Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2002, p. 2358-2364, Vol. 46, No. 8
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.8.2358-2364.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Infectious Diseases Research Laboratory, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics,1 Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 941172
Received 21 May 2001/ Returned for modification 23 November 2001/ Accepted 17 April 2002
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In clinical practice, an oral dose of 300 mg of isoniazid per day is recommended regardless of gender. The 300-mg once-daily dose was therefore administered to both men and women in this study to determine the drug concentrations that would be expected in practice. Since women, as a group, are significantly lighter than men and therefore might have greater drug concentrations in plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar cells (ACs), we included gender in the stratification.
In subjects receiving isoniazid, free isoniazid, acetylated isoniazid, and isonicotinic acid appear in the urine in various amounts depending on the acetylator phenotype of the subject. Acetylator status can be ascertained by measuring the metabolism of caffeine (19, 32). Knowledge of acetylator status is important because it affects the pharmacology of isoniazid (25). Therefore, it was included in the stratification of our subjects.
Isoniazid is active against tubercle bacilli that are growing within cultured human macrophages (16). Drug concentrations within cultured human macrophages obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) approximate the concentrations in the extracellular fluid, suggesting that drug enters the cells by passive diffusion (20). Whether isoniazid penetrates into alveolar macrophages or ELF in vivo in humans has not previously been reported.
We (10, 11, 13, 14) and others (1-6) have developed techniques for the measurement in vivo of the concentration of drugs in pulmonary ELF and ACs. The purpose of this study was to compare the steady-state concentrations of isoniazid in the plasma, ELF, and ACs of healthy volunteers and men and women with AIDS and to assess the effect of acetylator status on the concentrations of the drug in these compartments.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isoniazid was obtained from a commercial source (Barr Laboratories, Inc., Pomona, N.Y.). A 300-mg tablet was administered orally once daily for a total of 5 days. The first dose of study medication was administered under direct supervision on day 1 in the General Clinical Research Center at the University of California, San Francisco. Subjects were observed for 30 min afterward for adverse effects. The second, third, and fourth doses were taken at home on the respective days according to verbal and written instructions and as documented in writing by the subjects. The fifth (last) dose was taken on the fifth study day under direct supervision. All doses were taken at approximately 9:30 a.m.
Bronchoscopy and BAL. Standardized bronchoscopy and BAL (10-12, 14, 15) were performed 4 h after the administration of the fifth (last) dose. The subjects' blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate, and temperature were recorded prior to and at the completion of the procedure. Throughout the procedure the subjects were monitored by fingertip oximetry.
Subjects were prepared with a 4% topical lidocaine gargle followed by a 4% topical lidocaine spray. Pledgets soaked with 4% topical lidocaine were then applied to each side of the posterior pharynx, followed by the application of topical 1% lidocaine more distally. No systemic sedation was used. A fiberoptic bronchoscope (FB-19H; Pentax) was inserted in the right middle lobe. The instrument was in place for approximately 3 to 5 min.
A total of four 50-ml aliquots of normal saline were instilled into the right middle lobe, and each was immediately aspirated into a trap. The specimens were kept on ice until they were frozen. The first aspirate was discarded. The second, third, and fourth aspirates were pooled. The volume of the pooled BAL fluid was measured and recorded. Measured aliquots of the pooled BAL fluid were sent to the clinical laboratory at the University of California, San Francisco, for cell count and differential.
Specimen handling. Blood collected in tubes containing sodium heparin was immediately centrifuged. The plasma was then separated and stored frozen at -80°C until it was assayed.
A measured volume of BAL fluid was immediately centrifuged at 400 x g for 5 min. The supernatant was decanted, and both cells and the supernatant were frozen at -80°C until they were assayed. Immediately prior to assay, the cell pellets were resuspended in 5% acetonitrile, sonicated for 2 min on a Dismembrator (model 550; Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pa.), centrifuged at 3,000 x g for 15 min, and decanted. The supernatant was then evaporated to dryness and reconstituted in 5% acetonitrile.
