Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2003, p. 432-435, Vol. 47, No. 1
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.1.432-435.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Lincomycin Resistance Mutations in Two Regions Immediately Downstream of the -10 Region of lmr Promoter Cause Overexpression of a Putative Multidrug Efflux Pump in Bacillus subtilis Mutants
Miyuki Kumano,1 Masaya Fujita,2 Kouji Nakamura,1 Makiko Murata,3 Reiko Ohki,3 and Kunio Yamane1*
Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki 305-8572,1
Department of Molecular Biology, School of Health Sciences, Kyorin University, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 192-8508, Japan,3
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 023482
Received 16 May 2002/
Returned for modification 16 July 2002/
Accepted 3 October 2002

ABSTRACT
We isolated 19 lincomycin-resistant
Bacillus subtilis mutants
by expressing
lmrB encoding a putative multidrug efflux protein.
Eighteen of the mutants altered at two regions (-3 to -1 and
+15) immediately downstream of the -10 region of the
lmr promoter
increased
lmr transcription in vivo and in vitro.

TEXT
Bacteria can become resistant to various drugs and chemicals
through the expression of genes for membrane-spanning drug efflux
transporters (
9,
10). Many genes for drug transporters form
operons with additional genes that are transcriptional regulators,
such as
Bacillus subtilis bmr/bmrR (
1) and
Escherichia coli emrAB/emrR (
7). We reported that the
lmr operon consists of
lmrA and
lmrB in
B. subtilis (Fig.
1A) and that the
lin-
2 mutation,
which confers lincomycin resistance on
B. subtilis 1A221, arises
by replacing two nucleotides (A and G at positions -1 and +15
replaced with C and T, respectively) immediately downstream
of the predicted -10 region of the
lmr promoter (
6). LmrA should
be a transcriptional regulator as it has a DNA-binding motif
like that of TetR (
2), and LmrB should be a drug efflux pump
as it has two conserved sequence motifs for translocation (
8)
and for drug extrusion (
4).
We examined whether these nucleotide changes affect levels of
transcription of the
lmr genes in 1A221 by using Northern hybridization.
Total
B. subtilis 168 and 1A221 RNAs (10 µg) were resolved
in 1.5% agarose gels containing 2.2 M formaldehyde and then
transferred to Gene Screen Plus nylon membranes (NEN Life Science
Products) as described by Sambrook et al. (
11). We detected
lmrA and
lmrB mRNA by using labeled probes (probe A for
lmrA and probe B for
lmrB in Fig.
1A and B) with the digoxigenin
(DIG) system (Roche Diagnostics). To prepare DIG-labeled RNA
probes for
lmrA and
lmrB, 309 bp of
lmrA fragments and 319 bp
of
lmrB fragments near the regions of both genes encoding the
NH
2 termini of the gene products were amplified by PCR with
specific oligonucleotide pairs PR1 (5'-gcgcaagcttATGGAGATTCCCGTGAGAAA-3')
and PR2 (5'-gccgagatctCCCACAGGCAAGCCTTCAAT-3') and PR3 (5'-gcgcaagcttAGCAATACAAAGTGATGCCG-3')
and PR4 (5'-gccgagatctAAGTGCCTGAACGATCCTTG-3'), respectively.
These primers contain linker DNA for
HindIII or
BglII sites
(linker regions are in lowercase). The PCR products were digested
with
HindIII and
BglII and inserted into pGEM-3Zf(+) (Promega)
cleaved by
HindIII and
BamHI within its multicloning site. Inserted
fragments were reamplified by PCR with the pGEM flanking region
containing the T7 promoter by using primers PR5 (5'-GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACG-3')
and PR6 (5'-GAATTGTGAGCGGATAAC-3'). Purified PCR products (100
ng) were digested with
HindIII and used as templates for DIG
labeling by transcription with T7 RNA polymerase. After the
reaction was stopped, products were precipitated with 75% cold
ethanol, dried, and dissolved in water treated with diethyl
pyrocarbonate, and 20 to 100 ng was used as hybridization probes.
Probe detection was performed according to the manufacturer's
instructions (Roche Diagnostics). Probe A detected 2.2- and
0.7-kb bands throughout all growth stages of 1A221 (Fig.
1B,
b), and probe B identified a major 2.2-kb band (Fig.
