Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, March 2003, p. 1148-1150, Vol. 47, No. 3
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.3.1148-1150.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Antipneumococcal and Antistaphylococcal Activities of Ranbezolid (RBX 7644), a New Oxazolidinone, Compared to Those of Other Agents
Dianne B. Hoellman,1 Gengrong Lin,1 Lois M. Ednie,1 Ashok Rattan,2 Michael R. Jacobs,3 and Peter C. Appelbaum1*
Department of Pathology, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033,1
Ranbaxy Research Laboratories, New Delhi, India,2
Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 441063
Received 4 October 2002/
Returned for modification 2 December 2002/
Accepted 18 December 2002

ABSTRACT
For 260 pneumococcal and 266 staphylococcal strains, ranbezolid
MICs ranged from

0.06 to 4 µg/ml. The MICs for pneumococci
were similar irrespective of the strains' ß-lactam,
macrolide, or quinolone susceptibilities, and ranbezolid MICs
for coagulase-negative staphylococci were lower than those for
Staphylococcus aureus. Ranbezolid was bacteriostatic against
pneumococci. Ranbezolid MICs were similar to or lower than those
of linezolid. Vancomycin and quinupristin-dalfopristin were
also very active.

TEXT
The incidence of pneumococci being resistant to penicillin G
and other ß-lactams and non-ß-lactams has
increased worldwide at an alarming rate, including in the United
States (
1,
5,
9). There is an urgent need for oral compounds
for outpatient treatment of respiratory tract infections caused
by resistant pneumococci (
1,
5,
8). The emergence of methicillin-
and quinolone-intermediate, and recently glycopeptide-intermediate,
staphylococci, as well as the propensity of these organisms
to cause serious systemic infections in immunocompromised hosts,
also necessitates other therapeutic modalities (
7,
12,
21).
The MICs of linezolid, an oxazolidinone which has been available clinically for the past few years, for pneumococci and staphylococci range between 0.5 and 4 µg/ml, irrespective of the organisms' resistance to other agents (2-4, 6, 10, 15, 18). Ranbezolid (RBX 7644; Ranbaxy Research Laboratories, New Delhi, India) is a new parenteral oxazolidinone with enhanced activity against gram-positive aerobes and gram-positive and gram-negative anaerobes.
The present study compared (i) the antipneumococcal activity of ranbezolid with those of linezolid, vancomycin, teicoplanin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, and erythromycin by using MIC and time-kill studies and (ii) the antistaphylococcal activity of ranbezolid with those of linezolid, vancomycin, teicoplanin, and quinupristin-dalfopristin by using an MIC study.
The pneumococci tested comprised 89 penicillin-susceptible, 89 penicillin-intermediate, and 82 penicillin-resistant strains. Of these, 107 were erythromycin resistant. Twenty-six strains were quinolone resistant (levofloxacin MICs of
8 µg/ml). For time-kill studies, 12 penicillin-susceptible, -intermediate, and -resistant strains (four of each), including six macrolide-resistant and two quinolone-resistant strains, were tested. Sixty-eight methicillin-resistant and 65 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains and 69 methicillin-resistant and 64 methicillin-susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci were examined.
Ranbezolid susceptibility powder was obtained from Ranbaxy Research Laboratories. Other antimicrobials were obtained from their respective manufacturers. For testing with pneumococci, agar dilution was performed by using Mueller-Hinton agar (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) supplemented with 5% sheep blood (11). Methicillin MIC plates for staphylococci were incubated for a full 24 h (11).
For time-kill studies, tubes containing 5 ml of cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (Difco) plus 5% lysed horse blood with doubling antibiotic concentrations were inoculated with 5 x 105 to 5 x 106 CFU/ml and incubated at 35°C in a shaking water bath. The methods employed in this study have been described previously (13, 19, 20).
