This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Afeltra, J.
Right arrow Articles by Verweij, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Afeltra, J.
Right arrow Articles by Verweij, P. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2002, p. 2029-2031, Vol. 46, No. 6
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.6.2029-2031.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro Activities of Pentamidine, Pyrimethamine, Trimethoprim, and Sulfonamides against Aspergillus Species

Javier Afeltra,1 Jacques F. G. M. Meis,2 Roxana G. Vitale,1 Johan W. Mouton,2 Paul E. Verweij,1* and Eurofung Network{dagger}

Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Nijmegen,,1 Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius Wilhemina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands2

Received 29 November 2001/ Returned for modification 4 January 2002/ Accepted 11 March 2002


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
The susceptibilities of 70 strains of Aspergillus species were tested against seven different sulfa drugs and pentamidine by a microdilution method with RPMI 1640 and yeast nitrogen base media. Sulfamethoxazole, sulfadiazine, and pentamidine were active in vitro. The MICs obtained with RPMI 1640 were significantly higher than those with yeast nitrogen base. More studies are needed to further elucidate the action of these drugs.


arrow
TEXT
 
Invasive aspergillosis is now one of the most common invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients and carries high mortality rates (6). Invasive aspergillosis is a rare complication of end-stage AIDS despite the immunocompromised status of the host. Although invasive aspergillosis in AIDS is associated with neutropenia and corticosteroid therapy, other factors might contribute to the low incidence. Sulfonamides, especially trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), are antimicrobial agents frequently employed for prophylaxis in AIDS patients to prevent Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Sulfa drugs are active against Paracoccidioides brasiliensis (16, 17), and pentamidine (PNT) has some activity against yeast (2, 5, 13). We have recently shown that sulfamethoxazole (SMX) is active in vitro against Aspergillus fumigatus and therefore might help to prevent invasive aspergillosis in AIDS patients receiving SXT prophylaxis (1). The aim of this study was to further evaluate the in vitro activities of seven different sulfa compounds and PNT against Aspergillus isolates comprising six different species in two different media.

Seventy clinical isolates of Aspergillus were tested: 20 isolates of A. fumigatus and 10 isolates each of the following species: A. flavus, A. niger, A. nidulans, A. ustus, and A. terreus. Isolates were passaged twice in PDA at an interval of 5 to 7 days at 37°C. All isolates were tested in duplicate on 2 different days. A broth microdilution method was performed according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) guidelines (M38-P) (14). The drugs used in this study were trimethoprim (TMP), SMX, SXT, pyrimethamine (PMT), dapsone (DAP), sulfamethizole (SMT), sulfisoxazole (SSX), sulfadiazine (SDZ), sulfamethoxypyridazine (SMP), and PNT. All drugs were obtained as standard powders from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Steinheim, Germany. The final concentrations of the drugs ranged from 16 to 0.01 µg/ml for TMP and DAP, 320 to 0.31 µg/ml for SMX, and 16/320 to 0.01/0.31 µg/ml for SXT (1:20 dilution ratio), 4 to 0.004 µg/ml for PMT, 500 to 0.4 µg/ml for SMT, 128 to 0.12 µg/ml for PNT, and 400 to 0.3 µg/ml for SSX, SDZ, and SMP. Dimethyl sulfoxide was used to dissolve all drugs except for PNT, which was dissolved in water.

The drug dilutions were made in RPMI 1640 medium (with L-glutamine, without bicarbonate) (GIBCO BRL, Life Technologies, Woerden, The Netherlands) and in yeast nitrogen base (YNB) (Difco Laboratories, Sparks, Md.) and were prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions. Both media were buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.165 M morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Steinheim, Germany).

