Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2002, p. 2038-2040, Vol. 46, No. 6
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.6.2038-2040.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Antitrypanosomal Activities of Proteasome Inhibitors
Joseph Nkemgu-Njinkeng,1 Vera Rosenkranz,2 Michael Wink,2 and Dietmar Steverding1*
Abteilung Parasitologie, Hygiene-Institut,1
Institut für Pharmazeutische Biologie, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität, Heidelberg, Germany2
Received 15 October 2001/
Returned for modification 27 November 2001/
Accepted 20 March 2002

ABSTRACT
Seven peptidyl proteasome inhibitors were tested for in vitro
activity against
Trypanosoma brucei bloodstream forms. Two compounds
showed activity in the low nanomolar range. In general, trypanosomes
were more susceptible to the compounds than were human HL-60
cells. The data support the potential of proteasome inhibitors
for rational antitrypanosomal drug development.

INTRODUCTION
Trypanosoma brucei is the causative agent of human sleeping
sickness in Africa. Over 60 million persons are at risk of acquiring
the infection, and approximately 50,000 new cases are reported
annually (
21). If left untreated, the disease is fatal. For
chemotherapy of sleeping sickness only four drugs, with serious
side effects, are available (
5). Therefore, the identification
of novel targets for chemotherapy is urgently required if new
treatments of the disease are to be developed.
The proteasome is a multicatalytic proteinase complex which plays a critical role in intracellular protein degradation (4). Inhibitors of the proteasome have recently received attention as a novel class of anticancer drugs (2, 8, 12, 15, 17). However, drugs developed as potential antitumor agents could also be of use against sleeping sickness, as has been shown for the ornithine decarboxylase inhibitor D,L-
-difluoromethylornithine (3). We therefore investigated the trypanocidal activities of different peptidyl proteasome inhibitors against in vitro-cultured bloodstream form T. brucei.

Proteasome inhibitors.
N-Acetyl-leucyl-leucyl-norleucinal (Ac-Leu-Leu-Nle-CHO),
N-acetyl-leucyl-leucyl-methional
(Ac-Leu-Leu-Met-CHO),
N-benzyloxycarbonyl-isoleucyl-

-t-butyl-glutamyl-alanyl-leucinal
[Z-Ile-Glu(OtBu)-Ala-Leu-CHO],
N-benzyloxycarbonyl-leucyl-leucyl-leucinal (Z-Leu-Leu-Leu-CHO),
and
N-benzyloxycarbonyl-leucyl-leucyl-tyrosyl

-keto aldehyde
(Z-Leu-Leu-Tyr-COCHO) were purchased from Bachem Biochemica
GmbH (Heidelberg, Germany), and
N-benzyloxycarbonyl-leucyl-leucyl-phenylalanal
(Z-Leu-Leu-Phe-CHO) and
N-benzyloxycarbonyl-leucyl-leucyl-leucyl
boronic acid [Z-Leu-Leu-Leu-B(OH)
2] were purchased from Alexis
Deutschland GmbH (Grünberg, Germany). All compounds have
been shown previously to be inhibitors of the proteasome (
8-
10,
16,
17).

Assays.
Bloodstream form
T. brucei (TC221) and human myeloid leukemia
HL-60 cells were grown axenically as described previously (
11).
For toxicity tests, cells were seeded into 24-well plates at appropriate densities (104 trypanosomes/ml; 5 x 104 HL-60 cells/ml) in 1 ml of medium containing various concentrations (10-4 to 10-12 M) of proteasome inhibitors dissolved in 100% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The controls contained DMSO alone. In all experiments, the final DMSO concentration was 1%, which had no effect on the cell growth (11). After 48 h of incubation, living cells were counted with a Neubauer hemocytometer. The control cell counts were 106 trypanosomes/ml and 5 x 105 HL-60 cells/ml. Each experiment was set up in duplicate and repeated three times.
For detection of apoptosis, cells were exposed to proteasome inhibitors at various concentrations for 24 h, harvested by centrifugation, and fixed overnight with 70% ethanol at -20°C. Then, cells were washed twice with HBSS (Hanks balanced salt solution) and 5 min with 900 µl of HBSS plus 300 µl of 200 mM Na2HPO4-100 mM citrate (pH 7.8) and stained with 200 µl of HBSS containing 0.5 mg of RNase per ml and 0.5 µg of propidium iodide per ml. After incubation for 30 min at room temperature, the DNA content of propidium iodide-stained cells was analyzed with a FACScan analytical cytometer using CellQuest Software (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany). Cells from the sub-G0/G1 peak were counted as apoptotic cells (14).

