Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mason, E. O. Articles by Kaplan, S. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mason, E. O., Jr. Articles by Kaplan, S. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2003, p. 166-169, Vol. 47, No. 1
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.1.166-169.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro Activities of Cethromycin (ABT-773), a New Ketolide, against Streptococcus pneumoniae Strains That Are Not Susceptible to Penicillin or Macrolides

Edward O. Mason Jr.,^1,2* Linda B. Lamberth,² Ellen R. Wald,³ John S. Bradley,⁴ William J. Barson,^5,6 Sheldon L. Kaplan,^1,2 and the U.S. Pediatric Multicenter Pneumococcal Surveillance Group

Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine,¹ Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas,² University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,³ Univeristy of California San Diego and the Children's Hospital of San Diego, San Diego, California,⁴ Ohio State University College of Medicine,⁵ Children's Hospital of Columbus, Columbus, Ohio⁶

Received 21 June 2002/ Returned for modification 16 September 2002/ Accepted 2 October 2002

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Pneumococcal resistance to antimicrobials presents problems to physicians for empirical treatment of acute otitis media (AOM). Three hundred thirty-three isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae selected for nonsusceptibility to penicillin (MIC >0.1 µg/ml) from the middle ear (n = 325) or mastoid (n = 8) of children seen between 1994 and 2000 at four children's hospitals in the United States were tested by broth microdilution for susceptibility to nine antibiotics. Using NCCLS 2002 breakpoints, resistance to the following drugs was as indicated: amoxicillin, 1%; azithromycin, 71%; cefprozil, 71%; ceftriaxone, 2%; cefdinir, 98%; erythromycin, 70%; levofloxacin, 0%; and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 93%. Of the penicillin- and erythromycin-nonsusceptible isolates, 97% were inhibited by cethromycin (ABT-773) and 83% were inhibited by telithromycin at a concentration of 0.125 µg/ml. Macrolide resistance among penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococci increased from 44 to 80% in the 6 years of the study from which the isolates were selected; however, the proportion of isolates with M or MLS_B phenotypes remained constant over the time period (53 and 18%, respectively). Prior treatment with a macrolide or clindamycin alone or in combination with a ß-lactam resulted in 94 or 85% of isolates causing infections being macrolide and or clindamycin resistant. No prior individual macrolide (azithromycin, erythromycin, or clarithromycin) resulted in more macrolide resistance or in a more prevalent resistance phenotype. The ketolides appear to be active antimicrobials against penicillin- and macrolide-resistant pneumococci.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The treatment of acute otitis media (AOM) continues to be a challenge to practitioners (16). Resistance to ß-lactam and macrolide antibiotics has increased over the last 6 years and has complicated empirical therapy for nonmeningeal infections, including otitis (9, 10). Increases in macrolide resistance, often linked to penicillin nonsusceptibility, further complicate effective empirical therapy. Macrolide resistance is most often mediated by one of two mechanisms: an efflux pump (M phenotype) which confers resistance to macrolides but not clindamycin, or methylation of an adenine at the antibiotic binding site on the 50s ribosomal subunit (macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B [MLS_B] phenotype). The MLS_B phenotype is resistant to all the macrolides, lincosamides (clindamycin), and streptogramin B antibiotics. The prevalence of macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae from middle ear infections varies geographically (5, 8). Macrolide resistance among isolates of S. pneumoniae recovered from children with OM from our study group during the last 6 years is approximately 51%, and clindamycin resistance for the same period is 9%. Cethromycin is a new ketolide with a broad spectrum of in vitro antibiotic activity against most ß-lactam-, macrolide-, and lincosamide-resistant strains of S. pneumoniae. The present study examined the susceptibility of penicillin-nonsusceptible middle ear isolates of S. pneumoniae to 2 ketolides (cethromycin and telithromycin) and other antimicrobials used in therapy of OM.

(This paper was presented in part at the 41st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, Ill., December 2001.)

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Isolates of S. pneumoniae recovered from the middle ear of patients with OM at four children's medical centers in the United States since 1994 were selected on the basis of nonsusceptibility to penicillin (MIC > 0.1 µg/ml). Isolates were selected to include all penicillin-resistant strains (for 253 strains, MIC > 1 µg/ml) and the penicillin-intermediate strains for which the MICs of penicillin are higher (n = 59 for MIC = 1 µg/ml, n = 19 for MIC = 0.5 µg/ml, and n = 1 each for MICs of 0.25 and 0.125 µg/ml) The isolates had been previously confirmed as S. pneumoniae by colonial and microscopic morphology, alpha hemolysis on sheep blood agar, bile solubility, and/or susceptibility to optochin. All isolates were stored in the Infectious Diseases Laboratory at Texas Children's Hospital at -80°C. Serogrouping or serotyping was performed using antisera from Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen, Denmark.

All strains were tested for susceptibility to cethromycin and telithromycin, (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill.), amoxicillin, azithromycin, cefdinir, cefprozil, ceftriaxone, erythromycin, levofloxacin, penicillin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (U.S. Pharmacopeia, Rockville, Md.), by the NCCLS broth microdilution method using an inoculum of 5 x 10⁵ CFU per well (13). Inoculum size was confirmed by quantitative culture for each test run. Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with 5% lysed horse blood was used as the test medium. The MIC was determined following incubation at 35°C for 24 h and interpreted by NCCLS breakpoints (12). S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 was tested in each batch as a control. Phenotypic determination of macrolide resistance was determined using erythromycin and clindamycin disks placed 15 to 20 mm apart on a Mueller-Hinton agar plate supplemented with 5% sheep blood (15). Resistance to both antibiotics was designated the MLS_B phenotype; resistance to erythromycin and susceptibility to clindamycin was designated the M phenotype.

Patient demographics and prior antibiotic therapy was obtained by retrospective review of the database of the United States Multicenter Pneumococcal Surveillance Study (11). Statistical calculations were performed using True Epistat (Epistat Services, Richardson, Tex.). Dichotomous variables were analyzed using the Fishers exact test.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Of the 333 penicillin-nonsusceptible isolates of S. pneumoniae selected from strains submitted between 1994 and 2000, 80 (24%) were penicillin intermediate (MIC between 0.1 and 1 µg/ml) and 253 (76%) were penicillin resistant (MIC >1 µg/ml). The majority (n = 325) were isolated from the middle ear, and 8 isolates were taken from mastoid tissue. The children ranged in age from 16 days to 11 years, with a median age of 1.24 years. Fifty-nine percent were male.

Table 1 shows the susceptibility of penicillin-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae to selected antimicrobials determined by 2002 NCCLS breakpoints. Of the penicillin-nonsusceptible isolates, 0.9% were resistant and 19.2% were intermediate to amoxicillin and 1.5% were resistant and 8.75% were intermediate to ceftriaxone. In contrast, 94% of isolates were nonsusceptible to cefprozil and 99% were nonsusceptible to cefdinir or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. All but one (levofloxacin-intermediate) isolate was susceptible to levofloxacin. Seventy-one percent of isolates were nonsusceptible to erythromycin and azithromycin. While breakpoints for the two ketolides have not been established, for only two strains were the MICs 1 µg/ml (for one strain the MIC was 1 µg/ml to both ketolides, and for one strain the MIC was 2 µg/ml to both ketolides). The MIC at which 50% of strains tested are inhibited (MIC₅₀), MIC₉₀, and the MIC range for all the antibiotics tested against the penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococci can be seen in Table 2. All the penicillin-nonsusceptible isolates of S. pneumoniae were inhibited by the two ketolides cethromycin and telithromycin (MICs of 2.0 µg/ml); 97% were inhibited by cethromycin, and 87% were inhibited by telithromycin at a concentration of 0.125 µg/ml. Amoxicillin and ceftriaxone were the most active ß-lactam antibiotics for penicillin-nonsusceptible isolates. The MIC₉₀s of cefdinir and cefprozil were 16 and 32 µg/ml for penicillin-intermediate and resistant strains, respectively.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Susceptibility to selected antimicrobials of penicillin-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae determined by NCCLS interpretive standards

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Summary of MICsb for penicillin-intermediate and -resistant isolates

Table 3 shows the MIC₉₀ and MIC range for antimicrobials when the isolates were categorized as erythromycin susceptible or nonsusceptible. Seventy one per cent (71%) of these penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococci were nonsusceptible to erythromycin and azithromycin; of these nonsusceptible stains 76% were the M phenotype and 24% were the MLS_B phenotype. Cethromycin and telithromycin also inhibited 100% of erythromycin susceptible isolates at a concentration of 0.125 µg/ml. For erythromycin-nonsusceptible isolates, cethromycin inhibited 97% of isolates at an MIC of 0.125 µg/ml and telithromycin inhibited 83% of isolates at this concentration. Macrolide resistance increased from 44 to 80% in the 6 years of the study during which the isolates were selected; however the proportion of isolates with M or MLS_B phenotypes remained constant over the time period (53 and 18%, respectively).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 3. Summary of MICs for erythromycin-susceptible and -nonsusceptible isolates

A medication history within the 30 days prior to infection was available for 331 of the 333 children (Table 4). Two hundred seventy (82%) had received a prior antibiotic; 190 (70%) had strains that were resistant to a macrolide and or clindamycin. When the children had received a prior ß-lactam alone (n = 178), 67% had a strain that was resistant to a macrolide or clindamycin. Seventy-three (22%) received a macrolide alone or in combination with another antibiotic (in all cases a ß-lactam); 66% of these children had infections caused by strains that were resistant to a macrolide (M phenotype) and 19% of these children had infections resistant to a macrolide and clindamycin (MLS_B phenotype). Prior treatment with a macrolide or clindamycin alone resulted in 94% of isolates causing infections being a macrolide and or clindamycin resistant isolate. No prior specific macrolide (azithromycin, erythromycin, or clarithromycin) resulted in more macrolide resistance or in a more prevalent resistance phenotype. Macrolide resistance and macrolide resistance phenotypes did not correlate with the age of the children with OM. Ninety-seven percent (322 of 333) of the isolates from the middle ear or mastoid were serogroups or serotypes represented in the heptavalent conjugated pneumococcal vaccine.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 4. Effects of antibiotic treatment in the 30 days prior to infection and recovery of macrolide-resistant isolates from patients with middle ear infectiona

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Pneumococcal resistance to the ß-lactam and macrolide antibiotics continues to increase. Doern and colleagues have documented macrolide nonsusceptibility rising from 10.3% in 1994 and 1995 to 26% in 1999 and 2000 in the United States (4). Macrolide resistance among isolates of S. pneumoniae derived from invasive infections increased from16 to 32% between 1994 and 1999 in Atlanta, Ga.; however, the prevalence of the MLS_B phenotype remained stable over the 6 years of the study (7). Clindamycin therapy of AOM caused by S. pneumoniae in the presence of macrolide resistance remains a viable alternative in the United States, because the predominant mechanism of macrolide resistance is the macrolide efflux pump (M phenotype), in contrast to Europe, where the MLS_B phenotype predominates (2, 6, 8). Cethromycin is a new ketolide with in vitro antibacterial activity against many gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria causing respiratory infections (3). The ketolides are active in vitro (MIC 4 µg/ml) against erythromycin-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae (3), regardless of the macrolide resistance mechanism (8). In children, pneumococcal antibiotic resistance is more prevalent in isolates obtained from the middle ear compared to systemic isolates, making therapy with an oral agent more difficult. Using middle ear isolates that were selected for penicillin nonsusceptibility, we were able to test the in vitro performance of the ketolides and compare them to other antibiotics used in therapy of OM. It should be noted that the poor activity of cefdinir and cefprozil in this study, compared to other published data (4), is due, in large part, to the selection of penicillin-intermediate strains for which the MICs were high (0.5 and 1.0 µg/ml).

Several studies have linked macrolide use with increased isolation of macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae, but these studies were not designed to establish actual treatment with a specific antibiotic prior to infection (1, 7, 14). Prior antibiotic therapy with any agent is a known risk factor for isolation of a penicillin-resistant pneumococcus (11), and penicillin resistance is often linked to resistance to macrolides, tetracyclines, and chloramphenicol (2). We were able to ascertain the specific antimicrobial used in prior therapy (within 30 days) and correlate it with the isolation of pneumococci resistant to macrolides. The pneumococci for this study were picked for nonsusceptibility to penicillin, and accordingly, macrolide resistance was expected to be high. However, it was surprising to see that prior macrolide therapy, or macrolide therapy in combination with a ß-lactam, was associated with recovery of, respectively, only 15 or 6% of macrolide-susceptible isolates causing OM.

 
This study was funded in part by grants from Abbott Laboratories and Roche Laboratories.

