Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2003, p. 3519-3524, Vol. 47, No. 11
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.11.3519-3524.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Veterinary Science and Microbiology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
Received 4 April 2003/ Returned for modification 11 June 2003/ Accepted 22 July 2003
|
|
|---|
128 µg/ml). These isolates also exhibited resistance to other macrolide and lincosamide antibiotics, suggesting a macrolide-lincosamide resistance phenotype. Of the 11 resistant isolates, genomic DNA from nine hybridized to an erm(X)-specific probe. Cloning and nucleotide sequencing of the A. pyogenes erm(X) gene indicated that it was >95% similar to erm(X) genes from Corynebacterium and Propionibacterium spp. Eight of the erm(X)-containing A. pyogenes isolates exhibited inducible tylosin resistance, which was consistent with the presence of a putative leader peptide upstream of the erm(X) open reading frame. For at least one A. pyogenes isolate, 98-4277-2, erm(X) was present on a plasmid, pAP2, and was associated with the insertion sequence IS6100. pAP2 also carried genes encoding the repressor-regulated tetracycline efflux system determinant Tet 33. The repA gene from pAP2 was nonfunctional in Escherichia coli and at least one A. pyogenes isolate, suggesting that there may be host-encoded factors required for replication of this plasmid. |
|
|---|
Fusobacterium necrophorum is the primary etiological agent of bovine hepatic abscessation (18), but Arcanobacterium pyogenes is a synergistic pathogen, being found in 10 (9) to 90% (12) of abscesses. Interestingly, in cattle fed tylosin, the incidence of hepatic abscesses containing A. pyogenes increased from 10 to 53% (9).
The resistance of A. pyogenes to tylosin has only recently been documented. In a survey of A. pyogenes strains conducted in our laboratory, we observed that resistance of A. pyogenes to tylosin was prevalent, with 22.9% of isolates tested (n = 48) having MICs of tylosin of
64 µg/ml (25). In addition, for the tylosin-resistant strains, MICs of a wide spectrum of macrolide and lincosamide antimicrobial agents were increased (25), suggesting a macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin B resistance phenotype. However, the mechanism(s) of resistance to tylosin in A. pyogenes was not investigated.
In this study, we report the identification and characterization of a plasmid-encoded Erm X determinant in a tylosin-resistant A. pyogenes isolate.
|
|
|---|
MCR strains (Gibco-BRL) were grown at 37°C on Luria-Bertani (Difco) agar or in Luria-Bertani broth with shaking. Antibiotics were added as appropriate for A. pyogenes (tylosin, 15 µg/ml; kanamycin [KM], 30 µg/ml; tetracycline [TC], 1 µg/ml) and for E. coli (chloramphenicol, 30 µg/ml; erythromycin, 200 µg/ml; KM, 50, µg/ml; and TC, 2 µg/ml). DNA techniques. Genomic DNA from A. pyogenes was isolated by the method of Pospiech and Neumann (14). E. coli plasmid DNA extraction, transformation, DNA restriction, ligation, agarose gel electrophoresis, and Southern transfer of DNA to nylon membranes were performed essentially as described previously (2). Preparation of DNA probes using oligonucleotide primers designed to specific genes, DNA hybridization, and probe detection were performed using the digoxigenin (DIG) DNA labeling and detection kit (Roche), as recommended by the manufacturer. PCR DNA amplification was performed using TaqDNA polymerase (Promega) with the supplied reaction buffer for 35 cycles consisting of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 55°C, and 1 min/kb at 72°C, with a final extension step of 72°C for 5 min. The plasmids and oligonucleotide primers used in this study are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Plasmids used in this study
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Sequences of oligonucleotide primers used in this study
|
Computer sequence analysis. Nucleotide sequence data were compiled using the Sequencher program (GeneCodes). Database searches were performed using the BlastX and BlastP algorithms (1). Sequence analysis was performed using the suite of programs available through the Genetics Computer Group (Accelyrs). Multiple sequence alignments were performed using CLUSTAL W (24).