Isoniazid assay. Isoniazid concentrations in plasma, BAL fluid, and ACs were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), as we have reported previously (17). Analyses were performed with a Waters (Milford, Mass.) autosampler and an ESA (Chelmsford, Mass.) electrochemical detector set at +0.6 V. The isoniazid in plasma and alveolar cells was extracted with a chloroform-butanol mixture and was then back-extracted into dilute acid.
The mobile phase consisted of 70% 50 mM KH2PO4 and 30% acetonitrile-isopropanol (4:1; vol/vol) flowing at 0.8 ml/min. It was pumped through a 5-µm Phenomenex CN (Torrance, Calif.) reversed-phase column (250 by 4.6 mm) at ambient temperature. The retention times for isoniazid and the internal standard (diphenylcarbazide) were 4.7 and 8.3 min, respectively. The BAL fluid was injected directly onto a Polymer Labs Inc. (Amherst, Mass.) polystyrene divinylbenzene column (4.6 by 250 mm). A mobile phase consisting of 5% acetonitrile and 15 mM ammonium hydroxide flowing at 0.5 ml/min was used. The isoniazid retention time was 14.6 min. No internal standard was used. Peak areas were monitored, and the calibration curves were created with EZ Chrom software (Scientific Software, San Ramon, Calif.). The sensitivities of the assay with plasma, BAL fluid, and ACs were 100, 10, and 25 ng/ml, respectively. Weekly determinations of isoniazid concentrations in spiked plasma and phosphate-buffered saline stored at -80°C revealed no degradation of the drug. The precisions of the assay, defined by the coefficient of variation (CV), with plasma, BAL fluid, and ACs, were 6.7, 15.4, and 8.5%, respectively. The accuracies, defined by the relative error, with plasma, BAL fluid, and ACs were 2.4, 7.7, and 28%, respectively.
Determination of acetylator status. (i) Procedures.
Caffeine was used to determine acetylator status (19). A detailed history was taken. In addition, a physical examination was performed to assess factors that might influence drug metabolism, including smoking habits; intake of caffeine, food, and alcohol; ethnicity; drug therapy; and the presence of other diseases. Subjects were instructed to refrain from ingesting all methylxanthine-containing foods or beverages for 24 h. On the following morning, subjects received 200 mg of caffeine orally. Urine was collected between 4 and 8 h after administration of the dose. Urine samples were stored at -80°C until analysis.
(ii) To assess whether a subject was a slow or a fast acetylator, concentrations of 5-acetylamino-6-amino-3-methyluracil (AAMU), 1-methylxanthine (1X), and 1-uric acid (1U) were measured. The 5-acetylamino-6-formylamine-3-methyluracil (AFMU) in each sample was converted to AAMU with dilute sodium hydroxide; and the AAMU, 1X, and 1U concentrations were measured. The molar ratio of AAMU/[AAMU + 1X + 1U] in the urine collected at 4 h was used to classify slow and fast acetylators. Subjects with molar ratios <0.35 were classified as slow acetylators, and those with molar ratios >0.35 were classified as fast acetylators (19, 31).
Pharmacologic probe. (i) Method for xanthines and urates.
Urinary caffeine and its xanthine and urate metabolites were measured by the HPLC procedure of Muir et al. (24), with the following modification. A solid-phase cartridge technique instead of a liquid-liquid extraction was used to prepare samples for HPLC. Samples were applied to Certify cartridges (Varian Associates) with ethyl acetate and hexane washes. After the xanthines and urates were eluted with 15% methanol, HPLC was performed with a 3-µm reversed-phase Microsorb column and a 15% methanol mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min. A Hewlett-Packard 1090 HPLC instrument diode array detector and chem-station were used. The xanthines (including 1,8-methylxanthine as the internal standard) and urates were monitored at 270 and 290 nm, respectively. The chromatography was complete in 15 min. The precision of the assay, defined by the CV, was 3.8% for 1X, 1.1% for 1,7-dimethylxanthine, and 4.8% for 1-methylurate.
