Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2002, p. 2462-2469, Vol. 46, No. 8
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.8.2462-2469.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control, and Employee Health,2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas1
Received 20 September 2001/ Returned for modification 11 December 2001/ Accepted 26 April 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Relatively little is known about the molecular mechanisms of CAS resistance in fungi. In the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, genetic studies have shown that glucan synthase is composed of at least two subunits: a putative catalytic subunit encoded by two related genes, FKS1 and FKS2, and a regulatory subunit, a GTP-bound protein encoded by RHO1 (12). Mutations in FKS1, FKS2, or RHO1 genes have been associated with altered susceptibility to glucan synthase inhibitors (12). However, a direct demonstration of the role of gene overexpression in CAS resistance has been lacking.
To that end, we looked for S. cerevisiae genes that would confer resistance to CAS when overexpressed. As a screening strategy, we used the regulated system of GAL1 cDNA overexpression in S. cerevisiae (11). More specifically, the GAL1 promoter is repressed when S. cerevisiae utilizes glucose as a carbon source and is derepressed, leading to overexpression, when growth is shifted to galactose as a sole carbon source (11). We identified that SBE2, a novel gene involved in cell wall formation, results in CAS resistance when overexpressed in S. cerevisiae.
(This work was presented in part at the 41st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, Ill., 16 to 19 December 2001.)
|
|
|---|
Yeast transformation and screening for CAS-resistant colonies. The S. cerevisiae strain 10560-14C was transformed with a URA3-based cDNA library under the control of the GAL1 promoter cloned into the centromeric plasmid pRS 316 (15), and Ura+ transformants were selected in glucose SC minus uracil plates. The transformants were then pooled and spread (concentration, approximately 100 colonies/plate) to galactose SC minus uracil CAS (1 µg/ml) plates. CAS-resistant colonies were identified after 48 h of incubation at 30°C. Previous pilot experiments determined that the 10560-14C strain transformed by the URA3 centromeric plasmid pRS 316 (control) fails to grow on galactose SC minus uracil CAS (1 µg/ml) plates. Resistant candidates were retested by streaking them on to glucose SC minus uracil CAS (1 µg/ml) plates and galactose SC minus uracil CAS (1 µg/ml) plates. True CAS-resistant colonies were plasmid mediated (CAS sensitive and CAS resistant on glucose and galactose medium, respectively).
CAS sensitivity testing. Drug sensitivity tests were performed in the Ura+ transformants of the 10560-14C strain and in the Y270, Y1942, Y1943, and Y1944 strains (kindly provided by M Snyder, Yale University [18]). Four different methods were performed to measure sensitivity to CAS. Three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate at different time points, were performed per each susceptibility assay. For the first assay, the growth of each yeast strain streaked out to form single colonies was examined (after an incubation for 48 h at 30°C) on galactose SC minus uracil and glucose SC minus uracil agar plates containing various concentrations of CAS. Second, we used a disk diffusion assay, in which yeast growth was examined by plating approximately 105 yeast cells in late logarithmic growth phase on galactose SC minus uracil and glucose SC minus uracil agar plates, respectively. CAS (or the other inhibitors) was placed on a 0.25-in.-diameter paper disk (Schleicher and Schuell, Keene, N.H.) in a final volume of 5 µl. The radius of the zone of growth inhibition was measured after 48 h of growth at 30°C. Third, we measured the MIC of CAS for the Ura+ transformant CAS-resistant candidate strains recovered from our screen by using the broth microdilution method (NCCLS document M27-A [16]). In order to maintain the selection and to evaluate the relationship between CAS resistance and the carbon source (glucose versus galactose), the selective liquid media glucose SC minus uracil and galactose SC minus uracil were used, instead of the standard RPMI 1640. Both the control and the SBE2 cDNA-containing strains (each taken from a single colony grown on glucose SC minus uracil plates) were pregrown in both glucose SC minus uracil and galactose SC minus uracil liquid media. A standardized suspension of yeast cells (1 x 106 to 5 x 106) was inoculated onto glucose SC minus uracil CAS (concentrations from 0.06 to 32 µg/ml) and galactose SC minus uracil CAS (concentrations from 0.06 to 32 µg/ml) in 96-well microtiter plates. The MIC was determined after 48 h of growth at 30°C. Fourth, we assayed the growth kinetics of the control and the SBE2cDNA-containing strain, each taken from a single colony grown on glucose SC minus uracil plates and pregrown (overnight incubation at 30°C with constant shaking) in both glucose SC minus uracil and galactose SC minus uracil liquid media. Cells were diluted to a starting inoculum of 3 x 106 (optical density [OD] = 0.01) and inoculated onto 25 ml of liquid glucose SC minus uracil with or without CAS (concentration of 1.0 µg/ml) and 25 ml of liquid galactose SC minus uracil with or without CAS (concentration of 1.0 µg/ml). Cultures were grown at 30°C with constant shaking, and the OD was measured at 2-, 4-, 6-, 8-, 10-, and 24-h intervals.