Antitrypanosomal activities of proteasome inhibitors.
Peptide aldehydes are the best-characterized inhibitors of the
proteasome. These agents are substrate analogues, and cells
are permeable to them. Previous studies have revealed that peptide
aldehydes of the scaffold R-Leu-Leu-Xaa-CHO are the most potent
inhibitors of the proteasome (
1). Therefore, Ac-Leu-Leu-Nle-CHO,
Ac-Leu-Leu-Met-CHO, Z-Leu-Leu-Leu-CHO, Z-Leu-Leu-Phe-CHO, and
Z-Leu-Leu-Tyr-COCHO were chosen to have their antitrypanosomal
activities tested. Since peptide boronates are much more potent
inhibitors of the proteasome (
1,
8), the trypanocidal activity
of the boronate analogue of Z-Leu-Leu-Leu-CHO, Z-Leu-Leu-Leu-B(OH)
2,
was also investigated. Z-Ile-Glu(OtBu)-Ala-Leu-CHO was included
in this study because this compound has been shown to inhibit
the proteasome purified from
T. brucei (
13). All seven compounds
exhibited antitrypanosomal activities against bloodstream form
T. brucei, with 50% effective doses (ED
50s) and MICs varying
10,000-fold (Table
1). The most trypanocidal proteasome inhibitors
were Z-Ile-Glu(OtBu)-Ala-Leu-CHO and Z-Leu-Leu-Leu-B(OH)
2, with
ED
50s of 0.086 and 0.32 nM and MICs of 40 and 10 nM, respectively.
Thus, the antitrypanosomal activities of these two proteasome
inhibitors are comparable to that of pentamidine isethionate,
which is used to treat sleeping sickness (ED
50 range, 1 to 2.5
nM; MIC range, 5.8 to 35 nM [
11]).
The general cytotoxicities of the proteasome inhibitors were
assayed with HL-60 cells (Table
1). All compounds were also
active against the human cells, with ED
50s ranging from 1.1
nM to 20 µM. Encouragingly, the MICs of six compounds
were

100 µM, the highest concentration tested; only Z-Leu-Leu-Leu-B(OH)
2 had a MIC of 1 µM. However, the ED
50 and MIC ratios of
cytotoxic to trypanocidal activities were found to be in a modest
range for nearly all proteasome inhibitors (Table
2). Only Z-Ile-Glu(OtBu)-Ala-Leu-CHO
gave substantial ED
50 and MIC ratios, with values of 400 and
2,500, respectively. For comparison, anti-sleeping sickness
drugs generally have higher ED
50 and MIC ratios (
11).
Proteasome inhibitors have been shown to induce apoptosis in
many oncogenic cell types (
17), and trypanosomes have been reported
to be able to undergo apoptosis (
18-
20). This prompted us to
investigate whether the growth-inhibitory effects of Z-Leu-Leu-Leu-B(OH)
2 and Z-Ile-Glu(OtBu)-Ala-Leu-CHO, the two most toxic proteasome
inhibitors studied (Table
1), can be attributed to induction
of apoptosis. Based on hypodiploid DNA content, only 45% of
trypanosomes appeared as apoptotic cells compared to 90% of
HL-60 cells after exposure to Z-Leu-Leu-Leu-B(OH)
2 or Z-Ile-Glu(OtBu)-Ala-Leu-CHO
for 24 h (Fig.
1). The latter finding is in agreement with previous
observations that treatment of HL-60 cells with proteasome inhibitors
results in induction of apoptosis (
6). Since only half of the
trypanosomes appeared as apoptotic cells after treatment with
both compounds, it is questionable whether the trypanocidal
effect of proteasome inhibitors can be actually ascribed to
induction of programmed cell death in bloodstream form
T. brucei.
Targets other than, or in addition to, the proteasome may be
affected (
8,
17).
Although the compounds investigated in this study are not suitable
for clinical use because of their cytotoxic effects, the results
provide evidence that inhibition of the proteasome represents
a new approach for the development of antitrypanosomal drugs.
This finding may also be exploited in the future by utilizing
the wealth of information currently being generated on proteasome
inhibitors as anticancer agents (
8,
12,
15,
17). For example,
the relatively high trypanocidal activity of Z-Leu-Leu-Leu-B(OH)
2 suggests that novel boronic acid proteasome inhibitors currently
under clinical evaluation (
2) may provide a new class of anti-sleeping
sickness drugs in the future. Since trypanosome and mammalian
proteasomes differ in terms of their substrate specificities
(
7), specific and nontoxic proteasome inhibitors are the rational
choice for future antitrypanosomal drug development.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported in part by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
(SFB 544/Kontrolle Tropischer Infektionskrankheiten and Graduierten
Kolleg 388/Biotechnologie).
We thank Kathy Andrews for critical reading of the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Rd., Bristol BS8 1UG, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-117-9288254. Fax: 44-117-9257374. E-mail:
dsteverding{at}hotmail.com.