(ii) Method for AAMU. AAMU, the major metabolite of caffeine, was assayed by a separate HPLC procedure described by Tang et al. (31), with minor modifications, as follows: urine was incubated for 20 min with 25 mM NaOH at 40°C to convert AFMU quantitatively to AAMU. After neutralization with HCl, 0.5-ml aliquots of samples were applied to Bond Elut cartridges (Varian Associates). The analyte was then eluted with bicarbonate-buffer (pH 7.4) and applied to a TSK-20 size-exclusion HPLC column. The AAMU emerged in 15 min by use of a 0.1% acetic acid mobile phase and a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min. Monitoring was performed with a Waters 481 variable detector. The CV for AAMU was 8.4%.
These techniques resulted in sharp peaks and separation for the urinary xanthines and urates, AAMU, and the internal standard.
Quantitation of volume of ELF and concentrations of antibiotics in ELF and ACs. The amount of ELF recovered was calculated by the urea dilution method (28). The concentration of urea in serum was analyzed by the clinical laboratory at the University of California, San Francisco, by a coupled urease-glutamate dehydrogenase enzymatic method (30) modified by Boehringer Mannheim Corporation (Indianapolis, Ind.). Measurements were made at a fixed time interval that permitted automated analysis with a BM 747 analyzer (Boehringer Mannheim). The urea concentration in supernatant of the BAL fluid was measured by a modified enzymatic assay (BUN kit UV-66; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), as reported previously (5, 10, 11, 14, 15, 28). The assay is linear (R2 = 0.99) for concentrations of urea in BAL fluid from 0.047 to 0.750 mg/dl. The accuracies of the assay with low and high concentrations were 7.0 and -0.04%, respectively. Controls were included with every run, and if the result for the control was not within 10% of the known value, the assays for generation of the standard curve and with controls and specimens were repeated.
The volume of ELF in BAL fluid was derived from the following relationship: VELF = VBAL x (UreaBAL/UreaSER), where VELF is the volume of ELF sampled by BAL, VBAL is the volume of BAL fluid aspirated, UreaBAL is the concentration of urea in BAL fluid, and UreaSER is the concentration of urea in serum.
The concentration of antibiotic in the ELF was derived from the following relationship: ABXBAL x (VBAL/VELF), where ABXBAL is the measured concentration of antibiotic in BAL fluid.
The volume of ACs collected in the pellet suspension was determined from the cell count obtained with BAL fluid. Cells were counted in a hemocytometer, which has a lower detection limit of 1.0 x 106/liter. The calculated number of cells in 1.0 ml of the pellet suspension was determined to be equal to the number of cells per liter of BAL fluid/100. It has been noted, however, that centrifugation causes an average loss of 21% of the cells, so that the actual number of cells recovered may be lower than the number counted and the actual antibiotic concentration may be proportionately greater than the concentration calculated (33). Differential cell counting was performed after the specimen was spun in a cytocentrifuge. The volume of ACs in the pellet suspension was determined by using a mean macrophage cell volume of 2.42 µl/106 cells (2).
The concentration of antibiotic in alveolar cells was calculated from the following relationship: ABXPELLET/VAC, where ABXPELLET is the antibiotic concentration in the 1-ml cell suspension, and VAC is the volume of alveolar cells in the 1-ml cell suspension.