Microscopy. (i) Differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy. Yeast cells were grown for 48 h on galactose SC minus uracil and glucose SC minus uracil agar plates in the presence or absence of CAS (0.25 µg/ml). Images were collected using a Nikon Microphot-SA microscope and a Hamamatsu model C2400 camera and transferred to Adobe Photoshop (version 4.0). Several fields containing 500 to 1,000 cells were examined and photographed.
(ii) Electron microscopy. Yeast cells were grown for 48 h on galactose SC minus uracil and glucose SC minus uracil agar plates in the presence or absence of CAS (0.5 µg/ml). Preparation of samples for transmission electron microscopy was carried out as previously described (9). Yeast cells were fixed by the addition of glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, Pa.) to growth medium to a final concentration of 5%. After incubation for 3 h at room temperature, cells were concentrated by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 10 min at room temperature and then washed two times with 0.9% NaCl. Samples were suspended in 4% KMnO4 in 0.1 M Na-cacodylate, pH 7.4 (Electron Microscopy Sciences) and incubated at 4°C for 1 h. After two washes with 0.9% NaCl, samples were suspended in 2% uranyl acetate and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Samples were washed three times, dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol solutions, infiltrated with propylene oxide for 10 min, and then embedded in Epon-812 (Tousimis Research Co., Rockville, Md.). Ultra thin sections were stained for 5 min with 1% lead citrate before viewing with a transmission electron microscope model JEM-1010 (JEOL USA, Peabody, Mass.). Several fields containing 50 to 100 cells were examined, and representative portions were recorded. The cells exhibiting visible defects such as irregularities and aberrations in the electron-dense outer layer of the cell wall or thickening or deformation of the lighter middle layer of the cell wall were scored as having abnormal changes in cell wall. Approximately 500 cells were viewed per result point.
In vitro glucan synthase activity.
Crude membrane fractions were prepared according to previously described methods (5). Briefly, standardized inocula (106 cells) of yeast taken from a single colony were grown in 250 ml of liquid galactose SC minus uracil and glucose SC minus uracil media at 30°C until cultures reached an OD of 1.5. The cells were collected by centrifugation at 5,000 x g for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant was decanted, and cells were washed twice with 25 ml of breakage buffer (0.1 M HEPES [pH 7], 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM dithiothreitol). Twenty-five grams of acid-washed glass beads (diameter, 0.2 µm; Sigma) were added, and the cell suspension was shaken vigorously for 3 to 5 min until 80% breakage was achieved. Cellular debris was then spun down at 5,000 x g for 5 min. The supernatant from the low-speed spin was spun at 50,000 x g for 1 h at 4°C to obtain a crude membrane pellet. The crude membrane pellet was suspended in 2.5 ml of breakage buffer plus 25% glycerol. Using a homogenizer (no. 77272 [2 ml]; Pyrex, Birmingham, England), membranes were homogenized using 10 strokes. Protein concentration was determined using the Bradford assay. A concentration of 1 to 10 mg/ml was typically obtained. The membranes were then frozen in 100-µl aliquots in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. The whole procedure was conducted at 4°C in a cold room. To measure 1,3-ß-D-glucan synthase activity, we modified the procedure previously reported by Douglas et al. (5). We used 80 µl of reaction mixture and 25 µg (20 µl) of membrane per reaction. The reaction mixture consisted of 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7), 1 mM EDTA, 60 mM NaCl, 25 mM NaF, 0.4 mM dithiothreitol, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.2% (wt/vol) bovine serum albumin, 40 U of
-amylase, 3 µM GTP-
-S, UPD-D-[6-3H]glucose (80,000 dpm/nmol), and 0.4 mM UPD-glucose. We exposed the membranes to six different concentrations of CAS: 0.0, 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, and 1 µg/ml. The reactions were performed at room temperature for 1 h, during which the reaction was linear. The reactions were agitated every 15 min. After 1 h, each reaction was terminated with the addition of 80 µl of ice-cold 20% trichloroacetic acid. The reaction was then filtered through glass fiber filters (#31 grade; Schleicher and Schuell), washed with distilled water and dried for 1 h. Each filter was then placed in a scintillation tube with 4 ml of aquasol-2 (universal LSC cocktail Dupont). The radioactivity was determined using an LS 6500 scintillation counter (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, Calif.). Enzyme activity was determined in triplicate for three independent assays. Specific activity was expressed as nanomoles of radiolabeled product per hour per mg of protein.