Time-kill assays were analyzed by determining the number of strains which yielded a change in log10 CFU per milliliter of -1, -2, and -3 at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h compared with the counts at time zero. Antimicrobials were considered bactericidal at the lowest concentration that reduced the original inoculum by
3 log10 CFU/ml (99.9%) at each of the time periods, and they were considered bacteriostatic if the inoculum was reduced by 0 to <3 log10 CFU/ml. The problem of bacterial carryover was addressed by dilution as described previously (13, 19, 20). For erythromycin time-kill testing, only strains for which erythromycin MICs were
4.0 µg/ml were tested.
Results of agar dilution MIC testing with strains classified by penicillin susceptibility are summarized in Table 1. Ranbezolid MICs (range, 0.06 to 2.0 µg/ml; MIC at which 50% of isolates tested are inhibited [MIC50], 0.5 µg/ml; MIC at which 90% of isolates tested are inhibited [MIC90], 1.0 µg/ml) were usually 2 to 3 dilutions lower than those of linezolid (range, 0.25 to 4.0 µg/ml; MIC50, 1.0 µg/ml; MIC90, 2.0 µg/ml) against all strains. All strains were also susceptible to vancomycin (MICs, 0.125 to 0.5 µg/ml), teicoplanin (MICs,
0.016 to 0.125 µg/ml), and quinupristin-dalfopristin (MICs, 0.125 to 1.0 µg/ml). The MICs of ß-lactams and macrolides increased with those of penicillin G. The results for all drugs tested, except penicillin G and amoxicillin-clavulanate, were similar when strains were analyzed according to erythromycin susceptibility. Moxifloxacin yielded the lowest quinolone MICs against quinolone-susceptible and -resistant strains.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1. MICs (micrograms per milliliter) obtained by agar dilution of agents for 260 strains classified by penicillin susceptibility
|
The results of time-kill analysis are presented in Table
2.
Ranbezolid and linezolid were mainly bacteriostatic, although
bactericidal activity (99.9% killing) was detected against nine
strains at four times the MIC after 24 h, with slower killing
at earlier time periods. Vancomycin, teicoplanin, quinupristin-dalfopristin,
amoxicillin-clavulanate, ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin
were bactericidal against 11 of the 12 strains tested at the
MIC after 24 h. Quinupristin-dalfopristin had the best kill
kinetics of all drugs tested, with bactericidal activity against
10 of the 12 strains tested at two times the MIC after 3 h and
against all 12 strains at two times the MIC after 24 h. Erythromycin
was bactericidal against 8 of 9 erythromycin strains, with MICs
of

4.0 µg/ml at two times the MIC after 24 h. Regrowth
was rarely found.
The MICs for staphylococci are listed in Tables
3 and
4. The
MIC
50 and MIC
90 of ranbezolid against
S. aureus were 2 and 2
µg/ml, respectively. By contrast, ranbezolid MICs against
coagulase-negative strains were lower, with an MIC
50 of 0.125
µg/ml and an MIC
90 of 1 µg/ml. Linezolid MICs, especially
against coagulase-negative strains, were often 1 to 2 dilutions
higher than those of ranbezolid. Vancomycin MICs were low against
all strains, but teicoplanin was much less active against coagulase-negative
strains. Quinupristin-dalfopristin was equally active against
all strains. The lower ranbezolid MICs for coagulase-negative
strains compared to those for
S. aureus and the relative inactivity
of teicoplanin against coagulase-negative staphylococci are
both noteworthy. Oxazolidinone MICs were not influenced by the
methicillin susceptibility of staphylococcal strains.
Ranbezolid is a new oxazolidinone with expanded activity against
gram-positive cocci, fastidious gram-negative rods, and anaerobes
(A. Rattan, A. Mehta, B. Das, M. Pandya, P. Bhateja, T. Mathur,
S. Singhal, R. Sood, S. Malhotra, A. Yadav, A. Ray, R. Rao,
and S. Rudra, Abstr. 42nd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents
Chemother., abstr. F-1288, 2002; D. Hoellman, L. Ednie, M. Jacobs,
A. Rattan, and P. Appelbaum, Abstr. 42nd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob.
Agents Chemother., abstr. F-1289, 2002; L. M. Kelly, D. Hoellman,
M. Jacobs, A. Rattan, and P. Appelbaum, Abstr. 42nd Intersci.
Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-1290, 2002; L.