The tests were performed in 96-well flat-bottom microtitration plates (Corning, Inc., New York, N.Y.). Conidia were collected with a cotton stick and suspended in sterile water. After the heavy particles were allowed to settle, the turbidities of the supernatants were measured spectrophotometrically (Spectronic 20D; Milton Roy, Rochester, N.Y.) at 530 nm, and transmission was adjusted to 80 to 82% and diluted to obtain a final inoculum of 0.5 x 104 to 5 x 104 CFU/ml. The inoculum size was verified by determination of the number of viable CFU per milliliter after plating serial dilutions of the inoculum onto Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA).

Each suspension was diluted 1:50 in RPMI 1640 and in YNB to obtain two times the final inoculum.

After agitation, the plates were incubated at 35°C for 48 h. The visual MIC was defined as the lowest concentration showing prominent growth inhibition (MIC-2, approximately >=50% inhibition). For spectrophotometric endpoint determination, the optical density (OD) was measured with a spectrophotometer (MS2 reader, Titertek-Plus; ICN Biomedical, Ltd., Basingstoke, United Kingdom) at 405 nm. The OD of the blank, a microtitration plate to which a conidium-free inoculum had been added and incubated, was subtracted from the OD values. The percentage of growth for each well was calculated by comparing the OD of the well with that of the drug-free control. The in vitro fungicidal activity (minimal fungicidal concentration [MFC]) of each agent was determined by streaking 100 µl from each well that showed complete inhibition onto SDA plates. The plates were incubated at 35°C. The MFC was defined as the lowest drug concentration at which growth of less than one colony was observed, which corresponds to 99.9% killing.

The results were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney test, and differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

The inoculum size was checked by enumeration of colonies per milliliter of serial dilutions on SDA plates. These cultures showed that the final inoculum varied between 1 x 104 and 4 x 104 CFU/ml, which is within the recommended range (14). The MICs of all of the drugs in both media tested are summarized in Table 1. All sulfonamides and PNT showed higher MICs in RPMI medium than in YNB medium (P < 0.0001). The lowest MICs in YNB were obtained for SMX, SXT, SMP, SDZ, and PNT.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Comparison of the MICs of TMP, PMT, PNT, and sulfonamides in RPMI and YNB media for all of the Aspergillus species

SSX and SMT were inactive against most of the strains. TMP, PMT, and DAP were inactive against all of the isolates. SMX, SXT, SMT, SMP, and SDZ were active against the 20 A. fumigatus isolates (Table 2). In vitro, lower MICs were observed for A. niger for SMX, SXT, SDZ, SMP, and PNT and for SMX, SXT, SMT, SMP, SDZ, and PNT against A. nidulans. SXT and PNT showed the highest activity for this fungus. All of the drugs were less active against A. ustus and A. terreus, except for PNT.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. In vitro activities of TMP, PMT, PNT, and sulfonamides against Aspergillus species in YNB

No statistically significant difference in the MICs between SMX alone or in combination with TMP (SXT) was found (P > 0.05).

Considering the MIC/MFC ratios, fungistatic activity was observed for all drugs tested, except for PNT, which was fungicidal for A. nidulans. Nevertheless, despite the low MIC and the volume plated for MFC determination, carryover of drug could be present. More studies by other methods are needed in order to confirm this observation.

Sulfonamides act as a competitive antagonist of p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA), which is an integral component of the structure of folic acid. The result of decreased folic acid synthesis is a decrease in nucleotides, with subsequent inhibition of growth (21). Sulfonamides exhibit in vitro activity against a broad spectrum of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, parasites, and fungi (21), and the combination SXT acts synergistically against Paracoccidioides brasiliensis (3, 9, 16, 17, 20). The in vitro antimicrobial activity of sulfonamides is strongly influenced by the composition of the test medium, since the presence of PABA and folic acid in the medium inhibits their activity (21). RPMI is the standard medium recommended by the NCCLS (14) for in vitro susceptibility testing of yeast and molds, but contains four times more PABA than YNB (according to the manufacturer's manual). Consequently, MICs were found to be higher with RPMI than those obtained with YNB with the same inocula. Furthermore, RPMI poorly supports the growth of Aspergillus species compared with the richer medium, YNB (12). These factors probably contribute to the discrepancies found between the two media. There are no MIC endpoints for sulfa drugs against molds, but in previous studies, MIC-2 was used as endpoint against P. brasiliensis and C. albicans (4, 16, 17). Therefore, we chose the same endpoint in this study. The concentrations of sulfa drugs in plasma in general are between 100 and 200 µg/ml. For SMX, levels of 40 to 160 µg/ml are generally found (8, 21), which is near or above the MICs found for A. fumigatus, A. flavus, A. niger, and A. nidulans.