Statistical analysis. Database management was performed with a Sun 10 Sparcstation (Sun Microsystems, Milpitas, Calif.). Prophet software (version 5.0; Division of Research Resources, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md., and Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, Mass.) was used to compute descriptive statistics, and a different version of the software (Prophet, version 6.0, 1999; Abtech Corporation, Charlottesville, Va.) was used to perform linear regression, analysis of variance, and comparisons of means. Undetectable drug concentrations were recorded as zero and were included in calculations of means and standard deviations. Analysis of variance was used to assess the effects of gender and AIDS status on the subjects' physical characteristics, clinical laboratory values, drug dosage, drug concentrations, AC recovery, ELF recovery, and ratios of the concentration in ACs/concentration in plasma and concentration in ELF/concentration in plasma. The two-sample equal-variances t test (two-sided) was used to compare the weight-adjusted dosages in men and women, AC and ELF recovery, and drug concentrations in plasma, ACs, and ELF between women with AIDS who were smokers and women with AIDS who were nonsmokers. The equality of variances of the smoking and nonsmoking groups was calculated by the F test (Levene's test). The two-sample Mann-Whitney rank sum test (two-sided) was used to compare the ages and serum creatinine levels of subjects with and without AIDS and the CD4 counts in men and women with AIDS. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to evaluate the normality of the distributions of the data sets prior to comparison. A P value <0.05 was regarded as significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Cell recovery from BAL fluid. The number (mean ± SD) of ACs recovered from BAL fluid in the eight groups ranged from 8.92 x 107 ± 2.02 x 107 to 4.78 x 108 ± 2.6 x 108 cells/liter (Table 1). As expected, the majority of these cells in each of the eight groups were in the monocyte/macrophage class. The proportions of monocytes/macrophages, polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and lymphocytes in BAL fluid were not different among the subjects in the eight groups. Women with AIDS who were slow acetylators had a greater total number of cells in their BAL fluid than healthy men and healthy women or men with AIDS who were fast acetylators. This observation was largely due to the effect of smoking on cell recovery. Cell recovery was greater for smoking women with AIDS (5.35 x 108 ± 2.4 x 108 cells/liter) than nonsmoking women with AIDS (2.47 x 108 ± 1.2 x 108 cells/liter) (P = 0.004). The proportions of monocytes/macrophages, polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and lymphocytes in BAL fluid were not different when the proportions in smoking women with AIDS were compared to those in nonsmoking women with AIDS (P > 0.05 for all cell types).
ELF recovery from BAL fluid. The volume (mean ± SD) of ELF in the eight groups ranged from 0.58 ± 0.23 to 1.88 ± 0.1 ml (Table 1). Significantly greater volumes of ELF were recovered from women with AIDS who were slow acetylators than from healthy women who were fast or slow acetylators. No other differences in the volumes of ELF recovered were significant. Five of the 9 women with AIDS who were slow acetylators, none of the 10 healthy women who were slow acetylators, and none of the 10 healthy women who were fast acetylators were smokers. None of the men were smokers. These observations are consistent with previous reports that the volume of ELF recovered is increased for current smokers (7).
Plasma isoniazid concentrations. Gender and AIDS status had no effect on the concentrations of isoniazid in plasma at 1 or 4 h (Table 2). The concentrations in plasma at 1 h (mean ± SD) were unaffected by acetylator status (2.1 ± 1.6 µg/ml in the slow acetylator group versus 1.6 ± 1.6 µg/ml in the fast acetylator group) (P = 0.24).
The concentrations in plasma at 4 h were greater in the slow acetylators than in the fast acetylators (1.1 ± 0.8 versus 0.5 ± 0.6 µg/ml) (P = 0.0003). Despite this difference, no single concentration adequately separated the fast and slow acetylator groups. The concentrations in plasma at 1 and 4 h were fitted to several empirical models [ratio of concentration at 1 h to concentration at 4 h, concentration at 1 h - concentration at 4 h, (concentration at 1 h - concentration at 4 h)/concentration at 4 h, comparison of the slopes of the linear curve connecting the two points, and others]. None of these models allowed separation of the fast and slow acetylator groups on the basis of the concentrations in plasma at 1 and 4 h.
CD4 counts in the subjects with AIDS (n = 40) were not correlated with the concentrations of isoniazid in plasma at 1 h (R = -0.03; P = 0.9) or 4 h (R = -0.07; P = 0.65). As expected, the mean ± SD and median plasma isoniazid concentrations in all 80 subjects were significantly greater at 1 h (1.9 ± 1.6 and 1.45 µg/ml, respectively) than at 4 h (0.8 ± 0.8 µg/ml and 0.5 µg/ml, respectively) following administration of the last dose (P < 0 0.05). The weights of all subjects (n = 80) were not correlated with the plasma drug concentrations at 1 h (R = -0.17; P = 0.13) or 4 h (R = -0.14; P = 0.22). Although the plasma isoniazid concentrations were greater in women than men at 1 h (2.1 ± 1.8 versus 1.6 ± 1.3 µg/ml) and at 4 h (0.9 ± 0.8 versus 0.6 ± 0.7 µg/ml), the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05 for both time periods). When nonsmoking women with AIDS were compared to smoking women with AIDS, the plasma drug concentrations (mean ± SD) at 1 h (1.3 ± 1.0 versus 1.8 ± 1.2 µg/ml) and at 4 h (1.1 ± 1.0 versus 1.0 ± 1.0 µg/ml) were not significantly different (P > 0.05 for both time periods).