Ednie, M. Jacobs, A. Rattan, and P. Appelbaum, Abstr. 42nd Intersci.
Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-1291, 2002; A.
Rattan, M. Pandya, P. Bhateja, T. Mathur, R. Dhar, B. Das, and
A. Mehta, 42nd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,
abstr. F-1294, 2002). The results of the present study confirm
the recently reported low MICs of ranbezolid against pneumococci
and staphylococci (see above-cited abstracts). As is the case
with other oxazolidinones (
4), ranbezolid was bacteriostatic
against most strains tested.
The results of MIC and time-kill studies of other compounds tested against pneumococci are similar to those described previously, with quinupristin-dalfopristin having the most rapid bactericidal activity, followed by quinolones, ß-lactams, and macrolides (2, 3, 6, 9,10, 13-20).
The results of this study indicate a potential role for ranbezolid in the treatment of pneumococcal and staphylococcal infections. However, interpretation of these in vitro results must be complemented by toxicity and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies before the drug can be recommended for clinical testing.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported by a grant from Ranbaxy Research Laboratories.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Pathology, Hershey Medical Center, P.O. Box 850, Hershey, PA 17033. Phone: (717) 531-5113. Fax: (717) 531-7953. E-mail:
pappelbaum{at}psu.edu.


REFERENCES
1 - Appelbaum, P. C. 1992. Antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: an overview. Clin. Infect. Dis. 15:77-83.[Medline]
2 - Cercenado, E., F. Garcia-Garrote, and E. Bouza. 2001. In-vitro activity of linezolid against multiply resistant gram-positive clinical isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 47:77-81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Cuny, C., and W. Witte. 2000. In vitro activity of linezolid against staphylococci. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 6:328-333.[CrossRef][Medline]
4 - Diekema, D. J., and R. N. Jones. 2000. Oxazolidinones: a review. Drugs 59:7-16.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - Friedland, I. R., and G. H. McCracken, Jr. 1994. Management of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. N. Engl. J. Med. 331:377-382.[Free Full Text]
6 - Henwood, C. J., D. M. Livermore, A. P. Johnson, D. James, M. Warner, A. Gardiner, and the Linezolid Study Group. 2000. Susceptibility of gram-positive cocci from 25 UK hospitals to antimicrobial agents including linezolid. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 46:931-940.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Hiramatsu, K. 1998. The emergence of Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin in Japan. Am. J. Med. 104:7S-10S.
8 - Jacobs, M. R., and P. C. Appelbaum. 1995. Antibiotic-resistant pneumococci. Rev. Med. Microbiol. 6:77-93.
9 - Jacobs, M. R., S. Bajaksouzian, A. Zilles, G. Lin, G. A. Pankuch, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1999. Susceptibilities of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae to 10 oral antimicrobial agents based on pharmacodynamic parameters: 1997 US surveillance study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1901-1908.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Livermore, D. M. 2000. Quinupristin/dalfopristin and linezolid: where, when, which and whether to use? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 46:347-350.[Free Full Text]
11 - National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 5th ed. Approved standard. NCCLS publication no. M7-A5. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
12 - Nichols, R. L. 1999. Optimal treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 44:19-23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Pankuch, G. A., M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1994. Study of comparative antipneumococcal activities of penicillin G, RP 59500, erythromycin, sparfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and vancomycin by using time-kill methodology. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:2065-2072.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Pankuch, G. A., M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1995. Comparative activity of ampicillin, amoxycillin, amoxycillin/clavulanate and cefotaxime against 189 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 35:883-888.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Patel, R., M. S. Rouse, K. E. Piper, and J. M. Steckelberg. 1999. In-vitro activity of linezolid against vancomycin-resistant enterococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 34:119-122.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 - Spangler, S. K., M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1992. Susceptibilities of penicillin-susceptible and -resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae to RP 59500, vancomycin, erythromycin, PD 131628, sparfloxacin, temafloxacin, Win 57273, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:856-859.