rpm. Growth was monitored by measuring the optical density at 600 nm, after 10 and 20 h of incubation. The effect of SPase inhibitors on E. coli TOP10 or the lepB regulatable strain containing the E. coli lepB gene cloned into pBAD was tested in the presence of various concentrations of polymyxin B nonapeptide (Pbn) (22). Further tests with compounds that inhibit growth of the lepB regulatable strain (cell-based assay) utilized 96-well plates, with 150 µl of medium added per well. Plates were incubated with agitation at 32°C and optical density was determined at intervals. Inocula were prepared by transferring the cells from frozen stocks to LB agar containing AMP and Ara. Various concentrations of Ara were tested for inoculum preparation.
Drug susceptibility testing. MICs were determined for a panel of microorganisms (4). In brief, bacterial cultures were inoculated in 96-well plates containing liquid medium with various concentrations of the test compounds. Growth was monitored by measuring the optical density of the culture after incubation at 37°C for 24 h.
Synthesis of penem and MD4 and stability tests for SPase inhibitors. Penem 64 was synthesized as previously described (2, 3, 6). MD4 is a reactive analog of MD3, synthesized to test the effect of a possible breakdown product of MD3. MD4 was synthesized by the addition of freshly prepared vinylmagnesium bromide to 2,5-dichlorobenzaldehyde in tetrahydrofuran (THF) and oxidation of the resulting alcohol with MnO2 in CH2Cl2. Stability tests were performed with the SPase inhibitors MD1, MD2, and MD3 dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), methanol, or Tris buffer. The compounds were incubated at room temperature, and degradation was assessed after various incubation times.
SPase biochemical assay and IC50 determinations.
SPase and K5L10YFSASALA
KIK(fluorescein)NH2 peptide (1:10 ratio) were incubated using previously described assay conditions (20), except that the hydrolysis of peptide was monitored by reading the fluorescence polarization value of fluorescein on an Acquest machine (LJL Biosystem, Sunnyvale, Calif.) at an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and an emission wavelength of 530 nM. An in-house compound library was tested at 14.5 µM. For 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) determinations, compound concentrations ranging from 100 µM to 1 nM were used in the assay.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Growth of E. coli TOP10 bearing pMB2 was investigated in LB medium (LB) and LB medium supplemented with 20 µg of Pbn per ml (LB-Pbn), 100 µM penem (LB-P), or both Pbn and penem (LB-Pbn-P). Growth was measured as the increase in optical density at 600 nm after 20 h of incubation. The initial optical density of the inoculum was 0.1. Experiments were performed in duplicate.
|
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Construction of a lepB regulatable E. coli strain. (A) Schematic representation of the strategy utilized to replace the lepB gene by a loxP-Kan-loxP resistance cassette. The positions of the flanking primers used to confirm the gene replacement are indicated. The figure is not drawn to scale. (B) PCR amplification of E. coli chromosomal DNA with Primer For and Primer Rev. Lanes: 1, molecular size markers; 2, parent strain E. coli 391; 3, KAN-resistant E. coli lepB regulatable strain; 4, KAN-sensitive E. coli lepB regulatable strain.
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effect of L-Ara concentration on growth and SPase production by a KAN-sensitive E. coli lepB regulatable strain that contains pMB2. (A) Growth in the presence of various Ara concentrations (% [wt/vol]). Open squares, 0; closed triangles, 0.0001; inverted triangles, 0.0002; open circles, 0.0004; closed squares, 0.05; closed circles, 0.1. Experiments were performed in duplicate and repeated independently. (B) Western blot analysis of lepB expression after 10 h (lanes 1, 3, and 5) and 22 h (lanes 2, 4, and 6) of incubation. Three micrograms of total cell protein was loaded in each lane. Lanes: SP, purified SPase; 1 and 2, lepB regulatable strain with 0.0002% Ara; 3 and 4, lepB regulatable strain with 0.05% Ara; 5 and 6, parent strain.
