Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2002, p. 1005-1013, Vol. 46, No. 4
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.4.1005-1013.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Departments of Virology,1 Protein Sciences,2 Molecular Biochemistry, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina3
Received 13 August 2001/ Returned for modification 8 November 2001/ Accepted 15 January 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Changes in the YMDD motif alter viral sensitivity to lamivudine in cell culture and affect viral replication, even in the absence of lamivudine. In cell culture, YMDD-mutant strains show a wide range of sensitivities to lamivudine, with the decrease in sensitivity relative to wild-type (wt) polymerase varying with the specific amino acid change(s): LM < MV << MI, LMMV, or LMMI (1, 16, 23, 24, 34). HBV strains with a single M552V or M552I substitution in the YMDD motif not only show decreased sensitivity to lamivudine but also display reduced replication competence, yielding lower levels of virus. A substitution of methionine at L528 in the upstream FLLAQ motif appears to modulate the impact of amino acid substitutions in the YMDD motif on both lamivudine sensitivity and viral fitness (15, 23, 24, 26, 28, 32, 35). The impact of the L528M substitution on both drug sensitivity and replication fitness differs depending on the specific substitution at M552 (i.e., M552V or M552I).
Similar substitutions of the methionine at position 184 in the YMDD motif of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase are reported to produce viral species that exhibit both reduced sensitivity to lamivudine and lower replication efficiency in vitro (4, 5). These studies demonstrated that the replication defect in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase containing the M184V substitution was exacerbated at low cellular concentrations of dNTPs. Reduced replication efficiency was also reported for YMDD-mutant HBV polymerases in cells treated with hydroxyurea, which depletes intracellular dNTP levels (28).
Allen et al. (1) hypothesized that changes in the catalytic domain of HBV polymerase resulting from substitutions at M552 and L528 would alter the affinity of the enzyme for dNTP substrates, thus affecting replication efficiency. In this report, enzyme kinetic data were derived for both wt and YMDD-mutant polymerase and used to assess the affinity of each of the polymerases for the natural dNTPs. In addition, inhibition constants for lamivudine triphosphate were determined for wt and YMDD-mutant polymerases. The dNTP pools in cells that supported the replication of wt and YMDD-mutant HBV strains were also determined.
|
|
|---|
Lamivudine triphosphate was obtained from Inspire Pharmaceuticals (Durham, N.C.). Cell media were obtained from Gibco (Grand Island, N.Y.) except as noted, and reagents and chemicals were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, Mo.) unless noted otherwise.
Construction of recombinant plasmids. The wt HBV genome was derived from pCMVhbv (14), which was kindly provided by Christoph Seeger (Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pa.). Plasmids carrying the HBV genome with YMDD substitutions have been previously described (1). The recombinant shuttle vectors used to construct baculoviruses for delivery of HBV genomes to mammalian cells were created by subcloning a 3.6-kb SnaBI to NotI fragment containing the wt or YMDD-mutant HBV genome into the SnaBI and NotI sites of the pFastBacMam vector, creating pFBMamWT, pFBMamMV, pFBMamLM, pFBMamMI, pFBMamLMMI, and pFBMamLMMV (11).
The convention used for numbering nucleotides and amino acids is based on HBV genotype A (17, 33, 49, 51).
Construction and culture of recombinant baculovirus. The recombinant baculoviruses were generated using the Bac-To-Bac system (Life Technologies, Grand Island, N.Y.). The viruses were amplified in Sf9 (Spodoptera frugiperda) cells grown in suspension in Grace's insect media (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FBS (HyClone), 0.1% Pluronic F-68, and 25 µg of gentamicin per ml. Virus titers were determined by plaque assay (36).
Transfection of HepG2 cells with recombinant plasmid and isolation of core particles. HepG2 cells in 225-cm2 flasks (catalogue no. 3001; Corning) were transfected with wt and mutant HBV-producing plasmids as previously described (1). HBV core particles were isolated by a modification of a previously described procedure (12). Briefly, 5 days posttransfection the cells were harvested in situ by lysing the monolayer in a hypotonic buffer containing 0.25 mol of sucrose per liter, 3 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.5% NP-40 (Pierce, Rockford, Md.). The cell debris was pelleted, and the cell supernatant was digested with 0.005 µg of RNase A per ml and 6 U of DNase I per ml. The treated lysate was pelleted through a sucrose step gradient: (0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 mol of sucrose per liter) in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)-50 mM KCl-5 mM MgCl2 (TKM buffer). The resulting pellet containing HBV core particles was resuspended by sonication in TKM buffer with 0.1% NP-40 and stored at -80°C.