Statistical analysis. Data comprised three independent experiments with three replicates within each experiment. All comparisons were considered statistically significant for P values of 0.05 or less. No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons. Statistical analyses were made using the SAS software system.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. MICs of CASa
|
![]() View larger version (39K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. GAL1-SBE2 cDNA confers galactose-dependent resistance to CAS. (A) Growth inhibition responses of the control 10560-14C strain transformed by the GAL1 URA3 centromeric plasmid pRS 316 (control-right) and the same vector containing the SBE2 cDNA (left) on glucose and galactose SC minus uracil agar plates in the presence or absence of CAS. (B) Disk diffusion assays of the 10560-14C strain transformed by the GAL1 URA3 centromeric plasmid pRS 316 (top panels) and the same vector containing the SBE2 cDNA (bottom panels) on glucose and galactose SC minus uracil agar plates. The disks contained 5 µg of CAS. (C) Growth curves of the 10560-14C strain transformed by the GAL1 URA3 centromeric plasmid pRS 316 (control) and the same vector containing the SBE2 cDNA on glucose and galactose SC minus uracil agar liquid medium in the presence or absence of CAS (1 µg/ml).
|
Galactose-dependent overexpression of SBE2 attenuates the abnormal cell wall ultrastructure and growth defects caused by CAS. We analyzed by DIC microscopy the morphology of both the 10560-14C strain transformed by the GAL1 URA3 vector (control) and the same strain transformed by the same vector containing the GAL1 SBE2 cDNA growing on agar plates for 48 h in the following media: glucose SC minus uracil, galactose SC minus uracil, glucose SC minus uracil CAS (0.25 µg/ml), and galactose SC minus uracil CAS (0.25 µg/ml). We found that only the strain containing the GAL1 SBE2 cDNA, and only when grown in galactose, had an attenuation of the CAS-induced cell wall abnormalities (Fig. 2).
![]() View larger version (80K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Galactose-dependent expression of SBE2 cDNA reduces cellular swelling and vacuolization in the presence of CAS. Control (left) and GAL1-SBE2 (right) S. cerevisiae strains were grown on galactose agar plates for 48 h at 30°C in the absence (top) or presence (bottom) of CAS. DIC microscopy and image analysis were performed as described in Materials and Methods.
