This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown-Elliott, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown-Elliott, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, R. J., Jr.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2003, p. 1736-1738, Vol. 47, No. 5
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.5.1736-1738.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro Activity of Linezolid against Slowly Growing Nontuberculous Mycobacteria

Barbara A. Brown-Elliott,* Christopher J. Crist, Linda B. Mann, Rebecca W. Wilson, and Richard J. Wallace Jr.

Department of Microbiology, The University of Texas Health Center, Tyler, Texas

Received 2 December 2002/ Returned for modification 13 January 2003/ Accepted 29 January 2003


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
MICs of linezolid in broth microdilutions were tested against 341 slowly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) belonging to 15 species. The proposed linezolid susceptibility MICs for all Mycobacterium marinum, Mycobacterium szulgai, Mycobacterium kansasii, Mycobacterium malmoense, and Mycobacterium xenopi isolates and for 90% of Mycobacterium gordonae and Mycobacterium triplex isolates were <=8 µg/ml. Linezolid has excellent therapeutic potential against most species of NTM.


arrow
TEXT
 
Treatment of infections due to slowly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) remains difficult for many species. In some cases only a few drugs are available for therapy, and in most situations combination therapy is necessary. Previous in vitro studies with linezolid have shown it to be active against most species of rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) (11) and Nocardia (4) and recently against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (1) at readily achievable levels in serum. Thus, we undertook a study of the in vitro activity of linezolid against species of slowly growing NTM.

(This work was presented in part at the 42nd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Diego, Calif., 27 to 30 September 2002.)

We tested linezolid against 341 isolates of slowly growing NTM belonging to 15 species. This number included 335 clinical strains submitted for susceptibility testing and/or identification and six reference isolates kindly provided by the American Type Culture Collection (ATTC). The isolates included those of the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) (189 isolates), Mycobacterium marinum (47 isolates), Mycobacterium szulgai (10 isolates), Mycobacterium gordonae (21 isolates), Mycobacterium kansasii (19 isolates), Mycobacterium simiae complex (15 isolates), Mycobacterium terrae complex (11 isolates), Mycobacterium triplex (10 isolates), Mycobacterium lentiflavum (5 isolates), Mycobacterium xenopi (5 isolates), Mycobacterium malmoense (5 isolates), and one isolate each of Mycobacterium interjectum, Mycobacterium asiaticum, Mycobacterium scrofulaceum, and Mycobacterium branderi. Susceptibility was determined once for each isolate except for some reference strains.

The isolates were identified by standard methods, including a combination of traditional biochemicals and high-performance liquid chromatography (2, 6; S. H. Chiu, K. C. Jost, Jr., D. F. Dunbar, and L. B. Elliott, Abstr. 98th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 1998, abstr. U-76, p. 508, 1998), nucleic acid probes, (5) or PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the 439-bp Telenti fragment of the 65-kDa hsp gene (9, 10). Most isolates of the MAC were identified by high-performance liquid chromatography and/or nucleic acid probes. All species other than those of the MAC, M. kansasii, M. marinum, and M. gordonae were confirmed by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.

MICs were determined by using NCCLS-recommended serial twofold broth microdilutions in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (12). MICs were tested with multiple lots of plates with linezolid concentrations ranging from <=0.5 to 128 µg/ml. The MIC breakpoints were those proposed by the NCCLS for testing linezolid against RGM (12). Results were determined after 7 days of incubation at 35°C. The end point was complete (100%) inhibition of visible growth.

Quality control assays were performed with Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213; the linezolid MIC range for this strain is 1 to 4 µg/ml (after 18 to 24 h of incubation) (8). Additional quality control assays were performed with M. marinum ATCC 927T, M. avium ATCC 700898, M. avium ATCC 35712, M. avium ATCC 35718, M. triplex ATCC 700071T, and M. malmoense ATCC 29571T.