Transduction of HepG2 cells with recombinant baculovirus and isolation of core particles.
For transduction of HepG2 cells with the recombinant baculovirus, HepG2 cells were seeded at a density of
8 x 104 cells/cm2 in T-225 flasks and incubated for 24 h. The cell monolayer was washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, and recombinant baculovirus was added at a multiplicity of infection of 10 to 50 PFU/cell in 10 ml of Sf9 medium. The cells were rocked gently for 1 h at room temperature, the inoculum was removed by aspiration, and 75 ml of HepG2 medium was added. The cells were incubated for 5 days, and core particles were harvested as described above for transfected cells.
Quantification of core particles by PCR. Yields of extracellular viral particles from transfected HepG2 cells were quantified by a modification of a previously described PCR-based method (21). Intracellular core particles were quantified as previously described (18). Briefly, the HBV DNA within intracellular core particles was extracted, resuspended in 200 µl of 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0), and quantified by PCR. With both procedures, the PCR primers used to amplify HBV DNA were EHBV372, 5'-TCGCTGGATGTGTCTGCGGCGTTTTAT-3', complementary to the minus strand at nucleotides (nt) 372 to 398, and EHBV460, 5'-TAGAGGACAAACGGGCAACATACC-3', complementary to the plus strand at nt 460 to 483. HBV DNA that has been replicated to a minimum of the first 1,457 nt (1829 to 372) of the minus strand is detected by this procedure.
Quantification of core particles from transduced cells by slot blot hybridization.
Plasmid pGEMX-HBV (18) was used as a control and diluted in Tris-EDTA to provide a series of seven samples ranging from 1,000 to 16 pg of HBV DNA/slot (1 pg of double-stranded HBV DNA is
3 x 105 genome equivalents). Ten microliters of control samples or core particle preparations were denatured in a final volume of 100 µl of 0.4 M NaOH, 0.01 M Na-EDTA at 100°C for 10 min. The samples were transferred to a Brightstar-Plus membrane (Ambion, Austin, Tex.) by vacuum blot using a Millipore MilliBlot-S system (Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass.). The membrane was neutralized in 2x SSC (0.3 mM NaCl, 0.03 mM sodium citrate, pH 7.0), and the nucleic acids were covalently linked to the membrane by the UV-Stratalinker 2400 in auto-cross-link mode (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.). The membrane was hybridized for 1 h at 42°C in Rapid-Hyb buffer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, N.J.) containing 2 x 107 cpm of radiolabeled probe 8F or 4RA. The radiolabeled probe was prepared with the 3'-end-labeling kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) with [33P]dATP (3,000 Ci/mmol; NEN Life Science Products, Boston, Mass.). Probe 8F (5'-ACGTTGCATGGAGACCAC-3') is complementary to nt 1603 to 1620 of the HBV genome and therefore detects genomes that have replicated a minimum of 226 nt of the HBV minus strand (Fig. 1). Probe 4RA (5'-TGAGGCATAGCAGCAGGATGA-3') hybridizes to nt 410 to 430 of the HBV plus strand. Probe 4RA detects genomes that have replicated the entire HBV minus strand and a minimum of 2,000 bases of the HBV plus strand (Fig. 1).
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematic of HBV genome replication. Pregenomic RNA is shown as a linear molecule, with the locations of direct repeats 1 (DR1) and 2 (DR2) indicated. After initiation of replication at the 5' end of the pregenomic RNA and translocation to the direct repeat 1 (DR1) at the 3' end, elongation continues and produces the minus-strand DNA. Second-strand synthesis [producing the DNA plus strand] occurs after circularization of the minus strand. Probes 8F and 4RA are indicated by the heavy black lines.
|
For comparison of the ratios of early-to-late replication complexes within each core particle preparation, the core particle preparations were diluted to equivalency with respect to hybridization with probe 8F.
Preparation of HBV core antibody capture plates. Antibody capture plates were prepared by sequentially treating 96-well plates (catalogue no. 3632; Costar, Corning, N.Y.) at 22°C as follows: (i) 2 h in 0.15 ml of 0.1 mg of neutravidin (Pierce) per ml in 50 mM sodium carbonate (pH 9.6); (ii) 1 h in 0.15 ml of biotinylated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (Pierce) diluted to 0.0015 mg/ml in wash buffer (100 mM sodium phosphate [pH 7.2], 150 mM NaCl, 0.02% Tween 20 [Pierce], 0.02% sodium azide, and 0.01% bovine serum albumin); and (iii) 1 h in 0.15 ml of rabbit anti-HBV core antigen antibody (Zymed, San Francisco, Calif.) diluted 1:300 in wash buffer. After each incubation, the plates were washed three times with 0.25 ml of wash buffer. Wash buffer (0.25 ml) was then added to each well, and the plates were stored in a humidified chamber at 4°C until needed. Similar plates were prepared with 1.5 µg of biotinylated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (Pierce) per ml and 0.67 µg of mouse anti-HBV core antigen monoclonal antibody (clone H3A4; Research Diagnostics, Inc., Flanders, N.J.) per ml in wash buffer.
HBV core polymerase assays.
The core polymerase assay was modified from a previously described protocol (12). The assay was performed in 96-well plates, and the reaction mixture consisted of 107 to 108 core particles in 33 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 230 mM KCl, 8 mM MgCl2, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.2% NP-40, 7 U of pyruvate kinase (Sigma) per ml, 2 mM phosphoenolpyruvate (Sigma), 35 µM unlabeled dNTPs (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and 0.001 to 4 µM
-33P-labeled dNTP (2,000 to 3,000 Ci/mmol; NEN) in a final volume of 10 µl. After termination with 90 µl of stop buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.05% Tween 20, 2 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 0.02% sodium azide), the reaction mixtures were transferred to a 96-well antibody capture plate and incubated at room temperature with shaking for 2 h. The wells were then washed five times with 200 µl of wash buffer (100 mM sodium phosphate [pH 7.2], 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20, 2 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 0.02% sodium azide). After the final wash, 170 µl of Optiphase Supermix (Wallac Inc., Gaithersburg, Md.) was added to each well and the radioactivity in the plates was determined by use of a Wallac 1450 Microbeta plus counter.
Extraction of dNTPs and calculation of intracellular concentrations in HepG2 and 2.2.15 cells. For extractions of dNTPs, HepG2 or 2.2.15 cells were plated in triplicate in 25-cm2 flasks (catalogue no. 3056; Corning) and treated as described below. Cells from two flasks were used for dNTP extractions. Cells in the third flask were trypsinised, and the number of cells in the monolayer was determined by cell count.
dNTPs were extracted from HepG2 cells that had undergone mock transfections (transfections with plasmids containing no HBV sequences). To mimic conditions under which core particles or extracellular viruses were harvested, cells were mock-transfected and (for core particles) refed on day 1, with dNTPs extracted 4 days later, or (for extracellular viruses) refed on days 1, 3, and 5, with dNTPs extracted 2 days after each feeding (days 3, 5, and 7 after transfection). Nontransfected HepG2 cells were also plated at low density (1.6 x 104 cells/cm2) and refed on days 1, 3, 5, and 7, with dNTPs extracted 2 days after each feeding (days 3, 5, 7, and 9 after the initial plating). For dNTP extraction, the HBV-producing cell line 2.2.15 was plated at a density of 104 cells/cm2 in complete media containing 10% FBS and refed with the same media on day 4 and with complete media containing 1% FBS on days 7 and 11. Extractions of dNTPs from the 2.2.15 cells were on days 4, 7, 11, and 15 after plating. Cellular dNTPs were extracted as previously described (37).
The extracts were analyzed by a method using a modification of the polymerase assay previously described (47), in a final volume of 10 µl. The reaction was stopped by adding 5 µl of stop mix containing 250 mM Na-EDTA and 50 mM sodium pyrophosphate. Three microliters of the reaction mixture was spotted onto DE81 paper (Whatman Inc., Clifton, N.J.), dried briefly, washed five times for 10 min each in 5% Na2HPO4, once in distilled water, and once in 95% ethanol. The paper was dried and exposed to a Molecular Dynamics Storage Phosphor Screen, which was then scanned using a STORM 860 instrument. Densitometric analysis was performed with ImageQuant Software. The total amount of dNTP in each extract was calculated, and the intracellular concentration was determined, assuming a cell volume of 2.6 µl/106 cells for both HepG2 and 2.2.15 cells (37).
