Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2002, p. 4035-4037, Vol. 46, No. 12
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.12.4035-4037.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Promoters P3, Pa/Pb, P4, and P5 Upstream from blaTEM Genes and Their Relationship to ß-Lactam Resistance
Marie Frédérique Lartigue,1,2 Véronique Leflon-Guibout,1,2 Laurent Poirel,3,4 Patrice Nordmann,3,4 and Marie-Hélène Nicolas-Chanoine1,2*
Service de Microbiologie-Hygiène, Hôpital Ambroise Paré Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Boulogne,1
Faculté Paris Ile-de-France Ouest, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines,2
Service de Bactériologie-Virologie, Hôpital Bicêtre,3
Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris,4
Le Kremlin Bicêtre, and Faculté de Médecine Université Paris XI, Paris, France5
Received 23 May 2002/
Returned for modification 24 July 2002/
Accepted 25 August 2002

ABSTRACT
Using an isogenic system, we have determined the impact that
the four promoters known to control
blaTEM gene expression have
on ß-lactamase activity. For both TEM-1 and TEM-30,
this activity gradually increased in relation to the presence
of promoters
P3,
Pa/Pb, and
P4 upstream of the corresponding
gene. Promoter
P5, only found upstream of the
blaTEM-1B gene,
was related to the highest expression of this gene.

TEXT
The extensive nucleotide sequence analysis of plasmid-mediated
blaTEM genes performed over the last 15 years because of their
role in resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins and to
amoxicillin-clavulanate has allowed us to observe that the expression
of these genes is controlled by four different promoters (
3,
6). The first promoter, called
P3 (Fig.
1,) corresponds to the
promoter of the
blaTEM-1A gene which is located on a Tn
3 transposon
and plasmid pBR322 (
10). The second promoter, called
Pa/Pb and
found upstream of the
blaTEM-2 gene, is composed, in fact, by
two overlapping promoters resulting from the mutation C

T at
position 32 according to the Sutcliffe numbering system (
10).
The -35 and -10 regions of promoter
Pa are TTGAAG and TACGCT,
respectively, whereas the -35 and -10 regions of promoter
Pb are GTGATA and TAATGT, respectively, the first 2 nucleotides
of the -10 region of
Pa corresponding to the last 2 nucleotides
of the -35 region of
Pb (Fig.
1). Chen et al. (
2), studying
the separately cloned promoters
P3 and
Pa/Pb, showed that the
Pb sequence which was present in the fragment containing the
promoter
P3 did not work as a promoter and that the overlapping
promoter
P3 were stronger than promoter
P3, with the increase
in strength resulting from both the strength of
Pa and the cooperative
activity of
Pa and
Pb. The third promoter, called
P4 by Goussard
et al. (
3), differs from promoter
P3 by the substitution G162T
(Sutcliffe numbering system) corresponding to the first nucleotide
of the -10 region of the promoter (TACAAT instead of GACAAT).
This substitution makes the sequence of the -10 region of promoter
P4 closer to the consensus sequence (TATAAT) (Fig.
1). We suggest
that the fourth promoter, which we have recently published,
be called
P5 (
7). This promoter has the same sequence as promoter
P3 at the -10 region but has a sequence at the -35 region (TTGAAA)
closer to the consensus sequence (TTGACA) than that of promoter
P3 (TTCAAA) (Fig.
1). To assess and compare the respective impact
of the four promoters on ß-lactam resistance, we established
an isogenic system in which the only difference consisted of
the type of promoter upstream from
blaTEM genes coding for either
a ß-lactamase susceptible (TEM-1) or resistant (TEM-30
or IRT-2) to class A ß-lactamase inhibitors.
By using primers 5'-ATA AAA TTC TTG AAG AC-3' and 5'-TTA CCA
ATG CTT AAT CA-3', four
blaTEM-1B genes, each preceded by one
of the four promoters, were amplified and cloned from previously
published
Escherichia coli isolates (
6). The
blaTEM-30 gene
coding for the inhibitor-resistant TEM-30 or IRT-2 enzyme was
also amplified and cloned from previously published
E. coli isolates but only with promoter
P3,
Pa/Pb, or
P4 upstream from
it, as a
blaTEM-30 gene controlled by promoter
P5 has not been
discovered thus far (
6). Plasmid pPCR Script (Cam
r) (Stratagene,
La Jolla, Calif.) and
E. coli strain Epicurian Coli XL10-Gold
(Stratagene) were used in the first stage of the cloning experiments.
After the sequences of inserted fragments (promoter and coding
region) were checked (automated cycle sequencing system on a
Perkin-Elmer R377 sequencer), the fragments were then cloned
into the
BamHI-restricted and dephosphorylated plasmid pACYC184
(Tet
r and Cam
r) and expressed in
E. coli strain NM554 (
8). The
size of the inserts and their insertion in the opposite orientation
of the promoter of the pACYC184 tetracycline resistance-encoding
gene were assessed by restriction analyses with
BamHI and
AseI
enzymes.
The E. coli NM554 transformants containing the different recombinant plasmids were then tested in three independent experiments for ß-lactam susceptibility by using the agar dilution method on Mueller-Hinton agar with a Steers multiple inoculator and 104 CFU per spot. The ß-lactamase activity of each transformant was also tested from the crude extracts of three independent cultures, as previously described (5). Briefly, ß-lactamase was extracted from 100 ml of an exponential-growth-phase culture at 37°C in Trypticase soy broth containing amoxicillin (100 µg/ml) combined with chloramphenicol (30 µg/ml). Bacterial suspensions were disrupted by sonication, and the ß-lactamase activity was measured from the crude extracts with a Pharmacia UV2000 spectrophotometer, using benzylpenicillin (100 µM) as the substrate. One unit of ß-lactamase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme which hydrolyzed 1 µM benzylpenicillin per min, and the specific activity was defined as the ß-lactamase activity per milligram of protein.
As indicated in Table 1, ß-lactamase activity as well as MICs of amoxicillin-clavulanate, ticarcillin-clavulanate, piperacillin, and cephalothin gradually increased from the E. coli transformant expressing the blaTEM-1B gene controlled by the P3 promoter to that expressing the blaTEM-1B gene controlled by the P5 promoter, with higher values for the two types of parameters when blaTEM-1B was controlled by the P4 promoter than when it was controlled by the Pa/Pb promoters. Concerning ticarcillin, the concentrations used in this study did not allow us to observe a gradual increase in MICs in relation to the promoter type. For piperacillin-tazobactam, we observed different levels of MICs: low MICs, from 1 to 2 µg/ml for the transformants whose blaTEM-1B gene was controlled by promoters P3 and Pa/Pb, respectively, and high MICs, from 128 to 512 µg/ml for those whose blaTEM-1B gene was under the control of promoters P4 and P5, respectively. The first two transformants were categorized as susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam, whereas the last two were categorized as resistant following the recommendations of the French Antibiogram Committee (9). These results indicate that the C
G substitution, which occurred in the -35 region of promoter P5, is more efficient in terms of promoter strength than the G
T substitution, which occurred in the -10 region of promoter P4. In fact, promoter P5 possesses the trimer TTG in the -35 region that was considered by Kobayashi et al. (4) to be the most essential sequence for determining promoter strength. However, although the overlapping promoters Pa/Pb possess the trimer TTG in the -35 region of promoter Pa, they were related to a weaker ß-lactamase activity than that related to promoter P5. This difference suggests that other nucleotide motifs than TTG in the promoter region might be involved in gene expression.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1. ß-Lactam susceptibility and ß-lactamase activity of TEM-1- and TEM-30 (IRT-2)-producing E. coli transformants according to the type of promoter upstream from the blaTEM-1B and blaTEM-30B genes
|
Concerning the three transformants containing the
blaTEM-30gene,
they differed from each other with regard to the ß-lactamase
activity and the ß-lactam MICs with the exception
of cephalothin. The lowest MICs, regardless of the penicillins
tested, were found in the transformant harboring the
blaTEM-30B gene preceded by promoter
P3, whereas the highest MICs were
found in the transformant harboring the
blaTEM-30B gene controlled
by promoter
P4; intermediate MICs were found in the transformant
harboring the
blaTEM-30 gene preceded by promoters
Pa/Pb (Table
1). For cephalothin, all of the transformants were susceptible.