The mechanism of action for PNT is unknown, and the compound displays multiple effects in extracts of P. carinii (19). In vitro, PNT is active against a number of different protozoa and fungi (10, 11, 13, 19). In vivo, patients who received aerosolized PNT had less oral colonization with Candida species (15). Patients who receive 4 mg/kg of body weight daily by slow intravenous infusion can achieve a concentration of 0.5 to 3.2 µg/ml in blood (5). However, much higher levels are found in tissues, with concentrations up to 56 µg/g in lung, 300 µg/g in liver, and 123 µg/g in the kidney (5). When achievable drug levels are related to MICs, A. nidulans, A. niger, A. ustus, and A. terreus have MICs below the plasma drug concentration and tissue drug levels. These species are often clinically refractory to standard treatment with amphotericin B (7, 18), and therefore PNT might be useful as a treatment for infections due to these Aspergillus species.

More studies with different media and animal models and clinical studies are necessary to elucidate the potential of these drugs for the treatment of Aspergillus infections.

Appendix The Eurofung Network consists of the following participants: Emmanuel Roilides, coordinator, and Nicos Maglaveras, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece; Tore Abrahamsen and Peter Gaustad, Rikshospitalet National Hospital, Oslo, Norway; David W. Denning, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Paul E. Verweij and Jacques F. G. M. Meis, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Juan L. Rodriguez-Tudela, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; George Petrikkos, Athens University, Athens, Greece.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by a grant from the EC-TMR-EUROFUNG Network (ERBFMXR-CT970145) and by the Mycology Research Center of Nijmegen.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-24-3614356. Fax: 31-24-3540216. E-mail: p.verweij{at}mmb.azn.nl. Back

