This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okamoto, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nishino, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okamoto, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nishino, T.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2002, p. 2696-2699, Vol. 46, No. 8
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.8.2696-2699.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Extrusion of Penem Antibiotics by Multicomponent Efflux Systems MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexXY-OprM of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Kiyomi Okamoto, Naomasa Gotoh,* and Takeshi Nishino

Department of Microbiology, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Yamashina, Kyoto 607-8414, Japan

Received 30 October 2001/ Returned for modification 26 February 2002/ Accepted 1 May 2002


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
The high intrinsic penem resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is due to the interplay among the outer membrane barrier, the active efflux system MexAB-OprM, and AmpC ß-lactamase. We studied the roles of two other efflux systems, MexCD-OprJ and MexXY-OprM, in penem resistance by overexpressing each system in an AmpC- and MexAB-OprM-deficient background and found that MexAB-OprM is the most important among the three efflux systems for extrusion of penems from the cell interior.


arrow
TEXT
 
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a clinically significant pathogen exhibiting intrinsic and acquired resistance to various antimicrobial agents. This resistance is attributable to the limited permeability of the outer membrane and the extrusion of a wide variety of antibiotics from the cell interior by a tripartite multidrug efflux system, which is composed of membrane fusion protein-type periplasmic, resistance-nodulation-cell division-type inner-membrane, and outer-membrane efflux proteins (10). Among these efflux systems, MexAB-OprM (5, 9, 19) and MexXY-OprM (1, 11, 14) contribute to both intrinsic resistance and acquired resistance, while MexCD-OprJ (20) and MexEF-OprN (8) contribute only to acquired resistance in P. aeruginosa. Recently, Masuda et al. (12) reported the substrate specificities of MexAB-OprM, MexXY-OprM, and MexCD-OprJ. Although most antimicrobial agents are substrates of all three efflux systems, these systems have slight but significant differences in substrate specificities to ß-lactams. MexAB-OprM extrudes the broadest variety of ß-lactams, including penicillins, cephems, and meropenem-type carbapenems. MexXY-OprM and MexCD-OprJ extrude most penicillins but not carbenicillin, sulbenicillin, various cephems, and many carbapenems. Penem antibiotics display potent activities against a variety of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria but not against P. aeruginosa (2, 3, 4, 13, 15, 16, 17, 21, 24). Studies with mutants that overproduce or lack MexAB-OprM demonstrated that this efflux system extrudes penem antibiotics (18). However, it is unclear whether MexXY-OprM and MexCD-OprJ extrude penem antibiotics.

We compared the susceptibilities of a series of previously described isogenic AmpC-lacking mutants, each of which constitutively overexpressed an individual efflux pump (12, 18) (Table 1). We used AmpC-lacking P. aeruginosa mutants because the presence of chromosomal AmpC ß-lactamase makes it difficult to interpret data on the MICs of ß-lactams, including penems, due to the interplay between ß-lactamase and the efflux system(s). The MICs of various penems, norfloxacin, and tetracycline for the mutants were determined by the twofold agar dilution method (23) with L agar with an inoculum of 104 cells. These results are shown in Table 2. Although the susceptibilities of the mutant KG5002, which lacked MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexXY-OprM, to all penems tested were reduced by the overexpression of MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, or MexXY-OprM, as were those to norfloxacin and tetracycline, the degree of reduction resulting from the overexpression of MexAB-OprM (128- to 4,096-fold reduction compared to the results for KG5002) was remarkably higher than that resulting from the overexpression of MexCD-OprJ (2- to 64-fold reduction compared to the results for KG5002) or MexXY-OprM (4- to 16-fold reduction compared to the results for KG5002). These results suggest that all of the efflux systems tested extrude penems, that MexAB-OprM pumps out penems more effectively than it pumps out norfloxacin and tetracycline, and that the extrusion potency of MexAB-OprM for penems is higher than those of MexCD-OprJ and MexXY-OprM.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Relevant bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Susceptibilities of isogenic mutants of P. aeruginosa PAO to penems and other antimicrobial agents

