This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giacometti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Scalise, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giacometti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Scalise, G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2002, p. 2885-2888, Vol. 46, No. 9
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.9.2885-2888.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Efficacy of Quinupristin-Dalfopristin in Preventing Vascular Graft Infection Due to Staphylococcus epidermidis with Intermediate Resistance to Glycopeptides

Andrea Giacometti,1* Oscar Cirioni,1 Roberto Ghiselli,2 Fiorenza Orlando,3 Federico Mocchegiani,2 Alessandra Riva,1 Maria Simona Del Prete,1 Vittorio Saba,2 and Giorgio Scalise1

Institute of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, University of Ancona,1 Department of General Surgery, Istituto Nazionale Riposo e Cura Anziani Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, University of Ancona,2 Biotechnology Centre, Research Department, Istituto Nazionale Riposo e Cura Anziani Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Ancona, Italy3

Received 30 October 2001/ Returned for modification 26 February 2002/ Accepted 3 May 2002


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
A rat model was used to investigate the efficacy of quinupristin-dalfopristin (Q-D) in the prevention of vascular prosthetic graft infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis with intermediate resistance to glycopeptides. The in vitro activity of the compound was compared to that of vancomycin by MIC determination and time-kill study. Moreover, the efficacy of collagen-sealed Q-D-soaked Dacron was evaluated in a rat model of graft infection. Graft infections were established in the subcutaneous tissue of the backs of 120 adult male Wistar rats. The in vivo study included a control group, one contaminated group that did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis, two contaminated groups that received grafts soaked with 10 and 100 µg of Q-D per ml, respectively, and two contaminated groups that received grafts soaked with 10 and 100 µg of vancomycin per ml, respectively. Rats that received Dacron grafts soaked with 100 µg of Q-D per ml showed no evidence of infection (<10 CFU/ml). In contrast, for rats that received Dacron grafts soaked with 10 µg of Q-D per ml and Dacron grafts soaked with 10 or 100 µg of vancomycin per ml, the quantitative graft cultures demonstrated 2.2 x 102 ± 1.3 x 102, 2.2 x 106 ± 1.9 x 105, and 5.6 x 102 ± 0.3 x 102 CFU/ml, respectively. Taken together the results of the study demonstrate that the use of Dacron grafts soaked with Q-D can result in significant bacterial growth inhibition and show that this compound is potentially valuable for prevention of vascular prosthetic graft infection.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
The increasing use of foreign material in many fields of modern surgery is associated with a definitive risk of bacterial infection. Coagulase-negative staphylococci, chiefly the skin commensal Staphylococcus epidermidis, are among the most common pathogens that cause biomaterial infections and the most frequent cause of late-appearing vascular graft infections in humans (1, 2, 5, 6, 10, 16, 19). Vascular prosthetic graft infection is one of the most feared complications that the vascular surgeon treats; although most cases are resolved by removal of the device and antibiotic therapy, serious complications may result, including organ failure, amputation, metastatic infection, and death. Effective strategies for the prevention of prosthetic infection vary from device to device. The centerpieces of prophylaxis are asepsis and perioperative administration of systemic antibiotics (3, 5). As adjunctive prophylaxis, in the case of vascular grafts, the use of antimicrobials that bind to prosthetic grafts at high concentrations has been proposed (4, 6, 8, 9, 15, 20, 22, 24, 26).

Since the emergence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci, glycopeptides have often been the only effective drugs. For this reason, the emergence of staphylococcal strains exhibiting reduced sensitivities to vancomycin is of particular concern. The emergence of vancomycin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci was described in the 1980s. For this reason, new strategies are needed to treat infections caused by these multidrug-resistant organisms and to reduce the increasing selection pressure of antibiotics on gram-positive pathogens (11, 18, 21, 23, 25).

Various new agents have been demonstrated to have significant in vitro activities against staphylococci. One of these compounds is the new semisynthetic injectable streptogramin quinupristin-dalfopristin (Q-D), composed of two components which may act synergistically: quinupristin, a peptide macrolactone classified as a type B streptogramin, and dalfopristin, a polyunsaturated macrolactone classified as a type A streptogramin, in a 30:70 ratio. It has a focused spectrum of in vitro activity against gram-positive cocci, including multidrug-resistant isolates of staphylococci, streptococci, and Enterococcus faecium (7, 17, 27).

