Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2003, p. 3067-3072, Vol. 47, No. 10
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.10.3067-3072.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Antibiotic-Dependent Induction of Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E TtgABC Efflux Pump Is Mediated by the Drug Binding Repressor TtgR
Wilson Terán, Antonia Felipe, Ana Segura, Antonia Rojas, Juan-Luis Ramos,* and María-Trinidad Gallegos
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Department of Plant Biochemistry, Molecular and Cellular Biology, Granada, Spain
Received 19 May 2003/
Returned for modification 13 June 2003/
Accepted 8 July 2003

ABSTRACT
Pseudomonas putida is well known for its metabolic capabilities,
but recently, it has been shown to exhibit resistance to a wide
range of antibiotics. In
P. putida DOT-T1E, the TtgABC efflux
pump, which has a broad substrate specificity, extrudes antibiotics
such as ampicillin, carbenicillin, tetracycline, nalidixic acid,
and chloramphenicol. We have analyzed the expression of the
ttgABC efflux pump operon and its regulatory gene,
ttgR, in
response to several structurally unrelated antibiotics at the
transcriptional level and investigated the role of the TtgR
protein in this process.
ttgABC and
ttgR are expressed in vivo
at a moderate basal level, which increases in the presence of
hydrophobic antibiotics like chloramphenicol and tetracycline.
In vitro experiments show that, in the absence of inducers,
TtgR binds to a palindromic operator site which overlaps both
ttgABC and
ttgR promoters and dissociates from it in the presence
of chloramphenicol and tetracycline. These results suggest that
the TtgR repressor is able to bind to structurally different
antibiotics, which allows induction of TtgABC multidrug efflux
pump expression in response to these antimicrobial agents. This
is the first case in which the expression of a drug transporter
of the resistance-nodulation-division family has been shown
to be regulated directly by antibiotics.

INTRODUCTION
The increasing antibiotic resistance in bacteria is creating
a critical situation that may reverse the enormous medical gains
experienced with the use of effective antibiotics. Resistance
can be caused by diverse mechanisms involving decreased antibiotic
accumulation, physical modification or destruction of the antibiotics,
and alteration of the enzyme target of these agents. In recent
years, a mechanism of resistance involving the active efflux
of antibiotics by pumps has been elucidated. These efflux systems
are broadly specific and able to accommodate a variety of structurally
unrelated antimicrobial agents, such as antibiotics, biocides,
dyes, detergents, fatty acids, and organic solvents (
18,
26,
27,
30,
33).
Efflux systems capable of transporting multiple antimicrobials fall into six classes: the major facilitator superfamily, the ATP-binding cassette family, the resistance-nodulation-division (RND) family, the small multidrug resistance family (which is itself a member of the drug-metabolite transporter superfamily), the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion family, and the multidrug endosomal transporter family (37). The members of the RND family are the most relevant in respect to resistance to clinically important agents (30). Originally thought to be limited to gram-negative bacteria, members of the RND family have now been identified in all major kingdoms (44). In gram-negative microorganisms, RND transporters work in conjunction with a periplasmic membrane fusion protein (MFP) and an outer membrane protein, now called outer membrane factor (OMF) (47), which facilitates the removal of antibiotics from the periplasm or the outer leaflet of the inner membrane (7, 25, 43). RND/MFP/OMF-type multidrug efflux systems have been described in various microorganisms including Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas putida, Burkholderia spp., Campylobacter jejuni, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (19, 30, 41, 47). The range and number of agents extruded vary from organism to organism, even for pumps with high degrees of amino acid sequence similarity, promoting resistance to a range of clinically relevant antimicrobials. Expression of the majority of the bacterial drug transporter genes is controlled by transcriptional regulatory proteins, either repressors or activators, that are often located upstream from efflux pump operons (12). Some of them (i.e., BmrR [45, 48], EmrR [5, 20], QacR [39, 40], and TetR [16, 28, 29]) are able to bind to substrates of their cognate multidrug transporters and promote an increase in their expression. The drug-binding properties of these well-described bacterial efflux pump regulators have provided new insights into the protein-drug recognition field and, thus, in the design of new and more effective ways to overcome this mechanism of resistance.
Strains of the species P. putida are well known for their metabolic capabilities, but recently, their mechanisms of resistance to a wide range of antibiotics and organic solvents have become the object of study (6, 17, 32, 33). In P. putida strain DOT-T1E, three homologous efflux pumps belonging to the RND family of bacterial transporters (TtgABC, TtgDEF, and TtgGHI) are involved in solvent tolerance (6, 24, 35). Although these pumps are 70% identical at the protein level, they exhibit significant differences in substrate specificity, and so TtgABC and TtgGHI extrude antibiotics as well as solvents. Only the TtgABC efflux pump has been shown to be essential for the antibiotic resistance of this strain, as a ttgB-knockout mutant experienced a significant decrease in resistance to an ample variety of antibiotics (6, 32, 35). On the other hand, the ttgGHI operon is expressed at high levels regardless of the growth conditions, and its expression is not increased in response to antibiotics in the culture medium (36). Divergent with respect to these structural genes are the putative regulatory genes: ttgR for ttgABC and an operon, ttgVW, in the case of the ttgGHI genes (6, 35, 36). TtgR and TtgV downregulate the expression of ttgABC (6) and ttgGHI (36), respectively, but the role of the ttgW gene product in the control of expression of ttgGHI remains to be determined.
