Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2002, p. 3843-3845, Vol. 46, No. 12
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.12.3843-3845.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Diverse Bacillus anthracis Isolates
Pamala R. Coker,1* Kimothy L. Smith,2 and Martin E. Hugh-Jones1
Department of Pathobiological Sciences, Louisiana State University School of Veterinary Medicine, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803,1
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 945512
Received 21 March 2002/
Returned for modification 29 July 2002/
Accepted 5 September 2002

ABSTRACT
A test of 25 genetically diverse isolates of
Bacillus anthracis was conducted to determine their susceptibility to seven clinically
relevant antimicrobial agents. Etest strips (AB BIODISK, Solna,
Sweden) were used to measure the MICs for the isolates. Using
the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards MIC
breakpoints for staphylococci, three isolates were found to
be resistant to penicillin and five were found to be resistant
to cefuroxime. The penicillin-resistant isolates were negative
for ß-lactamase production. Continued surveillance
of
B. anthracis field isolates is recommended to monitor antimicrobial
susceptibility.

INTRODUCTION
The etiologic agent of anthrax,
Bacillus anthracis, causes an
acute disease, primarily of herbivores, that is transmissible
to humans. Susceptible animals are primarily infected by the
spores formed during the vegetative state of the bacteria. Spores
may be found in soil contaminated by diseased animals or in
diseased animal products, such as hair, wool, hides, and bones.
The importance of treatment of the disease in humans has been
underscored by the bioterrorism events of October 2001 in the
United States. Ciprofloxacin was the antimicrobial agent of
choice for prophylactic treatment after exposure to the spores
of
B. anthracis that were used in the bioterrorism events. Penicillin,
traditionally the drug of choice for treatment, is still recommended
in other parts of the world despite reports of penicillin resistance
(
2,
3). The Centers for Disease Control recommended ciprofloxacin,
penicillin, and doxycycline for the treatment of human anthrax
and for use as a prophylactic measure prior to and during the
October event (
1). In the past, streptomycin, penicillin, gentamicin,
and chloramphenicol have also been recommended (
7).
Other articles concerning B. anthracis and antimicrobial susceptibility have been written: two over 10 years ago and one within the past year. The first paper, published in 1990 by Lightfoot et al., determined the antimicrobial susceptibility of 70 isolates of B anthracis to penicillin, amoxicillin, cefuroxime, gentamicin, streptomycin, erythromycin, tretracycline, chloramphenicol, and ciprofloxacin by agar dilution (6). Penicillin resistance and ß-lactamase production were noted in two isolates. This paper was quickly followed in 1991 by a paper by Doganay and Aydin (2). They tested 22 B. anthracis isolates against 27 antimicrobial agents by agar dilution and reported that 19 isolates showed resistance to the five broad-spectrum cephalosporins tested. The isolates were shown to be sensitive to the other antimicrobials tested. These two papers were very basic in their approach and reporting. The latest paper, by Mohammed et al., tested 65 isolates with nine antimicrobial agents by using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) broth microdilution method (7). The results obtained from 50 of the isolates were compared to those obtained with Etest strips. One isolate was penicillin resistant, and no statistically significant difference was found between the broth microdilution and Etest results.
The two earlier papers distinguished between sensitive and resistant with regard to the MIC noted for each isolate (2, 6). Unfortunately, no basis was given for the standard they used for these designations. The paper by Mohammed et al. used the NCCLS breakpoints for Staphylococcus, which we have also chosen to use to discriminate between sensitive (S), intermediate (I), and resistant (R) isolates. According to the NCCLS literature, studies of Bacillus spp. are not yet adequate to develop reproducible, definitive standards to interpret results (8). The infections caused by Staphylococcus spp. are very similar to the infections caused by B. anthracis. In addition, the distributions of the aforementioned antimicrobial data are in line with the Staphylococcus MIC breakpoints for the antimicrobials used in this study.
In this study, we examined 25 genetically diverse isolates of B. anthracis to determine their susceptibilities to seven clinically relevant antimicrobial agents. Etest strips (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) were used to determine the MICs for the isolates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 25 isolates diverse in time, space, and genotype
were used in this study (Table
1). These 25 isolates are a representative
subset of 89 distinct genotypes characterized by multiple-locus
variable-number tandem repeat analysis (
5).
MICs of the seven antimicrobial agents penicillin, cephalexin,
cefaclor, tobramycin, doxycycline, ciprofloxacin, and cefuroxime
were determined by using the Etest methodology described elsewhere
(
4). Tryptic soy agar (TSA) plates containing 5% sheep blood
(Remel) were inoculated with a swab taken from a colony suspension
equal to that of a 0.5 McFarland standard. One Etest strip was
placed in each plate after 10 min. Quality control was assessed
with
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213. The plates were incubated
overnight at 37°C, and the plates were read at 16 and 24
h. This procedure was repeated three times for each isolate.
The ß-lactamase activity of each isolate was determined with nitrocefin disks (BBL), which utilize a chromogenic cephalosporin. A drop of sterilized water was applied to the disk, and then a loop was used to remove a colony from the agar plate and it was applied to the disk. The inoculum was taken from an overnight TSA plate for each isolate. A positive reaction was denoted by the formation of a pink or red color. The reactions were held for 1 h to confirm negative results.

