Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bacon, T. H. Articles by Hodges-Savola, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bacon, T. H. Articles by Hodges-Savola, C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2002, p. 3042-3044, Vol. 46, No. 9
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.9.3042-3044.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Surveillance for Antiviral-Agent-Resistant Herpes Simplex Virus in the General Population with Recurrent Herpes Labialis

Teresa H. Bacon,^1* Ron J. Boon,¹ Margaret Schultz,² and Cheryl Hodges-Savola³

GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, Weybridge, Surrey KT15 0DE, United Kingdom,¹ GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709,² ViroMed Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota 55343³

Received 26 December 2001/ Returned for modification 29 March 2002/ Accepted 28 May 2002

Top Abstract Text References

 
In a general population survey in the United States, the prevalence of antiviral-agent-resistant herpes simplex virus was very low among more than 1,000 isolates from individuals with an episode of recurrent herpes labialis not treated with topical antiviral agents. Two isolates had borderline resistance to acyclovir (0.2%), and all were susceptible to penciclovir.

Top Abstract Text References

 
Between October 1998 and February 1999, a study was undertaken in 10 states across the United States to determine the background prevalence of herpes simplex virus (HSV) resistant to acyclovir or penciclovir among isolates from subjects with an episode of recurrent herpes labialis (RHL) which had not been treated with a topical antiviral agent. Results from other studies with immunocompetent patients with HSV infection have shown that the prevalence of resistant virus is low (1, 2, 3; M. Reyes, J. Graber, N. Weatherall, C. Hodges-Savola, W. C. Reeves, and the Task Force on Herpesvirus Resistance, 11th International Conference on Antiviral Research, April 1998, Antivir. Res. 37:A44 [abstract], 1998) and stable, despite increasing rates of use of antiviral medication.

Topical penciclovir cream was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1996 as a prescription product for the treatment of RHL. Topical acyclovir cream for the treatment of RHL is available in many markets, often without prescription, but has not been approved for use in the United States. The survey formed part of a program to support an application to switch penciclovir from a prescription product to a nonprescription product (one that could be sold over the counter [OTC]). It was anticipated that approval for OTC use will increase the levels of use of penciclovir, and therefore, any future change in the prevalence of resistant virus could be tracked against a background prevalence established prior to the switch to OTC status. At the time of implementation, the survey was sponsored jointly by two pharmaceutical companies and was planned in collaboration with the Task Force on Herpes Simplex Virus Resistance.

(These data were presented at the Thirteenth International Conference on Antiviral Research, Baltimore, Md., April 2000.)

The study was conducted in accordance with good clinical practice and received Essex Institutional Review Board approval. Pharmacists in 47 community-based pharmacies were responsible for the clinical phase of the study (9). The subjects volunteered for the study in response to advertisements placed in the media (9). Eligible subjects were aged 12 years and had perioral herpes labialis at the vesicle or soft ulcer stage. No topical treatment with an antiviral agent was permitted prior to completion of the study, although subjects who received any oral antiviral agent for HSV infection were not excluded. Efforts were made to identify individuals who may have been immunocompromised by asking subjects to complete one page of the case report form, which was then sealed in an envelope by the subject to maintain confidentiality and subsequently transferred to the data management team. Subjects responded to questions on medical history (history of cancer, human immunodeficiency virus infection [HIV] or AIDS, or organ transplantation) and completed a checklist of medications that they were taking, use of which may have implied that the subject was immunocompromised. The checklist specified drugs with immunosuppressant activity or drugs used to treat HIV infection or AIDS or other diseases associated with defects of the immune system.

A total of 1,803 subjects were recruited, and each subject was swabbed once. The study population (n = 1,795 subjects with swabs processed for virus isolation) was principally female (67.6%), with a mean age of 37.5 years (standard deviation [SD], 15.34 years). Caucasians formed the largest racial group (89.9%). The preponderance of female Caucasians in the study may reflect that sector of the population that is concerned about RHL and/or that is motivated to seek treatment (4, 7). The mean ± SD number of episodes experienced during the previous 12 months was 5.2 ± 5.26, and the mean age at the first episode was 13.1 years. The mean ± SD duration of an episode of RHL was reported to be 8.1 ± 4.8 days. Lesions were swabbed by the pharmacist. The swabs were stored in transport medium at 4°C and shipped to a central laboratory within 3 to 4 days.

