Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2002, p. 3917-3925, Vol. 46, No. 12
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.12.3917-3925.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology,1 Department of Chemistry, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322,3 Department of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 303332
Received 21 December 2001/ Returned for modification 19 March 2002/ Accepted 10 September 2002
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several previous reports have indicated that certain porphyrins show antiviral activity against HIV infection in assays that measured inhibition of virus replication. Protoporphyrin (3), hemin (22, 25), and other related natural porphyrins and metalloporphyrins (11-13, 16, 25-29) have been shown to have activity against HIV in the micromolar range in such antiviral assays. Sulfonated derivatives of tetraphenylporphyrin have also been shown to be active (16, 28, 38) as have other selected tetra-arylporphyrins (11, 15, 16, 26-28). The mechanisms of action and the stage in the viral life cycle at which the porphyrins exert their inhibitory effects on HIV-1 are not well understood. The effect may be due, at least in part, to inhibition of the reverse transcriptase (RT); various metalloporphyrins in the natural porphyrin class showed significant inhibition of RT activity (41). More-recent work by Argyris and coworkers has identified the connection subdomain of the RT as the site of activity of heme (1, 2). A second mode of action of porphyrins may be inhibition of the HIV protease. Natural porphyrins bearing carborane esters at the 2 and 4 positions have been shown to inhibit the proteases of both HIV-1 and HIV-2 (13). A third mechanism by which porphyrins may inhibit HIV is via interaction with the envelope (Env) protein. Binding to a sequence in the V3 loop of the HIV-1 Env protein has been reported as a possible mechanism by which such compounds could inactivate viral infectivity (12, 25-27, 38). The V3 loop is a principal antigenic determinant of the external domain of the viral Env protein and is thought to play an important role in viral attachment and penetration (6, 36, 44, 47, 50). In the V3 loop at least three positively charged and several hydrophobic amino acids are highly conserved at fixed positions. Debnath et al. (11) hypothesized that porphyrins containing anionic groups may interact with some of the conserved positively charged sites of the V3 loop, which may induce conformational changes in gp120 leading to the inhibition of virus entry into susceptible cells. There is also evidence that the V3 loop is involved in the interaction of HIV with the alternative receptor Gal-Cer, which appears to be involved in infection of epithelial cells (8, 18, 49).
While assays of antiviral activity are relevant for identification of potential therapeutic agents, an assay for identification of potential topical microbicides that could be used for prevention of infection should measure inhibition of infection by cell-free virus. In the present study, we have used such an assay to evaluate a number of natural and synthetic porphyrins and determined some of the structural features that are important for their activity. We also provide new information on the effects of the most active compounds on functional activity of the viral Env protein.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell lines. The mouse NIH 3T3 and human HEp-2 cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Va.). The recombinant cell lines human MAGI, monkey sMAGI, and mouse 3T3.T4, 3T3.T4.CCR5, and 3T3.T4.CXCR4 and human T-cell lines CEMx174 and HUT78 were obtained through the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Division of AIDS (National Institutes of Health [NIH], Bethesda, Md.). The human 293T cell line was kindly provided by S. L. Lydy (Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.). NIH 3T3, HEp-2, 3T3.T4, 3T3.T4.CCR5, 3T3.T4.CXCR4, MAGI, sMAGI, and 293T cells were maintained in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. HUT78 and CEMx174 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum.
