Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2002, p. 2393-2399, Vol. 46, No. 8
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.8.2393-2399.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan,1 Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 631102
Received 11 February 2002/ Returned for modification 18 March 2002/ Accepted 22 April 2002
|
|
|---|
7 to
50 µM. The most effective of these initial compounds, 2-phenylthio-indole, was used to identify six additional, structurally related compounds, which were tested for their inhibitory effects on enzyme activities and tachyzoite replication. Surprisingly, these compounds were competitive inhibitors of NTPase-I but noncompetitive inhibitors of NTPase-II. Modifications to the indole and phenol rings resulted in alterations of activity, thus providing insight into the structural features that are important for inhibition of T. gondii NTPases. |
|
|---|
The rapidly multiplying tachyzoite form of T. gondii has a potent nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase (NTPase; EC 3.6.1.3) that has a number of unusual properties (3). Treatment with a dithiol compound such as dithiothreitol (DTT) is essential to activate the enzyme in vitro. NTPase has two isoforms, termed NTPase isoform I (NTPase-I) and NTPase-II, which differ in their kinetic properties. While both enzymes hydrolyze a variety of nucleoside triphosphates, NTPase-I is only minimally active against diphosphate nucleosides such as ADP, while NTPase-II has roughly equal activities against tri- and diphosphate nucleosides (2). These enzymatic differences are presumably the result of a small number of differences that exist between their respective genes. These differences result in 15 amino acid changes among the 603 residues of the mature enzymes (2, 5). The gene encoding NTPase-II is found in all strains of T. gondii, while the gene encoding NTPase-I is confined to virulent strains (2, 5). Several properties of the T. gondii NTPase, such as substrate specificity and divalent cation requirements, are most similar to those of E (ecto)-type ATPases (12). E-type ATPases are insensitive to known inhibitors of P-, F-, and V-type ATPases; however, the T. gondii NTPases are sensitive to quercitin (50% inhibitory concentration [IC50],
100 µM), an inhibitor of P-type ATPases (T. Asai, unpublished data). Furthermore, DTT-dependent NTPases have not been found in other organisms except Neospora caninum, which is closely related to T. gondii (1). Although the physiological roles of the T. gondii NTPases have not been identified, the enzymes are released into the parasite-containing vacuole (14), where their function appears to be essential for tachyzoite replication within the host cell (11). These observations suggest that NTPase may be an excellent target for new chemotherapeutic strategies against toxoplasmosis. Therefore, we searched for inhibitors of NTPase activity by robotic screening of approximately 150,000 small-molecule compounds and tested whether the compounds identified also inhibited tachyzoite replication in vitro.
In this paper, we report on the chemical structures, anti-NTPase activities, and antiproliferative activities of these compounds.
|
|
|---|
Automated screening of compounds.
Chemicals for testing were obtained from the compound collection at Merck Research Laboratories (Rahway, N.J.) and were screened for inhibition of NTPases by automated robotic screening in a 96-well plate format. The compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and dispensed into individual wells of a 96-well plate for screening at an initial concentration of 50 µM. The 96-well plate assay contained 10 U (1 U = 1 nmol ATP/min) of the isozyme NTPase-II and ADP substrate at a concentration of 0.5 mM. Compounds that caused >50% inhibition were further diluted and tested to establish IC50s. The reaction mixture (0.1 ml) contained 50 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH 7.5), 6 mM magnesium acetate, 0.2 mM ATP (for NTPase-I) or 1 mM ATP (for NTPase-II), 5% DMSO, and 2 ng of NTPase-I (3.2 U) or NTPase-II (0.9 U). The reaction was started by addition of 5 mM DTT, and the mixture was then incubated at 37°C for 10 min and terminated by adding 50 µl of 0.1 M HCl. Inorganic orthophosphate derived from cleavage of ATP was detected colorimetrically with a Fiske & Subbarow reducer (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. IC50s were determined by graphing NTPase activity versus compound concentration, determining the best-fit curve by linear regression, and calculating the concentration that resulted in 50% inhibition of activity. Regression coefficients were
0.88 for all compounds except compound 9, which failed to inhibit the enzymes in a dose-dependent manner.
To determine the inhibition profile, the enzymes were incubated with different concentrations of substrate (0.1 to 1 mM) in the presence or absence of a standard amount of each inhibitor (5 µM), and the mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 10 min. DTT was then added to a concentration of 5 mM to activate the enzyme. Alternatively, mixtures containing substrate, inhibitors, and DTT were incubated for 10 min at 37°C. The reaction was started by adding the enzyme and was continued for 10 min at 37°C. Inhibitory constants (Ki) were calculated, and the values were plotted as double-reciprocal Lineweaver-Burk plots with SigmaPlot 2000 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Ill.).