Given that TtgABC has been shown to extrude multiple antibiotics, we decided to analyze the expression of this pump at the transcriptional level in response to the antibiotics that the pump extrudes. We observed that, among the antibiotics tested, chloramphenicol and tetracycline were able to induce the expression of the ttgABC efflux pump and its regulatory gene, ttgR, and showed that TtgR is a drug-binding repressor involved in the antibiotic induction of this multidrug efflux pump.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and culture medium.
The bacterial strain used in this study was
P. putida DOT-T1E
(
31). This strain was routinely grown in liquid Luria-Bertani
(LB) medium at 30°C (
38). Antibiotics were added to the
culture medium to reach final concentrations of 20 µg/ml
for rifampin and 20 µg/ml for tetracycline. We constructed
fusions of the promoters of the
ttgABC and
ttgR operons to a
promoterless
lacZ gene in the low-copy-number (two to four copies
per cell) pMP220 vector (
42). The
ttgR-
ttgA intergenic region
(300 bp) was amplified by PCR from
P. putida DOT-T1E chromosomal
DNA, which was isolated as described by Ausubel et al. (
4) with
primers incorporating
EcoRI and
PstI restriction sites (primer
TTGAEcoRI [5'-CCGGAATTCGTGCGGGGAAC-3'] and primer TTGAPstI [5'-AAAACTGCAGTAATGGAAGAG-3'])
to create a fusion of the promoters of the
ttgABC operon to
'
lacZ and with primers TTGREcoRI (5'-CCCGGAATTCAAGAGTAATGGA-3')
and TTGRPstI (5'-AAAACTGCAGCGCGTGCGG-3') to create a fusion
of the
ttgR promoter to '
lacZ. PCRs (50 µl) were carried
out with 2.5 U of
Taq polymerase (Amersham-Pharmacia) and consisted
of 1
x PCR buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.3], 50 mM KCl), 0.2 µM
each primer, 0.8 mM each deoxynucleoside triphosphates (Roche),
and about 100 ng of template DNA. Cycling parameters were 2
min of incubation at 96°C, followed by 30 cycles of 96°C
for 1 min, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min, before
finishing with 10 min at 72°C. Upon amplification, DNA was
digested with
EcoRI and
PstI and ligated to
EcoRI
-PstI-digested
pMP220 to produce pED14 (P
ttgA::
lacZ) and pED13 (P
ttgR::
lacZ).
Plasmids pED13 and pED14 were sequenced to make sure that no
mutations were introduced in the corresponding promoter regions.
These plasmids were electroporated in
P. putida DOT-T1E as described
by Enderle and Farwell (
8). Cells in 0.2-cm cuvettes were submitted
to a high-voltage pulse (3,000 V) for 5 ms by using a MicroPulser
electroporation apparatus (Bio-Rad), and transformants were
selected in LB agar plates supplemented with tetracycline.
DNA techniques.
A Qiaprep spin miniprep kit (Qiagen) was used for plasmid isolation. Both strands of the plasmid DNA were sequenced with universal, reverse, or specifically designed primers by using an automatic DNA sequencer (ABI-PRISM 310; Applied Biosystems, Inc.).
Primer extension analysis.
P. putida DOT-T1E was grown overnight in LB medium. The cells were then diluted 25-fold in fresh medium, and aliquots were incubated in the absence or presence of sublethal concentrations of antibiotics (carbenicillin [120 µg/ml], chloramphenicol [30 µg/ml], gentamicin [0.25 µg/ml], nalidixic acid [30 µg/ml], streptomycin [8 µg/ml], and tetracycline [1 µg/ml]) until the culture reached a turbidity of 1.0 at 660 nm. The cells (30 ml) were pelleted and processed for RNA isolation by the method of Marqués et al. (22). mRNAs of the ttgABC pump operon and its corresponding regulator were reverse transcribed with avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase and a specific oligonucleotide primer complementary to a sequence located 120 to 150 nucleotides from the transcription start point of each gene (primer TtgA1 [5'-GAGCGGTAACGGCTGGCTTG-3'] and primer TtgR1 [5'-CTTCTTCTTTGGTTCGACGGA-3'] for ttgABC and ttgR, respectively). As an internal control, the mRNA of the constantly expressed rpoS gene was also reverse transcribed with primer RpoS5 (5'-CAGCAATCGACTGCCC-3'). Oligonucleotides were end labeled with [
-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase, and 0.5 to 1 pmol was annealed to 20 µg of total RNA for 5 min at 90°C, followed by 5 min at 65°C. cDNA was synthesized by using avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (1 h at 44°C) and analyzed in urea-polyacrylamide sequencing gels (4, 22). The relative intensities of the bands were quantified by using a Molecular Imager system (GS525 equipment; Bio-Rad). The results presented here are representative of five independent experiments.
ß-Galactosidase assays.
Bacterial cells were inoculated from fresh LB agar plates that had been supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics and in which the bacteria were allowed to grow overnight at 30°C. The cultures were diluted 100-fold in fresh LB medium without or with inducing antibiotics at the same concentrations used for the primer extension experiments and were then incubated at 30°C with shaking until the culture reached a turbidity of 1.0 at 660 nm, and ß-galactosidase activity was determined as described by Miller (23). Tetracycline was used to maintain the plasmids; thus, tetracycline induction of the lacZ fusions could not be assessed. The results presented here are the means of eight different experiments.