Virus was isolated in primary rabbit kidney cells (8). A cell suspension prepared from each infected culture was used to type the virus by indirect immunofluorescence. Vero cells and MRC-5 cells were used for the plaque reduction assays with acyclovir and penciclovir, respectively. Monolayers in six-well plates were infected with 50 to 100 PFU per well. After adsorption, the inoculum was removed and replaced with culture medium containing methylcellulose (2%) and the test antiviral agent (final concentrations, 0 to 30 µg/ml, tested in duplicate). After incubation for 3 days at 36 ± 1°C in 5 to 7% CO₂, the monolayers were fixed and stained, the plaques were counted, and the 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC₅₀s) were calculated. Two standard HSV type 1 (HSV-1) reference strains were included in all assays, SC16 (which is sensitive to acyclovir and penciclovir) and DM21 (a thymidine kinase-negative mutant which is resistant to acyclovir and penciclovir). Summary IC₅₀ data for these strains are provided in Table 1.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Summary of HSV-1 susceptibility to acyclovir and penciclovir by antiviral use and medical historya

The 1,803 cultures yielded 1,087 isolates, all of which were typed as HSV-1. A total of 1,002 isolates were tested for their susceptibilities to acyclovir and penciclovir, and 2 additional isolates were also tested for their susceptibilities to penciclovir. The breakpoint for defining resistance to acyclovir was an IC₅₀ 2 µg/ml (5). Two criteria were applied to define penciclovir resistance: (i) an IC₅₀ 2 µg/ml and (ii) an IC₅₀ three or more times greater than the mean IC₅₀ of penciclovir for all isolates in the survey (0.84 µg/ml).

Two HSV-1 isolates were confirmed to be resistant to acyclovir (IC₅₀s, 3.21 and 2.41 µg/ml, respectively), but resistance was borderline in this assay and in the original assay (IC₅₀s, 2.21 and 4.35 µg/ml, respectively). Both isolates were sensitive to penciclovir (IC₅₀s, 0.38 and 0.34 µg/ml, respectively). The two subjects with acyclovir-resistant HSV-1 isolates were immunocompetent; one subject had no history of antiviral agent use, and the other subject reported prior use of acyclovir (not during the episode evaluated for the present study).

All other isolates were susceptible to acyclovir; therefore, the prevalence of acyclovir-resistant HSV-1 isolates was 0.20% (2 of 1,002 isolates tested; 95% confidence interval, 0.02 to 0.72%). A total of 1,004 HSV-1 isolates were tested for their susceptibilities to penciclovir, and none was found to be resistant (0 of 1,004 isolates tested; prevalence, 0.00%; 95% confidence interval, 0.00 to 0.37%). These results are consistent with data from a similar survey conducted in the United Kingdom at a time when topical acyclovir had been available OTC for 5 years and topical penciclovir had been available as a prescription medicine for 2 years (1). One resistant HSV-1 isolate which was cross resistant to acyclovir and penciclovir was identified (1 of 924 isolates tested for susceptibility to acyclovir; 1 of 915 isolates tested for susceptibility to penciclovir; prevalence, 0.1%) (1). Other surveys with immunocompetent populations, predominantly, patients with genital herpes, have reported a prevalence of HSV resistance of 0.1 to 0.7% (2, 3; Reyes et al., Antivir. Res. 37:A44 [abstract], 1998). The historical prevalence of acyclovir-resistant HSV isolates among untreated, immunocompetent patients, as measured by the plaque reduction assay, is 0.3% (6). Resistant HSV is more common in immunocompromised patients; for example, in a surveillance study by Reyes et al. (Reyes et al., Antivir. Res. 37:A44 [abstract], 1998), 4 of 62 (6.5%) isolates from HIV-infected patients were resistant to acyclovir.

IC₅₀ data from the present survey were analyzed to investigate differences in the susceptibilities of isolates from the study subjects to acyclovir and penciclovir on the basis of their reported use of antiviral agents, immunocompetence, or history of RHL (Table 1). For isolates from subjects who reported use of antiviral medication to treat herpesvirus infections, the median IC₅₀ was similar to the median IC₅₀ for isolates from subjects who had never used antiviral medication both for acyclovir (P = 0.211) and for penciclovir (P = 0.649). For the small number of isolates (n = 49) from subjects who used oral acyclovir, famciclovir, or valacyclovir at the time of the study, the median IC₅₀ of acyclovir (0.31 µg/ml) was significantly lower than that for isolates from subjects who were not using antiviral medication (0.43 µg/ml) (P = 0.025). This difference is not clinically important and may simply have arisen by chance; the parallel comparison for penciclovir showed no significant difference (P = 0.488). No other comparisons reached statistical significance, including that for immune status, although the number of subjects in this survey who may have been immunocompromised was low (Table 1).

