This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamaguchi, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamaguchi, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, Y.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2003, p. 1972-1975, Vol. 47, No. 6
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.6.1972-1975.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Chlamydia pneumoniae Resists Antibiotics in Lymphocytes

Hiroyuki Yamaguchi,1 Herman Friedman,1 Mayumi Yamamoto,2 Keigo Yasuda,2 and Yoshimasa Yamamoto1,3*

Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33612,1 Third Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu,2 Division of Molecular Microbiology, Department of Basic Laboratory Sciences, School of Allied Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan3

Received 16 September 2002/ Returned for modification 11 February 2003/ Accepted 24 February 2003


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
Chlamydia pneumoniae infection of lymphocytes in blood has been well documented, and it is apparent that control of this pathogen in these cells may be critical in the development of chronic inflammatory diseases associated with infection by this bacterium. The activity of antibiotics against C. pneumoniae in lymphocytes was assessed in this study by utilizing an in vitro infection model with lymphoid cells. The results obtained indicated that although all of the antibiotics tested showed remarkable activity against bacterial growth in epithelial cells, C. pneumoniae in lymphocytes was less susceptible to antibiotics than was bacterial growth in epithelial cells, which are widely used for the evaluation of anti-C. pneumoniae antibiotics.


arrow
TEXT
 
Mounting evidence supports the contention that atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory process that develops in response to a variety of injuries (25). A number of microbial organisms have been implicated in such pathogenesis. The strongest evidence to date for an association between an infectious agent and atherosclerosis is that for Chlamydia (Chlamydophila) pneumoniae (14), an obligate intracellular bacterium which is a causative agent of respiratory tract infections. However, there is still controversy regarding the possible involvement of C. pneumoniae in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Nevertheless, it has been shown seroepidemiologically that 50 to 80% of the adult population has had prior exposure to this pathogen (2, 24).

C. pneumoniae preferentially infects respiratory tract epithelial cells. While the pathogenic potential of this pathogen in the respiratory system is well established, several current studies suggest that the organism may disseminate from this site, probably via circulating leukocytes, including monocytes and lymphocytes (6, 17). In this regard, the detection of C. pneumoniae antigen in blood obtained from patients with or without coronary artery disease (CAD) has been demonstrated (7, 8, 15, 20). Furthermore, it has been shown that C. pneumoniae DNA can be recovered from CD3+ peripheral blood leukocytes obtained from patients with CAD (9). These findings indicate that peripheral blood leukocytes, particularly lymphocytes, may be host cells for C. pneumoniae and may play a critical role in the development of atherosclerosis (6).

The susceptibility of C. pneumoniae to antibiotics after invasion of monocytes and lymphocytes is not well known but likely is critical in controlling the spread of the organism from the lungs to possible sites of chronic infection (e.g., atheroma). Therefore, it is important to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of C. pneumoniae in monocytes and lymphocytes to provide information for improved treatment of individuals who carry C. pneumoniae in their blood. In this regard, a recent study showed that antibiotics do not inhibit chlamydial growth within monocytes (3).

C. pneumoniae TW183, kindly provided by G. Byrne, University of Wisconsin, Madison, was used in this study. The bacteria were propagated in HEp-2 cells as described previously (21). Human epithelial HEp-2, monocytic THP-1, T-lymphoid Molt 4, and B-lymphoid P3HR1 cells were kindly provided by R. Widen, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, Fla. HEp-2 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS; HyClone, Logan, Utah). Other cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FCS.

Azithromycin (AZM; Pfizer Inc., New York, N.Y.), clarithromycin (CLR; Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), tosufloxacin (TFLX; Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and minocycline (MINO; Sigma) were used in this study. MICs and minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of antibiotics against C. pneumoniae were determined by a method recommended by the Japan Society of Chemotherapy (10, 11). In brief, HEp-2, THP-1, Molt 4, or P3HR1 cells (2 x 105 cells/well) were dispensed into 24-well plates 24 h prior to infection with bacteria. The cells were infected with C. pneumoniae at infectivity ratios of 0.1 (HEp-2 cells) to 1 (THP-1, Molt 4, and P3HR1 cells) organism per cell by centrifugation at 700 x g for 1 h. These infectivity ratios were designed to develop 104 chlamydial inclusions per well at 3 days after infection. The infected cells were then cultured with cycloheximide (HEp-2 and THP-1 cells, 1 µg/ml; Molt 4 and P3HR1 cells, 0.5 µg/ml) in the presence or absence of serially diluted antibiotics at 37°C for 72 h in 5% CO2. After incubation, the cells were stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-Chlamydia genus-specific monoclonal antibody (Research Diagnostics, Flanders, N.J.) for the detection of chlamydial inclusions. The MIC was the lowest antibiotic concentration at which no inclusions were seen. The MBC was the lowest antibiotic concentration which resulted in no inclusions after passage. Since the MBC assay used in this study did not have any passage step in antibiotic-free HEp-2 cells before the assessment of the MBC, it can be conjectured that some bacteria might still be present and waiting for a chance to grow.

For assessment of the activity of antibiotics against bacteria infecting primary lymphocytes, mouse lymphocytes prepared from spleens of 10- to 12-week-old BALB/c female mice (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine) were used. Spleen cell suspensions in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FCS were cultured on tissue culture dishes to promote adherence of macrophages for 2 h at 37°C. Nonadherent lymphocytes (106cells/well, 24-well plates) were collected and then infected with bacteria (one organism per cell). HEp-2 cells were used as reference cells. The infected cells were then cultured with cycloheximide (HEp-2 cells, 1 µg/ml; lymphocytes, 0.5 µg/ml) in the presence or absence of antibiotics at the following final concentrations (16 times the MICs): AZM and TFLX, 4 µg/ml; CLR, 2 µg/ml; and MINO, 1 µg/ml.

Bacterial growth and viability in cultures were assessed by measurement of bacterial transcripts as described previously (5). The extracted RNAs were subjected to reverse transcription (RT)-PCR specific for C. pneumoniae 16S rRNA as described previously (5). The PCR products were determined by densitometric reading after electrophoresis in an ethidium bromide-stained 2% agarose gel. Statistical analysis was performed with the unpaired Student t test.

The model of established lymphoid cell lines infected with C. pneumoniae used in this study was established by Yamaguchi et al. (27). The growth of C. pneumoniae in all of the cells used in this study was well supported, with more than 10-fold increases in infective progenies in THP-1, Molt 4, and P3HR1 cells and more than a 100-fold increase in infective progenies in HEp-2 cells during culturing for 3 days. As shown in Table 1, all antibiotics used were very effective against C. pneumoniae growth in HEp-2 epithelial cells. Bacterial growth in monocytes (THP-1) was also markedly suppressed by either AZM or TFLX at the same concentrations as those that were effective in epithelial cells. However, CLR and MINO did not show any inhibitory activity against chlamydial growth in monocytes. In contrast, C. pneumoniae growth in T lymphocytes (Molt 4) was inhibited by TFLX and CLR, with MICs comparable to those in HEp-2 cells, but not by AZM or MINO. Surprisingly, all antibiotics tested failed to inhibit the growth of C. pneumoniae in B lymphocytes (P3HR1), even at a concentration as high as 32 µg/ml, which was more than 10 times the concentration in serum.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. MICs and MBCs of AZM, TFLX, CLR, and MINO against C. pneumoniae in different cell types

In order to confirm the effect of antibiotics on the growth of C. pneumoniae in lymphocytes, primary cultures of mouse spleen lymphocytes were used for C. pneumoniae infection, since immortalized cells may be different from primary cells with regard to pharmacological as well as cell biological aspects. The assessment of bacterial growth in lymphocytes by RT-PCR revealed a significant increase in the levels of C. pneumoniae 16S rRNA transcripts during culturing for 3 days (data not shown). All antibiotics used failed to inhibit bacterial growth in primary lymphocyte cultures (Fig. 1B) at concentrations which completely inhibited C. pneumoniae growth in HEp-2 reference cells (Fig. 1A).