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Spangler, S. K., M. R. Jacobs, G. A. Pankuch, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1993. Susceptibility of 170 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to six oral cephalosporins, four quinolones, desacetylcefotaxime, Ro 23-9424 and RP 67829. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 31:273-280.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18 - Stevens, D. L., L. G. Smith, J. B. Bruss, M. A. McConnell-Martin, S. E. Duvall, W. M. Todd, and B. Hafkin. 2000. Randomized comparison of linezolid (PNU-100766) versus oxacillin-dicloxacillin for treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:3408-3413.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19 - Visalli, M. A., M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1996. MIC and time-kill study of DU-6859a, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, cefotaxime, imipenem, and vancomycin against nine penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:362-366.[Abstract]
20 - Visalli, M. A., M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1997. Antipneumococcal activity of BAY 12-8039, a new quinolone, compared with activities of three other quinolones and four ß-lactams. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2786-2789.[Abstract]
21 - Voss, A., D. Milatovic, C. Wallrauch-Schwarz, V. T. Rosdahl, and I. Braveny. 1994. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Europe. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 13:50-55.[CrossRef][Medline]
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, March 2003, p. 1148-1150, Vol. 47, No. 3
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.3.1148-1150.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Kalia, V., Miglani, R., Purnapatre, K. P., Mathur, T., Singhal, S., Khan, S., Voleti, S. R., Upadhyay, D. J., Saini, K. S., Rattan, A., Raj, V. S.
(2009). Mode of Action of Ranbezolid against Staphylococci and Structural Modeling Studies of Its Interaction with Ribosomes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 1427-1433
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
McKee, E. E., Ferguson, M., Bentley, A. T., Marks, T. A.
(2006). Inhibition of Mammalian mitochondrial protein synthesis by oxazolidinones.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 2042-2049
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bogdanovich, T., Ednie, L. M., Shapiro, S., Appelbaum, P. C.
(2005). Antistaphylococcal Activity of Ceftobiprole, a New Broad-Spectrum Cephalosporin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 4210-4219
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bogdanovich, T., Esel, D., Kelly, L. M., Bozdogan, B., Credito, K., Lin, G., Smith, K., Ednie, L. M., Hoellman, D. B., Appelbaum, P. C.
(2005). Antistaphylococcal Activity of DX-619, a New Des-F(6)-Quinolone, Compared to Those of Other Agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 3325-3333
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cerca, N., Martins, S., Cerca, F., Jefferson, K. K., Pier, G. B., Oliveira, R., Azeredo, J.
(2005). Comparative assessment of antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci in biofilm versus planktonic culture as assessed by bacterial enumeration or rapid XTT colorimetry. J Antimicrob Chemother
56: 331-336
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fritsche, T. R., Sader, H. S., Cleeland, R., Jones, R. N.
(2005). Comparative Antimicrobial Characterization of LBM415 (NVP PDF-713), a New Peptide Deformylase Inhibitor of Clinical Importance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 1468-1476
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lin, G., Credito, K., Ednie, L. M., Appelbaum, P. C.
(2005). Antistaphylococcal Activity of Dalbavancin, an Experimental Glycopeptide. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 770-772
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ednie, L. M., Pankuch, G., Appelbaum, P. C.
(2004). Antipneumococcal Activity of LBM415, a New Peptide Diformylase Inhibitor, Compared with Those of Other Agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 4027-4032
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Credito, K., Lin, G., Ednie, L. M., Appelbaum, P. C.
(2004). Antistaphylococcal Activity of LBM415, a New Peptide Deformylase Inhibitor, Compared with Those of Other Agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 4033-4036
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hoellman, D. B., Pankuch, G. A., Appelbaum, P. C.
(2004). Antistaphylococcal Activity of CB-181963 (CAB-175), an Experimental Parenteral Cephalosporin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 4037-4039
[Abstract]
[Full Text]