Five subjects had undetectable concentrations of isoniazid in the plasma specimen obtained at 1 h (Table 3). All five of the subjects were nonsmokers and fast acetylators, three of the subjects were men, and two of the subjects had AIDS. Of these five subjects, three also had undetectable concentrations in plasma at 4 h, three had undetectable concentrations in ELF, and three had undetectable concentrations in ACs. In one of the five subjects, isoniazid was undetectable in all three compartments. This subject was a healthy male volunteer who was a fast acetylator. The range of plasma isoniazid concentrations at 1 h in those subjects with measurable concentrations (n = 75) was 0.2 to 7.1 µg/ml, with a mean ± SD of 2.0 ± 1.6 µg/ml.
|
The concentrations of isoniazid in ELF were undetectable in 25 subjects. AIDS status, gender, and acetylator status were not associated with undetectable concentrations of isoniazid in ELF (P > 0.05). Twelve of the 25 subjects had AIDS (48%), 11(44%) were women, and 17 were fast acetylators (68%). The concentrations of isoniazid in plasma at 1 h (R = 0.15; P > 0.05) or 4 h (R = 0.21; P > 0.05) were not correlated with the concentrations of isoniazid in ELF.
Concentrations of isoniazid in ACs. For the entire group, the mean ± SD concentration of isoniazid in ACs was 2.5 ± 5.0 µg/ml and the ratio of the concentration in ACs to the concentration in plasma at 1 h was 2.1 ± 5.2. AC drug concentrations were not significantly different when the concentrations in smoking and nonsmoking women with AIDS were compared (P > 0.05). AC drug concentrations were significantly greater in healthy women who were fast acetylators than in healthy men who were fast acetylators and men with AIDS who were slow acetylators. The concentrations of isoniazid in ACs were undetectable in 31 subjects. Nineteen had AIDS (61%), 12 were women (39%), 16 were fast acetylators (52%), and 3 were smokers (10%). None of these factors were significantly associated with an undetectable isoniazid concentration in ACs (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). The concentrations of isoniazid in plasma at 1 h (R = 0.15; P > 0.05) or 4 h (R = -0.15; P > 0.05) were not correlated with isoniazid concentrations in ACs.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.1, 0.5, 2.5, and >2.5 µg/ml for susceptible, moderately susceptible, resistant, and very resistant, respectively (21). For clinical purposes, a concentration in serum of 3 to 5 µg/ml following the administration of an oral dose of 300 to 450 mg has been recommended as a target range for the treatment of tuberculosis (27). The values presented above are of importance in relationship to the findings from this study. In most of our subjects the plasma isoniazid concentrations at 1 and 4 h following oral drug administration observed by a witness were below those proposed for the treatment of patients with tuberculosis. For the entire study group, 12.5, 34.7, 60, and 82.7% of the subjects had peak concentrations plasma at 1 h of less than 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 µg/ml, respectively. These observations would agree with those of Kimerling et al. (22), who found inadequate concentrations of isoniazid in the sera of 68% of subjects who received directly observed therapy with isoniazid. Those investigators, however, used a twice-weekly dosing regimen and a target concentration in serum of 9 µg/ml, and thus, their results are not fully comparable to ours. Moreover, it is of concern that the peak concentrations in plasma at 1 h achieved in 10 (12.5%) subjects (5 with AIDS and 5 healthy volunteers) in this study would be at or below the recommended critical concentration. The clinical significance of this is unknown. Five, 25, and 31 of the 80 subjects had isoniazid concentrations that were undetectable in plasma, ELF, and ACs, respectively. Since administration of the first and fifth doses was directly observed and administration of the second, third, and fourth doses was documented in writing by the subjects, lack of compliance is not a likely explanation for these results. We believe that the data suggest poor and unpredictable gastrointestinal absorption of isoniazid. The optimum dose of isoniazid has not been determined; and the relationship among the MICs, drug concentrations, and outcomes requires further investigation.