Four faropenem- and ritipenem-resistant mutants were spontaneously isolated from KG2504 (18), which has all three efflux system operons, on L agar (1.0% [wt/vol] tryptone, 0.5% [wt/vol] yeast extract, 0.5% [wt/vol] NaCl, and 1.5% [wt/vol] agar) plates containing twice the MIC of faropenem or ritipenem, respectively, per milliliter for these strains, and they were examined for their susceptibilities to penems, norfloxacin, and tetracycline and for the expression of efflux systems by immunoblot assay with antibodies (7) against a component of MexAB-OprM, antibodies (6) against a component of MexCD-OprJ, the antibody (11) against the periplasmic component, MexX, of MexXY-OprM, and the antibody (8) against the outer membrane component, OprN, of MexEF-OprN. All of the tested mutants showed identical resistance profiles and expression of efflux systems, and the resistance profiles and expression in KG2504F1, one of the isolated mutants, are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 1, respectively. KG2504F1 exhibited a resistance profile nearly identical to that of the strain overexpressing MexAB-OprM, KG5004 (Table 2). Immunoblot analysis of KG2504F1 revealed overexpression of MexA, MexB (data not shown), and OprM and undetectable expression of MexC, MexD (data not shown), OprJ, MexX, and OprN (data not shown) (Fig. 1, lane 2), indicating that it overexpressed only MexAB-OprM among the tested efflux systems. Similarly, four faropenem- and ritipenem-resistant mutants isolated in the same manner from the MexAB-deficient mutant, KG2505, showed identical phenotypes. The resistance profiles and expression in KG2505F1, one of the isolated mutants, are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 1, respectively. KG2505F1 showed a resistance profile nearly identical to that of the MexCD-OprJ hyperexpression strain, KG5008 (Table 2). Immunoblot analysis of KG2505F1 revealed overexpression of MexC, MexD (data not shown), and OprJ, very slight expression of OprM, and undetectable expression of MexA, MexB (data not shown), MexX, and OprN (data not shown) (Fig. 1, lane 4), indicating that it overexpressed only MexCD-OprJ among the tested efflux systems. These results show that MexAB-OprM is more effective in extruding penems than are the other tested efflux systems.



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Detection of MexA, OprM, MexX, MexC, and OprJ by immunoblot analysis with the appropriate antibodies. Lane 1, KG2504; lane 2, KG2504F1; lane 3, KG2505; lane 4, KG2505F1; lane 5, KG2505F1{Delta}D; lane 6, positive controls (KG5004 for MexA and OprM, KG5006 for MexX, and KG5008 for MexC and OprJ).

MexXY expression, which is suppressed in wild-type strains such as PAO1 grown in ordinary nutrient media, is transiently derepressed from its suppression by the addition of antimicrobial agents such as tetracycline, erythromycin, and gentamicin (1, 11; T. Murata and N. Gotoh, unpublished data). To investigate whether penems induce MexXY expression, cells of mutants KG2504, KG2504F1, KG2505, and KG2505F1 were incubated and analyzed by immunoblot analysis as described previously (11). MexXY expression was not detected in cells that had been incubated with various concentrations (one-fourth the MIC to the MIC) of faropenem and ritipenem (data not shown). Thus, it was confirmed that MexXY has a trivial contribution to penem resistance, which is in accordance with the low resistance in cells overexpressing MexXY-OprM (Table 2).

Sequence data from the P. aeruginosa genome project have led researchers to predict the existence of at least six unidentified species of MexAB-OprM homologous resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) family systems, in addition to the four efflux systems of P. aeruginosa PAO1 previously identified (22). Outer-membrane efflux proteins such as OprM and OprJ cooperatively function not only with native inner-membrane complexes such as MexAB and MexCD, respectively, but also with non-native inner-membrane complexes such as MexAB (for OprJ) (25), MexCD (for OprM) (6), and MexXY (for OprM) (11) as chimeric systems, indicating that the penem resistance observed in this study may be affected by the functional association of OprM and OprJ expressed in the tested strains with unknown efflux proteins. In order to investigate this possibility, we constructed a mexD::{Omega}Sm mutant, KG2505F1{Delta}D, from KG2505F1 by homologous recombination using the pKMJ075 plasmid carrying mexD::{Omega}Sm as described previously (6) and transformed KG5002 with an OprM expression plasmid, pKMM128 (6). Undetectable expression of MexD and overexpression of OprM, respectively, were confirmed in the two mutants by immunoblot analysis as described above (data not shown). The susceptibility of KG5002 to penems, norfloxacin, and tetracycline was not affected by the overexpression of OprM (data not shown). However, upon deletion of MexD, the susceptibilities of KG2505F1 to all penems tested increased to the same levels as those of KG5002, which lacks MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexXY-OprM (Table 2), in spite of the low level of production of OprM in KG2505F1{Delta}D (Fig. 1, lane 5). This suggests that although we do not know whether an efflux system other than MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexXY-OprM that is encoded on the P. aeruginosa chromosome contributes to penem resistance, no efflux system that functions cooperatively with OprM and OprJ is expressed. In contrast, loss of MexD did not increase the susceptibilities of KG2505F1 to tetracycline and norfloxacin to the levels of those of KG5002, although both of these agents are substrates for MexCD-OprJ (Table 2). This was probably due not to expression of an unknown efflux system but rather to the induced expression of MexXY in KG2505F1{Delta}D by tetracycline or norfloxacin, as reported previously (11).