1B, c),
confirming that
lmrA and
lmrB form an operon. In addition,
lmrA was solely transcribed as 0.7-kb RNA. In contrast, neither probe
A nor probe B detected transcripts in 168. These results indicated
that the
lin-
2 mutation causes a high level of
lmr transcription
in 1A221 during both the exponential and stationary growth phases.
We further isolated and characterized 19 spontaneous lincomycin-resistant mutants that expressed lmrB. Fifty-four colonies were isolated from 1010 cells of B. subtilis 168 spread on 50 Luria-Bertani agar plates with 100 µg of lincomycin/ml at 37°C for 12 h. Nineteen strains that were positive for the lmrB gene were selected by dot blot Northern hybridization using probe B. Sequencing the promoter and lmrA region showed that, in 18 of the mutants, none of the nucleotides comprising the lmrA coding region was altered. However, we located an alteration at the lmrA termination codon (TAA to TCA coding Ser) in one mutant. Figure 2 aligns and compares the sequences of -10 and downstream regions in the 18 mutants with those of 168 and 1A221. Nucleotide alterations in all of these mutants were localized at the -3 to -1 region and/or the +15 position immediately downstream of the -10 region. Two nucleotides corresponding to -3 and -2 were deleted from LR 45. Mutants LR 8, 9, 22, 26, and 31, each harboring a mutation at -3 and/or -2 where C was replaced with G or A, were highly resistant to lincomycin. The single replacement of G at position +15 with T in LR 12, 25, 32, and 37 and of A at position -1 with C or T in LR 4, 14, 19, 44, 46, 49, 52, and 54 caused a low level of lincomycin resistance. Deleting the two nucleotides in LR 45 resulted in A, G, T, and T at positions -3, -2, -1, and +15, respectively, and high resistance to lincomycin. Amplified PCR fragments containing the mutated nucleotides from each mutant reproducibly conferred lincomycin resistance on the wild type by DNA-mediated transformation.
We defined the 5' termini of the 2.2- and 0.7-kb transcripts
(Fig.
1) by using total RNA at the mid-log phase of growth from
168, 1A221, and six mutants (LR 26, 31, 32, 44, 45, and 52;
representatives of each group in Fig.
2) by primer extension
analysis as described previously (
5). The transcriptional initiation
sites (G at +1) in five of the mutants and in 1A221 were identical.
In contrast, the product for the deletion mutant, LR 45, was
2 nucleotides shorter than that for 1A221, which had a C residue
at the site (Fig.
2). These results indicated that the 5' termini
of the 2.2- and 0.7-kb transcripts are identical and that the
distance from -10 to the initiation site in LR 45 is identical
to those in 1A221 and the other five mutants. The mutant LR
9 was not examined because it contained a double mutation.
Many multidrug efflux systems contain a characteristic cis-acting regulatory element in the promoter. The inverted repeat· ·· sequence 5'-AATCAAGATAATAGACCAGTCACTATATT· TTTGATT-3' (dots and boldface characters indicate the mutation sites and the sequence for -10, respectively; inverted-repeat sequences are underlined) is located at the -10 and downstream regions of the promoter. Therefore, LmrA might regulate promoter activity by directly or indirectly binding to this DNA region. If LmrA is involved in the control of lmr transcription by interacting with this region, mutations causing lmr expression should occur at high frequency in the lmrA coding region because lmrA is approximately 20 times longer (546 bp) than the promoter site. However, the lmrA coding region was changed at the termination codon in only one mutant. We then examined the effects of mutations at the -10 region on the transcription activity of the lmr gene. We measured the promoter activity of 168, 1A221, and lincomycin-resistant mutants by in vitro transcription with a reconstructed E
A holoenzyme and DNA fragments containing promoter regions as described previously (3). We found that mutations increased lmr promoter activity 3- to 20-fold over that of 168. Therefore, mutations at one or at both sites also increased lmr promoter activity in vitro, and lmr operon expression cannot be evoked solely by LmrA binding to the promoter regions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific
Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and
Culture of Japan.
We thank N. Foster for critical reading of the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan. Phone: 81-298-53-6680. Fax: 81-298-53-6680. E-mail:
kyamane{at}sakura.cc.tsukuba.ac.jp.