For piperacillin-tazobactam, only those transformants with promoters
P3 and
Pa/Pb upstream from the
blaTEM-30B gene were susceptible.
For piperacillin, only the transformant with promoter
P3 was
susceptible. For the transformants with
blaTEM-30B, the lowest
ß-lactamase activity was observed in the transformant
harboring the
blaTEM-30B gene with promoter
P3, whereas the
highest activity was observed in the transformant harboring
the
blaTEM-30B gene with promoter
P4.
Overall, the increase in ß-lactamase activity observed in relation to the presence of promoters P3, Pa/Pb, and P4 was demonstrated by using either the blaTEM-1B gene coding for TEM-1 or the blaTEM-30B gene coding for TEM-30 or IRT-2. Thus, we were able to compare not only the expression of a given blaTEM gene in relation to different promoters but also the expression of different blaTEM genes in relation to a given promoter. In this study, it has been unambiguously demonstrated that, for any one promoter, the ß-lactamase activity measured by using benzylpenicillin as the substrate was higher for TEM-30 or IRT-2 than for TEM-1 from which the IRT enzyme is derived (1). However, despite this higher ß-lactamase activity, the MICs of the penicillins tested were lower, with the exception of amoxicillin-clavulanate, for the transformants producing TEM-30 or IRT-2 than for those producing TEM-1 (Table 1). This result emphasizes that MICs are linked to both the type of promoters upstream of the TEM-encoding gene and to the biochemical properties of the TEM enzyme.
In conclusion, although our isogenic system has probably slightly overestimated MICs and ß-lactamase activity for all of the transformants, as the vector used (pACYC184) is a low-number but not a single-copy plasmid, it has allowed us to compare the roles that the four promoters that have been described thus far and that are upstream from the blaTEM genes have on ß-lactam resistance according to the type of TEM enzyme involved.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Service de Microbiologie-Hygiène, 9 avenue Charles de Gaulle, 92100 Boulogne Billancourt, France. Phone: 33-1-49-09-55-40. Fax: 33-1-49-09-59-21. E-mail:
marie-helene.nicolas-chanoine{at}apr.ap-hop-paris.fr.


REFERENCES
1 - Chaibi, E. B., D. Sirot, G. Paul, and R. Labia. 1999. Inhibitor-resistant TEM ß-lactamases: phenotypic, genetic and biochemical characteristics. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 43:447-458.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Chen, C. 1984. Two improved promoter sequences for the ß-lactamase expression arising from a single base pair substitution. Nucleic Acids Res. 12:3219-3234.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Goussard, S., and P. Courvalin. 1999. Updated sequence information for TEM beta-lactamase genes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:367-370.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Kobayashi, M., K. Nagata, and A. Ishihama. 1990. Promoter selectivity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: effect of base substitutions in the promoter -35 region on promoter strength. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:7367-7372.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Laurent, F., L. Poirel, T. Naas, E. B. Chaibi, R. Labia, P. Boiron, and P. Nordmann. 1999. Biochemical-genetic analysis and distribution of FAR-1, a class A beta-lactamase from Nocardia farcinica. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1644-1650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Leflon-Guibout, V., B. Heym, and M. H. Nicolas-Chanoine. 2000. Updated sequence information and proposed nomenclature for blaTEM genes and their promoters. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:3232-3234.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Leflon-Guibout, V., V. Speldooren, B. Heym, and M.-H. Nicolas-Chanoine. 2000. Epidemiological survey of amoxicillin-clavulanate resistance and corresponding molecular mechanisms in Escherichia coli isolates in France: new genetic features of blaTEM genes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2709-2714.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Raleigh, E. A., N. E. Murray, H. Revel, R. M. Blumenthal, D. Westaway, A. D. Reith, P. W. Rigby, J. Elhai, and D. Hanahan. 1988. McrA and McrB restriction phenotypes of some E. coli strains and implications for gene cloning. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:1563-1575.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Soussy, C. J., G. Carret, J. D. Cavallo, H. Chardon, C. Chidiac, P. Choutet, P. Courvalin, H. Dabernat, H. Drugeon, L. Dubreuil, F. Goldstein, V. Jarlier, R. Leclercq, M. H. Nicolas-Chanoine, A. Philippon, C. Quentin, B. Rouveix, and J. Sirot. 2000. Antibiogram Committee of the French Microbiology Society. Report 2000-2001. Pathol. Biol. 48:832-871.[Medline]
10 - Sutcliffe, J. G. 1978. Nucleotide sequence of the ampicillin resistance gene of Escherichia coli plasmid pBR322. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75:3737-3741.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2002, p. 4035-4037, Vol. 46, No. 12
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.12.4035-4037.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Mulvey, M. R., Boyd, D. A.
(2009). TEM-168, a Heretofore Laboratory-Derived TEM {beta}-Lactamase Variant Found in an Escherichia coli Clinical Isolate. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 4955-4956
[Full Text]
-
Karami, N., Martner, A., Enne, V. I., Swerkersson, S., Adlerberth, I., Wold, A. E.
(2007). Transfer of an ampicillin resistance gene between two Escherichia coli strains in the bowel microbiota of an infant treated with antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother
60: 1142-1145
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tristram, S., Jacobs, M. R., Appelbaum, P. C.
(2007). Antimicrobial Resistance in Haemophilus influenzae. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
20: 368-389
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Robin, F., Delmas, J., Schweitzer, C., Tournilhac, O., Lesens, O., Chanal, C., Bonnet, R.
(2007). Evolution of TEM-Type Enzymes: Biochemical and Genetic Characterization of Two New Complex Mutant TEM Enzymes, TEM-151 and TEM-152, from a Single Patient. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
51: 1304-1309
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Robin, F., Delmas, J., Archambaud, M., Schweitzer, C., Chanal, C., Bonnet, R.
(2006). CMT-Type {beta}-Lactamase TEM-125, an Emerging Problem for Extended-Spectrum {beta}-Lactamase Detection.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 2403-2408
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Robin, F., Delmas, J., Chanal, C., Sirot, D., Sirot, J., Bonnet, R.
(2005). TEM-109 (CMT-5), a Natural Complex Mutant of TEM-1 {beta}-Lactamase Combining the Amino Acid Substitutions of TEM-6 and TEM-33 (IRT-5). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 4443-4447
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Delmas, J., Robin, F., Bittar, F., Chanal, C., Bonnet, R.
(2005). Unexpected Enzyme TEM-126: Role of Mutation Asp179Glu. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 4280-4287
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tristram, S. G., Hawes, R., Souprounov, J.
(2005). Variation in selected regions of blaTEM genes and promoters in Haemophilus influenzae. J Antimicrob Chemother
56: 481-484
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Baraniak, A., Fiett, J., Mrowka, A., Walory, J., Hryniewicz, W., Gniadkowski, M.
(2005). Evolution of TEM-Type Extended-Spectrum {beta}-Lactamases in Clinical Enterobacteriaceae Strains in Poland. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 1872-1880
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Walckenaer, E., Poirel, L., Leflon-Guibout, V., Nordmann, P., Nicolas-Chanoine, M.-H.
(2004). Genetic and Biochemical Characterization of the Chromosomal Class A {beta}-Lactamases of Raoultella (formerly Klebsiella) planticola and Raoultella ornithinolytica. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 305-312
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nelson, E. C., Segal, H., Elisha, B. G.
(2003). Outer membrane protein alterations and blaTEM-1 variants: their role in {beta}-lactam resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother
52: 899-903
[Abstract]
[Full Text]