Viruses and plasmids. For construction of recombinant vaccinia viruses, plasmids pRB21 and vRB12 were kindly provided by Bernard Moss (NIH) and David Steinhauer (National Institute for Medical Research, London, United Kingdom). The 3'SHIV-89.6 plasmid was obtained from J. Sodroski (Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.). Recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing full-length (VV-239env) and truncated (VV-239T) SIVmac239 Env proteins were previously described by Ritter et al. (34), and VVenv1 expressing the BH10 Env protein was described by Owens and Compans (31). A recombinant vaccinia virus encoding a truncated Env protein of HIV-1 89.6 was constructed as follows. The HIV-1 89.6 truncated env gene was obtained by PCR amplification from the HIV-1 89.6 plasmid with the following primers: a 5' primer introducing an EcoRI site, 5'-GAGAAGAATTCAGTGGCAATGAGAGTGAAGG-3', and a 3' primer introducing an NheI site and a premature stop codon after the codon for amino acid 17 in the cytoplasmic domain, 5'-CCTGTCGGCTAGCCTCGATCATGGGAGGAGGGTCTGAAACGATAATG. The PCR product was then digested by EcoRI and NheI and ligated into EcoRI- and NheI-predigested pRB21 as a donor plasmid for vaccinia virus recombination. The recombinant vaccinia virus was obtained by a plaque selection system using recipient vaccinia virus vRB12, described by Blasco and Moss (4). The plasmid pIIIenv3-1, encoding the Env protein of the HXB2 strain of HIV-1, was obtained from the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Division of AIDS (NIH). The Tat-responsive HIV long terminal repeat in pIIIenv3-1 was used to promote expression of HXB2 Rev and Env. The helper plasmid pCMVtat was kindly provided by Steven Bartz (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Wash.). Virus-infected H9/HTLV-IIIB NIH 1983 cells were obtained from the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, and the supernatant was used to infect HUT78 cells. HIV-1 IIIB was produced by continued passage of infected HUT78 cells, and virus stock was prepared as described previously (46). To prepare HIV-1 89.6 virus, 293T cells were transfected with p89.6 (from the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program). At 48 h posttransfection, DMEM was removed and the cells were washed once in RPMI 1640. Then 2 x 106 CEMx174 cells were added to a plate in 5 ml of RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal calf serum and cocultured overnight. The following day, CEMx174 cells were removed from virus-producing 293T cells and placed in T-25 flasks for continued passage. SIVmac1A11 virus stock was described previously (46).
Monoclonal antibodies, antisera, and proteins. SIM.2 and SIM.4 antibodies recognizing human CD4 and recombinant soluble human CD4 were provided by the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program. The recombinant IIIB gp120 protein (baculovirus expressed) was obtained from Intracel (Cambridge, Mass.). Anti-mouse immunoglobulin G peroxidase conjugate was obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, Mo.).
Screening of the porphyrins' ability to prevent HIV infection. Porphyrin stock solutions were prepared at concentrations of 5 mg/ml, diluted 100-fold in growth medium, and mixed with virus stock. Samples were left in the dark at room temperature for 1 h. For MAGI and sMAGI assays, 25 µl of virus-compound mixture was mixed with 225 µl of growth medium containing DEAE-dextran (15 µg/ml) and 50 µl was added to wells with confluent monolayers of MAGI or sMAGI cells (on a 96-well plate). At 2 h postinfection, an additional 200 µl of complete DMEM was added. After 3 days virucidal activity was measured by removal of the media, fixation with 1% formaldehyde and 0.2% glutaraldehyde, and staining with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside (X-Gal). We observed about 50 to 60 separate blue nuclei per well for the positive control. Scoring of blue nuclei in a 96-well format was greatly enhanced by using a planar lens (Olympus; x4) to visualize the entire well. For determining virus titers we used RT (Roche), MAGI (20), and sMAGI (5) assays. Comparison of the number of blue cells in wells infected with compound-treated virus to the number found in wells infected with untreated virus was used to determine residual viral infectivity (expressed as a percentage). Numerical data reported are the averages of three experiments, each run in duplicate.
Procedure for removal of unbound porphyrin. Filtration was used to separate free compounds from the virus. Initial tests were performed on a large scale (without virus) so that the concentration of porphyrin could be measured spectroscopically (1601 spectrometer; Cary). Stock solutions of the porphyrin (5 mg/ml) were diluted 100-fold with medium. This solution was in turn diluted 50-fold with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). This solution (9 ml) was placed in a filtration apparatus (Centriplus YM-100; 100,000 MWCO; Millipore, Bedford, Mass.) and centrifuged. After three serial filtrations, the experimental concentration was compared to that expected on the basis of simple dilution calculations. For TPPC, with carboxylic acid groups on each of the porphyrin phenyl rings, three serial filtrations-dilutions left about a factor of two more porphyrin in solution than expected from simple dilution calculations. A similar experiment was run with TPPS4,Cu. This sulfonated porphyrin did not pass through the membrane as readily. In this case, the three serial filtrations-dilutions left about a factor of 35 more porphyrin than expected from simple dilution calculations.