Determination of MICs. Determination of MICs for A. pyogenes used National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards methodology (13), with the modifications described by Trinh et al. (25). The antimicrobial agents to be tested were diluted in a doubling dilution pattern over the range of 0.06 to 2,048 µg/ml in the wells of sterile, 96-well, round-bottom microtiter plates in 50-µl volumes. The MIC was read visually as the lowest concentration of the antimicrobial agent to prevent growth (turbidity), compared with the control (no antimicrobial agent added). Each isolate was tested in duplicate, on two separate occasions, and the endpoints for each antimicrobial agent did not differ. In order to determine MICs following induction, the A. pyogenes isolates were grown on BHI agar containing 5% bovine blood and 1 µg of the appropriate antimicrobial agent/ml, prior to MIC determination, as described above.
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The sequence of pAP2 was submitted to the GenBank database under accession number AY255627.
|
|
|---|
64 µg/ml (25). rRNA methylases, encoded by erm genes, are common determinants of macrolide resistance (16). More specifically, Erm X is a common determinant of macrolide resistance in the coryneform bacteria, to which A. pyogenes is related. A DIG-labeled probe to the erm(X) gene of the Corynebacterium diphtheriae plasmid, pNG2 (5), was generated (Table 2) and used to probe genomic DNA from 48 A. pyogenes isolates under high-stringency conditions. The DNA from 9 of the 11 tylosin-resistant, but none of the tylosin-susceptible, A. pyogenes isolates hybridized to the erm(X) probe (Fig. 1), suggesting that erm(X) is a predominant determinant of tylosin resistance in A. pyogenes.
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Dot blot hybridization of A. pyogenes strains with an erm(X)-specific probe. Approximately 500 ng of genomic DNA from 48 A. pyogenes isolates was spotted onto a nylon membrane and hybridized with the erm(X)-specific probe under high-stringency conditions. The tylosin-resistant and -susceptible isolates are indicated. The two tylosin-resistant isolates which do not contain erm(X) are the first two dots on the first row.
|
128 µg/ml, which increased to >2,048 µg/ml upon induction with tylosin. For two of the erm(X)-containing strains, MICs were low at
8 µg/ml, which increased to 128 µg/ml following induction (Table 3). In comparison, for susceptible strains of A. pyogenes, MICs of tylosin were
0.06 µg/ml (25). The two tylosin-resistant, non-erm(X) containing strains, OX-1 and OX-7, did not exhibit inducible resistance to tylosin (Table 3). The resistance phenotypes observed among the erm(X)-containing strains varied considerably. This could be due to the presence of other resistance mechanisms, such as additional erm genes, genes encoding efflux pumps, or ribosomal mutations. In addition, any erm(X)-carrying plasmids could be present at variable copy number, giving rise to different MICs through a gene dosage effect. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. MICs of tylosin for A. pyogenes strains with and without induction
|
Cloning and nucleotide sequence determination of erm(X).
A Southern blot of HindIII-digested 98-4277-2 genomic DNA was hybridized with the erm(X) probe under high-stringency conditions, and a 3.2-kb hybridizing band was identified (data not shown). A HindIII library of A. pyogenes 98-4277-2 genomic DNA was prepared in pBC KS (Stratagene) and introduced into E. coli DH5
MCR by electroporation. Clones carrying the erm(X) gene were identified by colony hybridization with the erm(X)-specific probe. One such clone, pJGS392, was selected for further analysis. pJGS392 contained a 3.2-kb HindIII insert, and sequence analysis revealed that erm(X) was indeed present in this clone. The A. pyogenes erm(X) gene had significant DNA identity with the erm(X) genes from the C. diphtheriae plasmid, pNG2 (97.7%; GenBank accession no. AF492560), the Corynebacterium striatum plasmid, pTP10 (97.5%; GenBank accession no. AF024666), and the Corynebacterium jeikeium and Propionibacterium acnes transposon, Tn5432 (94.7% and 97.5%; GenBank accession no. AF338705 and AF411029, respectively). The A. pyogenes Erm(X) protein shared 97.5% identity and 98.2% similarity with Erm(X) from pNG2. In order to confirm that erm(X) was responsible for the tylosin resistance phenotype, a 2.8-kb SalI-BamHI fragment of pJGS392, containing erm(X), was cloned into the KM resistance vector, pEP2 (15), which replicates in A. pyogenes (6). This plasmid, pJGS406, was used to transform A. pyogenes BBR1 to KM resistance, and the MIC for tylosin was determined. For BBR1(pEP2), the MIC of tylosin was
0.06 µg/ml, compared to that for BBR1(pJGS406) of 64 µg/ml, which increased to 128 µg/ml following induction with tylosin (Table 3). The higher uninduced MIC for BBR1(pJGS406) compared with 98-4277-2 may reflect that for BBR1(pJGS406), erm(X) is carried on a multicopy plasmid.
