Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 2003, p. 798-799, Vol. 47, No. 2
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.2.798-799.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Lars Hestbjerg Hansen, Elsebetta Johannesen, and Søren J. Sørensen*
Department of General Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, 1307 Copenhagen K, Denmark
Received 16 August 2002/ Returned for modification 16 September 2002/ Accepted 15 November 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Since the introduction of the compound in the 1980s, there has been some concern about whether resistance would arise and, if so, whether this resistance would be transferable and whether it would be linked to other resistance determinants (2, 5, 7). A survey study in Denmark has demonstrated the presence of a small fraction of olaquindox-resistant coliform bacteria in farm animals (3). Other studies have demonstrated increased resistance to olaquindox on pig farms using olaquindox. There was a slight correlation between resistance to olaquindox and resistance to chloramphenicol or ampicillin (5, 7). The aim of the present study was to find out if plasmid-bound olaquindox resistance exists.
Isolation of a resistant bacterium. Swine manure from a farm using olaquindox as a feed additive was tested for the presence of bacteria able to grow on Gould S1 medium (4) with 100 µg of olaquindox per ml. Diluted manure corresponding to 10 µl of undiluted manure gave rise to three uniform colonies that did not show the fluorescence characteristic of fluorescent pseudomonads. One of the colonies was restreaked several times on Levine EMB plates (GIBCO Products for Microbiology: Technical Manual and Catalog; GIBCO Laboratories, Madison, Wis.) and Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates (9), both containing 100 µg of olaquindox per ml. Olaquindox (98% pure; ICN, Costa Mesa, Calif.) was added as a 10-mg/ml stock solution in 2.5 M NaOH; HCl was added to the final medium to counteract the high pH. All incubations were done at 37°C. The isolate was identified as Escherichia coli by use of the API 20E system (BioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France).
Olaquindox resistance was tested with an agar dilution test, while resistance to an array of other antibiotics was tested with Sensititre plates (1). The isolate was found to be resistant to ampicillin (MIC, >32 µg/ml), kanamycin (MIC, >64 µg/ml), chloramphenicol (MIC, >64 µg/ml), nitrofurantoin (MIC, 128 µg/ml), streptomycin (MIC, 128 µg/ml), olaquindox (MIC, 128 µg/ml), sulfamethoxazole (MIC, >512 µg/ml), trimethoprim (MIC, >32 µg/ml), and carbadox (MIC, >128 µg/ml). The strain was sensitive to apramycin (MIC, 4 µg/ml), ciprofloxacin (MIC, 0.125 µg/ml), colistin (MIC, 1 µg/ml), gentamicin (MIC, 0.5 µg/ml), nalidixic acid (MIC, 16 µg/ml), and tetracycline (MIC, 1 µg/ml). In addition, the isolate did not grow on LB agar plates containing 100 µg of rifampin per ml.
Conjugal transfer of the plasmid. Tentative resistance plasmids were transferred to E. coli CSH26 (8) Rifr (resistant to rifampin at 100 µg/ml) by filter conjugation. Overnight cultures of the donor and recipient were harvested by centrifugation (6,000 x g, 5 min, 4°C), washed, and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline. Equal amounts of the two cultures were mixed and spread on sterile membrane filters (0.2-µm pore size) placed on LB agar plates. The filters were incubated at 37°C for 4 h, after which they were washed in phosphate-buffered saline. The experiment gave rise to approximately 10-4 transconjugants per recipient (T/R). The transconjugants had the rifampin resistance of the recipient combined with resistance to ampicillin (MIC, >32 µg/ml), chloramphenicol (MIC, 64 µg/ml), and olaquindox (MIC, 128 µg/ml). It had achieved intermediate resistance to nitrofurantoin (MIC, 64 µg/ml) relative to the recipient and was sensitive to kanamycin, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, and carbadox. The recipient strain did not grow on plates containing 100 µg of olaquindox per ml. Some of the resistance determinants of the isolate, including olaquindox resistance, had thus been transferred to E. coli CSH26, while others had not. This is consistent with earlier observations (5) that olaquindox resistance can be linked to chloramphenicol resistance. In this case, it is also linked to ampicillin resistance andto some extentnitrofurantoin resistance.
Plasmid DNA preparations (6) showed that the transconjugants had received one of the plasmid bands of the donor (data not shown). This plasmid was named pOLA52.
Restriction map. A restriction map of the plasmid has been constructed (Fig. 1) by use of the enzymes EcoRI, BglII, HindIII, BamHI, and SmaI. A QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit and a QIAGEN Plasmid Midi Kit were used for purification of plasmid DNA (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany). In order to improve the separation of large DNA fragments, these were subjected to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis with the Gene Navigator System (with a version 18-1019-19 electrophoresis unit and a HEX electrode) from Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology AB, Uppsala, Sweden.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Restriction map of pOLA52. Sites marked with asterisks have not been located exactly. The numbers following the names of the restriction enzymes are distances (in kilobases) from the BglII site defined to be the numbering starting point.
|
![]() View larger version (115K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Plasmid preparations from strains with and without pOLA52. All preparations were run with and without prior digestion with EcoRI. Lanes: 1, DNA digested with HindIII; 2 to 5, plasmid preparations from two transconjugants that had lost the ampicillin resistance of the plasmid (each is shown undigested and digested); 6 to 17, plasmid preparations from six transconjugants (each is shown undigested and digested); 18 and 19, plasmid preparation from the donor, undigested and digested; 20 and 21, "plasmid preparation" from the recipient (no plasmids), undigested and digested.
|
Present address: Danish Veterinary Institute, DK-1790 Copenhagen V, Denmark. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»