Overexpression and purification of TtgR.
A 651-bp fragment containing the ttgR gene was amplified from P. putida DOT-T1E chromosomal DNA by PCR with primers TtgR5'NdeI (5'-NNNNNNCATATGGTCCGTCGAACCAAAG-3') and TtgR3'XhoI (5'-NNNNNNCTCGAGTTTGCGCAGAGCCGGGCTC-3'), which generated NdeI and XhoI restriction sites, respectively. PCRs were carried out as described above. After digestion with these restriction enzymes, the PCR products were ligated into vector pET29a(+) (Novagen), which had previously been digested with NdeI and XhoI. The resulting plasmid, pTGF1, contained the ttgR-coding sequence in frame with a DNA sequence encoding a His6 tag at its 3' end.
For TtgR-His6 purification, pTGF1 was transformed into E. coli B834(DE3). The cells were grown in several 1-liter batches at 30°C in 2x YT culture medium (38) with 50 µg of kanamycin per ml to an A660 between 0.5 and 0.7 and then induced with 1 mM isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside. Cells were harvested after 3 h of induction at 20°C, resuspended in 25 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0)-0.5 M NaCl-5% (vol/vol) glycerolprotease inhibitor cocktail (Complete; Roche), and broken by treatment with 20 µg of lysozyme per ml and a French press. Following centrifugation at 20,000 x g for 30 min, the protein was found to be predominantly (more than 80%) in the soluble fraction. TtgR-His6 was purified by nickel affinity chromatography with a HiTrap chelating Sepharose column (Amersham-Pharmacia) and eluted with an imidazole gradient. Peak fractions were pooled and dialyzed against TGED (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 5% [vol/vol] glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol) to which 50% (vol/vol) glycerol and 50 mM NaCl were added and stored at -70°C (long-term storage) or -20°C (shorter-term storage). Protein concentrations were determined by using the Bio-Rad Protein Assay kit.
Gel mobility shift assays.
The DNA probe was a 189-bp fragment containing the ttgABC-ttgR intergenic region obtained from DOT-T1E chromosomal DNA by PCR with the TtgABC1 (5'-AACGCTCCGGGGGCACC-3') and TtgABC2 (5'-GGGAGACGCTCAAGAG-3') pair of primers. PCRs were carried out as described above; and cycling parameters were 1 min at 96°C, followed by 30 cycles of 96°C for 1 min, 58°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s, before finishing with 5 min at 72°C. The PCR product was isolated from an agarose gel by using the QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen) and was radiolabeled at its 5' ends with [
-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase. The labeled probe (3 nM;
10,000 cpm) was then incubated with 0.75 µM purified TtgR-His6 in 10 µl of TGED supplemented with 8 mM MgCl2, 20 µg of poly(dI-dC) per ml, and 200 µg of bovine serum albumin per ml. When present, chloramphenicol and tetracycline were added to the binding reaction mixture at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1.2 mM. The reaction mixtures were incubated for 10 min at 30°C, and samples were run on 4.5% (wt/vol) native polyacrylamide gels (Mini-Protean II; Bio-Rad) for 2 h at 50 V and room temperature in Tris-glycine buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 200 mM glycine). The results were analyzed by using a Molecular Imager system (GS525 equipment; Bio-Rad).
DNase I footprinting assay.
The DNA probe was the same 189-bp PCR fragment containing the ttgABC-ttgR intergenic region used in the gel mobility shift assays. For the footprint on the top strand, the PCR was carried out with primers TtgABC1 (end labeled with [
-32P]ATP as described above) and TtgABC2. For the footprint on the bottom strand, the same primers were used, but in this case, TtgABC2 was end labeled. Purified labeled probe (10 nM;
104 cpm) was incubated without or with TtgR-His6 (0.75 µM) in 10-µl reaction mixtures consisting of TGED supplemented with 8 mM MgCl2, 20 µg of poly(dI-dC) per ml, and 200 µg of bovine serum albumin per ml. When present, antibiotics (carbenicillin, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, nalidixic acid, streptomycin, and tetracycline) were added to the reaction mixture at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1.5 mM. The reaction mixtures were incubated for 10 min at 30°C before being treated with 40 µl of DNase I, as described previously (36).

RESULTS
Expression of P. putida DOT-T1E TtgABC efflux pump and its regulator, TtgR.
We have analyzed the expression of the
ttgABC efflux pump operon
and the
ttgR gene under different conditions by measuring the
relative amount of mRNA expressed in
P. putida DOT-T1E grown
in the absence and in the presence of several structurally unrelated
antibiotics, such as carbenicillin, chloramphenicol, gentamicin,
nalidixic acid, streptomycin, and tetracycline, which had previously
been reported to be substrates for the TtgABC efflux pump (
6).
We observed increases in the levels of the
ttgABC and the
ttgR mRNAs with respect to the basal level in response to chloramphenicol
(4-fold) and tetracycline (2.6-fold) but did not observe increases
in response to the other antibiotics (see the results for the
ttgABC operon in Fig.
1). We determined the expression of
rpoS as an internal control to ensure that the differences observed
were not due to variability in RNA isolation and/or the primer
extension technique. In
Pseudomonas spp.
rpoS gene expression
is unaltered in the exponential phase under different growth
conditions (
9,
34).