In this study we used one strain of S. epidermidis with intermediate resistance to vancomycin to investigate the in vitro activity of Q-D and its in vivo efficacy when it was bound to a Dacron graft for the prevention of prosthesis infection in a rat model.


arrow
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 
In vitro studies. (i) Organisms. The strain of methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis with intermediate resistance to vancomycin used in this study was isolated from a clinical specimen submitted for routine bacteriological investigation to the Institute of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, University of Ancona, Ancona, Italy. This isolate is described by use of the acronym VISE (vancomycin-intermediate S. epidermidis). Commercially available S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 was used as a quality control strain in the in vitro investigations.

(ii) Drugs. Q-D was obtained from Aventis Pharma, Centre de Recherches, Vitry-Alfortville, France. Vancomycin was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy. Laboratory powders were diluted in accordance with the recommendations of the manufacturers. Solutions of drugs were made fresh on the day of assay or were stored at -80°C in the dark for up to 20 days.

(iii) Antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The antimicrobial susceptibilities of the strains to Q-D and vancomycin were determined by the broth microdilution method described by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (13). In addition, the strains were tested for their susceptibilities to vancomycin by the NCCLS reference disk diffusion method with 30-µg vancomycin discs (14). Experiments were performed in triplicate.

(iv) Time-kill studies. To perform time-kill studies, the VISE strain was grown at 37°C in Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth. When the bacteria were in the log phase of growth the suspensions were centrifuged at 1,000 x g for 15 min, the supernatants were discarded, and the bacteria were resuspended and diluted with sterile saline to achieve a concentration of 5 x 1010 CFU/ml saline. The organisms were resuspended in fresh MH broth at approximately 5 x 105 cells/ml and exposed to Q-D and vancomycin (one and four times the MIC) for up to 24 h at 37°C. Throughout the experiments, triplicate samples (0.1 ml) were withdrawn after 0, 1, 3, 6, and 24 h of incubation at 37°C. Up to seven 10-fold dilutions were made in MH broth from each sample, and, finally, the dilutions were spread onto MH agar plates and incubated for up to 72 h at 37°C to obtain viable colonies. The limit of detection for this method was approximately 10 CFU/ml. In preliminary experiments, antibiotic carryover was ruled out by plating samples of bacterial suspensions in the presence or absence of antibiotics.

In vivo studies. (i) Rat model. Adult male Wistar rats (weight range, 250 to 300 g) were studied. The study included a group with no graft contamination and no local antibiotic treatment (uncontaminated control group), one contaminated group that did not receive any local antibiotic treatment (untreated control group), two contaminated groups that received grafts soaked with 10 and 100 µg of Q-D per ml, respectively, and two contaminated groups that received grafts soaked with 10 and 100 µg of vancomycin per ml, respectively. Each group included 20 animals. Rats were anesthetized with ether, the hair on the back was shaved, and the skin was cleansed with 10% povidone-iodine solution. One subcutaneous pocket was made on each side of the median line through a 1.5-cm incision. Aseptically, 1-cm2 sterile collagen-sealed Dacron grafts (Albograft; Sorin Biomedica Cardio, Saluggia VC, Italy) were implanted into the pockets. Before implantation, the Dacron graft segments were impregnated with Q-D and vancomycin, each at concentrations of 10 and 100 µg/ml. Immediately before implantation the grafts were soaked for 20 min in a sterile solution of the agents mentioned above. The pockets were closed with skin clips, and sterile saline solution (1 ml) containing the VISE strain at a concentration of 2 x 107 CFU/ml was inoculated onto the graft surface by using a tuberculin syringe to create a subcutaneous fluid-filled pocket (2). The animals were returned to individual cages and thoroughly examined daily. All grafts were explanted at 7 days following implantation. This study was approved by the Animal Research Ethics Committee of the Istituto Nazionale Riposo e Cura Anziani Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, University of Ancona.

(ii) Assessment of infection. The explanted grafts were placed in sterile tubes, washed in sterile saline solution, placed in tubes containing 10 ml of phosphate-buffered saline solution, and sonicated for 5 min to remove the adherent bacteria from the grafts. Quantitation of viable bacteria was performed by culturing serial 10-fold dilutions (0.1 ml) of the bacterial suspension onto blood agar plates. All plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h and evaluated for the presence of the VISE strain. The organisms were quantitated by counting the number of CFU per plate. The limit of detection for this method was approximately 10 CFU/ml.