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Growth rescue of an E. coli lepB regulatable strain by increased expression of lepB in the presence of penem and different Ara concentrations. (A) Growth on LB medium. (B) Growth on LB medium supplemented with 10 µg of Pbn per ml. Closed squares, 0.0004% Ara; closed triangles, 0.05% Ara; open circles, 0.0004% Ara and 10 µM penem; closed circles, 0.05% Ara and 10 µM penem. Experiments were performed in duplicate and repeated independently.
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Chemical structures of SPase inhibitors. MD1, MD2, and MD3 were selected from a high-throughput screen that utilized a biochemical assay.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Susceptibility of a panel of microorganisms to SPase inhibitors
|
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Synthesis of MD4. a, vinylmagnesium bromide, THF, 0°C; b, MnO2, CH2Cl2.
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Growth impairment of an E. coli lepB regulatable strain as an indication of SPase inhibition by 30 µM MD1, MD2, MD3, or MD4. The growth medium was LB containing 10 µg of Pbn per ml. Penem (30 µM) was included as a control for the experiments. The compounds were dissolved in 100% DMSO. The final DMSO concentration in the medium was 1%. Closed symbols, 0.0004% Ara; open symbols, 0.05% Ara. (A) Growth in the presence of MD3 and MD4. Squares, penem; inverted triangles, MD3; circles, MD4. (B) Growth in the presence of MD1 and MD2. Squares, DMSO; inverted triangles, MD1; circles, MD2. Experiments were done in triplicate and repeated twice.
|
|
|
|---|
An E. coli recombinant strain was constructed, with lepB expression from pBAD dependent on the Ara concentration. Previous analyses of gene expression from plasmids containing the araBAD promoter have indicated that at subsaturating concentrations of Ara, intermediate levels of expression represent a population average of cells that are individually different (19). However, those authors used a very high Ara concentration (0.1%) to induce green fluorescent protein synthesis prior to examining the cells by fluorescence microscopy. We have observed that when the Ara concentration in the medium is lowered to the minimum sufficient to support growth similar to that of the parent strain, the cells become sensitized to inhibitors of SPase. An SPase inhibitor, penem (6), was utilized to validate the system. E. coli was sensitized to this compound in the presence of Pbn. Polymyxin derivatives that lack the fatty acid tail are generally not bactericidal but are capable of permeabilizing the outer membrane (22). In this respect, the best-characterized derivative is Pbn. Its MICs for E. coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium are higher than 300 µg/ml, but even as low a concentration as 0.3 µg/ml is sufficient to permeabilize the outer membrane (22). In the present work Pbn itself had a negligible negative effect on cell growth at the concentrations utilized. The growth results obtained at different Ara concentrations and in the presence or absence of penem might be indicative that specific inhibition of the target activity in vivo was taking place. However, the use of other systems and/or promoters (19, 25) may provide more tightly regulated expression at the level of individual cells and increase the accuracy of the cell-based assays.
Three SPase inhibitors selected with a biochemical assay were active against bacterial strains, although they did not inhibit growth of wild-type E. coli at the concentrations tested. Those compounds affected growth of the E. coli strain under-expressing lepB only in the presence of Pbn, perhaps due to the E. coli permeability barrier. Cell-based assays employing gram-positive organisms might be more sensitive to lower concentrations of the compounds. MD3 was very unstable, and it is possible that a reactive degradation product was solely responsible for the inhibition of the SPase biochemical reaction as well as cell growth. MD4 is a reactive analog of MD3. MD3 and MD4 yielded similar inhibition profiles when tested with the cell-based assay and also had similar IC50 values for SPase inhibition with a biochemical assay. When either MD3 or MD4 was present in the medium, growth rescue by high concentrations of Ara was observed only after prolonged incubation. This is in contrast to the inhibition observed with penem, a time-dependent irreversible inhibitor of SPase (17). MD1 and MD2 only partially inhibited growth of the strain under-expressing lepB. The percentage of growth inhibition observed correlated with the IC50 values obtained with the biochemical assay, although the mechanism of action of these compounds in vivo is not clearly defined. Similar to the data obtained with penem, these results also indicate that a cell-based assay utilizing strains under-expressing a given gene may be used for initial investigations of target inhibition in whole cells.
|
|
|---|
recombination functions to promote gene replacement in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 180:2063-2071.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»