REFERENCES
1 - Ahmed, M., C. M. Borsch, S. S. Taylor, N. Vazquez-Laslop, and A. A. Neyfakh. 1994. A protein that activates expression of a multidrug efflux transporter upon binding the transporter substrates. J. Biol. Chem. 269:28506-28513.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Aramaki, H., N. Yagi, and M. Suzuki. 1995. Residues important for the function of a multihelical DNA binding domain in the new transcription factor family of Cam and Tet repressors. Protein Eng. 8:1259-1266.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Fujita, M., and Y. Sadaie. 1998. Promoter selectivity of the Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase
A and
H holoenzymes. J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 124:89-97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Griffith, J. K., M. E. Baker, D. A. Rouch, M. G. Page, R. A. Skurray, I. T. Paulsen, K. F. Chater, S. A. Baldwin, and P. J. Henderson. 1992. Membrane transport proteins: implications of sequence comparisons. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 4:684-695.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - Kakeshita, H., A. Oguro, R. Amikura, K. Nakamura, and K. Yamane. 2000. Expression of the ftsY gene, encoding a homologue of the alpha subunit of mammalian signal recognition particle receptor, is controlled by different promoters in vegetative and sporulating cells of Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology 146:2595-2603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Kumano, M., A. Tamakoshi, and K. Yamane. 1997. A 32 kb nucleotide sequence from the region of the lincomycin-resistance gene (22°-25°) of the Bacillus subtilis chromosome and identification of the site of the lin-2 mutation. Microbiology 143:2775-2782.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Lomovskaya. O., K. Lewis, and A. Matin. 1995. EmrR is a negative regulator of the Escherichia coli multidrug resistance pump EmrAB. J. Bacteriol. 177:2328-2334.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Marger, M., and M. H. Saier, Jr. 1993. A major superfamily of transmembrane facilitators that catalyse uniport, symport and antiport. Trends Biochem. Sci. 18:13-20.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - Markham, P. N., and A. A. Neyfakh. 2001. Efflux-mediated drug resistance in Gram-positive bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 4:509-514.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Saier, M. H., Jr., I. T. Paulsen, M. K. Sliwinski, S. S. Pao, R. A. Skurray, and H. Nikaido. 1998. Evolutionary origins of multidrug and drug-specific efflux pumps in bacteria. FASEB J. 12:265-274.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2003, p. 432-435, Vol. 47, No. 1
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.1.432-435.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Hirooka, K., Kunikane, S., Matsuoka, H., Yoshida, K.-I., Kumamoto, K., Tojo, S., Fujita, Y.
(2007). Dual Regulation of the Bacillus subtilis Regulon Comprising the lmrAB and yxaGH Operons and yxaF Gene by Two Transcriptional Repressors, LmrA and YxaF, in Response to Flavonoids. J. Bacteriol.
189: 5170-5182
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Poole, K.
(2005). Efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother
56: 20-51
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ramos, J. L., Martinez-Bueno, M., Molina-Henares, A. J., Teran, W., Watanabe, K., Zhang, X., Gallegos, M. T., Brennan, R., Tobes, R.
(2005). The TetR Family of Transcriptional Repressors. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
69: 326-356
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lin, J. T., Connelly, M. B., Amolo, C., Otani, S., Yaver, D. S.
(2005). Global Transcriptional Response of Bacillus subtilis to Treatment with Subinhibitory Concentrations of Antibiotics That Inhibit Protein Synthesis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 1915-1926
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yoshida, K.-i., Ohki, Y.-h., Murata, M., Kinehara, M., Matsuoka, H., Satomura, T., Ohki, R., Kumano, M., Yamane, K., Fujita, Y.
(2004). Bacillus subtilis LmrA Is a Repressor of the lmrAB and yxaGH Operons: Identification of Its Binding Site and Functional Analysis of lmrB and yxaGH. J. Bacteriol.
186: 5640-5648
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Huang, J., O'Toole, P. W., Shen, W., Amrine-Madsen, H., Jiang, X., Lobo, N., Palmer, L. M., Voelker, L., Fan, F., Gwynn, M. N., McDevitt, D.
(2004). Novel Chromosomally Encoded Multidrug Efflux Transporter MdeA in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 909-917
[Abstract]
[Full Text]