Measurement of hexokinase activity. The standard reaction mixture consisted of 0.5 mM glucose, 2 mM ATP, 7 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM NADP+, 0.005 U of Toxoplasma recombinant hexokinase (T. Saito et al., unpublished data), 0.2 U of yeast glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (type VII; Sigma), and 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) in a volume of 1 ml. NADPH formation by dehydrogenation of glucose-6-phosphate was monitored at 340 nm with a UV-1600 spectrophotometer with a TCC-240A temperature-controlled cell holder unit (Schimazu Co., Kyoto, Japan).
Inhibition of in vitro parasite replication. HFF monolayers grown in 96-well plates were inoculated with 103 tachyzoites of the 2F clone, which expresses ß-galactosidase. The compounds were dissolved in DMSO and diluted in DMEM to a final concentration of 1% DMSO. Cultures infected four times were inoculated with either DMSO as a control or diluted compounds, and the mixtures were incubated for 48 h at 37°C. The monolayers were centrifuged at 2,000 xg for 10 min, the culture supernatants were discarded, and the monolayer and parasites were lysed in phosphate-buffered saline containing 1% Triton X-100. ß-Galactosidase activity was quantified with the substrate chlorophenol red ß-D-galactopyranoside as described previously (9). Tachyzoite numbers were estimated from a standard curve that related cell numbers to enzyme activity. IC50s were determined by plotting the resulting data, fitting a best-fit curve by linear regression, and calculating the concentration that resulted in 50% inhibition. Values are reported as the means ± standard deviations for three experiments.
|
|
|---|
50 µM (Table 1). These compounds did not influence the activation of NTPases by DTT, and their inhibitory properties were not dependent on the presence of 5% DMSO in the reaction mixture (data not shown). At the concentrations tested, these five compounds did not cause a loss of integrity of the HFF monolayer, based on staining for trypan blue exclusion (
5% of cells were positively stained).
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Chemical structures of five species of compounds that where initially identified on the basis of inhibition of NTPase-II activity. The compounds are 2-{2-[2-(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)ethoxy]ethoxy}acetic acid (compound 1), 9-hydroxy-10-(pentachlorophenoxy)stearic acid (compound 2), urosolic acid (compound 3), 1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxamide, 5-amino-1-({3,5-dichloro-4-[tricyclo(3.3.1.13,7)dec-1-ylcarbony]phenyl}methyl) (compound 4), and 2-phenylthio-indole (compound 5).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Activities of compounds identified by random screening for inhibition of NTPases
|
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Chemical structures of 2-phenylthio-indole and derivatives. The compounds are 2-phenylthio-indole (compound 5), 2-[(3-nitrophenyl)thio]-1H-indole (compound 6), 2-(2-naphthalenylthio)-1H-indole (compound 7), 2-[(4-methoxyphenyl)thio]-1H-indole (compound 8), 3-phenylsulfenyl indole (compound 9), 2-(1-naphthalenylthio)-1H-indole (compound 10), 2-(4-nitrophenylthio) indole (compound 11), and 3-metylthio-2-(4-nitrophenylthio) indole (compound 12)
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Activities of indole-containing compounds against NTPase isoforms and T. gondii replication
|
Analysis of the inhibition profiles of the compounds listed in Table 2 revealed a surprising difference between the two enzymes. Inhibition of NTPase-II activity required preincubation with the enzyme prior to activation, while inhibition of NTPase-I activity did not. Additionally, double-reciprocal plots of the inhibition profiles with different substrate concentrations revealed that the inhibition of NTPase-II activity resulted in a change in Vmax but not a change in Km, while inhibition of NTPase-I activity resulted in a change in Km but not a change in Vmax (shown in Fig. 3 for compound 5).
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Double-reciprocal Lineweaver-Burk plots of the activities of NTPase-I (A) and NTPase-II (B). Activities were determined with various substrate concentrations in the absence (none) or presence (5 µM compound 5) of the inhibitor. The inhibition profile for NTPase-I activity is consistent with a noncompetitive mechanism, while the inhibition profile for NTPase-I activity is consistent with a competitive mechanism.
|
|
|
|---|
The levels of inhibition of NTPase-I and NTPase-II activities were highly similar for all compounds except compound 2. NTPase-I activity was 20 times more sensitive to compound 2 than NTPase-II activity, suggesting that the chemical structure of compound 2 may mimic substrate recognition differences between NTPase-I and NTPase-II. The activity of NTPase-I is unusual due to its high specific activity for triphosphate nucleosides, and in this regard it behaves less like a classical apyrase than NTPase-II does. Analysis of chimeric constructs between the two isoforms of the T. gondii NTPases implicates a region in the C terminus in the mediation of substrate binding (11). However, the remaining residues involved in substrate binding have not been identified. One surprising finding is that the inhibition profiles of the two enzymes were fundamentally different. While the inhibition of NTPase-I activity was competitive, a noncompetitive profile was observed for NTPase-II activity. This result suggests that while the inhibitors bind competitively with the substrate to NTPase-I, they bind at another site to NTPase-II and indirectly influence its activity. Consequently, the differences in the primary sequences among these enzymes may be involved in molecular interactions other than substrate binding which indirectly influence activity.
Among the five classes of inhibitory compounds identified by random screening, chlorobenzene is a common structure in three of the compounds (compounds 1, 2, and 4). However, as the chlorobenzene of compound 4 is present in an internal position of the structure, the triazole-4-carboxamide group that is externally exposed may be more important for the inhibitory effect of compound 4.
Ursolic acid (compound 3) has previously been identified as an inhibitor of several enzymes, including adenosine deaminase, arachidonate lipoxygenase, aromatase, cyclooxygenase, DNA ligase I, elastase, protein kinases A and C, and RNA-directed DNA polymerase (15). Moreover, ursolic acid has been found to have biological activities that include anti-inflammatory, hepatoprotective, immunomodulatory, and anti-tumor cell proliferative effects (10). The precise mechanisms by which ursolic acid inhibits the activities of these enzyme and exerts biological functions are unknown at present (10). The enzyme reaction of NTPase is quite simple compared to those of the other enzymes listed above; therefore, kinetic studies of the inhibitory effect of ursolic acid on NTPase activity may provide useful information on the mechanism of action.
One of the most effective inhibitors found by random screening was 2-phenylthio- indole (compound 5), and several derivatives of this compound were tested to explore the relationship between structure and activity. Modifications of the indole and phenol rings influenced the effectiveness of these compounds. For example, addition of a nitro group to the C-4 position of the phenol ring or addition of oxygen to the thiol group or to the C-4 position of the phenol ring reduced the level of activity. Addition of a nitro group to the C-3 position of the phenol ring preserved the IC50 for the enzyme in vitro, yet this compound was less effective in blocking parasite replication. This result is not likely to be due simply to reduced levels of entry into the cell, owing to an increased polarity, as compound 11, which has a similar nitro group in a different position, retained its antiparasitic activity.
Substitution of a naphthlene group for the phenol increased the level of activity when it was linked as 2-(1-naphthalenylthio), and this was reflected by greater inhibition of enzyme activities and parasite growth. Somewhat surprisingly, the addition of this group linked as 2-(2-naphthalenylthio) slightly decreased the levels of activity against the enzymes yet resulted in enhanced activity against parasite growth. While the results obtained with these compounds provide some insight into the regions of the molecule important for activity, precise analysis of structure-activity relationships requires additional compounds that are not available in our collection.
The T. gondii NTPases belong to the GDA1/CD39 (Pfam 01150) conserved protein family of ecto ATPases with apyrase activities. Like the other members of this group, the NTPase enzymes contain a rudimentary ATP binding site in the N-terminal portion of the enzyme which is thought to be important in the binding of the ß-phosphate group of the substrate (2). The original member of this family, the GDA1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is found in the Golgi complex and participates in O- and N-linked glycosylation, while other members of this family are found in plants (in the genera Pisum, Arabidopsis, Solanum, and Glycine), and mammals (in the genera Rattus, Mus, and Homo), where they serve diverse roles. At present no structural data are available for any of the enzymes in this group, and elucidation of such a structure for the NTPase would aid in the interpretation of the differences in the levels of inhibition by the compounds studied here.
The T. gondii NTPases have several features that enhance their potential as therapeutic targets, including (i) the fact that they are unique to the parasite and are not found in the host and (ii) the fact that the enzyme activity appears to be essential for proliferation of the parasite. The experiments reported here indicate that there is a good correlation between the abilities of compounds to inhibit enzyme activity and their abilities to inhibit tachyzoite cell replication, suggesting that the basis of the antiproliferative effect is due to inhibition of NTPase. This conclusion is consistent with those from a previous report that indicated that NTPases play an important role in intracellular replication of the parasite, based on antisense interruption of expression (11). The compounds identified here have modest IC50s in the low micromolar range. While we did not detect any nonspecific inhibition against an unrelated ATPase (hexokinase), we cannot completely rule out the possibility that there are targets in addition to the NTPases within the parasite that are susceptible to these compounds. Nonetheless, these compounds provide useful leads for investigation of the roles of the NTPases in the biology of T. gondii. They may also provide useful leads for further chemical modifications designed to improve their antiparasitic activities while reducing their potential toxicities. The identification of new anti-T. gondii drugs remains an important priority for the patient populations that remain at risk of this opportunistic infection.
We are grateful to Dennis Schmatz and Marc Feiglin for assistance in conducting the screens with the inhibitors and Helen Profous-Juchelka for assistance with obtaining compounds (Merck Research Laboratories, Inc.).
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»