REFERENCES
1
- Adams, J., and R. Stein. 1996. Novel inhibitors of the proteasome and their therapeutic use in inflammation. Annu. Rep. Med. Chem. 31:279-288.
2
- Adams, J., V. J. Palombella, E. A. Sausville, J. Johnson, A. Destree, D. D. Lazarus, J. Maas, C. S. Pien, S. Prakash, and P. J. Elliott. 1999. Proteasome inhibitors: a novel class of potent and effective antitumor agents. Cancer Res. 59:2615-2622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3
- Barrett, S. V., and M. P. Barrett. 2000. Anti-sleeping sickness drugs and cancer chemotherapy. Parasitol. Today 16:7-9.[CrossRef][Medline]
4
- Coux, O., K. Tanaka, and A. L. Goldberg. 1996. Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65:801-847.[CrossRef][Medline]
5
- Croft, S. L. 1997. The current status of antiparasite chemotherapy. Parasitology 114(Suppl.):S3-S15.
6
- Drexler, H. C. A. 1997. Activation of the cell death program by inhibition of proteasome function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:855-860.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7
- Hua, S.-B., W.-Y. To, T. T. Nguyen, M.-L. Wong, and C. C. Wang. 1996. Purification and characterization of proteasomes from Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 78:33-46.[CrossRef][Medline]
8
- Kisselev, A. F., and A. L. Goldberg. 2001. Proteasome inhibitors: from research tools to drug candidates. Chem. Biol. 8:739-758.[CrossRef][Medline]
9
- Lynas, J. F., P. Harriott, A. Healy, M. A. McKervey, and B. Walker. 1998. Inhibitors of the chymotrypsin-like activity of proteasome based on di- and tri-peptidyl
-keto aldehydes (glyoxals). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 8:373-378.[CrossRef][Medline]
10
- McCormack, T. A., A. A. Cruikshank, L. Grenier, F. D. Melandri, S. L. Nunes, L. Plamondon, R. L. Stein, and L. R. Dick. 1998. Kinetic studies of the branched chain amino acid preferring peptidase activity of the 20S proteasome: development of a continuous assay and inhibition by tripeptide aldehydes and clasto-lactacystin ß-lactone. Biochemistry 37:7792-7800.[CrossRef][Medline]
11
- Merschjohann, K., F. Sporer, D. Steverding, and M. Wink. 2001. In vitro effect of alkaloids on bloodstream forms of Trypanosoma brucei and T. congolense. Planta Med. 67:623-627.[CrossRef][Medline]
12
- Murray, R. Z., and C. Norbury. 2000. Proteasome inhibitors as anti-cancer agents. Anticancer Drugs 11:407-417.[CrossRef][Medline]
13
- Mutomba, M. C., W.-Y. To, W. C. Hyun, and C. C. Wang. 1997. Inhibition of proteasome activity blocks cell cycle progression at specific phase boundaries in African trypanosomes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 90:491-504.[CrossRef][Medline]
14
- Nicoletti, I., G. Migliorati, M. C. Pagliacci, F. Grignani, and C. Riccardi. 1991. A rapid and simple method for measuring thymocyte apoptosis by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. J. Immunol. Methods 139:271-279.[CrossRef][Medline]
15
- Rivett, A. J., and R. C. Gardner. 2000. Proteasome inhibitors: from in vitro uses to clinical trials. J. Pept. Sci. 6:478-488.[CrossRef][Medline]
16
- Rock, K. L., C. Gramm, L. Rothstein, K. Clark, R. Stein, L. Dick, D. Hwang, and A. L. Goldberg. 1994. Inhibitors of the proteasome block the degradation of most cell proteins and the generation of peptides presented on MHC class I molecules. Cell 78:761-771.[CrossRef][Medline]
17
- Shah, S. A., M. W. Potter, and M. P. Callery. 2001. Ubiquitin proteasome pathway: implications and advances in cancer therapy. Surg. Oncol. 10:43-52.[CrossRef][Medline]
18
- Welburn, S. C., C. Dale, D. Ellis, R. Beecroft, and T. W. Pearson. 1996. Apoptosis in procyclic Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense in vitro. Cell Death Differ. 3:229-236.
19
- Welburn, S. C., and N. B. Murphy. 1998. Prohibitin and RACK homologues are up-regulated in trypanosomes induced to undergo apoptosis and in naturally occurring terminally differentiated forms. Cell Death Differ. 5:615-622.
20
- Welburn, S. C., S. Lillico, and N. B. Murphy. 1999. Programmed cell death in procyclic form Trypanosoma brucei rhodesienseidentification of differentially expressed genes during Con A induced death. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 94:229-234.[Medline]
21
- World Health Organization. March 2001. African trypanosomiasis or sleeping sickness. WHO Fact Sheet 259. [Online.] http://www.who.int/inf-fs/en/fact259.html.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2002, p. 2038-2040, Vol. 46, No. 6
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.6.2038-2040.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.