Calculation of kinetic constants. Km values were calculated using the Michaelis-Menten equation. For calculating 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50s), concentration-response curves were fit to the Hill equation. Ki values were calculated by using the equation Ki = IC50/(1 + [S]/Km), where IC50 is the lamivudine triphosphate concentration resulting in 50% enzyme inhibition and [S] is the concentration of [33P]dCTP. Vmax values for core polymerase activities in assays in which [33P]dNTP was kept at a constant concentration while concentrations of the other three dNTPs varied were calculated by using the following equation: v = (Vmax x S)/(Km + S) + Y, where v is the observed enzyme velocity, S is the cellular concentration of 33P-labeled dNTP, and Y is the amount of [33P]dNTP incorporated in the absence of the other three dNTPs. Data were fit to the above equations by using Robosage, a Microsoft EXCEL (Redmond, Wash.) add-in program developed at GlaxoSmithKline (M. W. Lutz, personal communication). The nonlinear optimization function in Robosage is based on the Marquardt-Levenberg algorithm. In all cases, unweighted nonlinear least-squares regression was used to perform the fit.
|
|
|---|
50- to 100-fold higher (data not shown). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Yields of extracellular and intracellular HBV DNA in transfected culturesa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Mean Km values for each dNTP determined by using wt and YMDD-mutant HBV polymerasesa
|
Ki values for lamivudine triphosphate calculated from the core polymerase assays were compared to previously reported IC50s for lamivudine obtained from cell-based assays in this laboratory (1). As expected, the YMDD-mutant polymerases were less sensitive to inhibition by lamivudine triphosphate than was the wt enzyme. Notably, the range of Ki values and the ranking of wt and YMDD-mutant polymerases were similar to the range and the ranking of the YMDD-mutant polymerase IC50s (Table 3). In both systems, the LM and MV mutant polymerases were much closer to wt polymerase in terms of sensitivity to lamivudine than were the mutants LMMV, MI, and LMMI, each of which showed a decrease in sensitivity of
1,000-fold for the Ki of lamivudine triphosphate and
10,000-fold for the IC50 of lamivudine.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Comparison of wt and YMDD-mutant polymerases based on IC50s for lamivudine and on Ki values for lamivudine triphosphatea
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Estimated kcat values of wt and YMDD-mutant HBV polymerasesa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Catalytic specificities (kcat/Km) for wt and YMDD-mutant polymerases, determined by core polymerase assays using one labeled dNTP at Km and unlabeled dNTPs at 35 µM
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 6. Enzymatic activities of YMDD-mutant polymerases relative to wt polymerase, calculated at low substrate concentrations
|
With the exception of [TTP] (12.4 µM) in normal HepG2 cells grown at the lowest cell density, dNTP concentrations ranged from <0.1 to
4 µM (Table 7). Although individual dNTP concentrations differed slightly between the various extracts, the results from the other extracts were similar (data not shown). Cultures with higher cell densities (i.e., confluent cultures) tended to have lower concentrations of dNTPs. These observations are consistent with results from other studies, in which it was shown that rapidly dividing cells have higher concentrations of dNTPs than confluent or slower growing cells (6, 7, 39, 40).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 7. dNTP pools in nontransfected HepG2 cells, by day harvested
|
The midrange concentrations and relative amounts of dNTPs chosen were the highest levels found in HepG2 cells grown under the conditions used for harvesting core particles: dATP, 4.1 µM; dGTP, 2.0 µM; dCTP, 4.4 µM; and TTP, 4.6 µM. For one of the comparison assays, the concentration of [33P]dCTP was held at a constant 4.4 µM (>10 times the apparent Km for each polymerase) and the concentrations of the three unlabeled dNTPs were altered while their relative ratios were maintained (Table 8). The results indicated that wt polymerase is near its maximum velocity at the onefold concentrations, while the mutant polymerases require higher levels of dNTPs to achieve their maximum velocities. Moreover, the apparent activity differences between wt and YMDD-mutant polymerases increase as the levels of dNTPs decrease. In a slightly different assay the labeled dNTP was held constant at the apparent Km for each polymerase, thus normalizing the labeled dNTP concentration to kinetic equivalency. Therefore any kinetic differences between wt and mutant polymerases would be due solely to the levels of the other three substrates, as shown in Table 9 (note that the maximum rate calculated in this assay is still only one-half that of the true Vmax). Again it is apparent that even when the polymerases are kinetically normalized with respect to one substrate, the YMDD-mutant polymerases are not as efficient as wt polymerase when the concentrations of the other dNTPs approach levels seen in confluent HepG2 cells.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 8. Activities of wt and YMDD-mutant HBV polymerases at 4.4 µM dCTP and limiting concentrations of dGTP, dATP, and TTPa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 9. Activities of wt and YMDD-mutant polymerases at low dNTP concentrations
|
3,000 bases) and approximately 2,000 bases of the HBV plus strand (Fig. 1). As shown in Table 10, a greater percentage of wt core particles have reached the later stage of replication, indicating that under identical conditions of replication the YMDD-mutant polymerases are unable to extend the replicating DNA to the same extent as wt polymerase. Notably, the rank order of the differences is the same as that predicted by the kinetic data: wt > LMMV; LMMI > MI. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 10. Measurement of polymerization velocity of wt and YMDD-mutant polymerases, using probes specific for early and late HBV genomic replication
|
|
|
|---|
The system chosen for kinetic analysis was one in which the HBV polymerase activity measured is in the native state. During replication the polymerase is enclosed within the HBV core particle, using the encapsidated HBV pregenomic RNA as a template for the RNA-directed DNA polymerase activity and the minus-strand DNA as a template for the DNA-directed DNA polymerase activity. We assayed the polymerase activity found within partially replicated subviral core particles isolated from liver-derived cells which support HBV replication. This assay system is in contrast to other systems which have used recombinant HBV polymerases to obtain kinetic data (44, 52). In highlighting the fact that the Ki values reported in their assay did not match the values that had been reported in a study using a cell-based system, Xiong et al. (52) noted that the enzymes studied were partially purified recombinant protein preparations isolated from insect cells and that the primer template was activated calf thymus DNA, rather than the normal HBV template (K. P. Fischer, Letter, Hepatology 29:996, 1999; X. Xiong, Letter, Hepatology 29:996, 1999). While the Ki values determined from the core polymerase assay show as much as a 1,000-fold difference between wt and YMDD-mutant polymerases (Table 3), the assay using isolated polymerase preparations derived from insect cells showed a maximum difference of only 20-fold between the polymerases (52). The core polymerase assay also discriminates between the two single M552 substitutions by demonstrating that MV is much less sensitive to lamivudine triphosphate than is MI, consistent with results previously reported in cell-based systems (1, 26, 34). However, the opposite conclusion was reached with the recombinant polymerase assay, suggesting that recombinant HBV polymerases produced in heterologous systems cannot discriminate between natural substrates or lamivudine triphosphate as well as core polymerases in the native state. Moreover, the kinetic data were derived by using linear regression analysis (44, 52), which is not as precise as the nonlinear regression analysis used in this study (described at http://www.curvefit.com/avoid_linearizing.htm).
Determination of enzyme kinetic constants for an enzymatic reaction gives insight into the nature of the reaction, especially the interaction between substrate and enzyme. In a simple enzymatic reaction with one substrate, the Km value is the concentration of substrate at which 50% of the enzyme is bound to the substrate (43). When the substrate concentration is equal to the Km value, the rate of the enzymatic reaction is 50% of the maximal rate, Vmax. During replication the HBV polymerase utilizes five substrates: four dNTPs and a template primer. The steady-state velocities for wt and mutant polymerases are the result of the complex interplay of all reactants and depend on the Km values of each dNTP, the concentrations of each dNTP, and the nucleotide sequence of the template primer. Consequently, the kinetic equation describing the velocity of the polymerase reaction is quite complex. To simplify the interpretation of the data presented here, an apparent Km value for each naturally occurring dNTP substrate has been defined as the concentration of the selected dNTP yielding 50% of the Vmax value when the other three dNTPs and template primer are at saturating concentrations.