Generally, linezolid showed excellent activity, with most MICs in the proposed ranges for susceptible (MIC, <=8 µg/ml) or intermediate (MIC, <=16 µg/ml) organisms (Tables 1 and 2). The MICs for five isolates of M. lentiflavum were 8 to 16 µg/ml, and the MICs for five isolates of M. xenopi were 4 to 8 µg/ml (data not shown). The MICs for the single isolates of M. interjectum and M. asiaticum were 16 µg/ml (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Inhibition of slowly growing NTM by linezolid at specified MICs


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. In vitro activity of linezolid against eight species of slowly growing NTM

In contrast, linezolid was less active in vitro against isolates of the MAC, the M. terrae complex, and the M. simiae complex. The MICs for the single isolates of M. scrofulaceum and Mycobacterium branderi were >32 and 32 µg/ml, respectively (data not shown).

The MICs for the S. aureus quality control strain were within the expected range. M. marinum ATCC 927T was tested 58 times; the MIC for this strain was <=2 µg/ml (58 values). M. avium ATCC 700898, which is the NCCLS-recommended strain for susceptibility testing of clarithromycin with the MAC, was also tested 23 times, with a resulting modal MIC of 32 µg/ml (range, 8 to 32 µg/ml). M. triplex ATCC 700071 was tested twice, with a resulting MIC of 16 µg/ml both times. Other quality control organisms were tested only once. The MICs for M. avium ATCC 35712, M. avium ATCC 35718, M. triplex ATCC 700071T, and M. malmoense ATCC 29571T were 64, 16, 16, and <=2 µg/ml, respectively.

Previous studies have shown that 90% of the isolates of the RGM species Mycobacterium fortuitum and Mycobacterium chelonae were inhibited by <=16 µg of linezolid per ml, with modal MICs of <=8 µg/ml (11). Two immunosuppressed patients with macrolide-resistant disseminated M. chelonae infections as well as small numbers of other, nonimmunosuppressed patients have been successfully treated with linezolid (3; B. A. Brown-Elliott, R. J. Wallace, Jr., D. E. Griffith, D. Lakey, E. Moylett, M. Gareca, T. R. Perry, R. Blinkhorn, and D. Hopper, Abstr. 40th Annu. Meet. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2002, abstr. 609, p. 151, 2002; M. G. Gareca, B. A. Brown-Elliott, and R. J. Wallace, Jr., Abstr. 40th Annu. Meet. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2002, abstr. 265, p. 91, 2002). In the present study, linezolid demonstrated similar activities against most commonly encountered, slowly growing NTM, with only isolates of the MAC, the M. terrae complex, and M. simiae requiring >=32 µg/ml to inhibit 90% of the isolates tested. M. marinum, M. kansasii, M. gordonae, M. malmoense, and M. szulgai were the most susceptible species, with 100% of the strains inhibited by <=8 µg of linezolid per ml.

The peak levels of linezolid in serum after oral doses of 600 mg twice daily are 21.2 ± 5.8 µg/ml with a half-life of 5.4 h (package insert for Zyvox, Pharmacia and The Upjohn Co., Kalamazoo, Mich.). This suggests that 16 µg/ml may be a reasonable intermediate value for other organisms such as the NTM. Pending further clinical experience, we propose the following MIC breakpoints for the slowly growing NTM species: for susceptible isolates, <=8 µg/ml; for intermediate isolates, 16 µg/ml; and for resistant isolates, >=32 µg/ml. These same breakpoints have also been proposed by the NCCLS for antimycobacterial susceptibility testing (11, 12) for the RGM. For quality control in susceptibility testing, we recommend the use of M. avium ATCC 700898, with an acceptable linezolid MIC range of 8 to 32 µg/ml. We also recommend linezolid concentrations of 2 to 32 µg/ml for testing isolates of slowly growing NTM.

The use of linezolid for treatment of NTM infections has been very limited. This in part reflects the lack of long-term safety data, concern over limiting adverse hematologic events, and the cost of the drug (Brown-Elliott et al., Abstr. Annu. Meet. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am., 2002). One study suggested that once-daily adult dosing (600 mg) rather than the standard 600-mg twice-daily dosing that is used for bacterial species may be adequate for the treatment of mycobacterial infections and may also help to limit bone marrow suppression (Brown-Elliott et al., Abstr. Annu. Meet. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am., 2002). Linezolid has been used successfully to treat small numbers of patients with Nocardia (7) and RGM (3; Brown-Elliott et al., Abstr. Annu. Meet. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am., 2002; Gareca et al., Abstr. 40th Annu. Meet. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am., 2002), infections, which suggests that the drug may work for infections with slowly growing NTM.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Pharmacia Inc. for support of this research.

We also thank Joanne Woodring for preparation of the manuscript and the mycobacteriology section of the Texas Department of Health for assistance with the identification of some of the isolates.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: University of Texas Health Center, Department of Microbiology, 11937 US Hwy. 271, Tyler, TX 75708. Phone: (903) 877-7685. Fax: (903) 877-7652. E-mail: barbara.elliott{at}uthct.edu. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Alcalá, L., M. J. Ruiz-Serrano, C. Pérez-Fernández Turégano, D. García de Viedma, M. Díaz-Infantes, M. Marín-Arriaza, and E. Bouza. 2003. In vitro activities of linezolid against clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis that are susceptible or resistant to first-line antituberculous drugs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:416-417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    2. 2
  2. Brown, B. A., B. Springer, V. A. Steingrube, R. W. Wilson, G. E. Pfyffer, M. J. Garcia, M. C. Menendez, B. Rodriguez-Salgado, K. C. Jost, S. H. Chiu, G. O. Onyi, E. C. Böttger, and R. J. Wallace, Jr. 1999. Description of Mycobacterium wolinskyi and Mycobacterium goodii, two new rapidly growing species related to Mycobacterium smegmatis and associated with human wound infections: a cooperative study from the International Working Group on Mycobacterial Taxonomy. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 49:1493-1511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Brown-Elliott, B. A., R. J. Wallace, Jr., R. Blinkhorn, C. J. Crist, and L. B. Mann. 2001. Successful treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium chelonae infection with linezolid. Clin. Infect. Dis. 33:1433-1434.[CrossRef][Medline]
    4. 4
  4. 4. Brown-Elliott, B. A., S. C. Ward, C. J. Crist, L. B. Mann, R. W. Wilson, and R. J. Wallace, Jr. 2001. In vitro activities of linezolid against multiple Nocardia species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1295-1297.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    5. 5
  5. LeBrun, L., F. Espinasse, J. D. Poveda, and V. Vincent-Levy-Frebault. 1992. Evaluation of nonradioactive DNA probes for identification of mycobacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:2476-2478.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Metchock, B. G., F. S. Nolte, and R. J. Wallace, Jr. 1999. Mycobacterium, p. 399-437. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 7th ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
    7. 7
  7. Moylett, E. H., S. E. Pacheco, B. A. Brown-Elliott, T. R. Perry, E. S. Buescher, M. C. Birmingham, J. J. Schentag, J. F. Gimbel, A. Apodaca, M. A. Schwartz, R. M. Rakita, and R. J. Wallace, Jr. 2003. Clinical experience with linezolid for the treatment of Nocardia infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 36:313-318.
    8. 8
  8. NCCLS. 2002. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 11th informational supplement. Document M100-S11. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
    9. 9
  9. Steingrube, V. A., J. L. Gibson, B. A. Brown, Y. Zhang, R. W. Wilson, M. Rajagopalan, and R. J. Wallace, Jr. 1995. PCR amplification and restriction endonuclease analysis of a 65-kilodalton heat shock protein gene sequence for taxonomic separation of rapidly growing mycobacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:149-153.[Abstract]