RESULTS
The MIC results are summarized in Table
2. Using the
Staphylococcus MIC breakpoints, all isolates were susceptible to the antimicrobials,
except for cefuroxime and penicillin.
Only one isolate, GT 69, was sensitive. Five isolates (GT 23,
28, 34, 55, and 77) were resistant, and the remaining 19 isolates
were categorized as intermediate to cefuroxime. The MIC at which
90% of the isolates tested are inhibited (MIC
90) was 32 µg/ml,
which is considered the breakpoint for resistance. The MIC range
for cefuroxime was wide: from 6 to 48 µg/ml.
Of the three recommended antimicrobials for the treatment of anthrax, ciprofloxacin and doxycycline exhibited potent activities against the B. anthracis isolates. Twenty-two of the isolates were susceptible to penicillin, and 3 (GT 20, 68, and 85) were classified as resistant. None of the isolates examined showed any ß-lactamase activity. Ciprofloxacin, the drug of choice, had a MIC range of 0.032 to 0.38 µg/ml, with a MIC90 of 0.094 µg/ml. This was the same as the MIC50 and was the most active agent tested. All of the isolates were susceptible to doxycycline and the other antimicrobials: cephalexin, cefaclor, and tobramycin.

DISCUSSION
In this study, we have examined a spatially, temporally, and
genetically diverse group of
B. anthracis isolates for susceptibility
to seven clinically relevant antimicrobials. This is the first
report to use confirmed genetically diverse field isolates (
5).
Lightfoot et al. used 70 isolates, 33 of which were considered
by the authors to be unrelated (
6). Doganay and Aydin used 22
isolates collected from the same region in Turkey within a period
of 7 years (
2). The most recent paper, by Mohammed et al., used
50 historical and 15 recent isolates (
7). The 50 historical
isolates, collected between 1937 and 1997, were selected as
representatives of temporally and spatially diverse strains.
Together, these studies have utilized 182 isolates to test antimicrobial
susceptibilities. Unfortunately, the detailed isolate information
from previous studies could not be obtained, and, therefore,
no correlations or comparisons can be made genetically, spatially,
or temporally.
Cefuroxime is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin and is reported to be effective against gram-positive bacteria. The older studies showed a high rate of resistance with cefuroxime, although the MIC90s were lower in this study. The MIC90 in the other studies was 64 µg/ml, and for this study, it was 32 µg/ml. This could be an artifact of the methodologies or could reflect a true difference in the isolates; however, in any case, the reason for this resistance is unknown, and the mechanism of resistance needs to be investigated further.
Penicillin and ciprofloxacin were also examined in all studies, and both agents showed good activity against the isolates of B. anthracis. Differences in the MIC90s between the reports have been noted.
Penicillin resistance was reported in two of the other studies. Lightfoot et al. reported resistance (MIC > 0.25 µg/ml) in two isolates that originated from the same fatal case of infection, and Mohammed et al. reported three resistant isolates, including the same isolate used in the study by Lightfoot et al. (6, 7). Using the Staphylococcus breakpoints, our study demonstrated three resistant isolates. These isolates were tested for ß-lactamase production and found to be nonproducers, as were all of the isolates. Since the highest concentration was within a doubling dilution of 0.25 µg/ml, it is possible that the Staphylococcus breakpoints are not appropriate for comparison in Bacillus species. Other explanations for this observation could be possible. Strains of B. licheniformis have been shown to produce large amounts of a ß-lactamase and yet be sensitive to penicillin (9). In another study, a strain was shown to be highly susceptible to penicillin and still actively produce a ß-lactamase (10). Penicillin resistance in Bacillus spp. is an area that needs more research than a cursory susceptibility panel every few years.
Ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, and the remaining antimicrobial agents, cefaclor, cephalexin, and tobramycin, showed that all isolates tested were highly susceptible. This was in agreement with the findings of other studies that tested the corresponding antimicrobial agent.
Now that a reliable genotyping system is available, more genotypes should be tested against these and other antimicrobials to verify the trends noted here and in other studies. ß-Lactamase production or nonproduction should not be considered an alternative to testing penicillin resistance. Hopefully, this study will contribute to the impetus for a more thorough study of ß-lactamase production and Bacillus spp. Continued surveillance of B. anthracis field isolates is recommended to monitor antimicrobial susceptibility.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We express our gratitude to Eli Lilly for making this project
possible.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Pathobiological Sciences, Louisiana State University School of Veterinary Medicine, Baton Rouge, LA 70803. Phone: (225) 578-9659. Fax: (225) 578-7117. E-mail:
Banthracis{at}vetmed.lsu.edu.