The higher apparent Km values for the mutant polymerases determined by the core polymerase assay indicate that higher concentrations of dNTPs are required for activity equivalent to that of wt polymerase. One indication that the Km differences are involved in replication efficiency is the fact that the differences in apparent Kms between wt and mutant polymerases correlated with the change in yields and not the changes in lamivudine sensitivity. Because of the complexity of the actual polymerase reaction, as noted above, both the actual concentration of each dNTP and their relative amounts will have a profound effect on the observed velocity. Thus, it was important to determine the levels and relative amounts of dNTPs in cells that both supported HBV replication and exhibited differences in replication efficiency between wt and mutants.
dNTP pools were determined in HepG2 cells that had been grown under a variety of conditions: (i) mock production of extracellular virus, (ii) mock production of intracellular particles, and (iii) normal passage. Pools of dNTPs were also measured in the HepG2-derived 2.2.15 producer cell line under conditions that induce overexpression of extracellular virus. For the most part, maximum levels of dNTP concentrations were in the low micromolar range (<5 µM), with the highest concentrations observed at very low cell density or under conditions used for mock intracellular harvest. In most cases at high cell densities the concentrations of individual dNTPs were
1 µM. The levels of dCTP in HepG2 cells reported in this paper are similar to those reported recently (22). A review of the literature indicates that similarly low concentrations of dNTPs are found in liver or liver-derived cells from the rat or mouse (41, 48). Nakamura et al. (29) measured dNTP levels in mouse fetal liver and in mouse adult liver; the dNTP levels for mouse fetal liver reported by these investigators are similar in ratio and concentration to those measured in low-density, rapidly growing HepG2 cells after 3 days of growth (Table 7). By contrast, dNTP levels in the liver of the adult dam were lower (<0.4 µM) than those found in dense HepG2 monolayers. These data indicate that as HepG2 cells increase in density, intracellular dNTP levels decrease to levels that may approximate those in normal adult liver (2, 20, 27, 29, 41, 48, 50). One caveat to these calculations is that assessment of the dNTP pools was based upon a cellular average and does not reflect possible intracellular compartmentation. If there are two distinct dNTP pools, with cytoplasmic dNTP concentrations lower than those in the nucleus (3), then actual concentrations available for HBV replication may be lower than our estimates indicate.
A comparison of the catalytic specificities, kcat/Km, of wt and mutant polymerases indicated that at low levels of dNTPs the relative velocity of HBV polymerase would be lower for the mutants than for the wild type (Table 5). Polymerase assays were performed to see whether the levels of dNTPs measured in HepG2 cells were sufficiently low to detect differences between wt and mutant polymerases. As predicted by the enzyme kinetic data, there were marked differences between wt and mutant polymerases at low levels of dNTPs (Tables 8 and 9). The results were similar whether the nonlabeled dNTPs were equimolar, with the labeled dNTP at Km, or whether the concentrations of the nonlabeled dNTPs varied and the labeled dNTP was present in high concentration. The differences in polymerase activity between wt and mutant polymerases based on kcat/Km calculations are almost identical to the differences observed in polymerase assays performed at low dNTP levels.
The results of the kinetic experiments and polymerase assays at limiting levels of dNTP substrates indicated that the elongation rate of polymerases containing YMDD mutations would be slower than the elongation rate of wt polymerase in HepG2 cells. In order to test this hypothesis, the extent of DNA polymerization within core particles of wt and YMDD-mutant HBV grown in HepG2 cells was measured. The results showed that in a population of core particles that had polymerized at least the first 200 nt of DNA, a much greater number of wt core particles than of YMDD-mutant core particles had extended polymerization by at least 5,000 nt, which is twice as many wt core particles as LMMV or LMMI core particles and three times as many wt core particles as MI core particles.
In summary, the results presented in this paper confirm the lower replication efficiency of YMDD-mutant HBV strains and show that they have reduced fitness. The YMDD-mutant polymerases have a lowered affinity for the natural dNTP substrates used for viral DNA replication, and cells capable of supporting HBV replication have intracellular concentrations of dNTPs that are low enough to influence the differences in the enzymatic rates between YMDD-mutant polymerases and wt polymerase.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»