    10. 10
  10. Telenti, A., F. Marchesi, M. Balz, F. Bally, E. C. Böttger, and T. Bodmer. 1993. Rapid identification of mycobacteria to the species level by polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:175-178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Wallace, R. J., Jr., B. A. Brown-Elliott, S. C. Ward, C. J. Crist, L. B. Mann, and R. W. Wilson. 2001. Activities of linezolid against rapidly growing mycobacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:764-767.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Woods, G. L., B. A. Brown-Elliott, E. P. Desmond, G. S. Hall, L. Heifets, G. E. Pfyffer, M. R. Plaunt, J. C. Ridderhof, R. J. Wallace, Jr., N. G. Warren, and F. G. Witebsky. 2000. Susceptibility testing of mycobacteria, nocardia, and other aerobic actinomycetes, 2nd ed. Tentative standard M24-T2. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2003, p. 1736-1738, Vol. 47, No. 5
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.5.1736-1738.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Condos, R., Hadgiangelis, N., Leibert, E., Jacquette, G., Harkin, T., Rom, W. N. (2008). Case Series Report of a Linezolid-Containing Regimen for Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Chest 134: 187-192 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Strobel, S., Belpedio, D., Sharrer, E., Pepe, L., McClellan, S. (2008). Unusual Infection in the Foot of a Barefoot Gardener. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 98: 311-313 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Griffith, D. E., Aksamit, T., Brown-Elliott, B. A., Catanzaro, A., Daley, C., Gordin, F., Holland, S. M., Horsburgh, R., Huitt, G., Iademarco, M. F., Iseman, M., Olivier, K., Ruoss, S., von Reyn, C. F., Wallace, R. J. Jr., Winthrop, K., on behalf of the ATS Mycobacterial Diseases Subcom, (2007). An Official ATS/IDSA Statement: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Diseases. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 175: 367-416 [Full Text]  
  • Vera-Cabrera, L., Brown-Elliott, B. A., Wallace, R. J. Jr., Ocampo-Candiani, J., Welsh, O., Choi, S. H., Molina-Torres, C. A. (2006). In Vitro Activities of the Novel Oxazolidinones DA-7867 and DA-7157 against Rapidly and Slowly Growing Mycobacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 4027-4029 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ji, B., Lefrancois, S., Robert, J., Chauffour, A., Truffot, C., Jarlier, V. (2006). In Vitro and In Vivo Activities of Rifampin, Streptomycin, Amikacin, Moxifloxacin, R207910, Linezolid, and PA-824 against Mycobacterium ulcerans.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 1921-1926 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fortun, J., Martin-Davila, P., Navas, E., Perez-Elias, M. J., Cobo, J., Tato, M., De la Pedrosa, E. G.-G., Gomez-Mampaso, E., Moreno, S. (2005). Linezolid for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. J Antimicrob Chemother 56: 180-185 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Liao, C.-H., Tseng, S.-P., Fang, C.-T., Teng, L.-J., Hsueh, P.-R. (2005). First linezolid- and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium strain in Taiwan. J Antimicrob Chemother 55: 598-599 [Full Text]  
  • Alcaide, F., Calatayud, L., Santin, M., Martin, R. (2004). Comparative In Vitro Activities of Linezolid, Telithromycin, Clarithromycin, Levofloxacin, Moxifloxacin, and Four Conventional Antimycobacterial Drugs against Mycobacterium kansasii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 4562-4565 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Spellberg, B., Yoo, T., Bayer, A. S. (2004). Reversal of linezolid-associated cytopenias, but not peripheral neuropathy, by administration of vitamin B6. J Antimicrob Chemother 54: 832-835 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Turenne, C. Y., Cook, V. J., Burdz, T. V., Pauls, R. J., Thibert, L., Wolfe, J. N., Kabani, A. (2004). Mycobacterium parascrofulaceum sp. nov., novel slowly growing, scotochromogenic clinical isolates related to Mycobacterium simiae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54: 1543-1551 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown-Elliott, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown-Elliott, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, R. J., Jr.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»