Peak plasma drug concentrations were not affected by AIDS status, as we defined in this study, or acetylator status and were not greater in women, despite the greater weight-adjusted dose received by the women. Our failure to find reduced concentrations in plasma in these AIDS patients, as has been reported by others (18, 27; Berning et al., letter; Peloquin et al., letter), may be due to differences in the clinical status of the AIDS patients, the presence of gastrointestinal tract diseases, or differences in other physiological factors between the groups. Plasma drug concentrations were not correlated with body weight for men, women, or the group as a whole. Plasma drug concentrations at 1 h were significantly greater than the concentrations at 4 h, consistent with previous reports that have described the kinetics of isoniazid in plasma (25, 26). As expected, plasma drug concentrations at 4 h following administration of the last dose were significantly greater in slow acetylators than in fast acetylators. The level of protein binding of isoniazid is low (<10%) and is not of clinical or kinetic importance. The level of protein binding has not been included in reports of the pharmacokinetics of isoniazid (25, 26).
The concentrations of isoniazid in ACs were not affected by gender, AIDS status, or acetylator status. Our data indicate that isoniazid appears to diffuse passively into ACs, as has been reported previously for an in vitro model (20). For the group as a whole, intracellular drug concentrations were not significantly different from the peak concentrations in plasma. However, as was true of the concentrations in plasma, the intracellular concentrations in many of the subjects were low relative to the reported MICs of isoniazid for M. tuberculosis. In our study, the ACs of more than a third of the subjects had undetectable concentrations of isoniazid and the intracellular concentrations were less 1 µg/ml for more than half of the subjects. The optimum intracellular concentration of isoniazid in vivo is unknown and requires further study. Since M. tuberculosis causes intracellular infections, it is likely, but unproven, that some critical intracellular concentration is desirable for a favorable outcome.
The concentration of isoniazid in ELF was not significantly different from the concentrations in plasma at 1 h and the concentrations in ACs, suggesting that isoniazid, unlike pyrazinamide, diffuses passively into ELF (14). The clinical significance of antibiotic concentrations in ELF is unknown for tuberculosis and other bacterial and fungal pneumonias.
Outcome studies that relate MIC data, drug concentrations in serum, ACs, and ELF, rates of cure, failure, and relapse, and the rates of response of M. tuberculosis organisms have not been performed. In general, high inhibitory or killing ratios are viewed as favorable in the treatment of infectious diseases, and such ratios are probably important for the treatment of tuberculosis. This study suggests that in some patients who are treated for tuberculosis, plasma and intrapulmonary (ELF and AC) isoniazid concentrations are at or below the concentrations necessary to inhibit (MIC) or kill (MBC) the organism. This may provide, in part, a pharmacokinetic explanation for the rapid emergence of isoniazid-resistant organisms when isoniazid alone is used to treat tuberculosis.
We were also unable to demonstrate a difference in plasma, AC, or ELF drug concentrations in smoking versus nonsmoking women with AIDS. However, the sample sizes were small (10 smokers and 10 nonsmokers), and study of a larger group of subjects might detect such differences. The study was not designed to detect interactions among the many other drugs taken by our AIDS patients and isoniazid. However, when the concentrations in the various compartments of subjects with AIDS were compared to those in the healthy subjects, no differences in plasma, ELF, or AC isoniazid concentrations were detected, suggesting that if interactions were present the effect on isoniazid kinetics was minimal.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We acknowledge the assistance of Charles L. Daley, Tom Delahunty, and Farzaneh Raoufi for performing the assays and Eve Benton for manuscript preparation.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |