Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2003, p. 375-377, Vol. 47, No. 1
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.1.375-377.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Laboratory of Bacterial Pathogenesis, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York
Received 17 June 2002/ Returned for modification 20 July 2002/ Accepted 21 September 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
We recently proposed a first substance that is able to accomplish this task: Pal, an enzyme from a pneumococcal bacteriophage that can specifically digest any pneumococcal cell wall within seconds, resulting in rapid death of the organism (4). Several such enzymes are known for pneumococcal bacteriophage and are classified into two groups, namely, amidases, which cleave the peptidoglycan between N-acetylmuramic acid and L-alanine, and lysozymes, which cleave the glycosidic bond between N-acetylmuramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine (3). Cleavage with either of these enzymes results in a weakening in the cell wall, which leads to the externalization of the cytoplasmic membrane and ultimate lysis. We describe here the killing efficacy of a combination of Pal, an amidase with a molecular mass of 34 kDa, and Cpl-1, a phage lysozyme with a molecular mass of 39 kDa, in vitro. Both enzymes have very different N-terminal catalytic sites and share a similar C-terminal cell wall attachment site, which binds to choline in both cases. We set out to test whether the simultaneous use of both enzymes is competitive and therefore antagonistic or simply additive, or whether it may actually enhance the destruction of the cell wall and hence show synergistic lytic action.
Escherichia coli DH5
(pMSP11) expressing Pal and double-stranded DNA from the pneumococcal phage Cp-1 were obtained from R. Lopez (9). Cpl-1-expressing E. coli DH5
(pJML6) was constructed as follows. The Cpl-1 gene was amplified from Cp-1 total phage DNA with a primer pair designed according to the published GenBank sequence number Z47794, flanked by XbaI and HindIII restriction sites, transcriptional start and stop codons, and a ribosomal binding site. To use the same powerful expression system as that used for Pal, which is based on the construct pIN-IIIA and contains a double promoter, we digested the plasmid pMSP11 with XbaI and HindIII, which removes the entire inserted Pal gene (5, 9). The PCR product was subcloned to pMSP11 by using the XbaI and HindIII recognition sites to produce the pJML6 construct. E. coli DH5
(pMSP11) and DH5
(pJML6) were grown in Luria-Bertani broth and induced with lactose overnight. Harvest and purification of the enzymes are described elsewhere (4). Both enzymes were stored and assayed in enzyme buffer (50 mM phosphate buffer [pH 7.0] containing 1 mM dithiothreitol and 1 mM EDTA). Activity was measured by exposing S. pneumoniae strain DCC 1490 (serogroup 14), grown to log phase and resuspended in sterile saline, to equal volumes of serial twofold dilutions of the enzymes for 15 min in a microtiter plate. The reciprocal of the highest dilution that decreased the optical density by half (from a starting point of 0.5) was defined as the activity in units per milliliter. The specific activity of a freshly produced and purified batch for both enzymes is approximately 1 U/µg.
First we performed time-kill experiments with very short exposures, since the killing of both enzymes can be observed within seconds and a typical application in the nasopharynx would be unique and short. All pneumococcal strains were obtained from A. Tomasz (8). Mid-log-phase cultures of S. pneumoniae strains DCC 1355, DCC 1490, DCC 1494, DCC 1335, and DCC 1420 (serotypes 19, 14, 14, 9V, and 23F, respectively, of which the latter three are highly penicillin resistant) were pelleted and resuspended to an absorbance at 600 nm of 1.0 (approximately 109 CFU/ml). One hundred fifty microliters of Pal or Cpl-1 at a final concentration of 1 U/ml, or a mixture of both at a concentration of 0.5 U/ml (each), was added to 150 µl of the bacterial solution. Colony counts were performed after 30 s and 10 min and compared to a control exposed to enzyme buffer only, by serially diluting a 10-µl aliquot in saline and plating it on 5% Columbia blood agar, with a detection limit of 104 CFU/ml.
In 30 s, 1 U of Pal per ml reduced the bacterial titer of the four strains by a median of 1.34 log10 CFU/ml (range, 0.38 to 1.81 log10 CFU/ml), while Cpl-1 at 1 U/ml reduced the titers by 0.83 log10 CFU/ml (range, 0.52 to 1.31 log10 CFU/ml). The combination of both enzymes reduced the titers by 2.40 log10 CFU/ml (range, 0.98 to 3.34 log10 CFU/ml) (Fig. 1). After 10 min, the medians and ranges of reduction in log10 CFU/ml were 1.99 (0.73 to 2.54), 1.44 (1.32 to 2.65), and 3.15 (2.50 to 5.28) for Pal, Cpl-1, and the combination, respectively. In other words, mixing 0.5 U of each enzyme/ml increased killing efficacy by a median log10 CFU/ml of 1.07 (at 30 s) to 1.31 (at 10 min) relative to Pal alone and by log10 1.58 to 1.72 (30 s and 10 min) relative to Cpl-1 alone. By one-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni posttest for the comparison of the three treatment groups, the killing efficacy of the combination of enzymes was always significantly higher than that of both single enzymes (P < 0.05) at both time points, except for that of strain DCC 1494 at 30 s.
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Killing of five strains of S. pneumoniae with 1-U/ml concentrations of Pal, Cpl-1, or a combination of both in 30 s. The combination of the two enzymes shows more than additive killing on a logarithmic scale. Open bar, DCC 1335; hatched bar, DCC 1355; stippled bar, DCC 1420; filled bar, DCC 1494; and cross-hatched bar, DCC 1490.
|
2 log10 CFU/ml more than that by the single most active agent. Figure 2 illustrates the results, which show synergy for both strains.
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Time-kill curves for S. pneumoniae strains DCC 1355 (A) and DCC 1494 (B) with Pal (filled circles), Cpl-1 (open circles), and a combination of both (asterisks) at 0.25 times the MIC of each (12.5-U/ml concentrations of Pal and Cpl-1 for DCC 1355 and 12.5 U of Pal/ml and 6.25 U of Cpl-1/ml for DCC 1494).
|
FIC) was calculated. A
FIC of
0.5 was interpreted as synergy. The MICs were 50 to 200 U/ml for Pal and 25 to 50 U/ml for Cpl-1 in all tested strains. Transcription of the enzyme concentrations along the inhibitory line on the microtiter plate into an isobologram revealed curves with a shape characteristic of synergy. The results for strains DCC 1490 and DCC 1355 are shown in Fig. 3. The
FIC for all strains was
0.5.
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Isobologram of the checkerboard synergy testing method, showing results for S. pneumoniae strains DCC 1490 and DCC 1355. For each well along the inhibitory line, enzyme concentrations (fractions of the enzymes' MICs) were entered in an x/y plot. Error bars show standard errors of means. The two dashed lines illustrate theoretical curves.
|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»