Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2002, p. 3981-3983, Vol. 46, No. 12
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.12.3981-3983.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biomediche, Università di L'Aquila, I-67100, L'Aquila,1 Dipartimento di Scienze Morfologiche, Eidologiche e Cliniche, Sezione di Microbiologia, Università di Pavia, I-27100, Pavia,2 Ospedale di Circolo di Varese, I-21100, Varese,3 Dipartimento di Biologia Molecolare, Sezione di Microbiologia, Università di Siena, I-53100, Siena, Italy4
Received 15 May 2002/ Returned for modification 20 July 2002/ Accepted 27 August 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
TEM-92 is a TEM-type ESBL recently detected in clinical isolates of Proteus mirabilis and Providencia stuartii from France (3). It contains the same amino acid substitutions as TEM-52 (E104K, M182T, and G238S) (14) plus a Q6K substitution in the signal peptide region (3). TEM-52 was originally detected in a Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate from France (14) and was subsequently found to be widespread in other countries, including Italy (10, 12). It was reported to be associated to a decreased susceptibility to moxalactam (14), an unusual feature for most ESBLs (1). Kinetic properties of this enzyme, however, have not been analyzed in detail with a purified enzyme preparation. In this paper we report on the purification and biochemical characterization of TEM-92.
Cloning and expression of the blaTEM-92 gene in Escherichia coli. The blaTEM-92 gene was amplified by PCR from a P. mirabilis isolate (isolate 3Va) obtained at the "Circolo" Hospital of Varese (northern Italy) in 1998. Two primers, cgccggagctcATAAAATTCTTGAAGAC and cgcgggtaccTTACCAATGCTTAATCA, designed based on blaTEM-flanking regions (the regions that hybridize with the template are in uppercase letters) and containing a SacI and a KpnI linker (underlined) to be inserted upstream and downstream of the coding sequence, respectively, were used for PCR, which was carried out essentially as described previously (11). The resulting amplicon, digested with the two enzymes, was cloned in the pBC-SK plasmid vector (Stratagene Inc., La Jolla, Calif.) to obtain recombinant plasmid pMGP92. Sequencing of the cloned amplicon was performed on both strands as described previously (12) and confirmed the presence of a blaTEM allele encoding an enzyme identical to TEM-92 (3). In vitro susceptibility testing was carried out as recommended by the NCCLS (8).
Compared to E. coli DH5
(pBC-SK), DH5
(pMGP92) exhibited a significant reduction of susceptibility to various ß-lactams, including penicillins, cephalothin, cefotaxime, and ceftazidime, but not to cefoxitin, cefotetan, or moxalactam (Table 1). The resistance pattern was overall similar to that of P. mirabilis 3Va (Table 1). The presence of inhibitors in association with penicillins significantly lowered MICs for both strains.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. In vitro susceptibility to various ß-lactams of E. coli DH5 (pMGP52), producing the ESBL TEM-92
|
(pMGP92) grown aerobically, at 37°C, in 6 liters of Luria-Bertani broth containing chloramphenicol (30 µg/ml). Cells were harvested by centrifugation (13,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C), washed twice with 50 mM Tris HCl buffer (pH 8.0), resuspended in 100 ml of the same buffer, and disrupted by sonication (five times for 30 s each time at 60 W). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation (105,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C), and the cleared supernatant was loaded onto a Q-Sepharose FF column (2 by 20 cm; Amersham Biosciences, Milan, Italy) equilibrated with 50 mM Tris HCl buffer (pH 8.0). The ß-lactamase was eluted with a linear gradient of NaCl (0 to 1 M) in the same buffer. The fractions containing ß-lactamase activity were pooled, dialyzed at 4°C against 25 mM bis-Tris buffer (pH 7.0), and loaded onto a Mono P HR 5/20 column (Amersham Biosciences) equilibrated with the same buffer. The protein was eluted with 10-fold-diluted Polybuffer 74 (Amersham Biosciences). The fractions containing ß-lactamase activity were pooled, dialyzed at 4°C against 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), and stored at -80°C. During purification the presence of ß-lactamase activity was assayed by monitoring hydrolysis of 100 µM cefotaxime as a substrate, at 260 nm, at 30°C in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). Protein concentration was determined by the method of Bradford using a commercial protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Richmond, Calif.) with bovine serum albumin as the standard. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and analytical isoelectric focusing were carried out as described previously (11). After electrophoresis, the purified protein preparation appeared as a single 28-kDa band, and the purity of the preparation was estimated to be higher than 95% (data not shown). In isoelectric focusing, the purified protein exhibited a pI of 6.0 (data not shown).