Statistical analysis. MICs are presented as the modes of three separate experiments. Quantitative culture results regarding the in vivo experiments are presented as the means ± standard deviations of the means. The results were compared by analysis of variance of the log-transformed data by the Tukey-Kramer honestly significant difference test. Significance was accepted when the P value was <=0.05.


arrow
RESULTS
 
In vitro data. According to the broth microdilution method recommended by the NCCLS, vancomycin MICs were 0.25 and 8 µg/ml for S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 and the VISE strain, respectively, while Q-D MICs were 0.50 and 1 µg/ml, respectively. The different patterns of susceptibility were confirmed by the disk diffusion test: S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 showed zone sizes of 18 mm with the vancomycin disc, while the intermediate resistance of the VISE strain to vancomycin was demonstrated by a zone size of 11 mm.

Q-D at 2 µg/ml (four times the MIC) produced reductions in bacterial counts of 0.1, 0.3, 1.1, and 1.8 log10 CFU/ml after 1, 3, 6, and 24 h of incubation, respectively. This killing was comparable to that obtained with Q-D at 0.5 µg/ml (one time the MIC). Vancomycin at 32 µg/ml (four times the MIC) produced reductions in bacterial counts of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.6 log10 CFU/ml after 1, 3, 6, and 24 h of incubation, respectively, while vancomycin at 8 µg/ml (one time the MIC) exhibited a low level of bactericidal activity, producing reductions in bacterial counts of 0.0, 0.1, 0.4, and 0.6 log10 CFU/ml, respectively (data not shown).

In vivo studies. None of the animals included in the uncontaminated control group had microbiological evidence of graft infection. On the contrary, all 20 rats included in the untreated control group demonstrated evidence of graft infection, with quantitative culture results showing 5.1 x 106 ± 8.8 x 105 CFU/ml. Interestingly, only the group with Dacron grafts soaked in 100 µg of Q-D per ml showed no evidence of staphylococcal infection (<10 CFU/ml). In contrast, the quantitative graft cultures for the rats that received Dacron grafts soaked in 10 µg of Q-D per ml and Dacron grafts soaked in vancomycin demonstrated bacterial growth (Table 1). None of the animals included in any group died or had clinical evidence of drug-related adverse effects, such as local signs of perigraft inflammation, anorexia, vomiting, diarrhea, or behavioral alterations.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Efficacies of Q-D and vancomycin against a glycopeptide-intermediate S. epidermidis strain causing graft infection in a rat model

There were significant differences in the results of the quantitative bacterial graft cultures when the data obtained for the antibiotic-treated groups were compared with those obtained for the contaminated control group (P < 0.05), with the exception of the group treated with grafts soaked in 10 µg of vancomycin per ml. When data obtained for each group with grafts soaked in an antibiotic were compared with those obtained for any other group with a graft soaked in an antibiotic, the differences were always statistically significant for grafts soaked in 100 µg of Q-D per ml (P < 0.05). Finally, no statistically significant differences were observed between the group with grafts soaked in 10 µg of Q-D per ml and the group with grafts soaked in 100 µg of vancomycin per ml.


arrow
DISCUSSION
 
Debate continues over the best treatment for prosthetic vascular graft infections. S. epidermidis is the most important pathogen causing infections related to implanted foreign bodies. It has been recovered from the skin, subcutaneous fat, lymph nodes, and arterial walls of more than one-third of individuals undergoing vascular reconstruction, despite the use of aseptic vascular surgical technique and prophylactic antibiotics. Most important in the pathogenesis of foreign body-associated infection due to this organism is the colonization of the polymer surface by formation of a biofilm (2). For this reason, prevention through effective antibiotic prophylaxis plays a pivotal role in the control of these infections and has an important impact on patient mortality and the cost-effectiveness of hospital care.

The success of prophylactic antibiotics during surgery is dependent on the pharmacokinetics of the antibiotic in tissue and the maintenance of adequate levels of the antibiotic in tissue for the duration of the vascular surgical procedure. Nevertheless, errors in the sterilization procedures and the increases in the incidence and the levels of resistance of S. epidermidis can predispose individuals to prosthesis infections (2, 3, 10). Glycopeptides such as vancomycin are used parenterally to treat infections caused by gram-positive bacteria, especially staphylococcal infections after the emergence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Recently, they have been administered as perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (25). Nevertheless, the recent emergence of glycopeptide resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci heightens concern about the need for other antistaphylococcal agents (12, 18, 21).