|
![]() View larger version (94K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Galactose-dependent expression of SBE2 cDNA reduces CAS-induced cell wall damage. Control (left) and GAL1-SBE2 (right) S. cerevisiae strains were grown on galactose (top panel) and glucose (lower panel) minimal medium agar plates for 48 h at 30°C in the absence (top) or presence (bottom) of CAS. Transmission electron microscopy was performed as described in Materials and Methods.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Overexpression of SBE2 attenuates the cell wall abnormalities that are induced by CASa
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Galactose-dependent expression of SBE2 cDNA increases the baseline glucan synthase activity and decreases its degree of inhibition by CAS. Control and GAL1-SBE2 S. cerevisiae strains were grown on glucose (A) and galactose (B) SC minus uracil liquid media. Membrane fractions were harvested, different concentrations of CAS were added, and glucan synthase activity was measured as described in Materials and Methods. The mean and standard deviation (error bars) of the three experiments, after first averaging the replicates in each experiment, are plotted. The statistical significance of the measurements of the control strain versus the SBE2-overexpressing strain is shown. Comparisons were performed, at each concentration separately, using two-sample t tests.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Specificity of resistance to CAS in a strain overexpressing GAL1 SBE2
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Specificity of sensitivity to caspofungin in the SBE deletion mutants
|
|
|
|---|
On the other hand, the strain overexpressing the SBE2 cDNA grew slower than the control in the presence of galactose (Fig. 1C). Therefore, the relative CAS resistance of that strain could be attributed to the fact that CAS acts more effectively against rapidly growing cells (14; Douglas et al, 40th ICAAC) and would therefore be relatively less effective against this slow-growing strain. However, if Sbe2p were providing protection to CAS only by slowing growth in general, one would probably have recovered several different cDNAs in our screen, since overexpression of many genes would be expected to result in slowed growth. In contrast, we found only two genes, with the SBE2 being found in the vast majority (15 of 16) of isolates.
SBE2 has been described in S. cerevisiae to encode a Golgi protein involved in the transport of cell wall components (18). SBE2 is 43% similar to the highly related gene SBE22 (18). The sbe2 sbe22 double mutant exhibits severe cell wall and polarity defects (18), implying that these two genes have overlapping function, possibly as a result of gene duplication. However, we did not find SBE22 in our screen. Interestingly, SBE2 but not SBE22 was found to suppress, when overexpressed in high copy number, the lethality of the chs5 spa2 mutant (18). This could suggest a degree of divergence of their structural features, physiologic role, and regulation. For example, the potential coiled-coil region (amino acids 510 to560) is conserved in Sbe2p but not Sbe22p (18).
Even though there is clear evidence that SBE2 is involved in maintaining cell wall integrity, the exact mechanism of protection from the glucan synthase inhibitors such as CAS is unclear. In view of the fact that we found that both baseline activity and the degree of inhibition of glucan synthase were higher in the strain overexpressing Sbe2p, it is possible that the aforementioned protein might be involved in the export or assembly of some regulatory subunits of the glucan synthase enzyme complex. Alternatively, a nonspecific protective mechanism, independent of the glucan synthasesuch as the increased transport of other cell wall constituents compensating for impairment of cell wall synthesis and assembly caused by CASmay be responsible for the resistance to CAS. In view of the recent insight regarding the regulation by sphingolipid biosynthetic pathway of FKS activity in S. cerevisiae (1) and of cell wall formation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (6), it is tempting to speculate that the secretory machinery (of which Sbe2p is a part) that transports cell wall components could somehow be involved in those interactions. Further work that will examine the genetic interactions between sbe2 and those mutants known to affect cell wall biosynthesis as well as study of the transcriptional regulation of SBE2 in the presence or absence of CAS will further clarify the role of this gene in echinocandin resistance in yeast.
Finally, we found that the overexpression of Sbe2p appears to result in a paradoxical relative sensitivity to azoles. If Sbe2p is increasing the shuttling of vesicles containing cell wall membrane-related proteins, there may be subtle differences in cell membrane composition, leading to increased sensitivity to azoles. A feedback regulation of wall biosynthesis and remodeling following azole-induced ergosterol depleting conditions is suggested in S. cerevisiae and C. albicans (3, 4, 10)
The implications of our finding could have significant clinical relevance. This transport pathway may provide insight into the tolerance or lack of sensitivity to CAS seen in some pathogenic fungi (e.g., Cryptococcus and molds) and it needs to be further explored for diagnosis and therapy. Future work is needed to evaluate whether a constitutive hyperactivity of this novel pathway could explain the fundamental differences between yeasts and molds in regards to the type and degree of activity of echinocandins.
This work was supported by the Cancer Center (Core) grant CA16672 from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center and an educational grant from Merck and Company, Inc., to D.P.K.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»