The expression from the
ttgA and
ttgR promoters was also determined
by using fusions of the corresponding promoters to
lacZ in pED14
(P
ttgA::
lacZ) and pED13 (P
ttgR::
lacZ). The levels of expression
of these promoters in the absence of antibiotics were relatively
high (40 ± 2 U for the P
ttgA promoter and 120 ±
10 U for the P
ttgR promoter), but consistent 2.2- to 2.6-fold
increases in the levels of expression of both promoters (105
± 5 U for the P
ttgA promoter and 265 ± 15 U for
the P
ttgR promoter) were observed in response to chloramphenicol
at 30 µg/ml. However, no increase (<1.1-fold) at all
was observed in response to the other antibiotics (data not
shown). Note that because pED13 and pED14 are derivatives of
Tet
r plasmid pMP220, it is not feasible to analyze the induction
mediated by tetracycline. Therefore, the ß-galactosidase
assays validated the mRNA levels. It is also worth noting that
the expression patterns obtained from the
ttgR and
ttgA promoters
were almost identical, which suggests a common mechanism of
regulation for both promoters, also consistent with the fact
that both promoters fully overlap.
TtgABC and TtgR expression are correlated with antibiotic concentration.
As chloramphenicol was the best inducer of the expression of the TtgABC pump, we decided to analyze how the antibiotic dose influenced the expression of the pump and the regulatory gene. We assayed the ß-galactosidase activities from the ttgABC operon and ttgR promoters in wild-type strain DOT-T1E bearing the corresponding promoter fusions on plasmids pED13 and pED14 and grown in the absence and presence of increasing sublethal concentrations of chloramphenicol (6) (Fig. 2). We observed a parallel increase in the levels of expression of both the pump and the regulator with increasing concentrations of chloramphenicol, which suggests that the antibiotic induction is dose dependent and confirms that both operons are regulated in the same way. Therefore, in P. putida DOT-T1E, the expression of ttgABC and its regulatory gene, ttgR, seems to be correlated with cell antibiotic exposure.
TtgR binds to the ttgABC-ttgR intergenic region and is released in the presence of chloramphenicol and tetracycline.
It had been reported previously that the efflux pump operon
is negatively regulated by the adjacent
ttgR gene product, as
the basal level of
ttgABC expression exhibited a 6- to 10-fold
increase in a
ttgR-knockout mutant. In this mutant, the basal
level of activity of the
ttgR promoter was also much higher
than that in the wild-type background (
6). According to these
observations, we expected that an increase in TtgR expression
would inhibit transcription from both the
ttgABC and the
ttgR promoters. However, we have shown here that the levels of expression
of both the efflux pump and TtgR are enhanced by the presence
of certain antibiotics (Fig.
1 and
2), which could be achieved
only if the effectors that induce transcription from those promoters
have a direct effect on TtgR repressor function. This prompted
us to purify the protein and to study in vitro the effect of
chloramphenicol and tetracycline in TtgR binding to the
ttgABC-ttgR intergenic region.
Gel mobility shift assays were carried out to show that TtgR binds specifically to a DNA fragment from position +91 of ttgR to position +68 of ttgABC, corresponding to the ttgR-ttgABC intergenic region (Fig. 3). It should be noted that only excess unlabeled intergenic competitor DNA and not excess control unspecific DNA was able to partially titrate out TtgR from its target DNA in gel mobility shift binding reactions (data not shown). Moreover, as for the in vivo induction of expression, chloramphenicol and tetracycline were able to show an in vitro effect on the binding of TtgR to the ttgABC-ttgR operator site. Figure 3 shows the dissociation of TtgR from the operator-containing DNA fragment in gel mobility shift experiments when increasing concentrations of either chloramphenicol or tetracycline were added in the binding reaction. This is the first experimental indication that these antibiotics directly promote TtgR dissociation from its operator site.
In order to define the operator region within the
ttgA-ttgR intergenic region to which TtgR binds, we carried out DNase
I footprinting assays in the absence and presence of different
antibiotics (Fig.
4). In the absence of inducers, TtgR protected
the two strands of a single 36-bp segment within the
ttgA-ttgR intergenic region, where an inverted repeat of 12 bp separated
by 4 bp that covers the -10 and -35 regions of both the
ttgABC and the
ttgR promoters seems to be the sequence recognized by
TtgR (Fig.
4). This unique position of the TtgR-binding site
with respect to both divergent promoter regions is consistent
with the coregulation of these promoters observed in vivo. In
agreement with the gel mobility shift assays, this protection
was lost when chloramphenicol or tetracycline was added to the
binding reaction (Fig.
4A), confirming that, in the presence
of these antibiotics, TtgR dissociates from its operator site.
The addition of several other antibiotics like nalidixic acid,
carbenicillin, gentamicin, or streptomycin to the assay did
not cause TtgR dissociation (Fig.
4B), even at a high concentration
of 3 mM (data not shown). These results are consistent with
those of the in vivo experiments, as the antibiotics that did
not induce the expression of
ttgABC (Fig.
1) also did not affect
TtgR binding, in contrast to the results for the antibiotics
shown to be inducers. This provides further evidence for the
direct involvement of TtgR in the antibiotic-dependent induction
of the
ttgABC multidrug efflux pump and strongly accounts for
the hydrophobic antibiotic specificity of the TtgR repressor.