As with its homologues, upstream of the A. pyogenes erm(X) gene is an open reading frame (ORF) encoding a 15-amino-acid leader peptide (Fig. 2A), which has been postulated to be involved in translational attenuation similar to that seen with erm(C), leading to an inducible resistance phenotype (27). However, in strain 98-4277-2, there was an 86-bp duplication, including the ribosome binding site and the first 24 codons of erm(X), creating a small ORF, orf28, which overlaps stop codon to start codon with erm(X) (Fig. 2A). To determine whether this duplication was found in all erm(X)-containing isolates, PCR was used to amplify the region around the duplication. Primers ermX1 and ermX5 (Table 2) amplified a 657-bp product in strain 98-4277-2 (Fig. 2B). The other eight strains apparently did not possess this duplication, since the PCR products amplified were approximately 86 bp smaller (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, the PCR products from two of these strains were sequenced, confirming the lack of duplication (data not shown). The duplication in 98-4277-2 may explain the lower MIC of tylosin observed for this isolate (Table 3), since the duplication may alter any secondary structures in the leader peptide region of erm(X) which may be involved in transcriptional or translational attenuation. Similar duplications have been observed in other erm genes (7). However, these duplications relieve translational attenuation, such that gene expression is constitutive. This is not the case with the erm(X) gene from 98-4277-2, since it still retains its inducible phenotype. Additional studies will be required to determine the role of this duplication in induction and whether it acts at the transcriptional or translational level.
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. (A) The 98-4277-2 erm(X) leader peptide region. The nucleotide sequence of the erm(X) leader peptide region is shown, with ORF translations below the sequence, the start of which is denoted by the bent arrows and the ORF designations. The putative erm(X) promoter sequences are boxed in black, and the putative ribosome binding sites and start codons for each of the ORFs are boxed in gray or outlined, respectively. The 86-bp duplication is denoted by double underlining, with the corresponding sequence in erm(X) underlined. Nucleotides are numbered from the start of erm(X), as indicated to the right of the sequence. (B) PCR amplification of the leader peptide region of erm(X) using primers ermX1 and ermX5. The PCR products were visualized following electrophoresis in a 1.5% agarose gel. Lanes: 1 and 12, 100-bp ladder (Promega); 2, strain E1DE; 3, strain 4759; 4, strain 3; 5, strain 4; 6, strain 2977; 7, strain B167; 8, strain 98-4277-2; 9, strain 52785-99; 10, strain 14373-00-1; 11, no template (negative control). The 657-bp or 571-bp products are indicated by the arrows.
|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Schematic representation of pAP2. Sites for relevant restriction enzymes are shown, followed by their positions in base pairs from the zero point at the top of the map. The seven ORFs, tetR(33), tetA(33), tnpA, erm(X), gcrY, repA, and orf95, are indicated by the closed arrows. The 22-bp box element is depicted as an open rectangle. The dashed lines indicate IS6100 sequences.
|
Downstream of orf95 is repA, which encodes a replication protein with similarity to RepA from pNG2 (46.8% identity, 54.7% similarity) and pTET3 (39.5% identity, 54.4% similarity). The pAP2 repA gene is truncated at the 5' end compared with that from pNG2, which may have resulted from the fusion of the truncated IS6100 sequence during insertion of the tet gene element. One hundred eighty-two base pairs downstream of repA is a copy of the 22-bp box (5'-CGTAAGCAATATACGGTTCCCC-3') thought to be required for replication of corynebacterial rolling circle plasmids (20).
pAP2 also carries gcrY, so named because of the similarity of its translated product to GcrY, a protein of unknown function, encoded by pTP10 (71.8% identity, 87.7% similarity). The 6-bp GTATAC direct repeats downstream of gcrY in pTP10 (23) were not present in pAP2.