REFERENCES
1 - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2001. Update: investigation of bioterrorism-related anthrax and interim guidelines for exposure management and antimicrobial therapy, October 2001. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 50:909-919.[Medline]
2 - Doganay, M., and N. Aydin. 1991. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus anthracis. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 23:333-335.[Medline]
3 - Gold, H. 1967. Treatment of anthrax. Fed. Proc. 26:1563-1568.[Medline]
4 - Isenberg, H. D. (ed.) 1994. Clinical microbiology procedures handbook. Supplement 1. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
5 - Keim, P., L. B. Price, A. M. Klevytska, K. L. Smith, J. M. Schupp, R. Okinaka, P. J. Jackson, and M. E. Hugh-Jones. 2000. Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis reveals genetic relationships within Bacillus anthracis. J. Bacteriol. 182:2928-2936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Lightfoot, N. F., R. J. D Scott, and P. C. B. Turnbull. 1990. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus anthracis. Salisbury Med. Bull. 68(Suppl. 1):95-98.
7 - Mohammed, M. J., C. K. Marston, T. Popovic, R. S. Weyant, and F. C. Tenover. 2002. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Bacillus anthracis: comparison of results obtained by using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth microdilution reference and Etest agar gradient diffusion methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1902-1907.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing. Twelfth informational supplement. M100-S12. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
9 - Pollock, M. R. 1965. Purification and properties of penicillinases from two strains of Bacillus licheniformis: a chemical, physicochemical and physiological comparison. Biochem. J. 94:666-675.[Medline]
10 - Ratney, R. S. 1965. The chemistry of the cell walls of Bacillus anthracis: the effect of penicillin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 101:15.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2002, p. 3843-3845, Vol. 46, No. 12
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.12.3843-3845.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Barrow, E. W., Dreier, J., Reinelt, S., Bourne, P. C., Barrow, W. W.
(2007). In Vitro Efficacy of New Antifolates against Trimethoprim-Resistant Bacillus anthracis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
51: 4447-4452
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Luna, V. A., King, D. S., Gulledge, J., Cannons, A. C., Amuso, P. T., Cattani, J.
(2007). Susceptibility of Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus mycoides, Bacillus pseudomycoides and Bacillus thuringiensis to 24 antimicrobials using Sensititre(R) automated microbroth dilution and Etest(R) agar gradient diffusion methods. J Antimicrob Chemother
60: 555-567
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Joska, T. M., Anderson, A. C.
(2006). Structure-Activity Relationships of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus anthracis Dihydrofolate Reductase: toward the Identification of New Potent Drug Leads.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 3435-3443
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Citron, D. M., Appleman, M. D.
(2006). In Vitro Activities of Daptomycin, Ciprofloxacin, and Other Antimicrobial Agents against the Cells and Spores of Clinical Isolates of Bacillus Species.. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 3814-3818
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Holty, J.-E. C., Bravata, D. M., Liu, H., Olshen, R. A., McDonald, K. M., Owens, D. K.
(2006). Systematic review: a century of inhalational anthrax cases from 1900 to 2005.. ANN INTERN MED
144: 270-280
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Perreten, V., Vorlet-Fawer, L., Slickers, P., Ehricht, R., Kuhnert, P., Frey, J.
(2005). Microarray-Based Detection of 90 Antibiotic Resistance Genes of Gram-Positive Bacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 2291-2302
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Barrow, E. W., Bourne, P. C., Barrow, W. W.
(2004). Functional Cloning of Bacillus anthracis Dihydrofolate Reductase and Confirmation of Natural Resistance to Trimethoprim. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 4643-4649
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, Y., Tenover, F. C., Koehler, T. M.
(2004). {beta}-Lactamase Gene Expression in a Penicillin-Resistant Bacillus anthracis Strain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 4873-4877
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Turnbull, P. C. B., Sirianni, N. M., LeBron, C. I., Samaan, M. N., Sutton, F. N., Reyes, A. E., Peruski, L. F. Jr.
(2004). MICs of Selected Antibiotics for Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus thuringiensis, and Bacillus mycoides from a Range of Clinical and Environmental Sources as Determined by the Etest. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 3626-3634
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Athamna, A., Massalha, M., Athamna, M., Nura, A., Medlej, B., Ofek, I., Bast, D., Rubinstein, E.
(2004). In vitro susceptibility of Bacillus anthracis to various antibacterial agents and their time-kill activity. J Antimicrob Chemother
53: 247-251
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Price, L. B., Vogler, A., Pearson, T., Busch, J. D., Schupp, J. M., Keim, P.
(2003). In Vitro Selection and Characterization of Bacillus anthracis Mutants with High-Level Resistance to Ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 2362-2365
[Abstract]
[Full Text]