Similar to QacR (
10,
40), TtgR seems to possess a multidrug-binding
site able to accommodate two very structurally different drugs
like chloramphenicol and tetracycline. Moreover, the TtgABC
efflux pump was shown to extrude organic solvents like toluene
and styrene as well as antibiotics (
35). Also, TtgABC expression
is induced by the presence of styrene or 1-naphthol (W. Terán,
J. L. Ramos, and M. T. Gallegos, unpublished data), which suggests
that TtgR is also probably involved in organic solvent binding.

DISCUSSION
This paper provides the first experimental evidence to demonstrate
that the antibiotic-dependent induction of the
P. putida DOT-T1E
multidrug efflux pump TtgABC and its regulatory gene,
ttgR,
is controlled by the repressor protein TtgR. This is the first
case in which the expression of an RND drug transporter has
been shown to be regulated directly by antibiotics via its local
regulator. Other RND transporters regulated by diverse drugs
have been described, but in these cases the regulation involved
one of the so-called global stress regulators, MarA, Rob, or
SoxS (
1,
2,
21,
46). Addition of the structurally dissimilar
antibiotics chloramphenicol and tetracycline, which are also
substrates of the TtgABC transporter, has been demonstrated
to result in derepression of the
ttgABC and
ttgR promoters in
vivo (Fig.
1 and
2). By both in vitro gel mobility shift (Fig.
3) and DNase I protection (Fig.
4) experiments, we have identified
the operator site for TtgR in the
ttgABC-ttgR intergenic region
and have shown that TtgR is released from its operator DNA site
by binding to chloramphenicol and tetracycline.
TtgR is a member of the TetR family of transcriptional regulators (3), all of which share a highly homologous N-terminal DNA-binding domain of
45 residues. The structures of TetR and QacR have revealed that this region forms a three-helix bundle that contains a helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif (16, 29, 40). These conserved DNA-binding domains are connected to diverse ligand-binding domains in the TetR family of proteins (3). Within the TetR family members, there are proteins which bind to
15-bp operator sites, like TetR (16, 29), and others, like QacR, which bind to an unusually long (36-bp) operator consisting of 15-bp half sites separated by a 6-bp spacer region (10). TtgR binds to an imperfect inverted repeat operator sequence which overlaps the ttgABC and ttgR promoters (Fig. 4C); in fact, the -10 and -35 regions of the ttgABC promoter and the -10 region of the ttgR promoter are protected (Fig. 4). This operator site is also large (36 bp), comprising 12-bp half sites separated by 4 bp, which suggests that each half site would probably receive one dimer of TtgR, as reported for QacR (11, 40) and in accordance with the limited 6-bp DNA recognition capacity described for an HTH motif (14). The binding of TtgR to its operator prevents transcription from the ttgABC and ttgR operons, probably by blocking RNA polymerase access to the promoters. Most other members of the family of regulatory proteins that share homology with TtgR and that are divergently transcribed with respect to the operons that they control appear to regulate the expression of their own genes, such as TetR (15); CamR, a repressor of D-camphor degradation in P. putida (3); and TcmR, the repressor of the Streptomyces glaucescens tetracenomycin C resistance gene, tcmA (13).
The repression of ttgABC and ttgR transcription by TtgR was able to be overcome by the addition of the structurally dissimilar antibiotics chloramphenicol and tetracycline, resulting in the induction of ttgABC and ttgR expression (Fig. 1 and 2). Gel mobility shift assays (Fig. 3) suggested that for these two antibiotics, induction of ttgABC and ttgR expression involved the direct interaction of TtgR with the substrates. Direct recognition of structurally dissimilar compounds rather than the involvement of a secondary messenger has also been shown for a limited number of multidrug pump regulators like QacR (10) and BmrR (45, 48) and probably appears to be a more general feature in bacterial multidrug transporter regulation. Why do these antibiotics induce the efflux pump genes while other antibiotic substrates of TtgABC fail to do so? Chloramphenicol and tetracycline probably resemble the natural effectors of the regulatory protein or the natural substrates of the efflux pump.
On the other hand, Duque et al. (6) showed that the levels of expression in the wild-type strain never reached the ones observed in the ttgR null mutant, even in the presence of effectors, which suggests that, in strain DOT-T1E, ttgABC expression is always repressed in such a way that it never achieves the maximum level of expression or at least never achieves the levels reached in the TtgR mutant background. Because of the overlapping nature of the ttgABC and ttgR promoters, TtgR adjusts its own levels of expression in response to the different concentrations of effectors (Fig. 2). Therefore, TtgR seems to be constantly downregulating the expression of the ttgABC efflux pump operon promoter and, in doing so, prevents the overexpression of the pump under any conditions which could be harmful for the cell. This modulating role is similar to the one proposed for the AcrR repressor of the AcrAB pump of E. coli (21). Thus, TtgR functions as a multidrug-binding regulator that specifically modulates the expression of the ttgABC efflux pump in response to the presence of effectors. Future work on the ttgABC-ttgR system should reveal more intimate details of the molecular interactions between the regulator with its effectors and its target DNA.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by grants QLRT-2001-00435 and BIO4-CT97-2270
from the European Commision to J.-L.R. and grant RGY0021/2002
from the Human Frontier Science Programme to M.T.G.