Given the similarity of the pAP2 repA to that of pNG2, which is broad host range (19), we tried to transform E. coli to erythromycin resistance with 98-4277-2 genomic DNA, containing pAP2, but were unsuccessful after numerous attempts (data not shown). Similar experiments were performed with A. pyogenes strain BBR1 using either 98-4277-2 genomic DNA or pJGS551, which carries an intact repA gene and its associated 22-bp box. No transformants were obtained in several attempts, indicating that pAP2 does not replicate in A. pyogenes strain BBR1 (data not shown). As a control, strain 98-4277-2 was transformed to CM resistance with pJGS551, demonstrating that pJGS551 is replication competent in the appropriate host. We conclude that pAP2 likely requires additional host-encoded factors, not present in strain BBR1, for efficient replication. One reason for this may be the apparent 5' deletion of repA, which may have occurred during plasmid evolution.
pAP2 is not carried by all erm(X)-containing A. pyogenes isolates. The finding that erm(X) in 98-4277-2 was plasmid borne led us to investigate whether this gene was carried on a similar plasmid in all erm(X)-containing strains. DIG-labeled probes were prepared for tnpA (IS6100), repA, and tetA(33) (Table 2) and were hybridized under high-stringency conditions against the 11 tylosin-resistant isolates and 37 tylosin susceptible isolates. IS6100 was preferentially associated with erm(X)-containing isolates, since 88.9% of erm(X) strains carried IS6100, compared with 10.3% of non-erm(X) strains (Fig. 4A). However, PCR experiments indicated that IS6100 and erm(X) were adjacent only in strain 98-4277-2 (data not shown). repA was present in only two erm(X) strains, indicating that erm(X) was not pAP2 associated in all erm(X) strains. Furthermore, the finding that only two non-erm(X) strains carried repA (Fig. 4B) indicates that pAP2-like plasmids are not widespread, correlating with the suggestion that replication of repA-containing plasmids may be strain specific. tetA(33) was present in 55.6% of erm(X)-containing strains but only in 5.1% of non-erm(X) strains (Fig. 4C). Only one other erm(X)-containing isolate in addition to 98-4277-2 carried all three ORFs. The two non-erm(X) strains carrying repA, also carried tetA(33), but only one also carried IS6100. The permuted combinations of resistance genes and insertion sequences with repA may suggest the presence of other pAP2-like plasmids.
![]() View larger version (73K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Dot blot hybridization of A. pyogenes strains with the tnpA-specific probe (A), the repA-specific probe (B), and the tetA(33)-specific probe (C). Approximately 500 ng of genomic DNA from 48 A. pyogenes isolates was spotted onto a nylon membrane and hybridized with the respective probes under high-stringency conditions. The tylosin-resistant and -susceptible isolates are indicated. The two tylosin-resistant isolates which do not contain erm(X) are the first two dots on the first row on each blot.
|
tetA(33) confers low-level TC resistance in A. pyogenes.
Sequence analysis of pAP2 indicated that like pTET3, this plasmid contained the repressor-regulated TC resistance determinant, Tet 33, which is similar to group I tetracycline efflux systems from gram-negative bacteria (21). This system was functional in E. coli, since we were able to clone the 6.2-kb HindIII fragment of pAP2 containing Tet 33 in pJGS551 by selection on TC. For C. glutamicum, tetA(33) results in an MIC of TC of 16 µg/ml (21). However, for A. pyogenes strains carrying tetA(33), this gene was only able to result in an MIC of TC of 1 µg/ml, compared with TC-susceptible strains, for which MICs of TC were
0.06 µg/ml (3). This is in contrast to strains carrying tet(W), the most prevalent TC resistance gene in A. pyogenes, which confers an MIC of TC of 8 µg/ml (3). For A. pyogenes strains harboring both genes, the MIC of TC is 16 µg/ml. Tauch et al. found that tetA(33) was inducible for C. glutamicum (21), but no induction was observed for A. pyogenes (data not shown).
Conclusions. In the United States, tylosin is widely used as a feed additive to control liver abscessation in feedlot cattle (11). Resistance of the liver abscess pathogen, A. pyogenes, to macrolide antibiotics has been reported (4, 25, 28), but the mechanisms of resistance were not determined. This work is the first report of the identification and characterization of a determinant encoding tylosin resistance in A. pyogenes. Erm X is a prevalent determinant of tylosin resistance, with more than 80% of the tylosin-resistant A. pyogenes strains studied carrying this determinant. For strain 98-4277-2, erm(X) is encoded on a plasmid, pAP2, but this plasmid is not widespread among erm(X)-containing strains. pAP2 also carries a Tet 33 determinant, which is only the second Tet determinant identified for A. pyogenes. The finding that two tylosin-resistant A. pyogenes strains did not carry erm(X) suggests that there is at least one other determinant of tylosin resistance present in this organism.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»