Thus, we conclude that among the tested efflux systems, MexAB-OprM functions primarily and effectively in the extrusion of penem antibiotics in P. aeruginosa and that MexCD-OprJ is the compensatory system for penem efflux. Moreover, the potency of MexXY-OprM in the extrusion of penems is trivial. Penem antibiotics may not be able to be used for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections because of the highly intrinsic resistance of this bacterium to these agents (18). However, overexpression of MexAB-OprM in strain KG5002, which lacks MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexXY-OprM, causes increases of more than 1,000-fold in the MICs of faropenem, AMA3176, Sh29482, and Sch34343, whereas overexpression of MexCD-OprJ or MexXY-OprM did not cause comparable increases. This shows that these agents are useful tools for investigating the molecular mechanisms of extrusion by the efflux system, such as the substrate recognition mechanism. In fact, by using faropenem, we recently succeeded in isolating and characterizing genes encoding a substrate specificity-altered MexD mutant (N. Gotoh and T. Satou, unpublished data).


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This research was supported by grants for scientific research to N.G. from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan and from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Yamashina, Kyoto 607-8414, Japan. Phone: 81-75-595-4642. Fax: 81-75-583-2230. E-mail: ngotoh{at}mb.kyoto-phu.ac.jp. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Aires, J. R., T. Köhler, H. Nikaido, and P. Plésiat. 1999. Involvement of an active efflux system in the natural resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to aminoglycosides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2624-2628.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. 2
  3. Barry, A. L., K. E. Aldridge, S. D. Allen, P. C. Fuchs, E. H. Gerlach, R. N. Jones, and M. A. Pfaller. 1988. In vitro activity of FCE 22101, imipenem, and ceftazidime against over 6,000 bacterial isolates and MIC quality control limits of FCE 22101. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 7:794-798.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. 3
  5. Fuchs, P. C., A. L. Barry, and D. L. Sewell. 1995. Antibacterial activity of WY-49605 compared with those of six other oral agents and selection of disk content for disk diffusion susceptibility testing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:1472-1479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. 4
  7. Gootz, T., J. Retsema, A. Girard, E. Hamanaka, M. Anderson, and S. Sokolowski. 1989. In vitro activity of CP-65,207, a new penem antimicrobial agent, in comparison with those of other agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33:1160-1166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. 5
  9. Gotoh, N., N. Itoh, H. Tsujimoto, J. Yamagishi, Y. Oyamada, and T. Nishino. 1994. Isolation of OprM-deficient mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by transposon insertion mutagenesis: evidence of involvement in multiple antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 122:267-274.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. 6
  11. Gotoh, N., H. Tsujimoto, A. Nomura, K. Okamoto, M. Tsuda, and T. Nishino. 1998. Functional replacement of OprJ by OprM in the MexCD-OprJ multidrug efflux system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 165:21-27.[Medline]
  12. 7
  13. Gotoh, N., H. Tsujimoto, M. Tsuda, K. Okamoto, A. Nomura, T. Wada, M. Nakahashi, and T. Nishino. 1998. Characterization of the MexC-MexD-OprJ multidrug efflux system in {Delta}mexA-mexB-oprM mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1938-1943.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. 8
  15. Köhler, T., M. Michéa-Hamzehpour, U. Henze, N. Gotoh, L. K. Curty, and J. C. Pechere. 1997. Characterization of MexE-MexF-OprN, a positively regulated multidrug efflux system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Microbiol. 23:345-354.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. 9
  17. Li, X.-Z., H. Nikaido, and K. Poole. 1995. Role of MexA-MexB-OprM in antibiotic efflux in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:1948-1953.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. 10
  19. Li, X.-Z., L. Zhang, and K. Poole. 2000. Interplay between the MexA-MexB-OprM multidrug efflux system and the outer membrane barrier in the multiple antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 45:433-436.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. 11
  21. Masuda, N., E. Sakagawa, S. Ohya, N. Gotoh, H. Tsujimoto, and T. Nishino. 2000. Contribution of the MexX-MexY-OprM efflux system to intrinsic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2242-2246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. 12
  23. Masuda, N., E. Sakagawa, S. Ohya, N. Gotoh, H. Tsujimoto, and T. Nishino. 2000. Substrate specificities of MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexXY-OprM efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:3322-3327.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. 13