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Effect of antibiotics on the growth of C. pneumoniae in primary lymphocyte cultures versus established HEp-2 epithelial cell cultures. Relative levels of C. pneumoniae-specific 16S rRNA transcripts in infected cells at the indicated days after infection were determined by RT-PCR. Data are shown as arbitrary reading units and represent the mean and standard deviation for three experiments. An asterisk indicates a P value of <0.05 for treated cultures compared to control cultures without antibiotics.

The recovery of C. pneumoniae from atheromas of CAD patients has led to the initiation of pilot studies of ways to eradicate this pathogen from vascular tissue by antibiotic treatment. A number of trials of prospective antibiotic interventions targeted against C. pneumoniae infections in patients with CAD are now under way (1). Data from some intervention studies suggested that treatment with antibiotics decreases inflammatory markers, but adverse clinical events were not uniformly reduced in the trials (25). For instance, in the largest study published to date on antimicrobial treatment in CAD patients, AZT treatment had no significant effect on clinical events (18). In addition, the present study indicates that the pathogen may not be eliminated from its host by standard antichlamydial treatments (3). These reports leave unanswered questions regarding the effectiveness of antibiotics against C. pneumoniae in the blood vessel system.

Tetracyclines and macrolides have frequently been used for the treatment of chlamydial infections (4, 22, 23). However, all data published regarding the in vitro susceptibility of C. pneumoniae to antibiotics are limited because of the use of only established epithelial cells, such as HEp-2 cells. The susceptibility of C. pneumoniae to antibiotics in leukocytes, such as lymphocytes and monocytes, which may be important in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis associated with this pathogen, has not been well studied.

The study reported here clearly demonstrated that the susceptibility of C. pneumoniae to antibiotics was dependent on host cells, even though the results were obtained under only limited experimental conditions. The growth of C. pneumoniae in HEp-2 epithelial cells was markedly suppressed by the antibiotics used, and MICs and MBCs were comparable to those in previous reports (11, 16, 26). In contrast, bacterial growth in THP-1 monocytes and Molt 4 T lymphocytes did not show uniform susceptibility to the antibiotics used. Furthermore, C. pneumoniae in P3HR1 B lymphocytes showed remarkable resistance to all of the antibiotics tested. The reason for the differences among host cells in susceptibility to antibiotics is not clear. Differences between epithelial cells and other cells, particularly lymphocytes, in the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics are a possible mechanism. In this regard, different levels of AZM uptake by cultured cells, including epithelial cells, neutrophils, and macrophages, have been demonstrated (19). However, there is limited information regarding the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in lymphocytes. Differences among host cells in bacterial growth rates are also a possible mechanism for explaining why C. pneumoniae in lymphocytes was resistant to antibiotics, since actively growing bacteria are more susceptible to antibiotics. In this regard, recent studies reported by Kutlin et al. (12, 13) showed that antibiotics, including AZM and CLR, probably do not eliminate C. pneumoniae from HEp-2 cells because of its persistent state in these cells. Therefore, a persistent, nonreplicating state of this pathogen is also a possible reason for the resistance. However, this mechanism may not fully explain the resistance of bacteria in lymphocytes, since P3HR1 cells supported more bacterial growth than Molt 4 cells, although the susceptibility of bacteria in P3HR1 cells was minimal (data not shown).

The reason for the different antimicrobial activities of AZM and CLR, both of which are macrolide antibiotics, against bacteria in immune cells is not clear. The different pharmacokinetics of these antibiotics in immune cells may be a responsible factor.

The antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria in immortalized cells may not be directly comparable with that in vivo. Therefore, the effect of antibiotics on bacteria in primary lymphocytes was assessed. Since C. pneumoniae growth in primary lymphocyte cultures was inferior to that in HEp-2 cells (6), measurement of bacterial transcripts by RT-PCR, which has been established as an antibiotic susceptibility assay for this pathogen (10), was performed to assess bacterial growth. The results obtained showed that all drugs tested had no effect on bacterial growth in primary lymphocyte cultures.