In conclusion, the prevalence of resistant HSV-1 strains among isolates from the general population with RHL is low, consistent with earlier surveys with immunocompetent patients with HSV infection, despite the increasing rate of use of herpesvirus-specific antiviral agents over the past two decades.

 
We thank S. Khan and S. Modin for contributions to the study.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, St. George's Ave., Weybridge, Surrey KT15 0DE, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 1932 822185. Fax: 44 1932 822139. E-mail: teresa.h.bacon{at}gsk.com.

Top Abstract Text References

 

1
1. Boon, R. J., T. H. Bacon, H. L. Robey, T. J. Coleman, A. Connolly, P. Crosson, and S. L. Sacks. 2000. Antiviral susceptibilities of herpes simplex virus from immunocompetent subjects with recurrent herpes labialis: a UK-based study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 46:324-325. (Erratum, 46:1051.)[Free Full Text]
2
2. Christophers, J., J. Clayton, J. Craske, R. Ward, P. Collins, M. Trowbridge, and G. Darby. 1998. Survey of resistance of herpes simplex virus to acyclovir in Northwest England. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:868-872.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3
3. Collins, P., and M. N. Ellis. 1993. Sensitivity monitoring of clinical isolates of herpes simplex virus to acyclovir. J. Med. Virol. 1993(Suppl. 1):58-66.
4
4. Sacks, S. L., R. A. Thisted, T. M. Jones, R. A. Barbarash, D. J. Mikolich, G. E. Ruoff, J. L. Jorizzo, L. B. Gunnill, D. H. Katz, M. H. Khalil, P. R. Morrow, G. J. Yakatan, L. E. Pope, and J. E. Berg for the Docosanol 10% Cream Study Group. 2001. Clinical efficacy of topical docosanol 10% cream for herpes simplex labialis: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 45:222-230.[CrossRef][Medline]
5
5. Safrin, S., T. Elbeik, L. Phan, D. Robinson, J. Rush, A. Elbaggari, and J. Mills. 1994. Correlation between response to acyclovir and foscarnet therapy and in vitro susceptibility result for isolates of herpes simplex virus from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:1246-1250.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Sande, M., D. Armstrong, L. Corey, W. L. Drew, D. Gilbert, R. C. Moellering, Jr., and L. G. Smith. 1998. Perspectives on switching oral acyclovir from prescription to over-the-counter status: report of a consensus panel. Clin. Infect. Dis. 26:659-663.[Medline]
7
7. Spruance, S. L., T. L. Rea, C. Thoming, C., R. Tucker, R. Saltzman, and R. Boon for the Topical Penciclovir Collaborative Study Group. 1997. Penciclovir cream for the treatment of herpes simplex labialis. JAMA 277:1374-1379.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8
8. Swierkosz, E. M., and K. K. Biron. 1995. Antiviral agents and susceptibility testing, p. 1415-1423. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.). Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
9
9. Veltri, J. C., K. A. Geiringer, S. Steele, C. Richardson, and R. J. Boon. Using community pharmacies for disease surveillance: a national survey of antiviral resistance. Pharmcoepidemiol. Drug Safety, in press.

---

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2002, p. 3042-3044, Vol. 46, No. 9
0066-4804/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.9.3042-3044.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Danve-Szatanek, C., Aymard, M., Thouvenot, D., Morfin, F., Agius, G., Bertin, I., Billaudel, S., Chanzy, B., Coste-Burel, M., Finkielsztejn, L., Fleury, H., Hadou, T., Henquell, C., Lafeuille, H., Lafon, M. E., Le Faou, A., Legrand, M. C., Maille, L., Mengelle, C., Morand, P., Morinet, F., Nicand, E., Omar, S., Picard, B., Pozzetto, B., Puel, J., Raoult, D., Scieux, C., Segondy, M., Seigneurin, J. M., Teyssou, R., Zandotti, C. (2004). Surveillance Network for Herpes Simplex Virus Resistance to Antiviral Drugs: 3-Year Follow-Up. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 242-249 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bacon, T. H., Levin, M. J., Leary, J. J., Sarisky, R. T., Sutton, D. (2003). Herpes Simplex Virus Resistance to Acyclovir and Penciclovir after Two Decades of Antiviral Therapy. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16: 114-128 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bacon, T. H. Articles by Hodges-Savola, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bacon, T. H. Articles by Hodges-Savola, C.