Kinetic parameters of TEM-92 and interaction with inhibitors. Determination of kinetic parameters of the purified TEM-92 ß-lactamase was carried out essentially as described previously (13), using a Lambda 2 spectrophotometer (Perkin-Elmer, Rahway, N.J.). Enzyme assays were always performed at 30°C in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), containing 0.2 M KCl to prevent enzyme instability. Inhibition by clavulanic acid, tazobactam, and sulbactam was monitored with 100 µM nitrocefin as the reporter substrate. Inhibitor parameters with clavulanate, sulbactam, and tazobactam were determined as described previously (4). For determination of the 50% inhibitory concentration, the enzyme was preincubated with the inhibitor for 5 min at 30°C.
Under the experimental conditions used, TEM-92 was able to efficiently hydrolyze (kcat/Km >105 M-1 · s-1) several ß-lactams, including penicillin G, narrow-spectrum cephalosporins, cefotaxime, and cefepime, while ceftazidime was hydrolyzed somewhat less efficiently. A very slow turnover was observed with cefotetan, and no hydrolysis was detectable with moxalactam, cefoxitin, and aztreonam (Table 2). Although not hydrolyzed, cefoxitin and aztreonam were recognized by the enzyme (the latter with high affinity), while interaction with moxalactam was poor or nonexistent (Table 2). In comparison with TEM-3, TEM-92 showed an overall better catalytic activity against cefotaxime, suggesting that the M182T global suppressor mutation (16) present in the latter enzyme might provide a contribution in this sense.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Kinetic parameters determined with the purified TEM-92 ß-lactamasea
|
0), since the dissociation of the enzyme-inhibitor complex was measurable (Table 3). Both of these parameters could account for the remarkable increase of MICs of amoxicillin-clavulanate and of piperacillin-tazobactam if a larger bacterial inoculum was used (data not shown). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Kinetic parameters of interaction of TEM-92 with ß-lactamase inhibitorsa
|
position of the ß-lactam nucleus which is known to displace the hydrolytic water molecule present in the active site of class A ß-lactamases (7). However, production of TEM-52 was reported to be associated with reduced susceptibility to moxalactam (14). In this study we were unable to confirm that result with TEM-92, which differs from TEM-52 only in the presence of an additional mutation in the signal peptide. Moreover, kinetic analysis carried out with the purified enzyme showed that it is actually unable to efficiently hydrolyze moxalactam and cephamycins, although some of these molecules could interact with the enzyme with a moderate affinity. Concerning moxalactam, we were also unable to confirm the high-affinity interaction previously reported for TEM-52 (14). In a recent nationwide survey we demonstrated that TEM-52 was the most prevalent TEM-type ESBL in Italian hospitals (12). Since the sequence of the leader peptide was not investigated in that survey, the enzyme could also have been TEM-92, and this was actually found to be the case in a number of isolates that were subsequently investigated (M. Perilli and G. Amicosante, unpublished results). TEM-92 differs from TEM-52 in only one amino acid substitution in the signal peptide sequence (Q6K). Since the positively charged amino-terminal region of the signal peptide plays an important role in efficient protein secretion across the membrane (5), the substitution could have functional significance in expression of the resistance phenotype.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»