Even though only one bacterial strain was used in this study for evaluation of the effects of antibiotics on bacterial growth in different host cells, differences among host cells in the susceptibilities of the bacteria were obvious. Particularly in lymphocytes, C. pneumoniae was quite resistant to antibiotics. Thus, the results obtained indicate the possibility that commonly available antibiotics may not eradicate C. pneumoniae from blood, particularly from lymphocytes.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Molecular Microbiology, Department of Basic Laboratory Sciences, School of Allied Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka University, 1-7 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. Phone: 81-6-6879-2580. Fax: 81-6-6879-2499. E-mail: yyamamot{at}sahs.med.osaka-u.ac.jp. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Anand, V., and S. Gupta. 2001. Antibiotic therapy in coronary heart disease—where do we currently stand? Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 15:209-210.[CrossRef][Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Blasi, F., R. Cosentini, M. C. Schoeller, A. Lupo, and L. Allegra. 1993. Chlamydia pneumoniae seroprevalence in immunocompetent and immunocompromised populations in Milan. Thorax 48:1261-1263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Gieffers, J., H. Fullgraf, J. Jahn, M. Klinger, K. Dalhoff, H. A. Katus, W. Solbach, and M. Maass. 2001. Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in circulating human monocytes is refractory to antibiotic treatment. Circulation 103:351-356.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Hammerschlag, M. R., and P. M. Roblin. 2000. Microbiologic efficacy of moxifloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia due to Chlamydia pneumoniae. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 15:149-152.[CrossRef][Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Haranaga, S., H. Ikejima, H. Yamaguchi, H. Friedman, and Y. Yamamoto. 2002. Analysis of Chlamydia pneumoniae growth in cells by reverse transcription-PCR targeted to bacterial gene transcripts. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 9:313-319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Haranaga, S., H. Yamaguchi, H. Friedman, S. Izumi, and Y. Yamamoto. 2001. Chlamydia pneumoniae infects and multiplies in lymphocytes in vitro. Infect. Immun. 69:7753-7759.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    7. 7
  7. Haranaga, S., H. Yamaguchi, G. F. Leparc, H. Friedman, and Y. Yamamoto. 2001. Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae antigenin PBMNCs of healthy blood donors. Transfusion 41:1114-1119.[CrossRef][Medline]
    8. 8
  8. Iliescu, E. A., M. F. Fiebig, A. R. Morton, and P. Sankar-Mistry. 2000. Chlamydia pneumoniae DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit. Dial. Int. 20:722-726.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Kaul, R., J. Uphoff, J. Wiedeman, S. Yadlapalli, and W. M. Wenman. 2000. Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae DNA in CD3+ lymphocytes from healthy blood donors and patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 102:2341-2346.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    10. 10
  10. Khan, M. A., C. W. Potter, and R. M. Sharrard. 1996. A reverse transcriptase-PCR based assay for in-vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing of Chlamydia pneumoniae. J. Antimicrob Chemother. 37:677-685.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Kuo, C. C., L. A. Jackson, A. Lee, and J. T. Grayston. 1996. In vitro activities of azithromycin, clarithromycin, and other antibiotics against Chlamydia pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2669-2670.[Abstract]
    12. 12
  12. Kutlin, A., C. Flegg, D. Stenzel, T. Reznik, P. M. Roblin, S. Mathews, P. Timms, and M. R. Hammerschlag. 2001. Ultrastructural study of Chlamydia pneumoniae in a continuous-infection model. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3721-3723.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Kutlin, A., P. M. Roblin, and M. R. Hammerschlag. 2002. Effect of prolonged treatment with azithromycin, clarithromycin, or levofloxacin on Chlamydia pneumoniae in a continuous-infection model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:409-412.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    14. 14
  14. Maass, M., C. Bartels, P. M. Engel, U. Mamat, and H. H. Sievers. 1998. Endovascular presence of viable Chlamydia pneumoniae is a common phenomenon in coronary artery disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 31:827-832.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Maass, M., J. Jahn, J. Gieffers, K. Dalhoff, H. A. Katus, and W. Solbach. 2000. Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae within peripheral blood monocytes of patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction. J. Infect. Dis. 181(Suppl. 3):S449-S451.
