Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2003, p. 3651-3652, Vol. 47, No. 11
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.11.3651-3652.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Bristol Centre for Antimicrobial Research and Evaluation, Department of Medical Microbiology, Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB,1 Bristol Centre for Antimicrobial Research and Evaluation, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, School of Medical Sciences, Clifton, Bristol, BS8 1TD, United Kingdom2
Received 26 December 2002/ Returned for modification 17 May 2003/ Accepted 23 July 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The oxazolidinones are a novel class of antimicrobials with activity against nearly all gram-positive organisms including those resistant to other agents. They inhibit protein synthesis by binding to domain V of the 23S rRNA and thereby blocking formation of the initiation complex (10). Resistance occurs rarely in staphylococci and is caused by mutations within the 23S rRNA, usually G2576U (6, 8). Thus far, linezolid is the only member of this class to be marketed, but there are a number of compounds such as AZD2563 that are undergoing investigation. We report on the activity of AZD2563 against clinical strains of S. aureus with reduced vancomycin susceptibility and laboratory-derived strains resistant to linezolid.
The strains tested were ATCC 25923 (control); 12 clinical vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) strains from the United States, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and Sweden; 122 heterogenous VISA (hVISA) strains defined by population analysis profile-area under curve ratio (9) from the United States, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, Norway, and Sweden; and laboratory-selected linezolid-resistant strains. To produce the latter strains, eight unrelated strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus were subjected to the selection process. Briefly, the MIC of linezolid was determined by broth macrodilution performed in Mueller-Hinton broth, and after 18 h of incubation the two highest concentrations supporting growth were pooled and used as inoculum for a further MIC determination. This process was repeated daily for 28 days. The isolates from days 0, 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 were tested in the present study. The mechanism of resistance has been previously reported for these strains (R. A. Howe, A. R. Noel, K. E. Bowker, V. I. Enne, T. R. Walsh, and A. P. MacGowan, Abstr. 42nd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. C1-1608, 2002). All but two strains have mutations in domain V of the 23S rRNA gene, the linezolid target site, including G2576U, which was identified in the only two reported clinical isolates of linezolid-resistant S. aureus (6, 8); G2447U, which has been reported in laboratory-derived linezolid-resistant S. aureus (S. M. Swaney, D. L. Shinabarger, R. D. Schaadt, J. H. Bock, J. L. Slightom, and G. E. Zurenko, Abstr. 38th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. C-104, 1998); and C2192T, which has not previously been associated with linezolid resistance.
Susceptibility testing was performed by agar dilution MIC determination by NCCLS methodology with Mueller-Hinton agar and an inoculum of 104 CFU/spot (5). The antimicrobials tested were AZD2563 (AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom), linezolid (Pharmacia Upjohn, Kalamazoo, Mich.), ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin (Bayer, Newbury, United Kingdom), erythromycin and rifampin (Sigma Chemicals, Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom), telithromycin and gentamicin (Hoechst Marion Roussel, Uxbridge, United Kingdom), and quinupristin-dalfopristin (Aventis, West Malling, United Kingdom). Published NCCLS interpretive breakpoint criteria were used (4).
Table 1 shows the comparative susceptibility data for the VISA and hVISA strains. The most potent agents were the oxazolidinones; all hVISA and VISA strains were susceptible to linezolid. Quinupristin-dalfopristin was active against more than 90% of strains, and of the other comparator agents tested, only moxifloxacin displayed significant activity, with more than 50% of strains susceptible. Frequency distributions of AZD2563 and linezolid MICs for hVISA strains, laboratory-generated linezolid-resistant mutants, and their linezolid-susceptible parental strains are shown in Fig. 1. For hVISA AZD2563 was marginally more potent than linezolid, with MICs twofold lower than those of linezolid for most strains. The MICs of AZD2563 for linezolid-susceptible parental strains and mutants with low-level linezolid resistance (MIC, 8 mg/liter) were also usually twofold lower than those of linezolid. However, there was a trend for MICs of AZD2563 to be twofold higher for strains with higher levels of resistance to linezolid.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Comparative susceptibilities of VISA and hVISA strainsa
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Frequency distribution of MICs for hVISA strains (n = 122) (A) and linezolid-resistant mutants and susceptible parental strains (n = 40) (B). Solid bars, AZD2563; hatched bars, linezolid.
|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»