Analysis of the data from in vitro studies shows that Q-D and vancomycin had similar activities against the control strain, S. epidermidis ATCC 12228, while Q-D exhibited a higher level of activity than vancomycin against the VISE clinical strain. In fact, the broth microdilution method and the disk diffusion method recommended by the NCCLS showed that vancomycin exerted intermediate activity against the VISE strain, although there are still differences between the current NCCLS interpretive standards and the recommendations made to define categories of susceptibility to glycopeptides in some other countries (25).

The in vivo results were similar to those reported by other investigators (4, 6, 8, 9, 15, 22, 24, 26), who found that the use of Dacron grafts soaked in an antibiotic can result in significant bacterial growth inhibition, even though high concentrations of organisms were topically inoculated on the Dacron prostheses. Actually, statistical analysis demonstrated that any prophylactic antibiotic treatment except vancomycin at 10 µg/ml was useful. Nevertheless only Q-D at the highest concentration tested inhibited bacterial growth within the limits of detection. Finally, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups that received grafts soaked with 10 µg of Q-D per ml and those that received grafts soaked with 100 µg of vancomycin per ml. However, it is noteworthy that Q-D and vancomycin are physically different compounds and the quantitative results could be affected by the lack of equivalent abilities of the two antibiotics to coat the artificial materials.