  25. Matsuda, K., K. Sasaki, K. Inoue, H. Kondo, M. Inoue, and S. Mitsuhashi. 1985. In vitro antibacterial activity of Sch 34343 and its stability to ß-lactamases and renal dehydropeptidase 1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 28:684-688.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. 14
  27. Mine, T., Y. Morita, A. Kataoka, T. Mizushima, and T. Tsuchiya. 1999. Expression in Escherichia coli of a new multidrug efflux pump, MexXY, from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:415-417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. 15
  29. Neu, H. C., and P. Labthavikul. 1982. Antibacterial activity of an oral penem, Sch 29482. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 9(Suppl.):49-57.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. 16
  31. Neu, H. C., N. X. Chin, and P. Labthavikul. 1985. The in-vitro activity of a novel penem FCE 22101 compared to other ß-lactam antibiotics. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 16:305-313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. 17
  33. Nishino, T., Y. Maeda, E. Ohtsu, S. Koizuka, T. Nishihara, H. Adachi, K. Okamoto, and M. Ishiguro. 1989. Studies on penem antibiotics. II. In vitro activity of SUN5555, a new oral penem. J. Antibiot. 42:977-988.[Medline]
  34. 18
  35. Okamoto, K., N. Gotoh, and T. Nishino. 2001. Pseudomonas aeruginosa reveals high intrinsic resistance to penem antibiotics: penem resistance mechanisms and their interplay. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1964-1971.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. 19
  37. Poole, K., K. Krebes, C. McNally, and S. Neshat. 1993. Multiple antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: evidence for involvement of an efflux operon. J. Bacteriol. 175:7363-7372.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. 20
  39. Poole, K., N. Gotoh, H. Tsujimoto, Q. Zhao, A. Wada, T. Yamasaki, S. Neshat, J. Yamagishi, X.-Z. Li, and T. Nishino. 1996. Overexpression of the mexC-mexD-oprJ efflux operon in nfxB-type multidrug-resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Microbiol. 21:713-724.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. 21
  41. Reeves, D. S., H. A. Holt, and M. J. Bywater. 1985. Comparative in-vitro activity of Sch 34343, a new penem antibiotic. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 15(Suppl.):57-66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. 22
  43. Stover, C. K., X. Q. Pham, A. L. Erwin, S. D. Mizoguchi, P. Warrener, M. J. Hickey, F. S. L. Brinkman, W. O. Hufnagle, D. J. Kowalik, M. Lagrou, R. L. Garber, L. Goltry, E. Tolentino, S. Westbrock-Wadman, Y. Yuan, L. L. Brody, S. N. Coulter, K. R. Folger, A. Kas, K. Larbig, R. Lim, K. Smith, D. Spencer, G. K.-S. Wong, Z. Wu, I. T. Paulsen, J. Reizer, M. H. Saier, R. E. W. Hancock, S. Lory, and M. V. Olson. 2000. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature 406:959-964.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. 23
  45. Washington, J. A., and A. L. Barry. 1974. Dilution test procedures, p. 410-417. In E. H. Lennette, E. H. Spaulding, and J. P. Traunt (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 2nd ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  46. 24
  47. Wise, R., J. M. Andrews, and G. Danks. 1983. Comparison of in vitro activity of FCE 22101, a new penem, with those of other ß-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 24:909-914.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. 25
  49. Yoneyama, H., A. Ocaktan, N. Gotoh, T. Nishino, and T. Nakae. 1998. Subunit swapping in the Mex-extrusion pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 244:898-902.[CrossRef][Medline]


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2002, p. 2696-2699, Vol. 46, No. 8
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.8.2696-2699.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Drago, L., De Vecchi, E., Nicola, L., Tocalli, L., Gismondo, M. R. (2005). In vitro selection of resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. by levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin alone and in combination with {beta}-lactams and amikacin. J Antimicrob Chemother 56: 353-359 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Poole, K. (2005). Efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 56: 20-51 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Noguchi, N., Suwa, J., Narui, K., Sasatsu, M., Ito, T., Hiramatsu, K., Song, J.-H. (2005). Susceptibilities to antiseptic agents and distribution of antiseptic-resistance genes qacA/B and smr of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated in Asia during 1998 and 1999. J Med Microbiol 54: 557-565 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okamoto, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nishino, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okamoto, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nishino, T.