In the corresponding biological experiments, 50 µl of the virus-compound mixture was mixed with 450 µl of PBS and loaded into a reservoir with a filter (Microcon YM-100; Millipore Corporation). The sample reservoir was placed into an Eppendorf tube and spun at 10,000 rpm for 3 min. To collect the sample, the reservoir was inverted into a new Eppendorf tube and spun again (recovery spin). The volume of the sample after the recovery spin (about 50 µl) was readjusted to 500 µl with PBS, and the reservoir was spun with a new filter. The procedure was repeated a total of four times. Mathematically, this should have resulted in a 1,000-fold dilution of the porphyrin. From the control experiments, we conclude that the actual dilution was probably about 500-fold for nonsulfonated porphyrins and about 30-fold for sulfonated porphyrins. The final volume was adjusted up to 100 µl with PBS. To this was added 100 µl of 2x DMEM containing 20% fetal bovine serum and 30 µg of DEAE-dextran/ml; 50 µl of the resulting solution was added to the MAGI cells. Controls were tested similarly.
gp120-CD4 binding assay. To investigate the possible effect of porphyrins on the binding of HIV-1 IIIB gp120 to CD4, we developed a gp120-CD4 binding assay. The assay was developed by modifying that associated with a capture gp120 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Intracel Corporation). Briefly, a 96-well plate was coated with soluble CD4 and 0.5 µg of HIV-1 IIIB gp120 per well and was incubated in the presence or absence of test compounds for 1 h at room temperature. After four washes with buffer to remove unbound proteins, the bound gp120 was detected by anti-gp120 peroxidase-conjugated antibodies and quantitated by the protocol provided by the manufacturer.
Cell fusion assays. For cell fusion assays we compared three different expression systems: (i) a recombinant vaccinia virus expression system which is able to express high levels of Env, (ii) a plasmid expression system which is able to express Env proteins in the absence of other HIV proteins or vaccinia virus proteins, and (iii) cells persistently infected with HIV-1 IIIB or HIV-1 89.6. For recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing HIV-1 Env proteins, HEp-2 cells were infected at a multiplicity of infection of 5. After 24 h cells were collected and counted, and about 2.5 x 103 cells were added to 3T3.T4.CXCR4 or 3T3.T4.CCR5 cell monolayers in 96-well plates in 100 µl of medium in the presence or absence of the test compounds.
For the second assay we transfected 293T cells by the calcium phosphate precipitation method with the plasmid pIIIenv3-1 expressing the HIV-1 Env protein (HXB2 Env) with a long terminal repeat promoter and cotransfected the cells with helper plasmid pCMVTAT at a ratio of 10:1 or with plasmids expressing simian immunodeficiency virus Env proteins by using a cytomegalovirus promoter as described above. After 48 h cells were collected and cocultured with uninfected cells as in the previous assay.
As a third system we used HUT78 cells persistently infected with HIV-1 IIIB or CEMx174 cells persistently infected with HIV-1 89.6. The infected cells were counted and cocultured with uninfected cells as in the previous assays.
For all fusion assays, after 5 or 20 h of cocultivation, the level of cell fusion induced by the untreated recombinant or virus-infected cells and the extent of fusion inhibition by the test compounds were evaluated by microscopic observation. Fusion activities were determined by counting the nuclei in syncytia and comparing the resulting number with the total number of nuclei.
Cytotoxicity test. A trypan blue exclusion test (42) was used. Compounds at a concentration of 50 µg/ml in growth medium were added to a 96-well plate with MAGI cells. After 72 h cells were detached by a 0.25% trypsin-0.05% EDTA solution and diluted 1:10 in growth medium. To test cell viability, we mixed 1 part of 0.4% trypan blue and 9 parts of diluted cells, incubated the mixture for about 2 min at room temperature, and applied a drop of the trypan blue-cell mixture to a hemacytometer. Using a binocular microscope we then counted stained (nonviable) and unstained (viable) cells. The fraction of viable cells was calculated as the number of unstained cells in the wells treated with compound as a percentage of the number in control wells.