We thank E. Duque for the gift of pED13 and pED14, Ana Hurtado for DNA sequencing, and Carmen Lorente for improving the language of the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: CSIC-Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Apdo. de Correos 419, E-18008 Granada, Spain. Phone: 34-958181608. Fax: 34-958135740, E-mail:
jlramos{at}eez.csic.es.


REFERENCES
1 - Alekshun, M. N., and S. B. Levy. 1997. Regulation of chromosomally mediated multiple antibiotic resistance: the mar regulon. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2067-2075.[Medline]
2 - Aono, R., N. Tsukagoshi, and M. Yamamoto. 1998. Involvement of outer membrane protein TolC, a possible member of the mar-sox regulon, in maintenance and improvement of organic solvent tolerance of Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 180:938-944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Arakami, H., N. Yagi, and M. Suzuki. 1995. Residues important for the function of a multihelical DNA binding domain in the new transcription factor family of Cam and Tet repressors. Protein Eng. 8:1259-1266.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. F. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl. 1991. Current protocols in molecular biology. Greene Publishing Associated, New York, N.Y.
5 - Brooun, A., J. J. Tomashek, and K. Lewis. 1999. Purification and ligand binding of EmrR, a regulator of a multidrug transporter. J. Bacteriol. 181:5131-5133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Duque, E., A. Segura, G. Mosqueda, and J. L. Ramos. 2001. Global and cognate regulators control the expression of the organic solvent efflux pumps TtgABC and TtgDEF of Pseudomonas putida. Mol. Microbiol. 39:1100-1106.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 - Elkins, C. A., and H. Nikaido. 2002. Substrate specificity of the RND-type multidrug efflux pump AcrB and AcrD of Escherichia coli is determined predominantly by two large periplasmic loops. J. Bacteriol. 184:6490-6498.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Enderle, P. J., and M. A. Farwell. 1998. Electroporation of freshly plated Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells. BioTechniques 25:954-956.[Medline]
9 - Fujita, M., K. Tanaka, H. Takahashi, and A. Amemura. 1994. Transcription of the principal sigma-factor genes, rpoD and rpoS, in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is controlled according to the growth phase. Mol. Microbiol. 13:1071-1077.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Grkovic, S., M. H. Brown, N. J. Roberts, I. T. Paulsen, and R. A. Skurray. 1998. QacR is a repressor protein that regulates expression of the Staphylococcus aureus multidrug efflux pump QacA. J. Biol. Chem. 273:18665-18673.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Grkovic, S., M. H. Brown, M. A. Schumacher, R. G. Brennan, and R. A. Skurray. 2001. The staphylococcal QacR multidrug regulator binds a correctly spaced operator as a pair of dimers. J. Bacteriol. 183:7102-7109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Grkovic, S., M. H. Brown, and R. A. Skurray. 2002. Regulation of bacterial drug export systems. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66:671-701.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Guilfoile, P. G., and C. R. Hutchinson. 1992. The Streptomyces glaucescens TcmR protein represses transcription of the divergently oriented tcmR and tcmA genes by binding to an intergenic operator region. J. Bacteriol. 174:3659-3666.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Harrison, S. C., and A. K. Aggarwal. 1990. DNA recognition by proteins with the helix-turn-helix motif. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59:933-969.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 - Hillen, W., and C. Berens. 1994. Mechanisms underlying expression of Tn10 encoded tetracycline resistance. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 48:345-369.[Medline]
16 - Hinrichs, W., C. Kisker, M. Duvel, A. Muller, K. Tovar, W. Hillen, and W. Saenger. 1994. Structure of the Tet repressor-tetracycline complex and regulation of antibiotic resistance. Science 264:418-420.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Kieboom, J., J. J. Dennis, J. A. de Bont, and G. J. Zylstra. 1998. Identification and molecular characterization of an efflux pump involved in Pseudomonas putida S12 solvent tolerance. J. Biol. Chem. 273:85-91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18 - Kieboom, J., and J. de Bont. 2001. Identification and molecular characterization of an efflux system involved in Pseudomonas putida S12 multidrug resistance. Microbiology 147:43-51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19 - Lin, J., L. O. Michel, and Q. Zhang. 2002. CmeABC functions as a multidrug efflux system in Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2124-2131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20 - Lomovskaya, O., K. Lewis, and A. Matin. 1995. EmrR is a negative regulator of the Escherichia coli multidrug resistance pump EmrAB. J. Bacteriol. 177:2328-2334.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21 - Ma, D., M. Alberti, C. Lynch, H. Nikaido, and J. E. Hearst. 1996. The local repressor AcrR plays a modulating role in the regulation of acrAB genes of Escherichia coli by global stress signals. Mol. Microbiol. 19:101-112.[CrossRef][Medline]
22 - Marqués, S., J. L. Ramos, and K. N. Timmis. 1993. Analysis of the mRNA structure of the Pseudomonas putida TOL meta fission pathway operon around the transcription initiation point, the xylTE and the xylFJ regions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1216:227-236.[Medline]
23 - Miller, J. H. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics, p. 352-355. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
24 - Mosqueda, G., and J. L. Ramos. 2000. A set of genes encoding a second toluene efflux system in Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E is linked to the tod genes for toluene metabolism. J. Bacteriol. 182:937-943.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25 - Murakami, S., R. Nakashima, E. Yamashita, and A. Yamaguchi. 2002. Crystal structure of bacterial multidrug efflux transporter AcrB. Nature 419:587-593.[CrossRef][Medline]
26 - Nikaido, H. 1996. Multidrug efflux pumps of gram-negative bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 178:5853-5859.[Free Full Text]
27 - Nikaido, H., and H. I. Zgurskaya. 2001. AcrAB and related multidrug efflux pumps of Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 3:215-218.[Medline]
28 - Orth, P., D. Schnappinger, P. E. Sum, G. A. Ellestad, W. Hillen, W. Saenger, and W. Hinrichs. 1999. Crystal structure of the tet repressor in complex with a novel tetracycline, 9-(N,N-dimethylglycylamido)-6-demethyl-6-deoxy-tetracycline. J. Mol. Biol. 285:455-461.[CrossRef][Medline]
29 - Orth, P., D. Schnappinger, W. Hillen, W. Saenger, and W. Hinrichs. 2000. Structural basis of gene regulation by the tetracycline inducible Tet repressor-operator system. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7:215-219.[CrossRef][Medline]
30 - Poole, K. 2001. Multidrug efflux pumps and antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and related organisms. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 3:255-264.[Medline]
31 - Ramos, J. L., E. Duque, M. J. Huertas, and A. Haidour. 1995. Isolation and expansion of the catabolic potential of a Pseudomonas putida strain able to grow in the presence of high concentrations of aromatic hydrocarbons. J. Bacteriol. 177:3911-3916.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32 - Ramos, J. L., E. Duque, P. Godoy, and A. Segura. 1998. Efflux pumps involved in toluene tolerance in Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E. J. Bacteriol. 180:3323-3329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33 - Ramos, J. L., E. Duque, M. T. Gallegos, P. Godoy, M. I. Ramos-González, A. Rojas, W. Terán, and A. Segura. 2002. Mechanisms of solvent tolerance in gram-negative bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56:743-768.[CrossRef][Medline]
34 - Ramos-Gonzalez, M. I., and S. Molin. 1998. Cloning, sequencing, and phenotypic characterization of the rpoS gene from Pseudomonas putida KT2440. J. Bacteriol. 180:3421-3431.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35 - Rojas, A., E. Duque, G. Mosqueda, G. Golden, A. Hurtado, J. L. Ramos, and A. Segura. 2001. Three efflux pumps are required to provide efficient tolerance to toluene in Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E. J. Bacteriol. 183:3967-3973.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36 - Rojas A., A. Segura, M. E. Guazzaroni, W. Terán, A. Hurtado, M. T. Gallegos and J. L. Ramos. 2003. In vivo and in vitro evidence shows that TtgV is the local specific regulator of the TtgGHI multidrug and solvent efflux pump of Pseudomonas putida. J. Bacteriol. 185:4755-4763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37 - Saier, M. H., Jr., and I. T. Paulsen. 2001. Phylogeny of multidrug transporters. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol. 12:205-213.[CrossRef][Medline]
38 - Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
39 - Schumacher, M. A., M. C. Miller, S. Grkovic, M. H. Brown, R. A. Skurray, and R. G. Brennan. 2001. Structural mechanisms of QacR induction and multidrug recognition. Science 294:2158-2163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40 - Schumacher, M. A., M. C. Miller, S. Grkovic, M. H. Brown, R. A. Skurray, and R. G. Brennan. 2002. Structural basis for cooperative DNA binding by two dimers of the multidrug-binding protein QacR. EMBO J. 21:1210-1218.[CrossRef][Medline]
41 - Shafer, W., W. L. Veal, E. H. Lee, L. Zarantonelli, J. T. Balthazar, and C. Rouquette. 2001. Genetic organization and regulation of antimicrobial efflux systems possessed by Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Neisseria meningitidis. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 3:219-224.[Medline]
42 - Spaink, H. P., R. J. H. Okker, C. A. Wijffelman, E. Pees, and B. J. J. Lugtenberg. 1987. Promoters in the nodulation region of the Rhizobium leguminosarum Sym plasmid pRL1JI. Plant Mol. Biol. 9:27-39.
43 - Tikhonova, E. B., Q. Wang, and H. I. Zgurskaya. 2002. Chimeric analysis of the multicomponent multidrug efflux transporters from gram-negative bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 184:6499-6507.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44 - Tseng, T. T., K. S. Gratwick, J. Kollman, D. Park, D. H. Nies, A. Goffeau, and M. H. Saier. 1999. The RND permease superfamily: an ancient, ubiquitous and diverse family that includes human disease and development proteins. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1:107-125.[Medline]
45 - Vazquez-Laslop, N., P. N. Markham, and A. A. Neyfakh. 1999. Mechanism of ligand recognition by BmrR, the multidrug-responding transcriptional regulator: mutational analysis of the ligand-binding site. Biochemistry 38:16925-16931.[CrossRef][Medline]
46 - White, D. G., J. D. Goldman, B. Demple, and S. B. Levy. 1997. Role of the acrAB locus in organic solvent tolerance mediated by expression of marA, soxS, or robA in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 179:6122-6126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47 - Zgurskaya, H. I., and H. Nikaido. 2000. Multidrug resistance mechanisms: drug efflux across two membranes. Mol. Microbiol. 37:219-225.[CrossRef][Medline]
48 - Zheleznova, E. E., and R. G. Brennan. 2001. Crystal structure of the transcription activator BmrR bound to DNA and a drug. Nature 409:378-382.[CrossRef][Medline]
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2003, p. 3067-3072, Vol. 47, No. 10
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.10.3067-3072.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Gitzinger, M., Kemmer, C., El-Baba, M. D., Weber, W., Fussenegger, M.