    16. 16
  16. Miyashita, N., Y. Niki, T. Kishimoto, M. Nakajima, and T. Matsushima. 1997. In vitro and in vivo activities of AM-1155, a new fluoroquinolone, against Chlamydia spp. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1331-1334.[Abstract]
    17. 17
  17. Moazed, T. C., C. C. Kuo, J. T. Grayston, and L. A. Campbell. 1998. Evidence of systemic dissemination of Chlamydia pneumoniae via macrophages in the mouse. J. Infect. Dis. 177:1322-1325.[Medline]
    18. 18
  18. Muhlestein, J. B., J. L. Anderson, J. F. Carlquist, K. Salunkhe, B. D. Horne, R. R. Pearson, T. J. Bunch, A. Allen, S. Trehan, and C. Nielson. 2000. Randomized secondary prevention trial of azithromycin in patients with coronary artery disease: primary clinical results of the ACADEMIC study. Circulation 102:1755-1760.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    19. 19
  19. Pascual, A., J. Rodriguez-Bano, S. Ballesta, I. Garcia, and E. J. Perea. 1997. Azithromycin uptake by tissue cultured epithelial cells. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 39:293-295.[Free Full Text]
    20. 20
  20. Rassu, M., F. M. Lauro, S. Cazzavillan, E. Bonoldi, M. Belloni, M. C. Bettini, A. Pilotto, C. Mengoli, A. Peron, R. Zambello, M. Scagnelli, and G. Bertoloni. 2001. Detection of Chlamydophila pneumoniae DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of blood donors in the north-east of Italy. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. (Berlin) 190:139-144.[Medline]
    21. 21
  21. Roblin, P. M., W. Dumornay, and M. R. Hammerschlag. 1992. Use of HEp-2 cells for improved isolation and passage of Chlamydia pneumoniae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:1968-1971.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    22. 22
  22. Roblin, P. M., and M. R. Hammerschlag. 1998. Microbiologic efficacy of azithromycin and susceptibilities to azithromycin of isolates of Chlamydia pneumoniae from adults and children with community-acquired pneumonia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:194-196.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    23. 23
  23. Roblin, P. M., G. Montalban, and M. R. Hammerschlag. 1994. Susceptibilities to clarithromycin and erythromycin of isolates of Chlamydia pneumoniae from children with pneumonia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:1588-1589.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    24. 24
  24. Stolk-Engelaar, M. V., and M. F. Peeters. 1992. Seroprevalence of Chlamydia pneumoniae in the normal population. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 11:478.[CrossRef][Medline]
    25. 25
  25. Temesgen, Z., and S. E. Girard. 2001. Emerging concepts in disease management: a role for antimicrobial therapy in coronary artery disease. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2:765-772.[CrossRef][Medline]
    26. 26
  26. Welsh, L., C. Gaydos, and T. C. Quinn. 1996. In vitro activities of azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, and tetracycline against 13 strains of Chlamydia pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:212-214.[Abstract]
    27. 27
  27. Yamaguchi, H., S. Haranaga, H. Friedman, J. A. Moor, K. E. Muffly, and Y. Yamamoto. 2002. A Chlamydia pneumoniae infection model by using established human lymphocyte cell lines. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 216:229-234.[CrossRef][Medline]

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2003, p. 1972-1975, Vol. 47, No. 6
0066-4804/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.6.1972-1975.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Yamaguchi, H., Kamiya, S., Uruma, T., Osaki, T., Taguchi, H., Hanawa, T., Fukuda, M., Kawakami, H., Goto, H., Friedman, H., Yamamoto, Y. (2008). Chlamydia pneumoniae Growth Inhibition in Cells by the Steroid Receptor Antagonist RU486 (Mifepristone). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 1991-1998 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Uruma, T., Yamaguchi, H., Fukuda, M., Kawakami, H., Goto, H., Kishimoto, T., Yamamoto, Y., Tomoda, A., Kamiya, S. (2005). Chlamydia pneumoniae growth inhibition in human monocytic THP-1 cells and human epithelial HEp-2 cells by a novel phenoxazine derivative. J Med Microbiol 54: 1143-1149 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tormakangas, L., Alakarppa, H., David, D. B., Leinonen, M., Saikku, P. (2004). Telithromycin Treatment of Chronic Chlamydia pneumoniae Infection in C57BL/6J mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 3655-3661 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamaguchi, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamaguchi, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, Y.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»