We thank Jennifer Probst for technical support and also acknowledge Andrea Forbes, Michelene Ortenzo, and Bev Petrities, CCRC, without whose help we could not have performed the study.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (832) 824-4330. Fax: (832) 825-4347. E-mail: emason{at}bcm.tmc.edu.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1
1. Baquero, F. 1999. Evolving resistance patterns of Streptococcus pneumoniae: a link with long-acting macrolide consumption? J. Chemother. 11(Suppl. 1):35-43.
2
2. Baquero, F., J. A. García-Rodríguez, J. G. De Lomas, L. Aguilar, and The Spanish Surveillance Group for Respiratory Pathogens. 1999. Antimicrobial resistance of 1,113 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from patients with respiratory tract infections in Spain: results of a 1-year (1996-1997) multicenter surveillance study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:357-359.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3
3. Davies, T. A., L. M. Ednie, D. M. Hoellman, G. A. Pankuch, M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 2000. Antipneumococcal activity of ABT-773 compared to those of 10 other agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1894-1899.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Doern, G. V., K. P. Heilmann, H. K. Huynh, P. R. Rhomberg, S. L. Coffman, and A. B. Brueggemann. 2001. Antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States during 1999-2000, including a comparison of resistance rates since 1994-1995. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1721-1729.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Doern, G. V., M. A. Pfaller, K. Kugler, J. Freeman, and R. N. Jones. 1998. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among respiratory tract isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in North America: 1997 results from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program. Clin. Infect. Dis. 27:764-770.[Medline]
6
6. Fitoussi, F., C. Doit, P. Geslin, N. Brahimi, and E. Bingen. 2001. Mechanisms of macrolide resistance in clinical pneumococcal isolates in France. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:636-638.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7
7. Gay, K., W. Baughman, Y. Miller, D. Jackson, C. G. Whitney, A. Schuchat, M. M. Farley, F. Tenover, and D. S. Stephens. 2000. The emergence of Streptococcus pneumoniae resistant to macrolide antimicrobial agents: a 6-year population-based assessment. J. Infect. Dis. 182:1417-1424.[CrossRef][Medline]
8
8. Hoban, D. J., A. K. Wierzbowski, K. Nichol, and G. G. Zhanel. 2001. Macrolide-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Canada during 1998-1999: prevalence of mef(A) and erm(B) and susceptibilities to ketolides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:2147-2150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Hyde, T. B., K. Gay, D. S. Stephens, D. J. Vugia, M. Pass, S. Johnson, N. L. Barrett, W. Schaffner, P. R. Cieslak, P. S. Maupin, E. R. Zell, J. H. Jorgensen, R. R. Facklam, and C. G. Whitney. 2001. Macrolide resistance among invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 286:1857-1862.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10
10. Kaplan, S. L., E. O. Mason, Jr., E. R. Wald, T. Q. Tan, G. E. Schutze, J. S. Bradley, L. B. Givner, K. S. Kim, R. Yogev, and W. J. Barson. 2001. Six-year multicenter surveillance of invasive pneumococcal infections in children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.
11
11. Kaplan, S. L., E. O. Mason, Jr., W. J. Barson, E. R. Wald, M. Arditi, T. Q. Tan, G. E. Schutze, J. S. Bradley, L. B. Givner, K. S. Kim, and R. Yogev. 1998. Three-year multicenter surveillance of systemic pneumococcal infections in children. Pediatrics 102:538-545.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12
12. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2002. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twelfth informational supplement. NCCLS document M100-S12. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
13
13. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 5th ed., vol. 17, no. 2. Approved standard-M7-A4. NCCLS document M7-A4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
14
14. Pihlajamaki, M., P. Kotilainen, T. Kaurila, T. Klaukka, E. Palva, and P. Huovinen. 2001. Macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and use of antimicrobial agents. Clin. Infect. Dis. 33:483-488.[CrossRef][Medline]
15
15. Waites, K., C. Johnson, B. Gray, K. Edwards, M. Crain, and W. Benjamin, Jr. 2000. Use of clindamycin disks to detect macrolide resistance mediated by ermB and mefE in Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from adults and children. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1731-1734.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16
16. Wald, E. R., E. O. Mason, Jr., J. S. Bradley, W. J. Barson, S. L. Kaplan, et al. 2001. Acute otitis media caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae in children's hospitals between 1994 and 1997. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 20:34-39.[CrossRef][Medline]

---

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2003, p. 166-169, Vol. 47, No. 1
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.1.166-169.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Conte, J. E. Jr., Golden, J. A., Kipps, J., Zurlinden, E. (2004). Steady-State Plasma and Intrapulmonary Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cethromycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 3508-3515 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Reinert, R. R. (2004). Clinical efficacy of ketolides in the treatment of respiratory tract infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 53: 918-927 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Labro, M. T., Abdelghaffar, H., Babin-Chevaye, C. (2004). Interaction of the New Ketolide ABT-773 (Cethromycin) with Human Polymorphonuclear Neutrophils and the Phagocytic Cell Line PLB-985 In Vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 1096-1104 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jorgensen, J. H., Crawford, S. A., McElmeel, M. L., Whitney, C. G. (2004). Activities of Cethromycin and Telithromycin against Recent North American Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 605-607 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mason, E. O. Articles by Kaplan, S. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mason, E. O., Jr. Articles by Kaplan, S. L.