Therapeutic indices. The 50% cytotoxic concentration (CC50) was defined as the concentration of compound that reduced the viability of cells by 50% (calculated from four different concentrations of porphyrin). The concentration achieving 50% protection was defined as the 50% effective concentration (EC50). The selective index value was defined as the CC50/EC50 ratio.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Some studies of porphyrin inhibition of viruses involve photoexcitation of a diamagnetic porphyrin, resulting in the production of singlet oxygen or free radicals or both, which are the agents that damage the viruses (24, 30). Photoactivation was not significant in the present study. In particular, diamagnetic derivatives (which are photoactive) were not in general more active than paramagnetic derivatives (which are not photoactive); e.g., the Fe(III) (paramagnetic), Mn(II) (paramagnetic), and Zn(II) (diamagnetic) derivatives of protoporphyrin gave 80, 65, and 52% inhibition, respectively, indicating that photoactivation does not play a significant role in viral inactivation.
Metallo-TPPS4 derivatives.
A series of metalloderivatives of TPPS4 was evaluated (Fig. 2). This series has the advantage that each porphyrin has a unique structure, e.g., that all sulfonates are in the 4 position and that each porphyrin has one (and only one) sulfonate on each of the phenyl rings. Metalloderivatives without axial ligands (TPPS4 and its Cu chelate produced 93 and 97% inhibition, respectively) were more effective in preventing infection than derivatives with axial ligands (the Sn, Co, and Gd chelates produced 44, 63, and 68% inhibition, respectively). This relationship may indicate that axial ligands have undesirable steric interactions with the biological target. Some TPPS4 derivatives stack significantly in solution (9, 32, 35). To determine whether the monomeric form of the porphyrin was important for the activity, the self-stacking of these derivatives was evaluated by measuring the optical spectrum of each of the metallo-TPPS4 derivatives as a function of added NaCl. Previous work has shown that this measurement gives data allowing a good estimate of the relative ease of porphyrin stacking (17). The TPPS derivatives evaluated stacked the order TPPS
Ni
Pd > Cu > VO > Mn, Sn > Co, Gd, Ru, TiO (data not shown). There was a general correlation between the propensity to self-stack in solution and the ability of these TPPS4 chelates to block infection by HIV; the derivatives which self-stack were more active in blocking HIV infection. Because self-stacking is greater for derivatives without axial ligands (no metal [e.g., Cu and Ni]), the effect may be due to the enhanced binding of planar species at the biological site rather than stacking per se. As observed for the natural porphyrins, there was no correlation between anti-HIV activity and the paramagnetic or diamagnetic nature of the central metal, indicating that photoactivation does not play a role in virus inhibition.
|
|
|
|
We found that TNapPS and TAnthPS had high anti-HIV activity in the screening assay (without removal of free compound) as well as after removal of compounds by the filtration-dilution method, with about 90 to 99% inactivation of the virus either with or without filtration. This demonstrates that the compounds exhibit virucidal activity, i.e., that the virus has been rendered noninfectious on the time scale of the experiment. TPP(2,6-F2)S,Cu inhibited about 95% of the virus in the screening assay and about 80% of the virus after filtration-dilution. TMPS,Co and TPP(2,6-F2)S,Fe had about 80% anti-HIV activity in the screening assay and about 20 to 40% anti-HIV activity after filtration-dilution. The partial recovery of virus infectivity observed with these compounds may be due to disassociation of the porphyrin from the viral envelope structure during the filtration-dilution.
Activity with other lentiviruses. To investigate whether the compounds with high activity would inactivate other HIV strains and lentiviruses, we extended our studies to HIV-1 89.6 and SIVmac1A11. We selected the most active compounds against HIV-1 IIIB, TNapPS, TAnthPS, and TPP(2,6-F2)S,Cu, and also used two compounds with intermediate activity, TPPS4,Co and TPPS4,Ag. We found that both viruses were sensitive to the most active compounds, TNapPS, with 76% of 89.6 and 88% of SIVmac1A11 being inactivated, TAnthPS, with 90% of 89.6 and 84% of SIVmac1A11 being inactivated, and TPP(2,6-F2)S,Cu, with 98% of HIV 89.6 and 84% of SIVmac1A11 being inactivated (data not shown). We also observed that the compounds TPPS4,Co and TPPS4,Ag inactivated about 50 to 70% of HIV-1 89.6 infectivity. Thus, the porphyrins with activity against a laboratory-adapted virus (IIIB) were also active against a primary HIV isolate (89.6) as well as against simian immunodeficiency virus.
