Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 2003, p. 735-738, Vol. 47, No. 2
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.2.735-738.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Parasitology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen,1 Jomaa Pharmaka GmbH, Giessen, Germany,4 Medical Research Unit, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Lambaréné, Gabon,2 Mae Sot General Hospital, Mae Sot, Thailand3
Received 19 July 2002/ Returned for modification 19 August 2002/ Accepted 28 October 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fosmidomycin was formerly under development as an antibacterial agent. As a phosphonic acid derivative with potent activity against gram-negative organisms, its role in the management of urinary tract infections was the focus of clinical studies that were undertaken during the 1980s. However, its early promise in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections was countered by its relative lack of effectiveness against recurrent infections, although the safety of the drug even in high doses (1.0 g every 6 h for 7 days, per os) was established (7, 8, 9).
As a potent inhibitor of 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase, an essential enzyme of the nonmevalonate pathway, fosmidomycin blocks the biosynthesis of isopentenyl diphosphate and the subsequent development of isoprenoids in P. falciparum (5). In contrast, isoprenoids are derived from an alternative pathway, known as the mevalonate pathway, in mammals (1). Hence, fosmidomycin exerts its antimalarial activity through a mechanism of selective toxicity that allows the biosynthesis of isoprenoids, which are essential for cellular function, to be maintained in mammalian hosts. In vitro experiments have shown that fosmidomycin exhibits its full antimalarial potency when the parasites are exposed to the agent for a full replication cycle, leading to an arrest of development in the late schizont stage. In contrast to other antibiotics with antimalarial properties such as doxycycline or clindamycin, it does not exert a delayed effect (unpublished data).
Fosmidomycin, through a novel mode of action against the malarial parasite and with the support of evidence of efficacy in experimental models (5), offers a new concept in antimalarial drug development (12). The present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fosmidomycin in the treatment of acute uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria.
|
|
|---|
Study design. Subjects aged 18 to 50 years, each with a body weight in excess of 40 kg, attending as outpatients with symptoms of acute uncomplicated malaria and parasitemia levels between 1,000 and 50,000/µl, were invited to participate in the study. Subjects were excluded if they had a mixed plasmodial infection, significant concomitant disease, a hemoglobin count of <8 g/dl, or a white cell count of >12,000/µl (to exclude severe disease), or had received antimalarial treatment within the previous 28 days. Women who were pregnant or breastfeeding were also excluded.
The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the International Foundation of the Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Lambaréné, Gabon, and by the Ethical Review Committee for Research in Human Subjects, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand. The study was conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.
The study had two phases: a treatment phase lasting 7 days and a follow-up phase of 21 days. During the treatment phase, the subjects were closely monitored in the hospital and received 1,200 mg of fosmidomycin orally every 8 h for 7 days. This regimen had been shown to be well tolerated in previous studies (9). The study drug (fosmidomycin sodium batch no. 008003) was provided by Jomaa Pharmaka GmbH. The drug's stability was confirmed prior to the commencement of the study. Parasite counts were performed, and vital signs (temperature and pulse) were monitored every 8 h during the acute stage of the infection and then once daily for the duration of this phase. Clinical examinations were also carried out daily, with subjects being queried from a standard list of symptoms commonly associated with malaria. Blood samples were obtained for routine hematology and clinical chemistry testing prior to drug administration and on days 2, 4, and 7. A pretreatment blood sample was also taken for parasite genotyping in the event of recurrent parasitemia. Urinalysis was carried out at screening and on days 2, 4, and 7.
During the follow-up phase, subjects were reviewed weekly on days 14, 21, and 28, when clinical assessments and thick blood smears were performed. Additional blood samples for hematology and clinical chemistry studies were taken on day 28. In the event of recurrent parasitemia, a second blood sample was taken for PCR analysis and the subject was withdrawn from the study and treated with standard antimalarialssulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in Gabon and mefloquine-artesunate in Thailand.
Variables analyzed. The primary efficacy variable was the cure rate on day 7. Secondary efficacy variables were the parasite and fever clearance times and the cure rate on day 28. The parasite clearance time was defined as the time from initiation of treatment to the first of at least two consecutive negative blood smears. PC50 and PC90 were defined as hours until clearance of 50 and 90% of the initial parasitemia levels, respectively. The fever clearance time was calculated from the commencement of therapy to the time that the temperature fell below 37.5°C and remained below 37.5°C for 48 h. Adverse events were defined as any symptoms or signs which first occurred or increased in severity during the study period. Each adverse event was categorized according to seriousness (need for hospitalization), intensity (mild to severe), and causality (relationship to the study drug). A clinical assessment checklist contained the following signs and symptoms: weakness, chills or rigors, headache, myalgia, dizziness, abdominal pain, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, palpitations, insomnia, pruritus, coughing, and tinnitus. Abnormal laboratory values, considered to be clinically relevant, were also reported as adverse events.
Parasite genotyping was performed in order to differentiate between reinfection and recrudescent infections. Established procedures were employed using the PCR for the amplification of the merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP-1) and MSP-2 (10).