(2009). Controlling transgene expression in subcutaneous implants using a skin lotion containing the apple metabolite phloretin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
106: 10638-10643
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cerda-Maira, F. A., Ringelberg, C. S., Taylor, R. K.
(2008). The Bile Response Repressor BreR Regulates Expression of the Vibrio cholerae breAB Efflux System Operon. J. Bacteriol.
190: 7441-7452
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Stoitsova, S. O., Braun, Y., Ullrich, M. S., Weingart, H.
(2008). Characterization of the RND-Type Multidrug Efflux Pump MexAB-OprM of the Plant Pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 3387-3393
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dominguez-Cuevas, P., Marin, P., Busby, S., Ramos, J. L., Marques, S.
(2008). Roles of Effectors in XylS-Dependent Transcription Activation: Intramolecular Domain Derepression and DNA Binding. J. Bacteriol.
190: 3118-3128
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Heras, S. R., Lopez, M. C., Olivares, M., Thomas, M. C.
(2007). The L1Tc non-LTR retrotransposon of Trypanosoma cruzi contains an internal RNA-pol II-dependent promoter that strongly activates gene transcription and generates unspliced transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res
35: 2199-2214
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Duque, E., Rodriguez-Herva, J.-J., de la Torre, J., Dominguez-Cuevas, P., Munoz-Rojas, J., Ramos, J.-L.
(2007). The RpoT Regulon of Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E and Its Role in Stress Endurance against Solvents. J. Bacteriol.
189: 207-219
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Morita, Y., Cao, L., Gould, V. C., Avison, M. B., Poole, K.
(2006). nalD Encodes a Second Repressor of the mexAB-oprM Multidrug Efflux Operon of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol.
188: 8649-8654
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Buroni, S., Manina, G., Guglierame, P., Pasca, M. R., Riccardi, G., De Rossi, E.
(2006). LfrR Is a Repressor That Regulates Expression of the Efflux Pump LfrA in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 4044-4052
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dominguez-Cuevas, P., Gonzalez-Pastor, J.-E., Marques, S., Ramos, J.-L., de Lorenzo, V.
(2006). Transcriptional Tradeoff between Metabolic and Stress-response Programs in Pseudomonas putida KT2440 Cells Exposed to Toluene. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 11981-11991
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Teran, W., Krell, T., Ramos, J. L., Gallegos, M.-T.
(2006). Effector-Repressor Interactions, Binding of a Single Effector Molecule to the Operator-bound TtgR Homodimer Mediates Derepression. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 7102-7109
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Marrer, E., Schad, K., Satoh, A. T., Page, M. G. P., Johnson, M. M., Piddock, L. J. V.
(2006). Involvement of the Putative ATP-Dependent Efflux Proteins PatA and PatB in Fluoroquinolone Resistance of a Multidrug-Resistant Mutant of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 685-693
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lin, J., Cagliero, C., Guo, B., Barton, Y.-W., Maurel, M.-C., Payot, S., Zhang, Q.
(2005). Bile Salts Modulate Expression of the CmeABC Multidrug Efflux Pump in Campylobacter jejuni. J. Bacteriol.
187: 7417-7424
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Segura, A., Godoy, P., van Dillewijn, P., Hurtado, A., Arroyo, N., Santacruz, S., Ramos, J.-L.
(2005). Proteomic Analysis Reveals the Participation of Energy- and Stress-Related Proteins in the Response of Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E to Toluene. J. Bacteriol.
187: 5937-5945
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ramos, J. L., Martinez-Bueno, M., Molina-Henares, A. J., Teran, W., Watanabe, K., Zhang, X., Gallegos, M. T., Brennan, R., Tobes, R.
(2005). The TetR Family of Transcriptional Repressors. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
69: 326-356
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Guazzaroni, M.-E., Krell, T., Felipe, A., Ruiz, R., Meng, C., Zhang, X., Gallegos, M.-T., Ramos, J. L.
(2005). The Multidrug Efflux Regulator TtgV Recognizes a Wide Range of Structurally Different Effectors in Solution and Complexed with Target DNA: EVIDENCE FROM ISOTHERMAL TITRATION CALORIMETRY. J. Biol. Chem.
280: 20887-20893
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rojas, A., Duque, E., Schmid, A., Hurtado, A., Ramos, J.-L., Segura, A.
(2004). Biotransformation in Double-Phase Systems: Physiological Responses of Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E to a Double Phase Made of Aliphatic Alcohols and Biosynthesis of Substituted Catechols. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
70: 3637-3643
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Guazzaroni, M.-E., Teran, W., Zhang, X., Gallegos, M.-T., Ramos, J. L.
(2004). TtgV Bound to a Complex Operator Site Represses Transcription of the Promoter for the Multidrug and Solvent Extrusion TtgGHI Pump. J. Bacteriol.
186: 2921-2927
[Abstract]
[Full Text]