Toxicity. We used a trypan blue exclusion test to determine possible toxicity of the test compounds. Compounds at a concentration of 50 µg/ml in growth medium were added to MAGI cells. This concentration is the same as that used for pretreatment of virus; however, it is 10-fold higher than that used when the compounds are applied to MAGI cells for a virus assay. After 72 h, a trypan blue assay was used to compare the viability of cells treated with compounds to that of untreated cells. Of the three most active compounds, TAnthPS did not have any detectable toxic effect. TNapPS and TPP(2,6-F2)S,Cu showed 55 and 60% toxicity, respectively. The most active of the natural porphyrins, DPEG,Fe, also did not have any detectable toxic effect. Three natural porphyrins with no activity were also tested for toxicity. Cells treated with DP,Mn were 100% viable, those treated with DP,Cu were about 71% viable, and those treated with DP,Co were about 59% viable. TPP4ClS, the sulfonated TPP with one halogen with the best activity against HIV, showed about 50% toxicity. TPP3ClS, also a member of this class, was found to be too toxic for accurate measurement of activity of virus inhibition. The most active of the sulfonated TPP derivatives with two halogens, TPP(2,6-F2)S, showed about 50% toxicity. All of these data indicate that there is no correlation of virucidal activity and toxicity. It is encouraging that a number of the most active compounds in each class showed no detectable toxic effect.
Therapeutic indices for three of the most active compounds were determined by measuring both activity and toxicity at four concentrations of porphyrin. TNapPS (EC50 = 5 µg/ml; CC50 = 75 µg/ml), TPP(2,6-F2)S,Cu (EC50 = 5 µg/ml; CC50 = 250 µg/ml), and TPPS3 (EC50 = 5 µg/ml; CC50 = 50 µg/ml) had CC50/EC50 values of 15, 50, and 10, respectively.
Effect of porphyrins on interaction of gp120 with CD4. To investigate the site of action of the porphyrins, we initially investigated the effects of the binding of gp120 to its primary receptor, CD4 (10). CD4 binding results in a conformational change in gp120 (37) that enables it to interact with a coreceptor, generally either CCR5 or CXCR4 (21). To investigate the effect of porphyrins on the binding of gp120 to CD4, we used the gp120-CD4 binding assay described in Materials and Methods. We tested the inhibition of binding using three groups of compounds. Four of the porphyrins [TNapPS, TAnthPS, TPP(2,6-F2)S, and TPP(2,6-F2)S,Cu] from the group with the highest activity against HIV were found to completely inhibit the binding of gp120 to CD4 (Fig. 6). TPP4ClS showed about 97% inhibition of HIV and 85% inhibition of gp120-CD4 binding. TPP2FS had about 80% activity against HIV and 81% inhibition of gp120-CD4 binding. A third control group of porphyrins, which did not have significant anti-HIV activity (e.g., DP,Cu and DP,Mn), also did not inhibit binding or had only low activity. A greater effect on binding than on infectivity was observed when we used a gp120-CD4 binding assay to investigate the effective concentration. These results show a general correlation between activity against HIV and inhibition of gp120 binding to CD4, although the latter was found to be more sensitive to inhibition by compounds with intermediate levels of activity against HIV.
|
|
|
We also used a plasmid expression system that is able to express Env proteins in the absence of other HIV proteins or vaccinia virus proteins (pIIIenv). As with the systems above, we observed complete inhibition of HIV-induced cell fusion with compounds TNapPS, TAnthPS, and TPP(2,6-F2)S,Cu. Many other compounds also exhibited complete inhibition in this assay.
Finally, we also examined fusion activity in cells persistently infected with HIV-1 IIIB or HIV-1 89.6 viruses, which were cocultivated with uninfected target cells in the presence or absence of test compounds. The fusion activity observed in this assay was comparable to that found by using plasmids expressing Env and lower than that observed with Env expressed by vaccinia virus. The results of fusion inhibition by the compounds tested correlated well with those observed by using the other two expression systems (data not shown).