Statistical analysis. A sample size of 20 evaluable subjects was used to estimate the day 7 cure rate with appropriate accuracy. A 70% cure rate would have 95% confidence intervals of 46 to 88%. No comparison of the cure rate with internal or external controls was planned. Adverse events and tolerability assessments were based on results from the intention-to-treat population, defined as all individuals having taken at least one dose of the drug. The efficacy was evaluated based on results within the per-protocol population. Efficacy analysis was performed by calculating the cure rates and by analyzing descriptive statistics of parasite and fever clearance times. Calculations of confidence intervals were based on the exact binomial distribution. Changes in laboratory values were assessed by multiple measurement variance analysis. Differences among day 7, day 28, and baseline data were assessed by the paired t test. A P value below 0.05 was considered significant.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Characteristics on admission
|
During follow-up, two subjects were excluded, one being unavailable for follow-up and the other developing P. vivax parasitemia. Eighteen subjects were evaluable on day 28, and nine subjects (50%) experienced a reappearance of P. falciparum parasitemia (Table 2). A clear difference between the study sites was apparent, there being only two subjects in Gabon compared to seven subjects in Thailand who experienced recrudescence. The time to recrudescence was shorter in subjects from Thailand than in subjects from Gabon (mean, 21 versus 26 days). Parasite genotyping revealed that all cases of treatment failure were true recrudescences and not reinfections.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Efficacy of fosmidomycin at two end pointsa
|
A total of 46 adverse events were recorded throughout the study period, and 20 subjects (80%) had at least one adverse event. All adverse events were nonserious and mild or moderate in intensity. Ten adverse events were categorized as possibly being related to the study medication, and gastrointestinal events were the most frequent of these. These were recorded in five subjects (20%) and consisted of loose stools (three subjects), diarrhea (two subjects), and flatulence (two subjects). Elevations in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were recorded for two subjects (peak levels of 124 and 130 U/liter), and dizziness was reported in one subject as an adverse event. Vital signs remained within normal limits throughout the study.
Table 3 summarizes the laboratory data on admission and throughout the study. Significant differences over time (days 0, 2, 4, 7, 28, or at withdrawal) were found for most hematological parameters, reflecting in all cases changes normally encountered during a malarial infection. Specifically, these were reductions in hemoglobin and hematocrit measurements within the first days of treatment followed by a return to normal values and a fall in the numbers of eosinophils and thrombocytes during infection. Significant differences over time were found for levels of glucose, urea, albumin, and total protein. None of these differences was considered clinically significant. Elevation of ALT levels over 60 U/liter was found in five subjects. All subjects had an ALT level within the normal range by day 28 or upon withdrawal.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Laboratory values on admission and on days 7 and 28
|
|
|
|---|
Following confirmation from parasite genotyping that the recurrent parasitemias represented recrudescent infections, the radical cure rates of 78% in Gabon and 22% in Thailand revealed a marked variation in the overall response between the two centers. While this probably reflects the difference in immunity between a population from Central Africa where malaria is hyperendemic and a population from Asia where malaria is hypoendemic, other factors, including intrinsic sensitivity of the parasite, may be involved. A pooled estimate of cure rates should therefore be viewed with caution. The high prevalence of gametocytes for prolonged periods suggests that fosmidomycin is devoid of gametocytocidal activity.
A regimen of one dose every 8 h was chosen in this study because of the short half-life of fosmidomycin, which has been estimated to be 1.6 h (7, 8). For practical purposes, this regimen is too complex for outpatient use. Therefore, additional studies are under way to investigate the response to reducing the number of daily doses and curtailing the overall duration of treatment.
Due to the lack of a comparator arm in our study, interpretation of adverse events should be exercised with caution. Fosmidomycin appears to be well tolerated. In common with the adverse-effect profile of the earlier studies, gastrointestinal symptoms of loose stools, flatulence, and diarrhea were most commonly reported (9). These symptoms may be the result of poor absorption of the drug, previously found to be between 20 and 40% (7), and of the prolonged treatment regimen of 7 days. Therefore, alteration in the intestinal flora may have contributed to the development of diarrhea (4). The frequency of diarrhea was comparable to that found with other antibiotics (17). The small study size does not allow conclusions to be drawn from the less frequent side effects. Monitoring of vital signs and laboratory parameters showed no clinically significant changes.
The rapid and effective action of fosmidomycin in achieving clinical and short-term parasitological cures, in addition to its tolerability, are properties that should be exploited. Therefore, research should be directed towards the identification of a partner drug that would enhance its activity through potentiation while serving to protect it against the development of resistance (15). Furthermore, this study encourages the development of new inhibitors of the nonmevalonate pathway with increased bioavailability and enhanced antimalarial activity. A derivative of fosmidomycin, FR900098, and a prodrug of this compound have been shown to be more effective than fosmidomycin in the mouse model (5, 11). Since fosmidomycin represents a simple molecule, which can be synthesized from cheap raw materials, cost-efficient, large-scale production seems possible.
In summary, the advent of fosmidomycin as an inhibitor of the nonmevalonate pathway represents a novel approach to antimalarial chemotherapy. In view of the paucity of new leads emerging over the past decades, this signifies an important development.
We thank Win Gutteridge and Juntra Karbwang of the UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases for their assistance in the initial phase of the collaboration and for providing the monitoring resource.
The study was supported by a grant from the European Commission awarded to Jomaa Pharmaka GmbH and the Research Unit of the Albert Schweitzer Hospital (INCO-Dev, 5th Framework Programme, contract no. ICA4-2000-10290). The study was conducted under the joint sponsorship of Jomaa Pharmaka GmbH and the UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR). Financial support was provided by Jomaa Pharmaka GmbH.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»