{dagger} Participants are listed in the Appendix. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Afeltra, J., J. F. Meis, J. W. Mouton, and P. E. Verweij. 2001. Prevention of invasive aspergillosis in AIDS by sulfamethoxazole. AIDS 15:1067-1068.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. 2
  3. Barchiesi, F., M. Del Poeta, V. Morbiducci, F. Ancarani, and G. Scalise. 1994. Effect of pentamidine on the growth of Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 33:1229-1232.[Free Full Text]
  4. 3
  5. Bartlett, M. S., M. M. Shaw, J. W. Smith, and S. R. Meshnick. 1998. Efficacy of sulfamethoxypyridazine in a murine model of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:934-935.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. 4
  7. Beggs, W. H. 1982. Combined activity of ketoconazole and sulphamethoxazole against Candida albicans. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 10:539-541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. 5
  9. Bernard, E. M., H. J. Donnelly, M. P. Maher, and D. Armstrong. 1985. Use of a new bioassay to study pentamidine pharmacokinetics. J. Infect. Dis. 152:750-754.[Medline]
  10. 6
  11. Bodey, G., B. Bueltmann, W. Duguid, D. Gibbs, H. Hanak, M. Hotchi, G. Mall, P. Martino, F. Meunier, and S. Milliken. 1992. Fungal infections in cancer patients: an international autopsy survey. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 11:99-109.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. 7
  13. Dannaoui, E., E. Borel, F. Persat, M. A. Piens, and S. Picot. 2000. Amphotericin B resistance of Aspergillus terreus in a murine model of disseminated aspergillosis. J. Med. Microbiol. 49:601-606.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. 8
  15. Joos, B., J. Blaser, M. Opravil, J.-P. Chave, and R. Lüthy. 1995. Monitoring of co-trimoxazole concentrations in serum during treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:2661-2666.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. 9
  17. Kunz, S., U. Junker, J. Blaser, B. Joos, B. Meyer, O. Zak, and T. O'Reilly. 1995. The scid mouse as an experimental model for the evaluation of anti-Pneumocystis carinii therapy. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 36:137-155.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. 10
  19. Ludewig, G., and C. Staben. 1994. Characterization of the PNT1 pentamidine resistance gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:2850-2856.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. 11
  21. Ludewig, G., J. M. Williams, Y. Li, and C. Staben. 1994. Effects of pentamidine isethionate on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:1123-1128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. 12
  23. Meletiadis, J., J. F. G. M. Meis, J. W. Mouton, and P. E. Verweij. 2001. Analysis of growth characteristics of filamentous fungi in different nutrient media. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:478-484.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. 13
  25. Miletti, K. E., and M. J. Leibowitz. 2000. Pentamidine inhibition of group I intron splicing in Candida albicans correlates with growth inhibition. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:958-966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. 14
  27. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1998. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of conidium-forming filamentous fungi. Proposed standard. Document M-38P. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  28. 15
  29. Nolan, A., P. J. Lamey, T. W. MacFarlane, T. C. Aitchison, J. Shaw, and J. Y. Sirel. 1994. The effect of nebulised pentamidine on the concentration of intra-oral Candida albicans in HIV-infected patients. J. Med. Microbiol. 41:95-97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. 16
  31. Restrepo, A., and M. D. Arango. 1980. In vitro susceptibility testing of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis to sulfonamides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 18:190-194.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. 17
  33. Stevens, D. A., and P. T. Vo. 1982. Synergistic interaction of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole on Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 21:852-854.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. 18
  35. Sutton, D. A., S. E. Sanche, S. G. Revankar, A. W. Fothergill, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1999. In vitro amphotericin B resistance in clinical isolates of Aspergillus terreus, with a head-to-head comparison to voriconazole. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2343-2345.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. 19
  37. Tracy, J. W., and L. T. Webster. 1996. Drugs used in the chemotherapy of protozoal infections, p. 999-1001. In J. G. G. Hardman, A. Gilman, and L. L. Limbird (ed.), Goodman & Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics, 9th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y.
  38. 20
  39. Walzer, P. D., J. Foy, P. Steele, C. K. Kim, M. White, R. S. Klein, B. A. Otter, and C. Allegra. 1992. Activities of antifolate, antiviral, and other drugs in an immunosuppressed rat model of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:1935-1942.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. 21
  41. Zinner, S., and K. Mayer. 2000. Sulfonamides and trimethoprim, p. 394-401. In G. L. Mandell, J. E. Bennett, and R. Dolin (ed.), Mandell, Douglas and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases, 5th ed., vol. 1. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, Pa.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2002, p. 2029-2031, Vol. 46, No. 6
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.6.2029-2031.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Canton, E., Peman, J., Gobernado, M., Viudes, A., Espinel-Ingroff, A. (2005). Synergistic Activities of Fluconazole and Voriconazole with Terbinafine against Four Candida Species Determined by Checkerboard, Time-Kill, and Etest Methods. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 1593-1596 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mukherjee, P. K., Sheehan, D. J., Hitchcock, C. A., Ghannoum, M. A. (2005). Combination Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18: 163-194 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yekutiel, A., Shalit, I., Shadkchan, Y., Osherov, N. (2004). In Vitro Activity of Caspofungin Combined with Sulfamethoxazole against Clinical Isolates of Aspergillus spp.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 3279-3283 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lionakis, M. S., Lewis, R. E., Samonis, G., Kontoyiannis, D. P. (2003). Pentamidine Is Active In Vitro against Fusarium Species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3252-3259 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Afeltra, J.
Right arrow Articles by Verweij, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Afeltra, J.
Right arrow Articles by Verweij, P. E.