It has long been recognized that the treatment of serious bacteremia caused by staphylococci, such as vascular graft infection, typically requires the use of agents with bactericidal activities against the organism. This fact is likely emphasized by the recent emergence in clinical settings of multidrug-resistant bacteria that belong, for the most part, to the staphylococcal species. New therapeutic options are needed, although experience demonstrates that every new antimicrobial agent introduced into clinical practice can be plagued by the emergence of organisms resistant to its effect. The strong in vitro activity and the prophylactic in vivo efficacy demonstrated by Q-D against a staphylococcal strain with decreased susceptibility to the glycopeptides used in the present study make Q-D potentially useful for future topical antimicrobial treatments, such as perioperative chemoprophylaxis in prosthetic surgery.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Clinica delle Malattie Infettive, c/o Ospedale Regionale, via Conca, 60020 Ancona, Italy. Phone: 39 071 5963715. Fax: 39 071 5963468. E-mail: anconacmi{at}interfree.it. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Bandyk, D. F., M. L. Novotney, M. R. Back, B. L. Johnson, and D. C. Schmacht. 2001. Expanded application of in situ replacement for prosthetic graft infection. J. Vasc. Surg. 34:411-420.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. 2
  3. Bergamini, T. M., R. A. Corpus, Jr., K. R. Brittian, J. C. Peyton, and W. G. Cheadle. 1994. The natural history of bacterial biofilm graft infection. J. Surg. Res. 56:393-396.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. 3
  5. Bergamini, T. M., J. C., Peyton, and W. G. Cheadle. 1992. Prophylactic antibiotics prevent bacterial biofilm graft infection. J. Surg. Res. 52:101-105.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. 4
  7. Chervu, A., W. S. Moore, H. A. Gelabert, M. D. Colburn, and M. Chvapil. 1991. Prevention of graft infection by use of prostheses bonded with a rifampin collagen release system. J. Vasc. Surg. 14:521-524.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. 5
  9. Citak, M. S., J. I. Cué, J. C. Peyton, and M. A. Malangoni. 1992. The critical relationship of antibiotic dose and bacterial contamination in experimental infection. J. Surg. Res. 52:127-130.[Medline]
  10. 6
  11. Coggia, M., O. Goeau-Brissoniere, V. Leflon, M. H. Nicolas, and J. C. Pechere. 2001. Experimental treatment of vascular graft infection due to Staphylococcus epidermidis by in situ replacement with a rifampin-bonded polyester graft. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 15:421-429.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. 7
  13. Fuchs, P. C., A. L. Barry, and S. D. Brown. 2001. Interactions of quinupristin-dalfopristin with eight other antibiotics as measured by time-kill studies with 10 strains of Staphylococcus aureus for which quinupristin-dalfopristin alone was not bactericidal. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:2662-2665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. 8
  15. Goeau-Brissoniere, O., C. Leport, F. Bacourt, C. Lebrault, R. Comte, and J. C. Pechere. 1991. Prevention of vascular graft infection by rifampin bonding to a gelatin-sealed Dacron graft. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 5:408-412.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. 9
  17. Harvey, R. A., D. V. Alcid, and R. S. Greco. 1982. Antibiotic bonding to polytetrafluoroethylene with tridodecylmethylammonium chloride. Surgery 92:504-512.[Medline]
  18. 10
  19. Henke, P. K., T. M. Bergamini, S. M. Rose, and J. D. Richardson. 1998. Current opinion in prosthetic vascular graft infection. Am. Surg. 64:39-45.[Medline]
  20. 11
  21. Hiramatsu, K., H. Hanaki, T. Ino, K. Yabuta, T. Oguri, and F. C. Tenover. 1997. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40:135-136.[Free Full Text]
  22. 12
  23. McManus, A. T., C. W. Goodwin, and B. A. Pruitt, Jr. 1998. Observations on the risk of resistance with the extended use of vancomycin. Arch. Surg. 133:1207-1211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. 13
  25. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2001. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 5th ed. Approved standard M7-A5. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  26. 14
  27. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2001. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests, 7th ed. Approved standard M2-A7. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  28. 15
  29. Osada, T., K. Yamamura, K. Fujimoto, K. Mizuno, T. Sakurai, M. Ohta, and T. Nabeshima. 1999. Prophylaxis of local vascular graft infection with levofloxacin incorporated into albumin-sealed Dacron graft. Microbiol. Immunol. 43:317-321.[Medline]
  30. 16
  31. Phaneuf, M. D., W. C. Quist, M. J. Bide, and F. W. LoGerfo. 1995. Modification of the polyethylene terephthalate (Dacron) via denier reduction: effects on material tensile strength, weight, and protein binding capabilities. J. Appl. Biomater. 6:289-299.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. 17
  33. Sahgal, V. S., C. Urban, N. Mariano, F. Weinbaum, J. Turner, and J. J. Rahal. 1995. Quinupristin/dalfopristin (RP 59500) therapy for vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium aortic graft infection: case report. Microb. Drug Resist. 1:245-247.[Medline]
  34. 18
  35. Sanyal, D., A. P. Johnson, R. C. George, B. D. Cookson, and A. J. Williams. 1991. Peritonitis due to vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. Lancet 337:54.[Medline]
  36. 19
  37. Sardelic, F., P. Y. Ao, D. A. Taylor, and J. P. Fletcher. 1996. Prophylaxis against Staphylococcus epidermidis vascular graft infection with rifampicin-soaked, gelatin-sealed Dacron. Cardiovasc. Surg. 4:389-392.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. 20
  39. Sardelic, F., and J. P. Fletcher. 1995. Rifampicin impregnated Dacron grafts: no development of rifampicin resistance in an animal model. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 9:314-318.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. 21
  41. Schwalbe, R. S., J. T. Stapleton, and P. H. Gilligan. 1987. Emergence of vancomycin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci. N. Engl. J. Med. 316:927-931.[Medline]
  42. 22
  43. Shue, W. B., S. C. Worosilo, A. P. Donetz, S. Z. Trooskin, R. A. Harvey, and R. S. Greco. 1988. Prevention of vascular prosthetic infection with an antibiotic-bonded Dacron graft. J. Vasc. Surg. 8:600-605.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. 23
  45. Sieradzki, K., P. Villari, and A. Tomasz. 1998. Decreased susceptibilities to teicoplanin and vancomycin among coagulase-negative methicillin-resistant clinical isolates of staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:100-107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. 24
  47. Vicaretti, M., W. J. Hawthorne, P. Y. Ao, and J. P. Fletcher. 1998. An increased concentration of rifampicin bonded to gelatin-sealed Dacron reduces the incidence of subsequent graft infections following a staphylococcal challenge. Cardiovasc. Surg. 6:268-273.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. 25
  49. Woodford, N., A. P., Johnson, D. Morrison, and D. C. E. Speller. 1995. Current perspectives on glycopeptide resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 8:585-615.[Abstract]
  50. 26
  51. Yamamura, K., T. Sakurai, K. Yano, T. Osada, and T. Nabeshima. 1995. Prevention of vascular graft infection by sisomicin incorporated into fibrin glue. Microbiol. Immunol. 39:895-896.[Medline]
  52. 27
  53. Zarrouk, V., B. Bozdogan, R. Leclercq, L. Garry, C. Feger, C. Carbon, and B. Fantin. 2001. Activities of the combination of quinupristin-dalfopristin with rifampin in vitro and in experimental endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus strains with various phenotypes of resistance to macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1244-1248.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2002, p. 2885-2888, Vol. 46, No. 9
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.9.2885-2888.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giacometti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Scalise, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giacometti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Scalise, G.