These results demonstrate that the porphyrins with high or intermediate levels of activity against HIV are able to effectively inhibit the membrane fusion activity of the viral Env proteins, a biological function that is important for viral entry as well as the induction of viral cytopathic effects.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A major mechanism for activity against HIV may involve porphyrin binding to the V3 loop of gp120. Our results indicate that the porphyrins blocked the binding of gp120 to CD4 and inhibited the cell fusion activity of Env proteins when expressed from recombinant vectors. These results showed that an important target of these compounds is the viral Env protein. Neurath et al. (26, 27) have correlated the anti-HIV activity by using an assay for cytotoxicity on a T-cell line that measures the inhibition of the interaction between gp120 and antibodies specific for the V3 hypervariable loop of this protein. In this series of approximately 20 porphyrins from both the natural and synthetic classes, there was no clear correlation overall between inhibition of antibody binding to gp120 and overall activity in an antiviral assay. However, there was a correlation for the most active members of the series. Debnath et al. have found an excellent correlation between predicted and observed anti-HIV-1 activity by using a 3D QSAR model (11). For a data set composed primarily of natural porphyrins and TPPC derivatives, they observed that the active site apparently is best accommodated by a porphyrin bearing three negatively charged substituents and groups which can provide positive van der Waals interactions at positions corresponding to the 2 and 4 positions of protoporphyrin.
We observed that porphyrins were able to inhibit the cell fusion activity of the HIV Env protein. To exclude the possibility that such an inhibitory effect could be due to an indirect effect, we demonstrated that cell fusion induced by recombinant vectors in the absence of any other HIV protein was also sensitive to inhibition by porphyrins. These results provide strong evidence that the porphyrins are able to effectively inhibit an important function of the Env protein that is needed for viral entry. Song et al. have also correlated anti-HIV activity with syncytium inhibition for a series of synthetic anionic porphyrins and metalloporphyrins (38). No clear overall correlation was seen, but compounds with an EC50 versus HIV of <10 µg/ml all had EC50 values for syncytium inhibition of <40 µg/ml.
Currently several categories of compounds are undergoing thorough testing as potential microbicides to prevent HIV transmission. The first agents to be tested extensively were surface-disruptive agents (surfactants and detergents) that kill or inactivate viruses (vaginal virucides) such as nonoxynol-9. Unfortunately, this class of compounds causes damage to human tissues, leading to inflammation and ulceration (40). After extensive testing it was also determined that the use of this surfactant actually increases the risk of acquiring HIV infection during sexual transmission (19, 33, 45), and its development as an agent to prevent HIV infection has therefore been discontinued. A second group of compounds includes peptides and antibodies which enhance the normal vaginal defense mechanisms (23, 48). A possible limitation of such compounds is the difficulty of their formulation for use as vaginal microbicides. A third group includes nonspecific enhancers of normal vaginal defense mechanisms (lactobacilli, acid buffers, and peroxidases) (7). These compounds did not fully inactivate individual virus particles that are potentially capable of infection at sites of injury. A fourth group includes polymers such as Carraguard (39). This vaginal microbicide gel containing the red seaweed extract carrageenan has been shown to block HIV and other sexually transmitted agents in vitro. However, such polymers may not be fully protective because of possible escape of some virus particles from interaction with the macromolecules. The sulfonated porphyrins are polyanionic molecules. They inhibit viral binding to, fusion with, and entry into susceptible cells, as do some other polyanionic species, including polymers (14). Porphyrins, however, are relatively small molecules and are convenient for formulation into vaginal gels. Their interaction with the virus appears to be very rapid. For some of the molecules studied, removal of free compound did not result in significant recovery of infectivity, indicating that they are effective virucidal agents. For other molecules, removal of free compound results in partial recovery of infectivity, possibly due to their dissociation from target sites on surfaces of virions. However, this is not an important concern for their use as microbicides, because the compounds will continue to be present at sites of transmission during exposure to virus in vivo. Therefore, porphyrins represent a promising class of compounds for further development as microbicides to prevent HIV transmission.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Atia Alam, Tracy Tie, and Dahnide Taylor for technical assistance and Tanya Cassingham for assistance in preparing the manuscript.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |